Skip to main content

Full text of "Earth's Shifting Crust"

See other formats


PAGES  MISSING 
WITHIN  THE 
BOOK  ONLY 

TIGHT  BINDING  BOOK 


TO 

1 62044     m 


Earth's  Shifting  Crust 

A  Key  to  Some  Basic  Problems  of  Earth  Science 
by  CHARLES  H.  HAPGOOD 

with  the  collaboration  of  JAMES  H.  CAMPBELL 


Foreword  by 
ALBERT  EINSTEIN 


PANTHEON  BOOKS 


Copyright  ©  1958  by  Charles  H.  Hapgood 
Published  by  Pantheon  Books  Inc. 
333  Sixth  Avenue,  New  York  14,  N.  Y. 
Published  simultaneously  in  Canada  by 
McClelland  &  Stewart,  Ltd.,  Toronto,  Canada 
Library  of  Congress  Catalog  Card  No.  58-5504 
Manufactured  in  the  U.S.A. 


to  FRED,  WILLIE,  PRU,  and  MARY  G. 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

FOREWORD  by  Albert  Einstein  j 

AUTHOR'S  NOTE:  To  the  Layman  and  the  Specialist  3 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  5 

INTRODUCTION:  A  New  Theory  10 

i.  Some  Unsolved  Problems,  10;  2.  Crust  Displacement  as 
a  Solution,  13;  3.  A  Possible  Cause  of  Crust  Displace- 
ment, 15 

I.  PAST  THEORIES  OF  POLAR  SHIFT  24 
i.  Older  Theories,  24;    2,  The  Wegener  Theory,  26; 

3.  New  Proposals  of  Polar  Shift,  32 

II.  THE  ICE  AGES  34 
i.  The  Failure  of  the  Older  Theories,  34;   2.  The  Mis- 
placed Icecaps,  35;  3.  World-wide  Phases  of  Cold  Weather, 

38;  4.  The  New  Evidence  of  Radiocarbon  Dating,  44; 
5.  The  New  Evidence  from  Antarctica,  49;  6.  Conclu- 
sion, 56 

III.  ANCIENT  CLIMATES  58 
i.  Ages  of  Bloom  in  Antarctica,  58;  2.  Warm  Ages  in  the 
North,  61;  3.  Universal  Temperate  Climates— A  Fallacy, 

65;  4.  The  Eddington-Pauly  Suggestion,  70;  5.  The  Con- 
tribution of  George  W.  Bain,  7156.  The  Contribution  of 
T.  Y.  H.  Ma,  73;  7.  On  the  Rate  of  Climatic  Change,  77 

IV.  THE  MOUNTAINS  79 

Part  I.  The  Folding  and  Fracturing  of  the  Crust,  79; 
i.  The  Problem  of  Crustal  Folding,  80;  2.  Campbell's 
Theory  of  Mountain  Building,  90;  3.  The  Effects  of  Pole- 
ward Displacement,  100;  4.  The  Mountain-Building 
Force,  103;  5.  Existing  Fracture  Systems  as  Evidence  for 
the  Theory,  104 

Part  1L  Volcanism  and  Other  Questions,  in;  6.  Volcan- 
ism,  1 1 1 ;  7.  The  Volcanic  Island  Arcs,  11418  The  Heat  of 


the  Earth,  116;  9.  Changing  Sea  Levels,  120;  10.  Some 
Light  from  Mars,  126;  n.  Undisturbed  Sections  of  the 
Crust,  127;  12.  The  Chronology  of  Mountain  Building, 
128 

V.  CONTINENTS  AND  OCEAN  BASINS  132 
i.  The  Central  Problem,  132;  2.  The  Views  of  the  Geo- 
physicists,    134;    3.  The  Views  of  the  Biologists,   135; 

4.  Geologists  Allied  with  Biologists,  139;  5.  The  Evidence 
of  Oceanography,  145;  6.  The  Deeper  Structure  of  the 
Earth's  Crust,  149 

VI.  THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  158 
i.  Isostasy  and  the  Icecap,  158;  2.  The  Antarctic  Icecap  Is 
Growing,  164;  3.  A  Suggestion  from  Einstein,  172;  4.  The 
Triaxial  Shape  of  the  Earth,  180;  5.  The  State  of  Matter 
Below  the  Crust,  185 

VII.  NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE  193 
i.  The  Polar  Icecap,  193;  2.  The  Displacement  Caused  by 

the  Ice  Sheet,  197;  3.  The  Cause  of  the  Oscillations  of  the 
Ice  Sheet  and  the  Cause  of  the  Climatic  Optimum,  204; 

4.  The  Glaciation  of  Europe,  2 10;  5.  Changes  in  Sea  Level 
at  the  End  of  the  Ice  Age,  216;  6.  Darwin's  Rising  Beach- 
line  in  South  America,  225 

VIII.  THE  GREAT  EXTINCTIONS  227 
i.  The  Extinction  of  the  Mammoths,  227;   2.  The  Mam- 
moth's Adaptation  to  Cold,  229;  3.  The  Present  Climate 

of  Siberia,  233;   4.  A  Sudden  Change  of  Climate?,  237; 

5.  The  Beresovka  Mammoth,  244;  6.  The  Interpretation 
of  the  Report,  249;  7.  The  Mastodons  of  New  York,  257; 
8.  StormI,  266 

IX.  EARLIER  DISPLACEMENTS  OF  THE  CRUST        272 
i.  Introduction,  272;  2.  Weakness  of  the  Accepted  Glacial 
Chronology,  278;  3.  The  Beginning  of  the  Wisconsin  Gla- 
ciation, 283;  a.  The  Arctic  Cores,  284;  b.  Earlier  Phases 

of  the  Wisconsin  Glaciation,  287;  4.  Greenland  at  the 


Pole,  288;  a.  Cores  from  the  San  Augustin  Plains,  290; 
b.  Some  North  Atlantic  Cores,  293;  c.  A  North  Atlantic 
Land  Mass?,  297;  d.  Additional  Atlantic  Cores,  300; 
5.  Alaska  at  the  Pole,  303;  6.  The  Remoter  Past,  308 

X.  LIFE  315 
i.  The  Cause  of  Evolution,  315;  2.  The  Problem  of  Time, 
316;  3.  Climate  and  Evolution,  320;  4.  The  Distribution 

of  Species,  325;  5.  The  Periods  of  Revolutionary  Change 
in  Life  Forms,  329;  6.  The  Extinction  of  Species,  332; 
7.  The  Gaps  in  the  Fossil  Record,  337;  8.  Summary,  339 

XI.  CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  OF  DISPLACEMENT    340 

i.  The  Logic  of  the  Evidence,  340;  2.  Calculating  the 
Centrifugal  Effect,  343;  3.  The  Wedge  Effect,  345;  4.  Some 
Difficulties,  352;  5.  The  Calculations,  359;  6.  Notes  of  a 
Conference  with  Einstein,  361;  7.  Isostasy  and  Centrifugal 
Effect,  365 

XII.  CONCLUSION  379 
i.  Looking  Forward,  379;  2.  A  General  Summary,  386 

APPENDIX:  Letters  from  Albert  Einstein  and  George 

Sarton  390 

GLOSSARY  393 

BIBLIOGRAPHY  396 

INDEX  OF  NAMES  421 

INDEX  OF  SUBJECTS  425 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 

Fig.  I.  The  Centrifugal  Effect  of  the  Antarctic  Icecap. 

John  L.  Howard.  18 

Fig.  II.  Mountain  Building:  Patterns  of  Fracture  and 

Folding.  James  H.  Campbell.  94 

Fig.  III.  Vertical  View  of  the  Earth  with  Cross  Section  at 

96°  E.  Long.  James  H.  Campbell.  95 

Fig.  IV.        Patterns  of  Fracture.  James  H.  Campbell.  96 

Fig.  V.  Consequences  of  Displacement:  Cross  Section  of 
Earth  at  96°  East  of  Greenwich  Showing  Centrif- 
ugal Effect  of  Icecap.  John  L.  Howard.  154 

Fig.  VI.  Consequences  of  Displacement:  Cross  Section  of 
Earth  at  96°  East  of  Greenwich  Showing  Hypo- 
thetical Effect  of  Shift  of  Crust.  John  L. 
Howard.  154 

Fig.  VII.  Antarctica:  Three  Earlier  Locations  of  the 

South  Pole.  John  L.  Howard.  276 

Fig.  VIII.  Pollen  Profile  from  the  San  Augustin  Plains, 

New  Mexico.  Clisby  and  Sears.  291 

Fig.  IX.  Chronology  of  Sediments  in  the  North  Atlantic 
Cores  P-i24(3),  P-1«6(5),  P-i3o(g).  Piggott  and 
Urry.  295 

Fig.  X.  North  Atlantic  Cores  A  172-6,  A  199-4,  A  180- 

75.  Hans  E  Suess.  301 

Fig.  XI.  Lithology  of  Core  Samples,  Ross  Sea,  Antarctica. 

Jack  L.  Hough.  306 

Fig.  XII.  The  Centrifugal  Effect  of  the  Icecap.  Use  of  the 
Parallelogram  of  Forces  to  Calculate  the  Tan- 
gential Component.  James  H.  Campbell.  343 

Fig.  XIII.  A  Cross  Section  of  the  Earth  Showing  the  Re- 
lation Between  the  Crust  and  the  Equatorial 
Bulge.  James  H.  Campbell.  346 

Fig.  XIV.  Various  Aspects  of  the  Wedge  Effect.  James  H. 

Campbell.  347 

Fig.  XV.      The  Wedge  Effect.  James  H.  Campbell.  348 


"We  know  that  there  is  no  absolute  knowledge,  that  there 
are  only  theories;  but  we  forget  this.  The  better  educated 
we  are,  the  harder  we  believe  in  axioms.  I  asked  Einstein 
in  Berlin  once  how  he,  a  trained,  drilled,  teaching  scientist 
of  the  worst  sort,  a  mathematician,  physicist,  astronomer, 
had  been  able  to  make  his  discoveries.  'How  did  you  ever  do 
it/  I  exclaimed,  and  he,  understanding  and  smiling,  gave  the 
answer: 

"  'By  challenging  an  axiom  I' " 

Lincoln  Steffens,  Autobiography  (p.  816) 


FOREWORD  by  Albert  Einstein 

I  frequently  receive  communications  from  people  who  wish 
to  consult  me  concerning  their  unpublished  ideas.  It -goes 
without  saying  that  these  ideas  are  very  seldom  possessed  of 
scientific  validity.  The  very  first  communication,  however, 
that  I  received  from  Mr.  Hapgood  electrified  me.  His  idea  is 
original,  of  great  simplicity,  and— if  it  continues  to  prove  it- 
self—of great  importance  to  everything  that  is  related  to  the 
history  of  the  earth's  surface. 

A  great  many  empirical  data  indicate  that  at  each  point  on 
the  earth's  surface  that  has  been  carefully  studied,  many  cli- 
matic changes  have  taken  place,  apparently  quite  suddenly. 
This,  according  to  Hapgood,  is  explicable  if  the  virtually 
rigid  outer  crust  of  the  earth  undergoes,  from  time  to  time, 
extensive  displacement  over  the  viscous,  plastic,  possibly  fluid 
inner  layers.  Such  displacements  may  take  place  as  the  conse- 
quence of  comparatively  slight  forces  exerted  on  the  crust, 
derived  from  the  earth's  momentum  of  rotation,  which  in 
turn  will  tend  to  alter  the  axis  of  rotation  of  the  earth's  crust. 

In  a  polar  region  there  is  continual  deposition  of  ice,  which 
is  not  symmetrically  distributed  about  the  pole.  The  earth's 
rotation  acts  on  these  unsymmetrically  deposited  masses,  and 
produces  centrifugal  momentum  that  is  transmitted  to  the 
rigid  crust  of  the  earth.  The  constantly  increasing  centrifugal 
momentum  produced  in  this  way  will,  when  it  has  reached  a 
certain  point,  produce  a  movement  of  the  earth's  crust  over 
the  rest  of  the  earth's  body,  and  this  will  displace  the  polar 
regions  toward  the  equator. 

Without  a  doubt  the  earth's  crust  is  strong  enough  not  to 
give  way  proportionately  as  the  ice  is  deposited.  The  only 
doubtful  assumption  is  that  the  earth's  crust  can  be  moved 
easily  enough  over  the  inner  layers. 

The  author  has  not  confined  himself  to  a  simple  presenta- 


2  EARTHS     SHIFTING     CRUST 

tion  of  this  idea.  He  has  also  set  forth,  cautiously  and  compre- 
hensively, the  extraordinarily  rich  material  that  supports  his 
displacement  theory.  I  think  that  this  rather  astonishing,  even 
fascinating,  idea  deserves  the  serious  attention  of  anyone  who 
concerns  himself  with  the  theory  of  the  earth's  development. 
To  close  with  an  observation  that  has  occurred  to  me  while 
writing  these  lines:  If  the  earth's  crust  is  really  so  easily  dis- 
placed over  its  substratum  as  this  theory  requires,  then  the 
rigid  masses  near  the  earth's  surface  must  be  distributed  in 
such  a  way  that  they  give  rise  to  no  other  considerable  centrif- 
ugal momentum,  which  would  tend  to  displace  the  crust  by 
centrifugal  effect.  I  think  that  this  deduction  might  be  capa- 
ble of  verification,  at  least  approximately.  This  centrifugal 
momentum  should  in  any  case  be  smaller  than  that  produced 
by  the  masses  of  deposited  ice. 


AUTHOR'S  NOTE:  To  the  Layman  and  the  Specialist 

This  book  is  addressed  primarily  to  the  layman.  It  is  intended 
to  be  read  by  everyone  interested  in  the  earth  and  in  the  his- 
tory and  future  of  life  on  the  earth. 

I  believe  that  the  most  important  problems  of  science— that 
is,  the  most  fundamental  principles  of  scientific  thought  and 
method— may  be  understood  by  everyone.  I  think  it  is  the  ob- 
ligation of  scientists  to  make  these  essentials  clear,  for  only  in 
this  way  can  science  arouse  public  interest.  It  is  unquestion- 
able that  without  a  public  interest  science  cannot  flourish. 

The  impression  that  serious  scientific  problems  are  far  be- 
yond the  understanding  of  the  average  man  constitutes  a  seri- 
ous obstacle  to  the  growth  of  this  public  interest.  A  caste 
system  of  specialists  has  been  created,  and  it  has  produced  a 
sort  of  intellectual  defeatism,  so  that  the  layman  tends  to 
think  that  the  conclusions  he  can  reach  with  his  own  faculties 
are  invalid,  no  matter  how  carefully  he  examines  the  evi- 
dence. This  is  an  error  that  inhibits  the  spread  of  scientific 
knowledge  and  tends  to  discourage  the  recruitment  of  scien- 
tific workers,  for  every  scientist  has  been  an  amateur  to  start 
with. 

In  addressing  this  book  to  the  general  public,  I  hope  not 
only  to  promote  a  wider  discussion  of  the  basic  problems  of 
the  earth;  I  hope  also  that  from  such  increased  interest  will 
come  more  recruits  for  the  study  of  the  earth.  This  book  is 
addressed  also  to  the  youth  of  high  school  and  college  age, 
who,  in  my  opinion,  are  perfectly  capable  of  reaching  sound 
conclusions  on  the  evidence  set  forth  in  it.  From  many  of 
them,  in  the  course  of  teaching,  I  have  already  received  not 
only  an  enthusiastic  response,  but  active  and  practical  help. 

But  this  book  is  necessarily  addressed  also  to  the  specialists 
in  the  various  fields  with  which  it  deals.  These  include  geol- 
ogy, geophysics,  paleontology,  and  climatology.  It  is  precisely 


4  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

here  that  an  attitude  discovered  among  the  specialists  raises  a 
serious  problem.  There  is  a  natural  inclination  among  them 
to  consider,  each  one,  the  evidence  falling  within  his  own 
field  of  competence,  and  that  evidence  alone.  Necessarily,  if 
the  arguments  affecting  one  field  alone  are  considered,  and 
all  the  rest  are  put  aside,  the  weight  of  probability  for  the 
theory  is  very  greatly  reduced,  and  it  becomes  easy  to  con- 
clude that,  while  interesting,  it  need  not  be  taken  very  seri- 
ously. From  this  it  is  but  a  step  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
theory  had  better  be  proved  first  in  one  of  the  other  fields: 
it  will  then  be  soon  enough  to  invest  the  necessarily  consider- 
able amount  of  time,  effort,  and  expense  in  a  restudy  of  the 
basic  data  affected  by  the  new  theory  in  the  specialist's  own 
field. 

So  it  becomes  a  question  of  a  scientific  passing  of  the  buck: 
the  paleontologist  tends  to  look  to  the  geologist,  the  geologist 
to  the  geophysicist,  and  the  geophysicist  to  the  geologist,  for 
the  proof  of  the  theory. 

But  in  the  nature  of  the  case,  this  is  a  problem  for  all  the 
sciences  of  the  earth  together.  Here  the  specialists  must  be- 
come general  readers,  and  the  general  reader  must  take  on 
the  responsibility  of  the  scientist.  By  this  I  mean  that  the 
reader  must  examine  the  facts  presented  here  for  himself, 
and  draw  his  own  conclusions  without  looking  to  any  author- 
ity except  that  of  his  own  reason.  If  the  reader  will  do  that— 
and  I  now  include  the  specialists— I  have  no  fear  of  the  conse- 
quences. Either  he  will  accept  the  theory  presented  in  this 
book  or  he  will  be  inspired  to  look  for  a  better  one. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

When  it  comes  time  to  write  an  acknowledgment  of  the  assist- 
ance received  from  others  in  the  preparation  of  a  book,  this 
job  is  sometimes  accomplished  in  a  perfunctory  way;  it  is  a 
job  to  be  got  over  with  but,  at  the  same  time,  turned  to  ad- 
vantage. I  do  not  think  that  this  is  fair  to  the  essentially  social 
nature  of  science.  The  implication  is  usually  obvious  that  the 
book  is,  in  fact,  the  work  of  one  or  two  perspiring  and  in- 
spired persons,  who,  by  themselves  alone,  have  persevered 
against  odds  to  complete  an  imperishable  product.  This  dis- 
torts the  process  by  which  scientific  and,  indeed,  all  original 
work  is  done.  Scientific  research  is  essentially  and  profoundly 
social.  Discoveries  are  not  the  product  of  single  great  minds 
illuminating  the  darkness  where  ordinary  people  dwell; 
rather,  the  eminent  individuals  of  science  have  had  many 
predecessors;  they  themselves  have  been  merely  the  final  or- 
ganizers of  materials  prepared  by  others.  The  raw  materials, 
the  component  elements  that  have  made  these  great  achieve- 
ments possible,  have  been  contributed  by  hundreds  or  thou- 
sands of  people.  Every  step  in  the  making  of  this  book  has 
been  the  result  of  contact  with  other  minds.  The  work  done 
by  hundreds  of  writers  over  a  number  of  centuries  has  been 
exploited,  and  the  contributions  of  contemporary  writers 
have  been  carefully  examined.  The  product  represents,  I 
should  like  to  think,  a  synthesis  of  thought;  at  the  same  time 
I  hope  its  original  elements  will  prove  valid  additions  to  the 
common  stock  of  knowledge  in  the  field. 

Credit  for  the  initiation  of  the  research  that  led  to  this 
book  belongs,  in  the  first  instance,  to  students  in  my  classes 
at  Springfield  College,  in  Springfield,  Massachusetts.  A  ques- 
tion asked  me  by  Henry  Warrington,  a  freshman,  in  1949, 
stimulated  me  to  challenge  the  accepted  view  that  the  earth's 
surface  has  always  been  subject  only  to  very  gradual  change, 


6  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

and  that  the  poles  have  always  been  situated  precisely  where 
they  are  today.  As  the  inquiry  grew,  many  students  made 
valuable  contributions  to  it,  in  research  papers.  Among  these 
I  may  name,  in  addition  to  Warrington,  William  Lammers, 
Frank  Kenison,  Robert  van  Camp,  Walter  Dobrolet,  and 
William  Archer. 

Our  inquiry  first  took  organized  form  as  an  investigation 
of  the  ideas  of  Hugh  Auchincloss  Brown,  and  I  am  deeply 
indebted  to  him  for  his  original  sensational  suggestion  that 
icecaps  may  have  frequently  capsized  the  earth,  for  many  sug- 
gestions for  research  that  proved  to  be  productive,  for  his 
generosity  in  sharing  all  his  research  data  with  us,  and  for  his 
patience  in  answering  innumerable  letters. 

In  this  early  stage  of  our  inquiry,  when  I  was  in  every  sense 
an  amateur  in  many  fields  into  which  the  inquiry  led  me,  I 
received  invaluable  assistance  from  many  specialists.  These 
included  several  members  of  the  faculty  of  Springfield  Col- 
lege, especially  Professor  Errol  Buker,  without  whose  kindly 
sympathy  our  inquiry  would  have  been  choked  in  its  infancy. 
Assistance  with  many  serious  problems  was  received  from 
Dr.  Harlow  Shapley,  of  the  Harvard  Observatory,  Dr.  Dirk 
Brouwer,  of  the  Yale  Observatory,  Dr.  G.  M.  Clemence,  of 
the  Naval  Observatory,  and  a  number  of  distinguished  spe- 
cialists of  the  United  States  Coast  and  Geodetic  Survey. 

Our  inquiry,  in  its  third  year,  was  involved  in  a  difficulty 
that  appeared  to  be  insuperable,  and  from  this  dilemma  it 
was  rescued  by  an  inspired  suggestion  made  by  my  old  friend 
James  Hunter  Campbell,  who  thereafter  became  my  constant 
associate  in  the  research  project,  and  my  collaborator.  I  must 
give  credit  to  him  for  having  taken  hold  of  a  project  that  was 
still  an  amateur  inquiry,  and  transformed  it  into  a  solid  sci- 
entific project. 

When  Mr.  Campbell  had  developed  his  ideas  far  enough  to 
assure  us  that  the  idea  we  had  in  mind  was  essentially  sound, 
it  became  feasible  to  submit  the  results  of  our  joint  efforts  to 
Albert  Einstein,  and  we  found  him,  from  then  on,  a  most 
sympathetic  and  helpful  friend.  Throughout  an  extended 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  7 

correspondence,  and  in  personal  conference,  his  observations 
either  corroborated  our  findings  or  pointed  out  problems 
that  we  should  attempt  to  solve.  With  regard  to  our  inquiry, 
Einstein  made  an  exception  to  his  usual  policy,  which  was  to 
give  his  reactions  to  new  ideas  submitted  to  him,  but  not  to 
offer  his  suggestions  for  their  further  development.  In  our 
case,  with  an  uncanny  sense,  he  put  his  finger  directly  upon 
problems  that  were,  or  were  to  be,  most  baffling  to  us.  We 
had  the  feeling  that  he  deeply  understood  what  we  were  try- 
ing to  do,  and  desired  to  help  us.  Our  association  with  him 
represented  an  experience  of  the  spirit  as  well  as  of  the  mind. 

In  the  later  stages  of  our  inquiry,  many  distinguished  spe- 
cialists and  friends  helped  us  with  particular  problems.  Help- 
ful suggestions  have  been  contributed  by  Professor  Frank  C. 
Hibben,  of  the  University  of  New  Mexico,  Professor  Bridg- 
man,  of  Harvard,  Dr.  John  M.  Frankland,  of  the  Bureau  of 
Standards,  the  late  Dr.  George  Sarton,  Professors  Walter 
Bucher  and  Marshall  Kay  of  Columbia  University,  Dr.  John 
Scott,  Mrs.  Mary  G.  Grand,  Mr.  Walter  Breen,  Mr.  Stanley 
Rowe,  Dr.  Leo  Roberts,  Mr.  Ralph  Barton  Perry,  Jr.,  Mrs. 
Mary  Heaton  Vorse,  Mr.  Heaton  Vorse,  Mr.  Chauncey 
Hackett,  Mrs.  Helen  Bishop,  and  Mrs.  A.  Hyatt  Verrill.  To 
Dr.  Harold  Anthony,  of  the  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  our  debt  is  enormous.  It  was  he  who  afforded  Mr. 
Campbell  and  me  our  first  opportunity  of  discussing  our 
theories  with  a  group  of  specialists  in  the  earth  sciences,  when 
he  invited  us  to  talk  to  the  Discussion  Group  of  the  Museum. 
In  addition,  Dr.  Anthony  has  helpfully  criticized  parts  of  the 
manuscript,  and  has  helped  me  to  get  criticism  from  other 
experts.  Captain  Charles  Mayo,  of  Provincetown,  Massachu- 
setts, in  many  long  discussions  over  the  years,  has  contributed 
innumerable  valuable  suggestions. 

One  far-sighted  scientist  without  whose  generous  help  this 
book  in  its  present  form  would  have  been  impossible  is  Dr. 
David  B.  Ericson,  of  the  Lamont  Geological  Observatory.  He 
has  contributed  many  vitally  important  bibliographical  sug- 
gestions, has  corrected  numerous  technical  errors,  and  has 


8  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

provided  needed  moral  support.  I  am  equally  indebted  to 
Professor  Barry  Commoner,  of  Washington  University,  who 
not  only  read  the  manuscript  to  suggest  improvements  of 
content  and  style,  but  also  helped  me  in  the  preparation  of 
special  articles  for  publication  in  the  technical  journals.  Mr. 
Norman  A.  Jacobs,  editor  of  the  Yale  Scientific  Magazine, 
published  the  first  of  these  articles. 

During  the  last  year  I  have  received  enormous  assistance 
from  Mr.  Ivan  T.  Sanderson,  who,  as  a  biologist,  has  read  the 
manuscript  with  a  critical  eye  for  misuse  of  technical  vocabu- 
lary and  for  weaknesses  in  presentation.  I  have  received  in- 
valuable help  from  Professor  J.  C.  Brice,  of  Washington 
University,  who  has  criticized  the  whole  manuscript  from  a 
geological  standpoint.  I  am  deeply  indebted  to  my  aunt,  Mrs. 
Norman  Hapgood,  for  the  first  complete  translation  from  the 
Russian  of  the  report  of  the  Imperial  Academy  of  Sciences 
on  the  stomach  contents  of  the  Beresovka  Mammoth,  to  Mrs. 
Use  Politzer  for  the  translation  from  the  German  of  Ein- 
stein's letter  of  May  3,  1953,  and  to  Mrs.  Maely  Dufty  for 
assistance  with  the  translation  of  his  Foreword  into  English. 
To  many  personal  friends,  in  addition  to  those  mentioned,  I 
owe  thanks  for  encouragement  and  for  suggestions  that  often 
turned  out  to  have  major  importance.  I  am  indebted  to  John 
Langley  Howard  for  his  assistance  with  the  illustration  of 
this  book,  to  Mr.  Coburn  Gilman,  my  editor,  for  his  innum- 
erable constructive  suggestions  and  his  understanding  spirit, 
to  Mr.  Stanley  Abrons  for  his  painstaking  work  in  preparing 
the  Glossary,  and  to  Mr.  Walter  Breen  for  preparing  the  Index. 

In  the  final  typing  of  the  manuscript  Miss  Eileen  Sullivan 
has  had  to  encounter  and  survive  difficulties  and  frustrations 
that  only  she  and  I  can  have  an  idea  of.  I  am  very  gateful  for 
her  help. 

Grateful  thanks  are  extended  to  all  publishers  and  individ- 
uals who  have  consented  to  the  use  of  selections  or  illustra- 
tions, and  in  particular  to  the  following: 

Columbia  University  Press,  for  quotations  from  George  Gay- 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  9 

lord  Simpson,  Major  Features  of  Evolution;  Thomas  Y. 
Crowell  Co.,  for  a  passage  from  Frank  C.  Hibben,  The  Lost 
Americans;  Dover  Publications,  Inc.,  for  quotations  from 
Beno  Gutenberg,  Internal  Constitution  of  the  Earth  (paper- 
bound,  $245);  W.  H.  Freeman  8c  Co.,  for  quotations  from 
Krumbein  and  Sloss,  Stratigraphy  and  Sedimentation;  Alfred 
A.  Knopf,  Inc.,  for  quotations  from  Hans  Cloos,  Conversa- 
tions With  the  Earth;  N.  V.  Martinus  Nijhoff's  Boekhandel 
en  Uitgeversmaatschappij,  The  Hague,  for  quotations  from 
J.  H.  F.  Umbgrove,  The  Pulse  of  the  Earth;  Prentice-Hall, 
Inc.,  for  quotations  from  R.  A.  Daly,  The  Strength  and  Struc- 
ture of  the  Earth;  Science,  for  quotations  from  various  issues 
of  this  magazine;  William  Sloane  Associates,  Inc.,  for  quota- 
tions from  Thomas  R.  Henry,  The  White  Continent  (Copy- 
right 1950  by  Thomas  R.  Henry);  University  of  Chicago 
Press,  for  quotations  from  various  issues  of  the  Journal  of 
Geology. 

Charles  H.  Hapgood 
Keene  Teachers  College, 
October,  1957. 


INTRODUCTION:  A  New  Theory 


i.  Some  Unsolved  Problems 

A  few  years  ago  a  great  scientist,  Daly  of  Harvard,  remarked 
that  geologists  seem  to  know  less  about  the  earth  than  they 
thought  they  knew  when  he  was  a  young  man  (100).  This  was 
an  extraordinary  statement,  considering  the  very  detailed 
studies  that  have  been  carried  out  in  innumerable  geological 
fields  during  his  lifetime.  Thousands  of  scientists,  in  all  the 
countries  of  the  earth,  have  studied  the  stratified  rocks  and 
the  records  of  life  contained  in  them;  they  have  studied  the 
structures  of  mountains  and  reconstructed  their  histories; 
they  have  studied  the  dynamic  forces  at  work  in  the  earth, 
and  have  extended  our  insights  to  an  understanding  of  the 
features  of  the  ocean  bottoms  and  the  deeper  structures 
within  the  earth's  crust. 

Yet,  despite  this  vast  expansion  of  our  detailed  knowledge, 
many  of  the  essential  facts  of  the  earth's  development  have 
escaped  us.  The  late  Hans  Cloos,  in  his  Conversation  with 
the  Earthy  said,  ".  .  .  we  know  only  the  unimportant  things 
and  the  details.  Of  the  great  slow  strides  of  the  earth's  gigantic 
history  we  comprehend  hardly  anything  at  all"  (85:84). 

To  begin  with,  the  origin  of  the  earth  is  itself  still  a  matter 
of  dispute.  Until  about  thirty  years  ago  it  was  a  generally 
accepted  theory  that  it  originally  condensed  out  of  a  hot  gas, 
and  that  it  has  been  cooling  and  contracting  ever  since.  This 
was  the  "nebular  theory/'  In  recent  decades  difficulties  have 
piled  up  in  connection  with  this  assumption,  and  at  the  pres- 
ent time  an  entirely  opposite  view  is  held  by  many  geophysi- 

NOTE:  Figures  referring  to  specific  sources  listed  in  the  Bibliography  (p. 
396)  are  inserted  in  parentheses  throughout  the  text.  The  first  number  indi- 
cates the  correspondingly  numbered  work  in  the  Bibliography,  and  the  num- 
ber following  a  colon  indicates  the  page. 


INTRODUCTION  11 

cists.  The  new  idea  is  that  the  earth  may  have  started  as  a 
small,  cold  planetesimal.  It  may  have  grown  simply  by  attract- 
ing to  itself  many  smaller  particles,  such  as  meteorites  and 
meteoritic  dust.  It  may  have  grown  hot  as  a  result  of  the 
internal  pressures  caused  by  its  increasing  mass,  and  because 
of  the  effects  of  the  radioactivity  of  many  bits  of  the  matter  it 
picked  up  on  its  endless  journey  through  interstellar  space. 
Even  a  cursory  glance  at  the  current  literature  on  this  sub- 
ject reveals  the  formidable  character  of  the  challenge  it  pre- 
sents to  the  old  theory  and  indeed  to  the  whole  structure  of 
geological  theory  based  upon  it.  Dr.  Harold  C.  Uf ey  reaches 
the  conclusion,  from  impressive  evidence,  that  the  earth  must 
have  been  formed  at  temperatures  below  the  melting  points 
of  silicate  rocks  (437:112).  He  quotes  the  opinion  of  Bowen 
that  the  earth  was  formed  as  a  solid  (438:110).  Gutenberg 
refers  to  the  work  of  several  geophysicists  who  have  advanced 
similar  views  (194:191-92).  Olivier  argued,  in   1924,  that 
meteoric  phenomena  can  be  understood  only  in  terms  of  a 
growing  earth.  He  remarked,  "The  planetesimal  hypothesis 
is  the  one  to  which  we  are  logically  led  when  we  attempt  to 
explain  meteoric  phenomena"  (337:272).  Coleman  pointed 
to  evidence  that  some  of  the  ice  ages  in  remote  geological 
periods  seem  to  have  been  colder  than  those  of  the  more  re- 
cent past  (87:102).  Slichter,  summarizing  the  results  of  a  con- 
ference of  chemists,  geologists,  and  geophysicists  devoted  to 
this  subject,  said, 

...  In  accordance  with  recent  theories,  the  earth  probably  has 
grown  by  the  accretion  of  relatively  cool  materials  which  were  not 
molten  at  the  outset.  The  chemists  strongly  favored  the  cool  type  of 
origin.  .  .  .  Our  conceptions  of  the  development  of  the  primitive 
earth  are,  to  say  the  least,  obscure.  It  is  even  uncertain  whether  the 
earth  today  is  cooling  or  heating  at  depth,  but  the  odds  seem  to  favor 
the  hypothesis  of  a  heating  earth  (395:511-12). 

Inasmuch  as  it  seems  evident  that  neither  view  of  the 
origin  of  the  earth  has  been  established,  the  layman  is  forced 
to  conclude  that  the  problem  of  the  origin  of  the  earth  is 
unsolved. 


12  EARTH    S     SHIFTING     CRUST 

More  than  twenty-five  years  ago,  the  geologist  William  H. 
Hobbs  pointed  out  the  consequences  of  the  breakdown  of 
the  nebular  theory,  so  far  as  geology  was  concerned: 

Far  more  than  is  generally  supposed,  the  recent  abandonment  of 
the  nebular  hypothesis  to  account  for  the  origin  of  the  universe,  must 
carry  with  it  a  rewriting  of  our  science.  This  is  particularly  true  of 
geology,  for  all  that  concerns  seismology,  volcanology,  and  the  whole 
subject  of  the  growth  of  continents  and  mountains  (2i5:vii-viii). 

But  not  only  has  there  been  no  rewriting:  actually,  the 
very  abandonment  of  the  nebular  hypothesis  has  not  yet 
penetrated  to  the  consciousness  of  the  public.  It  is  even  true 
that  many  geologists,  when  they  are  addressing  their  remarks 
to  the  general  public,  write  as  if  the  cooling  of  the  earth  from 
an  original  molten  state  had  never  been  questioned. 

Within  the  frame  of  reference  of  this  uncertainty  regarding 
the  earth's  beginning,  most  geologists  today  unhesitatingly 
confess  that  we  do  not  understand  the  origin  of  continents, 
ocean  basins,  mountain  chains,  or  the  causes  of  volcanic  ac- 
tion. We  have  never  solved  the  mystery  of  ice  ages  in  the 
tropics,  nor  the  equally  strange  mystery  of  the  growth  of 
corals  and  warm-climate  flora  in  the  polar  zones.  There  is  a 
dispute  as  to  whether  the  present  climatic  zones  have  existed 
continuously  from  the  earth's  beginning.  If  so,  we  cannot 
account  at  all  for  the  greater  part  of  the  fossils  of  plants  and 
animals  of  the  past  that  did  not  live  within  the  limits  of  the 
present  zones.  If  the  zones  have  not  continuously  existed,  no 
one  has  been  able  to  show  what  factor  can  have  operated  to 
even  out  temperatures  from  pole  to  pole.  When  we  turn  to 
the  theory  of  evolution,  we  find  that  the  unsolved  problems 
of  origin,  development,  and  extinction  of  species  are  many 
and  basic.  Everybody  agrees  that  evolution  has  occurred,  but 
nobody  pretends  to  know  how  it  happened.  Our  ideas  of  the 
tempo  at  which  geological  change  has  occurred  in  the  past 
have  been  challenged  in  the  most  dramatic  fashion  by  new 
evidence  produced  by  techniques  of  dating  based  on  radio- 
active isotopes.  These  new  techniques  have  served  to  under- 
line and  emphasize  the  bankruptcy  of  the  present  theory  of 


INTRODUCTION  1$ 

the  earth.  They  have,  indeed,  created  many  more  problems 
than  they  have  solved. 

It  became  obvious  to  me,  as  I  reviewed  these  problems,  and 
went  back  over  the  controversies  that  had  marked  their  con- 
sideration, that  a  sort  of  common  denominator  was  present. 
I  examined  the  original  sources,  and  here  I  noticed  that  in 
the  controversies  that  have  raged  among  geologists  over  these 
separate  questions  in  the  last  seventy-five  years,  somebody 
usually  tried  to  explain  the  particular  problem  in  terms  of 
changes  in  the  position  of  the  poles.  This,  I  found,  was  the 
common  denominator.  The  authors  of  such  theories,  unfor- 
tunately, were  never  able  to  prove  their  assumptions.  The 
opponents  of  the  notion  of  polar  change  always  managed  to 
point  out  fallacies  that  seemed  decisive.  At  the  same  time,  no 
one  was  able  to  reconcile  all  the  evidence  in  the  different 
fields  with  the  idea  that  the  poles  have  always  been  situated 
where  they  are  now  on  the  earth's  surface. 

The  theory  here  presented  would  solve  these  problems  by 
supposing  changes  in  the  positions  of  the  poles.  Campbell  has 
suggested  that  the  changes  have  occurred  not  by  reason  of 
changes  in  the  position  of  the  earth's  axis,  but  simply  through 
a  sliding  of  its  crust.  There  is  nothing  new  about  this  idea. 
It  has  been  brought  forward  repeatedly  over  the  last  seventy- 
five  years,  and  is  advocated  today  by  a  number  of  scientists. 
This  book  brings  together,  I  hope  in  comprehensible  form, 
the  evidence  from  many  fields  that  argues  for  such  shifts,  evi- 
dence in  many  cases  accumulated  by  others.  In  addition,  it 
contains  a  new  element.  Campbell's  concept  of  the  mecha- 
nism by  which  movements  of  the  earth's  crust  are  accounted 
for  is  completely  new,  although  elements  of  it  have  been  con- 
tributed by  others. 


2.  Crust  Displacement  as  a  Solution 

To  understand  what  is  involved  in  the  idea  of  a  movement, 
or  displacement,  of  the  entire  crust  of  the  earth,  certain  facts 


14  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

about  the  earth  must  be  understood.  The  crust  is  very  thin. 
Estimates  of  its  thickness  range  from  a  minimum  of  about 
twenty  to  a  maximum  of  about  forty  miles.  The  crust  is  made 
of  comparatively  rigid,  crystalline  rock,  but  it  is  fractured  in 
many  places,  and  does  not  have  great  strength.  Immediately 
under  the  crust  is  a  layer  that  is  thought  to  be  extremely 
weak,  because  it  is,  presumably,  too  hot  to  crystallize.  More- 
over, it  is  thought  that  pressure  at  that  depth  renders  the 
rock  extremely  plastic,  so  that  it  will  yield  easily  to  pressures. 
The  rock  at  that  depth  is  supposed  to  have  high  viscosity; 
that  is,  it  is  fluid  but  very  stiff,  as  tar  may  be.  It  is  known  that 
a  viscous  material  will  yield  easily  to  a  comparatively  slight 
pressure  exerted  over  a  long  period  of  time,  even  though  it 
may  act  as  a  solid  when  subjected  to  a  sudden  pressure,  such 
as  an  earthquake  wave.  If  a  gentle  push  is  exerted  horizon- 
tally on  the  earth's  crust,  to  shove  it  in  a  given  direction,  and 
if  the  push  is  maintained  steadily  for  a  long  time,  it  is  highly 
probable  that  the  crust  will  be  displaced  over  this  plastic  and 
viscous  lower  layer.  The  crust,  in  this  case,  will  move  as  a 
single  unit,  the  whole  crust  at  the  same  time.  This  idea  has 
nothing  whatever  to  do  with  the  much  discussed  theory  of 
drifting  continents,  according  to  which  the  continents  drifted 
separately,  in  different  directions.  The  objections  to  the  drift- 
ing continent  theory  will  be  discussed  later. 

Let  us  visualize  briefly  the  consequences  of  a  displacement 
of  the  whole  crustal  shell  of  the  earth.  First,  there  will  be  the 
changes  in  latitude.  Places  on  the  earth's  surface  will  change 
their  distances  from  the  equator.  Some  will  be  shifted  nearer 
the  equator,  and  others  farther  away.  Points  on  opposite  sides 
of  the  earth  will  move  in  opposite  directions.  For  example,  if 
New  York  should  be  moved  2,000  miles  south,  the  Indian 
Ocean,  diametrically  opposite,  would  have  to  be  shifted  2,000 
miles  north.  All  points  on  the  earth's  surface  will  not  move 
an  equal  distance,  however.  To  visualize  this,  the  reader  need 
only  take  a  globe,  mounted  on  its  stand,  and  set  it  in  rotation. 
He  will  see  that  while  a  point  on  its  equator  is  moving  fast, 
the  points  nearest  the  poles  are  moving  slowly.  In  a  given 


INTRODUCTION  15 

time,  a  point  near  the  equator  moves  much  farther  than  one 
near  a  pole.  So,  in  a  displacement  of  the  crust,  there  is  a  me- 
ridian around  the  earth  that  represents  the  direction  of  the 
movement,  and  points  on  this  circle  will  be  moved  farthest. 
Two  points  go  degrees  away  from  this  line  will  represent  the 
"pivot  points'*  of  the  movement.  All  other  points  will  be  dis- 
placed proportionally  to  their  distances  from  this  meridian. 
Naturally,  climatic  changes  will  be  more  or  less  proportionate 
to  changes  in  latitude,  and,  because  areas  on  opposite  sides 
of  the  globe  will  be  moving  in  opposite  directions,  some 
areas  will  be  getting  colder  while  others  get  hotter;  some  will 
be  undergoing  radical  changes  of  climate,  some  mild  changes 
of  climate,  and  some  no  changes  at  all. 

Along  with  the  climatic  changes,  there  will  be  many  other 
consequences  of  a  displacement  of  the  crust.  Because  of  the 
slight  flattening  of  the  earth,  there  will  be  stretching  and 
compressional  effects  to  crack  and  fold  the  crust,  possibly 
contributing  to  the  formation  of  mountain  ranges.  There 
will  be  changes  in  sea  level,  and  many  other  consequences.  In 
this  book  the  potential  consequences  will  be  discussed  in  de- 
tail, and  evidence  presented  to  show  that  such  displacements 
have  frequently  occurred  in  the  earth's  history,  and  that  they 
provide  an  acceptable  solution  to  the  problems  I  have  men- 
tioned above.1 


3.  A  Possible  Cause  of  Crust  Displacement 

Some  years  ago  Mr.  Hugh  Auchincloss  Brown,  an  engineer, 
developed  a  theory  that  great  polar  icecaps  might  shift  the 
poles  by  capsizing  or  careening  the  earth  as  a  whole.  He  had  a 
simple  idea,  suggested  by  his  engineering  experience.  This 
was  the  concept  of  the  centrifugal  effect  that  may  arise  from 

i  To  follow  the  argument  presented  in  this  book,  the  reader  will  find  it  help- 
ful to  use  a  globe.  A  small  one  will  do.  A  globe  is  better  than  flat  maps  for 
the  purpose  of  following  the  many  simultaneous  changes  involved  in  a  dis- 
placement of  the  crust. 


i6  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

the  rotation  of  a  body,  if  the  body  is  not  perfectly  centered 
on  its  axis  of  rotation.  Everyone  has  seen  examples  of  the 
operation  of  centrifugal  force.  The  principle  can  be  demon- 
strated by  the  ordinary  washing  machine.  I  once  put  a  heavy 
rug,  all  rolled  up  into  a  compact  ball,  into  a  washing  ma- 
chine, and  of  course  when  the  machine  was  set  in  motion  all 
the  weight  remained  on  one  side  of  the  axle.  The  rotation 
produced  a  very  powerful  sidewise  heave.  The  centrifugal 
effect  was  sufficient  to  rip  the  bolts  up  out  of  what  had  been 
a  fine  antique  floor.  Engineers  know  that  the  slightest  inac- 
curacy in  the  centering  of  a  rapidly  rotating  mass,  such  as  a 
flywheel,  can  result  in  shattering  the  rotating  body. 

Brown  pointed  out  that  a  polar  icecap  is  an  enormous  body 
placed  on  the  earth's  surface,  and  not  perfectly  centered  on 
the  axis  of  rotation.  It  must  therefore  create  centrifugal 
effects,  tending  to  unbalance  the  earth.  He  called  attention  to 
certain  facts  about  Antarctica.  Antarctica  is  a  large  continent, 
about  twice  the  size  of  the  United  States.  It  is  almost  entirely 
covered  by  ice,  and  the  ice  is  enormously  thick.  Antarctica 
contains  many  great  mountain  chains,  some  of  them  compara- 
ble to  the  Alps  or  the  Rocky  Mountains,  but  the  ice  is  so 
thick  that  it  reaches  the  tops  of  most  of  them,  and  sweeps  over 
them.  The  ice  sheet  is  thought  to  average  a  mile  in  thickness, 
and  it  may  be  twice  as  thick  in  places.  It  may  contain  as  much 
as  6,000,000  cubic  miles  of  ice.  Much  of  this  ice  is  an  extra 
weight  on  the  earth's  crust  because  it  has  accumulated  so  fast 
that  there  has  been  insufficient  time  for  the  earth's  crust  to 
sink  and  adapt  to  it.  As  we  shall  see,  Brown's  surmise  that  the 
Antarctic  icecap  has  developed  rapidly,  and  is  growing  even 
now  (rather  than  retreating),  is  well  supported  by  much  re- 
cent evidence. 

With  respect  to  the  eccentricity  of  this  mass,  Brown 
pointed  out  that  the  earth  is  known  to  wobble  slightly  on  its 
axis.  The  wobble  amounts  to  about  fifty  feet,  and  the  earth 
completes  one  wobble  in  about  fourteen  months.  This  means 
that  the  whole  planet,  including  the  icecap,  is  always  off 
center  by  about  that  amount.  Brown  thought  that  this  slight 


INTRODUCTION  1? 

eccentricity  would,  because  of  the  enormous  mass  of  the  ice- 
cap, produce  a  great  centrifugal  effect  tending  to  unbalance 
the  globe.  He  made  some  mathematical  calculations  to  show 
the  possible  magnitude  of  the  effect.  He  suggested  that,  at 
some  point,  the  icecap  would  grow  so  large  that  the  centrif- 
ugal effect  would  suffice  to  shatter  the  crust  in  the  earth's 
equatorial  bulge,  and  permit  the  earth  to  wobble  farther  off 
center.  Then  the  increasing  radius  of  eccentricity  would 
cause  an  increase  of  the  centrifugal  effect  by  arithmetical 
progression,  until  the  earth  capsized.  He  likened  the  earth's 
equatorial  bulge— its  slightly  greater  diameter  through  the 
equator—to  a  flywheel,  which  would  be  shattered  by  the  cen- 
trifugal effect  of  the  icecap. 

When  I  first  began  to  study  Brown's  ideas,  I  examined  his 
two  basic  assumptions  with  some  care.  The  first  was  the  as- 
sumption of  the  centrifugal  effect  of  bodies  rotating  off 
center,  and  that  was  sound  enough.  The  second  was  the 
assumption  that  the  equatorial  bulge  acted  as  a  stabilizing 
flywheel  to  keep  the  earth  steady  on  its  axis.  The  investiga- 
tion of  this  assumption  involved  long  research.  I  finally  found 
unequivocal  support  for  Brown's  contention  in  the  works  of 
James  Clerk  Maxwell  and  obtained  further  confirmation  of 
it  in  correspondence  with  Dr.  Harlow  Shapley,  of  the  Har- 
vard Observatory,  Dr.  Dirk  Brouwer,  of  the  Yale  Observa- 
tory, and  Dr.  Harold  Jeffreys,  of  Cambridge  University, 
England. 

I  now  sought  to  find,  if  I  could,  the  ratio  of  the  unstabiliz- 
ing  centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap  to  the  stabilizing  effect  of 
the  bulge.  It  was  clear  that  the  force  of  the  icecap  would 
either  have  to  overcome  the  total  stabilizing  centrifugal  effect 
of  the  bulge,  or  it  would  have  to  shatter  the  crust,  so  that  the 
earth  could  start  to  rotate  farther  off  center,  thereby  initi- 
ating a  chain  reaction  of  increasing  centrifugal  effects. 

The  first  task  was  to  estimate  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the 
icecap.  Here  I  thought  that  Brown  had  committed  an  over- 
sight, to  the  disadvantage  of  his  own  theory.  He  considered 
die  eccentricity  of  the  icecap  to  be  due  to  the  earth's  fifty-foot 


i8 


EARTH    S     SHIFTING     CRUST 


wobble.  I  saw,  on  looking  at  the  map,  what  seemed  to  me  a 
much  greater  eccentricity.  It  was  obvious  that  the  South  Pole 
was  not  at  all  in  the  center  of  the  continent.  This  being  so, 
then  the  icecap,  which  covers  virtually  all  the  continent, 
could  not  be  centered  at  the  pole.  It  seemed  to  me  that  the 


90*WEST   FROM  GREENWICH 


96'      90%EAST  FROM  GREENWICH 


Fig.  I.    The  Centrifugal  Effect  of  the  Antarctic  Icecap 

To  visualize  the  centrifugal  effect  that  may  be  caused  by  the  Antarctic 
icecap,  the  reader  should  imagine  the  map  of  Antarctica  actually  rotat- 
ing. The  continent  of  Antarctica  makes  one  complete  rotation  every 


INTRODUCTION  19 

first  step  must  be  to  locate  the  geographical  center  of  mass 
of  the  Antarctic  icecap,  and  then  to  apply  the  standard  for- 
mula used  in  mechanics  to  determine  the  centrifugal  effect. 
I  asked  my  friend,  Errol  Buker,  of  the  Springfield  College 
faculty,  to  locate  the  geographical  center.  He  and  later  Mr. 
Campbell  each  separately  solved  the  problem,  and  obtained 
closely  similar  results.  It  appeared  that  the  center  was  be- 
tween 300  and  345  miles  from  the  pole,  allowing  a  margin 
of  error  for  the  uncertainties  involved  in  the  present  state  of 
Antarctic  exploration.  This,  of  course,  involved  a  centrifugal 
effect  thousands  of  times  greater  than  that  which  could  be 
derived  from  Brown's  assumptions.  On  this  basis  Buker  calcu- 
lated the  centrifugal  effect,  and  the  calculation  was  later  re- 
vised by  Campbell  (Chapter  XI).  The  calculation  applied  to 
the  present  Antarctic  icecap  only.  The  ice  around  the  North 
Pole  could  be  disregarded  because,  except  for  the  Greenland 
cap,  it  is  merely  a  thin  shell  of  floating  ice.  The  presence  of 
the  Arctic  Ocean  prevents  any  thick  accumulation  of  ice. 

twenty-four  hours  with  the  rotation  of  the  earth,  and  this  is  what  causes 
the  centrifugal  effect. 

The  point  at  the  intersection  of  the  two  meridians  is  the  South  Pole. 
This  is  one  end  of  the  axis  on  which  the  earth  rotates.  The  small  circle 
drawn  about  this  point  is  shown  passing  through  an  off-center  point 
about  five  degrees  (or  345  miles)  from  the  pole.  This  point  is,  so  far  as 
we  can  now  estimate,  the  geographical  center  of  mass  of  the  icecap, 
which  does  not  coincide  with  the  South  Pole  because  of  the  asymmetric 
shape  of  the  continent. 

The  two  larger  circles,  one  drawn  about  the  pole  as  a  center  and  one 
drawn  about  the  icecap's  eccentrically  located  center  of  mass,  are  a  me- 
chanical convention  used  by  engineers  to  illustrate  the  centrifugal  effects 
of  off-center  rotation.  If  the  map  is  visualized  as  rotating,  the  inner 
circle  drawn  about  the  pole  represents  the  earth  in  stable  rotation,  while 
the  outer  circle,  drawn  about  the  center  of  the  icecap,  is  undergoing 
violent  eccentric  gyration.  The  eccentricity  results  in  an  outward  cen- 
trifugal "throw"  in  the  direction  of  the  meridian  of  96°  E.  Long.  The 
two  arrows  show  how  the  force  of  the  earth's  rotation  is  transformed 
into  a  centrifugal  effect  at  right  angles  to  trie  earth's  axis,  an  effect  pro- 
portional to  the  weight  of  the  ice  and  the  distance  of  its  center  of  mass 
from  the  axis. 


2O  EARTH'S     SHIFTING     CRUST 

The  second  problem  was  to  measure  the  stabilizing  cen- 
trifugal effect  of  the  bulge.  Since  there  was  no  record  of  any 
work  having  been  done  previously  on  this  problem,  it  was 
necessary  to  work  it  all  out  from  fundamentals.  It  involved 
difficult  physical  and  mathematical  problems.  Here  I  was 
extremely  fortunate  in  obtaining  the  generous  co-operation 
of  several  of  the  distinguished  specialists  of  the  United  States 
Coast  and  Geodetic  Survey.  They  gave  me  a  calculus  with 
which  Mrs.  Whittaker  Deininger,  of  the  Smith  College  fac- 
ulty, obtained  a  quantity  for  the  stabilizing  effect  of  the 
bulge. 

Now  we  had  two  quantities  that  could  be  compared  with 
each  other:  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap,  tending  to 
upset  the  earth,  and  the  stabilizing  effect  of  the  bulge.  Unfor- 
tunately for  the  theory  as  it  then  stood,  it  appeared  that  the 
stabilizing  effect  of  the  bulge  was  greater  than  the  eccentric 
effect  of  the  icecap  by  several  thousand  times. 

There  is  no  question  that  this  result,  had  it  come  earlier, 
would  have  brought  the  investigation  to  an  end.  But  my  geo- 
logical research  had  been  proceeding  actively  for  more  than 
two  years  and  had  produced  such  impressive  evidence  that  I 
felt  much  opposed  to  the  complete  abandonment  of  the  proj- 
ect. I  discussed  the  difficulty  that  had  arisen  with  my  friend 
Campbell.  It  was  indeed  fortunate  that  I  did  so,  for  the  solu- 
tion came  from  him  when  he  suggested  that  if  the  icecap  did 
not  have  sufficient  force  to  careen  the  whole  planet,  it  might 
have  sufficient  force  to  displace  the  earth's  crust  over  the 
underlying  layers.  As  a  sequel  to  this  conversation,  Mr. 
Campbell  continued  to  work,  for  a  number  of  years,  on  the 
implications  of  his  suggestion.  The  details  of  his  mechanism 
to  account  for  crust  displacement  are  presented  in  Chapter 
XI. 

The  hypothesis  that  has  emerged  as  the  result  of  this  com- 
bination of  elements  is  distinguished  by  its  economy  of  as- 
sumptions. It  appealed  to  Albert  Einstein  because  of  its 
simplicity.  It  appeared  to  him  that  it  might  be  possible,  on 
the  basis  of  the  simple  common  denominator  of  this  theory 


INTRODUCTION  21 

of  displacement,  to  solve  the  many  complex  and  interrelated 
problems  of  the  earth  that  have  so  long  resisted  solution. 

The  simplicity  of  the  idea  may  raise  the  suspicion  that  it 
can  hardly  be  so  very  new.  How  can  anything  so  extremely 
simple  as  the  application  of  the  formula  for  calculating  cen- 
trifugal effects,  a  formula  which  appears  in  every  high-school 
textbook  of  physics,  to  a  polar  icecap,  have  been  completely 
overlooked?  This  thought  occurred  to  me,  but  I  found  to 
my  surprise  that,  despite  the  simplicity  of  the  idea,  it  was 
one  that  had  never  been  investigated.  When  I  first  discussed 
it  with  Professor  Bridgman,  at  Harvard,  he  had  the  impres- 
sion that  it  was  a  good  idea;  he  called  it  a  real  problem,  but 
he  said  he  could  not  believe  that  it  had  never  been  consid- 
ered by  science.  He  suggested  that  I  take  it  up  with  Pro- 
fessor Daly.  I  did  so,  and  Professor  Daly  agreed  that  it  was  a 
real  problem,  but  assured  me  that  it  had  never,  to  his  knowl- 
edge, been  investigated.  And  so  it  turned  out.  I  have  looked 
pretty  far  through  the  technical  literature  and  have  found  no 
studies  covering  it.  Dr.  George  Sarton,  the  historian  of  sci- 
ence, confirmed  this  finding  when  he  wrote  me  that  "the 
combination  of  ideas  is  so  new  that  the  history  of  science  has 
nothing  to  contribute  to  its  understanding"  (p.  391). 

This  book  has  been  written  with  three  objectives  in  mind. 
I  have  sought,  in  the  first  place,  to  establish  beyond  a  reason- 
able doubt  that  numerous  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust 
have  occurred.  I  think  that  this  idea  may  now  be  accepted 
without  too  much  difficulty,  especially  in  view  of  much  recent 
work  in  the  field  of  terrestrial  magnetism.  Secondly,  I  have 
tried  to  describe  a  mechanism  to  account  for  displacements 
(this  is  essentially  the  work  of  Mr.  Campbell)  and  to  present 
evidence  showing  that  this  mechanism  alone  can  account  for 
the  facts.  My  third  purpose  has  been  to  show  that  the  hy- 
pothesis of  crust  displacement  provides  an  acceptable  solu- 
tion of  many  of  the  problems  of  the  earth. 

It  is  quite  natural  that  at  first  numerous  objections  should 
be  raised  to  this  theory.  In  our  correspondence  with  special- 
ists the  principal  issues  that  have  come  up  to  raise  doubts 


22  EARTH'S     SHIFTING     CRUST 

include  the  following:  whether  we  have  properly  estimated 
the  magnitude  of  the  centrifugal  effect;  whether  there  is  any 
layer  below  the  crust  weak  enough  to  permit  crust  displace- 
ment; whether  the  Antarctic  icecap  is  really  growing,  as  the 
theory  requires,  or  is  in  retreat;  whether  the  centrifugal  effect 
we  postulate  would  not  in  practice  merely  cause  the  icecap  to 
flow  off  from  the  Antarctic  continent  into  the  sea,  rather  than 
transmit  its  push  to  the  crust;  whether  the  thrust  of  the  ice- 
cap, if  it  was  transmitted  to  the  crust,  would  be  transmitted  to 
the  crust  as  a  whole,  as  the  theory  requires,  or  would  be  ab- 
sorbed in  local  readjustments  of  the  crust;  whether,  if  both 
the  poles  happened  to  fall  in  water  areas,  icecaps  would  not 
cease  to  develop,  and  thus  the  whole  process  of  crust  displace- 
ment be  brought  to  an  end;  why,  if  crust  displacements  have 
been  frequent  in  geological  history,  there  are  not  evidences 
of  more  icecaps  in  the  geological  record;  why,  with  that  as- 
sumption, we  find  some  rock  formations  that  appear  to  have 
been  undisturbed  since  the  earliest  times.  All  these  objec- 
tions, and  many  more,  are  fully,  and  I  hope  fairly,  discussed 
in  the  following  chapters.  Therefore,  if  the  reader  finds  him- 
self asking  questions  that  do  not  appear  to  be  answered,  I 
hope  he  will  have  patience.  He  may  find  that  they  are  an- 
swered in  later  parts  of  the  book. 


INTRODUCTION 


TABLE   I 


The  Geological  Periods 

(After  Krumbein  and  Sloss,  258:15) 


ERA 

Cenozoic 


Mesozoic 


Paleozoic 


Pre-Cambrian 


PERIOD 

Quaternary 

Tertiary 


Cretaceous 
Jurassic 

(Liassic) 
Triassic 

(Thaetic) 

Permian 
Pennsylvanian 

(Carboniferous) 
Mississippian 
Devonian 
Silurian 
Ordovician 
Cambrian 

Keweenawan 
Huronian 
Tamiskamian 
Kewatinian 


EPOCH 

Present 
Pleistocene 

Pliocene 
Miocene 
Oligocene 
Eocene 

(Paleocene) 


I  :  PAST  THEORIES  OF  POLAR  SHIFT 


/.  Older  Theories 

Of  all  the  questions  that  have  been  debated  in  the  sciences  o£ 
the  earth,  perhaps  the  most  fundamental  and  the  most  in- 
volved is  that  of  the  stability  of  the  poles.  This  question  has 
bedevilled  science  for  about  a  hundred  years.  Despite  every 
effort  to  establish  the  view  that  the  poles  have  shifted  during 
the  history  of  the  earth,  or  to  prove  that  they  have  not,  the 
controversy  is  just  as  lively  today  as  ever.  In  fact,  discussion 
of  the  issue  has  become  much  more  active  during  the  last 
decade.  The  new  evidence  bearing  on  this  question,  as  we 
shall  see,  now  strongly  favors  the  idea  of  polar  shift. 

When  the  term  "polar  shift"  is  used,  it  may  have  several 
meanings.  It  may  mean  a  change  of  the  position  of  the  earth's 
axis,  with  reference  to  the  stars.  Everyone  has  seen  pictures 
of  the  solar  system,  with  the  earth,  planets,  and  sun  shown  in 
relationship  to  one  another.  The  earth  is  always  shown 
slightly  tipped.  Its  axis  does  not  run  straight  up  and  down  at 
right  angles  to  the  plane  of  the  sun's  equator,  but  slants  at 
an  angle. 

Now,  there  is  no  doubt  but  that  any  change  in  the  position 
of  this  axis  would  be  very  important  to  us.  It  might  mean, 
for  example,  that  the  South  Pole  would  point  directly  at  the 
sun.  We  would  then  have  one  hot  pole  and  one  cold  pole. 
The  hot  pole  would  never  have  any  night,  and  the  cold  pole 
would  never  have  any  day.  The  occurrence  of  this  kind  of 
polar  shift  has  seldom  been  supposed,  for  the  reason  that  no 
force  capable  of  shifting  the  axis  has  ever  been  imagined, 
other  than,  possibly,  a  major  interplanetary  collision. 

A  second  cause  of  the  shifting  of  the  poles  with  reference  to 
points  on  the  earth's  surface  would  be  a  change  in  the  posi- 
tion of  the  whole  planet  on  its  axis,  without  change  of  the 


PAST    THEORIES    OF     POLAR    SHIFT  25 

position  of  the  axis.  The  axis  would  point  in  the  same  direc- 
tion—toward the  same  stars— but  by  a  careening  motion  of 
the  planet  other  points  would  be  brought  to  the  poles.  Not 
the  axis,  but  the  whole  planet,  would  have  moved  or  swivelled 
around.  This  is  the  sort  of  change  proposed  by  Brown. 

As  I  have  already  mentioned,  the  principal  obstacle  to  a 
shift  of  the  earth  on  its  axis  lies  in  the  existence  of  the  earth's 
equatorial  bulge,  which  acts  like  the  stabilizing  rim  of  a  gyro- 
scope. The  early  writers  on  this  question,  such  as  Maxwell 
(296)  and  George  H.  Darwin  (105),  all  recognized  that  a 
shifting  of  the  planet  on  its  axis  to  any  great  extent  would  re- 
quire a  force  sufficient  to  overcome  the  stabilizing  effect  of 
the  bulge.  But  they  were  unable  to  see  what  could  give  rise 
to  such  a  force,  and  dismissed  the  idea  of  a  shift  of  the  planet 
on  its  axis  as  utterly  impossible  and,  in  fact,  not  worth  dis- 
cussing. 

This,  however,  left  the  evidence  unaccounted  for,  and  such 
evidence,  from  many  sources,  continued  to  accumulate.  Forti- 
fied by  their  very  strong  conviction  that  a  shift  of  the  planet 
on  its  axis  was  impossible,  astronomers  and  geologists  in- 
sisted that  all  this  evidence,  such  as  fossil  corals  from  the 
Arctic  Ocean,  coal  beds  and  fossil  water  lilies  from  Spitz- 
bergen,  and  many  other  evidences  of  warm  climates  in  the 
vicinity  of  both  the  poles,  simply  must  be  interpreted  in  ac- 
cordance with  the  assumption  that  the  poles  had  never 
changed  their  positions  on  the  face  of  the  earth.  This  placed 
quite  a  strain  upon  generations  of  geologists,  but  their  imagi- 
nations were  usually  equal  to  the  task.  They  were  fertile  in 
inventing  theories  to  account  for  warm  climates  in  the  polar 
zones  at  the  required  times,  but  these  theories  were  never 
based  on  substantial  evidence.  Moreover,  they  never  ex- 
plained more  than  a  small  number  of  the  facts,  while  essen- 
tially they  conflicted  with  common  sense.  We  shall  have 
occasion  to  return  to  them  again  in  later  chapters,  where  the 
statements  I  have  just  made  will  be  fully  documented. 

The  discontent  of  the  biologists  and  paleontologists,  who 
were  constantly  finding  fossil  fauna  and  flora  in  the  wrong 


s6  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

places,  finally  boiled  over,  and  resulted  in  a  number  of  new 
theories  for  polar  change.  New  proposals  were  .frequently  ad- 
vanced in  the  i88o's  and  iSgo's  and  later,  but  they  were  met 
by  the  unyielding  resistance  of  the  highest  authorities,  basing 
themselves  on  the  positions  taken  by  the  persons  already 
mentioned.  Moreover,  it  was  easy  to  show  defects  and  contra- 
dictions in  these  various  theories,  and  to  discredit  them,  one 
after  another.  All  the  assaults  were  successfully  beaten  back, 
except  one. 


2.  The  Wegener  Theory 

The  exception  proved  to  be  the  theory  of  Alfred  von  We- 
gener. The  latter  was  a  good  scientist,  though  not  a  geologist. 
He  was  unwilling  to  be  satisfied  with  theories  that  would 
account  for  only  a  few  of  the  facts.  He  had  a  passion  for 
broad,  inclusive  principles  supported  by  tangible  evidence. 
He  found  quantities  of  evidence  that  could  not,  in  his  opin- 
ion, be  reconciled  with  the  present  positions  of  the  poles. 
Inasmuch  as  the  doctrine  of  polar  permanence  (and  it  was  a 
doctrine  any  challenge  to  which  evoked  remarkable  fury 
from  recognized  authorities)  forbade  any  thought  that  the 
poles  themselves  had  moved,  or  that  the  earth  had  shifted  on 
its  axis,  Wegener  suggested  that  the  continents  had  moved. 
This  would  have  precisely  the  same  effect,  for  it  would  mean 
that,  at  different  times,  different  areas  would  be  found  at  the 
poles.  And  this  was,  in  effect,  a  third  way  to  account  for  shift- 
ings  of  the  geographical  locations  of  the  poles. 

Wegener  imagined  that  the  continents,  formed  of  light 
granitic  and  sedimentary  rocks,  had  once  composed  a  single 
land  mass,  but  had  been  split  and  set  in  motion,  drifting  over 
a  plastic  substratum  of  the  continents  and  oceans.  He  thought 
of  this  sublayer  as  really  plastic  and  viscous,  rather  than 
rigid  and  strong.  From  a  vast  amount  of  fossil  evidence  of 
the  plant  and  animal  life  of  the  past,  he  imagined  that  he 
could  reconstruct  the  actual  paths  of  the  continents  over 


PAST    THEORIES    OF     POLAR    SHIFT  2? 

long  periods  of  time.  He  proposed  to  explain  the  ice  ages  by 
this  theory;  he  suggested  that  during  the  last  ice  age  in  the 
Northern  Hemisphere,  Europe  and  America  had  lain  close 
together  near  the  pole  but  that,  since  then,  they  had  drifted 
apart. 

Wegener's  theory  had  great  appeal.  This  was  not  because 
all  of  the  evidence  supported  it,  nor  because  its  mechanics 
were  very  plausible,  but  because  it  was  the  only  theory  that, 
at  the  time,  could  make  sense  of  the  evidence  of  the  fossil 
flora  and  fauna. 

There  were  a  number  of  weaknesses  in  the  structure  of 
this  theory.  One  of  these  was  that  the  evidence  from  different 
areas,  for  the  same  geological  period,  would  not  produce 
agreement  as  to  where  the  poles  were  situated  at  a  given  time. 
Chancy,  for  example,  wrote,  "It  is  amusing  to  note  .  .  .  that 
in  taking  care  of  their  Tertiary  forests,  certain  Europeans 
have  condemned  ours  to  freezing.  .  .  ."  (72:484). 

Wegener  recognized  the  seriousness  of  this  difficulty: 

Although  the  grounds  for  the  shifting  of  the  poles  (in  certain 
periods  of  the  earth's  history)  are  so  compelling,  nevertheless  it  can- 
not be  denied  that  all  previous  attempts  to  fix  the  positions  of  the 
poles  continuously  throughout  the  whole  geological  succession  have 
always  led  to  self-contradiction,  and  indeed  to  contradiction  of  so  gro- 
tesque a  kind  that  it  is  not  to  be  wondered  at  that  the  suspicion  arises 
that  the  assumption  of  the  shifting  of  the  poles  is  built  on  a  fallacy 
(45°:94-95)- 

This  difficulty,  basic  as  it  was,  was  by  no  means  the  worst. 
By  various  methods  the  knowledge  of  the  structure  of  the 
earth's  crust  was  extended,  and  it  was  finally  found  that  the 
rock  under  the  oceans,  which  Wegener  had  thought  to  be 
plastic  enough  for  the  continents  to  drift  over  it,  is  in  fact 
very  rigid.  This  means  that  the  continents  cannot  drift  with- 
out displacing  a  layer  of  rigid  rock  under  the  oceans,  a  layer 
thought  to  be  at  least  twenty  miles  thick  and  comparatively 
strong.  It  is  therefore  impossible  for  the  continents  to  drift. 
Dr.  Harold  Jeffreys,  the  noted  geophysicist,  basing  his  opin- 
ion on  the  evidence  for  a  rigid  and  comparatively  strong 


28  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

ocean  floor,  said,  ".  .  .  There  is  therefore  not  the  slightest 
reason  to  believe  that  bodily  displacements  of  continents 
through  the  lithosphere  are  possible"  (238:304;  239:346). 
The  lithosphere,  of  course,  is  the  crust.  The  geophysicist 
F.  A.  Vening  Meinesz,  according  to  Umbgrove,  conclusively 
proved  the  considerable  strength  of  the  crust  under  the 
Pacific  (430:70). 

One  of  the  arguments  most  frequently  heard  in  favor  of 
the  Wegener  theory  is  based  on  the  apparent  correspondence 
in  shape  between  certain  continents.  It  would  seem,  for  ex- 
ample, that  South  America  might  be  fitted  together  with 
Africa,  and  so  on.  It  is  claimed  that  this  is  evidence  that  the 
two  were  once  parts  of  one  land  mass,  which  must  have 
broken  in  two.  It  is  even  claimed  that  rock  formations  on 
opposite  sides  of  the  Atlantic  match.  However,  some  years 
ago,  K.  E.  Caster  and  J.  C.  Mendes,  two  geologists  who  de- 
sired to  prove  this  theory,  spent  a  vast  amount  of  time  in 
South  America,  and  travelled  about  25,000  miles  carrying  on 
field  investigations  in  order  to  compare  in  detail  the  rock 
formations  of  South  America  with  those  of  Africa.  Their 
conclusion  was  that  the  rock  formations  did  not  prove  the 
theory.  Neither,  however,  did  the  evidence  they  had  found 
disprove  it.  They  added,  "Only  time  and  more  facts  can 
settle  the  issue"  (69:1173).  Professor  Walter  Bucher,  former 
President  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  also  answered 
this  particular  point.  He  published  a  map  showing  the 
United  States  as  it  would  look  if  flooded  up  to  1,000  feet 
above  the  present  sea  level.  The  map  shows  that  the  eastern 
and  western  sides  of  the  resulting  inland  sea  correspond 
(57:459)-  Thus,  if  the  sea  were  there  now,  it  would  look  as 
if  the  two  parts  of  North  America  had  drifted  apart.  An  alter- 
native explanation  of  such  parallel  or  corresponding  features 
will  be  suggested  in  a  later  chapter. 

Another  objection  to  the  Wegener  theory  is  that  it  assumes 
that  the  sea  bottoms  are  smooth  plains.  This  assumption  is 
necessary  for  the  theory,  for  otherwise  the  continents  could 
not  drift  over  the  ocean  basins.  As  the  result  of  the  oceano- 


PAST    THEORIES     OF     FOLAR    SHIFT  2Q 

graphic  work  of  recent  years,  it  has  been  discovered,  in  con- 
tradiction to  this,  that  there  are  mountain  ranges  on  the 
bottoms  of  all  the  oceans,  and  that  some  of  these  ranges  are 
comparable  in  size  to  the  greatest  mountain  ranges  on  land. 
Furthermore,  several  hundred  volcanic  mountains  have  been 
discovered  spread  singly  over  the  ocean  floors,  many  of  them 
apparently  of  great  age. 

The  Wegener  theory  involved  the  corollary  that,  as  the 
continents  had  drifted  very  slowly  across  the  smooth  ocean 
floors,  these  floors  had  accumulated  sediment  to  great  thick- 
nesses. It  was  thought  that  this  sediment  should  provide  an 
unbroken  record  for  the  whole  period  of  geological  time 
since  the  formation  of  the  oceans.  The  greatest  surprise  of 
recent  oceanographic  exploration,  however,  has  been  the 
discovery  that  this  supposed  layer  of  sediment  is  nonexistent. 
The  layer  of  sediment  on  the  ocean  bottom  is  uneven,  in 
some  places  only  a  few  feet  or  a  few  inches  thick,  and  is  rarely 
of  great  thickness.  The  matter  of  submarine  sediments  will  be 
discussed  more  fully  in  later  chapters. 

Another  startling  contradiction  to  the  Wegener  theory  is 
presented  by  recent  data  that  have  drastically  changed  our 
former  ideas  regarding  the  date  of  the  last  ice  age  in  North 
America.  We  have  learned,  through  the  new  technique  of 
radiocarbon  dating,  that  this  ice  age  ended  only  10,000  years 
ago.  In  Wegener's  time  it  was  considered  by  geologists  that 
the  ice  age  came  to  an  end  at  least  30,000  years  ago.  Since 
Wegener  supposed  that  Europe  and  North  America  had  been 
situated  close  together  and  not  far  from  the  pole  during  the 
ice  age,  the  new  data  have  the  effect  of  requiring  an  incredi- 
ble rate  of  continental  drift.  Three  thousand  miles  of  drift 
in  10,000  years  would  amount  to  about  1,500  feet  a  year. 
Furthermore,  movement  at  something  like  this  rate  must 
still  be  going  on,  for  the  momentum  of  a  continent  in  motion 
would  be  tremendous.  And  what  would  be  the  consequence 
of  a  continuing  movement  at  this  rate?  It  would  mean  that 
oceanic  charts  would  have  to  be  revised  every  few  years,  and 
that  shipping  companies  would  have  frequently  to  augment 


jo  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

their  fares,  because  of  the  ever-increasing  distance  between 
America  and  Europe. 

To  cap  the  case,  Gutenberg  has  shown  that  the  various 
forces  that  Wegener  depended  upon  to  move  the  continents 
are  either  nonexistent  or  insufficient  (194:209),  while  another 
geophysicist,  Lambert,  has  stated  that  they  amount  to  only 
one  millionth  of  what  would  be  required  (64:162). 

It  is  interesting  to  note  that  despite  the  quite  overwhelm- 
ing character  of  these  objections,  attempts  are  still  made  to 
rehabilitate  or  rescue  the  Wegener  theory.  Daly  attempted, 
some  years  ago,  to  find  a  better  source  of  energy  for  moving 
the  continents  (98);  Hansen  cleverly  suggested  that  the  centrif- 
ugal effects  of  icecaps  might  have  moved  the  continents 
(199).  A  contemporary  Soviet  plant  geographer,  while  recog- 
nizing the  objections,  nevertheless  remarked  of  the  Wegener 
theory  that  "it,  nevertheless,  constitutes  the  only  plausible 
working  hypothesis  upon  which  the  historical  plant  geogra- 
pher may  base  his  conclusions"  (463).  As  recently  as  1950 
the  British  Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science  di- 
vided about  equally,  by  vote,  for  and  against  the  Wegener 
theory  (351). 

This  continuing  interest  in  a  theory  that  contains  so  many 
and  such  serious  difficulties  is  eloquent  confirmation  of  the 
insistent  pressure  of  the  evidence  in  favor  of  polar  shifts.  It 
seems  clear  that  the  only  reason  for  the  continuing  reluctance 
to  accept  polar  shifts  is  the  absence  of  an  acceptable  mecha- 
nism to  account  for  them.  The  Wegener  theory,  despite  its 
appeal,  was  never  generally  accepted  by  scientists,  who  have 
remained,  as  a  body,  until  very  recently,  opposed  to  any  sug- 
gestion of  polar  shifts. 

We  must  briefly  consider  the  results  of  this  impasse.  The 
failure,  over  a  long  period  of  time,  of  successive  proposals  to 
account  for  polar  change  made  it  impossible  for  scientists  to 
accept  the  field  evidence,  and  to  evaluate  it  on  its  merits. 
With  no  acceptable  theory  to  account  for  changes  in  the  posi- 
tions of  the  poles,  it  was  natural  that  such  changes  should 
be  looked  upon  as  impossible.  With  each  successive  failure 


PAST    THEORIES    OF     BOLAR    SHIFT  gl 

of  a  proposed  theory,  the  reigning  doctrine  of  the  fixity  of 
the  poles  was  reinforced.  As  time  passed  this  doctrine  became 
deeply  ingrained,  so  that  all  one  needed  to  do  to  be  labelled 
a  crank  was  to  suggest  the  possibility  of  polar  changes. 

There  have  been  two  principal  consequences  of  this  en- 
thronement of  doctrine.  In  the  first  place,  the  evidence 
amassed  by  those  who  had  been  led  to  attack  it  was  quietly 
put  aside.  A  part  of  the  evidence  was  ingeniously  explained 
away;  most  of  it  was  simply  ignored.  The  volumes  contain- 
ing it  slept  on  the  back  shelves,  or  even  in  the  storage  rooms, 
of  the  libraries,  gathering  dust.  For  several  years  now  I  have 
been  busy  taking  out  and  dusting  off  these  old  books,  drag- 
ging the  skeletons  from  the  closets,  and  finding  much  au- 
thentic and  incontrovertible  evidence  that  changes  of  the 
geographical  locations  of  the  poles  have  occurred  at  com- 
paratively short  intervals  during  at  least  the  greater  part  of 
the  history  of  the  earth. 

The  other  consequence  of  the  reigning  dogma  was  the  in- 
vention of  theories  to  explain  those  facts  that  did  not  fit  and 
could  not  be  ignored.  One  such  theory,  already  alluded  to, 
was  that  climates  were  once  virtually  uniform  from  pole  to 
pole;  that  there  were  mild,  moist  conditions  enabling  water 
lilies  and  magnolias  to  bloom  in  the  long  night  under  the 
Pole  Star.  No  way  of  accounting  for  this  was  ever  supported 
by  a  halfway  reasonable  display  of  evidence.  Nevertheless, 
such  was  the  magic  of  the  dogma  of  the  fixity  of  the  poles 
that  it  was  accepted,  and  is  still  accepted,  by  a  considerable 
section  of  the  scientific  world.  The  sum  total  of  the  contra- 
dictions in  this  theory,  and  in  the  various  theories  advanced 
to  explain  ice  ages,  mountain  formation,  the  history  of  conti- 
nents and  ocean  basins,  or  evolutionary  theory-  will  appear, 
as  we  proceed,  to  be  essentially  the  result  of  the  impasse  be- 
tween the  evidence  and  the  doctrine  of  the  fixity  of  the  poles. 
The  necessity  of  reconciling  the  constantly  accumulating 
facts  in  a  number  of  fields  with  a  basic  error  has  produced  a 
multiplicity  of  theories  which  are,  in  fact,  a  veritable  cloud 
castle  of  conjectures,  without  substance. 


32  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

5.  New  Proposals  of  Polar  Shift 

Since  truth  cannot  be  suppressed  forever,  it  was  inevitable 
that  accumulating  facts  should  eventually  bring  the  polar 
issue  again  into  the  foreground.  Gutenberg  suggested  that 
while  continents  cannot  drift,  perhaps  they  can  creep  (194: 
211).  The  British  astronomer  Gold  postulated  that  the  earth's 
wobble  on  its  axis  could  cause  a  plastic  readjustment  of  its 
mantle  sufficient  to  move  the  poles  90  degrees  in  a  million 
years  (176).  The  French  geographer  Jacques  Blanchard  sug- 
gested the  possibility  of  extensive  polar  changes  due  to  more 
pronounced  wobbling  of  the  earth  in  the  past  (38).  Ting  Ying 
H.  Ma,  of  Formosa,  raised  the  idea  of  a  combination  of  conti- 
nental drift  with  displacement  of  the  outer  shells  of  the 
earth  (285-290).  Bain  thought  of  displacements  of  the  crust 
to  account  for  facts  of  ancient  plant  geography  and  fossil  soils 
and  suggested  a  mechanism  to  try  to  account  for  them  (18). 
Pauly  (342)  revived  the  suggestion  made  by  Eddington  (124) 
that  the  earth's  crust  may  have  been  displaced  by  the  effects  of 
tidal  friction.  Kelly  and  Dachille,  in  a  provocative  work  on 
collision  geology  entitled  Target  Earth,  offered  the  hypothesis 
of  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  as  the  result  of  collisions 
with  planetoids  (248). 

The  most  important  recent  contribution  to  the  controversy 
has  certainly  been  the  evidence  produced  by  geophysicists  in- 
vestigating terrestrial  magnetism.  This  new  evidence  is  so  im- 
pressive that  it  has  brought  about  a  reversal  of  opinion  in  high 
geological  quarters  on  the  question  of  the  permanence  of  the 
poles.  One  of  the  leading  specialists  in  this  field,  Dr.  J.  W. 
Graham,  has  recently  remarked: 

.  .  .  Within  the  past  couple  of  years  there  have  appeared  a  num- 
ber of  serious  papers  dealing  with  the  subject  of  polar  wanderings  by 
which  is  meant  a  shift  of  the  geographic  features  of  the  earth's  surface 
with  respect  to  the  axis  of  spin.  Classical  geophysical  treatments  of 
the  type  pioneered  by  Sir  George  H.  Darwin  early  in  this  century 
have  been  re-examined  in  the  light  of  our  more  recent  knowledge  of 


PAST    THEORIES    OF     POLAR    SHIFT  gj 

the  earth  and  its  properties,  and  the  conclusion  is  reached  that, 
whereas  polar  wandering  was  formerly  considered  impossible,  it  now 
seems  to  some,  at  least,  inevitable.  These  re-examinations  were  in- 
spired by  deductions  based  on  the  rock  magnetism  studies  of  the  past 
few  years  (428:86). 

In  1954  the  results  of  one  of  these  studies  were  made  pub- 
lic by  the  British  scientists  Clegg,  Almond,  and  Stubbs.  They 
found  impressive  evidence  of  changed  directions  of  the  earth's 
magnetic  field  in  past  periods  and  concluded: 

Finally,  it  seems  therefore  that  the  most  likely  explanation  of  the 
observed  horizontal  direction  of  magnetization  of  the  sediments 
studied  is  that  the  whole  land  mass  which  now  constitutes  England 
has  rotated  clockwise  through  34°  relative  to  the  earth's  geographical 
axis.  .  .  . 

If  such  a  rotation  of  England  occurred,  it  could  have  been  a  local 
movement  of  a  part  only  of  the  earth's  crust,  or  alternately,  the  earth's 
mantle  could  have  moved  as  a  rigid  whole  relative  to  the  geographical 
poles.  The  first  hypothesis  would  consider  the  rotation  either  as  a 
purely  local  movement  or  as  part  of  a  drift  of  large  continental  land 
masses.  The  second  would  adduce  pole  wandering  as  the  operative 
mechanism.  .  .  .  (81:596). 

Many  speculations  regarding  polar  changes  are  being  put 
forward  at  the  present  time  without  suggesting  any  mecha- 
nism. Thus,  in  recent  months  Soviet  scientists  writing  for  the 
newspaper  Red  Star  had  the  North  Pole  situated  at  55°  N. 
Lat.  60,000,000  years  ago,  and  in  the  Pacific  to  the  southwest 
of  Southern  California  300,000,000  years  ago,  while  in  this 
country  Munk  and  Revelle  suggested  that  the  South  Pole 
was  once  over  Africa  (315). 

Needless  to  say,  none  of  these  concepts  has  been  brought 
forward  without  evidence.  The  evidence  is  converging  from 
many  directions,  with  an  effect  of  the  confluence  of  many 
rivers  into  one  mighty  torrent.  The  summary  of  the  evidence 
is  the  business  of  the  following  chapters. 


II  :  THE  ICE  AGES 


The  evidence  for  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  is,  as  I 
have  said,  scattered  over  many  parts  of  the  earth,  and  comes 
from  several  fields  of  science.  No  other  field,  however,  fur- 
nishes so  dramatic  a  confirmation  of  it  as  glacial  geology. 
Much  new  evidence  has  recently  become  available  to  supple- 
ment the  older  data  relating  to  ice  ages. 


/.  The  Failure  of  the  Older  Theories 

A  little  more  than  a  hundred  years  ago  people  were  aston- 
ished at  the  suggestion  that  great  ice  sheets,  as  much  as  a 
mile  thick,  had  once  lain  over  the  temperate  lands  of  North 
America  and  Europe.  Many  ridiculed  the  idea,  as  happens 
with  new  ideas  in  every  age,  and  sought  to  discredit  the  evi- 
dence produced  in  favor  of  it.  Eventually  the  facts  were  estab- 
lished regarding  an  ice  age  in  Europe  and  in  North  America. 
People  later  accepted  the  idea  of  not  one  but  a  series  of  ice 
ages.  As  time  went  on  evidences  were  found  of  ice  ages  on 
all  the  continents,  even  in  the  tropics.  It  was  found  that  ice 
sheets  had  once  covered  vast  areas  of  tropical  India  and  equa- 
torial Africa. 

From  the  beginning,  geologists  devoted  much  attention  to 
the  possible  cause  of  such  great  changes  in  the  climate.  One 
theory  after  another  was  proposed,  but,  as  the  information 
available  gradually  increased,  each  theory  in  turn  was  found 
to  be  in  conflict  with  the  facts,  and  as  a  consequence  had  to 
be  discarded.  In  1929,  Coleman,  one  of  the  leading  author- 
ities on  the  ice  ages,  wrote: 

Scores  of  methods  of  accounting  for  ice  ages  have  been  proposed, 
and  probably  no  other  geological  problem  has  been  so  seriously  dis- 
cussed, not  only  by  glaciologists,  but  by  meteorologists  and  biologists; 


THEICEAGES  35 

yet  no  theory  is  generally  accepted.  The  opinions  of  those  who  have 
written  on  the  subject  are  hopelessly  in  contradiction  with  one 
another,  and  good  authorities  are  arrayed  on  opposite .  sides.  .  .  . 
(87:246). 

Recent  writers,  such  as  Daly  (98:257),  Umbgrove  (429:285), 
and  Gutenberg  (194:205),  agree  that  the  situation  described 
by  Coleman  is  essentially  unchanged.  In  January,  1953,  Pro- 
fessor J.  K.  Charlesworth,  of  Queen's  University,  Belfast, 
expressed  the  opinion  that 

The  cause  of  all  these  changes,  one  of  the  greatest  riddles  in  geolog- 
ical history,  remains  unsolved;  despite  the  endeavors  of  generations  of 
astronomers,  biologists,  geologists,  meteorologists  and  physicists,  it 
still  eludes  us  (75:3). 

A  volume  on  climatic  change,  edited  by  Dr.  Harlow 
Shapley  (375),  while  introducing  minor  refinements  in  var- 
ious theories,  in  no  way  modifies  the  general  effect,  which  is 
that  down  to  the  present  time  the  theorizing  about  the  causes 
of  ice  ages  has  led  nowhere. 


2.  The  Misplaced  Icecaps 

One  problem  that  writers  on  the  ice  ages  have  attempted  to 
solve,  sometimes  in  rather  fantastic  ways,  but  without  suc- 
cess, is  that  of  the  wrong  location  of  the  great  icecaps  of  the 
past.  These  icecaps  have  refused  to  have  anything  to  do  with 
the  polar  areas  of  the  present  day,  except  in  a  quite  inci- 
dental fashion. 

Originally  it  was  thought  that  in  glacial  periods  the  ice- 
caps would  fan  out  from  the  poles,  but  then  it  appeared  that 
none  of  them  did  so,  except  the  ones  that  have  existed  in 
Antarctica.  Coleman  drew  attention  to  the  essential  facts,  as 
follows: 

In  early  times  it  was  supposed  that  during  the  glacial  period  a  vast 
ice  cap  radiated  from  the  North  Pole,  extending  varying  distances 
southward  over  seas  and  continents.  It  was  presently  found,  however, 
that  some  northern  countries  were  never  covered  by  ice,  and  that  in 


j6  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

reality  there  were  several  more  or  less  distinct  ice  sheets  starting  from 
local  centers,  and  expanding  in  all  directions,  north  as  well  as  east 
and  west  and  south.  It  was  found,  too,  that  these  ice  sheets  were  dis- 
tributed in  what  seemed  a  capricious  manner.  Siberia,  now  including 
some  of  the  coldest  parts  of  the  world,  was  not  covered,  and  the  same 
was  true  of  most  of  Alaska,  and  the  Yukon  Territory  in  Canada; 
while  northern  Europe,  with  its  relatively  mild  climate,  was  buried 
under  ice  as  far  south  as  London  and  Berlin;  and  most  of  Canada 
and  the  United  States  were  covered,  the  ice  reaching  as  far  south  as 
Cincinnati  in  the  Mississippi  Valley  (87:7-9). 

With  regard  to  an  earlier  age  (the  Permo-Carboniferous), 
Coleman  emphasized  that  the  locations  of  the  icecaps  were 
even  further  out  of  line: 

Unless  the  continents  have  shifted  their  positions  since  that  time, 
the  Permo-Carboniferous  glaciation  occurred  chiefly  in  what  is  now 
the  southern  temperate  zone,  and  did  not  reach  the  arctic  regions  at 
all  (87:90). 

He  is  much  upset  by  the  fact  that  this  ice  age  apparently  did 
not  affect  Europe: 

Unless  European  geologists  have  overlooked  evidence  of  glaciation 
at  the  end  of  the  Carboniferous  or  at  the  beginning  of  the  Permian, 
the  continent  escaped  the  worst  of  the  glaciation  that  had  such  over- 
whelming effects  on  other  parts  of  the  world.  A  reason  for  this  exemp- 
tion is  not  easily  found  (87:96). 

One  of  the  most  extraordinary  cases  is  that  of  the  great  ice 
sheet  that  covered  most  of  India  in  this  period.  Geologists  are 
able  to  tell  from  a  careful  study  of  the  glacial  evidences  in 
what  direction  an  ice  sheet  moved,  and  in  this  case  the  ice 
sheet  moved  northward  from  an  ice  center  in  southern  India 
for  a  distance  of  1,100  miles.  Coleman  comments  on  this  as 
follows: 

Now,  an  ice  sheet  on  level  ground,  as  it  seems  to  have  been  in 
India,  must  necessarily  extend  in  all  directions,  since  it  is  not  the 
slope  of  the  surface  it  rests  on  that  sets  it  in  motion,  but  the  thickness 
of  the  ice  towards  the  central  parts.  .  .  . 

The  Indian  ice  sheet  should  push  southward  as  well  as  northward. 
Did  it  really  push  as  far  to  the  south  of  Lat.  17°  as  to  the  north?  It 


THEICEAGES  37 

extended  1100  miles  to  the  Salt  Range  in  the  north.  If  it  extended  the 
same  distance  to  the  south  it  would  reach  the  equator  (87:110-11). 

The  great  South  African  geologist  A.  L.  du  Toit  pointed 
out  that  the  icecaps  of  all  geological  periods  in  the  Southern 
Hemisphere  were  eccentric  as  regards  the  South  Pole,  just 
as  the  Pleistocene  icecaps  were  eccentric  with  regard  to  the 
North  Pole  (87:262).  Isn't  it  extraordinary  that  the  Antarctic 
icecap,  which  we  can  actually  see  because  it  now  exists,  is  the 
only  one  of  all  these  icecaps  that  is  found  in  the  polar  zone, 
where  it  ought  to  be? 

Dr.  George  W.  Bain,  a  contemporary  writer  to  whom  I 
shall  refer  again,  has  pointed  out  a  very  interesting  feature 
of  the  great  icecap  that  existed  in  the  Permo-Carboniferous 
Period  right  in  the  center  of  tropical  Africa— in  the  Congo. 
He  has  observed  that  the  icecap,  apparently,  was  asymmetric 
in  shape:  it  spread  from  its  center  of  origin  much  farther  in 
one  direction  than  in  another  (18:46).  This  is  reconcilable 
with  our  theory,  which  depends  upon  the  asymmetry  of  ice- 
caps. It  seems  that  this  African  ice  sheet  reached  the  present 
equator. 

Coleman,  who  did  a  great  deal  of  field  work  in  Africa  and 
India,  studying  the  evidences  of  the  ice  ages  there,  writes  in- 
terestingly of  his  experiences  in  finding  the  signs  of  intense 
cold  in  areas  where  he  had  to  toil  in  the  blazing  heat  of  the 
tropical  sun: 

On  a  hot  evening  in  early  winter  two  and  a  half  degrees  within  the 
torrid  zone  amid  tropical  surroundings  it  was  very  hard  to  imagine 
the  region  as  covered  for  thousands  of  years  with  thousands  of  feet 
of  ice.  The  contrast  of  the  present  with  the  past  was  astounding,  and 
it  was  easy  to  see  why  some  of  the  early  geologists  fought  so  long 
against  the  idea  of  glaciation  in  India  at  the  end  of  the  Carboniferous 

(87:108). 

Some  hours  of  scrambling  and  hammering  under  the  intense 
African  sun,  in  lat.  27°  5',  without  a  drop  of  water,  while  collecting 
striated  stones  and  a  slab  of  polished  floor  of  slate,  provided  a  most 
impressive  contrast  between  the  present  and  the  past,  for  though 
August  27th  is  still  early  Spring,  the  heat  is  fully  equal  to  that  of  a 


38  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

sunny  August  day  in  North  America.  The  dry,  wilting  glare  and 
perspiration  made  the  thought  of  an  ice  sheet  thousands  of  feet  thick 
at  that  very  spot  most  incredible,  but  most  alluring  (87:124). 

When  these  facts  were  established,  geologists  sought  to  ex- 
plain them  by  assuming  that,  at  periods  when  these  areas 
were  glaciated,  they  were  elevated  much  higher  above  sea 
level  than  they  are  now.  Theoretically,  even  an  area  near 
the  equator,  if  elevated  several  miles  above  sea  level,  would 
be  cold  enough  for  an  ice  sheet.  What  made  the  theory  plausi- 
ble was  the  well-known  fact  that  the  elevations  of  all  the 
lands  of  the  globe  have  changed  repeatedly  and  drastically 
during  the  course  of  geological  history.  Unfortunately  for 
those  who  tried  to  explain  the  misplaced  icecaps  in  this  way, 
however,  Coleman  showed  that  they  reached  sea  level,  within 
the  tropics,  on  three  continents:  Asia,  Africa,  and  Australia 
(87:129,  134,  140,  168,  183).  At  the  same  time,  W.  J.  Hum- 
phreys, in  his  examination  of  the  meteorological  factors  of 
glaciation,  made  the  point  that  high  elevation  means  less 
moisture  in  the  air,  as  well  as  lowered  temperature,  and  is 
therefore  unfavorable  for  the  accumulation  of  great  icecaps 
(232:612-13). 


5.  World-wide  Phases  of  Cold  Weather 

A  widely  accepted  assumption  with  which  contemporary 
geologists  approach  the  question  of  ice  ages  is  that  the  latter 
occurred  as  the  result  of  a  lowering  of  the  average  tempera- 
ture of  the  whole  surface  of  the  earth  at  the  same  time.  This 
assumption  has  forced  them  to  look  for  a  cause  of  glacial 
periods  only  in  such  possible  factors  as  could  operate  to  cool 
the  whole  surface  of  the  earth  at  once.  It  has  also  compelled 
them  to  maintain  the  view  that  glacial  periods  have  always 
been  simultaneous  in  the  Northern  and  Southern  Hemi- 
spheres. 

It  is  remarkable  that  this  assumption  has  been  maintained 
over  a  long  period  of  time  despite  the  fact  that  it  is  in  sharp 


THEICEAGES  39 

conflict  with  basic  principles  of  physics  in  the  field  of  meteor- 
ology. The  basic  conflict  was  brought  to  the  attention  of 
science  at  least  seventy  years  ago;  it  has  never  been  resolved. 
It  consists  essentially  of  the  fact  that  glacial  periods  were 
periods  of  heavier  rainfall  in  areas  outside  the  regions  of  the 
ice  sheets,  so  that  this,  together  with  the  deep  accumulations 
of  ice  in  the  great  ice  sheets,  must  have  involved  a  higher 
average  rate  of  precipitation  during  ice  ages.  There  is  a  great 
deal  of  geological  evidence  in  support  of  this.  Only  recently, 
for  example,  Davies  has  discussed  the  so-called  "pluvial" 
periods  in  Africa,  and  has  correlated  them  with  the  Pleisto- 
cene glacial  periods  (107). 

Now,  meteorologists  point  out  that  if  precipitation  is  to  be 
increased,  there  has  to  be  a  greater  supply  of  moisture  in  the 
air.  The  only  possible  way  of  increasing  the  amount  of 
moisture  in  the  air  is  to  raise  the  temperature  of  the  air. 
It  would  seem,  therefore,  that  to  get  an  ice  age  one  would 
have  to  raise,  rather  than  lower,  the  average  temperature. 
This  essential  fact  of  physics  was  pointed  out  as  long  ago  as 
1892  by  Sir  Robert  Ball,  who  quoted  an  earlier  remark  by 
Tyndall: 

.  .  .  Professor  Tyndall  has  remarked  that  the  heat  that  would  be 
required  to  evaporate  enough  water  to  form  a  glacier  would  be  suffi- 
cient to  fuse  and  transform  into  glowing  molten  liquid  a  stream  of 
cast  iron  five  times  as  heavy  as  the  glacier  itself  (20:108). 

William  Lee  Stokes  has  again  called  attention  to  this  un- 
solved problem  in  his  recent  article  entitled  "Another  Look 
at  the  Ice  Age": 

Lowering  temperatures  and  increased  precipitation  are  considered 
to  have  existed  side  by  side  on  a  world-wide  scale  and  over  a  long 
period  in  apparent  defiance  of  sound  climatological  theory.  Among 
the  many  quotations  that  could  be  cited  reflecting  the  need  for  a 
more  comprehensive  explanation  of  this  difficulty  the  following  seems 
typical. 

"In  the  Arequipa  region  [of  Peru],  as  in  many  others  in  both  hemi- 
spheres where  Pleistocene  conditions  have  been  studied,  this  period 
appears  to  have  been  characterized  by  increased  precipitation  as  well 


40  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

as  lowered  temperatures.  If,  however,  precipitation  was  then  greater 
over  certain  areas  of  the  earth's  surface  than  it  is  at  present,  a  corol- 
lary seems  to  be  implied  that  over  other  large  areas  evaporation  was 
greater  than  normal  to  supply  increased  precipitation,  and  hence  in 
these  latter  areas  the  climate  was  warmer  than  normal.  This  seems  at 
first  to  be  an  astonishing  conclusion.  .  .  .  We  might  propose  the 
hypothesis  that  climatic  conditions  were  far  from  steady  in  any  one 
area,  but  were  subject  to  large  shifts,  and  that  intervals  of  ameliorated 
conditions  in  some  regions  coincided  with  increased  severity  in  others. 
The  Pleistocene,  then,  may  have  been  a  period  of  sharper  contrasts 
of  climate  and  of  shifting  climates  rather  than  a  period  of  greater 
cold"  (405:815-16). 

From  a  number  of  points  of  view,  the  foregoing  passage  is 
extremely  remarkable.  Stokes  recognizes  the  fact  that  the 
basic  assumption  of  contemporary  geologists  regarding  the 
glacial  periods  is  in  conflict  with  the  laws  of  physics.  Then,  in 
the  passage  he  quotes,  he  draws  attention  to  the  implications, 
which  seem  to  point  directly  to  crust  displacement,  for  in 
what  other  way  can  we  explain  how  one  part  of  the  earth's 
surface  was  colder  and  another,  at  the  same  time,  warmer 
than  at  present? 

One  of  the  arguments  that  is  advanced  in  support  of  the 
assumption  of  world-wide  periods  of  colder  weather  (which 
remains  the  generally  accepted  assumption  of  glaciologists) 
has  its  basis  in  geological  evidence  purporting  to  prove  that 
ice  ages  occurred  simultaneously  in  both  hemispheres.  A 
decade  ago,  however,  Kroeber  pointed  to  the  essential  weak- 
ness of  this  geological  evidence,  when  he  showed  the  difficulty 
of  correlating  stratified  deposits  of  different  areas  with  each 
other: 

.  .  .  There  is  plenty  of  geologic  evidence,  in  many  parts  of  the 
earth,  of  changes  of  climates,  especially  between  wet  and  dry  areas; 
and  some  of  these  happened  in  the  Pleistocene.  But  the  correlation  of 
such  changes  as  they  occurred  in  widely  separated  regions,  and  espe- 
cially as  between  permanently  ice-free  and  glaciated  areas,  is  an  intri- 
cate, tricky,  and  highly  technical  matter,  on  which  the  anthropological 
student  must  take  the  word  of  geologists  and  climatologists,  and  these 
are  by  no  means  in  agreement.  They  may  be  reasonably  sure  of  one 
series  of  climatic  successions  in  one  region,  and  of  another  in  a  second 


THE     ICE     AGES  41 

or  third  region;  but  there  may  be  little  direct  evidence  on  the  corre- 
spondence of  the  several  series  of  regional  stages,  the  identification  of 
which  then  remains  speculative  (257:650). 

At  the  time  that  Kroeber  remarked  on  the  difficulty  of 
correlating  climatic  changes  in  different  parts  of  the  world, 
we  were  not  yet  in  possession  of  the  data  recently  provided  by 
the  new  techniques  of  radiocarbon  and  ionium  dating,  which 
will  be  discussed  below.  The  effect  of  the  new  data  has  been 
to  shorten  very  greatly  our  estimate  of  the  duration  of  the 
last  North  American  ice  age.  This  estimate  has  been  reduced, 
in  the  last  few  years,  from  about  150,000  years  to  about 
25,000  years,  or  by  five  sixths.  Now,  if  we  adopt  the  view  that 
ancient  glaciations,  of  which  we  know  little,  may  reasonably 
be  considered  to  have  been  the  results  of  the  same  causes 
that  brought  about  the  North  American  ice  age,  then  we 
must  grant  that  they,  too,  were  of  short  duration.  But  if  this 
is  true,  how  is  it  possible  to  establish  the  fact  that  they  were 
contemporary  in  the  two  hemispheres?  A  geological  period 
has  a  duration  of  millions  of  years.  An  ice  age  in  Europe  and 
one  in  Australia  might  both  be,  for  example,  of  Eocene  age, 
but  the  Eocene  Epoch  is  estimated  to  have  lasted  about  15,- 
000,000  years.  We  can  discriminate  roughly  between  strata 
dating  from  the  early,  middle,  or  late  Eocene,  but  we  have  no 
way  of  pinpointing  the  date  of  any  event  in  the  Eocene.  Even 
with  the  new  techniques  of  radiodating  now  being  applied 
to  the  older  rocks,  it  is  possible  to  determine  dates  only  to 
within  a  margin  of  error  of  about  a  million  years.  How,  then, 
is  it  possible  to  determine  that  an  ice  sheet  in  one  hemisphere 
was  really  contemporary  with  an  ice  sheet  or  an  ice  age  in 
the  other? 

The  attempt  to  maintain  the  assumption  of  the  simultane- 
ousness  of  glaciations  for  the  older  geological  periods  is  mani- 
festly absurd.  I  shall  show  in  what  follows  that  it  is  equally 
absurd  for  the  recent  geological  time.  It  is  my  impression 
that  the  material  evidence  for  the  assumption  was  never  im- 
pressive, and  that  the  assumption  was  never  derived  em- 
pirically from  the  evidence  but  was  borrowed  a  priori  from 


4*  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

the  parent  assumption,  that  is,  the  assumption  of  the  lower- 
ing of  global  temperatures  during  ice  ages,  which  assumption 
is,  as  already  pointed  out,  in  conflict  with  the  laws  of  physics. 
If  it  is  true  that  the  fundamental  assumption  underlying 
most  of  the  theories  produced  to  explain  ice  ages  is  in  error, 
we  should  expect  that  these  theories,  despite  their  many 
differences,  would  have  a  common  quality  of  futility,  and  so 
it  turns  out.  It  is  interesting  to  list  the  kinds  of  hypothetical 
causes  that  have  been  suggested  to  explain  ice  ages  on  the 
assumption  of  a  world-wide  lowering  of  temperature.  They 
are  as  follows: 

a.  Variations  in  the  quantity  of  particle  emission  and  of 
the  radiant  heat  given  off  by  the  sun. 

b.  Interception  of  part  of  the  sun's  radiation  by  clouds 
of  interstellar  gas  or  dust. 

c.  Variations  in  the  heat  of  space;  that  is,  the  temperature 
of  particles  floating  in  space  which,  entering  the  earth's 
atmosphere,  might  affect  its  temperature. 

d.  Variations  in  the  quantities  of  dust  particles  in  the  at- 
mosphere, from  volcanic  eruptions  or  other  causes,  or 
variations  in  proportion  of  carbon  dioxide  in  the  at- 
mosphere. 

The  objections  to  these  suggestions  are  all  very  cogent.  So 
far  as  the  variation  of  the  sun's  radiation  is  concerned,  it  is 
known  that  it  varies  slightly  over  short  periods,  but  there  is 
no  evidence  that  it  has  ever  varied  enough,  or  for  a  long 
enough  time,  to  cause  an  ice  age.  Evidence  for  the  second  and 
third  suggestions  is  entirely  lacking.  The  fourth  suggestion  is 
deprived  of  value  because,  on  the  one  hand,  no  causes  can 
be  suggested  for  long-term  changes  in  the  number  of  erup- 
tions or  in  the  atmospheric  proportion  of  carbon  dioxide, 
and,  on  the  other,  there  is  insufficient  evidence  to  show  that 
the  changes  ever  occurred. 

I  should  make  one  reservation  with  regard  to  the  fourth 
suggestion.  There  is  one  event  that  would  provide  an  ade- 
quate cause  for  an  increase  in  the  atmosphere  of  both  vol- 


THE     ICE    AGES  43 

canic  dust  and  carbon  dioxide,  and  that  is  a  displacement  of 
the  crust.  The  extremely  far-reaching  consequences  of  a  dis- 
placement of  the  crust  with  respect  to  atmospheric  condi- 
tions, and  the  importance  of  the  atmospheric  effects  of  a 
displacement  for  other  questions,  will  be  discussed  in  Chap- 
ters VII  and  VIII. 

The  theories  listed  above  were  attacked  by  Coleman,  who 
complained  that  they  were  entirely  intangible  and  unprov- 
able.  He  said: 

Such  vague  and  accidental  causes  for  climatic  change  should  be 
appealed  to  only  as  a  last  resort  unless  positive  proof  some  time  be- 
comes available  showing  that  an  event  of  the  kind  actually  took 
place  (87:282). 

Another  group  of  theories  attempts  to  explain  ice  ages  as 
the  results  of  changes  in  the  positions  of  the  earth  and  the 
sun*  These  are  of  two  kinds:  changes  in  the  distance  between 
the  earth  and  the  sun  at  particular  times  because  of  changes 
in  the  shape  of  the  earth's  orbit,  and  changes  in  the  angle  of 
inclination  of  the  earth's  axis,  which  occur  regularly  as  the 
result  of  precession.  The  argument  that  precession  was  the 
cause  of  ice  ages  was  advanced  by  Drayson  in  the  last  century 
(117).  The  argument  based  on  these  astronomical  changes 
has  been  brought  up  to  date  in  the  recent  work  of  Brouwer 
and  Van  Woerkom  (375: 147-58)  and  Emiliani  (132).  It  now 
seems  that  these  astronomical  changes  may  produce  cyclical 
changes  in  the  distribution  of  the  sun's  heat,  and  perhaps  in 
the  amount  of  the  sun's  heat  retained  by  the  earth,  but  it  is 
agreed,  by  Emiliani  and  others,  that  by  itself  the  insolation 
curve  or  net  temperature  difference  would  not  be  sufficient 
to  cause  an  ice  age  without  the  operation  of  other  factors, 
and  so  Emiliani  suggests  that  perhaps  changes  in  elevation 
coinciding  with  the  cool  phases  of  the  insolation  curve  may 
have  caused  the  Pleistocene  ice  ages.  One  weakness  of  this 
suggestion  is,  of  course,  the  necessity  to  suppose  two  inde- 
pendent causes  for  ice  ages. 

There  is  another  objection  to  be  advanced  against  all 


44  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

theories  supposing  a  general  fall  of  world  temperatures  during 
the  ice  ages.  We  have  seen  that  ice  ages  existed  in  the  tropics 
and  that  great  icecaps  covered  vast  areas  on  and  near  the 
equator.  This  happened  not  once,  but  several  times.  The 
question  is,  if  the  temperature  of  the  whole  earth  fell  enough 
to  permit  ice  sheets  a  mile  thick  to  develop  on  the  equator, 
just  where  did  the  fauna  and  flora  go  for  refuge?  How  did 
they  survive?  How  did  the  reef  corals,  which  require  a  mini- 
mum sea- water  temperature  of  68°  F.  throughout  the  year, 
manage  to  survive?  We  know  that  the  reef  corals,  for  ex- 
ample, existed  long  before  the  period  of  the  tropical  ice 
sheets.  Furthermore,  we  know  that  the  great  forests  of  the 
Carboniferous  Period,  which  gave  us  most  of  our  coal,  lived 
both  earlier  than  and  contemporarily  with  the  glaciations  of 
Africa  and  India,  though  in  different  places.  Obviously,  this 
would  have  been  impossible  if  the  temperature  of  the  whole 
earth  had  been  simultaneously  reduced,  for  the  equatorial 
zone  itself  would  have  been  uninhabitable  while  all  other 
areas  were  still  colder.  It  is  small  wonder  that  W.  B.  Wright 
insisted,  over  a  quarter  of  a  century  ago,  that  the  Permo- 
Carboniferous  ice  sheets  in  Africa  and  India  were  proof  of  a 
shift  of  the  poles  (461). 


4.  The  New  Evidence  of  Radiocarbon  Dating 

The  problem  of  the  causes  of  ice  ages  has  been  still  further 
complicated  by  a  recent  revolution  in  our  methods  of  dating 
geological  events.  In  the  course  of  the  last  ten  years  all  of 
our  ideas  regarding  the  dating  of  the  recent  ice  ages,  their 
durations,  and  the  speed  of  growth  and  disappearance  of  the 
great  ice  sheets  have  been  transformed.  This  is  altogether  the 
most  important  new  development  in  the  sciences  of  the  earth. 
The  repercussions  in  many  directions  are  most  remarkable. 
In  order  to  get  an  idea  of  the  extent  of  the  change,  let  us 
see  what  the  situation  was  only  ten  years  ago.  As  everybody  is 
aware,  geologists  are  used  to  thinking  in  terms  of  millions  of 


THEICEAGES  45 

years.  To  a  geologist  a  period  of  1,000,000  years  has  come 
to  mean  almost  nothing  at  all.  He  is  actually  used  to  thinking 
that  events  that  took  place  somewhere  within  the  same  20,- 
000,000-year  period  were  roughly  contemporaneous.  As  to 
the  ice  ages,  the  older  ones  were  simply  thrown  into  one  of 
these  long  geological  periods,  but  there  was  no  way  to  de- 
termine their  durations  (except  very  roughly),  their  speeds 
of  development,  or  precisely  when  they  happened.  It  was 
convenient  to  assume  that  they  had  endured  for  hundreds  of 
thousands  or  for  millions  of  years,  though  no  real  evidence 
of  this  existed.  A  good  instance  is  that  of  the  Antarctic  ice- 
cap, of  which  we  shall  hear  more  below. 

So  far  as  the  most  recent  division  of  geologic  time,  the 
Pleistocene,  was  concerned,  geologists,  with  much  more  evi- 
dence to  work  from,  saw  that  there  had  been  at  least  four  ice 
ages  in  a  period  of  about  1,000,000  years.  They  consequently 
proposed  the  idea  that  the  Pleistocene  was  not  at  all  like 
previous  periods.  It  was  exceptional,  because  it  had  so  many 
ice  ages.  They  may  have  been  misled  by  failure  to  take  suffi- 
cient account  of  the  fact  that  glacial  evidence  is  very  easily 
destroyed,  and  that,  as  we  go  further  back  into  geological 
history,  the  mathematical  chances  of  finding  evidences  of 
glaciation,  never  very  good,  decrease  by  geometrical  progres- 
sion. 

Down  to  ten  years  ago— and,  indeed,  until  1951 —it  was  the 
considered  judgment  of  geologists  that  the  last  ice  age  in 
North  America,  which  they  refer  to  as  the  Wisconsin  glacia- 
tion, began  about  150,000  years  ago,  and  ended  about  30,000 
years  ago. 

This  opinion  appeared  to  be  based  upon  strong  evidence. 
The  estimates  of  the  date  of  the  end  of  the  ice  age  were  sup- 
ported by  the  careful  counting  of  clay  varves  (6)  and  by 
numerous  seemingly  reliable  estimates  of  the  age  of  Niagara 
Falls.  As  a  consequence,  experts  were  contemptuous  of  all 
those  who,  for  one  reason  or  another,  attempted  to  argue  that 
the  ice  age  was  more  recent.  One  of  these  was  Drayson,  whose 
theory  called  for  a  very  recent  ice  age.  His  followers  produced 


46  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

much  evidence,  but  it  was  ignored.  When  the  Swedish  scien* 
tist  Gerard  de  Geer  established  by  clay  varve  counting  that 
the  ice  sheet  was  withdrawing  from  Sweden  as  recently  as 
13,000  years  ago,  the  implications  were  not  really  accepted, 
nor  were  his  results  popularly  known.  Books  continued  to  ap- 
pear, even  thirty  years  afterwards,  with  the  original  estimates 
of  the  age  of  the  icecap. 

Then,  following  World  War  II,  nuclear  physics  made  pos- 
sible the  development  of  new  techniques  for  dating  geolog- 
ical events.  One  of  these  was  radiocarbon  dating. 

The  method  of  radiocarbon  dating  was  developed  by 
Willard  F.  Libby,  nuclear  physicist  of  the  University  of  Chi- 
cago, now  a  member  of  the  United  States  Atomic  Energy 
Commission.  It  uses  an  isotope  of  carbon  (Carbon  14)  which 
has  a  "half-life"  of  about  5,568  years  (115:75).  A  "half-life" 
is  the  period  during  which  a  radioactive  substance  loses  half 
its  mass  by  radiation.  Among  the  very  numerous  artificial 
radioactive  elements  created  in  nuclear  explosions  some  have 
half-lives  of  millionths  of  seconds;  others,  occurring  in  na- 
ture, have  half-lives  of  millions  of  years.  For  geological  dating 
it  is  necessary  to  have  radioactive  elements  that  diminish  sig- 
nificantly during  the  periods  that  have  to  be  studied,  and 
that  occur  in  nature. 

Since  radiocarbon  exists  in  nature,  and  has  a  relatively 
short  half-life,  the  quantity  of  it  in  any  substance  containing 
organic  carbon  will  decline  perceptibly  in  periods  of  a  few 
centuries.  By  finding  out  how  much  carbon  was  contained 
originally  in  the  specimen  and  then  measuring  what  still  re- 
mains, the  date  can  be  found  to  within  a  small  margin  of 
error. 

When  this  method  was  first  developed  by  Libby,  it  could 
date  anything  containing  carbon  of  organic  origin  back  to 
about  20,000  years  ago.  Since  then  the  method  has  been  im- 
proved, through  the  efforts  of  many  scientists,  and  its  range 
has  been  nearly  doubled. 

The  first  major  result  of  the  radiocarbon  method  was  the 


THEICEAGES  47 

revelation  that  the  last  North  American  ice  sheet  had  indeed 
disappeared  at  a  very  recent  date.  Tests  made  in  1951  showed 
that  it  was  still  advancing  in  Wisconsin  as  recently  as  11,000 
years  ago  (272:105);  later  tests  indicated  that  the  maximum 
of  the  ice  advance  may  have  been  a  thousand  years  later  than 
that.  When  these  dates  are  compared  with  other  dates  show- 
ing the  establishment  of  a  climate  like  the  present  one  in 
North  America,  it  seems  that  most  of  the  retreat  and  disap- 
pearance of  the  great  continental  icecap  (with  its  4,000,000 
square  miles  of  ice)  can  have  taken  little  more  than  two  or 
three  thousand  years. 

What  is  the  significance  of  this  new  discovery,  besides 
showing  how  wrong  the  geologists  had  been  before?  The  fact 
is  that  so  sudden  a  disappearance  of  a  continental  icecap 
raises  fundamental  questions.  It  endangers  some  basic  as- 
sumptions of  geological  science.  What  has  become  of  those 
gradually  acting  forces  that  were  supposed  to  govern  glacia- 
tion  as  well  as  all  other  geological  processes?  What  factor  can 
account  for  this  astonishing  rate  of  change?  It  seems  self- 
evident  that  no  astronomical  change  and  no  subcrustal 
change  deep  in  the  earth  can  occur  at  that  rate. 

When  this  discovery  was  made,  I  expected  that  the  next 
revelation  must  be  to  the  effect  that  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet 
had  had  its  origin  at  a  much  more  recent  time  than  was  sus- 
pected, and  that  the  whole  length  of  the  glacial  period  was 
but  a  fraction  of  the  former  estimates.  I  had  a  while  to  wait, 
because  radiocarbon  dating  in  1951  was  not  able  to  answer 
the  question.  By  1954,  however,  the  technique  had  been  im- 
proved so  that  it  could  determine  dates  as  far  back  as  30,000 
years  ago.  Many  datings  of  the  earlier  phases  of  the  Wisconsin 
glaciation  were  made,  and  Horberg,  who  assembled  them, 
reached  the  conclusion  that  the  icecap,  instead  of  being  150,- 
ooo  years  old,  had  appeared  in  Ohio  only  25,000  years  ago 
(222:278-86).  This  conclusion  has  been  so  great  a  shock  to 
contemporary  geology  that  some  writers  have  sought  to  evade 
the  clear  implications,  by  questioning  the  radiocarbon  meth- 


48  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

od.  Horberg  betrays  evidence  of  the  intensity  of  the  shock 
to  accepted  beliefs  when  he  says  that  the  results  of  the  evi- 
dence are  so  appalling  from  the  standpoint  of  accepted  theory 
that  it  may  be  necessary  either  to  abandon  the  concept  of 
gradual  change  in  geology  or  to  question  the  radiocarbon 
method. 

In  this  book  I  am  not  going  to  question  the  general  re- 
liability of  the  radiocarbon  method.  I  intend  merely  to  ques- 
tion the  theories  with  which  the  new  evidence  conflicts.  Dr. 
Horberg  says  that  the  necessity  to  compress  all  the  known 
stages  of  the  Wisconsin  glaciation  into  the  incredibly  short 
period  of  barely  15,000  or  20,000  years  involves  an  accel- 
eration of  geological  processes— snowfall,  rainfall,  erosion, 
sedimentation,  and  melting— that  seems  to  challenge  the  prin- 
ciple laid  down  by  the  founder  of  modern  geology,  Sir 
Charles  Lyell,  over  a  century  ago.  Lyell's  principle,  called 
"uniformitarianism,"  was  that  geological  processes  have  al- 
ways gone  on  about  as  they  are  going  on  now. 

The  Wisconsin  icecap  went  through  a  number  of  oscilla- 
tions, warm  periods  of  ice  recession  alternating  with  cold 
periods  of  ice  readvance.  Horberg  is  at  a  loss  to  see  what 
could  cause  them  to  occur  at  the  velocity  required  by  the 
radiocarbon  dates.  Allowing  for  extra  time  for  ice  growth  be- 
fore the  evidence  of  massive  glaciation  in  Ohio  25,000  years 
ago,  Horberg  manages  to  expand  this  15,000  years  to  25,000 
for  the  duration  of  the  glacier,  but  this  does  not  solve  his 
problem.  Even  so,  the  radiocarbon  dates  seem  to  require  an 
annual  movement  of  the  ice  front  of  2,005  feet,  "two  to  nine 
times  greater  than  the  rate  indicated  by  varves  and  annual 
moraines"  (222:283). 

The  fact  that  these  new  facts  call  into  question  some  basic 
ideas  in  geology  is  recognized  by  Horberg: 

Probably  only  time  and  the  progress  of  future  studies  can  tell 
whether  we  cling  too  tenaciously  to  the  uniformitarian  principle  in 
our  unwillingness  to  accept  fully  the  rapid  glacier  fluctuations  evi- 
denced by  radiocarbon  dating  (222:285). 


THEICEAGES  49 

Recent  geological  literature  shows  that  a  rather  desperate 
effort  is  being  made  to  blur  the  significance  of  the  new  data. 
We  will  return  to  this  question  later.  Here  I  would  like  to 
suggest  some  far-reaching  implications  of  these  facts.  We  have 
seen  an  ice  sheet  appear  and  disappear  in—geologically  speak- 
ing—a twinkling  of  an  eye.  There  are  three  deductions  to  be 
made: 

a.  Any  theory  of  ice  ages  must  give  a  cause  that  can  operate 
so  fast. 

b.  If  the  last  icecap  in  North  America  appeared  and  disap- 
peared in  25,000  years,  we  cannot  assume  that  the  an- 
cient icecaps  lasted  for  longer  periods. 

c.  If  other  geological  processes  are  correlated  with  ice  ages, 
then  their  tempo  must  also  have  been  faster  than  we 
have  supposed,  and  a  cause  must  be  found  for  their 
accelerated  tempo. 

In  later  chapters  we  shall  see  that  a  displacement  of  the 
crust  must  accelerate  these  geological  processes. 


5.  The  New  Evidence  from  Antarctica 

Another  kind  of  radioelement  dating  has  provided  us  with 
new  data  as  revolutionary  in  their  implications  as  the  data 
produced  by  the  radiocarbon  method.  This  is  referred  to  as 
the  radioelement  inequilibrium  method  or  (for  short)  the 
ionium  method  of  dating.  It  was  developed  by  Dr.  W.  D. 
Urry  and  Dr.  C.  S.  Piggott,  of  the  Carnegie  Institution  of 
Washington,  before  World  War  II  (439,  440).  In  recent  years 
it  has  been  widely  applied  in  oceanographic  research  by  both 
American  and  foreign  scientists. 

The  ionium  method  is  used  with  sea  sediments.  It  is  based 
upon  three  radioactive  elements,  uranium,  ionium,  and 
radium,  which  are  found  in  sea  water  and  in  sea  sediments, 
and  that  decay  at  different  rates.  As  the  result  of  the  different 


50  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

rates  of  decay,  the  proportions  of  the  three  elements  in  a 
sample  of  sediment  change  with  time,  and  thus  it  is  possible, 
by  measuring  the  remnant  quantities  of  the  three  elements, 
to  date  the  samples.The  samples  are  obtained  by  taking  long 
cores  from  the  bottom  of  the  sea.  A  core  is  obtained  by  lower- 
ing a  coring  tube  from  a  ship.  It  pierces  the  bottom  sediments 
and  obtains  a  cross  section  of  them.  The  ionium  method  per- 
mits dating  back  as  far  as  about  300,000  years. 

Among  the  materials  first  dated  by  Urry's  method  were 
some  long  cores  that  had  been  taken  from  the  bottom  of  the 
Ross  Sea  in  Antarctica  by  Dr.  Jack  Hough  during  the  Byrd 
expedition  of  1947-48.  These  cores  showed  alternations  in 
types  of  sediment.  There  was  coarse  glacial  sediment,  as  was 
expected,  and  finer  sediment  of  semiglacial  type,  but  there 
were  also  layers  of  fine  sediment  typical  of  temperate  climates. 
It  was  the  sort  of  sediment  that  is  carried  down  by  rivers  from 
ice-free  continents.  Here  was  a  first  surprise,  then.  Temper- 
ate conditions  had  evidently  prevailed  in  Antarctica  in  the 
not  distant  past.  The  sediment  indicated  that  not  less  than 
four  times  during  the  Pleistocene  Epoch,  or  during  the  last 
million  years,  had  Antarctica  enjoyed  temperate  climates.  (See 
Figure  XI,  p.  306.) 

Then,  when  this  material  was  dated  by  Dr.  Urry,  it  became 
plain  that  the  numerous  climatic  changes  had  occurred  at 
very  short  intervals.  Moreover,  it  appeared  that  the  last  ice 
age  in  Antarctica  started  only  a  few  thousand  years  ago. 
Hough  wrote: 

The  log  of  core  N-5  shows  glacial  marine  sediment  from  the  pres- 
ent to  6,000  years  ago.  From  6,000  to  15,000  years  ago  the  sediment  is 
fine-grained  with  the  exception  of  one  granule  at  about  12,000  years 
ago.  This  suggests  an  absence  of  ice  from  the  area  during  that  period, 
except  perhaps  for  a  stray  iceberg  12,000  years  ago.  Glacial  marine 
sediment  occurs  from  15,000  to  29,500  years  ago;  then  there  is  a  zone 
of  fine-grained  sediment  from  30,000  to  40,000  years  ago,  again  sug- 
gesting an  absence  of  ice  from  the  sea.  From  40,000  to  133,500  years 
ago  there  is  glacial  marine  material,  divided  into  two  zones  of  coarse- 
and  two  zones  of  medium-grained  texture. 


THE     ICE     AGES  51 

The  period  133,000-173,000  years  ago  is  represented  by  fine-grained 
sediment,  approximately  half  of  which  is  finely  laminated.  Isolated 
pebbles  occur  at  140,000,  147,000  and  156,000  years.  This  zone  is  in- 
terpreted as  recording  a  time  during  which  the  sea  at  this  station  was 
ice  free,  except  for  a  few  stray  bergs,  when  the  three  pebbles  were 
deposited.  The  laminated  sediment  may  represent  seasonal  outwash 
from  glacial  ice  on  the  Antarctic  continent. 

Glacial  marine  sediment  is  present  from  173,000  to  350,000  years 
ago,  with  some  variation  in  the  texture.  Laminated  fine-grained  sedi- 
ment from  350,000  to  420,000  years  ago  may  again  represent  rhythmic 
deposition  of  outwash  from  Antarctica  in  an  ice  free  sea.  The  bottom 
part  of  the  core  contains  glacial  marine  sediment  dated  from  420,000 
to  460,000  years  by  extra-polation  of  the  time  scale  from  the  younger 
part  of  the  core  (225:257-59). 

It  should  be  realized  that  the  Ross  Sea,  from  which  these 
cores  were  taken,  is  a  great  triangular  wedge  driven  right  into 
the  heart  of  the  continent  of  Antarctica,  to  within  about 
eight  hundred  miles  of  the  pole.  It  follows  that,  when  the 
shores  of  the  Ross  Sea  were  free  of  ice,  and  if  free-flowing 
rivers  were  bringing  down  sediment  from  the  interior,  Ant- 
arctica must  have  been  very  largely  an  ice-free  continent. 
Some  of  the  fine  sediment,  it  is  true,  does  not  indicate  ice-free 
conditions  for  the  whole  continent,  but  only  for  the  sea  itself. 
The  laminated  sediment,  consisting  of  distinct  thin  layers 
each  representing  the  deposition  of  one  year,  suggests  the 
results  of  a  summer  melting  of  an  ice  sheet  not  far  from  the 
sea,  with  swollen  streams  of  melt  water  carrying  the  sedi- 
ment to  the  sea.  Such  conditions  do  not  suggest  any  wide 
deglaciation  of  Antarctica,  though  they  do  suggest  conditions 
very  different  from  those  prevailing  now.  On  the  other  hand, 
unlaminated  deposits  of  fine  sediment  are  consistent  with  a 
general  and  even  with  a  total  deglaciation  of  Antarctica.  So 
far  as  we  can  see,  such  sediment  can  only  have  been  brought 
down  to  the  sea  by  rivers  flowing  from  the  interior  of  the 
continent.  The  very  existence  of  such  unfrozen  rivers  re- 
quires the  deglaciation  of  a  part  of  the  continent.  One  is  free 
to  assume  that  the  deglaciation  applied  to  only  a  small  area, 


52  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

but  there  is  really  no  good  reason  to  adopt  this  assumption 
unless  a  cause  can  be  shown  for  a  local  deglaciation.1 

The  importance  of  all  this  evidence  is  obvious  when  we 
realize  that,  as  late  as  1 950,  there  appeared  to  be  no  question 
but  that  the  icecap  in  Antarctica  was  millions  of  years  old. 
According  to  Brooks,  the  geologists  Wright  and  Priestly  had 
presented  conclusive  evidence  of  the  beginning  of  the  present 
icecap  as  far  back  as  the  beginning  of  the  Tertiary  Period 
(52:239),  some  60  or  80  million  years  ago.  Now  we  have  evi- 
dence of  several  periods  of  semiglacial  or  nonglacial  condi- 
tions in  Antarctica  in  the  Pleistocene  Epoch  alone.  This  is 
sufficient  to  show  us  how  little  reliance  can  be  placed  upon  the 
estimated  durations  of  hundreds  of  thousands  or  millions  of 
years  for  the  glacial  periods  of  the  remote  past. 

We  must  realize,  however,  that  the  date  found  by  Urry  for 
the  beginning  of  the  deposition  of  glacial  sediment  on  the 

1  An  astonishing  bit  of  evidence  suggesting  the  idea  of  a  temperate  age  in  Ant- 
arctica has  been  produced  by  Arlington  H.  Mallery,  cartographer  and  archae- 
ologist. Mr.  Mallery  solved  the  projection  of  an  ancient  map  compiled  in  the 
sixteenth  century  by  the  Turkish  geographer  Piri  Reis,  from  maps  one  of  which 
is  said  to  have  been  in  the  possession  of  Columbus,  and  the  others  of  which 
were  said  by  Piri  Reis  to  have  been  preserved  in  the  East  since  the  time  of 
Alexander  the  Great  (who  may  have  discovered  them  in  Egypt).  The  projection 
had  long  baffled  scientists,  including  the  explorer-scientist  Nordenskjold,  who 
had  spent  seventeen  years  trying  to  solve  it.  When  Mr.  Mallery  solved  the  pro- 
jection he  found  that  the  map  showed  all  the  coasts  of  South  America,  a  great 
part  of  the  coast  of  Antarctica,  including  Queen  Maud  Land  and  the  Palmer 
Peninsula,  and  Greenland  and  Alaska.  It  appeared  that  the  mapping  of  Antarc- 
tica had  actually  been  done  when  the  land  was  ice- free— before  the  icecap  ap- 
peared. There  was  no  indication  as  to  what  ancient  people  could  have  made 
the  map,  but  Mr.  Mallery  concluded  that  the  information  on  the  map  was  at 
least  five  thousand  years  old,  and  perhaps  much  o^der.  The  topographic  fea- 
tures on  the  map  of  Queen  Maud  Land  corresponded  remarkably  to  the  fea- 
tures deduced  from  seismic  profiles  made  during  one  of  the  recent  Antarctic 
expeditions  of  the  Navy.  Mr.  Mallery's  statements  were  confirmed  and  sup- 
ported by  Mr.  M.  I.  Walters,  who,  as  a  member  of  the  Hydrographic  Office,  had 
checked  the  map  in  detail,  and  by  Father  Daniel  Linehan,  Director  of  the 
Weston  Observatory  of  Boston  College,  who  checked  the  seismic  profile  made 
by  the  Navy  against  the  data  on  the  map.  Mr.  Mallery's  findings  were  presented 
in  a  radio  broadcast  by  the  Georgetown  University  Forum,  Washington,  D.C., 
in  August,  1956.  A  verbatim  report  of  the  broadcast,  with  reproductions  of  the 
map,  may  be  obtained  from  the  Forum. 


THEICEAGES  53 

bottom  of  the  Ross  Sea  6,000  years  ago  is  not  the  date  of  the 
beginning  of  the  last  change  of  climate  in  Antarctica.  A  con- 
siderable time  must  have  elapsed  between  the  fall  of  tempera- 
ture on  the  continent  and  the  beginning  of  the  deposition  of 
the  glacial  sediment.  An  icecap  must  grow  to  a  considerable 
thickness  before  it  can  start  to  move  by  gravity,  and  can  start 
to  throw  off  icebergs  at  the  coast.  Moreover,  we  must  suppose 
that  the  change  of  climate  must  have  been  gradual  at  first.  It 
seems  reasonable,  therefore,  to  allow  a  period  of  the  order 
of  about  10,000  years  from  the  time  the  climate  started  to 
change  to  the  time  when  the  glacial  sediment  began  to  be 
deposited  on  the  sea  bottom.  This  is  all  the  more  likely  since 
most  of  the  coasts  of  Antarctica  seem  to  be  bounded  by  moun- 
tain chains,  which  the  icecap  would  have  to  cross. 

Where  do  these  considerations  lead  us?  They  lead  us  to  the 
conclusion  that  the  melting  of  the  great  icecap  in  North 
America  about  10,000  years  ago  and  the  beginning  of  the 
massive  advance  of  the  Antarctic  icecap  may  have  been 
roughly  contemporary;  that  as  one  icecap  melted,  the  other 
one  grew. 

Let  us  pause  to  consider  the  implications  of  this  astonish- 
ing conclusion.  For  one  thing,  it  is  clear  that  no  such  change 
as  the  growth  or  removal  of  even  a  considerable  part  of  a 
continental  icecap  covering  6,000,000  square  miles  of  the 
earth's  surface  can  result  from  purely  local  causes.  At  present 
the  Antarctic  icecap  profoundly  affects  the  climate  of  the 
whole  world.  The  great  anticyclonic  winds,  blowing  outward 
from  the  continent  in  all  directions,  influence  the  directions 
of  ocean  currents,  and  the  climates  of  all  the  lands  in  the 
Southern  Hemisphere.  The  North  American  icecap  was 
equally  a  factor  in k  world  climate.  If  one  icecap  appeared 
when  the  other  disappeared,  then  both  of  these  great  con- 
temporary changes  of  climate  must  be  supposed  to  have  re- 
sulted from  some  cause  operating  on  the  globe  as  a  whole. 
But  what  kind  of  cause  could  glaciate  one  continent  and 
deglaciate  the  other?  It  seems  quite  clear  that  only  a  shift  of 
the  crust  of  the  earth  such  as  would  have  moved  America 


54  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

away  from  one  polar  zone  and  Antarctica  toward  the  other 
one  can  adequately  account  for  the  facts.  Moreover,  it  is  true, 
as  can  be  seen  from  any  globe,  that  a  movement  of  the  crust 
sufficient  to  bring  Hudson  Bay  down  to  its  present  latitude 
from  the  pole  would  at  the  same  time  account  for  the  glacia- 
tion  of  all  that  half  of  Antarctica  facing  the  Ross  Sea. 

There  are  a  number  of  important  conclusions  to  be  drawn 
from  these  Antarctic  data,  in  addition  to  the  remarkable  con- 
firmation of  a  displacement  of  the  crust.  One  is  that  the  rapid 
rate  of  change  indicated  for  the  Wisconsin  icecap  may  be 
typical  for  the  whole  Pleistdcene,  and  therefore,  very  likely, 
typical  of  older  periods  in  the  earth's  history.  Hardly  less 
important  than  this  is  the  implication  to  be  drawn  from  the 
apparent  fact  that  the  ice  ages,  in  these  two  instances,  were 
not  contemporaneous.  It  follows,  of  course,  that  if  the  ice 
ages  we  know  most  about  were  not  contemporary  in  the  two 
hemispheres,  there  is  no  justification  for  assuming  that  those 
we  know  little  or  nothing  about  were  contemporary.  Clearly, 
with  glacial  periods  so  short,  and  the  tempo  of  change  so 
rapid,  there  is  no  justification  for  claiming  glaciation  in  the 
two  hemispheres  hundreds  of  millions  of  years  ago  to  have 
been  simultaneous.  This  theory,  which  constitutes  a  harmful 
dogma  of  contemporary  science,  should  now  be  abandoned, 
and  with  it  must  go  most  of  the  current  speculations  about 
the  causes  of  ice  ages. 

I  cannot  conclude  this  chapter  without  warning  the  reader 
that,  however  clear  these  facts  may  be,  there  are  still  some 
who  will  insist  that  the  Hough-Urry  cores  show  that  the  re- 
cent glaciations  were  simultaneous  in  the  two  hemispheres. 
This  argument  is  based  on  the  strange  period  of  high  tempera- 
ture that  followed  the  ice  age  in  North  America,  but  was 
world-wide  in  its  effects.  This  warm  period  has  been  well  es- 
tablished, but  its  cause  has  been  unknown.  The  essential  facts 
are  given  by  Professor  Flint: 

.  .  .  the  evidence  of  the  fossil  plants,  and,  in  addition,  several  en- 
tirely independent  lines  of  evidence,  establish  beyond  doubt  that  the 
climate  (with  some  fluctuation)  reached  a  maximum  of  warmth  be- 


THE     ICE     AGES  55 

tween  6,000  and  4,000  years  ago;  since  then  (again  with  minor  fluctua- 
tions) it  has  become  cooler  and  more  moist  down  to  the  present  time. 
Apparently  as  recently  as  500  B.C.  the  climate  was  still  slightly  warmer 
than  it  is  today.  The  warm,  relatively  dry  interval  of  2000  years'  dura- 
tion has  been  called  the  Climatic  Optimum.  It  is  the  outstanding 
fact  of  the  so-called  post-glacial  climatic  history  (156:487). 

Dr.  Hough  attempts  to  identify  the  last  warm  period  in 
Antarctica  with  this  Climatic  Optimum,  but  we  have  seen 
that,  according  to  his  own  core,  the  last  temperate  period  in 
Antarctica  apparently  began  15,000  years  ago,  and  ended 
6,000  years  ago,  thus  enduring  for  some  9,000  years,  while 
the  Climatic  Optimum  began  6,000  years  ago,  when  the  tem- 
perate age  was  drawing  to  a  close  in  Antarctica,  and  endured 
for  only  2,000  years.  It  seems  to  me,  therefore,  that  there  is 
no  good  reason  to  identify  the  two. 

For  some  time  attempts  were  made  to  attack  the  reliability 
of  the  ionium  method.  I  raised  the  question  of  these  attacks 
in  a  conversation  with  Einstein  and  received  assurance  that 
in  his  opinion  the  method  was  reliable.  Ericson  and  Wollin 
have  recently  shown  that  the  results  obtained  by  the  ionium 
method  agree  very  well  with  results  achieved  by  other  relia- 
ble means  (Chapter  IX).  We  shall  have  occasion  to  cite  the 
work  of  Soviet  scientists  who  appear  to  have  used  the  ionium 
method  successfully  in  the  Arctic  Ocean,  and  to  have  ob- 
tained results  in  good  agreement  with  other  methods  of  dat- 
ing. We  shall  see  that  they  have  found  a  warm  period  for  the 
Arctic  to  correspond  with  the  warm  period  indicated  for  Ant- 
arctica, and  at  about  the  same  time,  just  as  we  should  expect 
if  both  areas  lay  outside  of  the  polar  circles  when  the  last 
North  American  icecap  was  centered  at  Hudson  Bay. 

Volchok  and  Kulp  have  recently  published  the  results  of 
a  study  by  which  some  sources  of  errors  in  the  use  of  the  ion- 
ium method  for  dating  have  been  identified.  Their  results 
suggest  that  in  some  cases  errors  in  dating  may  result  from 
the  use  of  cores  that  have  not  been  continuously  deposited, 
or  that  have  been  disturbed  since  their  original  deposition. 
However,  in  the  cases^of  the  Ross  Sea  cores  cited  above  we 


56  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

have  three  cores  taken  some  distance  apart  that  seem,  never- 
theless, to  agree  pretty  well  with  each  other,  even  though 
there  are  evidences  of  some  disturbance,  and  their  evidence 
is  strengthened  by  their  agreement  with  the  Arctic  cores  to 
be  discussed  later  on. 

From  our  point  of  view,  the  precise  accuracy  of  the  dating 
is  less  important  than  the  evidence  that,  in  very  recent  time, 
there  was  deposition  of  temperate  type  sediment  in  the  Ross 
Sea  off  the  Antarctic  coast. 

6.  Conclusion 

It  is  clear  that  none  of  the  great  glaciations  of  the  past  can 
be  explained  by  the  theories  hitherto  advanced.  The  only 
ice  age  that  is  adequately  explained  is  the  present  ice  age  in 
Antarctica.  This  is  excellently  explained.  It  exists,  quite  obvi- 
ously, because  Antarctica  is  at  the  pole,  and  for  no  other 
reason.  No  variation  of  the  sun's  heat,  no  galactic  dust,  no 
volcanism,  no  subcrustal  currents,  and  no  arrangements  of 
land  elevations  or  sea  currents  account  for  the  fact.  We  may 
conclude  that  the  best  theory  to  account  for  an  ice  age  is 
that  the  area  concerned  was  at  a  pole.  We  thus  account  for 
the  Indian  and  African  ice  sheets,  though  the  areas  once  occu- 
pied by  them  are  now  in  the  tropics.  We  account  for  all  ice 
sheets  of  continental  size  in  the  same  way. 

Stokes  has  provided  an  excellent  list  of  specifications  for  a 
satisfactory  ice  age  theory,  every  one  of  which  is  met  by  the 
assumption  of  crust  displacements  as  the  fundamental  cause 
(405:815-16): 

a.  An  initiating  event  or  condition. 

b.  A  mechanism  for  cyclic  repetitions  or  oscillations  within 
the  general  period  of  glaciation. 

c.  A  terminating  condition  or  event. 

d.  It  should  not  rely  upon  unprovable,  unobservable,  or 
unpredictable  conditions,  when  well-known  or  more 
simple  ones  will  suffice. 


THE     ICE     AGES  57 

e.  It  must  solve  the  problem  of  increased  precipitation 
with  colder  climate. 

f.  The  facts  call  for  a  mechanism  that  either  increases  the 
precipitation  or  lowers  the  temperature  very  gradually 
over  a  period  of  thousands  of  years. 

It  is  evident  that  a  displacement  of  the  crust  could  initiate 
an  ice  age  by  moving  a  certain  region  into  a  polar  zone,  while 
a  later  displacement  could  end  the  ice  age  by  moving  the 
same  area  away  from  the  polar  zone.  The  increased  precipita- 
tion and  the  oscillations  of  the  borders  of  the  ice  sheets  can 
be  explained  by  the  atmospheric  effects  that  would  result 
from  volcanism  associated  with  the  movement  of  the  crust. 
These  effects  will  be  discussed  in  later  chapters. 


Ill  :  ANCIENT  CLIMATES 


In  the  last  chapter  it  was  argued  that  the  ice  ages  can  be 
explained  only  by  the  assumption  of  frequent  displacements 
of  the  earth's  crust.  The  ice  ages,  however,  represent  only  one 
side  of  the  problem.  If  they  are  instances  of  extremely  cold 
climates  distributed  in  an  unexplained  manner  on  the  earth's 
surface,  there  were  also  warm  climates  whose  distribution  is 
equally  unexplained. 

In  connection  with  these  warm  climates  in  the  present 
polar  regions,  there  arises  a  contradiction  of  an  especially 
glaring  character.  On  the  one  hand  there  is  evidence  that  the 
distribution  of  plants  and  animals  in  the  past  did  not,  as  a 
rule,  follow  the  present  arrangements  of  the  climatic  zones. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  trend  of  the  new  evidence  is  to  show 
that  climatic  zones  have  always  been  about  as  clearly  dis- 
tinguished by  temperature  differences  as  they  are  today.  This 
is  in  flat  contradiction  to  the  assumption,  still  widely  held, 
that  the  earth,  during  most  of  geological  history,  did  not 
possess  clearly  demarcated  climatic  zones.  We  are  forced  to 
conclude  that,  since  many  ancient  plants  and  animals  were 
not  distributed  according  to  the  present  climatic  zones,  the 
zones  themselves  have  changed  position  on  the  earth's  surface. 
This  requires,  as  we  have  seen,  that  the  surface  shall  have 
changed  position  relative  to  the  axis  of  rotation.  We  shall 
now  examine  the  evidence  that  supports  this  conclusion. 


/.  Ages  of  Bloom  in  Antarctica 

1  have  suggested  that  in  very  recent  time,  no  more  than 
10,000  years  ago,  a  large  part  of  Antarctica  may  have  been 
ice-free.  If  this  interpretation  of  the  marine  cores  from  the 
Ross  Sea  is  questioned  by  the  conservative-minded,  there 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  59 

can,  however,  be  no  dispute  whatever  about  the  more  distant 
past  climates  of  Antarctica.  Those  who  may  be  inclined  to 
disbelieve  that  Antarctica  could  have  possessed  a  temperate 
climate  10,000  years  ago  must  be  reminded  of  the  evidence 
that  Antarctica  has  many  times  possessed  such  a  climate. 

So  far  as  we  know  at  present,  the  very  first  evidence  of  an 
ice  age  in  Antarctica  comes  from  the  Eocene  Epoch  (52:244). 
This  was  barely  60,000,000  years  ago.  Before  that,  for  some 
billion  and  a  half  years,  there  is  no  suggestion  of  polar  condi- 
tions, though  very  many  earlier  ice  ages  existed  in  other  parts 
of  the  earth.  Henry,  in  The  White  Continent,  cites  evidence 
of  the  passing  of  long  temperate  ages  in  Antarctica.  He  de- 
scribes the  Edsel  Ford  Mountains,  discovered  by  Admiral 
Byrd  in  1929.  These  mountains  are  of  nonvolcanic,  folded 
sedimentary  rocks,  the  layers  adding  up  to  15,000  feet  in 
thickness.  Henry  suggests  that  they  indicate  long  periods  of 
temperate  climate  in  Antarctica: 

The  greater  part  of  the  erosion  probably  took  place  when  Antarctica 
was  essentially  free  of  ice,  since  the  structure  of  the  rocks  indicates 
strongly  that  the  original  sediment  from  which  they  were  formed  was 
carried  by  water.  Such  an  accumulation  calls  for  an  immensely  long 
period  of  tepid  peace  in  the  life  of  the  rampaging  planet  (206:113). 

Most  sedimentary  rocks  are  laid  down  in  the  sea,  formed 
of  sediment  brought  down  by  rivers  from  near-by  lands.  The 
lands  from  which  the  Antarctic  sediments  were  brought  seem 
to  have  disappeared  without  a  trace,  but  of  the  sea  that  once 
existed  where  there  is  now  land  we  have  plenty  of  evidence. 
Brooks  remarks: 

...  In  the  Cambrian  we  have  evidence  of  a  moderately  warm  sea 
stretching  nearly  or  right  across  Antarctica,  in  the  form  of  thick  lime- 
stones very  rich  in  reef-building  Archaeocyathidae  (52:245). 

Millions  of  years  later,  when  these  marine  formations  had 
appeared  above  the  sea,  warm  climates  brought  forth  a  luxu- 
riant vegetation  in  Antarctica.  Thus,  Sir  Ernest  Shackleton 
is  said  to  have  found  coal  beds  within  200  miles  of  the  South 
Pole  (71:80),  and  later,  during  the  Byrd  expedition  of  1935, 


60  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

geologists  made  a  rich  discovery  of  fossils  on  the  sides  of  lofty 
Mount  Weaver,  in  Latitude  86°  58'  S.,  about  the  same  dis- 
tance from  the  pole,  and  two  miles  above  sea  level.  These 
included  leaf  and  stem  impressions,  and  fossilized  wood.  In 
1952  Dr.  Lyman  H.  Dougherty,  of  the  Carnegie  Institution 
of  Washington,  completing  a  study  of  these  fossils,  identified 
two  species  of  a  tree  fern  called  Glossopteris,  once  common 
to  the  other  southern  continents  (Africa,  South  America, 
Australia),  and  a  giant  tree  fern  of  another  species.  In  addi- 
tion, he  identified  a  fossil  footprint  as  that  of  a  mammallike 
reptile.  Henry  suggests  that  this  may  mean  that  Antarctica, 
during  its  period  of  intensive  vegetation,  was  one  of  the  most 
advanced  lands  of  the  world  as  to  its  life  forms  (207). 

Soviet  scientists  have  reported  finding  evidences  of  a  trop- 
ical flora  in  Graham  Land,  another  part  of  Antarctica,  dating 
from  the  early  Tertiary  Period  (perhaps  from  the  Paleocene 
or  Eocene)  (364:13). 

It  is,  then,  little  wonder  that  Priestly,  in  his  account  of  his 
expedition  to  Antarctica,  should  have  concluded: 

.  .  .  There  can  be  no  doubt  from  what  this  expedition  and 
other  expeditions  have  found  that  several  times  at  least  during  past 
ages  the  Antarctic  has  possessed  a  climate  much  more  genial  than  that 
of  England  at  the  present  day  ,  .  .  (34913:210). 

Further  evidence  is  provided  by  the  discovery  by  British 
geologists  of  great  fossil  forests  in  Antarctica,  of  the  same  type 
that  grew  on  the  Pacific  coast  of  the  United  States  20,000,000 
years  ago  (206:9).  This,  of  course,  shows  that  after  the  earliest 
known  Antarctic  glaciation  in  the  Eocene,  the  continent  did 
not  remain  glacial,  but  had  later  episodes  of  warm  climate. 

Dr.  Umbgrove  adds  the  observation  that  in  the  Jurassic 
Period  the  flora  of  Antarctica,  England,  North  America,  and 
India  had  many  plants  in  common  (430:263). 

There  is  one  group  of  theories  to  which  we  cannot  appeal 
because  of  their  inherent  and  obvious  weaknesses.  These 
are  the  theories  that  try  to  explain  warm  and  cold  periods  in 
Antarctica  by  changes  in  land  elevations,  changes  in  the 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  6l 

directions  of  ocean  currents,  changes  in  the  intensity  of  solar 
radiation,  and  the  like.  It  is  obvious,  for  instance,  that  no 
hypothetical  warm  currents  could  make  possible  the  existence 
of  warm  climates  in  the  center  of  the  great  Antarctic  conti- 
nent if  that  continent  were  at  the  pole,  and  if  by  some  miracle 
Antarctica  did  become  warm,  how  possibly  could  forests  have 
flourished  there  deprived  of  sunlight  for  half  the  year? 


2.  Warm  Ages  in  the  North 

The  Arctic  regions  have  been  more  accessible,  and  conse- 
quently they  have  been  more  thoroughly  explored,  than  the 
Antarctic.  It  was  from  them  that  the  first  evidence  came 
pointing  unmistakably  to  shifts  in  the  geographical  positions 
of  the  poles.  Most  of  the  theories  developed  by  those  defend- 
ing the  dogma  of  the  permanence  of  the  poles  were  specially 
designed  to  explain  these  facts,  or  rather,  as  it  now  seems,  to 
explain  them  away. 

One  method  of  explaining  away  the  evidence  was  to  sug- 
gest that  the  plants  and  animals  of  past  geological  eras,  even 
though  they  belonged  to  similar  genera  or  families  as  living 
plants,  and  closely  resembled  them  in  structure,  may  have 
been  adapted  to  very  different  climates.  This  argument  often 
had  effect,  for  no  one  could  exclude  the  possibility  that,  in  a 
long  geological  period,  species  might  make  successful  adjust- 
ments to  different  climatic  conditions.  Where  single  plants 
were  involved  such  a  possibility  could  not  be  dismissed. 
Where,  however,  whole  groups  of  species,  whole  floras  and 
faunas,  were  involved,  there  was  increased  improbability  that 
they  could  all  have  been  adjusted  at  any  one  time  to  a  radi- 
cally different  environment  from  that  in  which  their  de- 
scendants live  today.  For  this  reason,  and  because  the 
structure  of  plants  has  a  definite  relationship  to  conditions 
of  sunlight,  heat,  and  moisture,  biologists  have  abandoned 
this  method  of  explaining  the  facts.  Dr.  Barghoorn,  for  ex- 


62  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

ample,  says  that  fossil  plants  are  reliable  indicators  of  past 

climate  (375:237~38)- 

It  may  be  worth  while  to  review,  very  briefly,  some  high 
points  of  the  climatic  history  of  the  Arctic  and  sub-Arctic 
regions,  beginning  with  one  of  the  oldest  periods,  the  Devo- 
nian, and  coming  down  by  degrees  to  periods  nearer  our 
own.  (During  this  discussion  the  reader  may  find  it  helpful 
to  refer  to  the  table  of  geological  periods,  page  23.) 

The  Devonian  evidence  is  particularly  rich,  and  includes 
both  fauna  and  flora.  Dr.  Colbert,  of  the  American  Museum 
of  Natural  History,  has  pointed  out  that  the  first  known 
amphibians  have  been  found  in  this  period  in  eastern  Green- 
land, near  the  Arctic  Circle,  though  they  must  have  required 
a  warm  climate  (375:256).  Many  species  of  reef  corals,  which 
at  present  require  an  all-year  sea-water  temperature  of  not 
less  than  68°  F.  (102:108),  have  been  found  in  Ellesmere  Is- 
land, far  to  the  north  of  the  Arctic  Circle  (399:2).  Devonian 
tree  ferns  have  been  found  from  southern  Russia  to  Bear 
Island,  in  the  Arctic  Ocean  (177:360).  According  to  Barg- 
hoorn,  assemblages  of  Devonian  plants  have  been  found  in 
the  Falkland  Islands,  where  a  cold  climate  now  prevails,  in 
Spitzbergen,  and  in  Ellesmere  Island,  as  well  as  in  Asia  and 
America  (375:240).  In  view  of  this,  he  remarks: 

The  known  distribution  of  Devonian  plants,  especially  their  diversi- 
fication in  high  latitudes,  suggests  that  glacial  conditions  did  not  exist 
at  the  poles  (375:240). 

In  the  following  period,  the  Carboniferous,  we  have  evi- 
dence summed  up  by  Alfred  Russel  Wallace,  co-author,  with 
Darwin,  of  the  theory  of  evolution: 

In  the  Carboniferous  formation  we  again  meet  with  plant  remains 
and  beds  of  true  coal  in  the  Arctic  regions.  Lepidodendrons  and 
calamites,  together  with  large  spreading  ferns,  are  found  at  Spitz- 
bergen, and  at  Bear  Island  in  the  extreme  north  of  Eastern  Siberia; 
while  marine  deposits  of  the  same  age  contain  an  abundance  of  large 
stony  corals  (446:202). 

In  the  Permian,  following  the  Carboniferous,  Colbert  re- 
ports a  find  of  fossil  reptiles  in  what  is  now  a  bitterly  cold 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  6j 

region:  ' 'Large  Permian  reptiles  .  .  .  are  found  along  the 
Dvina  River  of  Russia,  just  below  the  Arctic  Circle,  at  a 
North  Latitude  of  65°  "  (375:259).  Dr.  Colbert  explains  that 
these  reptiles  must  have  required  a  warm  climate.  In  sum- 
ming up  the  problem  of  plant  life  for  the  many  long  ages 
of  the  Paleozoic  Era,  from  the  Devonian  through  the  Per- 
mian, Barghoorn  says  that  it  is  "one  of  the  great  enigmas"  o£ 
science  (375:*43>- 

Coming  now  to  the  Mesozoic  Era  (comprising  the  Triassic, 
Jurassic,  and  Cretaceous  Periods),  Colbert  reports  that  in  the 
Triassic  some  amphibians  (the  Labyrinthodonts)  ranged  all 
the  way  from  40°  S.  Lat.  to  80°  N.  Lat.  About  this  time  the 
warm-water  Ichthyosaurus  lived  at  Spitzbergen  (375:262-64). 
For  the  Jurassic,  Wallace  reports: 

In  the  Jurassic  Period,  for  example,  we  have  proofs  of  a  mild  arctic 
climate,  in  the  abundant  plant  remains  of  East  Siberia  and  Amurland. 
.  .  .  But  even  more  remarkable  are  the  marine  remains  found  in 
many  places  in  high  northern  latitudes,  among  which  we  may  espe- 
cially mention  the  numerous  ammonites  and  the  vertebrae  of  huge 
reptiles  of  the  genera  Ichthyosaurus  and  Teleosaurus  found  in  Jurassic 
deposits  of  the  Parry  Islands  in  77°  N.  Lat.  (446:202). 

For  the  Cretaceous  Period,  A.  C.  Seward  reported  in  1932 
that  "the  commonest  Cretaceous  ferns  [of  Greenland]  are 
closely  allied  to  species  ...  in  the  southern  tropics"  (373: 
363-71).  Gutenberg  remarks:  "Thus,  certain  regions,  such 
as  Iceland  or  Antarctica,  which  are  very  cold  now,  for  the  late 
Paleozoic  or  the  Mesozoic  era  show  clear  indications  of  what 
we  would  call  subtropical  climate  today,  but  no  trace  of 
glaciation;  at  the  same  time  other  regions  were  at  least  tempo- 
rarily glaciated'1  (194:195).  This  evidence,  linked  in  this  way 
with  the  problem  of  the  ice  ages  we  have  already  discussed, 
reveals  the  existence  of  a  single  problem.  Ice  ages  in  low 
latitudes,  and  warm  ages  near  the  poles,  are,  so  to  speak,  the 
sides  of  a  single  coin.  A  successful  theory  must  explain  both 
of  them. 

Following  the  Cretaceous,  the  Tertiary  Period  shows  the 
same  failure  of  the  fauna  and  flora  to  observe  our  present 


64  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

climatic  zones.  Scott,  for  example,  says:  "The  very  rich  floras 
from  the  Green  River  shales,  from  the  Wilcox  of  the  Gulf 
Coast  and  from  the  Eocene  of  Greenland,  show  that  the 
climate  was  warmer  than  in  the  Paleocene,  and  much  warmer 
than  today"  (372:103). 

In  this  Eocene  Epoch  we  find  evidence  of  warm  climate  in 
the  north  that  is  truly  overwhelming.  Captain  Nares,  one  of 
the  earlier  explorers  of  the  Arctic,  described  a  twenty-five-foot 
seam  of  coal  that  he  thought  was  comparable  in  quality  to 
the  best  Welsh  coal,  containing  fossils  similar  to  the  Miocene 
fossils  of  Spitsbergen.  He  saw  it  near  Watercourse  Bay,  in 
northern  Greenland  (319:!!,  141-42).  Closer  examination 
revealed  that  it  was,  in  reality,  lignite.  Nevertheless,  the  con- 
tained fossils  clearly  indicated  a  climate  completely  different 
from  the  present  climate  of  northern  Greenland: 

The  Grinnell  Land  lignite  indicates  a  thick  peat  moss,  with  prob- 
ably a  small  lake,  with  water  lilies  on  the  surface  of  the  water,  and 
reeds  on  the  edges,  and  birches  and  poplars,  and  taxodias,  on  the 
banks,  with  pines,  firs,  spruce,  elms  and  hazel  bushes  on  the  neighbor- 
ing hills  .  .  .  (319:11,335). 

Brooks  thinks  that  the  formation  of  peat  bogs  requires  a 
rainfall  of  at  least  forty  inches  a  year,  and  a  mean  tempera- 
ture above  32°  F.  (52:173).  This  suggests  a  very  sharp  con- 
trast with  present  Arctic  conditions  in  Grinnell  Land. 

DeRance  and  Feilden,  who  did  the  paleontological  work 
for  Captain  Nares,  also  mention  a  Miocene  tree,  the  swamp 
cypress,  that  flourished  from  Central  Italy  to  82°  N.  Lat.,  that 
is,  to  within  five  hundred  miles  of  the  pole  (319:!!,  335). 
They  show  that  the  Miocene  floras  of  Grinnell  Land,  Green- 
land, and  Spitzbergen  all  required  temperate  climatic  condi- 
tions, with  plentiful  moisture.  They  mention  especially  the 
water  lilies  of  Spitzbergen,  which  would  have  required  flow- 
ing water  for  the  greater  part  of  the  year  (319:!!,  336). 

In  connection  with  the  flora  of  Spitzbergen,  and  the  fauna 
mentioned  earlier,  it  should  be  realized  that  the  island  is  in 
polar  darkness  for  half  the  year.  It  lies  on  the  Arctic  Circle, 
as  far  north  of  Labrador  as  Labrador  is  north  of  Bermuda. 


Wallace  describes  the  flora  of  the  Miocene.  He  points  out 
that  in  Asia  and  in  North  America  this  flora  was  composed 
of  species  that  apparently  required  a  climate  similar  to  that 
of  our  southern  states,  yet  it  is  also  found  in  Greenland  at 
70°  N.  Lat.,  where  it  contained  many  of  the  same  trees  that 
were  then  growing  in  Europe.  He  adds: 

But  even  farther  North,  in  Spitsbergen,  78°  and  79°  N.  Lat.  and 
one  of  the  most  barren  and  inhospitable  regions  on  the  globe,  an 
almost  equally  rich  fossil  flora  has  been  discovered,  including  several 
of  the  Greenland  species,  and  others  peculiar,  but  mostly  of  the  same 
genera.  There  seem  to  be  no  evergreens  here  except  coniferae,  one  of 
which  is  identical  with  the  swamp-cypress  (Taxodium  distichum)  now 
found  living  in  the  Southern  United  States.  There  are  also  eleven 
pines,  two  Libocedrus,  two  Sequoias,  with  oaks,  poplars,  birches, 
planes,  limes,  a  hazel,  an  ash,  and  a  walnut;  also  water  lilies,  pond 
weeds,  and  an  Iris— altogether  about  a  hundred  species  of  flowering 
plants.  Even  in  Grinnell  Land,  within  8i/£  degrees  of  the  pole,  a 
similar  flora  existed  .  .  .  (446:182-84). 

It  has  been  necessary  to  dwell  at  length  on  the  evidence  of 
the  warm  polar  climates,  because  this  is  important  for  the 
discussion  that  follows.  Too  often,  in  theoretical  discussions, 
the  specific  nature  of  the  evidence  tends  to  be  lost  sight  of. 


3.  Universal  Temperate  Climates—A  Fallacy 

The  evidence  I  have  presented  above  (and  a  great  deal  more, 
omitted  for  reasons  of  space)  has  long  created  a  dilemma  for 
geology.  Only  two  practical  solutions  have  offered  themselves. 
One  is  to  shift  the  crust,  and  the  other  is  to  suggest  that 
climatic  zones  like  the  present  have  not  always  existed.  It  is 
often  suggested  that  the  climates  have  been  very  mild  virtu- 
ally from  pole  to  pole,  at  certain  times.  The  extent  to  which 
this  theory  is  still  supported  is  eloquent  evidence  of  the 
power  of  the  "dogma"  of  the  permanence  of  the  poles.  When 
one  inquires  as  to  the  evidence  for  the  existence  of  such 
warm,  moist  climates,  a  peculiar  situation  is  revealed.  There 
is  no  evidence  except  the  fossil  evidence  that  the  theory  is 


66  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

supposed  to  explain.  Could  there  be  a  better  example  of 
reasoning  in  a  circle?  Colbert  cites  evidence  that  the  Devo- 
nian animals  were  spread  all  over  the  world,  and  then  re- 
marks that  therefore  ".  .  .  it  is  reasonable  to  assume  .  .  . 
that  the  Devonian  Period  was  a  time  of  widely  spread  equable 
climates,  a  period  of  uniformity  over  much  of  the  earth's 
surface"  (375:255).  According  to  him,  the  same  situation  held 
true  through  the  Paleozoic  and  Mesozoic,  and  even  much 
later  periods  (375:268).  Other  paleontologists  reasoned  in  the 
same  way.  Goldring,  for  example,  remarked:  "The  Carbonif- 
erous plants  had  a  world-wide  distribution,  suggesting  rather 
uniform  climatic  conditions"  (177:362).  She  drew  the  same 
conclusions  from  the  world-wide  distribution  of  Jurassic  flora 
(177:363).  But  it  is  clear  that  when  a  theory  has  been  con- 
cocted to  explain  a  given  set  of  facts,  those  facts  themselves 
cannot  be  adduced  as  proof  of  the  theory.  This  is  circular 
reasoning.  A  theory  must,  first,  be  shown  to  be  inherently 
reasonable,  and  then  it  must  be  supported  by  independent 
facts. 

Is  such  a  theory  inherently  reasonable?  The  answer  is  that 
it  is  not.  It  involves,  in  the  first  place,  ignoring  the  astro- 
nomical relations  of  the  earth.  The  theory  requires  us  to 
assume  the  existence  of  some  factor  powerful  enough  to  coun- 
teract the  variation  of  the  sun's  heat  with  latitude.  As  Pro- 
fessor Bain,  of  Amherst,  has  pointed  out,  in  an  article  to  be 
discussed  further  below, 

.  /•'.  The  thermal  energy  arriving  at  the  earth's  surface  per  day 
per  square  centimeter  averages  430  gram  calories  at  the  equator  but 
declines  to  292  gram  calories  at  the  4Oth  parallel  and  to  87  gram 
calories  at  the  Both  parallel  .  .  .  (18:16). 

What  force  sufficiently  powerful  to  counteract  that  fact  of 
astronomy  can  be  suggested,  and,  more  important,  supported 
by  convincing  evidence? 

It  was  thought  at  first  that  universal  temperate  climates 
might  be  accounted  for  by  the  theory  of  the  cooling  of  the 
earth.  Those  who  proposed  this  theory  (253,  292)  argued  that 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  67 

in  earlier  ages  the  earth  was  hotter,  the  ocean  water  evapo- 
rated much  more  rapidly,  and  it  formed  thick  clouds  that 
reflected  the  sun's  radiant  energy  back  into  space.  The  cloud 
blanket  shut  out  the  sun's  radiation  but  kept  in  the  heat  that 
radiated  from  the  earth  itself,  and  this  acted  to  distribute  the 
heat  evenly  over  the  globe.  The  cloud  blanket  must  have 
been  thick  enough  to  make  the  earth  a  dark,  dank,  and  dismal 
place.  Since,  as  Dr.  Colbert  shows,  fossils  are  found  outside 
the  present  zones  appropriate  to  them  even  in  recent  geolog- 
ical periods,  such  conditions  must  have  obtained  during 
about  90  per  cent  of  the  earth's  whole  history,  and  most  of 
the  evolution  of  living  forms  must  have  taken  place  in  them. 

For  a  number  of  reasons,  including  the  difficulty  of  ex- 
plaining how  plants  can  have  evolved  without  sunlight,  this 
theory  has  been  abandoned.  We  have  also  seen  that  the  idea 
that  the  earth  was  even  hotter  than  now  has  recently  been 
undermined.  This  has  destroyed  the  solidity  of  the  theory's 
basic  assumption. 

The  fact  that  the  theory  never  was  reasonable  is  shown 
from  Coleman's  arguments  against  it,  advanced  more  than  a 
quarter  of  a  century  ago.  He  pointed  out  that  not  only  are 
ice  ages  known  from  the  earliest  periods  (from  the  Pre- 
Cambrian)  but  there  is  evidence  that  some  of  these  very 
ancient  ice  ages  were  even  more  intensely  cold  than  the 
recent  ice  age  that  came  to  an  end  10,000  years  ago  (87:78). 
No  less  than  six  ice  ages  are  known  from  the  Pre-Cambrian 
(430:260).  The  evidence  of  one  of  these  Pre-Cambrian  or 
Lower  Cambrian  ice  ages  is  interestingly  described  by 
Brews  ter: 

In  China,  in  the  latitude  of  northern  Florida,  there  is  a  hundred 
and  seventy  feet  of  obvious  glacial  till,  scratched  boulders  and  all, 
and  over  it  lie  sea-floor  muds  containing  lower  Cambrian  trilobites, 
the  whole  now  altered  to  hard  rock  (45:204). 

It  is  obvious  that  such  ice  ages  (and  evidences  of  more  of 
them  are  frequently  coming  to  light)  are  in  conflict  with  the 
theory  of  universal  equable  climates.  Some  of  them  are  found 


68  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

right  in  the  midst  of  periods  thought  to  have  been  especially 
warm,  such  as  the  Carboniferous. 

Coleman  presents  other  geological  evidence  against  the 
theory.  The  fact  that  most  of  the  fossils  found  are  those  of 
warm-climate  creatures  is,  he  thinks,  misleading.  Plants  and 
animals  are  more  easily  fossilized  in  warm,  moist  climates 
than  they  are  in  cold,  arid  ones.  Fossilization,  even  under  the 
most  favorable  conditions,  is  a  rare  accident.  The  fauna  and 
flora  of  the  temperate  and  arctic  zones  of  the  past  were  sel- 
dom preserved  (87:252).  Thus,  while  the  finding  of  fossils  of 
warm-climate  organisms  all  over  the  earth  is  an  argument 
against  the  permanence  of  the  present  arrangement  of  the 
climatic  zones,  it  is  not  an  argument  for  universal  mild 
climates. 

Another  argument  against  such  climates  may  be  based 
upon  the  evidences  of  desert  conditions  in  all  geological 
periods.  These  imply  world-wide  variations  in  climate  and 
humidity.  Both  Brooks  (52:24-25,  172)  and  Umbgrove  (430: 
265)  stress  the  importance  of  this  evidence.  One  of  the  most 
famous  formations  of  Britain—the  Old  Red  Sandstone— is, 
apparently,  nothing  but  a  fossil  desert.  Coleman  points  to 
innumerable  varved  deposits  in  many  geological  periods  as 
evidence  of  seasonal  changes  (87:253),  which,  of  course,  imply 
the  existence  of  climatic  zones. 

Ample  evidence  of  the  existence  of  strongly  demarcated 
climatic  zones  through  the  earth's  whole  history  (at  least  since 
the  beginning  of  the  deposition  of  the  sedimentary  rocks) 
comes  from  other  sources.  Barghoorn  cites  the  evidence  of 
fragments  of  fossil  woods  from  late  Paleozoic  deposits  in  the 
Southern  Hemisphere  that  show  pronounced  ring  growth, 
indicating  seasons;  he  also  points  out  that  in  the  Permo-Car- 
boniferous  Period  floras  existed  that  were  adapted  to  very 
cold  climate  (375:242).  Colbert  himself  reports  good  evidence 
of  seasons  in  the  Cretaceous  Period,  in  the  form  of  fossils  of 
deciduous  trees  (375:265). 

Umbgrove  cites  the  geologist  Berry,  who  states  that  the 
fossilized  woods  from  six  geological  periods,  from  the  Devo- 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  69 

nian  to  the  Eocene,  show  well-marked  annual  rings,  indicat- 
ing seasons  like  those  of  the  present  time^  Furthermore,  Berry 
goes  on  to  say: 

Detailed  comparisons  of  these  Arctic  floras  with  contemporary  floras 
from  lower  latitudes  .  .  .  show  unmistakable  evidence  for  the  exist- 
ence of  climatic  zones  .  .  .  (430:266). 

Brooks  concludes,  on  the  basis  of  Berry's  evidence,  that  cli- 
matic zones  existed  in  the  Eocene  (52:24).  Ralph  W.  Chancy, 
after  a  study  of  the  fossil  floras  of  the  Tertiary  Period  (from 
the  Eocene  to  the  Pliocene),  concluded  that  climatic  zones 
existed  (72:475)  during  that  whole  period.  The  distinguished 
meteorologist  W.  J.  Humphreys,  whose  fundamental  work, 
The  Physics  of  the  Air,  remains  a  classic,  remarked  in  1920 
that  there  was  no  good  evidence  of  the  absence  of  climatic 
zones  from  the  beginning  of  the  geological  record.  Finally, 
Dr.  C.  C.  Nikiforoff,  an  expert  on  soils  (both  contemporary 
and  fossil  soils),  has  stated  that  "In  all  geological  times  there 
were  cold  and  warm,  humid  and  dry  climates,  and  their  ex- 
tremes presumably  did  not  change  much  throughout  geo- 
logical history"  (375:191).  We  will  return,  below,  to  the 
significance  of  fossil  soils,  and  present  other  evidence  showing 
persistence  of  sharply  demarcated  climatic  zones  during  the 
earth's  history.  But  where,  at  this  point,  does  the  evidence 
leave  us? 

On  the  one  hand,  the  evidence  shows  that  the  plants  and 
animals  of  the  past  were  distributed  without  regard  to  the 
present  direction  of  the  climatic  zones.  I  have  been  unable  to 
do  more  than  suggest  the  immensity  of  the  body  of  evidence 
supporting  this  conclusion.  On  the  other  hand,  the  attempt 
to  deny  the  existence,  in  the  past,  of  sharply  demarcated  cli- 
matic zones  like  those  of  the  present  has  failed.  It  may  even 
be  said  to  have  failed  sensationally.  There  is  no  scrap  of  evi- 
dence for  it,  except  the  evidence  it  is  supposed  to  explain, 
while,  on  the  other  hand,  it  is  in  contradiction  both  with 
the  fundamentals  of  astronomy  and  the  preponderance  of 
geological  evidence. 


70  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

So  we  are  left  with  a  clear-cut  conclusion:  Climatic  zones 
have  always  existed  as  they  exist  today,  but  they  have  fol- 
lowed different  paths  on  the  face  of  the  earth.  If  changes  in 
the  position  of  the  axis  of  rotation  of  the  earth,  and  of  the 
earth  upon  its  axis,  are  equally  impossible,  and  if  the  drift 
of  continents  individually  is  rendered  extremely  improbable 
for  numerous  weighty  reasons,  then  we  are  forced  to  the  con- 
clusion that  the  surface  of  the  earth  must  often  have  been 
shifted  over  the  underlying  layers. 


4.  The  Eddington-Pauly  Suggestion 

Another  suggestion  for  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust,  to 
which  I  have  briefly  referred,  should  now  be  further  dis- 
cussed. Its  author,  Karl  A.  Pauly,  has  contributed  new  lines 
of  evidence  in  support  of  such  shifts.  He  has  based  his  dis- 
placement theory  on  Eddington's  suggestion  that  the  earth's 
crust  may  have  been  displaced  steadily  through  time  by  the 
effects  of  tidal  friction.  Eddington's  idea  has  serious  weak- 
nesses, but  the  evidence  for  displacements  presented  by  Pauly 
is  most  impressive. 

"  Pauly  suggests  that  a  study  of  the  elevations  above  sea  level 
of  the  terminal  moraines  of  mountain  glaciers  in  all  latitudes 
can  establish  a  correlation  of  elevation  with  latitude.  It  is 
true  that  many  factors  influence  the  distance  a  mountain 
glacier  may  extend  downward  toward  sea  level,  but  latitude 
is  one  of  them,  and  by  using  a  sufficient  number  of  cases  it  is 
possible  to  average  out  the  other  factors,  and  arrive  at  the 
average  elevation  of  mountain  glacier  moraines  above  sea 
level  for  each  few  degrees  of  latitude  from  the  equator  toward 
the  poles.  This  gives  us  a  curve  that  makes  it  possible  to  com- 
pare the  elevations  of  the  terminal  moraines  of  mountain 
glaciers  that  existed  during  the  Pleistocene  Period.  Pauly 
finds  that  these  moraines  do  not  agree  with  the  curve,  indi- 
cating unmistakably  a  displacement  of  the  earth's  crust  (342: 
89). 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  71 

Pauly  cites  another  impressive  line  of  evidence  in  support 
of  his  conclusions.  He  has  compared  the  locations  of  coal  de- 
posits of  several  geological  periods  (many  of  which  are  now 
in  polar  regions)  with  the  locations  of  icecaps  for  the  same 
periods.  He  lists  34  coal  deposits  regarded  as  of  Jurassic- 
Liassic  age  and  17  of  Triassic-Thaetic  age,  and  finds  that,  if 
it  is  assumed  that  the  centers  of  the  icecaps  of  that  time  were 
located  at  the  poles,  then  these  coal  deposits  would  have  been 
located  within  or  just  outside  the  tropics,  as  would  be  correct 
He  says: 

The  very  definite  location  of  these  coal  deposits  within  the  Tria- 
Jura  tropical  and  subtropical  zones  cannot  be  mere  coincidence.  The 
distribution  indicates  the  lithosphere  has  shifted  (342:96). 

Of  the  Permo-Carboniferous  coal  deposits,  which,  he 
points  out,  are  very  widely  distributed  over  the  earth,  he 
says  that  "95  out  of  105  listed  in  The  Coal  Resources  of  the 
World  lie  within  or  just  outside  of  the  tropics  as  determined 
by  the  assumption  that  the  North  or  South  Pole  lay  under  the 
center  of  one  of  the  Permo-Carboniferous  ice  sheets"  (342: 

97)- 


5.  The  Contribution  of  George  W.  Bain 

Not  long  ago  Professor  George  W.  Bain,  of  Amherst,  in  an 
article  in  the  Yale  Scientific  Magazine  (18),  went  considerably 
beyond  the  categories  of  evidence  that  we  have  so  far  con- 
sidered. He  discussed  the  specific  chemical  processes  con- 
trolled by  sunlight  and  varying  according  to  latitude,  and  the 
remanent  chemicals  typical  of  soils  developed  in  the  different 
climatic  zones.  He  extended  this  sort  of  analysis  also  to 
marine  sediments. 

Bain's  approach  to  the  problem  of  evidence  of  climatic 
change  has  many  advantages.  It  avoids,  for  one  thing,  the  ob- 
jection that  has  been  raised  against  some  of  the  plant  evi- 
dence: that  plants  of  the  past  may  have  been  adjusted  to 


72  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

climates  different  from  those  in  which  their  modern  descend- 
ants live.  I  believe  his  method  establishes  beyond  question 
the  existence  of  climatic  zones  all  through  the  geologic  past. 

Dr.  Bain  begins  with  a  precise  definition  of  each  climatic 
zone  in  terms  of  the  quantities  of  the  sun's  heat  reaching  the 
earth's  surface.  He  points  out  that,  as  is  known,  the  seasonal 
variation  of  this  heat  increases  with  distance  from  the  equator 
(18:16).  He  then  describes  the  global  wind  pattern  resulting 
from  this  distribution  of  the  sun's  energy,  defining  clearly 
the  conditions  of  the  horse  latitudes,  in  which  most  of  the 
earth's  deserts  are  found,  and  the  meteorology  of  the  polar 
fronts.  He  shows  that  there  are  distinct  and  different  com- 
plete chemical  cycles  in  each  of  these  areas,  and  correspond- 
ing cycles  in  the  sea.  Many  of  the  chemical  compounds  pro- 
duced in  each  of  these  areas  are  included,  naturally,  in  the 
rocks  formed  from  the  sediments,  and  they  remain  as  perma- 
nent climatic  records. 

It  is  impossible,  because  of  limitations  of  space,  to  do  jus- 
tice to  Dr.  Bain's  comprehensive  approach  to  this  question. 
There  appears  to  be  no  room  for  doubt,  however,  that  great 
differences  exist  between  the  mineral  components  of  the 
different  climatic  zones,  as  determined  by  the  amount  of  the 
sun's  radiant  heat.  With  regard  to  the  polar  soils,  in  addition, 
it  is  noteworthy  that  they  are  developed  in  circles  on  the 
earth's  surface,  rather  than  in  bands.  Temperate  and  tropical 
soils  are,  of  course,  found  in  bands,  since  the  zones  are  bands 
that  encircle  the  earth. 

It  will  be  clear  to  the  reader  that  Dr.  Bain  has  established 
a  sound  method  for  the  study  of  the  climates  of  the  past.  He 
has  applied  his  method  to  the  study  of  the  climates  of  two 
periods,  the  Jurassic-Cretaceous  and  the  Carboniferous-Per- 
mian, with  very  significant  results.  He  has  concluded,  first, 
that  climatic  zones,  representing  the  different  distributions  of 
solar  heat,  existed  in  those  periods  just  as  at  present.  This  is 
proved  by  the  specific  remanent  chemicals  included  in  these 
rocks,  which  differ  exactly  as  do  the  sediments  of  the  different 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  73 

zones  at  the  present  time.  This  is,  of  course,  fatal  for  the 
theory  of  universal  equable  climates. 

His  second  conclusion,  of  even  greater  importance,  is  that 
the  directions  of  the  climatic  zones  have  changed  enormously 
in  the  course  of  time.  He  finds  the  equator  running  through 
the  New  Siberian  Islands  (in  the  Arctic  Ocean)  in  the  Permo- 
Carboniferous  Period,  and  North  and  South  America  lying 
tandem  along  it  (18:17).  The  evidence  he  uses  seems  to 
establish  his  essential  point  (and  ours)  that  the  climatic  zones 
themselves  have  shifted  their  positions  on  the  face  of  the 
earth. 

Dr.  Bain  has  drawn  some  interesting  further  conclusions. 
He  states  that  the  earth's  crust  must  have  been  displaced  over 
the  interior  layers,  and  that  "fixity  of  the  axis  of  the  earth 
relative  to  the  elastic  outer  shell  just  is  not  valid.  .  .  ."  (18: 
46).  He  points  to  the  fossil  evidence  of  the  cold  zones  (dis- 
tributed in  circular  areas)  and  says,  ".  .  .  The  recurrent 
change  in  position  of  these  rings  through  geologic  time  can 
be  accounted  for  now  only  on  the  basis  of  change  in  the  posi- 
tion of  the  elastic  shell  of  the  earth  relatively  to  its  axis  of 
rotation"  (18:46). 


6.  The  Contribution  of  T.  Y.  H.  Ma 

Dr.  Bain  pointed  out,  in  the  paper  above  mentioned,  that 
among  other  indications  of  latitude,  sea  crustaceans  and 
corals  may  indicate  latitude  either  by  the  presence  or  absence 
of  evidence  of  seasonal  variations  in  growth.  It  happens  that 
corals  have  been  very  thoroughly  investigated  from  precisely 
this  point  of  view. 

By  a  remarkable  parallelism  of  development,  another  the- 
ory of  displacement  of  the  earth's  crust  took  shape  on  the 
opposite  side  of  the  earth  at  about  the  same  time  that  Mr. 
Campbell  and  I  started  on  our  project.  Professor  Ting  Ying 
H.  Ma,  an  oceanographer,  then  at  the  University  of  Fukien, 
China,  came  to  the  conclusion,  after  many  years  of  study  of 


74  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

fossil  corals,  that  many  total  displacements  of  the  earth's 
whole  outer  mantle  must  have  taken  place.  I  did  not  become 
aware  of  Professor  Ma's  work  until  I  was  introduced  to  it  by 
Dr.  David  Ericson,  of  the  Lament  Geological  Observatory,  in 
1954.  Dr.  Ericson  has,  in  fact,  taken  a  leading  role  in  intro- 
ducing Professor  Ma's  work  to  American  scientists. 

For  about  twenty  years  previous  to  the  time  I  mention, 
Professor  Ma  had  intensively  pursued  the  study  of  living 
and  fossil  reef  corals.  He  very  early  noticed  that  characteristic 
of  reef  corals  referred  to  by  Dr.  Bain,  but  hitherto  ignored 
by  writers  on  corals.  He  saw  that,  at  distances  from  the 
equator,  there  were  seasonal  differences  in  the  rates  of  coral 
growth,  and  that  the  evidences  of  these  were  preserved  in  the 
coral  skeleton.  Specifically,  he  observed  that  in  winter  the 
coral  cells  are  smaller  and  denser;  in  summer  they  are  larger 
and  more  porous.  Together,  these  two  rings  make  up  the 
growth  for  one  year. 

Studying  living  coral  reefs  in  various  parts  of  the  Pacific, 
comparing,  measuring,  and  tabulating  coral  specimens  of 
innumerable  species,  making  photographic  studies  of  the 
coral  skeletons,  Professor  Ma  established  that  the  rates  of 
total  annual  coral  growth  for  identical  or  similar  species 
within  the  range  of  the  coralline  seas  increased  with  prox- 
imity to  the  equator,  and  that  seasonal  variation  in  growth 
rates  increased  with  distance  from  the  equator. 

Other  writers  on  corals  have  pointed  out  that  there  are 
numerous  individual  exceptions  and  irregularities  in  coral 
growth  rates,  deriving  from  the  fact  that  the  coral  polyps  feed 
upon  floating  food,  which  may  vary  in  quantity  from  place 
to  place,  from  day  to  day,  and  even  from  hour  to  hour  (125: 
20-21;  298:52-53).  Professor  Ma,  however,  has  guarded  him- 
self against  error  by  a  quantitative  and  statistical  approach. 
In  several  published  volumes  of  coral  studies  (285-290)  he 
has  compiled  tables  running  into  hundreds  of  pages,  and  his 
studies  have  involved  thousands  of  measurements. 

When  this  indefatigable  oceanographer  had  worked  out 
these  relations  of  growth  with  latitude,  he  possessed  an  effeo 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  75 

tive  tool  with  which  to  investigate  the  climates  of  the  past.  It 
was  possible  now  to  arrive  at  a  very  good  idea  of  the  condi- 
tions under  which  fossil  corals  grew.  Professor  Ma  studied 
hundreds  of  specimens  of  fossil  corals  from  many  of  the  geo- 
logical periods.  He  devoted  entire  separate  volumes  to  each 
of  the  Ordovician,  Silurian,  Devonian,  Cretaceous,  and  Ter- 
tiary Periods  (285-289). 

As  Ma  assembled  the  coral  data  for  past  periods,  it  became 
plain  to  him  that  the  total  width  of  the  coralline  seas  had 
never  varied  noticeably  from  the  beginning  of  the  geological 
record.  Not  only  was  the  existence  of  seasons,  of  climatic 
zones,  in  the  oldest  geological  periods  clearly  indicated;  it 
was  also  indicated  that  the  average  temperatures  of  the  re- 
spective zones  were  about  the  same  as  at  present. 

The  second  result  of  Ma's  studies  was  to  establish  that  the 
positions  of  the  ancient  coralline  seas  and,  therefore,  of  the 
ancient  equators  were  not  the  same  as  at  present.  They 
changed  from  one  geological  period  to  another.  Ma  first  came 
to  the  conclusion  that  this  could  be  explained  only  by  the 
theory  of  drifting  continents.  Down  to  about  1949  he  sought 
to  fit  the  evidence  into  that  theory.  By  1949,  however,  the 
continuing  accumulation  of  the  evidence  led  him  to  adopt 
the  theory  of  total  displacements  of  all  the  outer  shells  of  the 
earth  over  the  liquid  core.  By  some  instinct  of  conservatism, 
however,  he  did  not  abandon  the  theory  of  floating  conti- 
nents, but  combined  it  with  the  new  theory. 

Ma's  coralline  seas  ran  in  all  directions;  one  of  his  equators 
actually  bisected  the  Arctic  Ocean.  But  he  had  great  diffi- 
culty in  matching  up  his  equators  on  different  continents. 
If,  for  example,  he  traced  an  equator  across  North  America, 
he  could  not  match  it  with  an  equator  for  the  same  period 
on  the  other  side  of  the  earth,  to  make  a  complete  circle  of 
the  earth.  He  therefore  supposed  that  the  continents  them- 
selves had  been  shifting  independently,  and  this  had  had  the 
effect  of  throwing  the  ancient  equators  out  of  line.  He  there- 
fore allowed,  for  each  period,  enough  continental  drift  to 
bring  the  equators  into  line,  and  it  seemed,  when  he  did 


76  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

this,  that  in  successive  geological  periods  he  did  have  increas- 
ing distances  between  the  continents,  as  if  the  drift  had  been 
continuous. 

Subsequently,  Professor  Ma  developed  his  theory  into  a 
complete  system,  which  is  most  interesting,  and  yet  to  which, 
I  think,  serious  objections  may  be  raised. 

Corals  are,  according  to  Ma,  excellent  indicators  of  the 
climate  for  the  time  in  which  they  grew,  but,  by  the  nature 
of  the  case,  since  corals  grow  only  in  shallow  water,  and  grow 
upwards  only  as  far  as  the  surface,  the  period  of  time  repre- 
sented by  a  single  fossil  coral  reef  is  of  the  order  of  a  few 
thousand  years  only,  as  compared  with  the  millions  of  years 
embraced  by  a  geological  period. 

How  short  the  continuous  growth  of  a  coral  reef  may  be 
is  indicated  by  numerous  studies  of  the  coral  reefs  of  the 
Pacific.  A.  G.  Mayor,  for  example,  says: 

.  .  .  The  modern  reefs  now  constituting  the  atolls  and  barriers  of 
the  Pacific  could  readily  have  grown  upward  to  sea-level  from  the 
floors  of  submerged  platforms  since  the  close  of  the  last  glacial  epoch 


At  Pago  Pago  Harbor  borings  were  made  down  to  the 
basalt  underlying  the  reef,  and  after  estimates  of  the  growth 
rate  were  arrived  at,  the  age  of  the  reef  (Utelei)  was  esti- 
mated at  5,000  years.  When  these  spans  are  compared  with 
those  of  entire  geological  periods  of  the  order  of  20,000,000 
or  30,000,000  years,  it  is  clear  how  fragile  must  be  any  con- 
clusions based  on  the  assumption  that  a  given  coral  reef  in 
Europe  was  contemporary  with  another  one  in  North  Amer- 
ica. It  is  quite  impossible  in  the  present  state  of  our  knowl- 
edge to  decide  that  they  were  in  fact  contemporary. 

This  means  that  Ma's  corals  for  a  period  like  the  Devonian 
may  be  indications  of  different  equators  that  existed  at  differ- 
ent times  during  that  period  of  40,000,000  years.  Therefore 
it  is  obvious  that  thousands  of  coral  specimens  would  be  re- 
quired to  give  any  certainty  as  to  the  actual  climatic  history 
of  an  entire  geological  period. 


ANCIENT    CLIMATES  77 

Very  possibly  Ma  could  have  avoided  combining  the  two 
different  theories— the  slipping  of  the  shell  of  the  earth  and 
the  drifting  of  continents— if  he  had  supposed  a  sufficiently 
frequent  slipping  of  the  crust.  The  frequency  of  the  displace- 
ments suggested  by  the  theory  presented  in  this  book,  which 
would  involve  many  different  equators  in  a  single  geological 
period,  would  remove  his  difficulties.  As  it  is,  he  has  to  face 
all  the  geophysical  and  geological  objections  to  the  drifting 
continent  theory,  as  well  as  difficulties  with  his  displacement 
theory. 


7.  On  the  Rate  of  Climatic  Change 

Studies  appear  from  time  to  time  in  which  attempts  are  made 
to  trace  climatic  changes  in  specified  areas  over  periods  of 
millions  of  years.  In  one  of  these,  for  example  (72),  the  con- 
clusion is  reached  that  there  was  a  gradual  cooling  of  the 
climate  during  a  great  many  million  years  of  the  Tertiary 
Period.  It  is  true  that  no  cause  of  such  a  progressive  cooling 
can  be  pointed  to;  neither  is  there  any  explanation  as  to  why 
the  climatic  change  had  to  be  so  gradual.  It  is  simply  assumed 
that  the  climatic  change  had  to  be  gradual,  and  that  the  cause 
of  the  change  had  to  be  such  as  to  explain  imperceptible 
climatic  changes  over  millions  of  years  of  time. 

It  is  important  to  define  as  clearly  as  possible  the  nature 
of  the  evidence  on  which  these  conclusions  are  based.  In  the 
example  I  am  considering,  the  following  facts  have  decisive 
importance: 

a.  The  period  of  time  involved  in  an  alleged  cooling  of 
the  climate  is  of  the  order  of  30,000,000  years. 

b.  Wherever  reference  is  made  to  the  specific  strata  of  rock 
selected  for  analysis  of  the  climatic  evidence  (consisting 
of  included  fossils),  it  is  clear  that  the  time  required  for 
the  deposition  of  a  particular  layer  was  of  the  order  of 
10,000  years. 


78  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

c.  It  follows  that  during  30,000,000  years  it  would  be  pos- 
sible to  have  about  3,000  different  layers  of  sedimentary 
rock. 

d.  A  vast  majority  of  these  layers  cannot  be  sampled,  either 
because  they  no  longer  exist,  or  because  they  do  not 
contain  fossils,  or  simply  because  of  the  amount  of  work 
involved. 

e.  As  a  result,  only  the  most  unsatisfactory  kind  of  spot 
checking  is  possible.  Perhaps  a  dozen  strata  out  of  3,000 
may  be  studied,  and  from  these  it  must  be  obvious  that 
no  dependable  climatic  record  can  be  established. 

f.  Even  with  the  unsatisfactory  spot  checking  so  far  at- 
tempted, reversals  of  climatic  trends  have  been  ob- 
served (72). 

g.  Climatic  conditions  indicated  by  a  layer  of  sediments 
deposited  during  a  brief  period  of  time  in  one  location 
cannot  be  assumed  to  indicate  the  direction  of  climatic 
change  over  a  great  region,  or  over  the  whole  earth.  It 
seems  quite  as  reasonable  to  suppose  that  climatic 
change  in  other  regions  at  the  same  time  was  in  a  differ- 
ent direction.  Furthermore,  it  cannot  be  assumed  that 
two  sedimentary  deposits  in  different  areas  are  of  the 
same  age  because  they  both  indicate  climatic  change  in 
the  same  direction. 

It  must  be  concluded  that  all  claims  for  gradual  climatic 
changes  in  the  same  direction  over  long  periods  of  time  and 
over  great  areas  are  unsupported  by  convincing  evidence. 
The  existence  of  such  long-term  trends  can  be  supported 
by  no  reasonable  hypothesis.  We  are  left  with  the  conclusion 
that  climatic  change  has  probably  taken  place  within  rela- 
tively short  periods  of  time,  and  possibly  in  opposite  direc- 
tions for  different  areas  at  the  same  time,  as,  indeed,  would 
be  a  natural  consequence  of  displacements  of  the  earth's 
crust. 


IV  :  THE  MOUNTAINS 


PART  I.  The  Folding  and  Fracturing  of  the  Crust 

By  far  the  most  magnificent  features  of  the  earth's  crust  are 
the  lofty  mountain  ranges  that  are  found  on  all  the  conti- 
nents, exciting  the  wonder  of  man,  and  those  other,  equally 
tremendous  mountain  ranges  that  lie  drowned  in  the  silent 
depths  of  the  sea.  These  mountain  ranges  carry  in  their  in- 
tricate formations  much  of  the  history  of  the  earth's  crust.  If 
we  could  know  the  forces  that  produced  them,  we  could  grasp 
the  basic  dynamic  principles  of  the  earth's  development.  Un- 
fortunately, though  the  mountains  have  long  been  the  sub- 
ject of  intensive  scientific  investigation,  they  have  preserved 
their  secrets  well.  The  most  important  of  these  secrets  is  the 
secret  of  their  birth.  What  forces  within  the  earth  were  re- 
sponsible for  their  formation?  As  of  now,  we  do  not  know. 

Nothing  could  better  betray  the  extent  of  our  ignorance 
of  the  dynamic  processes  that  have  shaped  the  face  of  the 
earth  than  this  confession  of  ignorance.  Yet,  it  is  agreed  by 
geologists  that  no  theory  has  so  far  satisfactorily  explained 
mountain  building.  Daly,  for  example,  has  referred  to  the 
process  of  the  folding  of  the  rock  strata,  a  phase  of  mountain 
building,  as  "an  utterly  mysterious  process"  (7od:4i).  Guten- 
berg has  concluded  that  none  of  the  present  theories  will  do. 
He  remarks  that  "all  the  forces  discussed  so  far  seem  to  be 
insufficient  to  produce  the  formation  of  mountains"  (194: 
171),  and  this  includes,  of  course,  the  long-exploded  (but  still 
widely  current)  theory  that  ascribes  mountains  to  the  cooling 
and  shrinking  of  the  earth.  As  to  this,  Gutenberg  remarks, 
".  .  .  other  scientists  have  pointed  out  that  the  cooling  of 
the  earth  is  not  sufficient  to  produce  the  major  part  of  the 
crumpling,  especially  since  investigations  of  the  radioactive 
heat  which  is  produced  inside  the  earth  have  indicated  that 


8o  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

the  cooling  of  the  earth  is  less  than  it  had  been  originally  be- 
lieved. .  .  ."  (194:192).  Bullard,  reviewing  the  third  edition 
of  Harold  Jeffreys's  basic  work,  The  Earth,  notes  the  absence 
of  progress  toward  solving  the  problem  of  mountain  build- 
ing, since  the  second  edition  twenty-five  years  ago  (59). 
Pirsson  and  Schuchert,  the  authors  of  a  general  text  on  geol- 
ogy, conclude  a  section  on  the  cause  of  mountain  building 
with  the  statement:  "It  must  be  admitted,  therefore,  that  the 
cause  of  compressive  deformation  in  the  earth's  crust  is  one 
of  the  great  mysteries  of  science,  and  can  be  discussed  only  in 
a  speculative  way"  (345:404). 

What  is  the  nature  of  this  problem  that  has  so  far  baffled 
science? 


/.  The  Problem  of  Crustal  Folding 

It  is  important  to  take  into  account  the  fact  that  there  are  sev- 
eral different  kinds  of  mountains,  and  that  their  origins  may 
be  ascribed  to  somewhat  different  circumstances,  even  though 
(as  we  shall  see)  they  may  be  related  to  one  underlying  cause. 
Some  mountains  are  caused  by  volcanic  eruptions.  These  con- 
sist of  piles  of  volcanic  matter.  Some  of  the  greatest  moun- 
tains on  the  earth's  surface  are  volcanic  mountains.  Many 
of  them  are  found  on  ocean  bottoms,  and  when  they  rise  to 
the  surface  they  form  the  island  chains  (such  as  the  Hawai- 
ians)  that  are  especially  numerous  in  the  Pacific.  Sometimes 
volcanic  islands  or  mountains  can  be  formed  quickly,  as  was 
the  case  recently  in  Mexico,  where  a  large  mountain, 
Paricutfn,  was  developed  in  a  few  years  to  a  height  of  several 
thousand  feet  from  a  lava  flow  that  started  in  a  cornfield  on 
the  level  ground.  Some  mountains  result  from  a  vast  flow  of 
molten  rock  that  gathers  under  the  crust  at  one  spot  and 
domes  it  up.  The  causes  of  these  events  are  unknown. 

Many  mountains,  and  even  whole  ranges  of  mountains,  are 
brought  into  existence  in  part  by  the  cracking  of  the  earth's 
crust,  accompanied  by  the  tilting  of  the  separated  blocks.  The 


THE    MOUNTAINS  8l 

Sierra  Nevada  Mountains  of  California  appear  to  have  been 
formed  in  this  way.  According  to  Daly,  they  represent  the 
tilting  of  a  single  block  of  the  earth's  crust  some  600  miles 
long  (98:90).  Some  folding  of  the  crust,  however,  had  previ- 
ously taken  place.  Many  great  chasms,  extended  cliff  forma- 
tions, and  rift  valleys  appear  to  have  been  formed  by  the 
cracking  and  drawing  apart  of  the  crust,  and  by  the  elevation 
or  subsidence  of  the  different  sides.  The  great  African  Rift 
Valley  is  perhaps  the  best-known  example  of  this  sort  of 
formation;  the  rift  of  which  it  is  a  part,  as  we  shall  see  below, 
has  recently  been  connected  with  a  world-wide  system  of 
great  submarine  rifts.  The  cause  of  all  this  cracking  and 
tilting  is  still  one  of  the  mysteries  of  science. 

The  greatest  mountain  systems  on  the  earth's  surface  have 
been  formed  as  the  result  of  the  lateral  compression  and  fold- 
ing of  the  crust.  Since  folding  is  the  cause  of  most  mountain 
building  it  must  hold  our  particular  attention.  As  already 
suggested,  science  is  particularly  at  a  loss  to  explain  the  fold- 
ing. A  number  of  suggestions  have  been  advanced,  but  they 
are  all  deficient  for  various  reasons. 

A  part  of  the  public  is  under  the  impression  that  moun- 
tains have  been  formed  by  the  action  of  running  water,  wear- 
ing away  the  stone,  eroding  the  tablelands,  and  depositing 
layers  of  sediment  in  the  valleys  and  in  the  sea.  Although  it 
cannot  be  denied  that  erosion  has  been  a  powerful  factor  in 
shaping  many  mountains,  and  may  have  been  the  main  factor 
in  shaping  some  of  them  (for  example,  Mt.  Monadnock,  in 
New  Hampshire,  which  I  can  see  from  my  window  as  I  write 
these  words),  it  cannot  have  been  the  principal  cause  of  the 
formation  of  our  great  folded  mountain  ranges. 

Geologists  who  have  argued  in  favor  of  this  theory  have 
pointed  out  that  the  deposition  of  sediment  in  narrow  crustal 
depressions  may  have  been  a  cause  of  the  folding  of  the  crust. 
The  folding  could  have  resulted  in  part  from  the  sinking  of  the 
valley  bottoms  under  the  weight  of  the  sediments.  The  proc- 
ess will  be  found  described  in  detail  in  almost  any  textbook 
of  geology.  There  are  serious  objections  to  it,  and  no  geol- 


82  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

ogist  today  considers  it  a  satisfactory  explanation.  One  ob- 
jection is  that  this  process  of  folding  is  essentially  locaL  It 
cannot  explain  the  greatest  mountain  systems,  spme  of  which 
virtually  span  the  globe.  It  cannot  explain,  for  example,  the 
almost  continuous  line  of  mountain  ranges  that  includes  the 
Rockies,  the  Andes,  and  the  Antarctic  Mountains,  and  which 
extends  for  a  total  distance  of  almost  half  the  circumference 
of  the  earth.  Neither  can  this  theory  explain  the  numerous 
submarine  mountain  ranges  that  have,  in  recent  years,  been 
discovered  on  the  bottoms  of  the  Atlantic,  Pacific,  and  Arctic 
Oceans.  Moreover,  it  has  been  pointed  out  that  in  many  cases 
folding  of  the  crust  has  taken  place  without  any  deposition  of 
sediment,  and  therefore  must  have  been  due  to  other  causes. 
The  geologist  Henry  Fielding  Reid  remarked: 

.  .  .  There  are  many  deeps  in  the  ocean,  such  as  the  Virgin  Islands 
Deep,  the  Tonga  Deep,  and  others,  which  appear  to  have  sunk  with- 
out any  material  deposit  of  sediments.  .  .  .  (354). 

For  these  various  reasons,  then,  geologists  have  come  to  the 
conclusion  that  erosion  is  only  a  secondary  cause  of  mountain 
building  (345:382-84).  We  shall  consider  this  again. 

Another  common  impression,  as  already  mentioned,  is  that 
mountain  formation  has  been  due  to  the  cooling  and  shrink- 
ing of  the  earth.  It  was  reasonable,  perhaps,  as  long  as  the 
theory  of  the  cooling  of  the  earth  was  unquestioned,  to  try 
to  explain  the  origin  of  folded  mountains  in  this  way,  for,  of 
course,  if  the  earth  shrank  in  size,  even  only  slightly,  as  a  re- 
sult of  cooling,  some  wrinkling  of  the  crust  must  be  the 
result.  The  fact  that  the  pattern  of  wrinkles  that  would  be 
produced  in  this  way  (and  which  could  be  deduced  fairly 
clearly)  bore  no  resemblance  whatever  to  the  patterns  of  the 
existing  mountain  ranges,  did  not  greatly  diminish  the  cur- 
rency of  this  theory,  though  it  did  bring  about  a  devastating 
attack  upon  it  by  one  competent  geologist  whose  views  we 
shall  discuss  below. 

We  have  seen  that  there  is  now  an  impressive  body  of  evi- 
dence and  opinion  against  the  theory  of  a  molten  origin  for 


THE    MOUNTAINS  8j 

the  earth.  The  doubts  that  have  gathered  about  this  assump- 
tion are  sufficiently  serious  to  prevent  us  from  basing  any 
theory  of  mountain  building  upon  it  (for  no  theory  can 
have  greater  probability  than  its  own  basic  assumptions).  But 
even  if  this  were  not  the  case,  even  if  the  molten  origin  of  the 
earth  were  a  demonstrated  fact,  still,  it  was  pointed  out 
twenty-five  years  ago,  by  Clarence  Button,  that  the  shrinking 
of  the  globe  would  not  explain  the  folded  mountains.  Button 
had  two  objections.  First,  he  said  that  the  calculated  amount 
of  the  shrinkage  that  could  have  occurred  since  the  crust  was 
formed,  by  the  reduction  of  temperatures,  would  not  account 
for  the  volume  of  the  mountains  known  to  have  existed  dur- 
ing geological  history.  Secondly,  he  pointed  out  that  the 
kinds  of  pressures  that  would  exist  in  the  crust  as  a  result  of 
the  shrinking  of  the  earth  could  not  produce  mountain 
ranges  of  the  existing  patterns.  On  this  point,  he  said: 

...  As  regards  the  second  objection,  which,  if  possible,  is  more 
cogent  still,  it  may  be  remarked  that  the  most  striking  features  in  the 
facts  to  be  explained  are  the  long  narrow  tracts  occupied  by  the  belts 
of  plicated  strata,  and  the  approximate  parallelism  of  their  folds. 
These  call  for  the  action  of  some  great  horizontal  force  thrusting  in 
one  direction.  Take,  for  example,  the  Appalachian  system,  stretching 
from  Maine  to  Georgia.  Here  is  a  great  belt  of  parallel  synclinals  and 
anticlinals  with  a  persistent  trend,  and  no  rational  inquirer  can  doubt 
that  they  have  been  puckered  up  by  some  vast  force  acting  hori- 
zontally in  a  northwest  and  southeast  direction.  Doubtless  it  is  the 
most  wonderful  example  of  systematic  plication  in  the  world.  But 
there  are  many  others  that  indicate  the  operation  of  the  same  forces 
with  the  same  broad  characteristics.  The  particular  characteristic  with 
which  we  are  concerned  is  that  in  each  of  these  folded  belts  the  hori- 
zontal force  has  acted  wholly  or  almost  wholly  in  one  direction.  But 
the  forces  that  would  arise  from  a  collapsing  crust  would  act  in  every 
direction  equally.  There  would  be  no  determinate  direction.  In  short, 
the  process  would  not  form  long  narrow  belts  of  parallel  folds.  As  I 
have  not  time  to  discuss  the  hypothesis  further,  I  dismiss  it  with  the 
remark  that  it  is  quantitatively  insufficient  and  qualitatively  inap- 
plicable. It  is  an  explanation  that  explains  nothing  that  we  want  to 
explain.  .  .  .  (122:201-02). 

It  is  indeed  astonishing  to  note  that  though  a  quarter  of  a 
century  has  passed  since  this  statement  was  made,  and  though 


84  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

leading  geophysicists  today  sustain  Button's  views  (194:192), 
the  impression  is  still  widespread,  and  not  merely  among  lay- 
men, that  mountains  are,  more  or  less,  understandable  as 
the  consequence  of  the  cooling  of  the  earth.  The  cause  of  this 
inertia  is,  very  likely,  the  absence  of  any  alternative,  accept- 
able theory  of  mountain  building. 

In  recent  years  many  geologists  have  agreed  with  Button 
that  the  mountains  were  folded  by  some  immense  force  oper- 
ating horizontally  on  the  earth's  crust.  Furthermore,  they 
have  come  to  recognize  that  the  force  or  forces  involved  in 
mountain  folding  acted  on  the  earth's  crust  as  a  whole  and 
at  the  same  time.  Thus,  one  of  our  leading  geophysicists,  Br. 
Walter  Bucher,  of  Columbia,  remarked: 

Taken  in  their  entirety,  the  orogenic  [mountainous]  belts  are  the 
result  of  world-wide  stresses  that  have  acted  on  the  crust  as  a  whole. 

Certainly  the  pattern  of  these  belts  is  not  what  one  would  expect 
from  wholly  independent,  purely  local  changes  in  the  crust  (58:144). 

The  same  thing  was  pointed  out  by  Br.  Umbgrove: 

.  .  .  But  the  growing  amount  of  stratigraphic  studies  make  it  in- 
creasingly evident  that  the  terrestrial  crust  was  subjected  to  a  period- 
ically alternating  increase  and  decrease  of  compression.  ...  I  feel 
there  is  overwhelming  evidence  that  the  movements  are  the  expression 
of  a  common,  world-wide,  active,  and  deep-seated  cause.  .  .  .  (430:31). 

Br.  Umbgrove  was  impressed  by  another  characteristic  of 
this  world-wide  force.  It  did  not  act  continuously.  It  was  not 
always  acting  to  expand  or  squeeze  sectors  of  the  crust  to  fold 
them  into  mountains.  It  acted  only  at  certain  times,  and 
then,  for  other  periods,  it  was  inactive.  There  was  a  sort  of 
periodicity  to  its  operation.  This  periodicity  extended  also 
to  other  aspects  of  the  earth's  geological  history: 

The  geologist  comes  across  periodicity  in  many  of  the  pages  which 
he  is  arduously  deciphering—in  the  sequence  of  the  strata,  for  in- 
stance, and  their  contents  of  former  organisms.  .  .  .  He  observes  it 
elsewhere,  in  the  deep-seated  forces  that  bring  subsidence  first  in  one 
area  and  then  in  another  ...  in  the  intrusion  of  liquid  melts  or 
"magma"  rising  from  some  deeper  part  of  the  earth's  interior;  in  the 


THE    MOUNTAINS  87 

ing.  Joly  attempted  to  prove  that  the  accumulation  of  radio- 
active heat  in  the  earth  resulted  in  mountain  building  at 
intervals  of  30,000,000  years  (244;  235:153).  Gutenberg,  how- 
ever, says  that  details  of  Joly's  theory  have  been  disproved 
(194:158)  and,  moreover,  that  the  theory  includes  no  mecha- 
nism to  account  for  the  3o,ooo,ooo-year  intervals  (194:188). 
It  is  impossible  to  see  that  the  resulting  upheaval  of  the 
surface  could  produce  mountain  ranges  of  the  patterns  that 
exist.  Joly's  theory  does  postulate  a  growing  earth,  but 
whether  the  crust  bursts  occasionally  or  is  continually  col- 
lapsing because  of  shrinking,  it  all  amounts  to  the  same 
thing:  neither  theory  meets  the  requirements.  Attempts  have 
also  been  made  to  explain  periodicity  as  the  result  of  long- 
range  astronomical  cycles,  but  they  have  been  unsuccessful 
(430:281-82).  It  is  obviously  difficult  to  explain  mountain 
building  by  astronomical  cycles. 

For  some  years,  geologists  have  been  looking  for  a  moun- 
tain-folding force  below  the  earth's  crust.  They  have  been 
investigating  the  possibility  of  the  existence  of  currents  in 
the  semiliquid  layers  under  the  crust,  and  speculating  on  the 
possible  effects  of  such  currents,  if  they  exist,  on  the  crust 
itself.  It  has  been  suggested  that  such  currents,  rising  under 
the  crust,  or  sinking,  might  fold  the  crust.  A  sinking  current, 
for  example,  would  have  the  effect  of  drawing  the  crust  to- 
gether over  it,  and  pulling  it  down,  forming  wrinkles,  in 
long  narrow  patterns,  like  the  mountain  ranges.  Calculations 
have  been  made  of  the  forces  that  could  be  brought  to  bear 
upon  the  crust  in  this  way.  Vening  Meinesz  prefers  this  way 
of  accounting  for  mountain  building: 

If  we  examine  the  pattern  of  great  geosynclines  over  the  earth's 
surface,  we  cannot  doubt  that  their  cause  must  have  a  world-wide 
character.  The  geology  in  these  belts  points  to  horizontal  compression 
in  the  crust,  at  least  during  the  later  stages  of  their  development.  The 
two  main  hypotheses  suggested  to  explain  these  great  phenomena  are 
(i)  the  thermal-contraction  hypothesis,  and  (2)  the  hypothesis  of  sub- 
crustal  current  systems  of  such  large  horizontal  dimensions  that,  ver- 
tically, they  must  involve  at  least  a  great  part  of  the  thickness  of  the 
mantle  and  probably  the  whole  mantle  (349:319). 


88  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

Vening  Meinesz  summarizes  the  arguments  against  the 
thermal-contraction  hypothesis  (the  cooling  of  the  earth), 
and  argues  for  the  second  theory.  It  is  interesting,  in  passing, 
to  note  that  one  of  his  arguments  against  the  contraction 
theory  is  that  "In  large  parts  of  the  earth's  surface  .  .  .  ten- 
sion seems  to  exist  in  the  crust  at  the  same  time  that  folding 
takes  place  elsewhere,  and  this  fact  is  difficult  to  reconcile 
with  thermal  contraction  (giving  compression)  throughout 
the  crust.  .  .  ."  (349:320).  He  is  here  saying  that  the  earth's 
crust  was  being  stretched  in  some  places  and  compressed  in 
others,  at  the  same  time,  which  is  inconsistent  with  the  cool- 
ing and  contracting  theory.  It  is,  however,  quite  consistent 
with  the  crust  displacement  hypothesis. 

Now,  as  to  the  subcrustal  current  hypothesis,  we  may  note 
that  Meinesz  is  assuming  currents  travelling  for  great  dis- 
tances horizontally,  and  moving  in  great  depths  of  hundreds 
of  miles  below  the  crust.  Naturally,  the  movement  of  such 
masses  of  rock  could  potentially  create  pressures  to  stagger 
the  imagination.  Gutenberg  discusses  the  work  of  many  men 
who  are  studying  subcrustal  currents  (194:186,  191).  The 
chief  weakness  of  the  theory  is  the  absence  of  any  real  evi- 
dence for  the  existence  of  such  currents.  It  is  suggested,  for 
example,  that  thermal  convection  might  account  for  them, 
or  chemical  changes  of  state  in  depth  might  account  for 
them,  or  mechanical  factors  might  be  at  work,  but,  mean- 
while, there  is  no  real  evidence  that  such  currents  really 
exist.  Some  geologists  have  claimed  to  have  found  evidence 
of  cyclonelike  patterns  in  rock  structures  (194:188),  but  these 
appear  to  have  been  of  small  magnitude;  they  therefore  may 
have  been  formed  in  small  pockets  of  molten  rock.  They  do 
not  provide  reliable  evidence  for  the  existence  of  gigantic 
crust-warping  currents,  such  as  would  be  required  for  moun- 
tain building. 

The  problem  that  we  are  involved  with  here  is  that  of  the 
origin  of  the  geosyncline.  Geologists  refer  to  a  downward  fold 
in  the  crust  of  major  proportions  as  a  geosyncline.  An  up- 
ward fold  (or  arch)  is  a  geoanticline.  They  are  sometimes 


THE    MOUNTAINS  91 

ments  and  possibly  through  a  number  of  successive  displace- 
ments of  the  crust,  to  the  formation  of  folded  mountain 
ranges. 

The  systematic  presentation  of  this  theory  requires  us  to 
consider  the  two  different  phases  of  displacement— equator- 
ward  and  poleward— separately,  for  they  have  very  different 
results.  We  will  begin  with  the  consideration  of  the  effects 
of  a  displacement  of  a  crustal  sector  toward  the  equator. 

In  a  shift  in  that  direction,  a  crustal  sector  is  submitted 
to  tension  (or  stretching),  and  this  tension  is  relieved  by  the 
fracturing  that  takes  place  when  the  bursting  stress  exerted 
on  the  crust  has  come  to  exceed  the  strength  of  the  crust.  (For 
Mr.  Campbell's  calculations  of  the  quantity  of  the  bursting 
stress,  as  compared  with  estimates  of  crustal  strength,  see 
Chapter  XI.)  Until  fractures  appear  and  multiply,  the  crust 
caijnot  move  over  the  bulge.  After  the  fracturing  permits 
the  movement  to  begin,  the  crustal  blocks  tend  to  draw 
slightly  apart.  The  spaces  between  them  are  immediately 
filled  by  molten  material  from  below. 

Let  us  form  a  clear  picture  of  this  crustal  stretching,  from 
the  quantitative  standpoint.  It  is  important  to  estimate  the 
stretch  per  mile,  if  we  are  to  visualize  the  results.  Taking  the 
globe  as  a  whole,  the  difference  between  the  polar  and  equa- 
torial diameters  is  about  26  miles.  The  circumferences, 
therefore,  differ  by  about  78  miles.  If  the  crust  were  dis- 
placed so  far  that  a  point  at  a  pole  was  displaced  to  the 
equator,  the  polar  circumference  would  have  to  stretch  78 
miles  to  fit  over  the  equator.  This  would  amount  to  about 
17  feet  in  the  mile.  Since  the  magnitude  of  displacements, 
however  (according  to  evidence  to  be  presented  later),  seems 
to  have  been  of  the  order  of  no  more  than  about  30  degrees, 
or  one  third  of  the  distance  from  pole  to  equator,  the  average 
stretch  per  mile  may  have  amounted  to  five  or  six  feet,  or 
one  foot  in  a  thousand. 

It  would  be  a  mistake  to  visualize  this  stretching  of  the 
crust  in  the  equatorward-moving  areas  as  evenly  distributed 
around  the  whole  circumference  of  the  globe.  Obviously,  the 


g2  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

real  events  would  not  correspond  to  this.  The  crust  would 
be  under  bursting  stress,  and  this  would  be  relieved  spas- 
modically, during  the  movement  of  the  crust,  by  fractures  at 
the  weakest  points.  A  fracture  through  the  crust  at  one  point 
would  relieve  the  stress  for  perhaps  hundreds  of  miles.  Since 
the  elasticity  of  the  crust  is  slight,  the  stretching  or  extension 
of  the  crust  would  consist  of  the  drawing  apart,  to  varying 
distances,  of  the  fractured  blocks.  Generally  speaking,  the 
fewer  the  fractures,  the  farther  their  sides  would  draw  apart. 
It  would  be  possible  that  the  total  amount  of  the  stretching 
of  the  earth's  circumference  would  be  concentrated  in  rela- 
tively few  critical  areas. 

It  must  also  be  kept  in  mind  that  some  parts  of  this  area 
being  displaced  toward  the  equator  will  be  displaced  farther 
than  others.  The  greatest  displacement  will  occur  along  the 
line,  or  meridian,  drawn  from  the  pole  through  the  center  of 
mass  of  the  icecap  and  so  around  the  earth;  or,  if  any  unex- 
pected factor  should  deflect  the  direction  of  the  movement, 
the  greatest  displacement  will  occur  along  whatever  meridian 
represents  the  direction  of  the  movement.  As  I  have  pointed 
out,  at  two  pivot  points  on  the  equator  90  degrees  away  from 
this  meridian  there  will  be  little  or  no  movement,  and  the 
points  in  between  will  move  proportionately  to  their  dis- 
tances from  the  meridian.  The  tension,  or  stretching,  will  be 
proportional  to  the  amount  of  displacement.  It  therefore  will 
be  greatest  along  the  central  meridian  of  movement,  and  it 
is  here  that  Mr.  Campbell  expects  the  first  major  fractures 
of  the  crust  to  develop. 

It  is  important  to  visualize  the  nature  of  the  crust  on  which 
this  tension  is  exerted.  The  crust  is  comparatively  rigid,  hav- 
ing little  elasticity,  but  it  is  not  strong.  It  varies  in  thickness 
and  strength  from  place  to  place.  As  we  shall  see,  it  is  even 
now  penetrated  by  great  systems  of  deep  fractures  of  unex- 
plained origin.  These  inequalities  of  strength  will  be  very 
important  in  determining  the  reactions  of  the  crust  from 
place  to  place  to  the  tension  exerted  upon  it;  they  will  de- 


THE     MOUNTAINS  93 

termine  the  precise  locations,  and  to  some  extent  the  pat- 
terns, of  the  fractures  that  will  result. 

Without  attempting  to  anticipate  a  more  detailed  discus- 
sion, to  be  introduced  later,  of  the  forces  involved  in  this 
fracturing  of  the  crust,  I  would  like  to  remark  that  the  forces 
required  for  the  fracturing  are  by  no  means  so  great  as  might 
be  at  first  supposed.  It  is  a  question  of  relatively  slight  forces 
exerted  over  considerable  periods  of  time. 

If  we  disregard  the  factors  that  may  locally  influence  the 
locations  and  sizes  of  fractures,  a  general  pattern  may  be  indi- 
cated to  which  they  will  tend  to  conform.  Mr.  Campbell  has 
worked  out  this  pattern  schematically,  and  has  indicated  it  in 
Figures  II,  III,  and  IV.  The  reader  will  note  that  the  fractures 
take  two  directions.  There  are  the  north-south,  or  meridional, 
fractures,  which  Mr.  Campbell  refers  to  as  the  major  frac- 
tures, and  then  there  are  minor  fractures  at  right  angles  to 
them. 

Mr.  Campbell  anticipates  that  numerous  major  fractures 
will  occur  parallel  to  each  other  as  the  crust  moves.  The  for- 
mation of  very  numerous  minor  faults  at  right  angles  to  the 
major  faults  will  form  a  gridiron  pattern  of  fractures.  Mr. 
Campbell  has  suggested  a  method  for  visualizing  the  process. 
If  the  reader  will  cup  his  hands  and  place  them  together, 
with  fingertips  touching  and  the  fingers  of  each  hand  close 
together  (as  if  they  lay  on  the  surface  of  a  sphere),  and  then 
imagine  the  sphere  growing,  and  causing  the  fingertips  of 
both  hands  to  spread  apart,  and  at  the  same  time  the  fingers 
of  each  hand  to  spread  apart,  he  may  visualize  the  process. 
The  gap  between  his  hands  will  now  represent  a  major  frac- 
ture, and  the  gaps  between  the  fingers  of  each  hand  will 
represent  the  minor  fractures  at  right  angles  to  it.  The  reader 
will  see,  a  little  later  on,  how  closely  this  projection  of  frac- 
ture effects  corresponds  to  the  real  phenomena  in  the  earth's 
crust. 

Another  important  aspect  of  these  fractures  is  shown  in 
Figure  III.  Mr.  Campbell  has  indicated  that,  owing  to  the 
changing  arc  of  the  surface  as  the  crustal  sector  moves 


94 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 


Fig.  II.  Mountain  Building:  Patterns  of  Fracture  and  Folding 
The  lithosphere,  or  crust,  is  represented  in  a  future  movement  resulting 
from  the  effect  of  the  present  icecap  in  Antarctica.  Since  the  latter' s 
center  of  mass  is  on  (or  near)  the  meridian  of  96°  E.  Long.,  the  crust  is 
represented  as  moving  in  that  direction  from  the  pole.  The  sector  of 
expansion  is  moving  equatorward  and  therefore  being  extended.  The 
sector  of  contraction  is  moving  toward  the  North  Pole  from  the  equator 
and  therefore  being  compressed. 

In  the  sector  of  expansion,  parallel  major  faults  can  be  observed,  with 
minor  faults  at  right  angles.  The  wavy  lines  suggest  the  effects  of  local 
differences  in  crustal  strength.  The  pattern  of  the  fractures  is  indicated, 
but  not  their  number;  a  very  large  number  of  meridional  fractures 
might  be  formed,  while  the  minor  fractures  would  be  even  more 
numerous. 

In  the  sector  of  contraction,  crustal  folding  is  shown  only  schemat- 
ically. It  is  represented  as  if  all  the  folding  is  taking  place  along  one 
meridian,  although  in  reality  there  would  probably  be  many  parallel 
zones  of  mountain  folding  at  considerable  distances  from  each  other. 
Campbell  indicates  that  this  movement  will  be  accompanied  by  frac- 
turing of  the  crust,  with  faults  running  at  right  angles  to  the  main  axes 
of  the  folds.  The  third  axis,  which  runs  through  the  equator,  is  consid- 
ered to  be  the  axis  on  which  the  crust  turns.  The  points  directly  at  the 
two  ends  of  this  axis  do  not  move. 


THE    MOUNTAINS 


95 


POSITION  OF 
UTH05PHERE 
IF  NOT  PUUEt> 
DOWN  BY  GRAVITY 


NORTH    POLE 


Fig.  III.  Vertical  View  of  the  Earth  with  Cross  Section  at  96°  E.  Long. 
This  figure  illustrates  a  number  of  simultaneous  effects  of  displacement. 
The  upper  right-hand  quadrant  shows  a  sector  of  the  crust  displaced 
toward  the  equator.  Here  the  lessening  arc  of  the  surface  will  cause 
faults  to  open  from  the  bottom.  The  lower  right-hand  quadrant  shows  a 
sector  of  the  crust  displaced  toward  a  pole.  Here  the  increasing  arc  of 
the  surface  results  in  faults  opening  from  the  top.  The  lower  left-hand 
quadrant,  which  is  a  vertical  view  of  a  sector  moving  equator-ward,  shows 
major  meridional  faults,  which  have  opened  from  the  bottom.  The 
upper  left-hand  quadrant,  which  is  a  vertical  view  of  a  sector  displaced 
poleward,  shows  meridional  faults  opening  from  the  top. 

The  reader  should  visualize  the  left-hand  quadrants  as  if  looking 
straight  down  on  the  earth  at  the  point  where  the  central  meridian  of 
displacement  (96°  £.  Long,  in  this  case)  crosses  the  equator. 

NOTE:  In  this  and  other  drawings  the  South  Pole  has  been  shown  at  the 
top,  reversing  the  usual  position.  This  has  been  done  for  reasons  of  con- 
venience and  because  our  theory  has  been  developed  with  the  Antarctic 
icecap  as  the  center  of  attention.  In  actuality,  there  is  no  such  thing  as 
"up"  or  "down"  in  space.  The  North  Pole  is  usually  shown  at  the  top, 
but  this  is  merely  a  convention  of  cartographers. 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 


CQUVTORtAt  - 


Fig.  IV.     Patterns  of  Fracture 

This  figure  indicates  schematically  the  mechanics  of  faulting  and  folding 
in  a  displacement  of  the  crust.  It  is  suggested,  for  purposes  of  illustra- 
tion only,  that  all  effects  are  concentrated  on  the  meridian  of  maximum 
crust  displacement.  Therefore,  only  one  major  meridional  fault  is  shown 
in  the  upper  hemisphere,  which  is  moving  toward  the  equator.  Dotted 
lines  indicate  other  faults  opening  from  the  bottom  of  the  lithosphere, 
or  crust,  as  the  arc  of  the  surface  diminishes. 

Across  the  equator,  where  the  surface  is  moving  toward  the  pole,  and 
compression  is  resulting,  the  continuation  of  the  major  expansion  fault 
is  shown  as  a  pressure  ridge,  which  may  later  become  the  main  axis  of 
a  mountain  range.  Again,  for  purposes  of  illustration  only,  it  is  assumed 
that  all  folding  will  take  place  along  the  meridian  of  maximum  dis- 
placement. If  the  major  fault  is  filled  with  molten  magma,  and  the 
magma  solidifies,  then  this  intruded  matter,  which  has  expanded  the 
crust,  must  add  to  the  folding  in  the  lower  hemisphere,  which  is  moving 
toward  a  pole. 

In  the  lower  hemisphere  the  unbroken  lines  indicate  the  fractures 
opening  from  the  top,  as  the  arc  of  the  surface  increases. 

equatorward,  the  fractures  will  tend  to  open  from  the  bot- 
tom. This  would,  of  course,  favor  the  intrusion  into  them  of 
magma  from  below,  and,  accordingly,  Mr.  Campbell  shows 
them  filled  up  (in  black).  At  the  same  time,  as  the  reader  may 


THEMOUNTAINS  97 

see,  fractures  in  areas  moving  poleward  would  tend  to  open 
from  the  top.  These  might  be  less  likely  to  reach  sources  of 
molten  rock;  accordingly,  they  are  not  shown  filled  up. 
Whether  these  fractures  would  or  would  not  fill  up  (and 
perhaps  the  probabilities  are  that  they  would),  the  configura- 
tion of  the  resulting  solidified  veins  in  the  rocks  would  be 
very  different  from  that  in  fractures  that  had  opened  from 
the  bottom.  Campbell  has  suggested  that  this  way  of  explain- 
ing existing  fracture  patterns  in  the  crust  could  be  an  aid 
in  prospecting  for  ores,  most  of  which  occur  in  such  veins. 
It  would  be  a  question  of  ascertaining,  for  the  general  region, 
whether  the  veins  being  investigated  were  part  of  either  a 
poleward  type  or  equatorward  type  of  pattern,  and  from  this 
it  might  be  possible  to  deduce  whether  the  vein  was  to  peter 
out  or  not.  Campbell  believes  that  the  hypothesis  provides 
numerous  possibilities  for  the  exploration  of  the  crust,  some 
of  which  may  prove  eventually  to  be  of  commercial  value. 

The  time  element  is  essential  to  visualizing  the  general 
process  of  a  displacement.  Some  concept  of  the  probable 
speed  of  the  displacement  is  required.  A  basis  for  such  an 
estimate  is  provided  by  evidence  that  will  be  fully  considered 
later,  but  I  may  here  anticipate  by  saying  that  displacements 
may  have  required  periods  of  from  10,000  to  20,000  years. 
This  means  that  this  amount  of  time  would  be  available  for 
the  creation  of  the  system  of  fractures  we  are  considering.  It 
means,  for  example,  that  a  single  major  fracture,  which  might 
involve,  let  us  say,  the  pulling  apart  of  the  crust  to  a  distance 
of  several  miles  and  the  filling  up  of  the  crack  with  molten 
material  from  below,  might  be  formed  over  a  period  of 
several  thousand  years,  during  which  time  there  might  be 
spasmodically  renewed  earthquake  fracturing  and  volcanic 
effects,  interrupted  by  periods  of  quiet.  It  is  obvious  that  the 
amount  of  time  available  for  the  work  of  extension  and  frac- 
turing of  the  crust  is  sufficient  to  permit  the  process  to  com- 
plete itself  without  undue  or  incredible  violence. 

We  must  now  consider  a  question  that  relates  to  mountain 
building,  and  at  the  same  time  involves  another  of  the  major 


98  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

unsolved  problems  of  geology.  It  is  connected  with  our  phase 
of  equatorward  crust  displacement.  It  has  to  do  with  the 
filling  of  the  fractures  by  molten  magma  from  below.  Camp- 
bell considers  that  this  filling  of  the  fractures  is  the  first  step 
in  mountain  building,  or  at  least  in  the  formation  of  a 
geosyncline.  Obviously,  it  is  possible  to  start  the  process  at 
other  points;  this  is  therefore  only  a  matter  of  convenience, 
and  for  the  purpose  of  drawing  a  clear  picture  of  the  process 
for  the  reader.  But  Mr.  Campbell  points  out  that  the  process 
of  the  filling  of  the  cracks,  and  the  later  solidification  of  the 
intruded  material,  adds  extension  to  the  crust;  there  is  now 
more  surface.  When,  in  future  shifts  of  the  crust,  this  area 
passes  over  the  equator  toward  a  pole,  or  moves  poleward 
from  where  it  is,  the  extended  surface  has  to  yield  to  the 
resulting  compression  by  folding  more  than  it  would  have 
had  to  do  had  there  been  no  molten  intrusions  in  the  first 
place.  It  is,  therefore,  reasonable  to  call  this  the  first  step  in 
mountain  building,  although  there  is  as  yet  no  folding,  and 
no  uplift  of  the  rock  strata. 

But  this  question  of  molten  intrusions  into  the  crust  raises 
another  sore  point.  It  has  been,  until  now,  a  very  difficult 
thing  to  explain  the  rise  of  molten  matter  into  the  crust. 
Geologists  have  speculated  as  to  what  force  could  have  shot 
up  the  molten  matter  that  formed  the  innumerable  "dikes" 
and  "sills,"  as  the  resulting  veins  are  called.  They  have  not 
been  able  to  agree  upon  the  question.  No  reasonable  ex- 
planation of  these  millions  of  magmatic  invasions  of  the  crust 
has  been  found. 

Of  course,  it  is  realized  that  the  crust  of  the  earth  is,  in  a 
sense,  a  floating  crust.  The  materials  of  which  it  is  composed 
are  lighter,  it  is  assumed,  than  the  materials  below,  and  are 
solid,  as  compared  with  the  plastic  or  viscous  state  of  the 
underlying  layers.  The  crust  can  be  thought  of  as  floating 
in  hydrostatic  balance  in  the  semiliquid  lower  layer.  This  is 
generally  understood  among  geologists.  It  follows  logically 
from  this  that,  if  two  or  more  blocks  of  the  crust  got  sepa- 
rated with  cracks  between  them,  the  "molten"  material 


THEMOUNTAINS  99 

would  rise  in  the  crack,  and  the  blocks  would  sink,  until  the 
cracks  weie  filled  up  far  enough  to  establish  hydrostatic  bal- 
ance. But  this  did  not  solve  the  problem;  it  did  not  help 
because  nobody  could  imagine  what  could  produce  the  neces- 
sary pulling  apart  of  the  blocks. 

For  those  who  like  to  see  complicated  problems  made  sim- 
ple, Mr.  Campbell's  presentation  of  this  matter  is  worth 
considering.  He  suggests  that  the  concept  of  a  great  sector 
of  the  crust  being  stretched,  and  thereby  fractured  in  in- 
numerable places  at  one  time,  permits  a  comparison  to  be 
made  with  an  ice  sheet,  which  is  floating  on  water,  and  which 
undergoes  fracturing.  Just  as  the  individual  pieces  of  the  ice 
floe  sink,  until  they  have  displaced  their  weight  in  water, 
and  the  water  rises  in  the  cracks  between  the  pieces,  so  he 
visualizes  the  behavior  of  the  crust  during  its  displacement 
equatorward.  He  sees  this  as  the  explanation  of  the  fact  that 
although  the  crust  is  shot  through  with  igneous  invasions  of 
all  sorts,  these  are  hardly  ever  known  to  reach  the  surface  of 
the  earth.  He  compares  the  behavior  of  the  crust  during  dis- 
placement with  the  behavior  of  ice  as  follows: 

...  As  a  matter  of  fact  the  lithosphere  (or  crust)  can  be  likened  to 
ice  floating  on  water,  a  solid  and  lighter  form  of  a  substance  floating 
in  a  liquid  and  heavier  form  of  a  similar  substance.  The  solid  and 
lighter  substance  sinks  in  the  heavier  and  liquid  substance  until  it 
displaces  its  own  weight  in  the  heavier  and  liquid  substance  and  then 
floats  with  its  surplus  bulk  above  the  surface  of  the  heavier  liquid, 
which  in  the  case  of  ice  would  be  one  tenth  of  its  bulk.  To  put  it 
another  way,  if  you  were  out  on  a  lake  where  the  ice  was  ten  inches 
thick,  and  you  were  to  bore  a  hole  through  the  ice  to  the  water,  the 
water  would  rise  in  the  hole  to  within  one  inch  of  the  surface  of  the 
ice  and  remain  there.  Now,  that  is  exactly  what  happens  to  the  litho- 
sphere. It  sinks  into  the  asthenosphere  (or  subcrustal  layer)  until  it 
displaces  its  own  weight  of  the  substance  of  the  asthenosphere  and  a 
state  of  equilibrium  is  reached.  That  will  bring  the  substance  of  the 
asthenosphere  far  up  into  the  lithosphere,  wherever  it  finds  an  open- 
ing or  a  fault  that  reaches  all  the  way  to  the  bottom  of  the  litho- 
sphere (66). 

Purely  for  purposes  of  illustration,  and  not  as  an  accurate 


100  EARTH    S    SHIFTING     CRUST 

picture  of  the  facts,  Mr.  Campbell  has  made  a  very  rough 
calculation,  as  follows: 

Assuming  that  the  lithosphere  is  composed  of  granite  that  has  a 
weight  of  166  pounds  to  the  cubic  foot,  and  the  asthenosphere  con- 
sists of  soapstone  with  a  weight  of  169  pounds  per  cubic  foot,  the 
lithosphere  being  three  pounds  lighter  per  cubic  foot  than  the 
asthenosphere,  it  would  float  in  the  heavier  asthenosphere  leaving 
1.775%  of  its  volume  above  the  surface  of  the  asthenosphere,  and  as 
the  lithosphere  is  assumed  to  be  forty  miles  deep  in  this  case,  then 
1.755%  of  forty  miles  would  be  .71%  of  a  mile  above  the  top  of  the 
asthenosphere.  That  is,  the  soapstone  molten  asthenosphere  would 
rise  up  into  the  fault  to  within  three  quarters  of  a  mile  of  the  surface 
of  the  earth.  .  .  .  (66). 

Summarizing  his  general  thoughts  regarding  the  effects  of 
an  equatorward  displacement  of  a  crustal  sector,  and  the 
hydrostatic  balance  of  the  crust  itself,  Mr.  Campbell  has 
remarked: 

I  think  you  should  stress  this  point,  for,  while  the  geophysicists 
have  seen  faults  in  the  earth's  crust,  and  have  seen  many  of  these 
faults  that  they  knew  had  been  filled  up  from  below,  they  didn't  have 
any  logical  solution  of  what  caused  the  faults,  nor  did  they  connect 
the  faults  with  the  formation  of  our  mountains  (66). 


5.  The  Effects  of  Poleward  Displacement 

In  the  poleward  displacement  of  sectors  of  the  crust,  com- 
pression, instead  of  extension,  would  be  the  rule.  The  mag- 
nitudes and  the  distribution  of  forces,  and  the  time  element, 
would,  of  course,  be  the  same.  Otherwise,  the  effects  would 
be  very  different. 

We  should  have,  in  the  first  place,  some  folding  of  the 
rock  strata.  As  with  the  fractures,  the  precise  locations  of  the 
rock  foldings,  their  number,  and  their  magnitudes  would  be 
controlled  by  the  amount  of  the  displacement  locally,  the 
local  variations  of  crustal  strength  (which  would  be  less 
where  geosynclines  already  existed),  and  the  distances  of  the 
areas  concerned  from  the  central  meridian  of  movement. 


THE    MOUNTAINS  1O1 

The  amount  of  the  folding  would  be  increased  as  the  result 
of  any  previous  process  of  extension  of  that  area  of  the  crust 
in  any  previous  displacement. 

The  elastic  properties  of  the  crust  would  probably  be  of 
much  greater  importance  in  this  compressive  phase  than  in 
the  extensive  phase  of  a  displacement.  This  is  because  com- 
pression could  lead  to  flexing  or  bending  of  the  crust,  to  a 
slight  degree,  without  a  permanent  change  of  shape.  It  might 
be  possible  to  bend  or  flex  the  crust  slightly,  and  hold  it  so 
for  thousands  of  years,  without  fracture  or  folding  of  the 
rock  strata,  or  even  without  much  plastic  flow  of  the  ma- 
terials. This  would  mean  no  permanent  change  in  the  con- 
formation of  the  surface.  A  compressive  tension  might  be 
exerted  for  thousands  of  years,  causing  a  flexing,  and  then 
be  relaxed,  permitting  the  crust  to  return  to  its  original 
shape.  It  may  be  supposed  that  in  areas  sufficiently  removed 
from  the  meridian  of  maximum  displacement,  the  com- 
pressive tensions  on  the  crust  might  be  contained  by  its  ten- 
sile strength,  and  the  crust  might  yield  elastically,  without 
deformation.  If  this  occurred,  however,  the  total  amount  of 
the  compression  for  the  whole  circumference  of  the  globe 
would  probably  be  concentrated  at  comparatively  few  points, 
where  the  compressive  stresses  happened  to  be  in  excess  of 
the  strength  of  the  crust;  here  there  would  be  a  considerable 
amount  of  folding  of  the  rock  strata.  It  is  obvious,  also,  that 
these  points  would  tend  to  coincide  with  existing  geosyn- 
clines,  which  would  naturally  represent  comparatively  weak 
zones,  where  the  crust  would  be  less  able  to  withstand  the 
horizontal  stress. 

Mr.  Campbell  suggests  that  in  an  area  displaced  poleward, 
no  fewer  than  four  pressures  will  be  operating  simul- 
taneously on  the  crust.  There  will  be,  in  the  first  place,  two 
pressures  developing  from  opposite  directions  toward  the 
meridian  of  displacement.  These  will  arise  because  of  the 
diminishing  circumference.  Two  other  pressures  will  simul- 
taneously develop  at  right  angles  to  these,  as  the  result  of  the 
reduced  radius.  Since  the  radius  is  only  one  sixth  of  the  cir- 


IDS  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

cumference,  the  forces  will  be  in  proportion;  the  folds  due 
to  the  first  compression  will  tend  to  be  six  times  as  long  (and 
accentuated)  as  those  due  to  the  second  compression.  The 
former  may  ultimately  correspond  with  the  long  axes  of 
the  mountain  ranges,  and  the  latter  to  their  radial  axes.  The 
long,  narrow,  folded  tracts  referred  to  by  Button  are  thus 
explained. 

In  Figure  II  Mr.  Campbell  has  suggested  an  idealized  rep- 
resentation of  the  formation  of  a  mountain  chain  by  a  dis- 
placement of  the  crust.  The  reader  will  note  the  long  major 
axis,  and  the  shorter  radial  axes.  That  this  is  a  fairly  close 
approximation  to  the  patterns  of  existing  mountain  ranges 
is  obvious;  however,  a  number  of  modifying  factors  must  be 
recognized.  In  the  first  place,  we  do  not  contemplate  that  a 
mountain  range  can  be  completed  in  the  course  of  one  move- 
ment of  the  crust.  It  is  quite  obvious,  from  the  quantitative 
considerations  already  mentioned,  that  a  single  displacement 
could  cause  comparatively  little  folding,  even  if,  as  the  result 
of  elastic  yielding,  most  of  the  folding  was  concentrated  in  a 
few  areas.  It  is  certain  that  many  displacements  would  be  re- 
quired to  make  a  large  mountain  range,  and  since  successive 
displacements  will  not  necessarily  occur  in  the  same  direc- 
tions on  the  earth's  surface,  the  resulting  patterns  might 
rarely  conform  to  the  idealized  pattern.  And  yet,  if  most  of 
the  folding  in  one  displacement  happened  to  be  concen- 
trated in  one  area,  and  if  one  or  more  successive  displace- 
ments happened  to  concentrate  folding  in  the  same  area,  a 
mountain  range  might  come  into  existence  in  a  compara- 
tively short  period  of  two  or  three  hundred  thousand  years. 
We  will  return  to  this  chronological  aspect  again. 

It  should  not  be  thought  that  Mr.  Campbell  is  in  disagree- 
ment with  Button's  statement,  quoted  above,  that  the  com- 
pressive  mountain-folding  forces  have  acted  in  one  direction 
only  on  the  earth's  surface.  This  would  be  a  misunderstand- 
ing of  the  case.  The  laws  of  physics  require  the  operation  of 
equal  and  opposite  forces  for  the  production  of  effects.  A 
compression  is  the  result  of  two  equal  and  opposite  pressures. 


THE    MOUNTAINS 


There  is  still  one  definite  direction,  such  as  northeast-south- 
west, in  which  the  compression  operates  on  the  crust. 


4.  The  Mountain-Building  Force 

An  apparently  formidable  objection  that  has  been  raised  to 
this  theory  of  mountain  formation  is  that  the  force  pro- 
vided by  the  icecaps  cannot  be  sufficient.  When  you  look  at 
the  towering  summits  of  the  Sierras  from  your  speeding 
plane,  and  your  eye  takes  in  the  numberless  peaks  fading 
away  into  the  far  horizon,  you  are  impressed  by  the  thought 
of  the  enormous  force  that  must  have  been  required  to  raise 
this  great  chain  of  mountains.  How  could  all  this  have  been 
the  result  of  a  gentle  pressure  applied  to  the  crust  of  the 
earth  by  distant  icecaps? 

Campbell  has  shown  that  the  apparent  discrepancy  be- 
tween the  cause  and  the  effect,  here,  is  the  result  of  a  misap- 
prehension as  to  the  identity  of  the  actual  force  responsible 
for  the  mountain  folding.  His  calculations  (given  and  dis- 
cussed in  Chapter  XII)  show  that  the  thrust  transmitted  to 
the  lithosphere  by  the  icecap  is  of  the  right  order  of  magni- 
tude to  bring  about  the  fracturing  of  the  crust.  The  icecap 
may  therefore  be  responsible  for  the  movement  of  the  crust; 
yet  it  is  not  the  force  directly  responsible  for  the  folding  of 
the  mountains.  The  latter  is  a  much  greater  force.  Mr.  Camp- 
bell shows  that  the  mountain-folding  force  is  none  other  than 
the  force  of  gravity  itself.  He  suggests  that  the  icecap  per- 
forms the  function  merely  of  sliding  the  crust  horizontally 
to  a  place  where  the  force  of  gravity  can  act  upon  it.  When 
an  area  is  moved  toward  a  pole,  where  the  radii  of  the  earth 
are  shorter,  circumference  is  shorter,  and  surface  required  is 
less,  there  is  a  surplus  of  surface,  and  this,  being  pulled  down 
by  gravity,  must  fold.  From  this  point  of  view,  it  appears  that 
the  mountains  are  not  pushed  up  at  all,  and  therefore,  no 
lifting  force  is  required;  instead,  it  is  the  surface  of  the  earth 
that  is  pulled  down,  by  gravity,  nearer  to  the  earth's  center, 


104  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

as  a  sector  of  the  crust  approaches  a  pole.  Where  this  hap- 
pens, the  surplus  surface  must  fold.  Thus  it  is  the  force  of 
gravity,  over  a  large  area,  that  folds  the  crust  in  a  small  area. 

It  may  help  the  reader  to  grasp  this  idea  if  he  will  visualize 
a  flat  area  on  the  equator  which,  in  process  of  being  displaced 
with  the  crust  as  far  as  a  pole,  has  been  folded  enough  to  pro- 
duce mountains  six  miles  high.  Now,  actually,  the  peaks  of 
those  mountains  are  no  farther  from  the  center  of  the  earth 
than  the  flat  area  was  at  the  equator.  Their  altitude,  with 
reference  to  the  earth's  center,  is  unchanged.  What  has 
changed  altitude,  however,  is  the  rest  of  the  surface,  outside 
the  mountain  chain.  That  has  been  pulled  down  six  miles. 
What  pulled  it  down,  obviously,  was  the  force  of  gravity,  and 
the  reason  it  was  pulled  down  was  that  it  was  first  shifted 
horizontally  to  a  place  where  gravity  could  act  upon  it. 

Here,  then,  is  the  answer  to  the  long-standing  enigma  of 
the  source  of  the  energy  for  mountain  folding.  The  moun- 
tains are  not  lifted  up  at  all;  the  surface  is  pulled  down,  the 
force  of  gravity  does  the  pulling,  and  folding  results  where 
there  happens  to  be  excess  of  surface. 


JF.  Existing  Fracture  Systems  as  Evidence  for  the  Theory 

It  is  ordinarily  considered  a  strong  argument  in  favor  of 
a  hypothesis  if  it  enables  one  to  anticipate  the  discovery  of 
phenomena.  Campbell  has  shown  that  the  theory  of  displace- 
ments of  the  earth's  crust  calls  for  the  existence  of  great  sys- 
tems of  parallel  fractures,  intersected  by  other  fractures  at 
right  angles  to  them.  It  was  some  time  after  Mr.  Campbell 
began  to  consider  this  matter,  and  quite  independently  of 
him,  that  I  became  aware  of  the  fact  that  such  fracture  pat- 
terns do,  in  fact,  extend  over  the  whole  face  of  the  globe, 
and  that  geologists  are  in  agreement  that  their  origin  is  un- 
explained. Many  years  ago  Hobbs  pointed  out  that  they 
must  have  been  the  result  of  the  operation  of  some  world- 
wide force: 


THE    MOUNTAINS  105 

The  recognition  within  the  fracture  complex  of  the  earth's  outer 
shell  of  a  unique  and  relatively  simple  pattern,  common  to  at  least 
a  large  portion  of  the  surface,  obscured  though  it  may  be  in  local  dis- 
tricts through  the  superimposition  of  more  or  less  disorderly  fracture 
complexes,  must  be  regarded  as  of  the  most  fundamental  importance. 
It  points  inevitably  to  the  conclusion  that  more  or  less  uniform  con- 
ditions of  stress  and  strain  have  been  common  to  probably  the  earth's 
entire  outer  shell  (217:163). 

As  I  have  pointed  out,  Mr.  Campbell's  projected  pattern 
of  fractures  is  a  sort  of  gridiron,  with  major  fractures  paral- 
leling the  meridians,  and  minor  fractures  at  right  angles  to 
them.  In  the  actual  earth's  surface,  however,  there  are  two 
such  patterns.  One  of  them  consists  of  north-south  fractures 
paralleling  the  meridians,  intersected  by  east-west  fractures 
paralleling  the  equator.  The  second  gridiron  is  diagonal  to 
the  first;  the  lines  run  northeast-southwest,  and  northwest- 
southeast.  As  to  why  there  should  be  two  such  distinct  frac- 
ture complexes  in  the  crust,  I  shall  have  more  to  say  later  on. 
Hobbs  insists  that  the  existence  of  these  world-wide  patterns 
points  to  a  cause  acting  globally;  they  could  not  have  been 
the  result  of  local  causes;  the  force  causing  the  fracturing 
must  have  acted  simultaneously,  so  to  speak,  over  a  great 
part  of  the  whole  surface  of  the  earth: 

.  .  .  The  results  of  this  correlation  possess  considerable  significance 
inasmuch  as  it  is  clear  that  over  quite  an  appreciable  fraction  of  the 
earth's  surface,  the  main  lines  of  fracture  betray  evidence  of  common 
origin.  .  .  .  (218:15). 

The  fracturing  of  the  crust  under  the  operation  of  some 
global  force  has  been  accompanied  by  much  tilting  and  rela- 
tive movement  of  blocks  of  considerable  size,  resulting  in  the 
alteration  of  topographic  features.  One  of  the  earlier  geolo- 
gists, Lapworth,  remarked  with  considerable  truth,  though 
also  with  some  exaggeration,  that 

On  the  surface  of  the  globe  this  double  set  of  longitudinal  and 
transverse  waves  is  everywhere  apparent.  They  account  for  the  de- 
tailed disposition  of  our  lands,  and  our  waters,  for  our  present  coastal 
forms,  for  the  direction,  length  and  disposition  of  our  mountain 
ranges  and  plains  and  lakes  (430:296). 


io6  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

It  is  clear,  I  think,  from  what  has  already  been  said,  that 
Lapworth  was  in  error  in  ascribing  the  folded  mountains  to 
the  effects  of  fracturing  alone.  However,  it  may  well  be  that 
formation  of  block  mountains,  such  as  the  Sierra  Nevadas, 
can  be  accounted  for  in  this  way.  Innumerable  other  features 
of  the  crust  have  been  formed  or  obviously  much  affected 
by  the  fracture  patterns.  Hobbs,  for  example,  has  maps  of 
river  systems  in  Connecticut  and  Ontario,  showing  how 
closely  the  rivers  and  their  tributaries  follow  the  lines  of  the 
fracture  systems  (216:226).  Many  river  beds,  many  submarine 
canyons,  were  never  created  by  subaerial  erosion;  they  were, 
instead,  the  results  of  deep  fractures  in  the  crust,  later  occu- 
pied by  rivers  or  by  the  sea.  On  the  land  erosion  no  doubt 
often,  if  not  usually,  completed  the  shaping  of  the  valleys, 
while  turbidity  currents  may  have  created  or  deepened  can- 
yons in  the  unconsolidated  materials  of  the  ocean  bottom 

037>  139*  M0)- 

A  succession  of  theories  to  account  for  the  world-wide  or 

"planetary"  fracture  patterns  has  been  developed  and  re- 
jected. As  soon  as  it  became  clear  that  these  patterns  could 
not  be  explained  as  the  result  of  local  forces,  the  problem 
was  recognized  as  very  formidable.  Sonder,  a  Swiss  geologist, 
attempted  to  explain  them  as  the  result  of  a  difference  in  the 
compressibility  (or  elasticity)  of  the  rocks  of  the  continents 
as  compared  with  those  under  the  oceans.  But  Umbgrove 
pointed  out  that  this  would  call  for  independent  fracture 
systems  for  each  of  the  continents,  whereas  existing  fracture 
patterns  extend  to  several  continents  (430:300-01). 

The  Dutch  geologist  Vening  Meinesz  suggested  that  the 
fracture  patterns  could  be  explained  mathematically  by  a 
displacement  of  the  crust  of  the  earth.  He  postulated  one 
displacement  about  300,000,000  years  ago,  through  about  70° 
of  latitude  (194:204^.  Umbgrove  rejected  this  theory  be- 
cause he  saw  that  there  were  many  features  of  the  earth's  sur- 
face that  could  not  be  explained  by  the  particular  displace- 
ment suggested  by  Vening  Meinesz.  This  is  not  at  all 
remarkable,  since  it  is  quite  impossible  to  see  how  any  one 


THE     MOUNTAINS  107 

displacement,  and  particularly  one  300,000,000  years  ago, 
can  be  made  to  explain  most  of  the  earth's  present  topo- 
graphic features.  Umbgrove  was  justified  in  rejecting  the 
Vening  Meinesz  theory,  but  he  admitted  that  this  left  him 
with  no  explanation  at  all.  "...  On  the  other  hand,  it  means 
that  the  origin  of  both  lineament  systems  remains  an  un- 
solved problem"  (430:307). 

Some  writers  have  suggested  that  the  two  fracture  systems 
originated  at  different  times,  and  this  is  a  very  important 
point.  Umbgrove  says: 

It  is  a  rather  widespread  belief  that  the  origin  of  faults  with  a  cer- 
tain strike  dates  from  a  special  period,  whereas  faults  with  a  markedly 
different  strike  would  date  from  another  well-defined  period.  In  cer- 
tain areas  this  conviction  is  founded  upon  sound  arguments.  .  .  . 
(430:298). 

He  continues: 

Some  authors,  however,  have  doubtless  overrated  the  relation  be- 
tween the  direction  and  the  time  of  origin  of  a  fault  system.  As  a 
typical  example,  I  may  mention  Philipp,  who  once  advanced  the 
opinion  that  the  direction  of  the  principal  fault  lines  of  northwestern 
Europe  changed  from  W.  and  W.N.W.  in  the  Upper  Jurassic  toward 
N.  or  N.N.E.  in  the  Oligocene,  and  thence  E.N.E.  in  the  upper 
Tertiary  and  Pleistocene.  He  added  the  hypothesis  that  their  rotation 
could  have  been  caused  by  a  large  displacement  of  the  poles.  In  the 
meantime  it  has  been  shown  that  some  faults  with  a  meridional  strike 
date  from  much  older  periods.  Moreover,  large  and  well-defined 
faults  with  a  N.N.W.  direction  dating  at  least  from  the  Upper  Paleo- 
zoic appear  to  have  been  of  paramount  influence  in  the  structural 
history  of  the  Netherlands.  Therefore  Philipp's  hypothesis  has  to  be 
abandoned  because  it  is  inconsistent  with  well-established  facts  (430: 
298). 

Abandoned  much  too  soon!  The  reader  can  easily  see  that 
the  objections  Umbgrove  raises  to  Philipp's  theory  are  re- 
moved by  the  present  theory  of  crust  displacements.  With 
this  assumption,  it  would  be  inevitable  that,  in  the  long  his- 
tory of  the  globe,  the  poles  would  often  be  found  in  about 
the  same  situations.  If  the  strikes  of  the  fault  systems  are 
related  to  the  positions  of  the  poles,  those  of  later  periods 


io8  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

would  often  coincide  approximately  with  those  of  earlier 
periods. 

We  find  in  this  very  fact  the  answer  to  another  of  the  mys- 
teries of  geology,  the  so-called  "rejuvenation"  of  similar  fea- 
tures in  the  same  geographical  situations  at  various  times. 
The  term  "rejuvenation"  is  a  commonplace  of  geological 
literature,  and  is  especially  emphasized  by  Umbgrove.  He 
is  puzzled  by  the  fact  that  old  geological  features  have  re- 
peatedly been  called  back  to  life.  It  seems  that  this  renewal 
of  old  topographies  may  be  explained  by  the  accidental  re- 
turn of  the  poles  to  approximately  the  same  places. 

There  is  nothing  remarkable  about  the  fact  that  only  two 
world-wide  fracture  systems  can  now  be  recognized  in  the 
crust.  If  each  successive  displacement  produced  a  new  grid- 
iron pattern  of  fractures  and  resulting  surface  features,  it 
must,  in  addition,  have  disrupted  the  evidence  of  previous 
patterns.  In  a  long  series  of  displacements,  the  older  frac- 
ture patterns  must  soon  be  reduced  to  an  indistinguishable 
jumble.  It  is  probable  that  the  two  systems  now  recognizable 
date  only  from  the  last  two  displacements  of  the  crust  (to  be 
discussed  later),  even  though  many  of  the  fractures  and  indi- 
vidual topographic  features  now  coinciding  with  these  sys- 
tems may  date  from  remote  periods. 

It  is  not  true,  of  course,  that  in  one  displacement  of  the 
crust  all  fractures  all  over  the  earth  will  form  a  single  rec- 
tilinear pattern.  This  can  be  made  clear  from  an  example. 
Let  us  suppose  (as  we  shall  in  Chapter  VII)  that  North  Amer- 
ica was  moved  directly  southward  at  the  end  of  the  last  ice 
age.  Campbell  has  suggested  that  major  fractures  would  run 
north  and  south  (meridionally)  and  minor  fractures  east  and 
west,  and  this  would  be  true  of  the  whole  Western  Hemi- 
sphere, which  was,  presumably,  moved  southward,  and  of 
the  opposite  side  of  the  earth,  which  was  equally  displaced 
northward.  But  what  about  Europe?  If,  before  the  last  dis- 
placement, the  pole  was  situated  in  or  near  Hudson  Bay,  it 
seems  that  the  last  displacement  must  have  created  diagonal 
and  not  meridional  fractures  in  Europe,  for  the  reason  that 


THE     MOUNTAINS 

Europe  was  nowhere  near  the  meridian  of  displacement. 
Thus,  in  one  given  displacement,  a  meridional  fracture  pat- 
tern will  be  created  near  the  meridian  of  displacement,  a 
diagonal  fracture  pattern  in  very  large  areas  approximately 
4.5  degrees  from  this  meridian,  and,  of  course,  no  fracture 
pattern  in  the  ''pivot"  areas,  90  degrees  from  the  meridian  of 
displacement,  where  no  displacement  will  occur. 

Lately,  the  oceanographic  research  work  under  the  direc- 
tion of  Ewing  has  resulted  in  tracing  a  globe-encircling  crack 
in  the  bottoms  of  the  Atlantic,  Indian,  and  Pacific  Oceans, 
and  has  connected  it  with  the  Great  Rift  Valley  in  Africa. 
The  pattern  that  has  been  traced  out  is  about  40,000  miles 
long;  it  is  reported  that  there  is  seismic  activity  at  present 
along  the  whole  length  of  the  crack,  suggesting  recent  dis- 
turbance of  the  area  and  a  still-continuing  process.  The 
crack  appears  to  average  two  miles  in  depth  and  twenty  miles 
in  width.  The  fact  that  it  is  connected  with  the  Rift  Valley 
in  Africa,  that  it  bisects  Iceland,  and  apparently  invades 
Siberia,  indicates  that  it  is  not  a  phenomenon  of  ocean  ba- 
sins only.  It  is,  on  the  contrary,  clearly  a  global  phenomenon. 
The  Columbia  Research  News,  published  by  Columbia  Uni- 
versity, in  its  issue  of  March,  1957,  described  the  discovery 
thus: 

In  January,  Columbia  University  geologists  announced  the  dis- 
covery of  a  world-wide  rift  believed  to  have  been  caused  by  the  pull- 
ing apart  of  the  earth's  crust.  The  big  rift  traverses  the  floors  of  all 
the  oceans  and  comes  briefly  to  shore  on  three  continents  in  a  system 
of  apparently  continuous  lines  .  .  .  45,000  miles  long. 

Throughout  its  vast  length  the  world-wide  rift  seems  to  be  remark- 
ably uniform  in  shape,  consisting  of  a  central  valley  or  trench  aver- 
aging 20  to  25  miles  in  width  and  flanked  on  either  side  by  75  mile- 
wide  belts  of  jagged  mountains  rising  a  mile  or  two  above  the  valley. 
The  peaks  of  the  highest  mountains  in  the  system  are  from  3,600  to 
7,200  feet  below  the  ocean's  surface  while  the  long  undersea  stretches 
of  the  rift  valley  itself  lie  from  two  to  four  miles  down.  In  addition 
to  being  marked  by  its  topography,  the  globe-circling  formation  is 
the  source  of  shallow  earthquakes  that  are  still  going  on  along  its 
entire  length— an  indication  that,  if  the  rift  is  due  to  a  pulling  apart 
of  the  earth's  crust,  the  geological  feature  is  a  young  and  growing  one. 


110  EARTH    S     SHIFTING     CRUST 

What  could  be  the  cause  of  such  a  pulling  apart  of  the 
crust?  Surely  not  a  shrinking  and  cooling  of  the  earth.  It  is 
also  very  unlikely,  it  will  be  admitted,  that  the  earth  could 
be  growing  fast  enough  to  produce  this  split  and  the  accom- 
panying geological  instability.  On  the  other  hand,  a  displace- 
ment of  the  crust,  or  rather  a  series  of  them,  may  explain  the 
facts.  It  even  appears  that  here,  in  this  system  of  profound 
cracks  in  the  crust,  we  have  evidence  of  the  existence  of  zones 
of  crustal  weakness  along  which,  perhaps  time  and  again,  the 
splits  have  occurred  that  have  permitted  the  displacement  of 
the  crust,  and  at  the  same  time  have  relieved  some  of  the 
resulting  tension  and  thereby  limited  the  tectonic  conse- 
quences of  the  displacements  so  far  as  other  areas  of  the 
earth's  surface  are  concerned. 

To  return  briefly  to  the  question  of  block  mountains,  Mr. 
Campbell  has  a  further  suggestion  as  to  the  way  in  which 
compression  in  a  poleward  displacement,  and  subsequent 
fracturing,  may  combine  to  cause  them.  One  of  the  problems 
that  awaits  solution  in  geology  is  the  cause  of  the  widespread 
doming  and  basining  of  the  crust  that  occurs  from  place  to 
place.  The  domes  are  sometimes  of  considerable  extent.  Ex- 
amples of  basins  include  the  Gulf  of  Mexico  and  the  Caspian 
and  Black  Seas.  Campbell  points  out  that  if  an  area  is  dis- 
placed poleward,  and  is  thereby  subjected  to  four  compres- 
sions, as  already  mentioned,  limited  areas  will  be  entrapped 
by  these  compressions,  and  doming  must  result;  conversely, 
in  areas  moved  equatorward  the  reverse  must  occur,  and 
larger  or  smaller  basins  will  tend  to  be  produced. 

A  block  mountain  might  tend  to  be  produced,  Mr.  Camp- 
bell thinks,  if  a  major  fault  should  bisect  a  domed-up  area. 
This  would  create  the  possibility  that  the  abutting  rock  sec- 
tions of  one  half  of  the  dome  might  give  way,  allowing  half 
the  dome  to  collapse,  and  pushing  subcrustal  viscous  or  plas- 
tic rock  under  the  other  half  of  the  dome,  thus  rendering 
the  latter  permanent.  This  effect,  however,  would  depend 
upon  many  local  circumstances. 


THE    MOUNTAINS  111 


PART  II.  Volcanism  and  Other  Questions 

In  the  preceding  part  of  this  chapter  we  have  sketched  the 
principal  problems  that  are  basic  to  the  formation  of  the 
folded  mountains  and  block  mountains,  and  have  examined 
the  planetary  fracture  systems  in  the  light  of  Campbell's 
mechanism  for  crust  displacement.  There  are,  however,  a 
number  of  other  aspects  of  this  general  problem  that  must 
now  engage  our  attention.  We  must  consider,  in  turn,  the 
remarkable  phenomena  of  volcanism,  in  their  relationship  to 
crust  displacement.  In  connection  with  the  creation  of  vol- 
canic mountains  we  must  consider  briefly  the  question  of  the 
origin  of  the  heat  of  the  earth,  an  unsolved  problem  of  great 
interest.  We  must  then  examine  the  relationship  of  crust 
displacement  and  mountain  building  to  the  question  of 
changes  in  the  sea  level.  Finally,  we  must  consider  the  prob- 
lem of  the  chronology  of  mountain  building. 


6.  Volcanism 

We  have  seen  that  one  kind  of  mountain  is  the  volcanic 
mountain.  Volcanic  phenomena  cover  a  wide  range;  all  of 
these  must  be  considered  in  order  to  see  how  far  they  can  be 
related  to  a  general  cause.  The  phenomena  that  need  ex- 
plaining include  volcanic  eruptions,  the  creation  (sometimes 
rapid)  of  volcanic  mountains  on  land  or  in  the  sea,  the  gene- 
sis of  volcanic  island  arcs,  and  last  but  not  least  the  vast  lava 
flows  or  lava  floods  that  have  at  times  in  the  past  inundated 
great  areas  of  the  earth's  surface. 

Since  volcanoes  occur  frequently,  and  are  the  most 
dramatic  manifestations  of  volcanism,  they  have  been  thor- 
oughly studied,  and  a  whole  literature  has  been  devoted  to 
them.  It  is  astonishing,  therefore,  that  neither  the  causes  of 
volcanoes  nor  the  present  distribution  of  volcanic  zones  on 


112  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

the  earth's  surface  has  as  yet  received  an  acceptable  explana- 
tion. As  in  the  case  of  other  unsolved  problems,  the  absence 
of  certainty  has  led  to  a  multiplicity  of  theories.  Jaggar,  one 
of  the  best  field  observers  of  volcanoes,  refers  to  the  two 
leading  theories  thus: 

It  would  be  hard  to  imagine  any  more  completely  different  ex- 
planations for  the  same  phenomenon  than  is  R.  A.  Daly's  doctrine  of 
the  causes  of  volcanic  action,  as  compared  with  the  crystallization 
theory  of  A.  L.  Day  (235:150). 

Dr.  A.  L.  Day  was  formerly  director  of  the  Geophysical 
Laboratory  in  Washington;  his  theory  is  based  upon  geo- 
physical experiments  conducted  in  the  laboratory.  He  ob- 
served that  the  crystallization  of  rock  from  the  molten  state 
resulted  in  some  increase  in  volume.  He  assumed  that  the 
whole  crust  was  once  molten,  and  that  as  it  cooled  it  contin- 
ued to  contain,  here  and  there,  comparatively  small  pockets 
of  molten  rock.  When  such  pockets  of  molten  rock  finally 
were  cooled  to  the  crystallization  point,  then  expansion 
would  occur,  and  great  pressures  would  be  set  up,  which 
might  lead  to  eruption  at  the  surface.  This  theory  is  based 
upon  the  assumption  of  the  molten  origin  of  the  earth,  and 
carries  with  it  the  corollary  that  volcanic  eruptions  are  essen- 
tially local  phenomena.  Dr.  Day  insisted  that  volcanoes  were 
not  connected  with  a  molten  layer  under  the  crust,  and  were 
not  related  to  events  occurring  over  large  areas. 

Professor  R.  A.  Daly  based  his  opposed  theory  on  his  ob- 
servations of  the  field  evidence  of  geology.  He  insisted  that 
only  the  assumption  of  a  molten  layer  under  the  crust  could 
account  for  the  countless  facts  of  igneous  geology.  His  theory 
is  reconcilable  either  with  the  assumption  of  the  molten  ori- 
gin of  the  globe  or  with  the  theory  of  a  growing  and  heating 
earth. 

Jaggar  objects  to  Day's  view  that  volcanoes  are  purely  lo- 
cal. He  says: 

There  is  some  reason  to  think  that  a  very  long  crack  in  the  bottom 
of  the  Pacific  Ocean,  with  interruptions  by  very  deep  water,  extends 


THE    MOUNTAINS  11$ 

all  the  way  from  New  Zealand  to  Hawaii,  because  there  are  striking 
sympathies  of  eruptive  data  between  the  volcanoes  of  New  Zealand, 
Tonga,  Samoa  and  Hawaii  (235:23). 

He  lists  a  number  of  eruptions  with  their  dates  to  show  their 
intimate  connection.  In  particular  he  mentions  the  eruption 
of  August  31,  1886,  on  the  island  of  Niuafoo,  Polynesia: 

.  .  .  Only  two  months  before,  Tarawere  Volcano  was  erupted  dis- 
astrously in  New  Zealand,  indicating  volcanic  sympathy  between  two 
craters  hundreds  of  miles  apart  on  the  same  general  rift  in  the  earth's 
crust  (235:95). 

These  observations  imply  that  a  connection  may  exist,  at 
least  in  some  cases,  between  volcanoes  at  great  distances  from 
each  other,  because  of  their  being  located  along  the  same 
crack  in  the  earth's  crust.  This  implies  a  connection  between 
the  deep  fracturing  of  the  earth's  crust  and  volcanism.  We 
have  seen  that  Columbia  scientists  have  just  discovered  a 
vast  connected  system  of  rift  valleys,  or  cracks  in  the  crust, 
extending  over  the  surface  of  the  whole  planet,  and  associ- 
ated at  the  present  time  with  constant  seismic  disturbances. 
Jaggar  makes  it  clear  that  volcanic  eruptions,  as  well  as  earth- 
quakes, may  be  associated  with  such  rifts.  Since  the  crust  is 
relatively  thin,  it  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that  the  molten 
rock  erupting  in  volcanoes  at  great  distances  from  each  other 
must  come  from  below  the  crust,  and  that  it  is  not  created 
by  any  processes  occurring  within  the  crust  itself.  All  this  is 
confirmation  of  Daly's  position. 

Another  theory  of  volcanic  action  that  should  be  men- 
tioned briefly  is  that  associated  with  the  name  of  W.  H. 
Hobbs.  It  was  his  view  that  volcanic  action  could  result  from 
horizontal  pressure  arching  up  a  sector  of  the  crust.  This  is 
based  on  the  fact  that  if  a  rock  that  is  too  hot  to  crystallize  at 
normal  pressures  is  subjected  to  great  pressure,  it  may  take 
the  solid  state.  Subsequently,  the  release  of  the  pressure  is 
all  that  is  required  to  restore  the  rock  to  its  liquid  con- 
dition. In  the  earth's  crust  considerable  amounts  of  rock 
may  be  held  in  the  solid  state  by  the  pressure  of  overlying 
strata.  Then,  if  horizontal  pressure  arches  the  crust,  the 


ii4  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

pressure  on  the  rock  below  will  be  relieved,  and  the  rock 
will  resume  a  liquid  state.  If  the  arching  results  in  cracking 
at  the  surface,  or  in  sufficient  lateral  squeezing  of  the  liquid 
pockets,  eruption  may  take  place.  This  effect  may  account  for 
the  vast  masses  of  igneous  rock  that  are  found  associated  with 
the  folded  mountain  ranges  (215:58),  but  it  is  necessary  to 
ask  the  question,  What  causes  the  arching  of  the  crust?  Ob- 
viously, volcanism,  according  to  this  theory,  must  be  traced 
to  the  cause  of  the  arching.  Hobbs's  theory  is  not  very  satis- 
factory because  he  cannot  explain  the  arching. 

It  is  clear  that  volcanism  might  occur  as  the  result  either 
of  the  process  imagined  by  Day  or  of  that  imagined  by  Hobbs, 
for  several  different  causes  might  produce  liquid  pockets  in 
the  crust.  But  it  is  equally  clear  that  neither  they  nor  Daly 
has  advanced  a  theory  to  account  for  volcanoes,  volcanic 
zones,  plateau  basalts,  and  volcanic  mountains.  Einstein, 
when  he  first  received  some  material  outlining  the  theory 
proposed  in  this  book,  wrote  me  that  it  was  the  only  theory 
he  had  ever  seen  that  could  explain  the  volcanic  zones  (128). 
These,  of  course,  can  be  explained  as  zones  of  fracture  (such 
as  the  rift  valleys  just  mentioned)  resulting  from  crust  dis- 
placements. 


7.  The  Volcanic  Island  Arcs 

Campbell  has  suggested  an  explanation  for  the  formation 
of  the  volcanic  island  arcs,  so  many  of  which  are  found  in 
the  Pacific,  and  which  consist  of  chains  of  volcanic  moun- 
tains in  the  sea.  He  shows  not  only  how  our  theory  of  crust 
displacement  may  account  for  the  formation  of  these  vol- 
canic mountains  but  also  how  it  may  account  for  their  oc- 
currence in  graceful  curves: 

As  a  sector  of  the  lithosphere,  or  crust,  moves  toward  the  equator, 
the  motion  is  fastest  and  the  tension  is  greatest  on  the  meridian  of 
movement,  and  great  north-south  faults  will  open  up,  beginning 
there  and  spreading  east  and  west.  At  the  same  time  transverse  faults 


THE    MOUNTAINS  117 

of  the  earth.  Smart,  for  example,  is  of  the  opinion  that  radio- 
activity cannot  produce  heat  in  the  earth  as  fast  as  it  can  be 
radiated  through  the  crust  into  outer  space  (396:62). 

Some  of  the  essential  facts  in  any  consideration  of  the 
question  of  the  origin  of  the  earth's  heat  may  be  summarized 
as  follows.  First,  we  know  nothing  of  the  temperature  of 
the  earth's  interior.  We  can  only  guess  at  it.  We  have  made 
deductions  concerning  it  from  the  heat  gradient  observed 
in  the  world's  deepest  mines.  As  we  descend  to  a  depth  of 
about  four  miles,  the  heat  steadily  increases  (194:139).  We 
have  assumed  that  the  increase  of  heat  continues  at  the  same 
rate  farther  down,  perhaps  all  the  way  to  the  earth's  center, 
but  there  are  a  number  of  facts  that  throw  doubt  on  this 
assumption.  For  one  thing,  Daly  thought  he  saw  evidence 
that  the  heat  gradient  differs  in  America  and  in  Europe, 
being  somewhat  steeper  in  North  America  (194:139).  This 
would  imply  that  there  is  more  heat  in  the  earth's  crust  in 
North  America  than  there  is  in  Europe.  Benfield  produced 
much  more  evidence  of  variations  in  heat  from  place  to 
place  (28)  which  are  difficult  to  reconcile  with  a  uniform  heat 
gradient  in  the  earth. 

Geophysicists  have  now  concluded  that  the  earth's  heat 
originates  in  the  crust  itself,  and  does  not  come  from  the 
deep  interior  (194:157).  The  considerations  on  which  this 
conclusion  is  based  are  too  technical  for  discussion  here,  but 
there  seems  to  be  no  reason  to  doubt  their  validity.  This  con- 
clusion is,  of  course,  irreconcilable  with  any  assumption  that 
the  earth's  heat  is  simply  the  remnant  of  far  higher  tempera- 
tures prevailing  in  a  molten  stage. 

A  matter  of  great  importance  for  the  general  problem  is 
the  rate  at  which  heat  migrates  through  the  crust,  and  is 
dissipated  into  outer  space.  Geophysicists  have  determined 
that  the  rate  of  heat  migration  through  the  crust  is  extremely 
slow.  Jeffreys  calculated  that  it  would  take  130,000,000  years 
to  cool  a  column  of  sedimentary  rock  7  miles  below  the 
earth's  surface  by  250°  C.  (241:136).  As  a  result  of  this, 
the  climate  of  the  earth's  surface  is  determined  entirely  by  the 


n8  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

radiant  heat  of  the  sun,  and  is  uninfluenced  by  heat  from 
within  the  earth.  We  shall  have  to  consider  the  bearing  of 
this  on  another  well-known  fact,  which  is  that  earthquakes, 
and  other  movements  within  the  crust,  are  known  to  produce 
heat  as  a  consequence  of  friction  between  the  moving  crustal 
blocks  (194:158).  Then,  earthquakes  are  most  frequent  in 
areas  where  there  are  distortions  of  the  gravitational  balance 
of  the  crust,  while  heat  gradients  are  steeper  in  such  areas 
(194:141).  This  indicates  that  any  factor  causing  such  distor- 
tions may  be  a  factor  in  the  production  of  the  earth's  heat. 

Considering  these  facts,  what  are  the  implications,  so  far 
as  the  earth's  heat  is  concerned,  of  a  displacement  of  the 
earth's  crust?  Can  there  be  any  doubt  that  a  crust  moving 
slowly  over  a  period  of  a  good  many  thousand  years  must 
generate  an  immense  quantity  of  heat  within  itself?  There 
can  be  no  doubt  of  this.  The  widespread  fracturing,  the  fric- 
tion between  crustal  blocks,  resulting  from  the  increased 
number  of  earthquakes,  could  have  no  other  result.  More- 
over, Frankland  has  pointed  out  that  friction  between  the 
crust  and  the  layer  over  which  it  moves  must  produce  heat, 
which  may  itself  facilitate  the  displacement  (168). 

The  heat  thus  produced  would  migrate  both  inwards  into 
the  body  of  the  earth  and  outwards  into  space.  But,  since  the 
rate  of  dissipation  of  this  heat  is  so  extremely  slow,  it  follows 
that  displacements  at  relatively  short  intervals  might  pro- 
duce heat  more  rapidly  than  it  could  be  dissipated.  Over 
hundreds  of  millions  of  years  slight  increments  of  heat  from 
this  source  may  have  accumulated  to  produce  the  earth's 
present  temperature.  The  assumption  of  frequent  crust  dis- 
placement thus  suggests  a  third  possible  source  of  the  earth's 
heat,  in  addition  to  those  mentioned  by  Gutenberg. 

If  it  is  true,  as  Daly  thought,  that  the  heat  gradient  is 
steeper  in  North  America  than  in  Europe,  this  fact  serves 
as  additional  confirmation  of  a  displacement  of  the  earth's 
crust  at  the  end  of  the  Pleistocene.  Later  I  shall  present  evi- 
dence to  suggest  that  the  crust  moved  at  that  time  in  such 
a  direction  as  to  bring  North  America  down  from  the  pole 


THE    MOUNTAINS 

to  its  present  latitude.  If  this  occurred,  it  meant  a  displace- 
ment of  about  2,000  miles  for  eastern  North  America,  but 
of  only  about  500  miles  for  western  Europe.  Quite  obviously, 
crust  adjustments  and  resulting  friction  must  be  propor- 
tional to  the  amount  of  the  displacement,  and  therefore  fric- 
tion and  resulting  heat  could  be  expected  to  be  somewhat 
greater  in  America. 

To  return,  now,  to  our  plateau  basalts,  we  may  observe 
that,  in  a  situation  where  the  crust  of  the  earth  was  con- 
tinuously in  motion  over  an  extended  period,  a  build-up 
of  heat  in  the  crust  might  cause  considerable  melting  in  its 
lower  parts  where  the  temperature  was  already  very  close  to 
the  melting  points  of  the  rocks.  This  increase  of  heat  would 
link  itself  quite  naturally,  therefore,  to  an  increase  in  the 
number  and  intensity  of  volcanic  eruptions,  and  to  lava  flows 
of  all  kinds.  By  means  of  these  eruptions  and  flows  some  of 
the  heat  would  be  dissipated  into  the  air;  much  of  it,  how- 
ever, imprisoned  in  the  lower  part  of  the  crust,  would  simply 
increase  the  volume  of  the  molten  magmas. 

While  the  increase  of  heat  in  the  crust  would  naturally 
favor  larger  lava  flows,  another  factor  would  create  the  pos- 
sibility of  massive  flows,  or  lava  floods.  A  massive  displace- 
ment of  the  crust,  because  of  the  oblateness  of  the  earth, 
must  produce  temporary  distortions  of  its  shape,  and  of  the 
gravitational  balance  of  the  crust.  The  force  of  gravity  sub- 
sequently must  gradually  force  the  crust  to  resume  its  normal 
position.  This,  of  course,  involves  great  pressure  upon  the 
crust,  and  upon  the  molten  or  semimolten  liquid  material 
under  or  within  the  crust.  Pressures  of  this  kind  might  oc- 
casionally lead  to  the  eruption  of  plateau  basalts.  The  prob- 
able magnitude  of  the  distortions  of  the  crust  resulting  from 
displacement  will  be  considered  in  detail  later  on.  It  must 
not  be  supposed,  however,  that  every  displacement  of  the 
crust  must  inevitably  produce  lava  floods.  The  latter  would 
perhaps  be  the  result  of  an  unusual  combination  of  pressures 
and  fractures.  The  same  combination  of  forces  which  might, 
in  one  situation,  produce  volcanic  mountains  and  island  arcs 


i2o  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

might,  under  other  circumstances,  produce  a  doming  up  of 
the  crust  in  a  local  area  or  a  lava  flood. 


p.  Changing  Sea  Levels 

An  important  problem  closely  related  to  that  of  mountain 
building  is  that  of  the  cause  of  very  numerous,  and  in  some 
cases  radical,  changes  in  the  elevations  of  land  areas  rela- 
tively to  the  sea  level.  Umbgrove  finds  that  mountain  folding 
has  been  related,  in  geological  time,  with  uplift  of  land  areas, 
or  with  withdrawal  or  regression  of  the  sea  (430:93).  How- 
ever, it  is  clear  that  the  uplifts  were  not  confined  merely  to 
the  folded  areas,  that  is,  to  the  mountains  themselves,  but 
affected  large  regions.  Such  uplifts,  where  whole  sections  of 
the  earth's  crust  were  elevated  without  being  folded,  are  re- 
ferred to  as  epeirogenic  uplifts,  to  distinguish  them  from  the 
uplifts  of  the  folded  mountain  belts  which  may  have  re- 
sulted from  the  folding  itself,  and  which  are  referred  to  as 
orogenic  uplifts.  As  to  the  extent  of  the  resulting  changes  in 
sea  level,  Umbgrove  says: 

.  .  .  The  most  important  question  concerns  the  depth  to  which 
the  sea-level  was  depressed  in  distinct  periods  of  intense  regression, 
in  other  words,  the  extent  of  the  change  to  which  the  distance  be- 
tween the  surface  of  the  continents  and  the  ocean  floors  was  subjected 
during  the  pulsating  rhythm  of  subcrustal  processes.  Joly  was  the 
only  one  who  approached  this  question  from  the  geophysical  side, 
and  he  arrived  at  an  order  of  1000  meters.  .  .  .  (430:95). 

It  becomes  necessary,  therefore,  to  find  a  connection  be- 
tween the  cause  of  the  folding  of  the  crust  and  the  cause  of 
general,  or  epeirogenic,  changes  of  elevation  of  continents 
and  sea  floors.  Fortunately,  this  problem  is  not  really  so  diffi- 
cult as  it  may  seem  at  first  glance.  That  it  can  be  solved  in 
terms  of  the  assumption  of  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust 
is,  I  think,  clear  from  the  following  considerations. 

Gutenberg  has  pointed  out  that  if  a  sector  of  the  crust,  in 
gravitational  equilibrium  at  the  equator,  is  displaced  pole- 


THE    MOUNTAINS  121 

ward  by  a  shift  of  the  whole  crust,  it  will  be  moved  to  a 
latitude  where  gravity  is  greater,  because  gravity  increases 
slightly  toward  the  poles.  Its  weight  will  be  thereby  in- 
creased, and  to  remain  in  gravitational  equilibrium  it  must 
seek  a  lower  level:  it  must  subside.  The  water  level  in  the 
higher  latitude  adjusts  easily,  of  course.  Gutenberg  points  out, 
however,  that  if  the  movement  of  the  crust  occurs  at  a  rate 
greater  than  the  rate  at  which  the  sector  may  sink,  by  dis- 
placing viscous  material  from  below  itself,  the  result  will  be 
that  the  sector  will  stand  (for  a  time)  higher  relatively  to  sea 
level  than  it  did  before.  I  give  Gutenberg's  own  words: 

Movements  of  the  earth's  crust  relative  to  its  axis  must  be  accom- 
panied by  vertical  displacements.  A  block  with  a  thickness  of  50 
kilometers  in  equilibrium  near  the  equator  should  have  a  thickness 
of  49.8  near  the  poles  to  be  bounded  by  the  same  equipotential  sur- 
faces there.  If  it  moves  toward  a  pole,  it  must  sink  deeper  to  keep  in 
equilibrium.  If  the  process  is  too  fast  for  maintenance  of  isostatic 
equilibrium,  positive  gravity  anomalies  and  regressions  are  to  be  ex- 
pected. Thus  regression  may  be  an  indication  that  an  area  was  moving 
toward  a  pole,  and  transgressions  that  it  was  moving  toward  the 
equator  (194:204-05). 

According  to  Gutenberg,  an  area  moved  about  6,000  miles 
from  the  equator  to  a  pole  would  stand  about  1,200  or  1,400 
feet  higher  above  sea  level,  if  the  speed  of  the  displacement 
was  too  rapid  for  maintenance  of  gravitational  equilibrium. 
The  speed  of  displacement  that  is  suggested  by  the  evidence 
to  be  presented  later  is  such  as  to  eliminate  entirely  the 
possibility  that  the  crustal  sector  could  sink  and  remain  in 
gravitational  equilibrium.  Consequently,  by  our  theory,  a 
poleward  movement  of  any  sector  of  the  crust  will  result  in 
uplift,  and  in  regression  of  the  sea.  In  addition,  it  appears 
to  me  that  since  any  sector  displaced  poleward  would  also 
be  compressed  laterally,  this  would  offer  another  obstacle  to 
its  subsidence.  It  would  have  to  overcome  the  lateral  pres- 
sures, as  well  as  displace  underlying  material. 

The  amount  of  the  uplift  of  an  area  displaced  poleward 
would  depend,  of  course,  on  the  amount  of  the  displacement. 
As  will  be  made  clear  later,  much  geological  evidence  ap- 


122  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

pears  to  suggest  that  displacements  may  have  amounted,  on 
the  average,  to  no  more  than  a  third  of  the  distance  from  a 
pole  to  the  equator.  If  this  is  true,  then  the  resulting  uplift 
to  be  expected  should  be  of  the  order  of  about  one  third  of 
the  uplift  he  suggested,  or  from  400  to  500  feet.  We  shall  see, 
later,  how  well  this  agrees  with  the  evidence. 

There  is  another  factor  that  would  operate  in  the  same 
direction  as  the  effect  mentioned  by  Gutenberg,  to  alter  the 
elevation  of  land  areas  and  sea  bottoms.  Unlike  the  gravita- 
tional effect,  however,  this  second  factor  would  tend  to  a 
permanent  change  in  sea  levels,  and  might  therefore,  cumu- 
latively, result  in  important  changes  in  the  distribution  of 
land  and  sea.  It  is  a  question  of  the  permanent  consequences 
of  the  stretching  or  compression  of  the  crust.  As  we  have 
seen,  an  area  displaced  poleward  must  undergo  compression 
because  of  the  shortened  radius  and  circumference  of  the 
earth  in  the  higher  latitudes.  This  compression  must  result 
in  the  folding  of  rock  strata,  which  will  be  likely  to  occur 
mainly  in  areas  where  the  crust  has  already  been  weakened 
by  the  formation  of  geosynclines.  The  effect  of  the  folding 
will  be  to  pile  up  the  sedimentary  rocks  that  have  been 
formed  from  sediments  deposited  in  the  geosynclines,  caus- 
ing them  to  form  thicker  layers.  These  thicker  layers  of 
lighter  rock  will  tend,  even  after  gravitational  adjustments 
have  taken  place,  to  stand  higher  above  sea  level.  The  effect 
of  one  displacement  in  this  respect  would  be  slight,  but  the 
accumulation  of  the  effects  of  many  displacements  through 
millions  of  years  could  lead  to  extremely  important  changes 
in  the  distribution  of  land  and  sea  areas.  Numerous  displace- 
ments of  the  earth's  crust  could,  in  fact,  constitute  an  essen- 
tial, and  perhaps  even  the  basic,  mechanism  for  the  growth 
of  continents. 

Equally  important  for  the  general  question  of  sea  levels 
are  the  effects  to  be  expected  from  a  displacement  of  a  sector 
of  the  crust  toward  the  equator.  Here  the  crust  will  be  sub- 
jected to  tension,  or  stretching.  We  have  already  noted  that 
in  this  process  innumerable  fractures  will  be  created  in  the 


THE     MOUNTAINS  12$ 

crust,  and  these  will  tend  to  be  filled  up  with  magma  from 
below.  Since  this  magma,  invading  the  crust,  will  average 
higher  specific  density  than  the  rocks  of  the  crust,  it  may  in- 
crease the  general  weight  of  the  crust,  and  thus  depress  it, 
causing  a  deepening  of  the  sea.  This  would  not  occur  if  the 
separated  blocks  simply  sank  in  the  underlying  magma  until 
they  displaced  their  own  weight,  in  the  manner  suggested  by 
Campbell.  In  that  case,  the  crust  would  weigh  no  more  than 
before.  It  seems,  however,  that  volcanic  activity  is  accom- 
plished by  very  complex  chemical  processes,  and  by  the  ab- 
sorption of  vast  quantities  of  lighter  rock  and  its  transforma- 
tion chemically  into  heavier  rocks,  to  the  accompaniment 
of  much  throwing  off  of  gases  into  the  atmosphere.  It  is  also 
true,  as  we  have  noted,  that  massive  lava  flows  may  occur  on 
the  sea  bottoms  (or  even,  perhaps,  within  the  crust,  at  points 
below  the  sea  bottoms)  as  a  result  of  displacement  of  the 
crust.  These  could  have  the  effect  of  weighting  the  crust. 
Moreover,  an  equatorward  displacement  of  an  area  must 
result  in  a  gravitational  effect  opposite  to  that  of  the  pole- 
ward displacement  mentioned  by  Gutenberg.  In  this  case, 
the  crust  must  rise  to  achieve  gravitational  balance.  In  so 
doing  it  may  have  to  draw  into  itself  a  considerable  amount 
of  the  heavier  rock  underlying  the  crust.  This  obviously 
would  tend  to  weight  the  crust. 

The  foregoing  factors,  added  together,  may  account  for 
the  observed  deepening  of  the  oceans,  and  the  increase  of 
their  total  surface  area,  from  the  poles  to  the  equator.  A 
careful  survey  indicates  that  this  deepening  is  on  the  order 
of  one  kilometer  or,  perhaps,  4,000  feet  (233). 

There  is  still  another  factor  that  may  affect  sea  levels, 
but  in  an  unpredictable  way.  It  seems  clear,  for  several  rea- 
sons, that  a  displacement  of  the  earth's  whole  crust  must 
result  in  considerable  readjustments  and  redistribution  of 
materials  of  different  densities  on  the  underside  of  the  crust. 
While  these  can  hardly  be  predicted,  they  must  affect  the 
elevation  of  points  at  the  earth's  surface. 

Geologists  believe  that  the  underside  of  the  crust  has  un- 


124  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

evennesses,  corresponding  to  those  at  the  surface,  and  that 
the  crust  varies  considerably  in  thickness  from  place  to  place. 
They  think,  for  example,  that  the  crust  is  thicker  under  the 
continental  surfaces,  and  thinner  under  the  oceans,  and  that 
it  is  thickest  of  all  under  mountain  ranges  and  high  plateaus. 
Continents  and  mountain  ranges  not  only  stick  up  higher 
but  they  also  stick  down  deeper.  That  is  because  they  are 
composed,  as  an  average,  of  lighter  rock.  The  analogy  is  to 
an  iceberg.  An  iceberg  floats  with  one  tenth  of  its  mass  above 
sea  level,  and  nine  tenths  of  it  submerged.  It  is  lighter  than 
water  per  unit  volume,  and  floats  in  the  water  displacing  its 
own  weight,  and  leaving  its  own  excess  volume  above  the 
surface.  Continents  and  mountain  chains,  composed  on 
the  average  of  lighter  rock,  stand  in  the  same  sort  of  hydro- 
static, gravitational  balance,  and  their  downward  projections 
are  thought  to  be  much  greater  than  their  upward,  visible 
projections.  The  downward  projections  of  mountain  chains 
are  called  "mountain  roots." 

The  underside  of  the  crust,  then,  has  a  sort  of  negative 
geography.  The  features  of  the  upper  surface  are  repeated  in 
reverse  on  the  undersurface,  although,  naturally,  the  details 
are  missing.  The  effects  are  rather  smoothed  out.  We  should 
expect  that  the  Rocky  Mountains  would  make  a  sizable 
bump  on  the  underside  of  the  crust,  but  we  couldn't  expect 
to  find  any  small,  sharp  bump  just  under  Pikes  Peak.  The 
tensile  strength  of  the  crust,  though  limited,  is  sufficient  to 
smooth  out  the  minor  features. 

As  we  attempt  to  envisage  the  situation  at  the  bottom  of 
the  crust,  we  must  remember  that  the  rocks  are  subjected  to 
increasing  pressure  with  depth,  and  probably  to  increasing 
heat,  and  as  a  consequence  they  must  tend  to  lose  their  rigid- 
ity and  strength.  We  don't  just  come  suddenly  to  the  bound- 
ary of  the  crust  at  a  given  depth.  On  the  contrary,  the  crust 
just  fades  away.  The  rocks  of  the  lowest  part  of  the  crust 
must  be  very  weak  indeed,  so  that  a  very  slight  lateral  pres- 
sure may  suffice  to  displace  them. 


THE    MOUNTAINS  125 

It  follows  that  when  lateral  pressures  develop  during  a 
displacement  of  the  crust,  as  the  downward  projections  of 
continents  and  mountains  are  brought  to  bear  against  the  up- 
ward extension  of  the  viscous  layer  below  the  ocean  base- 
ments, large  blobs  of  this  soft  rock  of  lesser  density  will  be 
detached  from  the  undersides  of  the  continents,  or  mountain 
ranges,  and  will  get  shifted  to  other  places.  If,  as  a  result  of 
this  shifting  around,  the  average  densities  of  vertical  columns 
extending  from  the  bottom  to  the  top  of  the  crust  get 
changed,  then  there  will  eventually  be  corresponding  changes 
of  elevation  at  the  surface.  Some  areas  might,  as  a  result,  tend 
to  rise,  and  others  to  sink.  This  could  account,  naturally,  for 
changes  of  sea  level,  and  for  many  topographical  features 
such  as  basins  and  plateaus. 

To  sum  up  the  question  of  sea  levels,  it  appears  that  the 
assumption  of  displacements  of  the  crust  (especially  if  they 
are  considered  to  have  been  numerous)  may  help  to  explain 
them.  It  seems  able  to  explain  why  glaciated  areas  (which 
we  consider  to  have  been  areas  displaced  poleward)  appear 
to  have  stood  higher  relatively  to  sea  level,  and  why  periods 
of  warm  climate  in  particular  regions  appear  to  have  been 
associated  with  reduced  elevation  of  the  land,  and  transgres- 
sions of  the  sea.  The  theory  seems  to  satisfy  Umbgrove's 
conclusion  that  sea-level  changes  have  resulted  from  some 
"world-embracing  cause"  (430:93).  It  accounts,  too,  for 
Bucher's  suggestion  that  regressions  of  the  sea  have  resulted 
from  subcrustal  expansion,  and  transgressions  from  sub- 
crustal  contraction,  for  this,  obviously,  is  only  another  way 
of  looking  at  a  displacement  of  the  crust  (58:479).  (If  an  area 
is  displaced  poleward,  the  effect  of  subcrustal  contraction  is 
created;  if  it  is  displaced  equatorward,  the  effect  of  subcrustal 
expansion  occurs.)  At  the  same  time  it  provides  an  explana- 
tion for  the  rhythmic  changes  of  sea  levels  through  geological 
history  that  so  mystified  Grabau: 

This  rhythmic  succession  and  essential  simultaneousness  of  the 
transgressions  as  well  as  the  regressions  in  all  the  continents,  indicates 


126  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

a  periodic  rise  and  fall  of  the  sea-level,  a  slow  pulsatory  movement, 
due  apparently  to  alternate  swelling  and  contraction  of  the  sea- 
bottom  (183). 


jo.  Some  Light  from  Mars 

Some  very  significant  facts  emerge  from  recent  studies  of 
other  members  of  the  solar  system,  especially  from  the  work 
of  Dr.  Harold  Urey,  The  Planets:  Their  Origin  and  Develop- 
ment (438).  This  is  the  work  in  which  the  theory  of  accretion 
of  planets  is  developed,  in  contradiction  to  the  older  theory 
of  the  cooling  globe.  Dr.  Urey  also  discusses  the  present  state  of 
knowledge  regarding  the  structure  of  the  moon  and  Mars. 

It  appears  that  there  are  mountains  on  the  moon,  but  in 
Dr.  Urey's  opinion  these  have  been  created  by  collisions  with 
minor  celestial  bodies.  Where  the  colliding  body  hit  the 
moon  more  or  less  head  on,  craters  (the  largest  more  than  100 
miles  across)  were  formed.  Planetesimals  that  merely  grazed 
the  moon's  surface  left  long  ridges  and  valleys.  Where  the 
heat  created  by  the  impacts  caused  extensive  rock  melting, 
vast  lava  floods  apparently  took  place,  which  cooled  off,  in 
tens  or  hundreds  of  thousands  of  years.  The  absence  of  air 
and  water  has  resulted  in  an  absence  of  erosion  on  the  moon's 
surface,  so  that  the  features  created  by  the  collisions  have 
not  been  obliterated  except  in  cases  where  the  lava  flows  have 
swamped  them. 

In  the  case  of  Mars,  the  story  is  different.  Urey  assumes 
that  Mars  was  once  like  the  moon,  both  in  size  and  in  surface 
features.  The  removal  of  these  features,  which  no  longer 
exist,  he  thinks  must  have  been  due  to  the  work  of  atmos- 
phere and  water.  He  gives  reasons  for  believing  that  Mars 
did  have  more  water  at  one  time,  but  that  it  escaped  from 
the  planet  by  a  process  that  is  also  going  on,  more  slowly,  on 
earth.  He  states: 

.  .  .  The  surface  appears  to  be  smooth,  a  condition  most  easily 
explained  as  due  to  the  action  of  water  during  its  early  history  and 
no  mountain  building  since  then  (438:65). 


THE    MOUNTAINS  127 

In  another  place  he  says: 

.  .  .  Mars  appears  to  have  no  high  mountains,  and  it  is  difficult  to 
understand  this  unless  it  had  some  initial  water.  (In  order  for  it  to 
remain  without  mountains  no  folded  mountains  must  have  been 
formed  subsequently;  but  this  is  another  subject.)  The  formation  of 
Mars  and  its  surface  followed  a  course  similar  to  that  of  the  earth 


So  we  see  that  Mars  and  the  earth  appear  to  have  followed 
similar  courses  of  development.  They  are  similar  in  chemical 
composition  and  in  structure,  and  have  similar  atmospheres. 
There  are,  apparently,  only  two  important  points  of  differ- 
ence, other  than  size.  Mars,  unlike  the  earth,  has  very  little 
water,  so  that  its  polar  icecaps  are  thought  to  be  no  deeper 
than  hoarfrost,  and  disappear  entirely  in  summer;  and  Mars, 
unlike  the  earth,  has  no  folded  mountains. 

A  thought-provoking  fact:  on  Mars,  no  great  icecaps-—  and 
no  folded  mountains,  no  volcanic  phenomena,  no  fault 
mountains!  Surely  this  is  no  coincidence.  Surely,  it  is  sugges- 
tive of  the  fact  that  these  features  on  earth  have  been  the 
consequence  of  displacements  of  the  crust,  and  that  these  dis- 
placements have  been  owing  to  the  agency  of  great  polar  ice- 
caps. It  might  seem,  at  first  glance,  that  the  absence  of  folded 
mountains  on  Mars  might  be  explained  by  the  absence  of 
deep  accumulations  of  sediments  produced  by  the  weather- 
ing of  rocks  under  the  action  of  water,  and  the  accumulation 
of  these  sediments  in  geosynclines  with  subsequent  folding, 
but  we  have  seen  that  geologists  do  not  claim  to  explain  the 
original  creation  of  the  geosynclines,  nor  to  identify  the  source 
of  the  compressive  stress  that  brings  about  mountain  folding. 


ii.  Undisturbed  Sections  of  the  Crust 

It  has  been  objected  that  over  extensive  areas  there  are  rock 
formations  that  appear  to  have  been  little  disturbed  over 
very  great  periods  of  time.  If  the  crust  has  been  displaced 


128  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

as  often  as  is  required  by  this  theory,  why  would  not  the  crust 
be  universally  folded  to  a  far  greater  extent  than  it  is? 

I  think  this  objection  has  been  partly  answered  where  I 
pointed  out  that  in  a  single  displacement  of  the  crust  the 
folding  would  be  comparatively  slight,  and  that  it  would  be 
confined  to  a  small  part  of  the  earth's  entire  surface.  I  have 
suggested  that  it  would  be  greatest  along  the  meridian  of  the 
crust's  maximum  displacement,  but  that  at  some  point  be- 
tween this  meridian  and  the  two  areas  suffering  no  displace- 
ment, the  compressions  would  tend  to  fall  below  the  elastic 
limit  of  the  crustal  rocks,  so  that  the  crust  would  simply  bend 
elastically,  and  then  return  to  its  original,  apparently  undis- 
turbed position,  in  some  subsequent  movement.  It  may  be 
added  that  most  of  the  changes  of  elevation  resulting  from  a 
displacement  of  the  crust  would  tend  to  be  epeirogenic— that 
is,  they  would  be  broad  uplifts  or  subsidences  of  large  regions 
resulting  from  the  tilting  of  great  segments  of  the  crust, 
rather  than  merely  local  deformations  of  the  rock  structures. 

Another  point  that  may  be  urged  in  answer  to  this  objec- 
tion is  that,  apparently,  over  considerable  periods  the  poles 
have  tended  to  be  situated  again  and  again  in  approximately 
the  same  areas,  possibly  owing  to  the  configuration  of  the 
continents.  This  would  result  in  leaving  some  areas  far  re- 
moved for  long  periods  from  the  meridian  of  maximum  dis- 
placement of  the  crust. 


12.  The  Chronology  of  Mountain  Building 

Another  objection  that  may  be  raised  to  this  theory  of 
mountain  building  is  that  there  are  supposed  to  have  been 
only  a  few  great  mountain-making  epochs  in  the  world's  his- 
tory of  two  or  more  billion  years,  and  that  these  epochs  have 
been  separated  by  very  long  periods  when  mountains  were 
eroded  away,  and  no  new  ones  made.  I  shall  indicate  two 
reasons  for  holding  that  this  concept  is  an  illusion. 
The  first  reason  is  that  the  record  of  the  rocks  is  incom- 


THE    MOUNTAINS  12Q 

plete.  It  has  been  estimated  that  if  all  the  sedimentary  beds 
of  all  geological  periods  were  added  together  (that  is,  the  en- 
tire amount  of  sediment  that  has  been  weathered  out  of  the 
mountains  and  continents  and  accumulated  to  make  sedi- 
mentary rocks  since  the  beginning  of  geological  time),  the 
total  thickness  of  sediment  would  be  about  eighty  miles.  At 
the  present  time,  however,  the  average  thickness  of  the  sedi- 
mentary rocks  of  the  upper  part  of  the  earth's  crust  is  esti- 
mated to  be  no  more  than  a  mile  and  a  half  (333).  What  has 
happened  to  all  the  missing  sediment?  The  answer  is  that  it 
has  been  used  over  again.  At  the  present  time,  all  over  the 
earth,  the  forces  of  the  weather  and  the  sea  are  busy  wearing 
away  or  grinding  up  rock,  and  most  of  the  rock  they  are 
destroying  is  sedimentary  rock.  Thus  more  than  95  per  cent 
of  all  the  sedimentary  rocks  formed  since  the  beginning  of 
the  planet  has  been  destroyed.  As  a  result  of  this,  geologists 
have  been  forced  to  piece  together  this  geological  record 
from  widely  separated  beds.  They  find  a  part  of  the  Silurian 
sediment  in  the  United  States,  and  another  part  in  Africa, 
and  so  on. 

The  enormous  difficulty  of  piecing  together  the  geological 
record  from  these  discontinuous  and  scattered  beds  is  ren- 
dered even  greater  by  the  fact  that  vast  areas  of  what  were 
once  lands  are  now  under  the  shallow  epicontinental  seas, 
and  even  under  the  deep  sea  (as  we  shall  see  in  the  next 
chapter).  Let  us  remember,  too,  that  even  among  the  still- 
existing  beds  now  to  be  found  on  the  lands,  only  a  tiny 
percentage  are  at  or  near  the  surface  and  thus  available  for 
study.  And  of  these  a  large  proportion  are  in  such  remote 
and  geologically  unexplored  areas  as  Mexico,  the  Amazon, 
and  Central  Asia.  And  still,  despite  these  enormous  handi- 
caps, new  periods  of  mountain  formation  are  constantly  be- 
ing discovered.  Umbgrove  remarks  that  a  long  list  of  them 
has  been  "gradually  disclosed  to  us"  (430:27).  It  seems  to  me 
that  there  is  unjustifiable  complacency  in  the  assumption 
that  the  list  of  mountain-forming  epochs  is  now  complete. 


130  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

How  can  we  reach  a  reasonable  guess  as  to  the  number  that 
remain  undiscovered? 

The  second  reason  for  holding  that  the  idea  of  rare  moun- 
tain-building periods  is  quite  illusory  is  perhaps  even  more 
persuasive.  It  seems  that  a  remarkable  error  has  vitiated  the 
interpretation  of  the  evidence  regarding  these  alleged  pe- 
riods. The  error  has  been  exposed  by  the  development  of 
nuclear  methods  of  dating  recent  geological  events,  already 
referred  to,  and  to  be  discussed  more  fully  later.  These  have 
revealed  an  unexpectedly  rapid  rate  of  geological  change. 
The  error,  I  think,  consists  in  interpreting  the  geological 
evidence  on  the  assumption  that  conditions  as  revealed  in  a 
particular  deposit  in  one  area  necessarily  determine  world- 
wide conditions.  Thus,  evidence  of  an  ice  age  in  a  particular 
deposit  in  one  place  has  been  interpreted  as  meaning  a  period 
of  lowered  temperature  for  the  whole  world  at  that  time.  In 
the  same  way,  mountain-building  revolutions  were  assumed 
to  affect  all  parts  of  the  world  at  once.  The  idea  that  moun- 
tain building  might  go  on  on  one  continent  while  another 
went  scot-free  was  not  entertained. 

The  contemporaneousness  of  these  events  in  different  parts 
of  the  world  rested,  as  we  shall  see,  upon  a  very  vague  idea  of 
geological  time.  The  techniques  for  dating  the  older  geo- 
logical formations  never  did,  and  do  not  now,  allow  reliable 
conclusions  regarding  the  contemporaneousness  of  moun- 
tain building  on  different  continents  any  more  than  they 
permit  such  conclusions  regarding  climatic  changes.  Margins 
of  error  amounting  to  millions  of  years  must  always  be  al- 
lowed. Triassic  folding  in  India  need  not  be  contemporary 
with  Triassic  folding  in  North  America,  because  the  Triassic 
Period  is  estimated  to  have  lasted  about  35,000,000  years! 
Calculations  of  the  rates  at  which  the  weather  wears  away 
mountains  have  shown  that  mountain  ranges  may  be  worn 
away  in  much  less  time  than  that. 

Thus,  we  cannot  place  reliance  on  the  accepted  notions  of 
the  occurrence  of  mountain-building  revolutions  in  time  and 
space,  but  must  hold  that  the  process  was,  in  all  probability, 


THE    MOUNTAINS  1J1 

much  more  continuous  than  has  been  supposed,  but  confined 
to  smaller  parts  of  the  earth's  surface  at  any  one  time.  Further 
support  for  this  view  is  provided  by  the  geologist  Stokes,  who 
remarks,  in  connection  with  the  history  of  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains: 

Although  the  Rocky  Mountain  or  Laramide  Revolution  is  popu- 
larly supposed  to  have  occurred  at  the  transition  from  the  Cretaceous 
to  the  Tertiary,  it  has  become  increasingly  evident  that  mountain 
building  was  continuous  from  place  to  place  from  the  late  Jurassic  or 
early  Cretaceous  and  that  deformation  continued  through  the  early 
Tertiary  and  Quaternary  (405:819). 

In  other  words,  mountain  building  went  on  continuously  in 
North  America  from  the  Jurassic  Period,  about  100,000,000 
years  ago,  into  the  Pleistocene  Epoch,  which  is  considered  to 
have  come  to  an  end  10,000  years  ago!  This  is  excellent  evi- 
dence in  support  of  the  conclusion  that,  in  all  probability, 
none  of  the  alleged  mountain-building  revolutions  occurred 
in  widely  separated  periods,  with  long,  quiet  periods  in  be- 
tween. 

Krumbein  and  Sloss  point  out  that  this  view  is,  in  fact,  be- 
coming widely  accepted  by  geologists.  They  remark  that 
"Gilluly  .  .  .  recently  examined  the  evidence  for  and  against 
periodic  diastrophic  disturbances,  and  he  showed  that  such 
disturbances  are  much  more  nearly  continuous  through  time 
than  is  generally  supposed,"  and  they  conclude: 

Added  complexity  arises  as  additional  stratigraphic  studies  afford 
data  which  imply  that  tectonic  activity  is  continuous  through  time. 
The  classical  concept  that  a  geological  period  represents  a  long  in- 
terval of  quiescence  closed  by  diastrophic  disturbances  is  not  fully 
supported  by  these  newer  data  (258:343). 


V  :  CONTINENTS  AND  OCEAN  BASINS 


i.  The  Central  Problem 

None  of  the  mysteries  of  the  earth  is  more  baffling  than  the 
question  of  the  origin  and  history  of  the  continents  and  ocean 
basins.  One  of  the  most  useful  applications  of  the  theory  of 
crust  displacements  will  be  its  application  here. 

As  with  the  problems  already  considered,  there  are  many 
theories  that  are  in  violent  conflict.  The  conflict  is  broad  and 
deep,  and  since  it  involves  two  or  three  branches  of  science, 
which  have  adopted  antagonistic  points  of  view,  it  may  even 
be  called  a  civil  war  in  science.  It  is  fought  over  one  issue: 
whether  the  present  continents  and  deep  ocean  basins  have 
been  permanent  features  of  the  earth's  crust  since  the  forma- 
tion of  the  planet,  or  whether  they  have  not. 

It  would  take  too  long  to  review  the  history  of  this  war,  for 
it  extends  far  back  into  the  nineteenth  century.  Instead,  it 
will  suffice  to  outline  the  principal  positions  adopted  by  the 
antagonists.  Before  we  do  this,  however,  it  is  essential  to 
emphasize  that  most  contemporary  geologists,  knowing  the 
mystery  surrounding  these  principal  features  of  the  earth's 
surface,  have  refrained  from  making  very  positive  statements. 
Professor  Daly,  for  example,  after  admitting  that  the  forma- 
tion of  continents  could  not  be  accounted  for  under  the 
theory  of  the  solidification  of  the  crust  from  an  originally 
molten  state,  remarked  that 

We  are  now  face  to  face  with  a  principal  mystery  of  nature.  Ac- 
tually, the  earth's  substance  is  differentiated  into  the  form  of  conti- 
nent overlooking  deep  ocean  basin.  That  obvious,  infinitely  important 
fact,  dry  land  on  a  continental  scale,  has  to  find  its  place  in  any  theory 
of  the  earth.  The  problem  is  as  difficult  as  it  is  fundamental.  .  .  . 


Daly  goes  on  to  say  that  all  he  is  able  to  offer  on  the  subject 
is  a  guess,  but  that  any  reasonable  guess  is  better  than  simply 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  1J3 

avoiding  the  issue,  which,  he  observes,  is  the  course  too  often 
taken. 

Daly's  own  guess  will  not  do  for  us,  because  it  is  based  both 
on  the  theory  of  an  originally  molten  globe  and  on  the  theory 
of  drifting  continents.  He  suggests  that  when  the  earth  was 
entirely  molten,  the  lighter  rock,  which  now  forms  the  gra- 
nitic foundations  of  the  continents,  was  floating  on  top  of 
the  heavier  rock,  of  basaltic  composition,  and  crystallized 
first,  making  a  thin  layer  over  the  planet's  whole  surface. 
Then,  for  some  reason  (not  entirely  clear)  all  this  lighter 
rock  slid  toward  one  hemisphere  and  piled  up,  making  a 
supercontinent.  Later  this  supercontinent  broke  up  and 
drifted  apart,  as  suggested  by  Wegener. 

Jeffreys  also  refers  to  the  difference  between  the  aver- 
age chemical  composition  of  the  continents  and  that  of  the 
ocean  floors.  There  is  a  difference  in  the  densities  of  the  two 
kinds  of  rock,  and  this  is  the  reason  why  the  continents  stand 
high  and  the  ocean  beds  are  low.  But  what  brought  about 
this  difference  of  composition  is  itself  unexplained.  It  is,  says 
Jeffreys, 

.  .  .  closely  connected  with  the  great  problem  of  the  origin  of  the 
division  of  the  earth's  surface  into  continents  and  ocean  basins,  which 
has  not  yet  received  any  convincing  explanation  (239:159). 

Professor  Umbgrove  also  has  admitted  that  the  field  is 
wide  open  to  any  reasonable  speculation.  He  feels  that  he 
is  confined  to  mere  guessing,  but  justifies  what  he  writes 
thus: 

.  .  .  But  why  should  we  not  enter  [this  field]  if  everyone  who  wants 
to  join  us  in  our  geopoetic  expedition  into  the  unknown  realm  of  the 
earth's  early  infancy  is  warned  at  the  beginning  that  probably  not  a 
single  step  can  be  placed  on  solid  ground?  (430:241). 

In  view  of  this  state  of  affairs,  I  shall  not  apologize  if,  at 
times,  in  the  course  of  this  and  the  following  chapter,  I  shall 
seem  to  the  reader  to  be  venturing  beyond  the  point  where 
speculation  can  be  immediately  checked  by  the  facts.  To  a 
certain  extent,  my  suggestions  will  be  simply  logical  deduc- 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

tions  from  the  general  theory  of  crust  displacements,  and 
may  be  incapable,  at  least  at  this  stage,  of  direct  proof. 


2.  The  Views  of  the  Geophysicists 

In  this  civil  war  between  the  sciences,  the  first  group  I  shall 
call  upon  to  present  their  side  of  the  case  are  the  geophysi- 
cists. Now  the  geophysicists,  by  and  large,  have  very  definite 
views  about  the  continents,  even  though  they  cannot  explain 
their  origin.  Their  consensus  is  that  the  continents  have  been 
permanent  features  of  the  earth's  crust  from  the  "beginning," 
and  this  involves  an  equal  permanence  for  the  ocean  basins. 
Changes  of  sea  level  there  have  been:  so  much  cannot  be  de- 
nied; but  according  to  the  geophysicists  these  can  have  been 
only  relatively  important.  At  times  the  continental  shelves 
(the  narrow  strips  along  the  coasts  where  the  water  is  only  a 
few  hundred  feet  deep)  have  been  laid  bare,  and  at  other 
times  the  oceans  have  invaded  the  low  parts  of  the  conti- 
nents, but  such  changes  (while  unexplained)  have  been 
slight;  they  have  not  affected  the  main  masses  of  the  conti- 
nents. The  continents,  then,  are  original  features  dating,  in 
their  present  positions,  from  the  unknown  beginnings  of  the 
planet. 

Of  course,  geophysicists  would  never  make  such  broad 
statements  as  these,  unless  they  had  what  seemed  to  them 
sufficient  evidence.  Their  argument  is  easily  stated.  They 
point  to  the  differences  in  composition.  The  continental  rock 
is  less  dense,  on  the  average,  than  the  rock  under  the  oceans. 
The  force  of  gravitation  brings  all  sectors  of  the  earth's  crust 
into  rough  balance,  and  this  means  that  the  lighter  parts  will 
stick  up  higher,  like  pieces  of  wood  or  ice  floating  on  water. 
The  continental  sectors  of  the  crust  are  considered  to  be  both 
lighter  and  thicker  than  the  oceanic  sectors.  The  greater 
thickness  makes  up  for  the  less  density,  so  that  things  bal- 
ance off. 

This  principle  of  the  gravitational  balance  of  the  crust  is 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  135 

referred  to  as  the  principle  of  "isostasy."  We  shall  see,  later, 
that  there  are  some  serious  difficulties  with  the  general  theory 
of  isostasy,  as  a  consequence  of  which  it  cannot  be  regarded 
as  definitely  established.  Still,  on  the  whole,  there  is  much  to 
be  said  for  it.  And  so  the  geophysicists  ask  how  can  anything 
alter  the  major  concentrations  of  lighter  or  heavier  rock, 
which,  according  to  the  theory  of  isostasy,  must  determine 
the  locations  of  continents  and  ocean  basins?  A  continent 
could  not  be  destroyed  without  getting  rid  of  a  large  amount 
of  lighter  granitic  and  sedimentary  rock,  and  a  new  conti- 
nent could  not  be  raised  up  without  producing  a  vast  amount 
of  new  rock  of  that  kind.  Since  these  things  are  impossible, 
changing  continents  around  is  impossible,  and  the  less  said 
about  it  the  better. 


3.  The  Views  of  the  Biologists 

While  the  geophysicists  were  developing  these  ideas,  based 
upon  laboratory  experiments  and  principles  of  physics,  the 
biologists  and  paleontologists  were  busily  engaged  with  an 
entirely  different  question,  which  led  them  to  diametrically 
opposite  conclusions.  They  were  classifying  and  comparing 
plants  and  animals  from  all  parts  of  the  world,  those  living 
today  and  those  that  lived  in  ages  past.  They  were  soon  con- 
fronted by  the  fact  that  in  many  cases  the  same  species  of 
plants  and  animals  could  be  found  on  lands  separated  by 
whole  oceans.  How  was  this  to  be  explained?  It  could  not 
be  maintained  that  all  these  forms  of  life— snails,  grasshop- 
pers, ferns,  fresh-water  fish,  and  elephants— had  all  built 
rafts,  like  Kon~tiki,  in  which  to  cross  the  Pacific.  Nor  was  it 
possible  to  explain  the  distribution  of  all  sorts  of  species  by 
means  of  ocean  currents,  migratory  birds,  or  winds.  Behring 
Strait  would  not  do  either,  because  the  plants  and  animals 
of  the  warm  climates  could  hardly  be  tempted  to  chance  the 
rigors  of  the  Arctic  merely  to  reach  America  or  to  escape 
from  it. 


136  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

As  we  have  seen,  when  the  paleontologists  studied  the  life 
of  the  remote  past  they  found  the  same  thing.  The  distribu- 
tions of  the  fossil  plants  and  animals  did  not  seem  to  pay 
any  attention  to  the  present  shapes  or  positions  of  the  conti- 
nents. Therefore,  not  knowing  what  the  geophysicists  were 
up  to— or  not  caring— the  biologists  and  paleontologists  de- 
cided between  themselves  that  they  were  in  need  of  some  new 
continents,  or  rather,  in  need  of  some  old,  now  nonexistent 
continents,  or  at  least  a  large  number  of  former  land  con- 
nections across  the  present  oceans.  And  so  they  went  right 
ahead,  and  invented  them. 

Wegener,  of  course,  managed  to  explain  a  mass  of  evidence 
by  moving  the  continents  (450:73-89).  Since  the  refutation 
of  his  theory,  the  same  evidence  needs  a  new  explanation. 
Dodson  gave  the  evidence  for  a  North  Pacific  land  bridge 
(not  Behring  Strait)  based  on  the  distributions  of  156  genera 
of  plants  (115:373).  Gregory  also  produced  evidence  for  a 
Pacific  land  bridge  (191).  DeRance  and  Feilden  presented  the 
evidence  for  a  land  connection  between  North  America  and 
Europe  in  the  early  Carboniferous  (319:!!,  331-32).  Cole- 
man,  basing  himself  no  doubt  on  paleontological  evidence, 
remarked  that  "India  has  many  times  been  connected  with 
Africa"  (87:262). 

Dodson  reconstructed  the  history  of  the  Isthmus  of  Pan- 
ama, as  indicated  by  the  distributions  of  fossil  plants  and 
animals.  According  to  him,  North  and  South  America  were 
connected  in  the  Cretaceous  and  in  the  early  Paleocene,  but 
later  in  the  Paleocene,  Panama  was  completely  submerged. 
During  the  following  Eocene  and  Oligocene  there  were  islands 
but  no  continuous  land  in  the  area.  The  islands  were  com- 
pletely submerged  late  in  the  Oligocene.  Land  connection 
between  the  continents  was  re-established  in  the  Pliocene, 
that  is,  very  lately  (115:375-76).  It  must  be  emphasized  that 
the  explanation  for  all  these  land  changes  is  missing.  There 
is  no  basis  in  the  geological  evidence  for  the  assumption  that 
the  isthmus  was  never  more  than  just  barely  submerged. 
There  is  no  reason  to  exclude  the  possibility  that  it  was  rather 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  137 

deeply  submerged  at  times.  Later  I  shall  show  that  the  prob- 
lem cannot  be  solved  by  any  theory  that  the  melting  of  ice- 
caps in  "interglacial  periods"  periodically  raised  the  water 
level. 

One  writer,  who  is  considered  a  very  special  authority  on 
the  climates  of  the  past,  Dr.  C.  E.  P.  Brooks,  gave  a  list  of 
continents  that  must  have  existed  about  300,000,000  years 
ago,  if  the  distribution  of  plants  and  animals  at  that  time  is 
to  be  explained.  He  even  names  them  (52:247-51): 

a.  Nearctis,  a  "primitive  North  American  continent/' 

b.  North  Atlantis,  including  Greenland  and  western  Eu- 
rope. 

c.  Angaraland,  occupying  part  of  the  present  Siberia. 

d.  Gondwanaland,  a  huge  continent  extending  from  South 
America  to  India  via  South  Africa. 

He  states,  further,  that  the  evidence  shows  that  Nearctis 
and  North  Atlantis  were  connected  by  a  land  bridge  at  about 
Lat.  50°  N.,  and  that  the  first  three  continents  were  separated 
from  Gondwanaland  by  a  great  ocean,  the  Tethys  Sea,  which 
extended  from  New  Guinea  to  Central  America.  Another 
authority,  Beno  Gutenberg,  writes: 

.  .  .  Nearly  all  specialists  on  such  problems  conclude  that  during 
certain  p  re-Tertiary  periods  land  connections  existed  across  sections 
of  the  present  Atlantic  and  Indian  Oceans.  .  .  .  During  certain  geo- 
logical periods  land  life  was  able  to  roam  from  land  to  land;  on  the 
other  hand,  such  former  connections  of  continental  areas  prevented 
sea  life  from  moving  from  one  part  of  the  Atlantic  to  another  (194: 
208-09). 

Gutenberg  thus  bears  witness  to  the  fact  that  the  sea  lif< 
as  well  as  the  land  life  of  the  past  supports  the  idea  of  im 
portant  changes  in  the  positions  of  land  masses. 

We  can  see  that  the  suggestions  advanced  are  of  two  kinds: 
sunken  continents,  and  changing  land  bridges  between  conti- 
nents. Land  bridges,  of  course,  are  more  easily  explained 
than  sunken  continents.  However,  we  shall  see  that,  for  a 
number  of  reasons,  they  will  not  suffice  of  themselves.  There 


138  *  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

is  evidence  that  points  insistently  to  the  former  existence  o£ 
whole  continents  in  what  are  now  oceanic  areas.  Only  re- 
cently, for  example,  Dr.  Albert  C.  Smith,  of  the  Smithsonian 
Institution,  concluded,  from  a  massive  study  of  the  plants  of 
the  islands  of  the  Southwestern  Pacific,  that  the  islands  must 
be  merely  the  remnants  of  an  ancient  Melanesian  continent 
that  broke  up  about  10,000,000  or  20,000,000  years  ago  (397). 
We  shall  see  that  there  is  plenty  of  evidence,  besides  the  evi- 
dence of  fossils,  to  support  his  conclusion. 

From  what  has  been  said  about  mountain  formation,  I 
think  it  is  clear  that  the  matter  of  the  appearance  and  disap- 
pearance of  land  bridges  is  accounted  for  at  the  same  time  that 
the  mountain  ranges  are  accounted  for.  A  displacement  of 
the  crust  will  lead  to  the  uplift  of  long,  narrow,  folded  tracts 
on  the  sea  bottom  as  well  as  on  land.  One  of  these,  coming 
into  existence  on  the  bottom  of  a  shallow  sea  between  two 
major  land  masses,  could  connect  such  land  masses  and  con- 
stitute a  land  bridge.  Its  subsidence  in  a  later  movement  of 
the  crust  could  separate  the  land  masses,  and  the  subsidence 
could  be  partial,  leaving  islands,  or  total. 

It  is  interesting  to  see  that  Umbgrove  found  himself  com- 
pelled, because  of  a  mass  of  geological  evidence,  to  support 
a  theory  of  rapidly  appearing  and  disappearing  land  bridges, 
which  was  advanced  by  Willis  and  Nolke,  though  he  ad- 
mitted that  * 'Their  origin  and  submersion  will  probably  re- 
main a  mystery  for  some  time  to  come.  .  .  ."  (430:238). 

Land  bridges  have  been  very  convenient  for  many  sci- 
entists seeking  to  avoid  the  horrid  alternative  of  former 
continents.  According  to  the  picture  drawn  by  some  writers, 
these  bridges  were  long  snakelike  arms,  wriggling  out  this 
way  and  that,  which  just  happened  to  make  the  right  connec- 
tions between  the  right  continents  at  the  right  times  for  the 
convenience  of  the  right  plants  and  animals.  Often  when  the 
threat  of  a  former  continent  loomed  so  imminently  that  its 
avoidance  seemed  hopeless,  a  land  bridge  would  save  the  day. 
Most  paleontologists  were  satisfied  with  land  bridges,  and  did 
not  insist  on  sunken  continents,  but  some  could  not  help 


CONTINENTS     AND     OCEAN     BASINS  13 

feeling  that  there  was  something  artificial  about  the  idea 
they  therefore  continued  to  speculate  about  former  conti 
nents. 

Should  you  ask,  How  did  all  this  activity  on  the  part  o 
the  biologists  and  paleontologists  strike  the  geophysicists 
I  can  answer  that  it  did  not  strike  them  at  all.  This  can  b< 
explained  partly  by  the  fact  that  geophysicists  generally  d< 
not  read  books  on  paleontology,  and  vice  versa.  So  far  as  tin 
geophysicists  were  concerned,  the  speculations  of  the  paleon 
tologists  could  be  discounted  as  the  insubstantial  imagining 
of  persons  unacquainted  with  geophysics.  To  study  the  bio 
logical  literature  allegedly  supporting  these  speculations  was 
of  course,  not  the  function  of  geophysicists.  It  was  outsid< 
their  field,  and,  moreover,  beyond  their  competence.  Th< 
connection  between  these  sciences  was  a  distant  one.  The  re 
lations  between  them  were  cool,  to  say  the  least. 


4.  Geologists  Allied  with  Biologists 

It  would  have  been  a  sad  thing  for  the  biologists  and  paleon 
tologists  had  they  not  been  able  to  find  allies  in  the  sever< 
struggle  in  which  they  were  engaged  (without,  for  the  mos 
part,  being  aware  of  it).  But  find  allies  they  did.  For  it  soor 
developed  that  the  geologists  would  not  be  content  with  th< 
limitations  on  continental  change  imposed  by  the  geophysi 
cists.  They  could  not  be  satisfied  with  land  bridges.  Fron 
purely  geological  studies  of  the  stratified  rocks  of  many  land 
throughout  the  world  came  quantities  of  evidence  insistently 
suggesting  that  the  continents  and  ocean  basins  could  no 
have  had  the  permanence  demanded  by  existing  concepts  ir 
geophysics. 

To  begin  with,  there  is  an  extraordinary  contradiction  ir 
the  very  fact  that,  while  continents  are  supposed  to  have  beer 
permanent,  nearly  all  the  sedimentary  beds  that  compos< 
them  were  laid  down  under  the  sea.  There  is  no  denying  thi 


140  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

fact.  According  to  Schuchert,  North  America  has  been  sub- 
merged no  less  than  seventeen  times  (gGgaiGoi).  According 
to  Humphreys,  the  sea  has  covered  as  much  as  4,000,000 
square  miles  of  North  America  at  one  time  (231:613). 
Termier  argued  that  the  sedimentary  beds  composing  the 
mountain  ranges  extending  eastward  from  the  Alps  to  Cen- 
tral Asia,  which  were  laid  down  under  the  sea,  would  have 
required  that  the  ancient  Tethys  Sea,  in  which  they  were  laid 
down,  should  have  been  about  6,000  kilometers  (or  perhaps 
4,000  miles)  across  (419:221-22). 

Geophysicists  tend  to  argue  that  such  seas,  which  clearly 
did  exist,  were  merely  shallow  affairs,  invasions  of  the  conti- 
nents by  the  ocean  owing  to  some  unknown  cause.  The  posi- 
tive evidence  for  this,  based  on  the  apparent  absence  from 
the  sedimentary  rocks  of  sediments  formed  in  the  very  deep 
sea,  has  a  fallacy  in  it,  as  will  be  made  plain  later.  The  posi- 
tive evidence  against  the  assumption  that  all  these  seas  were 
shallow  seas  is,  on  the  other  hand,  enormously  strong.  Umb- 
grove,  for  example,  remarks: 

.  .  .  Not  only  have  parts  of  the  continents  foundered  below  sea- 
level  since  pre-Cambrian  times  but  they  have  even  done  so  until  quite 
recently,  and  their  subsidence  occasionally  attained  great  depths!  The 
present  continents  are  but  fragments  of  one-time  larger  blocks.  .  .  . 
(430-  3°)- 

A  particularly  important  example  of  such  foundering 
seems  to  have  occurred  in  the  North  Atlantic,  off  the  north- 
eastern coast  of  the  United  States.  It  has  been  found  that  the 
sediments  that  compose  the  northeastern  states  were  derived 
in  ages  past  from  a  land  mass  to  the  eastward  in  the  present 
North  Atlantic.  This  could  have  been  Brooks's  continent  of 
North  Atlantis. 

Some  geologists,  cowed  by  the  geophysicists,  have  at- 
tempted to  argue  that  these  sediments  might  have  been  de- 
rived from  a  land  mass  situated  on  the  present  continental 
shelf,  but  the  argument  fails  from  every  point  of  view.  Brew- 
ster,  for  example,  comments: 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  141 

It  must  have  been  a  large  continent,  for  the  sand  and  gravel  and 
mud  which  the  rivers  washed  out  to  sea  and  the  waves  ground  up  on 
the  shore  have  built  up  most  of  half  a  dozen  big  states,  while  in  some 
places  the  deposits  are  a  mile  thick  (45:134-35). 

Umbgrove  says  that  while  it  is  impossible  to  estimate  the 
size  of  the  land  mass  (called  "Appalachia"  by  the  geologists), 
it  was  clearly  large,  to  judge  from  the  fact  that  it  has  been 
possible  to  trace  out  in  the  sedimentary  beds  of  the  Appa- 
lachian Mountains  the  outline  of  an  enormous  delta  formed 
by  a  giant  river  flowing  out  of  the  land  mass  to  the  east 

(430:35-38). 

Now  the  continental  shelf  of  North  America  ends  abruptly 
a  very  short  distance  from  the  coast.  It  is  an  extremely  narrow 
strip  between  the  coast  and  the  so-called  "continental  slope," 
where  the  rock  formations  dip  down  suddenly  and  steeply 
into  the  deep  sea.  Its  average  width  is  only  42  miles,  and  its 
maximum  width  does  not  exceed  100  miles  (46).  If  the  sedi- 
ments had  been  derived  from  a  land  mass  on  this  continental 
shelf,  this  very  narrow  land  mass  would  have  had  to  carry 
huge  and  repeatedly  uplifted  mountain  ranges.  Further- 
more, since  drainage  would  naturally  have  carried  sediments 
down  both  slopes  of  these  mountain  ranges,  a  large  propor- 
tion of  the  material  would  have  been  carried  eastward  and 
deposited  in  what  is  now  the  deep  ocean;  but  there  is  no  evi- 
dence of  this. 

The  suggestion  that  the  enormous  volume  of  sediments 
forming  the  northeastern  states  of  the  United  States  came 
from  the  continental  shelf  must  be  considered  improbable.  On 
the  other  hand,  it  is  plain  that  the  former  continent  in  the 
North  Atlantic  could  not  have  been  eroded  away  by  rivers 
any  farther  down  than  approximately  sea  level.  Erosion  did 
not  dispose  of  the  continent,  nor  create  the  deep-sea  basin. 
After  erosion  had  finished  its  work,  the  continent  itself  sank 
to  a  great  depth.  Umbgrove  has  cited  recent  oceanographic 
research  by  Professor  Ewing  of  Columbia,  showing  that  this 
ancient  land  mass  of  Appalachia  now  lies  subsided  about  two 
miles  below  the  continental  shelf  (430:35-38). 


142  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

This  extraordinary  case  is  by  no  means  unique,  for  Umb- 
grove  has  pointed  out  that  the  sediments  composing  much 
of  Spitsbergen  and  Scotland  come  from  the  ocean  west  of 
them,  while  those  composing  the  west  coast  of  Africa  come 
from  a  former  land  mass  in  the  present  South  Atlantic.  Most 
interesting  of  all,  he  indicates  that  the  deepest  of  the  world's 
deep-sea  troughs  (east  of  the  Philippines),  about  seven  miles 
deep,  gives  evidence  that  it  was  once  part  of  a  very  large  con- 
tinent (430:38). 

The  evidence  produced  by  Coleman,  showing  that  a  conti- 
nental ice  sheet  once  invaded  Africa  from  the  sea,  and  that 
the  Indian  ice  sheet  must  have  extended  on  land  far  to  the 
south  of  the  present  tip  of  India,  is  to  the  same  effect.  It 
serves  to  answer  conclusively  the  argument  about  continental 
shelves.  You  can  put  just  so  much  on  a  shelf. 

According  to  Umbgrove,  there  is  ample  evidence  of  re- 
peated upward  and  downward  oscillations  of  the  floor  of  the 
entire  Pacific  (430:236).  In  a  kind  of  rhythm,  the  great  ocean 
has  become  alternately  shallower  and  deeper.  In  the  absence 
of  any  explanation  of  this  phenomenon,  Umbgrove  becomes 
geopoetic.  There  seems  to  him  to  be  something  almost  mysti- 
cal in  this  slow  pulsation  of  the  living  planet.  He  finds  that 
the  unexplained  upward  and  downward  movements  are  not 
limited  to  sea  areas: 

...  It  should  be  noted  that  blocks  that  were  first  submerged,  then 
elevated,  and  then  once  more  submerged  and  elevated,  are  also  met 
with  on  the  continents.  The  sub-Oceanic  features  and  the  similar 
continental  characteristics  cannot  be  explained  at  present,  for  our 
knowledge  of  pre-Cambrian  history  and  terrestrial  dynamics  is  not 
yet  extensive  enough.  .  .  .  (430:241). 

Comparatively  radical  vertical  changes  in  the  positions  of 
land  masses  are  evidenced  by  a  considerable  number  of  an- 
cient beaches  (some  of  them,  however,  not  very  old)  which 
are  now  found  at  great  elevations  above  sea  level,  and  some- 
times far  inland  from  the  present  coasts.  Thus  the  geologist 
P.  Negris  claimed  to  have  found  evidences  of  beaches  on 
three  mountains  of  Greece:  Mt.  Hymettus,  Mt.  Parnassus, 


CONTINENTS    AND     OCEAN     BASINS  143 

and  Mt.  Geraneia,  at,  respectively,  1,400  feet,  1,500  feet, 
and  1,700  feet  above  sea  level.  He  found  a  beach  on  Mt. 
Delos  at  500  feet  (3243:616-17).  William  H.  Hobbs  cited 
a  particularly  interesting  case  of  a  beach  of  recent  date  now 
1,500  feet  above  sea  level,  in  California: 

Upon  the  coast  of  Southern  California  may  be  found  all  the  fea- 
tures of  wave-cut  shores  now  in  perfect  preservation,  and  in  some 
cases  as  much  as  fifteen  hundred  feet  above  the  level  of  the  sea. 
These  features  are  monuments  to  the  grandest  of  earthquake  dis- 
turbances which  in  recent  times  have  visited  the  region  (216:249). 

It  would  be  possible  to  multiply  endlessly  the  evidence  of  the 
raised  beaches,  which  are  found  in  every  part  of  the  world. 
Many  of  them  may  imply  changes  in  the  elevations  of  the  sea 
bottoms,  such  as  are  suggested  by  Umbgrove. 

One  of  the  most  remarkable  features  of  the  earth's  surface 
is  the  Great  Rift  Valley  of  Africa.  The  late  Dr.  Hans  Cloos 
pointed  out  that  the  high  escarpment  along  one  side  of  this 
valley  was  once,  quite  evidently,  the  very  edge  of  the  African 
continent:  not  just  the  beginning  of  the  continental  shelf, 
but  the  very  edge  of  the  continental  mass.  In  some  vast  move- 
ment that  side  of  the  continent  was  tremendously  uplifted, 
and  the  sea  bottom  was  uplifted  with  it  as  much  as  a  mile, 
and  became  dry  land.  This  is  so  interesting  a  matter,  and  of 
such  special  importance  for  our  theory,  that  I  quote  Dr. 
Cloos  at  length: 

There  are  two  rims  to  the  African  continent.  Twice  the  funda- 
mental problem  arises:  why  do  the  continents  of  the  earth  end  so 
abruptly  and  plunge  so  steeply  into  the  deep  sea?  .  .  .  Even  more 
astounding,  what  is  the  meaning  of  the  high,  raised  and  thickened 
mountain  margins  that  most  continents  have?  (85:68). 

.  ,  .  The  short  cross-section  through  the  long  Lebombo  Chain 
looks  unpretentious,  but  it  illuminates  events  far  from  this  remote 
plot  of  the  earth.  For  here  the  old  margin  of  the  continent  is  ex- 
posed. Not  so  long  ago,  during  the  Cretaceous  Period,  the  sea  ex- 
tended to  here  from  the  east.  The  flatland  between  the  Lebombo  hills 
and  the  present  coast  is  uplifted  sea-bottom.  .  .  .  What  we  see  are 
the  flanks  of  a  downward  bend  of  High  Africa  toward  the  Indian 
Ocean.  .  .  . 


144  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

But  we  see  much  more:  the  sedimentary  strata  are  followed  by 
volcanic  rocks  to  the  east  of  the  hills.  Some  parallel  the  strata  like 
flows  or  sheets,  poured  over  them  and  tilted  with  them.  Others  break 
across  the  sandstone  layers  and  rise  steeply  from  below.  This  means 
that  as  the  continent's  rim  was  bent  downward  at  the  Lebombo  hills, 
the  crust  burst,  and  cracks  opened  through  which  hot  melt  shot  up- 
ward and  boiled  over. 

So  the  eastern  margin  of  Africa  at  the  turn  of  the  Paleozoic  Period 
was  a  giant  hinge  on  which  the  crust  bent  down,  to  be  covered  by 
the  ocean.  What  we  see  here  is  merely  a  cross-section  .  .  .  one  can 
go  further  north  or  south,  and  even  to  the  other  side  of  the  continent 
and  discover  that  great  stretches  of  this  unique  land  have  suffered 
the  same  fate.  The  oceans  sank  adjacent  to  the  continents,  and  the 
continent  rose  out  of  the  ocean  (85:73-74). 

Cloos  makes  it  clear  that  in  one  geological  period  the 
continent  was  bent  down  so  that  a  part  of  it  became  sea  bot- 
tom (not  merely  continental  shelf)  and  that  at  a  later  period 
it  was  uplifted  some  6,000  feet,  the  sea  bottom  became  land, 
and  the  continental  margin  was  shoved  far  to  the  east.  When 
we  contemplate  gigantic  movements  of  this  sort,  it  seems 
reasonable  to  take  the  geophysical  objections  to  changes  in 
the  positions  of  the  continents  with  a  grain  of  salt.  If  a  large 
part  of  a  continent  can  be  shown  not  to  have  been  perma- 
nent, it  is  unnecessary  to  assume  the  permanence  of  any  of  it. 
On  the  other  hand,  such  changes  need  to  be  explained,  and 
they  need  to  be  reconciled  with  basic  principles  of  physics. 
The  fact  that  theories  of  continent  formation  and  history 
hitherto  proposed  have  failed  to  solve  the  problem  reduced  a 
recent  writer  on  lost  continents  to  the  following  confession  of 
ignorance: 

Since  somebody  can  bring  good,  solid  objections  on  one  ground  or 
another  against  all  these  hypotheses,  however,  we  had  better  agree 
that  nobody  knows  why  continents  or  parts  of  continents  sink,  and  let 
it  go  at  that.  No  doubt  a  sound  explanation,  perhaps  combining  fea- 
tures of  the  older  theories,  will  be  forthcoming  some  day  (64:161). 

It  may  be  useful  to  consider,  in  juxtaposition,  the  African 
Rift  with  the  question  of  the  North  Atlantic  land  mass  al- 
ready discussed.  In  a  sense,  the  two  are  complementary.  In 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN    BASINS  145 

one  case  a  continent  apparently  subsided;  in  the  other  it  first 
subsided  and  then  was  raised  up.  Quite  obviously  the  move- 
ments in  both  directions  must  have  been  related  to  one 
fundamental  dynamic  process.  The  physical  geology  of  the 
Rift,  which  can  be  directly  examined,  shows  that  the  indirect 
evidence  of  the  sedimentary  rocks  of  the  northeastern  states 
of  the  United  States,  and  of  Scotland  and  Spitsbergen  (and 
the  paleontological  evidence),  must  be  taken  seriously.  The 
evidence  in  favor  of  an  important  land  mass  in  the  present 
North  Atlantic  cannot  be  dismissed. 


5.  The  Evidence  of  Oceanography 

A  great  deal  of  new  evidence  bearing  on  the  question  of  the 
permanence  of  continents  and  ocean  basins  has  resulted  from 
the  oceanographic  research  of  recent  years.  There  has  been  a 
revolution  in  our  ideas  of  the  nature  of  the  ocean  floor. 
Formerly,  it  was  thought  that  the  ocean  floors  were  continu- 
ous, flat  marine  plains,  buried  thousands  of  feet  deep  under 
an  accumulation  of  sediments  extending  back  in  unbroken 
series  to  the  earliest  geological  periods.  After  all,  the  theory 
of  permanence  of  the  ocean  basins  required  this  concept.  It 
has  been  found,  however,  that,  on  the  contrary,  there  are 
hills,  valleys,  mountain  systems,  and  canyons  on  the  sea  bot- 
tom very  much  like  those  on  land.  There  is  no  continuous 
thick  layer  of  sediments.  The  features  of  the  ocean  bottom 
appear  to  resemble,  in  singular  fashion,  those  of  the  land. 
One  of  our  leading  geologists,  Richard  Foster  Flint,  has 
written: 

Sound-wave  surveying  .  .  .  has  revolutionized  our  picture  of  the 
ocean  floor.  Instead  of  the  plainslike  surfaces  that  were  once  believed 
to  be  nearly  universal,  broad  areas  of  the  floor  are  now  known  to  have 
an  intricacy  of  detail  that  rivals  that  of  complex  land  surfaces.  In 
some  places  the  detail  seems  to  have  resulted  from  local  warping  and 
faulting  of  the  crust  and  submarine  volcanic  activity,  but  in  others  it 
consists  of  valley  systems  somewhat  like  those  that  diversify  the  land. 


146  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

Geologists  are  not  agreed  as  to  whether  these  features  are  valley 
systems  cut  by  streams  and  later  submerged  or  depressions  excavated 
by  currents  beneath  the  sea  (155). 

Now  this  problem  must  be  examined  as  a  whole.  Certain 
facts  are  now  obvious  and  can  be  plainly  stated. 

In  the  first  place,  if  a  continent  can  be  lifted  up  a  mile, 
and  the  sea  floor  exposed,  as  in  the  case  of  Africa,  surely  it 
can  also  be  let  down.  Thus  there  is  no  reason  for  anyone  to 
lose  his  temper  at  the  idea  that  some  of  these  drowned  sur- 
faces were  once  above  sea  level.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  not 
necessary  to  claim  that  they  were  in  all  instances  eroded 
above  sea  level.  We  saw,  in  the  last  chapter,  that  the  basic 
processes  of  mountain  formation,  folding,  faulting,  and  vol- 
canism,  are  of  a  kind  that  can  take  place  just  as  well  below 
as  above  sea  level.  The  only  factor  in  mountain  formation 
that  is  mainly  operative  on  the  land  is  erosion,  and  that  is, 
as  we  have  seen,  a  secondary  factor. 

Secondly,  one  of  the  most  impressive  arguments  in  favor 
of  the  permanence  of  the  ocean  basins  is  that  almost  all  the 
sedimentary  rocks  that  compose  the  continents  appear  to  be 
made  of  sediments  that  were  laid  down  in  comparatively 
shallow  water,  on  or  near  the  continental  shelves.  We  have 
already  seen,  however,  that  parts  of  continents  (at  least)  have 
been  submerged  to  great  depths,  and  that  parts  of  the  deep- 
sea  bottom  have  been  uplifted  to  form  land.  Why,  then,  have 
rocks  composed  of  typical  deep-sea  sediments  not  been  found? 

A  number  of  factors  may  account  for  this.  The  primary 
factor  may  be  the  rate  of  sedimentation.  In  the  deep  sea  this 
is  extraordinarily  slow— as  low  as  one  inch  in  2,500  years. 
Near  the  coasts  it  can  be  hundreds  of  times  more  rapid. 

The  theory  presented  in  this  book  provides  a  mechanism 
that  would  tend  to  operate  against  the  consolidation  of  this 
deep-sea  sediment  into  rock.  Frequent  displacements  of  the 
crust  of  the  earth  would  naturally  be  accompanied  by  in- 
creased turbulence  on  the  ocean  bottom,  by  which  sediments 
would  be  dispersed  and  mixed  with  other  sediments.  There 
has  been  in  recent  years  a  great  extension  of  our  knowledge 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  147 

regarding  the  operation  of  turbidity  currents  (137,  139,  141) 
caused  by  the  slumping  of  sediments  from  the  continental 
slopes,  and  by  other  forces.  It  seems  that  such  currents,  even 
now,  are  powerful  enough  to  bring  about  considerable  re- 
arrangement of  the  unconsolidated  sediments  of  the  ocean 
bottom.  A  displacement  of  the  crust  would  greatly  magnify 
their  force,  for  it  would  cause  extensive  changes  in  the  direc- 
tions of  major  ocean  currents,  changes  in  sea  and  land  levels, 
extensive  volcanism  in  the  sea  as  well  as  on  land,  and  an 
increased  number  and  a  greater  intensity  of  earthquakes, 
which  would  occasion  extensive  slumpings  of  sediments  along 
the  continental  slopes.  If  we  consider  that  one  such  displace- 
ment would,  in  all  probability,  keep  the  turbulence  at  a  high 
point  for  several  thousand  years,  we  can  conclude  that  the 
resulting  dispersal  of  deep-sea  sediments  would  probably  be 
on  a  considerable  scale. 

Finally,  since  we  cannot  suppose  that  any  area  would  be 
uplifted  rapidly  from  the  deep  sea  to  the  surface  (that  is,  all 
the  way  in  the  course  of  a  single  displacement),  it  follows  that 
in  most  cases  deep-sea  sediments  would  be  raised  into  shallow 
water,  where  they  would  be  exposed  for  a  long  time  in  an 
unconsolidated  state  to  the  erosive  action  of  the  much  more 
rapid  currents  near  the  surface  before  they  would  be  likely 
to  be  raised  above  sea  level.  A  very  small  proportion  of  deep- 
sea  sediment  would  then  be  mixed  by  the  currents  with  a 
large  proportion  of  sediment  typical  of  shallow  seas,  and 
would,  in  most  cases,  entirely  disappear.  These  factors  to- 
gether dispose  of  this  argument  for  the  permanence  of  ocean 
basins. 

Another  interesting  line  of  evidence  with  respect  to  this 
problem  is  provided  by  the  recent  discovery  on  the  bottoms 
of  the  oceans,  already  mentioned,  of  several  hundred  moun- 
tains of  varying  heights,  which  have  been  given  the  name  of 
"sea  mounts."  These  have  the  common  characteristic  of  be- 
ing flat-topped.  Apparently,  their  tops  were  made  flat  by  the 
action  of  the  sea  at  the  time  they  were  at  the  sea  level.  Now 


148  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

the  flat  tops  are  submerged  anywhere  from  a  few  hundred 
feet  to  three  miles  below  sea  level. 

When  these  sea  mounts  were  first  discovered,  they  were 
explained  in  accordance  with  the  theory  of  the  permanence 
of  ocean  basins  (210).  It  was  proposed  that  as  the  sediments 
gathered  in  enormous  thickness  on  the  ocean  floor  through 
hundreds  of  millions  of  years,  the  floor  actually  gave  way, 
and  sank,  taking  the  sea  mounts  down  below  sea  level.  This 
theory  was  undermined,  of  course,  by  the  discovery  that  no 
such  thick  layer  of  sediments  exists  on  the  ocean  floors,  but 
that,  on  the  contrary,  the  layer  of  sediments  is  in  some  places 
extremely  thin,  or  even  virtually  nonexistent. 

Another  line  of  evidence  helps  to  dispose  completely  of 
this  explanation  of  sea  mounts.  Foraminifera  are  minute  pro- 
tozoa that  live  in  the  sea.  Their  species  vary  with  differences 
in  the  depth  and  temperature  of  the  water  in  which  they  live, 
and  those  of  past  geological  periods,  found  in  fossil  state, 
differ  from  living  species.  Studies  of  fossilized  foraminifera 
from  the  tops  of  the  sea  mounts  have  revealed  that  they  are 
much  younger  than  the  sea  mounts  have  been  assumed  to 
be  (197).  Comparatively  recent  species  have  been  gathered 
from  the  tops  of  sea  mounts  subsided  to  great  depths.  Unless 
turbidity  currents  could  suffice  to  carry  such  deposits  long 
distances  across  the  ocean  floor  and  then  upwards  to  the  tops 
of  the  sea  mounts,  another  cause  for  the  subsidence  of  the 
sea  mounts  must  be  found.  When  we  remember  that  Umb- 
grove  referred  to  frequent  upward  and  downward  oscillations 
of  the  floor  of  the  Pacific,  resulting  from  an  unknown  cause, 
we  can  see  that  the  idea  of  a  gradual  and  continuous  sub- 
sidence of  the  ocean  floor  under  the  weight  of  accumulating 
sediments  is  a  singularly  weak  one,  for  even  if  the  supposed 
layer  of  sediments  existed,  the  theory  still  unaccountably 
ignores  the  recurring  uplifts  of  the  sea  bottom. 

The  foregoing  considerations  reveal  the  essential  weakness 
of  the  conclusion  that  the  seas  that  periodically  invaded  the 
continents  were  always  shallow  seas— "epicontinental"  seas, 
flooding  the  permanent  continents.  First  there  was  land; 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  149 

then,  no  doubt,  shallow  seas;  after  that,  in  some  cases,  very 
deep  sea,  then  again  shallow  sea,  and  finally  again  land,  all  in 
the  same  place.  But  the  interludes  of  deep  sea  may  have  been, 
in  many  cases,  very  short,  and  the  sedimentation  resulting 
may  have  never  been  consolidated.  Thus  the  deep  sea  could 
come  and  go,  and  nobody  the  wiser.  New  evidence  bearing 
on  this  problem  is  now  available  as  the  result  of  recent  Soviet 
oceanographic  work  in  the  Arctic.  Soviet  scientists  have 
found  evidence  that  the  Arctic  Ocean  itself  has  existed  only 
since  the  comparatively  recent  Mesozoic  Era  (364:18).  We 
shall  return  to  this  evidence. 

It  seems  reasonable  to  conclude  that  at  least  some  of  the 
problems  presented  by  the  continents  and  ocean  basins  are 
soluble  in  terms  of  the  principles  described  in  this  and  previ- 
ous chapters.  Land  links  may  be  explained  as  the  conse- 
quences of  mountain  formation  on  the  sea  bottom;  tempo- 
rary and  limited  uplift  or  subsidence  of  large  areas  may  result 
directly  from  their  poleward  or  equatorward  displacement. 
The  major  changes,  however—the  enormous  elevations  and 
subsidences,  the  destruction  and  creation  of  continents—re- 
quire us  to  examine  the  deepest  possible  consequences  and 
implications  of  crust  displacement.  We  must  now  undertake 
this  deeper  examination.  This  requires  us  to  take  another 
glance  at  the  nature  and  structure  of  the  crust  of  the  earth, 
to  its  full  depth,  as  far  as  our  present  geophysical  knowledge 
permits. 


6.  The  Deeper  Structure  of  the  Earth's  Crust 

It  has,  until  lately,  been  the  impression  that  the  earth's  crust, 
considered  as  a  crystalline  layer  between  20  and  40  miles 
thick,  was  itself  composed  of  various  layers,  with  rocks  of 
increasing  density  at  increasing  depths.  This  would  have 
been  a  natural  development  with  a  cooling  earth,  for  it  might 
be  supposed  that  the  lighter  materials  in  a  liquid  would  tend 
to  float  on  the  heavier  ones,  and  would  solidify  in  the  order 


150  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

of  their  density,  with  the  lightest  on  top.  Daly,  in  1940,  pro- 
posed the  following  layering  of  the  crust,  at  least  under  the 
continents: 

a.  The  sedimentary  rocks,  at  the  surface. 

b.  Below  these  a  layer  of  basement  rocks  of  granitic  type, 
ending  about  15  kilometers,  or  9  miles,  down. 

c.  A  third  layer  of  rock,  of  somewhat  greater  weight,  about 
25  kilometers,  or  15  miles,  thick. 

d.  A  fourth  layer,  about  10  kilometers,  or  6  miles,  thick,  of 
still  heavier  rock. 

Having  proposed  these  layers,  however,  he  added  that  "the 
exact  depths  of  the  discontinuities  are  not  easily  demon- 
strated" and  "it  seems  clear  that  each  of  the  breaks  varies  in 
its  depth  below  the  rocky  surface"  (97:17).  In  another  place 
he  gave  evidence  of  light  matter  at  the  very  bottom  of  the 
crust  (97:223).  These  layers,  then,  according  to  Daly,  are  very 
peculiar.  There  is  nothing  regular  about  them.  On  the  one 
hand,  he  gives  rough  estimates  of  their  thicknesses.  On  the 
other  hand,  he  indicates  that  these  estimates  are  of  little 
value.  They  are,  in  fact,  mere  rough  averages;  they  indicate 
a  trend  toward  increasing  density  with  depth,  together  with 
enormous  confusion  in  the  distribution  of  materials. 

In  view  of  the  extreme  uncertainties  of  Daly's  view  of  the 
structure  of  the  earth's  crust,  it  can  hardly  come  as  a  com- 
plete surprise  that  the  most  recent  geophysical  investigation 
of  the  structure  of  the  crust  by  the  method  of  sound-wave 
surveying  has  failed  to  show  any  distinct  layering  of  the 
crust.  The  geophysicists  Tatel  and  Tuve  have  reported  that 
the  results  of  the  most  recent  studies,  using  the  most  recent 
techniques,  indicate  that  rocks  of  greater  or  less  density  are 
intermixed  in  utter  confusion,  that  the  essential  structure 
of  the  crust  is  really  that  of  a  rubble,  on  a  large  scale  (416: 
107). 

The  main  argument  of  the  geophysicists  who  speak  in 
favor  of  the  permanence  of  the  continents,  and,  consequently, 
of  the  ocean  basins,  is  based  on  the  observed  difference  in 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  15! 

composition  of  continents  and  of  the  crust  under  the 
oceans,  a  difference  that  has  been  verified  for  the  uppermost 
few  miles  of  the  continental  and  oceanic  sectors  of  the  crust, 
but  not  for  the  greater  depths. 

Now,  if  everything  below,  say,  a  depth  of  ten  miles  were 
layered  everywhere  at  equal  depths  with  rock  of  equal 
densities,  no  quarrel  whatever  could  be  had  with  the  geo- 
physicists  who  argue  for  the  permanence  of  continents  and 
ocean  basins.  For  in  that  case,  only  a  massive  change  in  the 
distribution  of  the  superficial  layers  of  light  and  heavy  rock 
could  change  the  distribution  of  continents  and  ocean  basins. 
Granitic  or  sedimentary  rocks  at  the  surface  .would  have  to 
be  destroyed  or  created  in  enormous  quantity  to  destroy  or 
create  a  continent. 

It  is  entirely  otherwise  with  the  structure  as  suggested  by 
Daly  and  as  revealed  in  the  recent  geophysical  surveys.  To 
understand  this  it  is  necessary  only  to  visualize  that  the  rela- 
tive elevation  of  the  surface  at  any  point  is  determined  by 
the  average  density  of  the  entire  column  of  matter  between 
the  surface  at  that  point  and  the  bottom  of  the  crust,  where, 
presumably,  the  inequalities  at  different  points  are  pretty 
well  averaged  out. 

If  the  crust  is  not  definitely  layered,  if,  as  both  Daly  and 
recent  geophysicists  agree,  there  are  radical  variations  in  the 
structure,  then  the  vital  changes  may  occur  at  any  depth, 
deep  down  as  well  as  at  the  surface.  There  is  reason  to  be- 
lieve that  massive  changes  may  occur  more  easily  deep  down 
than  at  the  surface.  Thus,  the  crust  might  be  weighted  in  its 
lower  parts  by  an  intrusion  of  a  great  mass  of  molten  rock 
of  high  density  from  below,  a  very  likely  result  of  a  displace- 
ment. In  either  case,  whether  the  addition  of  the  heavy  mat- 
ter occurred  near  the  surface  or  far  below  it,  the  result  would 
equally  have  been  a  depression  of  the  surface,  with  a  con- 
sequent encroachment  of  the  sea.  Obviously,  a  repetition  of 
such  movements  could  subside  a  continent  to  a  great  depth, 
without  altering  the  composition  of  the  superficial  forma- 
tions. 


152  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

On  the  other  hand,  a  shifting  of  the  masses  of  lighter  rock, 
which  might  have  formed  the  downward  projections  of  con- 
tinents and  mountain  chains,  as  the  result  of  a  displacement, 
could  lighten  certain  sectors  of  the  crust  and  result  in  their 
uplift. 

That  rocks  of  light  weight  are  to  be  found  at  the  very 
bottom  of  the  crust  (and  even  in  the  downward  projections 
under  continents  and  mountain  chains  that  extend  to  greater 
depth)  might,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  have  been  deduced  from 
Daly's  observation  that  the  process  of  mountain  folding  has 
involved  the  whole  depth  of  the  crust,  and  not  just  its  surface 
layers  (97:399)-  His  suggestion  is  that  since  the  folding  of 
the  crust  to  form  mountain  ranges  involves  its  horizontal 
shortening,  the  horizontal  shearing  movement  has  to  take 
place  at  the  level  where  displacement  will  be  easiest,  which 
will  be  at  the  bottom  of  the  crust  where  the  rock  has  mini- 
mum, or  zero,  strength.  For  it  is  plain  that  at  a  level  at  which 
the  rock  possessed  any  considerable  tensile  strength,  the 
shearing  of  one  layer  over  another  horizontally  would  be 
practically  out  of  the  question. 

It  would  seem,  from  these  considerations,  that  the  com- 
monly used  terms  "sial"  and  "sima"  to  differentiate  lighter 
from  heavier  material  in  the  crust,  especially  when  they  are 
presumed  to  indicate  different  layers,  have  very  little  mean- 
ing. They  amount  to  trends  merely,  and  take  no  account  of 
the  detailed  distributions  of  the  materials  of  different  density 
either  vertically  or  horizontally.  It  would  be  wrong,  there- 
fore, to  assume  that  just  because  we  find  a  layer  of  basalt  on 
the  floor  of  the  Atlantic  (as  has  been  recently  reported)  this 
layer  necessarily  extends  to  the  bottom  of  the  crust,  and  is 
not  underlain,  at  greater  depth,  by  sedimentary  and  granitic 
rocks  of  less  density.  It  is  even  true  that  the  layer  of  basalt 
may  have  been  extruded  during  the  subsidence  of  the  sea 
bottom  in  the  last  movement  of  the  crust,  and  have  been, 
in  itself,  one  cause  of  the  subsidence. 

Jaggar,  for  one,  considered  that  it  was  far  more  reasonable 
to  account  for  subsidence  or  elevation  at  the  surface  by 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  153 

changes  of  weighting  deep  in  the  crust  than  by  erosion  and 
sedimentation  at  the  surface.  He  remarked: 

...  It  would  seem  possible  that  intrusive  and  extrusive  processes 
may  lighten  or  weight  the  crust  much  more  profoundly  than  the 
movement  of  sediments  (235: 153). 

How,  precisely,  would  these  processes  be  apt  to  be  set  in 
motion  by  a  displacement  of  the  crust?  We  saw  that  a  dis- 
placement would  cause  a  general  fracturing  of  the  crust,  the 
creation  of  a  new  world-wide  fracture  pattern.  In  areas  moved 
toward  the  equator,  the  extension  of  the  surface  area  would 
involve  some  pulling  apart  of  the  crust,  the  separation  of  the 
fragments,  their  subsidence  into  the  semiliquid  melt  below, 
and  the  rise  of  the  magma  into  the  fractures,  with,  at  some 
points  no  doubt,  massive  eruptions  on  the  surface.  Differen- 
tial movements  of  blocks  of  the  crust  would  occur  as  each 
sought  its  gravitational  equilibrium,  some  rising  and  others 
subsiding.  In  areas  moved  poleward  compression  would  be 
the  rule,  with  some  folding  of  the  crust,  with  block  faulting 
accompanied  by  tilting  of  larger  or  smaller  blocks.  In  these 
areas  the  strata  of  lighter  rock  would  grow  thicker,  from 
being  folded  upon  themselves;  in  equatorward-moving  areas, 
on  the  other  hand,  they  would  tend  to  grow  thinner,  because 
much  of  the  lighter  rock  might  be  engulfed  in  the  rising 
heavy  magma. 

However,  major  changes  in  the  situation  of  continents 
require  additional  processes,  even  though  changes  such  as 
those  suggested  above  might,  if  they  accumulated  over  long 
periods  of  time,  produce  very  important  results.  The  massive 
changes,  capable  of  subsiding  or  elevating  continents,  might 
be  of  two  different  sorts,  though  both  of  them  must,  in  the 
nature  of  things,  remain  speculative  for  the  present.  One  of 
these  would  be  the  massive  intrusion  of  immense  quantities 
of  heavy  magma  into  the  crust  (resulting  finally  in  plateau 
basalts).  Such  an  effect  could  be  produced  by  subcrustal  cur- 
rents set  in  motion  by  a  displacement,  and  would  have  the 
effect  of  causing  a  major  subsidence  at  the  surface.  The  other 
cause  of  massive  change  in  the  average  density  of  a  given  col- 


154 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 


\ 


Fig.  V. 


Consequences  of  Displacement:  Cross  Section  of  Earth  at  96° 
East  of  Greenwich  Showing  Centrifugal  Effect  of  Icecap 


In  Figs.  V  and  VI  the  artist  imaginatively  suggests  some  consequences  of 
a  displacement  of  the  crust.  On  this  page  we  see  a  cross  section  of  the 
earth  before  the  movement,  with  the  eccentric  icecap  above  the  equilib- 
rium surface  of  the  earth.  On  page  155  we  see  a  cross  section  of  the  earth 
after  a  displacement  through  about  30  degrees  of  latitude.  The  drawings 
are  not  to  scale.  It  has  been  necessary,  for  purposes  of  illustration,  to 
exaggerate  the  oblateness  of  the  earth,  the  depths  of  the  oceans,  and 
the  thickness  of  the  crust  several  hundred  times.  The  drawings  illustrate: 
(i)  The  subsidence  of  the  crust  in  areas  displaced  toward  the  equator, 
relatively  to  sea  level,  and  its  uplift  in  areas  moved  poleward.  (2)  The 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS 


155 


Fig.  VI.    Consequences  of  Displacement:  Cross  Section  of  Earth  at  96° 
East  of  Greenwich  Showing  Hypothetical  Effect  of  Shift  of  Crust 


fracturing  and  tilting  of  crustal  blocks,  suggested  schematically.  It  should 
be  understood  that  in  reality  the  blocks  would  be  comparatively  small 
and  the  fractures  would  be  numbered  in  millions.  (3)  The  displacements 
of  parts  of  the  downward  projections  of  the  crust  under  continents  and 
mountain  chains,  which  would  have  an  effect  on  the  permanent  eleva- 
tion of  the  surface  relatively  to  sea  level.  (4)  The  volcanism  attending 
the  movement,  with  the  projection  into  the  atmosphere  of  volcanic  dust 
capable  of  causing  meteorological  effects. 


156  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

umn  of  the  crust  (that  is,  a  section  extending  from  top  to 
bottom  of  the  crust)  would  be  a  shifting  of  light  matter  from 
one  point  to  another  under  the  bottom  of  the  crust.  This 
matter  was  discussed  in  the  last  chapter.  While  in  that  chap- 
ter relatively  minor  effects  were  considered,  it  is  true,  never- 
theless, that  the  shifting  of  light  matter  from  one  point  un- 
der the  crust  to  another  could  take  place  on  a  very  large  scale. 
What  might  be  the  upshot  of  all  these  changes  during  a 
displacement  of  the  crust?  The  result  might  well  be  that 
while  the  distribution  of  light  and  heavy  matter  near  the 
surface  would  be  unchanged,  its  distribution  (average  den- 
sity) between  the  surface  and  the  bottom  of  the  crust  would 
be  materially  changed.  This  is  undoubtedly  the  direction  in 
which  we  must  look  for  a  solution  of  the  problem  of  con- 
tinents and  ocean  basins,  as  a  means  of  reconciling  geophysi- 
cal ideas  with  the  evidence  of  biology  and  geology. 

I  cannot  close  without  reference  to  a  singular  confirmation 
of  the  line  of  reasoning  adopted  in  this  chapter,  which  I  find 
in  Umbgrove's  discussion  of  the  work  of  the  geologist  Barrell, 
with  whom  he  disagreed. 

Umbgrove  is  considering  the  question  of  the  submergence 
of  continents.  It  is  clear  from  his  discussion  that  Barrell's 
conception  of  the  process  requires  a  theory  of  crust  displace- 
ment. Umbgrove  states  the  problem  thus:  If  we  are  to  sup- 
pose the  submergence  of  continents,  we  must  either  suppose 
a  change  in  the  amount  of  the  ocean  water,  which,  if  it  in- 
creased, could  flood  a  continent  (or  several  at  once),  or,  if  the 
water  remained  about  the  same  in  quantity,  the  submergence 
of  one  continent  must  be  balanced  by  the  elevation  of  an- 
other. He  presents  the  findings  of  specialists  to  show  that 
the  quantity  of  water  on  the  earth's  surface  has  remained 
about  the  same,  from  the  earliest  times,  and  adds: 

Should  one,  nevertheless,  cling  to  the  theory  of  submerged  conti- 
nents, the  only  alternative  would  be  to  assume  that  while  vast  blocks 
were  being  submerged  in  one  area,  parts  of  the  ocean  floor  of  almost 
identical  size  were  being  elevated  in  others.  .  .  . 


CONTINENTS    AND    OCEAN     BASINS  157 

It  is  not  quite  clear,  however,  why  such  opposed  movements  should 
have  occurred  in  areas  of  almost  equal  extent.  Nor  is  it  clear  why 
these  movements  should  have  occurred  in  such  a  way  that  the  sea- 
level  remained  comparatively  stable.  .  .  .  (430:235-36). 

But  a  displacement  of  the  crust—or  several  displacements 
—would  fulfill  all  these  requirements.  In  a  displacement  two 
quarters  of  the  surface,  opposite  each  other,  must  move  to- 
ward the  poles,  while  the  other  two  quarters  must  move  to- 
ward the  equator.  Whatever  forces  tend  to  produce  uplift  in 
the  poleward-moving  areas  will  be  balanced  by  equal  forces 
producing  subsidence  in  the  quarters  moving  equatorward. 
And  the  sea  level  would  be  stable,  except  for  very  minor 
fluctuations. 

Barrell  himself  suggests  that  subsidence  of  continental 
areas  would  be  aided  by  liquid  intrusions,  "the  weight  of 
magmas  of  high  specific  gravity  rising  widely  and  in  enor- 
mous volume  from  a  deep  core  of  greater  density  into  these 
portions  of  an  originally  lighter  crust.  .  .  ."  (430:235-36). 

Barrell's  suggestion  points  to  the  chief  weakness  of  the 
geophysical  argument  in  favoi  of  the  permanence  of  the  con- 
tinents. As  I  have  already  pointed  out,  geophysicists  seem, 
too  often,  to  take  as  the  frame  of  reference  only  the  outer- 
most ten  miles  or  so  of  the  crust.  Theoretically  they  base 
calculations  on  the  full  depth  of  the  crust,  but  practically 
this  assumption  is  cancelled  out  by  the  assumption  that  the 
crust  is  arranged  in  layers  of  equal  density,  so  that  significant 
changes  of  density  in  depth  are  excluded.  But  if  the  real 
possibilities  of  changes  of  average  density  in  the  full  depth 
of  the  crust  are  taken  into  account,  the  difficulties  in  the 
face  of  the  subsidence  and  elevation  of  continents  vanish. 


VI  :  THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH 


In  the  two  preceding  chapters  we  have  considered  the  evi- 
dence for  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  provided  by 
mountain  chains,  earth  fractures,  volcanic  zones,  continents, 
and  ocean  basins.  We  have  had  occasion  to  refer,  a  number 
of  times,  to  the  effects  of  the  force  of  gravity,  and  of  the 
earth's  rotation,  on  the  earth's  crust.  The  understanding  of 
the  theory  of  crust  displacement  presented  in  this  book  de- 
pends entirely  on  a  correct  understanding  of  these  two  forces, 
and  of  the  operation  of  what  we  call  the  principle  of  isostasy. 
The  ideas  are  not  difficult,  provided  certain  essentials  are 
kept  in  mind. 


j.  Isostasy  and  the  Icecap 

The  globe  we  live  on  is  shaped  primarily  by  the  force  of 
gravitation.  The  weight  of  the  materials  of  which  it  is  com- 
posed is  greater  than  their  strength,  and  they  have  therefore 
been  bent,  broken,  or  forced  to  flow  by  this  force  until  the 
globe  has  become  a  sphere.  It  is  not,  however,  a  perfect 
sphere.  The  earth  deviates  from  being  a  perfect  sphere  be- 
cause it  is  rotating  rapidly,  and  the  rotation  produces  a  cen- 
trifugal effect  that  tends  to  throw  the  materials  outward  at 
right  angles  to  the  earth's  axis,  and  against  the  force  of  grav- 
ity. This  slightly  modifies  the  earth's  shape,  producing  a 
bulge  around  the  equator  and  a  flattening  at  the  poles.  The 
earth  modifies  its  shape  until  the  two  forces  are  in  balance, 
and  the  resulting  oblate  sphere  is  called  the  "geoid." 

Of  course,  there  is  always  a  considerable  amount  of  shift- 
ing of  materials  going  on  on  the  face  of  the  earth,  rivers 
bringing  down  sediment  to  the  sea,  icecaps  growing  and 
melting,  and  these  changes  are  constantly  upsetting  the  bal- 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  159 

ance  and  requiring  readjustments.  The  crust  of  the  earth, 
being  very  thin  as  compared  with  the  whole  diameter  of  the 
globe,  is  correspondingly  weak,  and  usually  gives  way  if  much 
material  is  accumulated  on  it  at  any  one  spot.  The  layer 
under  the  crust  is  considered  to  be  quite  weak,  and  it  per- 
mits the  crust  to  give  way  by  flowing  out  from  under.  This 
process  is  called  "isostatic  adjustment/'  Funk  and  Wagnalls 
define  isostasy  as  follows: 

Theoretical  condition  of  equilibrium  which  the  earth's  surface 
tends  to  assume  under  the  action  of  terrestrial  gravitation  as  affected 
by  the  transference  of  material  from  regions  of  denudation  to  those 
of  deposition,  and  by  difference  of  density  of  various  portions  of  the 
earth's  mass  near  the  surface. 

In  the  last  chapter  we  considered  at  length  the  effects  of 
the  differences  of  density  of  rocks  under  oceans  and  con- 
tinents, and  how  heavy  rocks  tend  to  reach  equilibrium  at 
lower  elevation,  and  lighter  rocks  tend  to  be  found  in  con- 
tinents and  mountain  chains. 

According  to  the  principle  of  isostasy,  it  has  been  widely 
assumed  that  an  icecap  such  as  the  one  in  Antarctica  should 
be  in  good  isostatic  equilibrium.  Of  course,  if  this  were  true, 
the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap  would  be  balanced  at 
every  point  by  the  force  of  gravity,  and  there  would  be  no 
effect  left  over  to  tend  to  shove  the  crust  over  the  plastic 
layer  below.  There  might  be  a  slight  effect  resulting  from 
the  elevation  of  the  continent  and  the  icecap  above  the 
mean  earth  surface,  but  it  would  be  too  small  to  consider. 
Thus,  our  theory  depends  upon  our  ability  to  show  that 
isostasy  has  not  operated  effectively  in  Antarctica.  The  ques- 
tion becomes  one  of  estimating  the  difference  between  the 
rate  of  growth  of  the  ice  sheet,  the  rate  of  yield  of  the  crust, 
and  the  rate  of  flow  of  the  plastic  layer  under  the  crust.  The 
calculation  must  also  take  account  of  the  amount  of  load 
that  may  be  borne  by  the  crust,  indefinitely,  out  of  isostatic 
adjustment,  because  of  its  degree  of  tensile  strength.  Camp- 
bell's calculations  of  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap,  and 
of  the  resulting  bursting  stress  on  the  crust  (Chapter  XI), 


160  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

are  based  on  the  assumption  that  the  whole  mass  of  the  ice- 
cap is  uncompensated.  They  are  only  approximations,  and 
must  be  modified  as  soon  as  more  information  as  to  the  de- 
gree of  the  isostatic  adjustment  of  the  icecap  is  available. 
On  the  other  hand,  it  does  not  necessarily  follow  that  the 
gravity  measurements  to  be  taken  in  Antarctica  during  the 
coming  year  will  be  able  to  provide  a  definite  answer  to 
the  question.  It  is  obvious  that  the  theory  of  isostasy  is  at  pres- 
ent under  considerable  attack,  and  that  differences  of  opinion 
exist  as  to  the  validity  of  the  various  methods  of  interpreting 
the  findings  about  the  gravitational  balance  of  the  crust. 
Daly  himself  remarked  that  probably  none  of  the  present 
methods  for  determining  the  degree  of  isostatic  adjustment 
of  a  crustal  sector  was  capable  of  getting  very  close  to  the 
truth.  A  far  more  serious  attack  on  the  theory  was  made  some 
time  ago  by  Hubbert  and  Melton.  They  pointed  out  that 
all  methods  of  reducing  gravity  data  to  measure  isostatic 
compensation  depend  upon  assumptions  regarding  the  dis- 
tribution of  materials  in  the  earth,  which  must  be  regarded 
as  essentially  unknown  (226:688).  They  conclude: 

The  fields  providing  data  on  the  subject  of  isostasy  are  geodesy 
[measurement  of  the  shape  of  the  earth],  seismology  [study  of  patterns 
of  earthquake  waves],  and  geology.  The  data  of  the  first,  which  until 
recently  have  provided  the  main  support  of  isostatic  theory,  have 
been  shown  by  Hopfner  to  be  invalid.  The  data  of  the  second  have 
only  an  indirect  bearing  on  the  question.  The  data  of  the  last  are 
more  often  than  not  contrary  to  isostatic  expectations.  Hence,  the 
theory  of  isostasy  must  for  the  present  be  regarded  as  resting  upon  a 
none  too  secure  foundation,  and  it  is  hardly  trustworthy  for  use  as  a 
major  premise  in  present  discussions  of  earth  problems  (226:695). 

In  the  following  pages  I  shall  proceed  on  the  assumption 
that  the  isostatic  principle  is  generally  correct,  even  though 
present  methods  of  measurement  are  unsatisfactory.  I  shall 
assume  that  the  materials  of  the  earth's  surface  are  under 
constant  gravitational  pressure  to  conform  to  the  ellipsoidal 
shape  of  the  earth,  and  that  this  applies  to  the  icecap,  and 
will  bring  about  a  tendency  of  the  crust  under  the  icecap 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  l6l 

to  yield  and  sink,  displacing  soft  rock  from  below  as  the  ice- 
cap grows  in  weight.  At  the  same  time  I  should  like  to  pre- 
sent a  number  of  considerations  indicating  that  there  is,  at 
the  present  time,  a  massive  departure  from  isostatic  equi- 
librium in  Antarctica. 

One  of  the  most  astonishing  things  revealed  by  the  new 
techniques  of  radioelement  dating  is,  as  we  have  seen,  the 
rapid  rate  of  the  growth  both  of  the  present  ice  sheet  in 
Antarctica  and  of  the  last  great  icecap  in  North  America. 
Even  before  the  new  knowledge  was  available,  however, 
various  authorities  had  agreed  that  there  must  be  a  consid- 
erable lag  between  the  growth  of  an  ice  sheet  and  the  adjust- 
ment of  the  crust  to  it  by  subcrustal  flow  of  the  plastic  rock 
out  from  under  the  glaciated  tract.  The  geologist  Wilhelm 
Ramsay,  referring  to  this  lag,  said: 

...  As  the  icecaps  grew  bigger  and  thicker,  they  loaded  more 
and  more  the  areas  occupied  by  them.  The  crust  of  the  earth  gave 
way,  and  began  to  sink,  but  not  in  the  proportion  that  the  loads 
increased  (352:246). 

Ramsay  pointed  out  that  the  "rebound"  of  the  crust  follow- 
ing the  removal  of  the  ice  still  continues  thousands  of  years 
after  the  end  of  the  ice  age,  showing  how  slowly  the  crust 
adjusts.  Daly  also  referred  to  this  lag: 

Owing  to  the  stiffness  of  the  earth's  materials  and  the  sluggish- 
ness of  their  response  to  deforming  forces,  the  basin  [around  the 
Baltic]  persisted  long  after  the  ice  melted  away.  The  lower  parts  of 
Scandinavia  and  Finland  were  kept  submerged  under  the  sea.  .  .  . 
(97^90). 

According  to  Daly,  the  present  isostatic  distortion  in  the 
center  of  the  area  once  occupied  by  the  great  Scandinavian 
ice  sheet  is  the  equivalent  of  "a  plate  of  granite  with  a 
thickness  of  160  to  270  meters  of  rock"  (97:386-87).  This 
amounts  to  about  three  times  as  much  ice.  Thus  it  would 
amount  to  an  ice  sheet  between  1,500  and  2,500  feet  thick, 
and  this  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  isostatic  adjustment  has 
theoretically  been  proceeding  in  that  area  for  perhaps  15,000 


i6s  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

years.  If  we  assume  that  the  lag  was  the  same  during  the 
growth  of  the  icecap,  we  can  see  that  there  may  have  been 
an  enormous  excess  of  matter  on  the  crust  when  the  Scandi- 
navian icecap  reached  its  apogee. 

In  another  way,  Daly  shows  how  slowly  the  compensating 
flow  that  permits  adjustment  takes  place.  He  refers  to  the 
fact  that  erosion  from  a  continent  or  large  island  appears  to 
create  negative  anomalies  (deficiencies  of  mass)  on  the  land 
and  positive  anomalies  in  the  sea  (97:297-98).  This  is  so 
because  the  crust  does  not  adjust  as  rapidly  as  erosion  takes 
place.  Yet  we  can  easily  see  that  the  accumulation  of  ice  is 
faster  than  the  weathering  of  rock  and  the  deposition  of 
sediments  in  the  sea. 

The  geophysicist  Beno  Gutenberg  has  made  a  number 
of  statements  that  strongly  support  the  same  conclusion.  In 
discussing  the  zone  within  the  earth  where  adjustment  is 
carried  on,  he  says: 

...  It  is  inferred  that  this  depth  represents  (in  geologically 
stable  regions)  the  critical  level  below  which  strain  is  nearly  reduced 
to  zero  by  subcrustal  flow  in  periods  of,  say,  100,000  years  (194:316). 

The  period  of  100,000  years  indicated  by  Gutenberg  ap- 
pears to  be  a  multiple  of  the  time  required  for  the  growth  of 
a  vast  continental  icecap.  In  another  place,  he  refers  directly 
to  the  lag  between  the  growth  or  retreat  of  an  ice  sheet  and 
the  adjustment  of  the  crust.  After  listing  other  ways  in  which 
the  isostatic  balance  of  the  crust  may  be  disturbed,  he  adds: 

A  probable  instance  ...  is  the  lag  in  complete  compensation 
of  the  load  provided  by  the  Pleistocene  ice  sheets.  This  is  shown  by 
the  recoil  of  the  tracts  unloaded  by  the  melting  of  the  ice  (194:319). 

He  remarks,  further: 

The  processes  by  which  isostasy  is  maintained  must  be  extremely 
slow,  and  consequently,  this  equilibrium  is  liable  to  disturbance  by 
geological  events  (194:318). 

Gutenberg  and  Richter,  in  their  volume  on  The  Sets- 
mici'y  of  the  Earth,  express  the  known  facts  about  adjust- 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  163 

ment  within  the  rigid  crust  itself.  They  remark:  ".  .  .  it 
requires  several  thousand  years  for  the  strains  due  to  the  re- 
moval of  the  ice  load  to  be  reduced  to  half"  (195:101).  This 
and  the  preceding  statements  may  serve  to  establish  the  rea- 
sonable presumption  that  any  icecap,  at  the  height  of  its 
rapid  accumulation,  must  be  largely  uncompensated. 

But  even  if,  during  the  rapid  growth  of  the  present  An- 
tarctic icecap,  a  degree  of  isostatic  adjustment  has  taken 
place,  this  does  not  end  the  matter  for  us.  We  must  ask, 
Where  does  this  plastic  rock  go?  Presumably  it  flows  out, 
under  the  crust  below  the  ocean  bed,  beyond  the  fringes  of 
the  ice-covered  continent,  at  a  depth  of  twenty  to  forty  miles 
below  the  surface  of  the  earth.  It  may  raise  the  crust  some- 
what for  a  distance  beyond  the  edges  of  the  ice  sheet.  Dr. 
Harold  Jeffreys  gave  it  as  his  opinion  that,  if  a  gravity  survey 
of  Antarctica  should  be  undertaken,  we  might  expect  to 
find  marked  positive  anomalies  around  the  coasts  (241).  But, 
since  in  general  the  plastic  rock  under  the  crust  is  not  flowing 
into  any  area  of  deficient  mass,  the  flow,  upraising  the  coasts 
or  the  sea  bottoms  off  the  coasts,  must  still  constitute  excess 
matter,  and  must  exert  a  centrifugal  effect  about  equal  to 
the  former  effect  of  the  ice  that  has  now  been  brought  into 
equilibrium. 

Let  us  consider  this  point  a  little  further.  We  have  noted, 
above,  that  according  to  the  definition  of  isostasy,  the  process 
is  a  response  to  the  transfer  of  material  from  one  region  to 
another:  sediment  is  removed  from  an  area  of  "denudation" 
and  transferred  to  an  area  of  "deposition."  The  area  of  dep- 
osition, then,  sinks  under  the  load,  and  a  flow  of  rock  under 
the  crust  moves  back  to  the  area  of  denudation,  compen- 
sating for  the  material  that  has  been  removed,  and  restoring 
the  equilibrium.  But  where  can  the  plastic  rock  displaced 
by  the  icecap  flow?  No  adjacent  area  ha$  been  lightened  by 
the  removal  of  sediment;  the  plastic  rocK  must,  then,  wher- 
ever it  flows,  create  a  distortion,  a  surplus  of  matter,  which 
will  have  a  centrifugal  effect. 

From  the  standpoint  of  the  theory  presented  in  this  book, 


164  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

it  makes  no  difference  whether  the  excess  mass  that  creates 
the  centrifugal  effect  is  constituted  of  ice  or  whether  it  is  in 
part  constituted  of  rock.  It  may  be  concluded,  therefore,  that 
the  isostatic  process  itself  is  ineffective  in  counteracting  the 
centrifugal  effects  of  icecaps. 

We  may  conclude,  then,  first  that  the  rate  at  which  isostasy 
may  work  is  too  slow  to  keep  up  with  the  deposition  of  the 
ice;  and  second,  that  in  so  far  as  it  does  work  it  will  not  elimi- 
nate the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  uncompensated  mass,  but 
will  merely  substitute  rock  for  ice. 


2.  The  Antarctic  Icecap  Is  Growing 

The  theory  presented  in  this  book  requires,  of  course,  that  a 
polar  icecap  should  grow,  and  continue  to  grow,  though  not 
perhaps  steadily,  until  it  is  big  enough  to  move  the  crust.  In 
this  connection  it  is  important  to  examine  certain  current 
ideas  about  the  Antarctic  icecap. 

It  is  widely  believed  that  the  Antarctic  icecap,  like  some 
ice  fields  in  the  Northern  Hemisphere,  is  in  recession,  and 
was  once  greater  than  it  is  now.  This  is  a  mistaken  impres- 
sion, the  error  of  which  can  be  easily  shown,  even  without 
any  more  data  from  Antarctica.  I  will  venture  to  remark, 
indeed,  that  any  further  data  from  that  continent  are  likely 
to  show  that  the  icecap  there  is  in  a  phase  of  rapid  expansion. 

I  will  begin  with  the  northern  ice  fields,  about  which  more 
is  known.  There  is  no  doubt  that  most  of  them  are  melting, 
but  the  exceptions  are  very  significant.  These  include  the 
Greenland  icecap,  which  appears  to  be  holding  its  own 
(after  having  considerably  expanded  since  the  Viking  settle- 
ments there  during  the  Middle  Ages),  and  the  Baffinland 
icecap,  which  is  growing.  The  mountain  glaciers  of  the  Amer- 
ican northwest  have,  apparently,  started  a  readvance  (329). 
The  most  important  fact  regarding  those  northern  ice  fields 
that  have  been  in  retreat  is  that  their  retreat  began  only 
about  the  year  1850,  and  that,  before  that,  they  were  expand- 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  165 

ing  generally  for  about  300  years.  Between  1550  and  1850 
the  old  Viking  settlements  in  Greenland  were  overwhelmed 
by  the  advancing  ice.  From  this  it  follows  that  the  present 
trend  in  the  northern  ice  fields  is  not  a  long-term  trend,  but 
only  an  oscillation.  Therefore,  it  must  not  be  deduced  that 
we  are  just  getting  out  of  a  glacial  period,  and  that  all  ice 
fields  are  retreating  and  will  continue  to  retreat. 

Recent  weather  research  has  made  it  plain  that  alternating 
climatic  phases  of  slightly  colder  or  warmer  temperatures 
have  been  the  rule  for  some  thousands  of  years.  Such  phases 
would  have  no  connection  with  any  movement  of  the  earth's 
crust,  but  are  probably  related  to  varying  atmospheric  fac- 
tors, such  as  slight  variations  in  the  amount  of  volcanic  dust 
in  the  air,  or  short-term  sunspot  cycles.  It  is  known  that  the 
warmest  phase  of  the  climate,  since  the  ice  age,  occurred 
between  6,000  and  4,000  years  ago.  This  did  have  a  connec- 
tion with  the  most  recent  displacement  of  the  crust,  as  I  will 
show  later  on.  This  warm  period  is  in  itself  sufficient  evi- 
dence that  there  has  been  no  steady  warming  of  the  climate 
since  the  icecaps  melted. 

It  is  even  true  that  a  slight  warming  of  the  climate,  such 
as  appears  to  have  occurred  since  about  1850,  may  increase 
precipitation  of  snow  on  the  Antarctic  continent.  This  sug- 
gestion has  been  advanced  by  a  number  of  meteorologists.  It 
is  based  on  the  following  reasoning:  The  Antarctic  average 
temperature  is  much  colder  than  that  of  the  Arctic.  A  slight 
warming  of  world  temperatures  will  increase  the  amount  of 
the  humidity  in  the  atmosphere.  In  northern  regions,  the  in- 
creased humidity  in  the  world's  atmosphere  may  result  in 
increased  rainfall,  while  in  Antarctica,  because  of  the  lower 
temperature,  the  increased  precipitation  may  mean  increased 
snowfall. 

Up  to  the  present  time,  only  one  impressive  body  of  evi- 
dence has  been  produced  to  prove  that  the  Antarctic  icecap 
has  receded  from  a  former  greater  extent.  This  evidence  con- 
sists of  numerous  indications  of  ice  action  on  the  barren 
sides  of  Antarctic  mountains  as  much  as  1,000  feet  above  the 


i66  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

present  levels  of  the  ice.  As  matters  stood  before  the  develop- 
ment of  nuclear  methods  of  precision  dating,  this  evidence 
appeared  conclusive.  It  certainly  argued  strongly  that  the 
icecap  was  greater  in  the  past. 

We  are  now  able  to  take  a  different  view  of  the  matter. 
Now  we  know  that  this  icecap  is  largely  of  very  recent  growth. 
We  know,  too,  that  before  a  preceding  temperate  age  in 
Antarctica  there  was  another  icecap,  and  that  there  were 
several  icecaps  during  the  comparatively  short  period  of  the 
Pleistocene  alone.  We  can  assume,  moreover,  that  the  ice 
centers  of  the  different  ice  sheets  were  in  different  places,  so 
that  the  distribution  of  the  ice— its  thickness  in  different 
places— would  be  different  from  now,  even  if  the  total  amount 
of  ice  were  about  the  same.  (See  Figure  VII.) 

If  the  question  is  asked,  Cannot  we  tell  from  the  appear- 
ance of  the  striations,  and  other  evidences  of  ice  action  on 
the  Antarctic  mountainsides,  how  long  ago  they  were  made?, 
the  answer  is  No.  The  processes  of  weathering  and  erosion 
in  Antarctica  are  slow.  The  striations,  even  if  they  were  very 
old,  could  look  as  if  they  were  made  yesterday.  Henry,  in  the 
White  Continent,  discussing  the  visit  of  Rear  Admiral 
Cruzen  in  1947  to  a  camp  at  Cape  Evans  that  had  been  aban- 
doned by  Scott  more  than  thirty-five  years  before,  throws 
some  light  on  this  peculiarity  of  Antarctica: 

.  .  .  From  the  camp's  appearance,  the  occupant  might  have  left 
only  within  the  past  few  days.  Boards  and  rafters  of  the  cabin  looked 
as  if  they  had  just  come  from  the  saw  mill;  there  was  no  rot  on  the 
timbers;  not  a  speck  of  dust  on  the  nailheads.  A  hitching  rope  used 
for  Manchurian  ponies  looked  new  and  proved  as  strong  as  ever 
when  it  was  used  to  hitch  the  helicopter.  Biscuits  and  canned  meats 
still  were  edible,  though  they  seemed  to  have  lost  a  bit  of  their 
flavor.  A  sledge  dog,  which  apparently  had  frozen  to  death  while 
standing  up,  still  stood  there  looking  as  if  it  were  alive.  A  London 
magazine,  published  in  Scott's  day  and  exposed  to  the  elements  since 
his  departure,  might  have  been  printed  that  morning  (206:44). 

The  same  factors— intense  cold,  with  absence  of  the  destruc- 
tive process  of  alternate  melting  and  refreezing,  and  absence 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  167 

of  water  action,  and  the  absence  of  minute  organisms— would 
preserve  indefinitely  the  freshness  of  the  glacial  evidences. 
If  there  are  any  who  still  hesitate  to  accept  the  evidence  of 
several  successive  ice  ages  in  Antarctica  during  the  Pleisto- 
cene, let  them  remember  that  we  recognize  four  in  North 
America  and  in  Europe  during  that  period,  and  that  even 
here  it  is  not  always  easy  to  assign  glacial  evidences  to  the 
correct  glaciation. 

Once  it  is  fully  recognized  that  the  geological  evidence  of 
Antarctic  ice  recession  must  be  reinterpreted,  we  are  in  a 
better  position  to  evaluate  the  large  mass  of  evidence  now  at 
hand  regarding  the  present  accumulation  of  snow  in  Antarc- 
tica. Geologists  have  hesitated,  because  of  the  earlier  evi- 
dence, to  interpret  the  data  at  all.  Among  the  important 
items  of  information  are  the  following:  Henry  mentions  evi- 
dence of  an  accumulation  of  18  feet  of  snow  in  seven  years 
on  the  Antarctic  barrier  ice  (206:75).  The  party  that  visited 
Antarctica  on  the  icebreaker  Atka  in  1954  found  evidence  of 
the  accumulation  of  60  feet  of  snow  at  one  spot  since  1928: 

One  of  the  Atka's  three  Bell  helicopters  took  off  with  Commander 
Glen  Jacobsen,  the  ship's  captain,  as  observer.  It  landed  at  the  1928 
camp  and  found  that  one  of  the  three  towers  was  completely  buried 
in  snow  although  it  had  originally  stood  more  than  70  feet  high.  The 
two  others  barely  showed  above  the  drifts  (411). 

In  1934,  when  Byrd  made  his  second  trip  to  Antarctica,  he 
found  that  the  Ross  Shelf  ice  had  encroached  1 2  miles  on  the 
sea  since  Scott  charted  it  in  1911  and  that  there  was  much 
more  ice  in  the  Bay  of  Whales  than  when  Amundsen  visited 
it  in  1911-13.  Recently,  Bernhard  Kalb  wrote  in  the  New 
York  Times: 

.  .  .  Little  America  II— the  1933-35  base— had  been  built  directly 
on  top  of  snow  covered  Little  America  I— the  1928-30  base.  But  the 
last  twenty  years  of  snowfall  had  obliterated  that  base,  too.  The  only 
reminders  that  there  is  a  sort  of  Antarctic  Troy  entombed  in  the 
Ross  Sea  shelf— a  spectacular  table  of  glacier-fed  ice  floating  in  the 
sea,  three  times  the  size  of  New  York  State— were  two  steel  radio 
towers  and  the  tops  of  half  a  dozen  wooden  antenna  poles.  The  towers, 


168  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

dating  from  1929,  had  been  seventy  feet  high;  now  less  than  ten 
feet  of  them  could  be  seen  (246:59-60). 

The  best  evidence  for  the  rate  of  snow  accumulation  in 
Antarctica,  however,  comes  from  some  scientific  measure- 
ments taken  in  connection  with  "Operation  Highjump"  by 
the  United  States  Navy,  in  the  years  1947-48.  The  reports  of 
this  thorough  study  were  included  in  the  Army  Observer's 
Report  of  the  expedition,  and  were  made  available  to  me 
through  the  kindness  of  Admiral  Byrd.  Observations  were 
made  at  a  number  of  points;  the  snowfall  was  found  to  have 
averaged  nine  inches  per  year  since  the  previous  Byrd  expedi- 
tion (12). 

Of  course,  snow  does  not  accumulate  equally  at  all  points 
in  Antarctica.  In  many  exposed  places  it  may  not  accumulate 
at  all,  but  may  be  blown  away  by  the  wind.  In  the  interior  it 
is  reasonable  to  suppose  it  may  accumulate  at  a  slower  rate 
than  on  the  coasts.  Since  measurements  taken  in  a  few  areas 
only  may  be  seriously  misleading,  we  should  briefly  review 
the  general  factors  controlling  the  snowfall  and  snow  accu- 
mulation. 

First,  let  us  cite  the  testimony  of  a  scientist-explorer,  Nor- 
denskjold,  who  was  the  first  to  take  scientific  measurements 
of  the  snowfall  in  Antarctica.  He  also  took  temperature  rec- 
ords during  many  months.  Of  these  he  said: 

They  also  prove  that  there  is  a  tremendous  difference  between 
an  arctic  and  an  antarctic  summer  climate,  and  that  our  summer 
was  colder  than  winters  in  southern  Sweden.  But  the  temperature 
alone  does  not  give  a  true  idea  of  the  conditions  in  South  Polar 
regions,  and  the  following  example  will  serve  to  illustrate  some 
other  points  of  view.  I  had  arranged  a  row  of  bamboo  rods  on  the 
glacier,  in  order  to  measure  the  changes  in  the  height  of  the  ice  caused 
by  thawings  and  snowfalls.  During  the  winter  this  height  was  found 
to  be  constant,  and  not  the  slightest  part  of  the  snow  which  then  fell 
remained  on  the  glacier.  But  during  the  summer,  on  the  other  hand, 
the  height  of  the  snow  covering  increased  by  25  centimeters  (9.75 
inches)  and  this  amount  still  remained  when  we  left  these  tracts  one 
year  later. 

Thus  the  reader  must  imagine  a  climate  where  winter  is  as  severe 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  169 

as  winter  in  western  Siberia,  and  so  stormy  that  every  particle  of 
snow  blows  away;  where  the  summer,  even  in  the  low  latitudes 
where  we  were,  is  as  cold  as  near  the  North  Pole,  and  is,  moreover, 
such  that  snowdrifts  and  glaciers  increase  during  the  warmest  season 
of  the  year  (335- 253-54)- 

Nordenskjold's  camp,  where  he  took  these  observations, 
was,  apparently,  about  64°  S.  Lat.,  or  more  than  a  thousand 
miles  from  the  pole. 

From  this  account  it  is  evident  that  while  a  little  melting 
may  occur  from  time  to  time  in  Antarctica  (and  some  has 
been  recently  reported),  such  melting  must  be  entirely  in- 
consequential. As  to  the  quantity  of  precipitation  over  the 
whole  continent,  the  following  considerations  seem  impor- 
tant. First,  the  low  temperature  means  a  comparative  lack  of 
humidity  in  the  air;  precipitation  could  not  equal  that  in 
temperate  or  tropical  regions,  for  cold  air  will  not  hold  as 
much  moisture  as  warm  air.  Second,  wind  pattern  and  topog- 
raphy are  both  important  factors.  The  wind  pattern  is  as 
follows:  There  are  winds  blowing  toward  the  pole  at  high 
elevations;  these  have,  of  course,  crossed  oceans  on  their  way 
to  the  pole,  and  have  picked  up  moisture.  As  they  approach 
the  pole  they  are  compressed  and  chilled,  and  they  contract 
and  lose  moisture  in  the  form  of  snow.  The  air,  now  having 
greater  density,  sinks  to  the  ice  surface  and  moves  outward  in 
anticyclonic  pattern.  Winds  blow  outward  in  all  directions 
from  the  pole,  bearing  with  them  great  quantities  of  snow. 
Much  of  the  snow  is  borne  out  to  sea,  but  much  is  deposited 
in  every  nook  and  cranny,  in  all  declivities,  and,  from  the 
beginning  of  the  growth  of  the  icecap,  the  fringing  coastal 
mountain  chains  have  aided  in  the  storage  of  snow.  They  do 
not  prevent  the  high-altitude  winds,  bearing  their  moisture, 
from  entering  the  continent,  but  they  do,  naturally,  interfere 
to  some  extent  with  the  outward-flowing,  low-altitude  winds, 
forcing  them  to  deposit  snow. 

Now,  these  conditions  have  naturally  been  the  same  since 
the  beginning  of  the  growth  of  this  continental  icecap,  and 
they  must  have  prevailed  with  the  previous  icecaps.  But  we 


170  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

see  that  the  icecap  has  accumulated  nonetheless,  and  that  it 
is  now  accumulating.  Thus  we  can  safely  conclude  that  these 
anticyclonic  winds  have  not  prevented,  and  can  never  prevent, 
the  continuing  growth  of  the  ice  sheet. 

One  other  factor  may  limit  the  accumulation  of  ice.  Ice- 
bergs break  off  from  the  icecap  every  year  in  great  numbers, 
and  it  has  even  been  suggested  that  they  may  amount  to 
roughly  the  entire  annual  deposition  of  snow  upon  the  conti- 
nent. How  far  this  is  from  representing  the  true  state  of 
affairs  can  be  determined  from  the  following  considerations. 

In  the  first  place,  the  icebergs  form,  it  is  generally  agreed, 
because  the  ice  sheet  is  flowing  slowly  outward  from  the  pole 
in  all  directions,  by  the  effect  of  gravity.  The  ice  has  accumu- 
lated in  the  central  area  of  the  continent  to  a  great  but  as  yet 
unknown  depth,  and  from  this  central  area  the  surface  of  the 
ice  sheet  slopes  gently  downward  toward  the  coasts.  It  is 
recognized  that  what  sets  the  ice  sheet  in  motion  is  not  the 
slant  of  the  land  it  lies  on  (it  would  move  even  if  the  land 
were  all  flat)  but  the  angle  of  the  slope  of  its  own  surface: 
the  gradient  (87:46).  This  being  the  case,  two  factors  govern 
the  speed  of  movement:  the  more  gradual  the  gradient,  the 
slower  the  ice  flows,  while  the  colder  the  ice,  the  greater  its 
viscosity  and  its  resistance  to  movement.  Now,  in  Antarctica 
it  has  been  observed  that  the  gradient  is  only  one  third  of  the 
gradient  in  Greenland,  where,  despite  a  more  rapid  move- 
ment of  the  ice,  the  glacier  still  maintains  itself  approxi- 
mately in  a  static  condition.  The  Antarctic,  in  addition,  is 
much  colder,  and  therefore  its  ice  is  more  viscous,  more  rigid, 
more  resistant  to  motion.  What  the  temperatures  deep  in  the 
icecap  are  is  at  present  unknown,  but  they  are  probably  con- 
siderably lower  than  those  in  the  northern  glaciers.  Coleman 
notes  how  much  slower  is  the  movement  of  ice  in  Antarctica 
than  it  is  in  Greenland  (87:44).  (See  n.  i,  p.  192.) 

Brown  has  correctly  pointed  out  that  a  large  production  of 
icebergs,  such  as  we  note  in  Antarctica,  is  a  sign  of  an  expand- 
ing glacier,  while  a  dwindling  supply  of  icebergs  is  evidence 
of  an  icecap  in  decline  (54).  Einstein  was  of  the  opinion  that 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  171 

the  flow-off  of  icebergs  could  not  even  be  an  important  factor 
in  reducing  the  rate  of  the  annual  increment  of  ice  on  the 
glacier  (128).  The  general  problem  of  the  Antarctic  icecap 
may  be  summarized  thus: 

First,  we  know  that  there  is  never  any  considerable  melting 
of  snow  in  Antarctica.  We  have  radioelement  evidence  of  an 
enormous  expansion  of  the  icecap  there  in  recent  millennia. 
We  also  have  evidence  that  it  is  now  accumulating.  We  can 
add  that  studies  carried  out  by  Captain  Charles  W.  Thomas, 
of  the  United  States  Coast  Guard,  of  the  radiolaria  (minute 
organisms)  contained  in  samples  of  bottom  sediments  from 
the  Antarctic  have  recently  convinced  him  that  * 'during  the 
last  5,000  years  the  waters  surrounding  this  continent  (Ant- 
arctica) have  been  getting  colder"  (411)  just  as  would  have 
to  be  expected  with  a  growing  icecap. 

Secondly,  if  Antarctica  has  always  been  at  the  South  Pole, 
what  conceivable  factor  could  have  operated  to  prevent  the 
formation  of  an  icecap  there  until  the  comparatively  recent 
Eocene  Period,  only  about  60,000,000  years  ago?  Once  an 
icecap  had  formed,  what  other  factor  could  have  interrupted 
the  glaciation,  so  as  to  bring  about  the  growth  of  luxuriant 
forests  there  in  later  periods?  Since  it  has  been  shown  that 
climatic  zones  like  the  present  have  clearly  existed  during 
the  whole  of  geological  history  (Chapter  III),  would  we  not 
be  justified  in  expecting  the  icecap  to  have  accumulated  con- 
tinuously in  Antarctica  at  least  since  the  first  known  pre- 
Cambrian  ice  age,  about  two  billion  years  ago? 

Thirdly,  Campbell  has  made  the  significant  observation 
that  the  Antarctic  icecap  never  melts,  yet  we  know  that  ice 
sheets  elsewhere  on  the  globe  have  melted  again  and  again. 
It  has  proved  impossible  to  account  for  the  ice  sheets  that 
once  existed  and  melted  away  in  areas  now  near  the  equator. 
Campbell  points  out  that  even  if  the  rate  of  snowfall  in 
Antarctica  is  low  compared  with  the  precipitation  in  warmer 
climates,  yet  the  icecap  has,  in  the  oceans,  an  unlimited  sup- 
ply. It  follows  that,  if  the  present  icecap  is  not  large  enough 


172  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

to  start  a  movement  of  the  crust,  it  will  simply  continue  to 
grow,  drawing  upon  the  endless  resources  of  the  oceans  until 
it  is  big  enough. 


3.  A  Suggestion  from  Einstein 

From  the  foregoing,  it  is  clear  that  there  is  a  basis  for  the 
presumption  that  the  Antarctic  icecap  is  largely  an  uncom- 
pensated  mass  (an  extra  weight  on  the  surface  of  the  earth), 
that  it  has  grown  continuously  since  the  disappearance  of 
nonglacial  conditions  in  the  Ross  Sea  area  only  a  few 
thousand  years  ago,  and  that  it  is  growing  now.  Einstein 
recognized,  in  the  Foreword  to  this  book,  the  centrifugal 
momentum  that  such  an  uncompensated  mass,  situated  eccen- 
trically to  the  pole,  would  create  when  acted  upon  by  the 
earth's  rotation,  and  he  saw  that  the  centrifugal  momentum 
would  be  transmitted  to  the  crust.  But  he  also  raised,  in  the 
last  paragraph  of  the  Foreword,  another  interesting  question. 
If  an  icecap  can  have  such  an  effect,  so  can  any  other  uncom- 
pensated mass.  It  is  necessary  to  investigate  any  existing  dis- 
tortions within  the  crust  itself  and  to  learn  whether  it  may 
contain  uncompensated  masses  of  a  magnitude  comparable  to 
the  Antarctic  icecap,  and  thus  capable  of  causing  comparable 
centrifugal  effects.  For  the  inference  is  obvious:  if  such  masses 
are  in  existence,  but  have  not  moved  the  crust,  it  follows  that 
the  crust  may  be  anchored  too  solidly  to  be  moved  by  the 
centrifugal  effect  of  icecaps. 

One  of  the  troubles  with  the  theory  of  isostasy  is  that  the 
failures  of  the  crust  to  adapt  to  gravitational  balance  have 
been  found  to  be  more  numerous  and  more  serious  than  ex- 
pected. Daly  lists  and  discusses  a  large  number  of  them.  It 
appears,  for  example,  that  the  whole  chain  of  the  Hawaiian 
Islands,  with  their  undersea  connecting  masses  of  heavy 
basalt,  are  uncompensated  (97:303).  These  islands  rise  from 
the  deep  floor  of  the  Pacific,  and  their  peaks  tower  two  and  a 
half  miles  above  sea  level.  Their  gigantic  weight  rests  upon 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  173 

the  crust,  and  under  the  weight  the  crust  has  bent  down 
slightly,  but  it  has  not  given  way.  This  is  the  more  remark- 
able since  the  islands  appear  to  be  several  million  years  old. 
It  indicates  that  at  this  point  the  earth's  crust  is  strong 
enough  to  bear  a  very  considerable  weight  without  yielding. 
The  Great  Rift  Valley  of  Africa,  which  we  have  already  dis- 
cussed, is  uncompensated,  despite  its  great  age  (97:221). 
There  are  also  enormous  anomalies  in  the  East  Indies.  Ac- 
cording to  Umbgrove,  Vening  Meinesz  found  that  the  nega- 
tive anomalies  (that  is,  the  deficiency  of  matter)  in  the  great 
ocean  deeps  in  that  area  and  the  positive  anomalies  on  each 
side  caused  a  total  gravity  deviation  of  400  milligals.  One 
milligal,  according  to  Daly,  would  amount  to  about  10 
meters  of  granite  (97:394),  so  that  the  total  deflection  of  the 
crust  from  gravitational  balance  here  would  amount  to  4,000 
meters  of  granite,  or,  roughly,  three  miles  of  granite,  which, 
in  turn,  would  be  the  equivalent  of  an  ice  sheet  about  nine 
miles  thick.  And  the  crust  has  borne  this  enormous  strain, 
apparently,  for  some  millions  of  years.  According  to  Daly, 
the  Nero  Deep,  near  the  island  of  Guam,  has  deviations  from 
gravitational  balance  of  the  same  magnitude  (97:291).  Among 
uncompensated  features  on  the  lands  are  the  Harz  Moun- 
tains, in  Germany  (97:349),  and  the  Himalayas,  which  stand 
about  864  feet  higher  than  they  should  (97:235).  A  particu- 
larly interesting  case  is  that  of  the  island  of  Cyprus,  of  consid- 
erable size,  which  stands  about  one  kilometer,  or  3,000  feet, 
higher  than  it  should,  and  yet  shows  no  signs  of  subsiding. 
Daly  says: 

From  Mace's  table  of  anomalies  and  from  his  map,  it  appears 
that  we  have  here  a  sector  of  the  earth,  measuring  more  than  225 
kilometers  in  length  and  100  kilometers  in  width,  and  bearing  an  un- 
compensated load  equal  to  one  kilometer  of  granite,  spread  evenly 
over  the  sector.  .  .  .  (97:212-13). 

These  facts  would  appear  to  argue  a  very  considerable 
strength  of  the  crust  to  resist  the  pressure  toward  establish- 
ment of  gravitational,  or  isostatic,  balance.  However,  in  all 
the  cases  so  far  mentioned  it  is  true  that  the  deviations  have 


174  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

occurred  in  comparatively  narrow  areas.  The  Hawaiian 
Islands,  for  example,  represent  a  long,  narrow  segment  of  the 
crust.  Obviously  the  crust  can  support  loads  with  small  span 
more  easily  than  loads  with  a  very  great  span.  These  devia- 
tions, therefore,  may  not  tell  us  much  about  the  gravitational 
status  of  the  Antarctic  icecap,  which,  of  course,  has  an  enor- 
mous span,  since  it  covers  a  whole  continent.  Since  they  are 
insignificant  quantitatively  as  compared  with  the  possible 
effect  of  the  continental  icecap  of  Antarctica,  they  will  not, 
of  themselves,  answer  Einstein's  question. 

Of  more  importance  are  isostatic  anomalies  of  broad  span, 
and  these  are,  surprisingly,  quite  plentiful.  Daly  mentions 
one  along  the  Pacific  coast.  This  is  a  negative  anomaly— 
a  deficiency  of  mass.  Daly  explains  that  according  to  one 
formula  (the  "International  Formula"),  it  covers  an  area 
2,100  miles  long,  and  360  to  660  miles  wide;  according  to 
another  formula  (the  "Heiskanen"),  it  is  reduced  to  one  half 
both  in  intensity  and  in  extent  (97*371).  Taking  the  lesser  es- 
timate, the  deficiency  of  mass  over  this  large  area  still  amounts 
to  the  equivalent  of  a  continuous  ice  sheet  1,000  to  1,200  feet 
thick.  So  it  appears  that  over  this  large  span  the  crust  can  bear 
that  amount  of  negative  weight  (that  is,  of  pressure  from  with- 
in the  earth)  without  giving  way,  at  least  for  a  short  period  of 
time.  In  other  parts  of  the  United  States  there  are  positive 
anomalies  of  the  same  magnitude,  and  these  obtain  over  large 
areas. 

A  far  more  extraordinary  case  is  an  enormous  area  of  nega- 
tive mass  that  covers  part  of  India  and  most  of  the  adjacent 
Arabian  Sea.  The  width  of  the  negative  area  in  India  is  780 
miles.  Daly,  after  noting  the  challenge  presented  by  this 
fact  to  the  whole  theory  of  isostasy,  goes  on  to  say: 

The  situation  becomes  even  more  thought  provoking  when  we 
remember  that  Vening  Meinesz  found  negative  Hayford  anomalies 
all  across  the  Arabian  Sea,  2500  kilometers  in  width.  Apparently, 
therefore,  negative  anomalies  here  dominate  over  a  total  area  much 
greater  than,  for  example,  the  huge  glaciated  tract  of  Fenno-Scandia 
[Finland  and  Scandinavia].  And  yet  there  is  no  evidence  that  the 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  175 

lithosphere  under  India  and  the  Arabian  Sea  is  being  upwarped. 
The  fact  that  Fenno-Scandia,  though  less  (negatively)  loaded  than  the 
Arabian  Sea-India  region,  is  being  upwarped,  as  if  by  isostatic  adjust- 
ment, emphasizes  the  need  to  examine  the  Asiatic  field  with  particular 
care.  .  .  .  (97-365)- 

Let  us  remember  that  a  negative  load  means  simply  pres- 
sure from  within  the  earth  outwards,  and  positive  load  pres- 
sure from  the  surface  inward.  In  principle,  they  are  the  same 
in  so  far  as  their  evidence  for  the  strength  of  the  crust  goes. 
It  seems  that  here  the  crust  is  quite  able  to  bear  a  large  load 
over  a  great  span  without  yielding.  Daly  points  out  that  many 
parts  of  India  are  distorted  on  the  positive  side;  there  is  an 
excess  of  matter  over  considerable  areas,  and  he  remarks: 

.  .  .  India,  among  all  the  extensive  regions  with  relatively  close 
networks  of  plumb-bob  and  gravity  stations,  is  being  regarded  by 
some  high  authorities  as  departing  so  far  from  isostasy  that  one 
should  no  longer  recognize  a  principle  of  isostasy  at  all.  .  .  .  (97:224- 
*5). 

A  particularly  important  aspect  of  these  great  deviations 
from  gravitational  balance  of  the  crust  in  India  is  that  they 
are  not  local  distortions,  not  the  result  of  local  surface  fea- 
tures such  as  hills  and  valleys.  These  surface  features  may 
well  once,  and  quite  recently,  have  been  in  good  isostatic  bal- 
ance. The  distortion  lies  deeper: 

...  In  India  practically  all  the  gravity  anomalies  seem  to  have 
no  apparent  relation  to  local  conditions.  Only  one  explanation 
seems  possible— that  is,  that  they  are  due  to  a  very  deep  seated  gentle 
undulation  of  the  lower  crustal  layers  underlying  all  the  super- 
ficial rocks;  it  is  evidently  a  very  uniform,  broad  sweeping  feature 
at  a  great  depth,  and  must  be  uncompensated,  since  if  it  were 
compensated  it  would  cause  no  anomaly  at  the  surface  (97:241-42). 

Forced  to  find  some  way  of  explaining  how  the  crust  could 
bear  such  loads  (positive  and  negative)  in  India  and  still  yield 
easily  to  isostatic  adjustment  in  other  areas,  Daly  suggests 
that  the  strength  of  the  crust  in  India  might  be  explained  by 
a  recent  lateral  compression  of  the  whole  peninsula,  which, 


176  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

he  says,  is  evidenced  by  the  folding  there  of  the  young  sedi- 
mentary rocks  (97:391-92). 

Daly  does  not  suggest  a  possible  cause  for  this  lateral  com- 
pression of  the  whole  peninsula;  such  a  compression,  part  of 
the  process  of  mountain  building,  he  has  already  character- 
ized as  "utterly  mysterious."  But  it  must  be  clear  that  it  is 
precisely  the  type  of  distortion  that  might  be  expected  to  re- 
sult from  a  displacement  of  the  earth's  crust.  Such  a  move- 
ment could  very  well  account  both  for  the  depression  of 
lower  India  and  for  the  uncompensated  elevation  of  the 
Himalayas.  It  can  be  said,  moreover,  that  no  displacement  of 
the  crust  could  possibly  take  place  without  creating,  at  some 
points  on  the  earth,  precisely  such  deep-lying  gentle  undula- 
tions of  the  crust. 

But  still  another  point  may  be  urged  in  support  of  this 
solution  of  the  problem.  We  shall  see,  later  on,  that  the  last 
movement  of  the  crust  appears  to  have  been  approximately 
along  the  goth  meridian,  with  North  America  moving  south- 
ward from  the  pole.  This  movement  would  have  subjected 
India  to  maximum  displacement  and  to  maximum  compres- 
sion. In  this  last  movement  India  would  have  been  moved 
across  the  equator  and  northward  toward  the  pole,  to  its 
present  latitude. 

Daly's  suggestion  that  compression  may  increase  the  tensile 
strength  of  the  crust  opens  up  most  interesting  possibilities. 
We  may  find  here,  in  connection  with  the  theory  of  crust  dis- 
placement, a  solution  to  very  puzzling  problems  of  isostatic 
theory.  The  crust  of  the  earth  shows  enormous  differences 
from  place  to  place  in  its  degree  of  isostatic  adjustment  and 
in  its  sensitivity  to  the  addition  or  removal  of  loads.  Apply- 
ing Daly's  suggestion,  we  may  infer  that  the  differences  may 
owe  their  origin  to  recent  displacements  of  the  crust.  Areas 
recently  moved  poleward,  having  undergone  compression 
and  still  retaining  compression,  would,  according  to  Daly's 
suggestion,  have  greater  strength  to  sustain  the  distortions; 
areas  recently  displaced  equatorward,  having  undergone 
extension,  or  stretching,  would  have  less  strength  to  resist 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  177 

gravitational  adjustment,  and,  moreover,  the  widespread 
fracturing  accompanying  the  movement  would  facilitate  ad- 
justment. 

This  suggestion  of  Daly's  also  has  great  significance  for  the 
understanding  of  the  absence  of  much  volcanism  in  the  polar 
regions.  It  has  been  observed  that  these  regions  are  relatively 
quiet,  with  respect  to  volcanoes.  There  is  only  one  volcano  in 
the  whole  continent  of  Antarctica,  so  far  as  we  know.  What 
can  be  the  reason  for  this?  It  may  be  thought  that  this  may 
result  from  the  polar  cold,  but  this  cannot  be  true.  The  influ- 
ence of  surface  temperatures  penetrates  only  a  short  distance 
into  the  crust;  volcanoes  originate  from  greater  depths.  The 
solution  may  be  found  in  the  fact  that,  according  to  our 
theory,  both  the  present  polar  areas  are  areas  that  were 
moved  poleward  in  the  last  movement  of  the  crust,  and  were 
therefore  compressed.  Consequently,  the  crust  in  those  areas 
was  less  fractured  and  now  has  greater  strength  to  prevent 
volcanic  action.  This  increased  strength  may  also  have  the 
effect  of  adding  to  the  ability  of  the  crust  to  sustain  the  in- 
creasing weight  of  the  icecap,  without  giving  way,  thus  tend- 
ing to  add  to  the  uncompensated  proportion  of  the  icecap.  In 
addition,  Antarctica  may  well  show  isostatic  distortions  of 
the  crust  itself,  equivalent  to  the  positive  anomalies  in  India. 

The  importance  of  finding  a  reasonable  solution  for  the 
profound  contradictions  in  the  theory  of  isostasy  has  been 
emphasized  by  several  recent  writers.  Professor  Bain,  of  Am- 
herst,  writes: 

Isostatic  adjustment  exists  only  in  imagination.  I  present  the  ex- 
istence of  peneplains  in  witness  thereof.  Establishment  of  the 
Rocky  Mountain  peneplain  or  the  Old  Flat  Top  Peneplain  of  the 
western  states  requires  erosion  of  at  least  10,000  feet  of  the  rock  over 
the  main  arch  of  the  Front  Range.  The  rivers  wore  the  land  down 
slowly  to  grade  equilibrium  without  observable  rise  of  the  unloaded 
region  or  subsidence  of  the  loaded  region  throwing  all  gravity  out 
of  equilibrium.  Then  in  the  brief  interval  of  a  small  part  of  a 
geological  epoch  the  land  surface  rose  to  re-establish  near  gravity 
equilibrium.  .  .  .  (19). 


178  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

Now,  as  I  understand  Professor  Bain's  statement,  his  point 
is  that  in  numerous  instances  erosion  has  worn  away  moun- 
tain ranges,  leaving  flat  plains  (peneplains),  and  in  the  in- 
stance he  cites  it  seems  that  during  the  prolonged  period 
when  the  erosion  was  taking  place  (erosion  that  resulted  in 
removal  of  no  less  than  10,000  feet  of  rock  from  one  area,  and 
the  deposition  of  the  resulting  sediments  in  another),  the 
crust  did  not  respond  by  rising  in  the  first  area  and  sinking 
in  the  second.  Gravitational  balance  was  thus  sadly  set  askew, 
and  remained  so  for  a  long  time.  Then,  relatively  suddenly, 
equilibrium  was  re-established.  How  do  we  explain  this? 

I  think  it  is  necessary  to  take  into  consideration  the  fact 
that  just  as  compression  will  be  at  a  maximum  along  the 
meridian  of  displacement  of  the  crust  in  the  poleward  direc- 
tion, extension  or  stretching  will  likewise  be  at  a  maximum 
along  the  same  meridian  in  the  equatorward  direction.  But, 
in  both  cases,  areas  removed  from  this  meridian  will  be  dis- 
placed proportionately  less,  and  large  areas  will  undergo  very 
little  or  no  displacement,  and  consequently  very  little  or  no 
compression  or  extension.  Since,  as  we  saw  in  the  last  chapter, 
successive  movements  of  the  crust  may  oscillate  along  merid- 
ians placed  close  together,  it  follows  that,  for  long  periods, 
compression  may  be  sustained  in  particular  areas  and  isostatic 
adjustment  impeded  in  those  areas.  Eventually,  a  movement 
of  the  crust  in  a  different  direction  will  permit  the  delayed 
adjustment  to  take  place. 

In  this  way,  too,  we  may  explain  the  data  upon  which  Dr. 
Jeffreys  based  his  conclusion  that  isostasy  is  an  exceptional 
condition  of  the  earth's  surface,  which  is  re-established  only 
at  long  intervals.  The  theory  presented  in  this  book  offers  a 
solution  for  the  cause  of  the  geological  revolutions  which, 
he  supposed,  shattered  the  crust  at  long  intervals,  bringing 
about  the  formation  of  mountains,  and  permitting  the  re- 
establishment  of  crustal  balance. 

With  regard  to  the  vast  negative  or  positive  distortions  of 
isostasy,  the  displacement  theory  has  a  solution  to  offer.  Let 
us  suppose  a  movement  of  the  crust  causing  widespread  slight 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  179 

distortion  of  the  earth  from  its  equilibrium  shape,  distortion 
such  as  now  prevails  across  parts  of  India  and  all  of  the 
Arabian  Sea.  It  is  essential  to  realize  that  the  long  persistence 
of  such  anomalies,  and  the  apparent  lack  of  any  tendency  to 
adjustment,  may  have  no  relationship  to  the  strength  of  the 
crust.  It  may  be  due,  quite  simply,  to  the  fact  that  the  matter 
in  the  sublayer  (the  asthenosphere)  is  too  viscous  to  flow 
rapidly,  and  that  when  it  has  to  flow  such  great  distances,  and 
in  such  great  volume  as  would  be  required  to  compensate  the 
sweeping  undulations  of  the  geoid  caused  by  a  movement  of 
the  crust,  great  periods  of  time  are  required,  periods  so  long 
that  our  instruments  have  not  been  able  to  detect  the  progress 
of  isostatic  adjustment. 

The  advantage  of  the  theory  of  crust  displacements  is  that 
it  can  reconcile  the  data  supporting  the  conviction  of  geolo- 
gists that  the  crust  must  be  too  weak  to  support  major  loads 
out  of  adjustment  over  great  spans  of  territory,  with  the  ob- 
served fact  that  in  some  cases  it  appears  to  do  so.  Further- 
more, we  may,  with  this  theory,  grant  the  crust  enough 
strength  under  certain  conditions  (of  compression)  to  sup- 
port heavy  loads  of  narrow  span,  such  as  the  Hawaiian 
Islands,  and  still  understand  its  extreme  weakness  in  areas  of 
extension,  where  it  appears  to  adjust  easily  to  rather  minor 
loads. 

Einstein,  in  the  Foreword,  referred  to  the  possible  centrif- 
ugal effects  of  these  distortions  within  the  crust.  The  follow- 
ing principles  apply: 

a.  A  positive  load  on  the  crust,  like  the  icecap,  will  exert  a 
centrifugal   effect   equatorward;    correspondingly,    the 
effects  of  negative  loads  must  be  poleward. 

b.  The  effects  of  positive  loads  on  one  side  of  the  equator 
will  be  opposed  to  the  effects  of  positive  loads  on  the 
other  side  of  the  equator;  equal  positive  loads  in  equal 
longitudes  and  latitudes  will  cancel  each  other  across  the 
equator,  and  the  same  is  true  of  negative  loads. 


i8o  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

c.  Despite  the  fact  that  such  loads  may  cancel  each  other 
wholly  or  in  part,  in  so  far  as  the  transmission  of  a  net 
centrifugal  momentum  to  the  crust  in  any  given  direc- 
tion is  concerned,  nevertheless  their  opposition  will  in- 
volve the  creation  of  persisting  stresses  in  the  crust,  and 
these  may  be  a  cause  of  seismic  activity. 

d.  Crustal  distortions,  unlike  icecaps,  are  comparatively 
permanent  features;  many  may  persist  through  one  or 
more  displacements;  their  effect  will  change  quantita- 
tively according  to  their  changes  of  latitude  and  longi- 
tude. 

e.  At  the  termination  of  each  crustal  movement,  the  dis- 
tortions of  the  rock  structures  of  the  crust  should  be 
approximately  balanced  across  the  equator.  In  a  period 
of  several  thousand  years  following  such  a  movement, 
however,  the  process  of  isostatic  adjustment,  proceeding 
faster  in  some  areas  than  in  others,  may  disturb  this 
balance  and  predispose  the  crust  to  a  new  displacement. 

f.  We  may  conclude,  in  answer  to  the  question  raised  in 
the  Foreword,  that  while  some  of  these  distortions  are 
massive,  they  tend  to  be  balanced  across  the  equator, 
and   that   the   principal   disturbing   factor,   from   the 
quantitative  standpoint,  must  in  all  probability  be  the 
rapidly  growing  continental  icecap. 


4.  The  Triaxial  Shape  of  the  Earth 

We  cannot  leave  the  subject  of  the  gravitational  adjustment 
of  the  earth's  surface  without  mentioning  the  greatest  dis- 
tortion of  all,  the  triaxial  deformation  of  the  earth.  It  is  all 
the  more  important  to  consider  this  question  since  here  we 
shall  see,  at  one  and  the  same  time,  a  solution  for  one  of  the 
greatest  of  geological  conundrums,  and  one  of  the  most 
powerful  arguments  in  support  of  the  theory  of  displace- 
ments of  the  earth's  crust. 

Not  long  ago,  scientists  became  aware  of  the  fact  that  there 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  l8l 

is  a  deviation  in  the  shape  of  the  earth  from  the  idealized 
form  of  a  flattened,  or  oblate,  spheroid.  The  increasingly 
accurate  measurements  of  geodesy  have  shown  that  the  earth 
has  bumps  and  irregular  lumps  in  various  places,  which  seem 
to  correspond  to  a  third  axis  running  through  the  earth.  As 
a  result  of  this,  scientists  now  consider  that  the  true  shape 
of  the  earth  is  that  of  a  "triaxial  ellipsoid." 

An  axis,  of  course,  is  not  a  material  thing.  It  is  only  a  line 
that  somebody  imagines  running  through  a  sphere  to  give  a 
dimension  to  that  sphere  in  that  direction.  Three  axes  of  the 
earth  mean  one  through  the  poles,  on  which  the  earth  rotates 
(the  axis  of  rotation);  one  through  the  equator,  called  the 
equatorial  axis,  twenty-six  miles  longer  than  the  polar  axis; 
and  now  a  third  axis,  roughly  through  the  equator,  at  an 
angle  to  the  other  equatorial  axis. 

The  result  of  having  two  axes  of  different  lengths  running 
through  the  equator  is,  of  course,  that  the  equator  itself  is  a 
little  flattened;  it  is  oval,  rather  than  truly  circular.  The  flat- 
tening is  very  slight.  According  to  Daly,  one  axis  through  the 
equator  is  2,300  feet  longer  than  the  other  (97:32);  Jeffreys, 
according  to  Daly,  prefers  half  that  figure.  Daly  finds  that  the 
longer  diameter  through  the  equator  (the  major  axis)  runs 
from  the  Atlantic  Ocean,  at  25°  W.  Long.,  to  the  Pacific,  at 
155°  E.  Long.,  and  the  shorter  diameter  (or  minor  axis)  runs 
from  the  western  United  States,  at  115°  W.  Long.,  to  the 
Indian  Ocean,  at  65°  E.  Long.  (97:32).  Just  as  the  actual 
amount  of  the  flattening  of  the  equator  is  uncertain,  so  are 
the  precise  situations  of  the  major  and  minor  equatorial 
axes.  More  recently,  determinations  by  the  United  States 
Coast  Geodetic  Survey  have  suggested  a  slightly  different 
position  for  one  of  these  axes.  Moreover,  the  third  axis  ap- 
parently does  not  run  precisely  through  the  equator.  The 
result  is  that  the  earth's  shape  is  distorted  by  protuberances 
of  various  sizes  and  shapes.  If  we  take  Jeffreys's  estimate  of 
their  magnitude,  we  see  that  they  amount  to  the  equivalent 
of  about  2,000  feet  of  rock,  or  over  a  mile  of  ice,  and  of 


182  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

course  the  anomalies  have  enormous  spans,  on  the  order  of 
thousands  of  miles. 

Despite  their  vastly  greater  magnitude,  these  triaxial  pro- 
tuberances have  one  thing  in  common  with  those  in  India. 
Just  as  Daly  observed  that  the  Indian  anomalies  must  result 
from  sweeping  undulations  of  the  geoid  at  some  depth  in  the 
crust,  underlying  all  the  surface  features,  so  do  the  triaxial 
protuberances  indicate  distortion  in  depth  rather  than  at  the 
surface.  In  India  the  surface  features  would  be  in  fairly 
good  isostatic  adjustment  if  the  deep-seated  undulations  were 
disregarded,  while  the  geodesist  Heiskanen,  according  to 
Daly,  found  that  if  he  disregarded  the  triaxial  protuberances 
—if  he  regarded  the  triaxial  ellipsoid  as  the  natural  shape  of 
the  earth— all  his  anomalies  were  reduced  to  one  half,  both 
in  extent  and  in  intensity  (97:368). 

It  does  not  seem  reasonable  simply  to  disregard  distortions 
of  the  shape  of  the  earth  of  this  magnitude,  unless  we  have  an 
explanation  of  them  that  is  convincing.  Daly  provided  an  ex- 
planation, but  for  a  number  of  reasons  it  seems  to  me  unsatis- 
factory. 

It  was  plain  to  him  that  the  strength  of  the  crust  could 
not  possibly  support  such  enormous  distortions  over  such 
spans.  Therefore  he  made  one  or  two  alternative  suggestions, 
advancing  them  as  possibilities  only.  He  suggested,  first,  that 
assuming  an  original  molten  condition  of  the  earth,  it  is 
possible  that  the  material  in  the  liquid  melt  was  not  of  uni- 
form density  on  opposite  sides  of  the  earth,  and  that  there- 
fore when  the  mesosphere  (the  inner  solid  shell  underlying 
the  asthenosphere)  solidified,  it  was  heavier  on  one  side  than 
on  the  other— that  is,  lopsided— and  the  resulting  unevenness 
of  gravity  at  the  surface  influenced  the  equilibrium,  that  is, 
the  elevation  from  place  to  place,  of  the  surface  layers.  This 
is  an  ingenious  suggestion,  but  it  requires  the  assumption  of 
the  cooling  of  the  earth,  which  is  itself  doubtful.  Thus  this 
particular  explanation  rests  upon  speculation,  and  upon 
speculation  that  is  not  well  supported. 

The  same  is  true  of  Professor  Daly's  second  suggestion.  He 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  183 

supposes  that  the  lopsidedness  of  the  internal  shell  may  have 
resulted  from  the  separation  of  the  moon  from  the  earth,  at 
which  time  the  bed  of  the  Pacific  may  have  been  created. 
The  arguments  that  once  supported  this  theory  of  the  origin 
of  the  moon  have,  in  recent  years,  been  gradually  whittled 
away,  until  little  remains  of  them.  This,  then,  is  also  a  haz- 
ardous speculation. 

Professor  Daly's  fertile  mind  has  produced  a  third  sugges- 
tion. He  feels  that  perhaps  the  triaxiality  may  have  resulted 
from  the  effects  of  continental  drift,  which  he  felt  himself 
compelled  to  support  because  there  was  no  other  way  to  ex- 
plain the  innumerable  facts  of  paleontology  and  geology, 
many  of  which  have  been  already  cited  in  this  book.  We  have 
seen,  however,  that  continental  drift  will  not  do. 

It  seems  that  all  the  arguments  that  Professor  Daly  uses  to 
support  his  suggestion  that  the  triaxial  protuberances  are  not 
supported  by  the  crust,  but  from  below  the  crust,  fail  to  stand 
examination.  They  are  supported  by  no  convincing  mass  of 
evidence.  There  is  obviously  a  sort  of  desperate  urgency 
about  them.  A  strong  need  impels  him  to  hoist  them  up.  The 
nature  of  this  need  is  perfectly  clear. 

The  need  is  to  save  the  theory  of  isostasy.  It  is  to  smooth 
the  path  in  front  of  a  theory  that  has  a  lot  of  useful  applica- 
tions and  has  a  great  deal  to  be  said  for  it.  The  theory  is 
threatened  by  the  unexplained  anomalies  referred  to  above; 
it  is  still  more  threatened  by  these  massive  distortions  of 
the  shape  of  the  planet,  the  triaxial  protuberances.  They  are 
wholly  and  absolutely  irreconcilable  with  the  known  prin- 
ciples of  physics,  as  opposed  to  speculations.  Either  the  shape 
of  the  earth  is  established  by  the  balance  of  the  force  of  grav- 
ity and  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  rotation,  or  it  is  not.  The 
geoid,  so  established,  is  distorted,  and  it  proves  impossible 
to  explain  the  distortion  either  by  the  resistance  of  the  crust 
to  the  aforementioned  forces  or  by  the  (undemonstrated)  lop- 
sidedness of  the  internal  shell. 

But  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  may  explain  the 
matter,  and  in  the  simplest  possible  fashion. 


184  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

We  have  seen  that  areas  displaced  poleward  in  a  movement 
of  the  crust  will  be  elevated  relatively  to  sea  level.  Two  areas 
will  be  displaced  poleward  at  the  same  time,  one  to  each  pole, 
and  both  will  be  elevated  somewhat  with  reference  to  the 
equilibrium  surface.  The  distance  through  the  earth  between 
these  points  will  be  increased  slightly.  At  the  same  time,  two 
other  areas  will  be  displaced  equatorward.  They  will  subside, 
and  the  diameter  through  the  earth  between  them  will  be 
shortened  to  some  extent.  These  areas  will  be  centered  on 
the  meridian  of  the  movement  of  the  crust.  At  90  degrees' 
remove  on  each  side  from  this  meridian,  there  will  be  no 
movement;  here  are  the  so-called  "pivot  areas*'  that  do  not 
change  their  latitude.  They  will  therefore  not  change  their 
elevation:  a  diameter  through  the  earth  between  them  will 
be  unchanged. 

As  the  consequence  of  this,  we  see  that  in  one  direction 
the  diameter  of  the  earth  through  the  equator  is  shortened; 
in  the  other  direction  through  the  equator  it  is  not.  The  re- 
sult must  inevitably  be  the  ellipticity,  or  ovalarity,  of  the 
equator. 

The  consequences  of  the  displacement  do  not  end  here.  As 
we  have  stated  from  time  to  time,  much  complicated  folding 
and  faulting  of  the  crust,  much  shifting  of  matter  below  the 
crust,  would  be  inevitable  or  likely,  and  these  would  have 
effects  at  the  surface,  including  basining  and  doming.  Hence, 
some  of  the  protuberances  now  being  discovered  may  have 
nothing  to  do  with  the  triaxial  distortions,  and  may  simply 
be  confused  with  them. 

Now,  it  is  clear  that  this  explanation  of  the  triaxiality  re- 
quires neither  complicated  and  hazardous  speculations  about 
the  earth's  interior  nor  an  incredible  strength  in  the  earth's 
crust.  The  protuberances  remain  because  the  matter  below 
the  crust  is  too  highly  viscous  to  flow  the  great  distances  and 
in  the  great  volume  that  would  be  required  to  re-establish 
the  normal  shape  of  the  earth:  that  is,  it  is  too  viscous  to  have 
been  able  to  do  so  in  the  very  short  period  that  has  elapsed 
since  the  last  movement  of  the  crust.  But  no  doubt  the  read- 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  185 

justment  is  proceeding  slowly;  no  doubt  the  triaxial  bumps 
are  now  the  reduced  remnants  of  those  that  existed  at  the 
end  of  the  last  movement  of  the  crust. 

If  all  anomalies  in  the  crust  cause  centrifugal  effects,  then 
these  vast  triaxial  protuberances  must  do  so.  These  must,  as 
I  have  pointed  out,  be  balanced  across  the  equator,  or  have 
been  so  at  the  termination  of  the  last  movement.  Since  then, 
isostatic  adjustment  has  probably  been  proceeding,  and 
therefore  the  balance  of  forces  established  when  the  crust 
stopped  moving  may  now  no  longer  exist.  The  instability  of 
the  crust  may  have  been  thereby  increased,  and  the  effects  of 
its  instability  may  supplement  the  increasing  thrust  of  the 
growing,  eccentric  icecap.  This  suggests  that  the  balance  of 
the  crust  in  its  present  position  may  be  only  a  "trigger  bal- 
ance." 


5.  The  State  of  Matter  Below  the  Crust 

The  theory  presented  in  this  book  depends  upon  the  rela- 
tionship between  three  factors:  the  quantity  of  the  momen- 
tum transmitted  to  the  crust  by  the  icecap,  the  tensile 
strength  of  the  crust,  and  the  degree  of  weakness  prevailing 
in  the  subcrustal  layer,  or  asthenosphere.  In  Einstein's  opin- 
ion, the  existence  of  sufficient  weakness  in  the  asthenosphere 
to  permit  the  displacement  of  the  crust  was  the  only  doubtful 
assumption  of  the  theory.  However,  we  find  that  one  and  the 
same  assumption  is  required  for  this  theory,  and  for  the 
whole  theory  of  isostasy.  It  is  my  opinion  that  the  theories 
stand  or  fall  together. 

In  conceiving  of  the  asthenosphere,  we  should  not  imagine 
a  layer  of  soft  rock  distinguished  from  the  crust  and  from  the 
inner  shells  of  the  earth  by  sharp  lines  of  demarcation.  In- 
stead, one  grades  off  insensibly  into  another,  and  in  all  prob- 
ability inequalities  in  thickness  exist  from  place  to  place. 

It  is  the  general  opinion  of  geophysicists  that  at  a  certain 
depth  in  the  crust  increasing  heat  and  pressure  bring  about  a 


i86  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

diminution  of  the  tensile  strength  and  rigidity  of  the  rock. 
The  decline  of  strength  continues  to  the  bottom  of  the  crust. 
Dr.  Jeffreys  remarks:  ".  .  .  At  some  depth  ...  it  begins  to 
decrease  and  may  be  a  tenth  of  that  of  surface  rock  at  a  depth 
of  30  miles.  .  .  ."  (238:202). 

At  the  bottom  of  the  crust,  perhaps  about  36  miles  be- 
low the  surface  of  the  earth,  an  important  change  of  state 
apparently  takes  place.  The  heat  reaches  the  melting  point 
of  the  rocks,  and  the  rocks  can  no  longer  crystallize.  Since  the 
strength  of  rocks  depends  mostly  upon  a  structure  of  strong, 
interlocking  crystals,  the  change  of  state  implies  a  disappear- 
ance of  strength.  For  this  reason  Professor  Daly  considers  the 
asthenosphere  to  be  "essentially  liquid/'  ".  .  .  For  it  is 
hardly  to  be  doubted  that  a  rock  layer,  too  hot  to  crystallize, 
has  only  a  minute  strength,  or  no  strength  whatever"  (97:399- 
400). 

Jeffreys  is  in  agreement  that  the  melting  point  of  rock 
should  be  reached  about  36  miles  down  (238:140),  judging 
from  the  heat  gradient. 

If  it  were  only  a  question  of  the  crystalline  or  noncrystal- 
line  structure  of  the  rock,  we  would  readily  conclude  that 
the  asthenosphere  could  offer  no  serious  resistance  to  the  dis- 
placement of  the  crust.  The  crust  would  be  truly  (to  use  Ein- 
stein's term)  a  "floating  crust." 

But  we  must  also  take  into  account  another  quality  of  mat- 
ter, which  is  viscosity.  Materials  possess  varying  degrees  of 
viscosity.  Viscosity  can  make  a  liquid  act  like  a  solid.  If,  for 
example,  a  high  diver  hits  the  surface  of  the  water  at  a  bad 
angle  he  may  kill  himself,  because  the  water,  though  liquid, 
requires  time  to  flow,  and  if  the  impact  is  too  sudden  there 
is  no  flow  and  the  liquid  acts  as  a  solid.  Tar  is  an  example 
of  a  more  viscous  substance.  Taffy  candy  is  highly  viscous, 
and  can  be  cut  with  scissors,  and  yet,  given  a  certain  amount 
of  time,  it  will  flow  like  a  liquid.  The  effect  of  pressure  on 
different  substances  is  to  increase  their  viscosity,  to  make 
them  stiffer.  They  will  then  resist  sudden  shocks  better,  but 
will  flow  like  liquids  if  subjected  to  steady  pressure  for  a  con- 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  187 

siderable  period  of  time.  The  layer  immediately  under  the 
earth's  crust  is  subjected  to  high  pressure,  and  therefore, 
although  it  is  liquid,  it  may  be  stiff.  The  stiffness  can  be  ex- 
pected to  be  least  immediately  under  the  crust,  and  to  in- 
crease with  increasing  depth. 

However,  it  cannot  be  assumed  that  the  viscosity  imme- 
diately under  the  crust  is  very  great.  Bridgman  has  pointed 
out  that  it  depends  to  a  great  extent  on  the  particular  chem- 
ical composition  of  the  rocks,  which  necessarily  is  uncertain 
(50).  Moreover,  though  pressure  increases  viscosity,  heat 
diminishes  it,  again  differently  for  different  chemical  sub- 
stances. It  is  difficult  to  estimate  the  net  effect  of  the  opera- 
tion of  these  opposite  influences  at  any  point  under  the  crust. 

Daly  presents  evidence  that  the  viscosity  of  the  astheno- 
sphere  must  be  very  low.  He  cites,  first,  evidence  from  the 
edges  of  the  area  recently  occupied  by  the  Scandinavian  ice- 
cap. According  to  isostatic  principles,  viscous  rock  must  have 
flowed  out  from  under  the  section  of  the  crust  loaded  by  the 
icecap.  If  the  rock  was  very  stiff,  Daly  argues,  it  would  not 
have  flowed  very  far,  but  would  have  upheaved  the  crust 
around  the  fringes  of  the  ice  sheet.  Evidences  of  such  up- 
heaval should  be  observable,  but  there  are  none.  He  thinks 
that  there  should  have  been  an  upheaval  of  the  Lithuanian 
plain,  but  none  occurred.  Hence  his  conclusion  is  that  the 
asthenosphere  must  have  low  viscosity:  ".  .  .  And  there  is 
no  apparent  necessity  for  excluding  the  possibility  of  effec- 
tively zero  strength*'  (97:389). 

The  meaning  of  this  geological  evidence  appears  to  be 
that  the  asthenosphere  must  be  a  true  liquid  in  terms  of 
pressure  applied  over  periods  of  the  length  required  for  the 
growth  of  the  Scandinavian  icecap,  which  would  be  the  same 
length  of  time  that  we  suppose  would  be  involved  in  a  dis- 
placement of  the  crust. 

As  a  second  line  of  evidence  for  a  weak  sublayer,  Daly 
points  out  (as  already  mentioned)  that  in  mountain  making 
the  crust  is  folded  to  its  full  depth,  that  horizontal  sliding  has 
to  occur  to  permit  this  folding,  and  that  horizontal  sliding 


188  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

would  be  impossible  if  the  asthenosphere  had  any  consider- 
able strength.  In  his  opinion  mountain  formation  requires 
the  existence  of  a  zone  of  easy  shear. 

Thirdly,  Daly  urges  the  importance  of  the  general  body 
of  evidence  of  igneous  geology: 

.  .  .  The  existence  of  a  liquid  or  approximately  liquid  astheno- 
sphere is  strongly  suggested  by  the  countless  facts  of  igneous  geology. 
The  hypothesis  that  the  lithosphere  is  crystalline,  a  few  scores  of 
kilometers  in  maximum  thickness,  and  everywhere  underlain  by  a 
hot  vitreous  substratum  provides  what  appears  to  be  the  best  work- 
ing theory  of  the  chemical  nature  of  magmas  and  their  modes  of 
eruption.  ...  In  general,  no  petro-genetic  theory  that  does  not  rec- 
ognize a  specific  world-encircling  asthenosphere  of  this  kind  has 
been  found  to  explain  so  many  facts  of  the  field.  .  .  .  (97:399-400). 

Among  specific  evidences  that  point,  in  Daly's  opinion,  to  a 
really  liquid  asthenosphere  are  the  plateau  basalts,  which, 
as  we  have  seen,  were  formed  by  immense  floods  of  liquid 
magma  that  engulfed  hundreds  of  thousands  of  square  miles 
of  the  surface  at  one  time. 

Jeffreys  opposes  Daly's  view  of  the  asthenosphere,  and  ar- 
gues for  continuation  of  considerable  strength  to  a  depth  of 
several  hundred  miles.  Daly  notes  his  argument,  and  an- 
swers it. 

Jeffreys's  argument  is  based  on  the  fact  that  an  analysis  of 
earthquake  waves  shows  that  some  earthquakes  originate  at 
depths  up  to  420  miles  below  the  surface.  Presumably,  they 
can  originate  only  as  the  result  of  fracture  in  a  solid  substance, 
which  necessarily  would  have  some  strength.  Daly  remarks: 

For  example,  Jeffreys  deduces,  from  the  reality  of  deep-focus  shocks, 
a  strength  of  about  1000  kilograms  per  square  centimeter  for  the 
material  reaching  down  to  the  7oo-kilometer  level  at  least.  This 
is  about  the  strength  of  good  granite  in  the  testing  machine. 

To  reconcile  that  conclusion  with  the  demonstrated  degree  of 
isostatic  equilibrium,  Jeffreys  suggests  that  isostasy  is  a  highly  ex- 
ceptional condition  of  the  earth.  He  assumes  the  condition  to  have 
been  established  during  major  orogenic  disturbances,  and  preserved 
for  only  a  relatively  short  time  after  each  paroxysm  of  mountain- 
making  (97:400-01). 


It  is  not  easy  to  reconcile  Jeffreys's  views  here  with  those 
:  his  I  have  quoted  above  regarding  the  decline  of  strength 
:  rock  with  increasing  pressure  in  the  crust.  It  is  evident 
iat  if  Jeffreys  is  right,  the  theory  of  isostasy  is  reduced  to 
shambles.  But  Daly  presents  a  counterargument  to  show 
iat  he  is  not  right.  He  suggests  that  at  great  depths  the  vis- 
>sity  would  be  so  high  that  a  comparatively  sudden  ac- 
imulation  of  strain  from  some  cause  could  fracture  the  rock 
if  it  were  a  solid.  Laboratory  experiments  conducted  by 
ridgman  have  shown  that  solids  subjected  to  pressures  so 
•eat  as  to  make  them  flow  behaved  in  very  peculiar  fashion, 
hey  would  flow,  but  the  flow  would,  at  times,  be  interrupted 
f  fracture  and  slip.  Daly  also  quotes  Gutenberg  to  the  effect 
iat  ".  .  .  Whereas  at  normal  depths  the  accumulation  of 
rain  is  made  possible  by  the  strength  of  the  rocks,  at  the 
•eater  depths  the  high  coefficient  of  viscosity  is  sufficient, 
id  no  conclusion  as  to  strength  can  be  drawn"  (97:403). 
hus  the  counterargument  is  a  strong  one.  All  that  is  neces- 
ry,  in  fact,  both  for  the  theory  of  isostasy  and  for  the  theory 
:  displacements  of  the  crust  is  a  thin  layer  of  extreme  weak- 
*ss  at  the  top  of  the  asthenosphere,  where  the  viscosity 
ould  be  much  less  than  at  the  greater  depths. 
According  to  Daly,  Jeffreys  adopted  his  view  because  he 
>uld  see  no  reason  for  the  development  of  sudden  stresses 
the  greater  depths.  Daly  argues  that  this  cannot  settle  the 
atter;  perhaps  we  shall  eventually  discover  a  sufficient 
Luse.  Daly  also  says,  when  speaking  of  the  earth's  triaxiality, 
iat  it  means  "stress  at  depths  of  thousands  of  kilometers" 
7:404).  Putting  two  and  two  together,  I  would  suggest  that 
ie  deep-focus  earthquakes  result  from  the  triaxiality,  and 
iat  the  stresses  develop  suddenly  enough  to  exceed  the  lim- 
5  of  the  viscosity  at  that  depth  and  cause  fracture,  because 
te  triaxial  bulges  are  not  permanent  features  of  the  planet, 
it  recent  deformations,  which  must  set  up  strains  at  con- 
ierable  depths. 
Archibald  Geikie  describes  experiments  done  a  long  time 


190  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

ago,  which  are  still  suggestive  of  the  probable  behavior  of 
material  in  the  asthenosphere: 

The  ingenious  experiments  of  M.  Tresca  on  the  flow  of  solids 
have  thrown  considerable  light  on  the  internal  deformations  of  rock- 
masses.  He  has  proved  that,  even  at  ordinary  atmospheric  tempera- 
tures, solid  resisting  bodies  like  lead,  cast  iron,  and  ice  may  be  so 
compressed  as  to  undergo  an  internal  motion  of  their  parts,  closely 
analogous  to  that  of  fluids.  Thus  a  solid  jet  of  lead  has  been  pro- 
duced, by  placing  a  piece  of  the  metal  between  the  jaws  of  a  power- 
ful compressing  machine.  Iron,  in  like  manner,  has  been  forced  to 
flow  in  the  solid  state  into  cavities  and  take  their  shape.  On  cutting 
sections  of  the  metal  so  compressed,  their  particles  of  crystals  are 
found  to  have  arranged  themselves  in  lines  of  flow  which  follow 
the  contours  of  the  space  into  which  they  have  been  squeezed.  .  .  . 
(170:316). 

It  seems  altogether  unlikely  that  material  under  the  pres- 
sures prevailing  at  the  bottom  of  the  crust,  and  at  very  high 
temperatures,  could  resist  the  shearing  movement  of  the  crust 
over  it.  Let  us  remember  that  in  a  displacement  of  the  crust 
very  little  material,  comparatively  speaking,  would  actually 
have  to  flow.  The  crust  would  simply  start  to  slip  over  the 
asthenosphere.  The  action  would  be  one  of  gliding,  the  most 
economical  form  of  motion,  though,  as  already  explained, 
the  downward  protuberances  of  continents  and  mountain 
chains  might  act  to  slow  down  the  movement. 

To  conclude,  then,  the  asthenosphere  could  have  consid- 
erable viscosity,  even  at  the  top,  and  yet  offer  no  definite 
obstacle  to  the  displacement  of  the  crust.  Once  the  crust 
started  to  move,  the  braking  influence  of  the  viscosity  would 
steadily  decline,  for  with  the  increasing  distance  of  the  cen- 
ter of  mass  of  the  icecap  from  the  axis,  the  centrifugal  effect 
would  be  multiplied  (Chapter  XII).  No  friction  between  the 
two  layers  could  suffice  to  absorb  this  ever  increasing  thrust. 
It  would  have  to  continue  until  the  motive  force  was  re- 
moved by  the  melting  of  the  icecap  in  the  warmer  latitudes. 
And,  in  the  meantime,  as  Frankland  has  suggested,  the  fric- 
tion would  have  been  productive  of  heat  that  might  have 
further  facilitated  the  movement. 


THE  SHAPE  OF  THE  EARTH  1Q1 

I  have  not  referred  to  another  important  aspect  of  the  be- 
havior of  materials  under  pressure,  one  that  may  have  its 
importance.  If  the  viscosity  of  matter  increases  with  pressure, 
so  does  plasticity.  Solids  become  more  and  more  plastic  under 
pressure.  At  the  bottom  of  the  crust  matter  is  under  enor- 
mous pressure.  That  means  that  very  little  force  may  be  re- 
quired to  overcome  its  rigidity.  It  also  means  that  when  a 
critical  point  is  reached,  the  material  may  deform  suddenly. 
It  does  not  give  way  at  a  speed  proportional  to  the  pressure 
applied,  as  khthe  case  of  a  viscous  liquid,  but  at  a  speed  that 
has  no  relationship  to  the  applied  force.  Bridgman  has 
pointed  out  that  the  exact  degree  of  plasticity  at  the  bottom 
of  the  crust,  like  that  of  the  viscosity,  cannot  be  determined 
because  of  our  ignorance  of  the  chemical  composition  of  the 
materials. 

This  question  of  plastic  deformation  raises  an  interesting 
possibility.  What  if,  at  a  certain  point  in  the  displacement, 
viscous  deformation  gives  way  to  plastic  deformation?  Sup- 
pose the  movement  starts  slowly  as  a  gliding  over  a  viscous 
surface.  Suppose  it  gains  enough  speed  so  that,  at  the  inter- 
face between  the  crust  and  the  underlying  plastic  layer,  a 
plastic  type  of  yielding  occurs.  The  interactions  here  would 
be  complex,  but  the  possibility  looms  that  at  times  the  dis- 
placement of  the  crust  could  take  place  with  considerable 
speed. 

I  have  mentioned  that  the  gliding  motion  of  the  crust 
might  be  impeded  at  times  by  the  downward  projections  of 
its  undersurface.  However,  if  there  is  one  situation  in  which 
plastic  deformation  might  be  considered  probable,  it  is  one 
in  which  these  downward  projections— for  example,  the  un- 
derbody  of  a  continent— were  displaced  against  upward  pro- 
jections of  the  asthenosphere  under  the  ocean  basins.  Here 
considerable  pressures  would  arise,  and  various  circumstances 
might  concentrate  these  pressures  in  narrow  regions  and  in- 
tensify them;  the  pressures  might  thus  reach  the  critical 
point  of  plastic  deformation,  and  result  in  the  abrupt  shear- 
ing off  of  larger  or  smaller  segments  of  the  downward  pro- 


192  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

jections  of  the  crust—the  roots  of  continents  and  mountain 
ranges.  This  would  result  in  comparatively  sudden  changes 
at  the  surface,  at  least  in  areas  being  moved  equatorward  and 
thus  stretched  and  weakened.  It  would  also  facilitate  the 
process  of  planing  off  and  shaping  the  continental  sides  as 
suggested  in  the  last  chapter.1 

i  Newspaper  reports  of  observations  now  being  made  in  Antarctica,  as  part  of 
the  scientific  program  of  the  present  International  Geophysical  Year,  indicate 
a  depth  for  the  ice  sheet  at  the  South  Pole  of  about  8,000  feet.  This  suggests 
that  Campbell  and  I  may  have  considerably  underestimated  the  total  mass 
and  weight  of  the  icecap.  At  the  same  time,  the  reports  suggest  very  low  pre- 
vailing temperatures,  and  therefore  high  rigidity,  for  the  ice,  at  some  depth 
below  the  surface.  (See  p.  170.) 


VII  :  NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE 


In  the  preceding  chapters  much  evidence  has  been  presented 
to  support  the  contention  that  the  earth's  crust  has  often 
been  displaced.  Perhaps  the  reader  will  feel  that  the  general 
evidence  is  sufficient.  It  remains,  nonetheless,  to  show  be- 
yond a  reasonable  doubt  that  such  a  movement  actually  did 
occur  in  one  specific  instance.  I  have  already  suggested  that 
the  last  movement  may  have  been  the  immediate  cause  of 
the  end  of  the  last  ice  age  in  North  America  and  in  Europe. 
In  this  chapter  I  will  review  the  evidence  for  this.  At  the 
same  time,  I  will  try  to  show  why  the  circumstances  of 
the  displacement  themselves  indicate  and,  in  fact,  require  the 
further  conclusion  that  the  icecap  in  North  America  must 
itself  have  been  the  agent  of  the  displacement. 


/.  The  Polar  Icecap 

Several  independent  lines  of  evidence,  each  individually  ex- 
tremely impressive,  unite  to  suggest  that  the  Hudson  Bay 
region  lay  at  the  North  Pole  during  the  so-called  Wisconsin 
glaciation. 

The  first  line  of  evidence  is  based  on  the  shape,  and  on 
the  peculiar  geographical  position,  of  the  last  North  Amer- 
ican icecap.  Kelly  and  Dachille  point  out  that  the  area  occu- 
pied by  the  ice  was  similar  both  in  shape  and  in  size  to  the 
present  Arctic  Circle  (248:39).  Many  geologists  have  re- 
marked on  the  unnatural  location  of  the  icecap.  It  occupied 
the  northeastern  rather  than  the  northern  half  of  the  con- 
tinent. Some  of  the  northern  islands  in  the  Arctic  Ocean, 
and  northern  Greenland,  were  left  unglaciated  (87:28,  note). 
Alaska  and  the  Yukon  had  mountain  glaciers  but  no  con- 
tinuous ice  sheet.  Then,  the  ice  is  known  to  have  been  thicker 


194  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

and  to  have  extended  farther  south  on  the  low  central  plains 
of  the  Mississippi  Valley  than  it  did  on  the  high  mountain 
areas  in  the  same  latitudes  farther  west.  But  according  to  ac- 
cepted ideas  about  glaciation,  if  the  ice  age  was  the  result  of 
a  general  lowering  of  world  temperatures,  the  ice  should 
have  formed  first  in  the  mountain  areas,  and  it  should  have 
extended  farther  south  on  them  than  in  the  low  plains. 
There  has  been  no  explanation  of  this,  which  may  have  been 
one  of  the  problems  that  led  Daly  to  remark  that  "The  Pleis- 
tocene history  of  North  America  holds  ten  major  mysteries 
for  every  one  that  has  already  been  solved"  (93:111). 

The  assumption  that  the  Hudson  Bay  region  then  lay  at 
the  pole  would  make  the  facts  easy  to  explain,  for  in  this  case 
the  western  highlands  would  lie  to  the  south  of  the  plains 
region,  and  one  would  therefore  expect  thicker  ice  on  the 
plains  lying  nearer  the  pole.  Absence  of  continuous  glacia- 
tion in  Alaska  and  in  the  Arctic  islands  would  be  easily  ex- 
plained. Furthermore,  the  fact  that  the  European  ice  sheet 
was  thinner  than  the  North  American  and  did  not  extend 
so  far  south  would  be  understandable.  The  relationship  be- 
tween the  North  American  and  contemporary  European 
glaciations  will  be  discussed  further  below. 

A  second  line  of  evidence  for  the  position  of  North  Amer- 
ica at  the  pole  consists  of  the  new  data  regarding  recent 
climatic  change  in  Antarctica,  already  discussed  (Chapter  II). 
A  movement  of  the  crust  that  would  move  North  America 
southward  about  2,000  miles  would  also  necessarily  move 
Antarctica  that  much  nearer  the  South  Pole  (see  globe). 
Therefore,  a  displacement  of  the  crust  accounts  both  for  the 
deglaciation  of  North  America  and  for  the  expansion  of  the 
icecap  in  Antarctica,  and  it  accounts  for  the  two  events  being 
simultaneous.  No  other  hypothesis  so  far  suggested  can  ac- 
count for  climatic  revolutions  in  opposite  directions  on  the 
two  continents.  No  assumption  of  ice  ages  resulting  from  a 
simultaneous  world-wide  reduction  of  temperature  will  fit 
the  facts.  In  a  personal  interview,  I  once  asked  Einstein  if 


NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE 

he  could  see  any  logical  alternative  to  crust  displacement 
as  the  explanation  of  these  facts.  He  replied  that  he  was  per- 
suaded of  the  soundness  of  the  method  of  crust  radioelement 
dating  developed  by  Professor  Urry,  and  that  he  saw  no  other 
reasonable  explanation  of  the  evidence  (see  page  364).  A  third 
line  of  evidence  is  that  presented  by  Dr.  Pauly,  already  dis- 
cussed (Chapter  III). 

A  fourth  line  of  argument  is  developed  by  Lawrence  Dil- 
lon, who  shows,  first,  that  the  essential  condition  governing 
the  growth  of  ice  sheets  seems  to  be  not  the  average  year- 
around  temperature,  nor  the  amount  of  annual  precipitation, 
but  the  mean  summer  temperature  (114:167).  He  points  out 
that  no  ice  sheets  form  at  the  present  time  in  areas  with  mean 
summer  temperatures  of  45°  F.  or  higher,  and  suggests  that 
they  probably  didn't  in  the  past.  He  cites,  as  a  good  illus- 
tration of  this  principle,  the  northeastern  section  of  Siberia, 
which  is  unglaciated  despite  the  fact  that  it  is  the  "cold  pole" 
of  the  world,  and  although  it  has  a  higher  annual  precipita- 
tion than  Greenland  or  Antarctica.  But  the  summer  tempera- 
ture is  high,  and  this  he  thinks  is  the  controlling  factor. 

Dillon  points  out,  next,  that  the  existence  of  the  Wisconsin 
glacier  would  have  demanded  a  decrease  of  25°  C.  in  average 
summer  temperatures  as  they  exist  now  (114:167).  But  he 
notes  that  according  to  Antevs  the  average  temperature  de- 
crease in  late  Pleistocene  time  along  the  iO5th  meridian  in 
southern  Colorado  and  northern  New  Mexico  as  compared 
with  the  present  was  only  10°  F.,  while  (according  to  Meyer) 
the  average  temperatures  during  the  glacial  period  in  the 
equatorial  Andes  were  only  5°  or  6°  F.  lower  than  at  pres- 
ent (114). 

Thus  Dillon  shows  that  there  was  no  uniform  decrease  of 
summer  temperatures  during  the  glacial  period.  No  world- 
wide factor,  such  as  variations  in  solar  radiation,  reduced  the 
temperature.  The  range  of  summer  temperatures  would  be 
understandable  if  the  ice  sheet  were  a  polar  icecap,  however, 
and  the  range  appears  to  require  that  assumption. 


196  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

...  On  the  other  hand,  the  only  apparent  alternate  hypothesis— 
that  of  a  uniform  depression  of  the  mean  temperature  of  say  10°  F. 
would  suggest  a  July  mean  of  60°  F.  for  the  ice  sheet's  lower  boundary, 
which  is  similar  to  that  of  present-day  England,  or  northern  Ger- 
many, or  the  State  of  Maine,  but  with  somewhat  colder  winters. 
Since  no  glaciers  or  permanent  snow  fields  are  known  to  exist  today 
under  such  mild  climates,  it  seems  scarcely  likely  that  they  could  have 
done  so  in  former  times  (114:168). 

Dillon  does  not  explicitly  suggest  a  movement  of  the  crust, 
but  he  leaves  no  alternative. 

A  fifth  line  of  argument  may  be  based  on  some  evidence 
used  by  Wegener  to  support  his  theory  of  drifting  conti- 
nents. He  quoted  the  glaciologist  Penck  as  saying  that  the 
Pleistocene  snowline  lay  about  1,500  to  1,800  feet  lower  in 
Tasmania  than  in  New  Zealand,  and  added,  "This  is  very  diffi- 
cult to  understand  because  of  the  present  nearly  equal 
latitudes  of  the  two  localities"  (450: 1 1 1).  Wegener,  of  course, 
explained  the  matter  by  his  theory  of  continental  drift.  If, 
however,  his  theory  is  rejected,  crust  displacement  may  pro- 
vide a  solution,  for  if  the  Hudson  Bay  region  was  then  lo- 
cated at  the  North  Pole,  as  we  suppose,  Tasmania  would 
have  been  a  good  many  degrees  nearer  the  South  Pole  than 
New  Zealand,  as  a  glance  at  the  globe  will  make  plain.  An- 
other bit  of  evidence  that  fits  in  here  is  the  apparent  retreat 
of  glaciers  in  South  Australia  about  10,000  years  ago  (16). 

A  sixth  line  of  argument  may  be  based  on  the  evidence  for 
world-wide  volcanism  at  the  end  of  the  Wisconsin  glacia- 
tion.  Extensive  volcanic  activity  is  an  inevitable  corollary 
of  a  general  movement  of  the  earth's  crust.  I  shall  present 
the  argument  that  the  volcanism  incident  to  the  movement 
accounts  for  the  numerous  oscillations  of  the  Wisconsin  ice 
sheet,  and  for  the  following  "Climatic  Optimum." 

A  seventh  line  of  evidence  is  provided  by  the  mass  of  data 
relating  to  changes  in  sea  level  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age.  I 
shall  attempt  to  show  that  these  changes  cannot  be  explained 
by  the  melting  of  the  northern  icecaps,  though  they  may  be 
explained  by  a  displacement  of  the  crust,  on  the  basis  of 
principles  already  discussed. 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  1Q7 

An  eighth  line  of  evidence  is  presented  by  the  story  of  the 
extinctions  of  many  kinds  of  animals  at  the  end  of  the  ice 
age,  and  this  is  so  important  that  it  will  require  a  chapter  by 
itself  (Chapter  VIII).  Much  additional  evidence  based  on  ma- 
rine and  land  sediments  will  also  be  presented  later  (Chap- 
ter IX). 


2.  The  Displacement  Caused  by  the  Ice  Sheet 

It  may  be  argued  that  convincing  evidence  of  a  displacement 
of  the  crust  by  no  means  requires  the  further  conclusion  that 
the  movement  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age  was  the  result  of  the 
centrifugal  effects  of  the  North  American  icecap.  A  dozen 
other  possibilities  may  be  thought  to  exist.  Several  of  them 
may  be  worth  considering.  Why,  then,  must  we  jump  to  the 
conclusion  that  the  event  was  related  causally  to  the  icecap? 
There  have  been  several  suggestions  to  account  for  shifts 
of  the  crust  by  other  agencies  than  icecaps.  What  is  the  com- 
mon element  of  these  suggestions?  It  can  easily  be  pointed 
out.  All  of  them  involve  long  periods  of  time.  Gold's  sug- 
gestion involves  periods  of  the  order  of  a  million  years. 
Bain's  involves  periods  of  a  great  many  million  years  be- 
tween movements.  Ma's  involves  long  periods  between 
movements,  terminated  by  cataclysms.  Eddington's  type  of 
displacement,  if  it  could  be  made  to  work  at  all,  would  neces- 
sarily be  very  slow.  Besides  their  common  inability  to  explain 
the  velocity  of  events  revealed  by  the  new  methods  of  radio- 
element  dating,  the  suggestions  are  unsatisfactory  also  because 
they  are  vague  as  regards  the  mechanism  of  displacement. 
They  can  be  grounded  neither  upon  detailed  observations 
nor  upon  mathematical  calculations.  The  mechanism  devel- 
oped by  Campbell,  on  the  other  hand,  is  quite  definite  and 
precise  (although  it,  too,  necessarily  must  involve  assump- 
tions). Of  special  importance  is  the  fact  that  Campbell's 
mechanism  is  capable  of  being  checked  against  geological 
observations  in  some  detail. 


198  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

To  begin  with,  it  is  clear  that  a  massive  centrifugal  effect 
must  have  been  created  by  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet,  if  the 
considerations  presented  in  Chapter  VI  are  sound.  Radioele- 
ment  dating  has  shown  that  the  ice  sheet  developed  in  a  very 
short  time.  A  high  degree  of  isostatic  compensation  of  the 
icecap  is  therefore  unlikely,  even  if  isostatic  compensation 
could  really  eliminate  the  effect. 

It  is  significant  that  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet  was  asymmet- 
rical in  its  distribution  about  the  center  from  which  it  spread. 
If  we  assume  that  the  ice  center  from  which  the  icecap 
radiated  coincided  at  that  time  with  the  pole,  then  this 
asymmetrical  distribution  must  have  resulted  in  a  centrifu- 
gal effect.  Furthermore,  it  appears  that  the  great  bulk  of  the 
ice  lay  to  the  south  of  the  ice  center,  and  so  therefore  the 
direction  of  the  resulting  centrifugal  thrust  would  have  been 
southward,  and  the  result  would  have  been  to  shift  the  Hud- 
son Bay  region  due  south  from  the  pole  toward  its  present 
latitude.  This  is  indeed  in  remarkable  agreement  with  the 
theory.  The  facts  are  reported  by  W.  F.  Tanner,  writing  in 
Science,  under  the  title  "The  North-South  Asymmetry  of  the 
Pleistocene  Ice  Sheet"  (414). 

There  are  some  comparisons  between  this  North  American 
icecap  and  the  present  icecap  in  Antarctica  that  are  worth 
making.  The  North  American  icecap  is  thought  to  have  cov- 
ered about  4,000,000  square  miles,  as  compared  with  the 
nearly  6,000,000  square  miles  of  the  present  Antarctic  cap. 
It  may  be  asked,  Why  should  the  smaller  North  American 
icecap  have  started  a  slide  of  the  earth's  crust,  when  this 
larger  one  in  Antarctica  has  not?  The  answer  to  this  appears 
to  lie  in  the  different  degrees  of  eccentricity,  or  asymmetry, 
of  the  two  icecaps.  In  Antarctica,  the  pole  is  fairly  near 
the  center  of  the  continent,  so  that  the  real  asymmetry  of  the 
icecap  is  not  at  first  glance  apparent.  In  North  America  the 
presumed  pole  in  Hudson  Bay  or  perhaps  in  western  Quebec 
was  on  the  eastern  side  of  the  continent,  quite  near  the  sea. 
In  this  situation,  the  icecap  was  more  eccentric.  Its  center 
of  gravity  was  in  all  probability  much  farther  from  the  pole 


NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE 

than  is  the  case  in  Antarctica,  and  the  centrifugal  effect  ac- 
cordingly would  have  been  much  greater  in  proportion  to 
the  quantity  of  ice. 

If  the  pole  was  situated  in  the  Hudson  Bay  region,  the 
closeness  of  the  sea  would  have  been  a  factor  aiding  the  rapid 
growth  of  the  icecap,  and  giving  less  time  for  possible 
isostatic  adjustment. 

An  additional  observation  worth  making,  perhaps,  is  that 
if  this  vast  ice  sheet  had  developed  so  rapidly  at  the  present 
latitude  of  Hudson  Bay,  the  centrifugal  effect  would  have 
been  colossal.  If  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  Antarctic  icecap, 
with  its  center  of  gravity  345  miles  from  the  pole,  is  sufficient 
to  produce  a  bursting  stress  almost  equal  to  the  estimated 
tensile  strengths  of  the  crust,  the  smaller  North  American  ice- 
cap, with  its  center  of  gravity  about  2,500  miles  from  the 
pole,  would  have  produced  a  bursting  stress  many  times 
greater  than  the  crustal  strength.  Why  this  must  be  so,  the 
reader  may  see  by  referring  to  Figure  XII  (p.  343).  On  this 
plate,  the  second  parallelogram  represents  the  centrifugal 
effect  of  the  present  Antarctic  icecap  on  the  assumption  that 
the  icecap  could  be  displaced,  without  melting,  as  far  as  the 
45th  parallel  of  latitude.  It  is  evident  that  at  the  45th  parallel 
the  centrifugal  effect  would  be  approximately  six  times 
greater  than  the  effect  produced  by  the  icecap  with  its  center 
of  mass  where  it  is  now,  about  345  miles  from  the  pole.  The 
bursting  stress  would  be  increased  in  proportion,  being  al- 
ways 500  times  the  centrifugal  effect  (Chapter  XI).  It  seems 
unreasonable  to  suppose  that  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age  the 
crust  could  have  withstood  a  stress  six  times  greater  than 
our  present  estimate  of  its  strength. 

The  reader  is  free  to  conclude  from  the  foregoing,  either 
that  the  North  American  icecap  must  have  been  a  polar  ice- 
cap (because  it  could  never  have  developed  to  its  full  size  at 
the  present  low  latitude  of  the  glaciated  region  without  mov- 
ing the  crust)  or  that  the  movement  of  the  crust  from  any 
such  agency  is  impossible.  But,  as  we  have  seen  (Chapter  VI), 


goo  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

he  would  have  trouble  in  finding  a  reasonable  basis  for  the 
latter  conclusion. 

We  can  therefore  conclude  that,  on  the  whole,  the  North 
American  icecap  is  a  good  candidate  for  the  position  of  prime 
mover  in  the  last  displacement  of  the  crust.  The  argument 
will  be  strengthened  when  we  consider,  below,  its  detailed 
history,  and  the  implications  of  the  extraordinary  tempo  of 
its  development  and  of  its  subsequent  decay.  The  essential 
argument  in  favor  of  icecaps  is  the  time  factor,  for  the  rate 
of  their  accumulation  and  of  their  melting  is  obviously  many 
times  faster  than  that  of  any  other  process  creating  unbalance 
in  the  distribution  of  materials  on  the  earth's  surface. 

Horberg  has  recently  collected  and  studied,  as  already 
mentioned,  the  radiocarbon  dates  bearing  on  the  history  of 
the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet.  According  to  him,  the  following  is 
its  short  and  violent  history  (222:281): 

a.  The  first  known  advance  of  the  icecap— its  first  ap- 
pearance in  Ohio— is  dated  at  merely  25,100  years  ago.  This 
is  called  the  "Farmdale  Advance."  It  was  formerly  thought 
to  have  occurred  as  much  as  100,000  or  even  150,000  years 
ago.  This  date,  then,  cuts  the  time  for  the  later  history  of 
the  ice  sheet  by  about  three  quarters.  Six  different  radiocar- 
bon dates,  all  of  the  Farmdale  Advance,  show  that  the  ex- 
pansion continued  until  at  least  22,900  years  ago,  or  for 
about  3,000  years.  Then  there  was  an  unexplained  interval 
of  warm  climate  (which  I  will  explain  later  on),  called  the 
"Farmdale-Iowan   Interstadial."   This  warm   period   lasted 
about  1,500  years,  during  which  the  ice  withdrew  a  certain 
distance. 

b.  Following  the  recession,  a  new  advance  of  the  icecap 
occurred.  This  is  referred  to  as  the  "lowan  Advance."  It 
began  about  21,400  years  ago,  lasted  about  700  years,  and 
was  interrupted  by  a  new  recession  about  20,700  years  ago. 

c.  This  second  recession,  after  less  than  a  thousand  years, 
was  succeeded  by  an  extremely  massive  advance  during  the 
period  from  19,980  to  18,050  years  ago.  These  dates  must 
not  be  taken  as  absolutely  exact;  there  is  always  a  small  mar- 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  2O1 

gin  of  error.  This  new  expansion,  called  the  "Tazewell  Ad- 
vance/' apparently  carried  the  Wisconsin  icecap  to  its  maxi- 
mum extension  and  greatest  volume. 

d.  The  Tazewell  Advance  was  interrupted  by  a  prolonged 
period  of  warmth  and  recession  called  the  "Brady  Interval" 
or  "Brady  Interstadial."  This  lasted  between  three  and  four 
thousand  years.  It  began  before  16,720  years  ago,  and  ended 
sometime  after  14,042  years  ago.  The  ice  retreated  a  long 
way. 

e.  A  fourth  advance  of  the  ice  sheet  beginning  about 
13,600  years  ago,  and  continuing  to  about  12,120  years  ago 
(called  the  "Gary  Advance"),  was  followed  by  the  "Two 
Creeks  Interstadial,"  an  interval  of  warmth  and  recession, 
about  11,404  years  ago. 

f.  A  fifth  advance  of  the  ice,  referred  to  as  the  "Mankato 
Advance,"  appears  to  have  taken  place  between  10,856  and 
8,200  years  ago.  The  high  point  of  this  advance  is  called  the 
"Mankato  Maximum."  Another  writer,  Emiliani,  finds  that 
a  sixth  expansion  of  the  ice  sheet,  the  "Cochrane  Advance," 
took  place  less  than  7,000  years  ago  (132). 

g.  There  was  a  sudden,  virtually  complete  disappearance 
of  the  ice  sheet  (which  had,  however,  according  to  Flint,  been 
getting  thinner  ever  since  the  Tazewell  Advance)  (375:177). 
It  disappeared  in  an  extraordinarily  short  period,  as  shown 
by  a  postglacial  date  from  Cochrane,  Ontario,  6,380  years  ago. 

h.  The  significance  of  the  postglacial  date  from  Ontario 
(close  to  the  center  of  the  former  ice  sheet)  is  increased  when 
we  compare  it  with  the  date  of  the  postglacial  Climatic  Op 
timum,  which  Flint  finds  to  have  occurred  between  6,000  and 
4,000  years  ago.  The  climate  during  the  Optimum,  according 
to  Brooks  (52:296-97),  averaged  about  5  degrees  warmer 
than  at  present.  There  is  a  very  difficult  problem  here  of  ac- 
counting for  the  velocity  of  these  events.  It  is  obvious  that 
the  cold  glacial  climate  of  North  America  must  have  warmed 
up  to  something  like  the  present  prevailing  temperatures 
before  it  could  warm  up  still  further  to  the  point  reached 
in  the  Optimum.  But  if  so,  could  the  whole  wanning  process 


2O2  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

have  taken  place  in  380  years?  It  seems  probable  that  the 
Cochrane  Advance  was  local  and  minor.  The  Mankato  Max- 
imum, however,  was  not.  The  entire  transformation  of  the 
climate  must  then  have  taken  place  in  about  2,000  years. 
In  this  short  interval  a  continental  icecap  disappeared.  It 
had  been  growing  thinner  for  a  long  time,  to  be  sure—for 
about  10,000  years,  since  the  Tazewell  Advance— but  its  final 
dissolution  was  sudden.  Compared  with  the  usual  geological 
time  concepts,  even  the  period  of  10,000  years  for  the  decline 
of  the  ice  sheet  from  the  end  of  the  Tazewell  Advance  is  in- 
credibly rapid.  Horberg,  as  I  have  mentioned,  has  pointed 
out  that  if  the  radiocarbon  method  is  valid,  the  rate  at  which 
the  ice  must  have  advanced  and  retreated  indicates  that  geo- 
logical processes  (especially  meteorological  processes  like 
rainfall)  must  have  been  greatly  accelerated  during  the  ice 
age.  Now  it  is  easy  to  show  that  these  processes  inevitably 
would  have  been  accelerated  by  a  movement  of  the  crust; 
we  shall  return  to  consider  this  matter  in  detail  below. 

As  a  matter  of  fact,  it  is  not  necessary  to  depend  wholly 
upon  radiocarbon  dating  to  establish  the  extraordinary  ve- 
locity of  the  geological  events  of  the  ice  age.  Professor  Urry's 
method  of  radioelement  dating,  used  to  date  the  cores  ob- 
tained by  Hough  from  Antarctica  and  elsewhere,  shows  pre- 
cisely the  same  thing:  the  datings  obtained  by  this  method 
indicate  several  rapid  glaciations  and  deglaciations  of  Ant- 
arctica, and  correlated  world-wide  changes  of  climate.  We 
will  consider  these  again  in  Chapter  IX. 

A  third  line  of  evidence  tending  to  the  same  effect  is  pre- 
sented by  Emiliani,  who  has  applied  a  technique  of  deter- 
mining ancient  temperatures  of  sea  water  that  was  developed 
by  Harold  C.  Urey.  Urey's  method  is  based  on  an  isotope 
of  oxygen.  Emiliani  has  noted  many  important  temperature 
changes  in  a  comparatively  short  period  during  the  latter 
part  of  the  Pleistocene;  he  has  reached  the  conclusion  that 
the  four  known  Pleistocene  glaciations  all  occurred  in  the 
last  300,000  years.  He  agrees  essentially  with  Horberg  as  to 
the  date  of  the  beginning  of  the  Wisconsin  glaciation  (132). 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  2OJ 

Assuming  the  radiocarbon  dates  to  be  correct,  then,  we 
find  that  at  the  end  of  the  Tazewell  Advance  there  was  a 
recession,  and  that  despite  the  readvances  the  ice  gradually 
thinned  until  the  ice  sheet  disappeared.  This  can  be  ac- 
counted for  by  the  assumption  that  the  crust  was  in  motion, 
and  that  it  continued  to  move  slowly  during  all  or  most  of 
the  10,000  years  during  which  the  icecap  was  in  intermittent 
decline.  As  I  have  already  pointed  out,  there  is  no  other 
reasonable  explanation  for  the  disappearance  of  the  ice  sheet. 
But  the  assumption  is  strengthened  by  a  most  remarkable 
fact.  It  would  have  to  be  considered  probable,  as  following 
naturally  from  the  theory,  that  as  the  crust  moved  there 
would  be  a  period,  possibly  prolonged,  when  the  melting  on 
the  equatorward  side  of  the  icecap  would  be  balanced  and 
even  more  than  balanced  by  further  build-up  of  the  icecap 
on  the  poleward  side.  Thus,  as  the  Wisconsin  icecap  moved 
southward,  build-up  of  the  ice  would  continue  on  its  north- 
ern side.  The  result  would  be  that  the  ice  center,  the  center 
of  maximum  thickness,  from  which  the  ice  sheet  would  move 
out  by  gravity  in  all  directions,  would  be 'displaced  to  the 
north.  And  this  is  exactly  what  happened.  Coleman  writes: 

Two  important  facts  have  been  established  by  Low,  who  worked 
over  the  central  parts  of  the  Labrador  sheet:  first,  that  the  center  of 
the  glaciation  shifted  its  position,  at  one  time  being  in  Lat.  51  or 
52,  later  in  Lat.  54,  and  finally  in  Lat.  55  or  56.  Instead  of  beginning 
in  the  north  and  growing  southward  it  reversed  this  direction; 
second,  that  the  central  area  shows  few  signs  of  glaciation,  so  that 
the  pre-glacial  debris  due  to  ages  of  weathering  are  almost  undis- 
turbed. A  broad  circle  around  it  is  scoured  clean  to  the  solid 
rock.  .  .  .  (87:117). 

There  really  could  be  no  more  eloquent  confirmation  of 
the  southward  displacement  of  the  earth's  crust.  We  see  veri- 
fication here  of  one  of  the  important  mechanisms  of  displace- 
ment as  suggested  by  Campbell,  which  is  that  the  continuing 
build-up  of  the  ice  sheet  on  its  poleward  side  as  it  moves 
away  from  the  pole  will  be  a  factor  in  prolonging  the  move- 
ment. This  may,  indeed,  result  in  the  prolongation  of  the 


204  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

movement  until  the  arrival  of  an  oceanic  area  (in  this  case, 
the  Arctic  Ocean)  at  the  pole.  As  to  the  second  fact  that,  ac- 
cording to  Coleman,  was  established  by  Low,  I  shall  suggest 
an  explanation  later  (Chapter  VIII). 


).  The  Cause  of  the  Oscillations  of  the  Ice  Sheet  and 
the  Cause  of  the  Climatic  Optimum 

But  what  about  the  alternating  phases  of  retreat  and  read- 
vance  of  the  ice  sheet?  The  retreats  can  be  explained,  of 
course,  by  the  assumption  that  the  icecap  was  moving  slowly 
into  lower  latitudes  with  the  displacement  of  the  crust.  But 
how  are  the  readvances  to  be  explained?  Up  to  the  present 
there  has  been  no  explanation  for  these. 

I  have  already  suggested  that  a  corollary  of  any  crust  dis- 
placement is  an  increase  of  volcanic  activity.  There  have 
been  times  in  the  past,  however,  when  the  quantity  of  vol- 
canic action  has  been  extraordinary  (231:629).  As  an  exam- 
ple of  this,  there  appears  to  be  evidence  that  in  a  small  area 
of  only  300  square  miles  in  Scandinavia  during  Tertiary 
times  there  may  have  been  as  many  as  70  active  volcanoes  at 
about  the  same  time.  Bergquist,  who  cites  the  evidence,  re- 
marks, "Volcanic  activity  on  this  scale,  erupting  through 
about  70  channels,  and  concentrated  in  a  relatively  short 
period,  must  have  been  very  impressive"  (31:194). 

It  seems  likely  that  a  phase  of  intense  volcanism  would  be 
favored  where  a  sector  of  the  crust  was  moving  toward  the 
equator,  and  undergoing  stretching  (or  "extension")  together 
with  widespread  fracturing,  for  we  must  remember  that  this 
pulling  apart  of  the  crust  would  permit  the  release  of  many 
pre-existent  strains,  the  upward  or  downward  adjustment  of 
blocks  that  had  been  held  out  of  isostatic  adjustment  for  a 
longer  or  shorter  time.  There  would  certainly  be  a  general 
rise  of  igneous  matter  into  millions  of  new  fractures,  and 
occasionally  this  could  result  in  overflows  at  the  surface,  in- 
cluding, as  has  already  been  pointed  out,  vast  lava  floods. 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  205 

A  special  phase  of  the  volcanism  must  now  attract  our  at- 
tention. Most  volcanoes  produce  dust,  sometimes  in  vast 
quantities  (87:271).  This  dust  is  rapidly  distributed  through 
the  atmosphere.  The  effects  of  volcanic  dust  on  the  climate 
have  been  the  subject  of  intensive  studies  (231,  375).  We  must 
stop  for  a  moment  to  summarize  the  essential  results  of  these 
studies. 

The  fundamental  work  on  the  relationship  of  volcanic 
dust  to  climate  is  The  Physics  of  the  Air,  by  Humphreys, 
which  has  been  cited  in  earlier  chapters.  Humphreys  shows 
that  volcanic  dust  can  have  a  remarkable  effect  in  lowering 
temperature.  He  points  out  that  the  effect  of  the  particles 
depends  upon  whether  they  happen  to  be  more  efficient  in 
intercepting  the  sun's  light  and  reflecting  it  back  into  space 
than  they  are  in  preventing  the  radiation  of  the  earth's  heat 
into  outer  space.  What  is  important  is  the  size  and  shape  of 
the  dust  particles  as  compared  with  the  wave  lengths  of  the 
radiation.  Particles  of  a  given  length  will  have  great  re- 
flecting and  scattering  power  on  sunlight,  and  none  on  the 
radiation  of  heat  from  the  earth  (which,  of  course,  is  not 
in  the  form  of  light).  Humphreys  concludes  that  it  is  neces- 
sary to  determine  the  approximate  average  size  of  the  indi- 
vidual grains  of  floating  volcanic  dust,  as  well  as  the  wave 
lengths  of  the  radiation  involved.  He  accomplishes  this  satis- 
factorily. After  mathematical  treatment  of  the  various  factors 
he  concludes:  ".  .  .  the  shell  of  volcanic  dust,  the  particles 
all  being  of  the  size  given,  is  some  thirty  fold  more  effective 
in  shutting  out  solar  radiation  than  it  is  in  keeping  terrestrial 
radiation  in.  .  .  ."  (231:580).  He  also  points  out: 

.  .  .  The  total  quantity  of  dust  sufficient  ...  to  cut  down  the 
intensity  of  solar  radiation  by  20%  ...  is  astonishingly  small— only 
i74th  part  of  a  cubic  kilometer,  or  the  727th  part  of  a  cubic  mile.  .  .  . 
(231:583). 

This,  of  course,  means  that  the  sun's  radiation  is  reduced 
to  this  extent  over  the  whole  surface  of  the  earth.  It  re- 
quires only  a  few  days  for  volcanic  dust  projected  into  the 


206  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

upper  atmosphere  to  be  distributed  around  the  world.  Ap- 
parently, the  amount  of  dust  produced  by  the  eruption  of 
Mt.  Katmai  in  Alaska  in  1912  was  sufficient  slightly  to  lower 
the  temperature  of  the  whole  earth's  surface  for  a  period  of 
two  or  three  years  (87:270;  231:569).  For  long-range  effects 
a  continuous  series  of  explosions  would  be  necessary,  because 
volcanic  dust  settles  out  of  the  atmosphere  in  periods  of  the 
order  of  three  years.  Humphreys  presents  a  great  deal  of  evi- 
dence correlating  variations  in  average  annual  global  tem- 
peratures through  the  nineteenth  century,  with  specific  vol- 
canic eruptions.  He  establishes  the  fact  that  the  eruptions 
certainly  had  an  important  influence. 

If  this  is  true  of  our  times,  what  should  we  expect  to  result 
from  the  activation  of  very  great  numbers  of  volcanoes  dur- 
ing a  displacement  of  the  crust?  Not  only  would  the  tempera- 
ture fall,  and  perhaps  very  drastically,  but  continuing  vol- 
canic outbursts  would  keep  it  low.  At  the  same  time,  the 
alternation  of  periods  of  massive  outbursts  with  periods  of 
quiet  would  produce  violent  variations  of  the  climate,  be- 
tween extremes  of  cold  and  warmth. 

Here  we  have  our  explanation  of  the  five  or  six  major 
readvances  of  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet  (there  were,  appar- 
ently, many  more  minor  ones).  In  all  probability,  they  re- 
sulted from  the  long  continuation  of  massive  outbursts  of 
volcanism.  The  readvances  of  the  ice  are  explained  by  vol- 
canism,  and  the  volcanism  is  explained  by  the  displacement 
of  the  crust. 

It  is  not  necessary,  however,  for  us  merely  to  assume  with- 
out evidence  that  there  must  have  been  unusual  volcanic 
activity  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age.  On  the  contrary,  there  is  a 
rather  remarkable  amount  of  evidence  of  excessive  volcanism 
during  the  decline  of  the  Wisconsin  icecap.  It  comes  from 
many  parts  of  the  earth.  For  North  America  it  is  particularly 
rich.  From  radiocarbon  dating  we  have  learned  that  during 
the  last  part  of  the  ice  age  there  were  active  volcanoes  in  our 
northwestern  states.  One  of  the  greatest  eruptions  was  that 
of  Mt.  Newberry  in  southern  Oregon  less  than  9,000  years 


NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE 

ago  (242:23).  Other  late  glacial  or  early  postglacial  volcanic 
activity  in  Oregon  was  reported  by*  Hansen  (199).  Farther 
south  the  story  is  the  same: 

In  Arizona,  New  Mexico  and  southern  California  there  are  very 
fresh  looking  volcanic  formations.  The  lava  flow  in  the  valley  of  the 
San  Jose  River  in  New  Mexico  is  so  fresh  that  it  lends  support  to 
Indian  traditions  of  a  "river  of  fire"  in  this  locality  (235:113). 

Volcanic  disturbances  in  South  America  about  9,000  years 
ago  have  been  dated  by  radiocarbon  (242:45).  Huntington 
reported  "lava  flows  of  the  glacial  period  interstratified  with 
piedmont  gravel"  in  Central  Asia  (232:168).  Ebba  Hult  de 
Geer  quoted  Franz  Firbaz  as  follows:  "The  volcanic  erup- 
tions that  produced  the  Laacher  marine  volcanic  ash  are 
about  11,000  years  old,  or  a  little  older.  .  .  ."  (108:515). 
Hibben  suggested  that  the  extinctions  of  animals  in  Alaska 
at  the  end  of  the  ice  age  may  have  been  due  to  terrific  vol- 
canic eruptions  there,  of  which  the  evidence  is  plentiful 
(218).  We  will  return  to  his  account  later. 

Volcanic  dust  is  not  the  only  important  product  of  volcanic 
eruptions.  They  also  produce  vast  quantities  of  carbon  diox- 
ide gas.  Tazieff,  for  example,  estimated  that  in  one  eruption 
he  observed  in  Africa,  along  with  about  seventy-eight  mil- 
lion tons  of  lava,  the  volcano  emitted  twenty  billion  cubic 
yards  of  gas  (416:217),  not  all  of  which,  of  course,  was  carbon 
dioxide. 

The  carbon  dioxide  emitted  by  volcanoes  has  an  important 
effect  on  global  temperature,  but  one  quite  different  from 
the  effect  of  the  volcanic  dust.  Being  a  translucent  gas,  it  does 
not  interfere  with  the  entrance  of  sunlight,  of  radiant  heat, 
into  the  atmosphere.  But  it  is  opaque  to  the  radiation  of 
the  earth's  heat  into  outer  space.  A  small  quantity  of  the 
gas  will  act  effectively  to  prevent  loss  of  heat  from  the  earth's 
surface.  A  considerable  increase  in  this  small  percentage  will 
tend  to  raise  the  average  temperatures  of  the  earth's  surface. 

Carbon  dioxide  differs  from  volcanic  dust  also  in  the  fact 
that  because  it  is  a  gas  it  will  not  settle  out  of  the  atmosphere. 


2o8  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

It  will  remain  until,  in  the  course  of  time,  it  is  absorbed 
by  the  vegetation,  or  by  chemical  processes  in  the  rock  sur- 
faces exposed  to  the  weather.  Therefore,  as  compared  with 
volcanic  dust,  carbon  dioxide  is  a  long-range  factor,  and  its 
effect  is  opposite  to  that  of  the  dust. 

In  any  displacement  of  the  crust  it  follows  that  massive 
outbursts  of  volcanism  must  have  added  to  the  supply  of 
carbon  dioxide  in  the  air.  Its  proportion  in  the  atmosphere 
must  have  finally  been  raised  far  above  normal.  In  conse- 
quence, it  is  likely  that  whenever  volcanic  activity  declined 
sufficiently  to  permit  a  warming  of  the  climate,  the  high 
proportion  of  carbon  dioxide  in  the  air  may  have  acted  to 
intensify  the  upward  swing  of  the  temperature.  This  would 
have  increased  the  violence  of  the  oscillations  of  the  climate, 
and  would  have  accelerated  many  geological  processes. 

Evidence  that  the  proportion  of  carbon  dioxide  in  the  air 
was,  in  fact,  higher  toward  the  end  of  the  ice  age  than  it  is 
now  is  provided  by  recent  studies  of  gases  contained  in  ice- 
bergs. Scholander  and  Kanwisher,  writing  in  Science,  re- 
ported that  air  frozen  into  these  bergs,  presumably  dating 
from  the  ice  age,  showed  lower  oxygen  content  than  air  has 
at  the  present  time,  and  theorized: 

Possibly  this  ice  was  formed  as  far  back  as  Pleistocene  time,  when 
cold  climates  may  have  curbed  the  photosynthetic  activity  of  green 
plants  over  large  parts  of  the  earth,  resulting  in  a  slight  lowering 
of  the  oxygen  content  of  the  air  (368:104-05). 

The  weight  of  a  great  deal  of  evidence  presented  in  this 
book  is  opposed  to  this  particular  speculation;  we  must  sup- 
pose, on  the  contrary,  that  the  earth's  surface  as  a  whole  was 
then  no  colder  than  it  is  now,  and  that  just  as  many  plants 
were  absorbing  carbon  dioxide  and  releasing  oxygen  into 
the  air  then  as  now.  But  the  same  fact— the  lower  proportion 
of  oxygen— may  perhaps  be  explained  by  supposing  a  higher 
proportion  of  carbon  dioxide,  especially  if  we  assume  a  mas- 
sive increase  in  the  proportion  of  that  gas  in  the  air. 

Another  consideration  that  greatly  strengthens  this  line  of 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  2OQ 

thinking  about  the  carbon  dioxide  is  that  the  assumption  of 
a  cumulative  increase  in  the  proportion  of  the  gas  in  the  air, 
during  the  movement  of  the  crust  and  the  waning  of  the  ice 
sheet,  helps  to  explain  not  only  the  extraordinarily  rapid 
final  melting  of  the  ice  but  also  the  succeeding  Climatic 
Optimum. 

The  Climatic  Optimum  is  the  most  important  climatic 
episode  since  the  end  of  the  ice  age;  the  fact  of  the  occur- 
rence is  well  attested,  but  it  is  unexplained.  Scientists  have 
been  aware  that  this  2,ooo-year  warming  of  the  climate  could 
have  resulted  from  an  increase  in  the  carbon  dioxide  con- 
tent of  the  air,  but  this  has  not  been  helpful,  since  hitherto 
no  way  has  been  found  by  which  to  account  for  an  increase 
of  the  required  magnitude.  No  other  possible  cause  of  the 
warm  phase  (such  as  an  increase  in  the  quantity  of  the  sun's 
radiant  heat)  has  been  supported  by  tangible  evidence.  It 
seems  that  the  assumption  of  a  displacement  of  the  crust 
furnishes  the  first  possibility  of  a  solution. 

To  return,  for  a  moment,  to  the  question  of  the  several 
readvances  of  the  ice,  it  may  be  asked,  Why  did  the  volcanism 
occur  in  massive  outbursts  separated  by  quieter  periods? 
Why  was  it  not  continuous  through  the  whole  movement  of 
the  crust?  Campbell  has  suggested  an  answer.  It  is  quite 
possible  that  the  fracturing  of  the  crust,  necessary  to  permit 
the  displacement,  was  itself  spasmodic.  We  may  assume  that 
when  the  mounting  bursting  stress  brought  to  bear  on  the 
crust  by  the  growth  of  the  icecap  finally  reached  the  critical 
point  (that  is,  the  limit  of  the  crust's  strength),  considerable 
fracturing  occurred  in  a  rather  short  time,  accompanied  by 
massive  volcanism.  The  crust  would  now  start  to  move,  and 
it  would  continue  to  move  easily  to  the  distance  permitted 
by  the  extent  of  the  fractures  so  far  created.  The  movement 
might  then  come  to  a  halt,  and  the  accompanying  volcan- 
ism would  tend  then  to  subside.  Meanwhile,  on  the  pole- 
ward side  of  the  icecap  the  ice  still  would  be  building  up, 
and  the  bursting  stress  resulting  from  it  would  again  be  on 
the  increase.  New  fracturing  would  eventually  occur,  with 


210  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

a  new  outburst  of  volcanism,  and  the  movement  would  be 
renewed.  In  the  intervals  between  phases  of  intense  vol- 
canism the  dust  would  settle  out  of  the  air,  the  carbon  diox- 
ide would  take  effect,  and  the  climate  would  rapidly  grow 
warmer.  This  warm  "interstadial,"  however,  would  affect 
different  sides  of  the  icecap  differently;  it  could  cause  im- 
portant recessions  of  the  ice  sheet  on  the  equatorward  side, 
and  at  the  same  time,  because  of  the  accompanying  rise  in 
humidity,  it  could  augment  the  snowfall  on  the  poleward 
side. 

The  crust  would  continue  to  move,  even  though  with  each 
recurring  warm  period  the  ice  sheet  grew  thinner,  because 
the  icecap,  at  each  successive  stage,  would  have  been  moved 
farther  from  the  axis  of  rotation,  so  that  the  effects  of  the 
diminishing  quantity  of  the  ice  would  be  effectively  coun- 
terbalanced by  the  multiplication  of  the  centrifugal  effect 
per  unit  volume  of  the  remaining  ice  (see  Chapter  XI). 

Finally  a  time  would  come  when  the  rising  temperatures 
of  the  lower  latitudes  and  the  accumulation  of  carbon  di- 
oxide would  so  far  exceed  the  refrigerating  effects  of  vol- 
canic outbursts  that  the  latter  would  become  impotent  to 
maintain  the  icecap.  With  the  reduction  of  the  icecap  below 
a  certain  point,  the  crust  would  cease  to  move,  volcanic  dis- 
turbance would  decline,  the  air  would  be  cleared  of  dust, 
and  within  a  short  time  the  accumulated  carbon  dioxide 
would  usher  in  the  warm  phase  of  the  Optimum.  The  story 
ends  with  the  absorption  of  the  carbon  dioxide  by  the  vege- 
tation, the  reduction  of  its  percentage  to  normal,  and  the 
establishment  of  a  climate  like  the  present. 


4.  The  Glaciation  of  Europe 

Further  confirmation  of  the  position  of  North  America  at 
the  pole  during  the  Wisconsin  glaciation  comes  from  Eu- 
rope. Radiocarbon  dating  has  revealed  some  very  interesting 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  211 

facts  about  the  relationship  of  the  American  and  Scandi- 
navian glaciers. 

It  has  been  shown,  by  Flint  (375:175)  and  others,  that 
there  is  a  correspondence  in  the  timing  of  the  phases  of 
advance  and  retreat  of  the  ice  on  both  sides  of  the  Atlantic. 
This  is  exactly  what  we  should  expect,  considering  that  the 
causes  of  the  oscillations,  the  volcanic  dust  and  the  carbon 
dioxide,  were  world-wide  in  their  effects. 

But  despite  this  synchronism,  there  is  also  an  important 
difference  between  the  two  glaciations:  it  is  clear  that  the 
icecap  in  Europe  underwent  proportionately  greater  diminu- 
tion with  each  phase  of  the  recession  after  the  Tazewell 
Maximum.  The  assumption  that  the  glaciations  on  both 
sides  of  the  Atlantic  were  in  all  respects  precisely  contempo- 
rary, that  they  advanced  and  retreated  equally  at  equal  times, 
has  now  produced  contradictions  of  a  very  glaring  character. 
It  has  placed  two  specialists,  Ernst  Antevs  and  Ebba  Hult  de 
Geer,  at  odds  with  each  other. 

The  basis  of  the  contradiction  is  as  follows:  The  late  hus- 
band of  Ebba  Hult  de  Geer,  Gerard  de  Geer,  was  the  author 
of  the  so-called  "Swedish  Time  Scale."  This  is  a  method  of 
geological  dating  based  on  countings  and  comparisons  of  an- 
nually deposited  layers  of  clay  (varves)  in  lakes.  De  Geer  first 
developed  the  method  more  than  a  generation  ago.  In  a 
number  of  instances  datings  established  by  it  have  been  well 
confirmed  by  the  more  recent  radiocarbon  method. 

De  Geer  found  that  by  about  13,000  years  ago  the  Scandi- 
navian icecap  had  retired  from  Germany  and  England,  and 
that  the  ice  front  lay  across  Sweden.  It  is  obvious  that  its 
withdrawal  from  Germany  and  England  must  have  started 
thousands  of  years  earlier.  By  13,000  years  ago  a  large  per- 
centage of  the  whole  European  icecap  was  gone.  In  America, 
however,  the  reduction  of  the  Wisconsin  icecap  had  pro- 
ceeded nowhere  near  so  far.  Twice  again,  after  this,  the 
American  icecap  expanded  in  the  Gary  and  Mankato  Ad- 
vances. The  great  icecap,  though  thinner,  still  occupied  most 
of  its  original  area. 


212  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

Now,  what  Dr.  Antevs  says  is  that  the  radiocarbon  dates 
from  America  don't  make  sense,  and  the  radiocarbon  method 
must  be  wrong  (9:516).  He  attacks  the  method  because  the 
rates  of  withdrawal  of  the  ice  which  it  suggests  are  to  him 
fantastic.  He  complains  particularly  about  the  disproportion 
in  the  indicated  speeds  of  withdrawal  in  America  and  Eu- 
rope. The  radiocarbon  method  has  indicated  that  the  Man- 
kato  Maximum  occurred  between  11,000  and  10,000  years 
ago.  This  stage  has  been  related  chronologically  to  the  so- 
called  Salpausselka  Stage  in  Europe.  Antevs  considers  this 
totally  unreasonable,  because 

This  correlation  equates  a  point  at  less  than  one-quarter  of  the 
American  ice-sheet  radius  with  one  at  the  half  way  mark  in  Europe. 
Clearly  this  lop-sided  matching  cannot  be  right. 

He  says,  further: 

Other  implications  are  equally  unreasonable.  .  .  .  The  Canadian 
ice  sheet  would  still  have  touched  Lake  Superior  when  the  Scandina- 
vian ice  sheet  had  entirely  disappeared.  .  .  . 

Antevs  makes  the  conflict  more  explicit,  as  follows: 

The  North  American  ice  sheet  would  still  have  extended  to  the 
middle  of  the  Great  Lakes  when  the  Scandinavian  ice  sheet  had  en- 
tirely disappeared,  for  the  latter  had  melted  from  the  Angermanalven 
basis  by  8550  B.P.  [Before  the  Present],  and  from  Lapland  by  7800 
B.P.,  and  what  is  more,  the  ice  would  still  have  lingered  in  these  lakes 
while  the  distinctly  warmer  Altithermal  [Climatic  Optimum]  came 
and  went.  The  ice  retreat  would  have  been  exceedingly  slow  during 
the  Altithermal  but  extraordinarily  rapid  during  the  last  3500  years, 
which  have  been  only  moderately  warm  (9:519). 

Antevs  is  therefore  driven  into  a  blank  rejection  of  radio- 
carbon dating.  He  insists,  in  contradiction  to  all  such  datings, 
that  the  icecap  must  have  left  the  Canadian  Mattawa  Valley 
about  13,700  years  ago,  and  that  the  Mankato  Maximum 
(which  he  refers  to  as  the  Valders  Maximum)  must  have  oc- 
curred about  19,000  years  ago  (9:520).  In  the  discussion  in 
the  pages  of  the  Journal  of  Geology,  between  him  and  Mrs. 
de  Geer,  Mrs.  de  Geer  insists  on  the  high  reliability  of  the 


NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE 

radiocarbon  method  and  on  the  general  agreement  of  the 
radiocarbon  dates  with  the  dates  found  by  the  Swedish  Time 
Scale.  With  regard  to  the  date  of  the  Mankato  Advance  chal- 
lenged by  Antevs,  she  says: 

The  whole  method  of  C14  determinations,  however,  is  taken  up 
by  America's  most  clever  research  men  and  practiced  very  critically 
—most  of  all  the  special  test  at  Two  Creeks.  As  they  were  startled 
by  the  low  figures  of  years  obtained,  they  repeated  the  investigation 
several  times.  As  the  same  value  always  recurred,  such  critical  persons 
might  well  have  examined  eventual  deficiencies  of  the  material 
before  publishing  a  result  regarded  generally  as  unbelievable.  Since 
such  a  procedure  was  not  found  necessary,  the  test  is  probably  reliable, 
although  many  others  may  be  doubtful  (108:514). 

However,  Antevs  succeeds  in  making  it  plain  that  some  of 
the  late  Dr.  de  Geer's  dates,  as  found  by  the  method  of  count- 
ing clay  varves,  are  inconsistent  with  radiocarbon  dates. 

Now  here  is  a  shocking  conflict  between  experts,  each  with 
years  of  experience  in  the  field  and  direct  access  to  all  the 
relevant  data.  How  can  it  be  resolved?  It  seems  very  likely 
that  the  evidence  stressed  by  both  is  largely,  though  not  en- 
tirely, sound.  Yet  the  difference  between  them  is  a  major 
difference. 

This  contradiction  may  be  resolved  by  the  simple  assump- 
tion that  North  America  lay  at  the  pole  during  the  Wiscon- 
sin period.  By  this  assumption,  Europe  would  have  been  a 
long  way  south  of  the  Hudson  Bay  region.  As  I  pointed  out 
earlier,  the  thinner  European  ice,  and  the  fact  that  it  did  not 
reach  so  far  south  as  ice  did  in  America,  can  be  accounted 
for  in  this  way.  The  more  rapid  retreat  of  the  European 
glacier  is  entirely  understandable  on  the  assumption  that  it 
occupied  a  lower  latitude.  The  simultaneous  phases  of  re- 
treat and  advance,  then,  and  the  faster  general  retreat  of  the 
European  glacier  are  both  understandable. 

This  problem  of  the  relationship  of  the  American  and 
European  glaciations  raises  another  question.  Why  was  it 
that,  with  a  pole  in  Hudson  Bay  or  western  Quebec,  Great 
Britain  and  Scandinavia  were  glaciated  at  all,  since  Scan3i- 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

navia  at  least  must  then  have  lain  somewhat  farther  from 
the  pole  than  it  does  now?  Furthermore,  why  did  Alaska 
then  have  many  great  mountain  glaciers,  but  no  continuous 
ice  sheet?  The  latter  problem  is  intensified  by  the  considera- 
tion that  the  particular  movement  of  the  crust  that  we  are 
supposing  here,  while  it  lowered  the  latitude  of  eastern  North 
America  a  great  deal,  must  have  slightly  raised  the  latitude 
of  Alaska,  especially  that  of  northern  Alaska.  The  reader 
can  make  these  relationships  clear  to  himself  by  referring 
now  to  a  globe.  We  are  assuming  the  displacement  to  have 
occurred  along  the  goth  meridian. 

The  explanation  of  the  glaciation  of  northwestern  Europe 
is,  I  think,  as  follows.  First,  the  heaviest  glaciation  of  Europe 
is  not  contemporary  with  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet,  but  was 
the  consequence  of  an  earlier  polar  position,  which  will  be 
discussed  further  on  (Chapter  IX).  Secondly,  the  compara- 
tively thin  European  ice  sheet  of  Wisconsin  time  (which  in 
Britain  consisted  really  only  of  discontinuous  mountain  gla- 
ciers) was  made  possible  by  a  very  special  combination  of 
meteorological  conditions.  In  North  America  a  vast  icecap 
extended  eastward  from  its  center  near  Hudson  Bay.  Much 
of  the  continental  shelf  in  this  whole  area  was  then  above 
sea  level,  as,  indeed,  it  should  have  been  to  agree  with  our 
general  theory,  and  this  was  covered  by  ice.  Then  the  anti- 
cyclonic  winds,  blowing  outward  in  all  directions  from  the 
icecap,  had  only  to  cross  the  narrow  North  Atlantic,  raising 
moisture  from  the  sea  and  depositing  it  upon  Scandinavia 
and  Britain. 

At  first  glance  it  might  seem  that  a  pole  in  Hudson  Bay 
would  have  involved  a  heavy  glaciation  of  Greenland,  but 
there  are  reasons  to  suppose  that  it  might,  on  the  contrary, 
involve  a  deglaciation.  Depending  on  the  precise  location  of 
the  pole,  parts  of  Greenland  would  have  lain  farther  from 
it  than  they  do  from  the  present  North  Pole.  Of  greater  im- 
portance, however,  is  the  fact  that  the  Arctic  Ocean  would 
have  been  a  temperate,  and  even,  on  the  Siberian  side,  a  warm 
temperate,  sea.  It  would  be  likely,  in  these  circumstances, 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  215 

that  a  warm  current  like  the  Gulf  Stream  would  have  been 
flowing  at  that  time  out  of  the  Arctic  and  down  the  coast  of 
Greenland.  Such  a  warm  current  might  easily  have  degla- 
ciated  the  island  (or  rather,  islands).  It  might,  however,  have 
been  deflected  from  Scandinavia  and  the  British  Isles  by  land 
masses  in  the  North  Atlantic,  to  be  discussed  later  on. 

If  this  deglaciation,  indeed,  reflects  what  really  happened 
in  Greenland,  then  there  must  have  been  a  warm  interval  in 
Europe  between  the  period  of  massive  glaciation,  to  be  dis- 
cussed later,  and  the  much  less  severe  glaciation  of  late  Wis- 
consin time.  The  present  glaciation  of  Greenland  would  have 
been  the  consequence  of  the  passage  of  the  pole  from  the 
Hudson  Bay  region  to  its  present  location,  with  the  refrig- 
eration of  the  Arctic  Ocean.  The  final  warming  of  the  cli- 
mate both  in  Europe  and  in  America  would  have  been  the 
consequence  of  the  disappearance  of  the  North  American 
icecap,  and  of  the  pattern  of  anticyclonic  winds  which  it  had 
created. 

So  far  as  the  glaciation  of  Alaska  is  concerned,  again,  the 
climate  there  was  colder  than  it  is  now  because  of  the  vast 
refrigerating  effect  of  the  icecap  that  covered  4,000,000 
square  miles  of  the  continent.  Just  as,  at  present,  the  Antarc- 
tic icecap  makes  the  South  Polar  region  colder  than  the  Arc- 
tic (because  it  is  a  perfect  reflector  of  the  sun's  radiant  energy 
back  into  space),  so  then  the  great  Wisconsin  icecap  meant 
that  the  prevailing  temperatures  at  the  center  of  the  ice 
sheet  (presumably  the  pole)  were  much  lower  than  the  tem- 
peratures prevailing  now  at  the  present  North  Pole,  where 
no  great  icecap  exists.  But,  although  the  intensely  cold  anti- 
cyclonic  winds  blowing  off  the  Wisconsin  icecap  made  Alaska 
colder  than  it  is  now,  and  thereby  produced  larger  glaciers 
than  exist  at  present,  still  these  winds  blew  only  over  con- 
tinuous land,  and  not  over  the  sea,  and  so  they  could  not 
pick  up  the  moisture  required  to  produce  a  continuous  ice 
sheet.  This  explains  why  Alaska  warmed  up  at  the  end  of 
the  North  American  ice  age,  even  though  it  actually  may 
have  moved  closer  to  the  pole. 


2i6  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

Another  interesting  argument  is  used  by  Antevs  to  buttress 
his  position  against  radiocarbon  dating.  It  is  based  on  the 
evidence  of  crustal  warping  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age.  Radio- 
carbon dating  would,  he  says,  require  a  fantastic  rate  of 
crustal  warping,  considered  impossible  by  geophysicists.  He 
says: 

My  dating  of  the  Cochrane  stage  at  11300-10150  B.P.  is  directly 
supported  by  the  fact  that  long  ages  were  required  for  the  crustal 
rise  which  has  occurred  in  the  region  since  its  release  from  the  ice, 
At  the  south  end  of  James  Bay  the  rise  of  land  relative  to  sea-level 
amounts  to  600—700  feet.  .  .  .  The  upward  movement  of  some  650 
feet  equals  the  rise  of  the  Scandinavian  center  of  uplift  during  the 
last  8,200  years.  Since  the  rates  of  modern  uplifts  are  similar,  01 
one  meter  a  century  in  the  Scandinavian  center,  and  probably  70-80 
centimeters  (2.3-2.6  feet)  a  century  at  James  Bay,  the  past  rates  ma} 
also  have  been  similar.  Since,  furthermore,  the  uplifts  in  the  two 
regions  may  have  been  essentially  equal  in  general,  the  regression  of 
the  shore  line  in  the  James  Bay  region  by  some  650  vertical  feet 
must  have  taken  several  thousand  years,  perhaps  8,000-10,000 
years.  .  .  .  (108:520). 

However,  a  displacement  of  the  crust,  with  America  moved 
farther  than  Europe,  would  solve  this  problem.  Processes  of 
adjustment  of  the  crust  would  have  a  velocity  proportional 
to  the  amount  of  the  displacement  of  the  particular  area.  B) 
assumption,  North  America  was  displaced  more  than  2,ooc 
miles  to  the  south,  but  the  southward  displacement  of  the 
glaciated  area  in  Europe  amounted  to  only  about  500  miles, 
The  assumption  of  crust  displacement  offers  the  first  possi- 
bility of  reconciling  the  observed  rates  of  crustal  warping  in 
America  with  geophysical  principles. 


5.  Changes  in  Sea  Level  at  the  End  of  the  Ice  Age 

There  was  a  remarkable  number  of  changes  in  the  elevation 
of  lands,  and  their  interconnections,  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age 
The  idea  that  they  can  all  be  explained  either  by  a  general 
rise  of  sea  level  due  to  the  melting  of  ice  or  by  the  isostatic 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  217 

rebound  of  the  areas  after  the  ice  left  is,  however,  fallacious. 
Let  us  consider,  first,  the  question  as  to  how  far  the  melting 
of  ice,  raising  the  sea  level,  can  solve  the  problem. 

The  new  radioelement  data  from  Antarctica,  as  we  have 
seen,  strongly  suggest  that  the  huge  total  quantity  of  ice 
supposed  to  have  existed  during  the  ice  age  is  an  illusion.  It 
now  appears  that  while  the  glaciers  were  at  their  maximum 
in  North  America  a  large  part  of  Antarctica  was  ice-free. 
This  is  the  only  reasonable  interpretation  of  the  Antarctic 
data.  It  is  therefore  doubtful  that  the  amount  of  ice  then  was 
very  different  in  amount  from  that  existing  now.  We  have 
noted  that  for  about  10,000  years  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet  was 
growing  thinner,  until  its  final  disappearance.  If  this  was  the 
result  of  the  southward  movement  of  the  icecap— if  North 
America  was  then  moving  southward— Antarctica  must,  at 
the  same  time,  have  been  moving  into  the  Antarctic  Circle. 
Therefore,  as  the  ice  sheet  gradually  thinned  in  North  Amer- 
ica, as  it  withdrew  in  Europe,  the  Antarctic  icecap  must  have 
been  in  process  of  expansion.  The  water  released  by  the  melt- 
ing in  North  America  may  have  been  mostly  locked  up  again 
in  the  gathering  Antarctic  snows. 

It  follows  from  this  that  the  process,  during  a  period  of 
perhaps  10,000  years,  was  simply  one  of  transfer  of  ice  masses 
from  the  Northern  Hemisphere  to  Antarctica.  It  is  difficult 
to  say  whether  the  tempos  of  melting  in  North  America  and 
of  accumulation  in  Antarctica  were  always  closely  in  line, 
or  which  may  have  been  faster.  No  doubt  alternations  took 
place.  In  consequence,  there  may  have  been  minor  fluctua- 
tions of  sea  level,  without  a  major  universal  rise. 

Yet  such  a  rise  of  the  sea  level  in  some  parts  of  the  world 
did  take  place.  It  has  already  been  pointed  out  that  such 
changes  must  accompany  a  displacement  of  the  crust.  We 
have  merely  to  decide  which  method  of  accounting  for  the 
facts  is  most  reasonable. 

If  the  rise  of  the  sea  was  due  to  melting  ice,  it  should,  ad- 
mittedly, have  been  quantitatively  proportional  to  the  quan- 
tity of  the  ice  that  is  assumed  to  have  melted.  It  should,  of 


2i8  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

course,  have  been  the  same  in  all  parts  of  the  world  (allow- 
ing some  differences,  perhaps,  for  vertical  movements  of  the 
land  locally).  It  should  have  been  universal— that  is,  the  evi- 
dences should  be  observable  everywhere,  on  all  the  conti- 
nents. There  is,  however,  strong  evidence  in  conflict  with 
each  of  these  propositions. 

The  maximum  rise  in  sea  level  that  can  be  ascribed  to  the 
melting  of  the  Pleistocene  ice  sheets  (assuming  that  the  Ant- 
arctic icecap  existed  contemporaneously  with  them)  is  about 
300  feet.  This  is  a  liberal  estimate.  Yet,  in  a  recent  study, 
Fisk  and  McFarlan  show  that  the  sea  level  during  the  Wis- 
consin glaciation  (on  American  coasts)  was  450  feet  below 
the  present  level  (153:294-96).  Moreover,  according  to  them, 
this  is  a  minimum  estimate,  and  the  probabilities  favor  a 
greater  lowering  of  the  sea  level  in  the  late  Pleistocene.  Still 
more  interesting,  they  give  a  chart  showing  that  the  lowest 
sea  level  was  earlier  than  28,000  years  ago,  or  considerably 
before  the  maximum  of  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet.  This  date 
was  established  by  radiocarbon  (153:281).  It  can  only  mean 
that  the  low  sea  level  must  be  attributed  to  a  cause  other 
than  the  withdrawal  of  water  from  the  ocean  to  form  that 
ice  sheet. 

Furthermore,  Fisk  and  McFarlan  show  that  the  sea  was 
rising  20,000  years  ago,  before  the  completion  of  the  massive 
Tazewell  Advance  that  carried  the  Wisconsin  icecap  to  its 
maximum  size  (153:298).  Surely,  if  the  sea  level  were  con- 
trolled by  the  glaciers,  it  should  have  been  falling.  Finally, 
Fisk  and  McFarlan  show  that  the  sea  level  had  risen  to 
within  100  feet  of  its  present  level  by  10,000  years  ago.  Yet 
we  know  that  by  that  time  the  Wisconsin  glaciation  was  a 
mere  shadow  of  its  former  self,  while  the  Scandinavian  had 
virtually  ceased  to  exist.  Is  it  likely  that  the  remnants  of  these 
ice  sheets  could  later  have  raised  the  ocean  level  100  feet? 
The  question  is  rendered  even  more  doubtful  by  a  news 
item  that  comes  to  me  while  I  write  these  lines.  It  is  a  dis- 
patch to  the  New  York  Times  by  John  Hillaby,  dated  from 
Sheffield,  England,  September  2,  1956,  giving  an  account  of 


NORTH  AMERICA  AT  THE  POLE 

the  meeting  of  the  British  Association  for  the  Advancement 
of  Science.  Hillaby  describes  a  paper  by  Professor  Harold 
Godwin  of  Cambridge  University  in  which  the  professor 
gives  the  results  of  extensive  research  into  the  question  of 
the  date  of  the  separation  of  England  from  the  Continent. 
The  date  has  been  found  to  be  5,000  B.C.,  or  7,000  years  ago. 
The  report  shows  that  the  research  work  was  very  thorough. 
Now,  obviously,  by  7,000  years  ago  the  Scandinavian  icecap 
was  long  since  gone,  and  the  North  American  ice  sheet  was 
reduced  to  a  few  Canadian  remnants.  Yet  only  now  did  the 
North  Sea  bottom  sink,  and  the  English  Channel  become 
flooded  by  the  sea.  There  is  evidently  something  wrong  here. 
There  is  a  suggestion  here  that  the  floodings  were  produced 
by  readjustments  of  the  crust,  and  not  by  glacial  melt  water. 

There  is  evidence  that  the  sea  rose  (or  the  land  subsided) 
farther  on  the  western  than  on  the  eastern  side  of  the  At- 
lantic. This,  of  course,  suggests  that  the  development  was 
not  related  to  an  increase  of  melt  water.  A  good  deal  of  this 
evidence  was  presented  years  ago  by  J.  Howard  Wilson,  in 
his  interesting  Glacial  History  of  Nantucket  and  Cape  Cod 
(454).  Wilson  argued  that  eastern  North  America  must  have 
stood  from  1,000  to  2,500  feet  above  its  present  level  during 
the  ice  age.  If  we  take  the  lesser  estimate  and  compare  it  with 
the  findings  of  Fisk  and  McFarlan  (which  they  give  as 
minima  only)  we  can  see  that  they  are  in  pretty  good  agree- 
ment. Coleman  was  in  agreement  with  Wilson,  but  based 
his  opinion  on  the  evidence  of  submarine  canyons,  which,  as 
I  have  already  mentioned,  may  have  been  created  by  fractur- 
ing of  the  crust  rather  than  by  subaerial  erosion  and  subse- 
quent subsidence.  Wright  and  Shaler,  however,  presented 
evidence  for  a  2,ooo-foot  higher  elevation  of  Florida  during 
the  ice  age  (460),  an  elevation  that  would  mean  a  very  differ- 
ent distribution  of  land  in  the  Caribbean  during  the  period. 

In  two  different  ways  this  evidence  agrees  with  our  dis- 
placement theory.  First,  as  the  direction  of  the  movement  of 
the  North  Atlantic  region  would  hypothetically  have  been 
equatorward,  some  subsidence  of  the  ocean  basin  was  log- 


220  EARTH    S     SHIFTING     CRUST 

ically  to  be  expected.  Then,  as  the  western  side  of  the  At- 
lantic was  closer  to  the  meridian  of  maximum  displacement, 
it  would  have  been  displaced  through  more  degrees  of  lati- 
tude, and  in  consequence  there  should  have  been  greater 
subsidence  on  the  American  side  of  the  ocean.  Our  theory 
implies  that  the  Hudson  Bay  region  was  moved  southward 
about  2,000  miles,  while  at  the  same  time  the  southward 
movement  of  France  amounted  to  no  more  than  five  hun- 
dred. The  ratio  of  these  distances  is  about  four  to  one,  and 
this  is  very  close  to  the  estimated  subsidence  on  the  western 
side  of  the  Atlantic,  of  about  1,000  feet,  as  compared  to  that 
on  the  eastern  side,  of  less  than  300. 

From  the  other  side  of  the  globe  comes  equally  impressive 
evidence.  Wallace  argued  for  a  subsidence  of  at  least  600  feet 
of  the  coastlines  of  Southeast  Asia  and  Indonesia  at  the  end  of 
the  Pleistocene.  These  areas  lie  close  to  the  same  meridian 
of  maximum  displacement,  the  goth  meridian,  which  runs 
through  Labrador,  and  accordingly  they  should  have  been 
displaced  the  same  distance  as  eastern  North  America,  and 
the  resulting  subsidence  should  have  been  of  the  same  order. 
The  Philippines  are  thought  to  have  become  separated  from 
Asia  only  some  10,000  years  ago;  the  separation  of  New 
Guinea  from  Australia  and  of  Java  from  Sumatra  may  have 
been  even  more  recent.  Again,  the  subsidence  may  have  con- 
siderably exceeded  600  feet,  which  Wallace  gives  as  a  mini- 
mum (444:24-25).  Needless  to  say,  a  rise  of  the  sea  level  of 
this  extent  cannot  be  explained  as  the  result  of  melting  of 
glaciers. 

I  have  already  mentioned  the  fact  that  some  geophysicists 
seriously  doubt  that  the  rise  of  the  land  around  the  former 
glaciated  tracts  since  the  end  of  the  ice  age  is  due  to  isostatic 
rebound.  It  may  be  more  correctly  accounted  for  as  a  part  of 
the  aftermath  of  the  last  displacement  of  the  crust.  We  have 
seen  that  polar  areas  are,  according  to  the  theory,  areas  re- 
cently moved  poleward.  Accordingly,  they  have  undergone 
compression  and  uplift,  the  major  part  of  the  uplift  being 
due  to  the  lag  in  isostatic  readjustment  of  the  crust  to  the 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  221 

variation  o£  gravity  with  latitude  (Chapter  IV).  An  equator- 
ward  movement  of  such  an  area  would  cause  extra  subsidence 
—more  than  would  occur  with  an  area  in  isostatic  equilib- 
rium at  the  start  of  the  movement.  And  subsequently,  iso- 
static adjustment  would  re-elevate  the  area,  but  not  to  its 
original,  excessive  extent.  This  interpretation  of  the  rebound 
of  the  glaciated  tracts  has  the  advantage  that  it  can  reconcile 
the  facts  there  with  the  point  of  view  expressed  by  Gilluly, 
and  with  the  data  from  other  parts  of  the  world  that  so 
greatly  puzzled  Daly. 

While  there  is  no  evidence  that  the  sea  level  rose  all  over 
the  world  and  to  the  same  extent  everywhere  at  the  end  of 
the  ice  age,  there  is  a  good  deal  of  evidence  that  it  has  fallen 
somewhat  since.  One  specialist  in  this  field,  Anderson,  re- 
ported evidence  of  a  fall  of  sea  level  amounting  to  between 
100  and  140  feet,  and  extending  over  a  vast  area.  He  made  a 
point  of  emphasizing  that  this  could  not  be  explained  by 
the  postglacial  isostatic  rebound  of  the  formerly  glaciated 
tracts  of  North  America  and  Scandinavia.  He  is  thoroughly 
puzzled  by  what  seems  to  him  an  inexplicable  fact: 

.  .  .  what  was  the  cause  of  a  fall  in  sea-level  at  a  time  when  it 
should  have  been  rising  owing  to  the  melting  of  the  ice?  (4:493). 

This  fall  of  sea  level  is  a  matter  of  very  great  interest.  I 
have  already  suggested  that  down  to  the  disappearance  of  the 
glaciers  in  the  Northern  Hemisphere,  the  melt  water  from 
them  may  have  pretty  well  balanced  the  growth  of  ice  in 
Antarctica,  so  that  there  was  no  important  change  of  sea  level. 
With  the  disappearance  of  those  northern  ice  sheets,  how- 
ever, the  situation  changed.  There  was  now  no  longer  a 
supply  of  melt  water  to  balance  the  withdrawal  of  water  to 
be  locked  up  in  the  form  of  snow  in  Antarctica;  consequently 
the  sea  level  had  to  fall.  Even  the  magnitude  of  the  fall  is  in 
agreement,  if  we  suppose  that  by  about  10,000  years  ago, 
when  the  northern  icecaps  dwindled  away,  the  Antarctic 
icecap  was  half  grown.  For  it  is  estimated  that  if  the  whole 
amount  of  ice  now  in  Antarctica  were  suddenly  melted,  it 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

would  suffice  to  raise  the  sea  level  between  200  and  300  feet. 
Half  of  it,  therefore,  would  account  for  the  amount  of  the 
fall  in  sea  level  noted  by  Anderson. 

There  is  a  widespread  impression  that  the  sea  level  is  now 
rising  all  over  the  world,  but  this  impression  seems  to  be  mis- 
taken. It  is  natural,  considering  the  widely  publicized  opin- 
ion that  all  present-day  icecaps  are  in  retreat,  that  people 
should  rush  to  interpret  a  relative  rise  of  the  sea  level  at  a 
few  localities  as  indications  of  a  general  rise,  caused  by  the 
assumed  current  melting  of  ice  in  both  hemispheres.  An 
examination  of  the  data  on  which  this  claim  is  based  shows, 
however,  that  the  evidence  is  quite  insufficient.  I  recently 
made  an  inquiry  of  the  United  States  Coast  and  Geodetic 
Survey  regarding  this  matter  and  received  in  reply  a  com- 
munication from  Dr.  H.  E.  Finnegan,  Chief  of  the  Division 
of  Tides  and  Currents,  in  which  he  stated: 

.  .  .  Long  period  tide  records  from  control  stations  maintained 
by  the  Coast  and  Geodetic  Survey  show  that  there  has  been  a  rela- 
tive rise  of  sea-level  along  each  of  the  coasts  of  the  United  States. 
The  rate  of  rise  varies  somewhat  with  the  length  of  series  and  dif- 
ferent regions.  During  the  past  20  years  the  relative  rise  of  sea-level 
along  our  East  Coast  has  been  at  the  rate  of  two  hundredths  of 
a  foot  per  year.  On  our  Pacific  Coast  the  rate  has  been  somewhat 
less. 

In  Alaska,  the  tide  records  for  Ketchikan  show  no  definite  change 
in  sea-level.  At  certain  places  farther  north,  however,  the  records 
indicate  a  relative  fall  of  sea-level.  .  .  .  (152). 

This  can,  I  think,  be  regarded  as  a  summary  of  the  facts 
presently  known  on  this  subject.  It  is  plain  that  it  does  not 
add  up  to  any  universal  rise  of  the  sea  level.  Not  only  is  no 
such  rise  indicated;  exactly  the  opposite  is  implied  by  the 
facts.  The  facts  show  that  different  parts  of  the  United  States 
are  subsiding  at  different  rates,  that  Alaska  is  not  subsiding 
at  all,  and  that  places  farther  north  are  actually  rising.  What 
reason  is  there  to  bring  the  sea  into  it?  A  "eustatic"  change  in 
sea  level  is  not  indicated  by  these  facts,  but  differential  move- 
ments of  parts  of  the  continent  are.  Moreover,  the  data  come 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE    POLE  22J 

from  a  very  small  part  of  the  earth's  surface.  Equally  careful 
measurements  along  all  the  coasts  of  all  the  continents  would 
be  necessary  to  establish  the  fact  of  a  general  rise  in  sea  level. 
They  could  as  easily  establish  that  the  sea  level  is  falling. 

Additional  evidences  of  the  fall  of  the  sea  level  in  post- 
glacial times  are  provided  by  Halle,  for  the  Falkland  Islands 
(196),  by  Pollock,  for  Hawaii  (34ga),  and  by  Sayles,  for  Ber- 
muda (366a).  Umbgrove,  basing  his  statement  on  quite  other 
sources,  concludes  that  "the  sea-level  has  fallen  over  the 
whole  world  in  comparatively  recent  times*'  (430:69). 

A  quite  remarkable  bit  of  evidence  comes  from  Greenland. 
There  a  whale  was  recently  discovered  well  preserved  in  the 
permafrost  (the  permanently  frozen  ground).  It  was  dated  by 
radiocarbon,  and  found  to  be  8,500  years  old.  It  was  found 
in  beach  deposits  43.6  feet  above  the  present  sea  level.  The 
highest  beach  in  the  area  was  1  30  feet  above  the  present  sea 
level.  It  is  hard  to  see  how  the  elevation  of  this  beach  could 
be  ascribed  to  isostatic  rebound  of  the  crust  since  the  ice  age, 
for  there  has  been  no  lightening  of  the  ice  load  on  the  crust 
in  Greenland.  How,  then,  is  this  frozen  whale  to  be  inter- 
preted? I  think  we  can  accept  it  as  fairly  good  evidence  of  a 
general  fall  of  sea  level  resulting  from  the  withdrawal  of 
water  from  the  oceans  to  feed  the  growing  Antarctic  icecap. 

From  the  Philippines  comes  additional  evidence  that  in 
those  areas  where  the  sea  level  rose  at  the  end  of  the  North 
American  ice  age,  the  rise  was  of  a  magnitude  that  cannot 
be  explained  on  the  theory  of  glacial  melt  water,  but,  on  the 
contrary,  requires  the  assumption  that  important  changes 
took  place  in  the  crust  itself.  Warren  D.  Smith  has  written: 

It  must  be  said  that  the  geological  history  and  structure  of  the 
Philippines,  as  studied  in  recent  years  by  both  Dr.  Dickerson  and 
myself,  seem  to  indicate  that  the  changes  since  the  Pleistocene  in 
the  Philippines  have  been  profound  enough  to  have  caused  the 
disruption  of  land  bridges  and  to  have  brought  about  the  present 
isolation  of  its  masses  by  flooding.  .  . 


We  may  note  that  Smith  makes  no  reference  to  a  rise  of 
sea  level  because  of  the  melting  of  glaciers.  The  subsidence 


224  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

of  the  islands,  and  their  separation  from  Asia,  are  attributed 
to  deformation  of  the  earth's  crust  itself.  Moreover,  it  is  un- 
likely that  Smith  had  any  conception  of  how  recently  these 
events  occurred.  He  probably  thought  of  the  Pleistocene  (and 
the  ice  age)  as  ending  20,000  or  30,000  years  ago.  Conse- 
quently, the  structural  changes  in  the  crust  that  he  discusses 
seem  to  have  occurred  at  a  rate  which,  like  the  unwarping 
of  the  crust  in  North  America  discussed  by  Antevs,  is  in- 
consistent with  the  speeds  of  geological  change  normally 
considered  by  geologists.  There  appears  to  be  no  rational 
explanation  for  such  an  acceleration  of  the  tempo  of  geolog- 
ical change,  except  a  displacement  of  the  crust. 

There  is  another  important  problem  connected  with  the 
changes  in  sea  level.  It  seems  that  many  of  them  occurred  in 
an  abrupt  fashion,  so  suddenly  that  the  continuous  cutting 
of  the  coastline  by  the  sea  was  unable  to  keep  up  with  the 
vertical  movement  of  the  land.  Brooks  refers  to  numerous 
strandlines  at  elevations  of  about  90,  126,  and  180  feet  above 
the  present  sea  level,  which  may  be  traced  over  considerable 
areas  (52:491).  It  seems  reasonable  that  if  the  rise  of  the  land 
in  these  localities  (or  the  general  fall  of  the  sea)  was  gradual, 
the  erosive  action  of  the  sea  would  have  been  able  to  keep 
extending  the  beach  downward  continuously.  We  would 
then  have  a  continuous  beach  formation  extending  from  180 
feet  above  the  present  sea  level,  down  to  the  present  sea 
margin.  We  have,  on  the  contrary,  a  series  of  completely 
distinct  elevated  beaches.  It  would  seem  that  the  changes  in 
elevation  were  comparatively  rapid. 

There  is  a  possibility  that  this  phenomenon  is  connected 
with  the  irregularities  of  the  process  of  crust  displacement 
referred  to  above.  If  the  interstadials  and  the  repeated  re- 
advances  of  the  glaciers  during  the  North  American  ice  age 
resulted  from  the  process  I  have  described,  the  same  process 
of  storage  and  sudden  release  of  stresses  in  the  moving  crust 
could  easily  account  for  abrupt  changes  in  the  elevation  of 
sections  of  the  crust.  I  am  not  suggesting  that  they  occurred 
in  periods  of  a  few  days  or  hours.  The  facts  would  be  satisfied 


NORTH    AMERICA    AT    THE     POLE  225 

by  the  assumption  that  they  occurred  in  periods  of  the  order 
of  a  few  centuries.  But  it  is  clear  that  these  beaches  cannot  be 
accounted  for  by  a  theory  of  postglacial  upward  adjustment, 
for  there  is  no  reason  why  this  adjustment  should  have  taken 
place  in  jumps.  It  would  have  been,  by  its  nature,  a  gradual 
and  even  process. 


6.  Darwin's  Rising  Beachline  in  South  America 

A  singularly  impressive  piece  of  evidence  for  a  recent  dis- 
placement of  the  crust  may  be  found  in  the  journal  of 
Charles  Darwin.  Sir  Archibald  Geikie  summarized  Darwin's 
findings  thus: 

On  the  west  coast  of  South  America,  lines  of  raised  terraces  con- 
taining recent  shells  have  been  traced  by  Darwin  as  proofs  of  a  great 
upheaval  of  that  part  of  the  globe  in  modern  geological  time.  The 
terraces  are  not  quite  horizontal  but  rise  to  the  south.  On  the  frontier 
of  Bolivia  they  occur  from  60  to  80  feet  above  the  existing  sea-level, 
but  nearer  the  higher  mass  of  the  Chilean  Andes  they  are  found  at 
one  thousand,  and  near  Valparaiso  at  1300  feet.  That  some  of  these 
ancient  sea  margins  belong  to  the  human  period  was  shown  by  Mr. 
Darwin's  discovery  of  shells  with  bones  of  birds,  ears  of  maize,  plaited 
reeds  and  cotton  thread,  in  some  of  the  terraces  opposite  Callao 
at  a  height  of  85  feet.  Raised  beaches  occur  in  New  Zealand  and  indi- 
cate a  greater  change  of  level  in  the  southern  than  in  the  northern 
end  of  the  country.  .  .  .  (170:288). 

If  we  attempt,  by  analyzing  this  evidence  in  accordance 
with  the  assumptions  of  the  displacement  theory,  to  recon- 
struct the  course  of  events,  we  reach  the  following  conclu- 
sions: Since  the  evidence  of  human  occupation  is  found  at  an 
elevation  of  85  feet,  it  seems  reasonable  to  suppose  that  a  fall 
of  the  sea  level  of  that  extent  may  have  occurred  within  his- 
torical times.  On  the  other  hand,  the  continuously  rising 
strandline  down  the  coast  to  Valparaiso,  continued  in  New 
Zealand,  indicates  a  tilting  of  the  earth's  crust,  involving. 
South  America  and  New  Zealand,  but  not  involving  a  general 
change  in  the  sea  level.  The  magnitude  of  the  upheaval  sug- 


226  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

gests  that  it  may  have  occurred  earlier  than  the  85-foot  gen- 
eral fall  in  sea  level,  and  may  have  required  much  more  time. 
The  85-foot  fall  in  the  general  sea  level  we  may  explain  as 
the  result  of  the  withdrawal  of  water  to  Antarctica.  The  up 
tilting  of  the  continent  may  be  seen  as  the  result  of  its  pole- 
ward displacement. 

The  effect  postulated  by  Gutenberg,  to  account  for  uplift 
of  areas  displaced  poleward,  cannot  account  for  the  tilting, 
but  another  effect  may.  This  is  the  increasing  compression 
of  the  poleward-moving  sector  as  the  result  of  the  progressive 
shortening  of  the  radius  and  circumference  of  the  earth  in 
the  higher  latitudes.  The  compressions  resulting  from  this 
have  been  discussed.  They  result  inevitably  from  the  increas- 
ing arc  of  the  surface  and  the  increasing  convergence  of  the 
meridians. 


VIII  :  THE  GREAT  EXTINCTIONS 


When  this  theory  was  first  presented  to  a  group  of  scientists 
at  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  on  January  27, 
1955,  Professor  Walter  H.  Bucher,  former  President  of  the 
Geological  Society  of  America,  made  an  interesting  observa- 
tion. I  had  presented  evidence  to  support  the  contention  that 
North  America  had  been  displaced  southward  and  Antarctica 
had  been  moved  farther  into  the  Antarctic  Circle  by  the 
movement  of  the  crust  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age.  Professor 
Bucher  pointed  out  that,  if  this  were  so,  there  must  have 
been  an  equal  movement  of  the  crust  northward  on  the  op- 
posite side  of  the  earth.  He  asked  me  whether  there  was  evi- 
dence of  this.  I  said  I  thought  there  was.  I  am  presenting  the 
evidence  here. 


7.  The  Extinction  of  the  Mammoths 

The  closing  millennia  of  the  ice  age  saw  an  enormous  mortal- 
ity of  animals  in  many  parts  of  the  world.  Hibben  estimated 
that  as  many  as  40,000,000  animals  died  in  North  America 
alone  (212:168).  Many  species  of  animals  became  extinct,  in- 
cluding mammoths,  mastodons,  giant  beaver,  sabertooth  cats, 
giant  sloths,  woolly  rhinoceroses.  Camels  and  horses  appar- 
ently became  extinct  in  North  America  then  or  shortly  after- 
wards, although  one  authority  believes  a  variety  of  Pleistocene 
horse  has  survived  in  Haiti  (365).  The  paleontologist  Scott  is 
enormously  puzzled  both  by  the  great  climatic  revolution 
and  by  its  effects: 

The  extraordinary  and  inexplicable  climatic  revolutions  had  a 
profound  effect  upon  animal  life,  and  occasioned  or  at  least  ac- 
companied, the  great  extinctions,  which,  at  the  end  of  the  Pleistocene, 


228  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

decimated  the  mammals  over  three-fifths  of  the  earth's  land  sur- 
face (37^75)' 

No  one  has  been  able  to  explain  these  widespread  extinc- 
tions. I  shall  attempt  to  explain  them  as  consequences  of  the 
last  displacement  of  the  crust,  but,  since  the  extinctions  took 
place  both  in  North  America  and  in  Asia— that  is,  both  in  the 
area  presumably  moved  southward  and  in  the  area  presum- 
ably moved  northward,  I  shall  concentrate  first  on  Asia. 
There  we  shall  find  no  difficulty  in  producing  evidence  to 
show  that  the  climate  of  eastern  Siberia  grew  colder  as  North 
America  grew  warmer,  just  as  the  theory  requires. 

Among  all  the  animals  that  became  extinct  in  Asia,  the 
mammoth  has  been  the  most  studied.  This  is  because  of  its 
size;  because  of  the  great  range  of  its  distribution,  all  the 
way  from  the  New  Siberian  Islands  in  the  Arctic  Ocean, 
across  Siberia  and  Europe,  to  North  America;  because  pic- 
tures of  it  drawn  by  primitive  man  have  been  found  in  the 
caves  of  southern  France  and  Spain;  but  most  of  all,  perhaps, 
because  well-preserved  bodies  of  mammoths  have  been  found 
frozen  in  the  mud  of  Siberia  and  Alaska.  Ivory  from  these 
frozen  remains  has  provided  a  supply  for  the  ivory  trade  of 
China  and  Central  Europe  since  ancient  times. 

A  study  of  the  reports  on  the  frozen  mammoths  reveals 
some  very  remarkable  facts.  In  the  first  place,  they  increase 
in  numbers  the  farther  north  one  goes,  and  are  most  numer- 
ous in  the  New  Siberian  Islands,  which  lie  between  the  Arc- 
tic coast  of  Siberia  and  the  pole.  Secondly,  they  are  accom- 
panied by  many  other  kinds  of  animals.  Thirdly,  although 
ivory  is  easily  ruined  by  exposure  to  the  weather,  uncounted 
thousands  of  pairs  of  tusks  have  been  preserved  in  perfect 
condition  for  the  ivory  trade.  A  fourth  point  is  that  the 
bodies  of  many  mammoths  and  a  few  other  animals  have 
been  preserved  so  perfectly  (in  the  frozen  ground)  as  to  be 
edible  today.  Finally,  astonishing  as  it  may  seem,  it  is  not 
true  that  the  mammoth  was  adapted  to  a  very  cold  climate. 
I  shall  first  take  up  this  question  of  the  mammoth's  alleged 
adaptation  to  cold. 


THE     GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  229 

2.  The  Mammoth's  Adaptation  to  Cold 

It  has  long  been  taken  for  granted,  without  really  careful 
consideration,  that  the  mammoth  was  an  Arctic  animal.  The 
opinion  has  been  based  on  the  mammoth's  thick  skin,  on 
its  hairy  coat,  and  on  the  deposit  of  fat  usually  found  under 
the  skin.  Yet  it  can  be  shown  that  none  of  these  features 
mean  any  special  adaptation  to  cold. 

To  begin  with  the  skin  and  the  hair,  we  have  a  clear 
presentation  of  the  facts  by  the  French  zoologist  and  derma- 
tologist H.  Neuville.  His  report  was  published  as  long  ago 
as  1919  (325).  He  performed  a  comparative  microscopic  study 
of  sections  of  the  skin  of  a  mammoth  and  that  of  an  Indian 
elephant,  and  showed  that  they  were  identical  in  thickness 
and  in  structure.  They  were  not  merely  similar:  they  were 
exactly  the  same.  Then,  he  showed  that  the  lack  of  oil  glands 
in  the  skin  of  the  mammoth  made  the  hair  less  resistant  to 
cold  and  damp  than  the  hair  of  the  average  mammal.  In 
other  words,  the  hair  and  fur  showed  a  negative  adaptation 
to  cold.  It  turns  out  that  the  common,  ordinary  sheep  is 
better  adapted  to  Arctic  conditions: 

We  have  .  .  .  two  animals  very  nearly  related  zoologically,  the 
mammoth  and  the  elephant,  one  of  which  lived  in  severe  climates 
while  the  other  is  now  confined  to  certain  parts  of  the  torrid  zone. 
The  mammoth,  it  is  said,  was  protected  from  the  cold  by  its  fur 
and  by  the  thickness  of  its  dermis.  But  the  dermis,  as  I  have  said,  and 
as  the  illustrations  prove,  is  identical  in  the  two  instances;  if 
would  therefore  be  hard  to  attribute  a  specially  adaptive  function 
to  the  skin  of  the  mammoth.  The  fur,  much  more  dense,  it  is  true, 
on  the  mammoths  than  on  any  of  the  living  elephants,  nevertheless 
is  present  only  in  a  very  special  condition  which  is  fundamentally 
identical  in  all  of  these  animals.  Let  us  examine  the  consequences 
of  this  special  condition,  consisting,  I  may  repeat,  in  the  absence  of 
cutaneous  glands.  The  physiological  function  of  these  glands  is  very 
important.  [Neuville's  footnote  here:  It  is  merely  necessary  to  men- 
tion that  according  to  the  opinion  now  accepted,  that  of  Unna, 
the  effect  of  the  sebum  is  to  lubricate  the  fur,  thus  protecting  it 
against  disintegration,  and  that  of  the  sweat  is  to  soak  the  epidermis 


230  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

with  an  oily  liquid,  protecting  it  also  against  desiccation  and  dis- 
integration ...  the  absence  of  the  glandular  secretions  puts  the 
skin  in  a  condition  of  less  resistance  well  known  in  dermatology. 
It  is  superfluous  to  recall  that  the  sebaceous  impregnation  gives  the 
fur  in  general  its  isolating  properties  and  imparts  to  each  of  its 
elements,  the  hairs,  its  impermeability,  thanks  to  which  they  resist 
with  a  well-known  strength  all  disintegrating  agents,  and  notably 
those  which  are  atmospheric.  Everyone  knows  to  what  degree  the 
presence  of  grease  produced  by  the  sebaceous  glands  renders  wool 
resistant  and  isolating,  and  to  what  degree  the  total  lack  of  this  fatty 
matter  lessens  the  value  of  woolen  goods.  .  .  .]  (325:331-33). 

Neuville,  then,  points  out  in  the  foregoing  passage  both 
that  the  mammoth  lacks  sebaceous  glands  and  that  the  oil 
from  these  glands  is  an  important  factor  in  the  protection  of 
an  animal  against  cold.  It  is  probable,  also,  that  protection 
from  damp  is  more  important  than  protection  from  low  tem- 
perature. Oil  in  the  hair  must  certainly  impede  the  penetra- 
tion of  damp.  The  hair  of  the  mammoth,  deprived  of  oil, 
would  seem  to  offer  poor  protection  against  the  dampness 
of  an  Arctic  blizzard.  Sanderson  has  pointed  out  that  thick 
fur  by  itself  means  nothing:  a  lot  of  animals  of  the  equatorial 
jungles,  such  as  tigers,  have  a  thick  fur  (365).  Fur  by  itself 
is  not  a  feature  of  adaptation  to  cold,  and  fur  without  oil,  as 
Neuville  points  out  so  lucidly,  is,  if  anything,  a  feature  of 
adaptation  to  warmth,  not  cold. 

The  question  of  the  importance  of  oily  secretions  from  the 
skin  for  the  effectiveness  of  resistance  of  fur  or  hair  to  cold 
and  damp  is,  however,  highly  involved.  Very  many  inquir- 
ies directed  to  specialists  in  universities,  medical  schools, 
and  research  institutes  over  a  period  of  more  than  five  years 
failed  to  elicit  sufficiently  clear  and  definite  answers  until, 
finally,  Dr.  Thomas  S.  Argyris,  Professor  of  Zoology  at 
Brown  University,  referred  me  to  the  Headquarters  Research 
and  Development  Command  of  the  United  States  Army. 
This  agency,  in  turn,  very  kindly  referred  me  to  the  British 
Wool  Industries  Research  Association.  I  addressed  an  in- 
quiry to  them,  regarding  the  effects  of  natural  oil  secre- 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  231 

tions  from  the  skin  on  the  preservation  of  wool.  They  replied 
in  general  confirmation  of  Neuville: 

.  .  .  Those  interested  in  wool  assume  that  the  function  of  the 
wool  wax  is  to  protect  the  wool  fibres  from  the  weather  and  to 
maintain  the  animal  in  a  dry  and  warm  condition.  Arguments  in 
this  direction  are  of  course  mainly  speculative.  We  do  know,  however, 
that  shorn  wool  in  its  natural  state  can  be  stored  and  transported 
without  entanglement  (or  felting)  of  the  fibres,  while  scoured  wool 
becomes  entangled  so  that,  during  subsequent  processing,  fibre 
breakage  at  the  card  is  significantly  increased.  It  seems  reasonable, 
therefore,  to  assume  that  the  wool  wax  is  responsible  not  only  for 
conferring  protection  against  the  weather  but  also  for  the  mainte- 
nance of  the  fleece  in  an  orderly  and  hence  more  efficacious  state 
(458). 

It  appears  that  there  has  been  no  scientific  study  of  the  pre- 
cise points  at  issue  here;  no  one  has  measured  in  any  scien- 
tific way  the  quantitative  effect  of  oily  secretions  in  keeping 
heat  in  or  moisture  out.  Despite  this  fact,  however,  we  are 
at  least  justified,  on  the  basis  of  the  facts  cited  above,  in  re- 
jecting the  claims  advanced  for  the  hair  of  the  mammoth  as 
an  adaptive  feature  to  a  very  cold  climate. 

Neuville  goes  on  to  destroy  one  or  two  other  arguments 
in  favor  of  the  mammoth's  adaptation  to  cold: 

...  It  has  been  thought  that  the  reduction  of  the  ears,  thick  and 
very  small  relatively  to  those  of  the  existing  elephants,  might  be  so 
understood  in  this  sense;  such  large  and  thin  ears  as  those  of  the 
elephants  would  probably  be  very  sensitive  to  the  action  of  cold. 
But  it  has  also  been  suggested  that  the  fattiness  and  peculiar  form 
of  the  tail  of  the  mammoth  was  an  adaptive  character  of  the  same 
kind;  however,  it  is  to  the  fat  rumped  sheep,  animals  of  the  hot 
regions,  whose  range  extends  to  the  center  of  Africa,  that  we  must 
go  for  an  analogue  to  the  last  character. 

It  is  therefore,  only  thanks  to  entirely  superficial  comparisons 
which  do  not  stand  a  somewhat  detailed  analysis,  that  it  has  been 
possible  to  regard  the  mammoth  as  adapted  to  the  cold.  On  account 
of  the  peculiar  character  of  the  pelage  the  animal  was,  on  the  con- 
trary, at  a  disadvantage  in  this  respect  (325:331-33). 

There  remains  the  question  of  the  layer  of  fat,  about 
three  inches  thick,  which  is  found  under  the  skin  of  the 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

mammoth.  This  fat  is  thought  to  have  provided  insulation 
against  the  bitter  cold  of  the  Siberian  winter. 

The  best  opinion  of  physiologists  is  opposed  to  the  view 
that  the  storage  of  fat  by  animals  is  a  measure  of  self-pro- 
tection against  cold.  The  consensus  is,  on  the  contrary,  that 
large  fat  accumulation  testifies  chiefly  to  ample  food  supply, 
obtainable  without  much  effort,  as,  indeed,  is  the  case  with 
human  beings.  Physiologists  agree  that  resistance  to  cold  is 
mainly  a  question  of  the  metabolic  rate,  rather  than  of  in- 
sulation by  fat.  Since  the  length  of  capillaries  in  a  cubic 
inch  of  fat  is  less  than  the  length  of  capillaries  in  a  cubic 
inch  of  muscle,  blood  circulation  would  be  better  in  a  thin 
animal.  We  might  ask  the  question,  Which  would  be  more 
likely  to  survive  through  a  Siberian  winter,  a  man  burdened 
with  fifty  or  a  hundred  pounds  of  surplus  fat  or  a  man  of 
normal  build  who  was  all  solid  muscle,  assuming  that  winter 
conditions  would  mean  a  hard  struggle  to  obtain  food?  Dr. 
Charles  P.  Lyman,  Professor  of  Zoology  at  Harvard,  re- 
marked, regarding  this  question  of  fat: 

It  is  true  that  many  animals  become  obese  before  the  winter  sets 
in,  but  for  the  most  part  it  seems  likely  that  they  become  obese 
because  they  have  an  ample  food  supply  in  the  fall,  rather  than 
that  they  are  stimulated  by  cold  to  lay  down  a  supply  of  fat.  Cold 
will  ordinarily  increase  the  metabolic  rate  of  any  animal  which  means 
that  it  burns  up  more  fuel  in  order  to  maintain  its  ordinary  weight, 
to  say  nothing  of  adding  weight  in  the  form  of  fat.  The  amount  of 
muscular  activity  in  the  daily  life  of  either  type  of  elephant  is 
certainly  just  as  important  as  the  stimulus  of  cold  as  far  as  laying 
down  a  supply  of  fat  is  concerned  (284). 

This  statement  suggests  that  there  is  no  basis  for  the  as- 
sumption that  the  fat  of  the  mammoths  adapted  them  to  an 
Arctic  climate.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  quite  true  that  the 
storage  of  fat  in  the  fall  may  help  animals  to  get  through 
the  winter  when  food  is  scarce.  The  winter  does  not,  how- 
ever, have  to  be  an  Arctic  winter.  A  white*  such  as  we  have 
in  temperate  climates  is  quite  cold  enough  to  cut  the  avail- 
able food  supply  for  herbivorous  animals.  It  seems  that  under 


THE     GREAT    EXTINCTIONS 

favorable  circumstances  even  the  African  and  Indian  ele- 
phants accumulate  quite  a  lot  of  fat.  F.  G.  Benedict,  in  his 
comprehensive  work  on  the  physiology  of  the  elephant,  con- 
siders it  a  fatty  animal  (27). 

The  resemblances  between  the  mammoth  and  the  Indian 
elephant  extend  further  than  the  identity  of  their  skins  in 
thickness  and  structure,  and  the  fact  that  they  were  both  fatty 
animals.  Bell  suggests  that  they  were  only  two  varieties  of  the 
same  species: 

Falconer  insists  on  the  importance  of  the  fact  that  throughout  the 
whole  geological  history  of  each  species  of  elephant  there  is  a  great 
persistence  in  the  structure  and  mode  of  growth  of  each  of  the 
teeth,  and  that  this  is  the  best  single  character  by  which  to  distinguish 
the  species  from  one  another.  He  finds,  after  a  critical  examination 
of  a  great  number  of  specimens,  that  in  the  mammoth  each  of  the 
molars  is  subject  to  the  same  history  and  same  variation  as  the  cor- 
responding molar  in  the  living  Indian  elephant  (25). 

It  is  clear  that  the  similarities  in  the  life  histories  of  each 
of  the  teeth  of  these  two  animals  are  more  important  than  the 
differences  in  the  shapes  of  the  teeth,  which  were  such  as 
might  easily  occur  in  two  varieties  of  the  same  species.  It 
cannot  be  denied  that  two  varieties  of  the  same  species  may 
be  adapted  to  different  climates,  but  it  must  be  conceded 
that  the  adaptation  of  two  varieties  of  the  same  species,  one 
to  tropical  jungles  and  the  other  to  Arctic  conditions,  is 
against  the  probabilities. 


3.   The  Present  Climate  of  Siberia 

,  are  ar 
The  people  who  lay  the  greatest  st^  rudde**16  adaptation  of 

the  mammoth  to  cold  ignore  the  ouier  a^mals  that  lived 
with  the  mammoths.  Yet  we  know  that  along  with  the  mil- 
lions of  mammoths,  the  northern  Siberian  plains  also  sup- 
ported vast  numbers  of  rhinoceroses,  antelope,  horses,  bison, 
and  other  herbivorous  creatures,  while  a  variety  of  carnivores, 
including  the  sabertooth  cat,  preyed  upon  them.  What  good 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

does  it  do  to  argue  that  the  mammoth  was  adapted  to  cold 
when  it  is  impossible  to  use  the  argument  in  the  case  of  sev- 
eral of  the  other  animals? 

Like  the  mammoths,  these  other  animals  ranged  to  the  far 
north,  to  the  extreme  north  of  Siberia,  to  the  shores  of  the 
Arctic  Ocean,  and  yet  farther  north  to  the  Lyakhov  and  New 
Siberian  Islands,  only  a  very  short  distance  from  the  pole. 
It  has  been  claimed  that  all  the  remains  on  the  islands  may 
have  been  washed  there  from  the  mouths  of  the  Siberian 
rivers  by  spring  floods;  I  shall  consider  this  suggestion  a  little 
later. 

So  far  as  the  present  climate  of  Siberia  itself  is  concerned, 
Nordenskjold  made  the  following  observations  of  monthly 
averages  of  daily  Centigrade  temperatures  during  the  year 
along  the  Lena  River  (334): 

January  —48.9  July  154 

February  — 47.2  August  11.9 

March  — 33.9  September  2.3 

April  — 14  October  — 13.9 

May  —  0.14  November  — 39.1 

June                   13.4  December  — 45.1 

The  average  for  the  whole  year  was  — 16.7.  Since  zero  in  the 
Centigrade  scale  is  the  freezing  point  of  water,  it  will  be 
seen  that  only  one  or  two  months  in  the  year  are  reasonably 
^ee  from  frost.  Even  so,  there  must  be  frequent  frosts  in 
'jr  .  notwithstanding  occasional  high  midday  temperatures. 
No  (3!uai  H  was  knwledge  of  these  conditions  that  caused 
the  great  fc^  jf  modern  geology,  Sir  Charles  Lyell,  to 

remark  that  it  ->st$  tha  tofl^  J*  be  impossible  for  herds  of 
mammoths  and  t.the  m^  .v3  *°  subsist,  throughout  the  year, 
even  in  the  southern  part:  of  Siberia.  .  .  . 

If  this  is  the  case  with  Siberia,  what  are  we  to  think  when 
we  contemplate  the  New  Siberian  Islands?  There  the  re- 
mains of  mammoths  and  other  animals  are  most  numerous 
of  all.  There  Baron  Toll  found  remains  of  a  sabertooth  cat, 
and  a  fruit  tree  that  had  been  ninety  feet  high  when  it  was 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS 

standing.  The  tree  was  very  perfectly  preserved  in  the  perma- 
frost, with  its  roots  and  seeds  (113:151).  Toll  claimed  that 
green  leaves  and  ripe  fruit  still  clung  to  its  branches.  Yet,  at 
the  present  time,  the  only  representative  of  tree  vegetation 
on  the  islands  is  a  willow  that  grows  one  inch  high. 

Now  let  us  return  to  the  question  of  whether  all  these  re- 
mains were  floated  out  to  the  islands  on  spring  floods.  Let  us 
begin  with  a  backward  view  at  the  history  of  these  islands. 
Saks,  Belov,  and  Lapina  point  to  evidence  that  there  were 
luxuriant  forests  growing  on  the  New  Siberian  Islands  in 
Miocene  and  perhaps  Pliocene  times  (364).  At  the  beginning 
of  the  Pleistocene  the  islands  were  connected  with  the  main- 
land, and  the  mammoths  ranged  over  them.  In  the  opinion 
of  these  writers  the  vast  numbers  of  mammoth  remains  on 
Great  Lyakhov  Island  indicate  that  they  took  refuge  on  the 
island  when  the  land  was  sinking  (364:4,  note).  There  is  no 
evidence  that  they  were  washed  across  the  intervening  sea. 

The  improbabilities  in  this  suggestion  of  transportation  of 
these  hundreds  of  thousands  of  animal  bodies  across  the 
entire  width  of  the  Nordenskjold  Sea,  for  a  distance  of  more 
than  200  miles  from  the  mouth  of  the  Lena  River,  are  simply 
out  of  all  reason.  Let  us  see  exactly  what  is  involved. 

First,  we  should  have  to  explain  why  the  hundreds  of  thou- 
sands of  animals  fell  into  the  river.  To  be  sure,  they  did  not 
fall  in  all  at  once;  nevertheless,  they  must  have  had  the  habit 
of  falling  into  the  river  in  very  large  numbers,  because  only 
one  body  in  a  very  great  many  could  possibly  float  across  200 
miles  of  ocean.  Of  those  that  floated  at  all  only  a  few  would 
be  likely  to  float  in  precisely  the  correct  direction  to  reach 
the  islands.  Islands,  even  large  ones,  are  amazingly  easy  to 
miss  even  in  a  boat  equipped  with  a  rudder  and  charts.  The 
Lena  River  has  three  mouths,  one  of  which  points  in  a  direc- 
tion away  from  the  islands.  The  two  other  mouths  face  the 
islands  across  these  200  miles  of  ocean.  Occasionally,  a  piece 
of  driftwood  might  float  across  the  intervening  sea.  Occa- 
sionally, perhaps,  an  animal— if  for  some  reason  it  did  not 
happen  to  sink,  if  it  were  not  eaten  by  fishes— might  be 


236  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

washed  up  on  the  shore  of  one  of  the  islands.  It  seems  proba- 
ble that  only  an  incredibly  powerful  current  could  transport 
the  body  of  a  mammoth  across  200  miles  of  ocean. 

But  let  us  suppose  that  somehow  the  animals  are  trans- 
ported across  the  ocean.  What  then?  The  greatest  of  the  New 
Siberian  Islands  is  about  150  miles  long  and  about  half  as 
wide.  Not  one  single  account  of  the  explorations  on  these 
islands  has  mentioned  that  the  animal  remains  are  found 
only  along  the  beaches.  They  are  obviously  found  also  in  the 
interior.  Are  we  to  suppose  that  the  floods  of  the  Lena  River 
were  so  immense  that  they  could  inundate  the  New  Siberian 
Islands,  200  miles  at  sea?  It  is  safe  to  say  that  all  the  rivers 
of  Europe  and  Asia  put  together,  at  full  flood,  would  fail  to 
raise  the  ocean  level  200  miles  off  the  coast  by  more  than  a 
few  inches  at  most. 

But,  again,  let  us  suppose  that  the  remains  were  merely 
washed  to  the  present  coasts,  and  not  into  the  interior.  How 
then  were  they  preserved?  How  were  hundreds  of  thousands 
of  mammoths  placed  above  high-water  mark?  Storms,  no 
doubt,  but  whatever  storms  can  wash  up,  other  storms  can 
wash  away.  No  accumulation  of  anything  occurs  along  the 
coasts  because  of  storms.  All  that  storms  can  do  is  to  destroy; 
they  can  grind  up  and  destroy  anything.  And  they  would 
have  ground  up  and  destroyed  all  the  bodies,  including,  of 
course,  the  go-foot  fruit  tree  with  its  branches,  roots,  seeds, 
green  leaves,  and  ripe  fruit. 

I  think  it  is  plain  that  the  only  reason  suggestions  of  this 
kind  are  advanced  is  that  there  is  need  to  support  some 
theory  that  has  been  developed  to  explain  some  other  part  of 
the  evidence,  some  local  problem.  Moreover,  there  is  need, 
always  need,  to  discredit  the  evidence  that  argues  for  drastic 
climatic  changes. 

Naturally,  the  knowledge  that  the  Arctic  islands,  though 
they  are  now  in  polar  darkness  much  of  the  year,  were  in 
very  recent  geologic  times  able  to  grow  the  flourishing 
forests  of  a  temperate  climate,  eliminates  any  need  to  in- 
sist that  they  were  always  as  cold  as  they  are  today.  Thus, 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  237 

it  is  not  a  question  at  all  of  whether  the  climate  grew 
colder,  but  merely  a  question  of  when  the  change  oc- 
curred. I  have  already  discussed  the  evidence  showing  that 
it  occurred  (for  the  last  time,  anyway)  when  North  Amer- 
ica moved  southward  from  the  pole. 

Campbell  has  contributed  a  suggestion  with  regard  to 
the  alleged  floating  of  hundreds  of  thousands  of  bodies 
across  the  Nordenskjold  Sea.  He  notes  that  bodies  ordinarily 
float  because  of  gas  produced  by  decomposition.  Decomposi- 
tion is  at  a  minimum  in  very  cold  water,  and  therefore  bodies 
ordinarily  do  not  float  in  very  cold  water.  As  an  example  of 
this  he  points  to  a  peculiarity  of  Lake  Superior.  The  waters 
of  this  lake  are  very  cold.  This  may  be  because  they  are  sup- 
plied, as  some  people  think,  by  underground  springs  from 
the  Rocky  Mountains,  far  away.  And  there  is  an  old  saying 
in  the  lake  region  that  "Lake  Superior  never  gives  up  its 
dead."  But  the  Arctic  Ocean  is  as  cold  as  the  springs  fed  by 
the  glaciers  of  the  Rockies.  The  water  of  the  Lena  would 
not  be  warm  even  in  midsummer,  but  during  the  spring 
floods— when  the  Lena  would  be  swollen  with  the  melt  water 
of  the  winter  snows— the  water  at  such  times  would  be  frigid, 
and  the  bodies  of  animals  drowned  in  it  would  not  decom- 
pose, nor  would  they  float.  They  would  tend  to  sink,  instead, 
into  the  nearest  hole,  and  never  come  to  the  surface. 


4.  A  Sudden  Change  of  Climate? 

We  may  reasonably  conclude  that  the  climate  of  Siberia 
changed  at  the  end  of  the  Pleistocene,  and  that  it  grew  colder. 
Our  problem  is  to  discover  what  process  of  change  was  in- 
volved. On  the  one  hand,  our  theory  of  displacement  of  the 
crust  involves  a  considerable  period  of  time,  and  a  gradual 
movement;  on  the  other  hand,  the  discovery  of  complete 
bodies  of  mammoths  and  other  animals  in  Siberia,  so  well 
preserved  in  the  frozen  ground  as  to  be  in  some  cases  still 
edible,  seems  to  argue  a  cataclysmic  change. 


238  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

To  those  who,  in  the  past,  have  argued  for  a  very  sudden 
catastrophe,  the  specialists  in  the  field  have  offered  opposing 
theories  to  explain  the  preservation  of  the  bodies.  One  of 
these  was  that  as  the  mammoths  walked  over  the  frozen 
ground,  over  the  snow  fields,  they  may  have  fallen  into  pits 
or  crevasses  and  been  swallowed  up  and  permanently  frozen. 
Or,  again,  they  might  either  have  broken  through  river  ice 
and  been  drowned,  or  they  might  have  got  bogged  while 
feeding  along  the  banks. 

There  is  no  doubt  that  a  certain  number  of  animals  could 
have  been  put  into  the  frozen  ground  in  just  the  manner  sug- 
gested above.  That  this  is  the  explanation  for  the  preserva- 
tion of  the  mammoths'  bodies  generally,  however,  is  unlikely 
for  a  number  of  reasons. 

It  is  not  generally  realized,  in  the  first  place,  that  it  is  not 
merely  a  matter  of  the  accidental  preservation  of  eighty-odd 
mammoths  and  half  a  dozen  rhinoceroses  that  have  been 
found  in  the  permafrost.  These  few  could  perhaps  be  ac- 
counted for  by  individual  accidents,  provided,  of  course,  that 
we  agreed  that  the  animals  concerned  were  Arctic  animals. 
The  sudden  freezing  and  consequent  preservation  of  the 
flesh  of  these  animals  might  be  thus  explained.  But  there  is 
another  factor  of  great  importance,  which  has  been  con- 
sistently neglected.  It  has  been  overlooked  that  meat  is  not 
the  only  thing  that  has  to  be  frozen  quickly  in  order  to  be 
preserved.  The  same  is  true  of  ivory.  Ivory,  it  appears,  spoils 
very  quickly  when  it  dries  out. 

Tens  of  thousands  of  skeletons  and  individual  bones  of 
many  kinds  of  animals  have  been  discovered  in  the  perma- 
frost. Among  them  have  been  found  the  enormous  numbers 
of  mammoths'  tusks  already  mentioned.  To  be  of  any  use 
for  carving,  tusks  must  come  either  from  freshly  killed  ani- 
mals or  have  been  frozen  very  quickly  after  the  deaths  of  the 
animals,  and  kept  frozen.  Ivory  experts  testify  that  if  tusks 
are  exposed  to  the  weather  they  dry  out,  lose  their  animal 
matter,  and  become  useless  for  carving  (280:361-66). 

According  to  Lydekker,  about  20,000  pairs  of  tusks,  in 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  239 

perfect  condition,  were  exported  for  the  ivory  trade  in  the 
few  decades  preceding  1899,  yet  even  now  there  is  no  end 
in  sight.  According  to  Digby,  about  a  quarter  of  all  the  mam- 
moth tusks  found  in  Siberia  are  in  good  enough  condition 
for  ivory  turning  (113:177).  This  means  that  hundreds  of 
thousands  of  individuals,  not  merely  eighty  or  so,  must  have 
been  frozen  immediately  after  death,  and  remained  frozen. 
Obviously,  it  is  unreasonable  to  attempt  to  account  for  these 
hundreds  of  thousands  of  individuals  by  the  assumption  of 
such  rare  individual  accidents  as  have  been  suggested  above. 
Some  powerful  general  force  was  certainly  at  work.  Lydekker 
gives  many  hints  of  the  nature  of  this  force  in  the  following 
passage: 

...  In  many  instances,  as  is  well  known,  entire  carcasses  of  the 
mammoth  have  been  found  thus  buried,  with  the  hair,  skin  and  flesh 
as  fresh  as  in  frozen  New  Zealand  sheep  in  the  hold  of  a  steamer. 
And  sleigh  dogs,  as  well  as  Yakuts  themselves,  have  often  made  a 
hearty  meal  on  mammoth  flesh  thousands  of  years  old.  In  instances 
like  these  it  is  evident  that  mammoths  must  have  been  buried  and 
frozen  almost  immediately  after  death;  but  as  the  majority  of  the 
tusks  appear  to  be  met  with  in  an  isolated  condition,  often  heaped 
one  atop  another,  it  would  seem  that  the  carcasses  were  often  broken 
up  by  being  carried  down  the  rivers  before  their  final  entombment. 
Even  then,  however,  the  burial,  or  at  least  the  freezing,  must  have 
taken  place  comparatively  quickly  as  exposure  in  their  ordinary  con- 
dition would  speedily  deteriorate  the  quality  of  the  ivory  (280:363). 

He  continues: 

How  the  mammoths  were  enabled  to  exist  in  a  region  where  their 
remains  became  so  speedily  frozen,  and  how  such  vast  quantities  of 
them  became  accumulated  at  certain  spots,  are  questions  that  do  not 
at  present  seem  capable  of  being  satisfactorily  answered;  and  their 
discussion  would  accordingly  be  useless.  .  .  .  (280:363). 

Lydekker  was  not  alone  in  feeling  the  futility  of  considering 
these  mysterious  facts.  For  many  years,  in  this  field  as  in 
others,  there  has  been  a  tendency  to  put  away  questions  that 
could  not  be  answered.  However,  we  shall  return  to  his  state- 
ment. I  shall  try  to  show  later  on  how  all  the  details  of  the 
phenomena  he  describes  can  be  made  understandable.  For 


240  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

the  moment,  I  would  like  to  point  out  simply  that  some  sort 
of  abrupt  climatic  change  is  required.  This  conclusion  is  re- 
inforced by  the  results  of  recent  research  in  the  frozen  foods 
industry.  This  has  produced  evidence  that  throws  additional 
doubt  on  the  theory  of  the  preservation  of  the  bodies  of 
mammoths  by  individual  accidents.  It  seems  that  the  preser- 
vation of  meat  by  freezing  requires  some  rather  special  condi- 
tions. Herbert  Harris,  in  an  article  on  Birdseye  in  Science 
Digest,  writes: 

What  Birdseye  had  proved  was  that  the  faster  a  food  can  be  frozen 
at  "deep"  temperatures  of  around  minus  40  degrees  Fahrenheit,  the 
less  chance  there  is  of  forming  the  large  ice  crystals  that  tear  down 
cellular  walls  and  tissues  leaving  gaps  through  which  escape  the 
natural  juices,  nutriment  and  flavor  (202:3). 

Harris  quotes  one  of  Birdseye's  engineers  as  saying: 

.  .  .  take  poultry  giblets;  they  can  last  eight  months  at  10  below  zero, 
but  "turn"  in  four  weeks  above  it.  Or  lobster.  It  lasts  24  months  at 
10  below  but  less  than  twenty  days  at  anything  above.  .  .  .  (202:5). 

In  the  light  of  these  statements  the  description  of  the 
frozen  mammoth  flesh  given  by  F.  F.  Herz  is  very  illumi- 
nating. Quoted  by  Bassett  Digby  in  his  book  on  the  mam- 
moth, Herz  said  that  "the  flesh  is  fibrous  and  marbled  with 
fat."  It  'looks  as  fresh  as  well  frozen  beef."  And  this  remark 
is  made  of  flesh  known  to  have  been  frozen  for  thousands  of 
years!  Some  people  have  reported  that  they  have  been  made 
ill  by  eating  this  preserved  meat,  but  occasionally,  at  least,  it 
is  really  perfectly  edible.  Thus  Mr.  Joseph  Barnes,  former 
correspondent  of  the  New  York  Herald  Tribune,  remarked 
on  the  delicious  flavor  of  some  mammoth  meat  served  to  him 
at  a  dinner  at  the  Academy  of  Sciences  in  Moscow  in  the 
i93o's  (24). 

What  Birdseye  proved  was  that  meat  to  remain  in  edible 
condition  must  be  kept  very  cold—not  merely  frozen,  but  at 
a  temperature  far  below  the  freezing  point.  What  the  edible 
mammoth  steaks  proved  was  that  meat  had  been  so  kept  in 
at  least  a  few  cases  for  perhaps  10,000  to  15,000  years  in  the 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  241 

Siberian  tundra.  It  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that  the  same 
cause  that  was  responsible  for  the  preservation  of  the  meat 
also  preserved  the  ivory;  and  therefore  that  tens  or  hundreds 
of  thousands  of  animals  were  killed  in  the  same  way. 

How  can  such  low  temperatures  for  the  original  freeze  be 
reconciled  with  the  idea  of  individual  accidents  unless  at 
least  the  animals  died  in  the  middle  of  the  winter?  It  is  quite 
certain  that  such  temperatures  could  never  have  prevailed 
at  the  surface  or  in  mudholes  during  "spring  freshets."  Ripe 
seeds  and  buttercups,  found  in  the  stomach  of  one  of  the 
mammoths,  to  be  discussed  later,  showed  that  his  death  took 
place  in  the  middle  of  the  summer.  It  is  obvious  that  during 
the  summer  the  temperature  at  the  top  of  the  permafrost 
zone  was  and  is  32°  F.  or  o°  Centigrade,  neither  more  nor 
less,  since  by  definition  that  is  where  melting  begins.  And 
from  that  point  down  there  would  be  only  a  relatively 
gradual  fall  in  the  prevailing  temperature  of  the  permafrost. 

Even  if  mammoths  died  in  the  winter,  it  is  difficult  to  see 
how  very  many  of  them  could  have  become  well  enough 
buried  to  have  escaped  the  warming  effects  of  the  thaws  of 
thousands  of  springs  and  summers,  which  would  have  rotted 
both  the  meat  and  the  ivory,  unless  there  was  a  change  of 
climate. 

The  theory  that  mammoths  may  have  been  preserved  by 
falls  into  pits  or  into  rivers  encounters  further  objections. 
Tolmachev,  the  Russian  authority,  pointed  out  that  the  re- 
mains are  often  found  at  high  points— on  the  highest  points 
of  the  tundra  (422:51).  He  notes  that  the  bodies  are  found 
in  frozen  ground,  and  not  in  ice,  and  that  they  must  have 
been  buried  in  mud  before  freezing.  This  presents  a  serious 
problem  because,  as  he  says, 

...  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  swamps  and  bogs  of  a  moderate  climate 
with  their  treacherous  pits,  in  northern  Siberia,  owing  to  the  perma- 
nently frozen  ground,  could  exist  only  in  quite  exceptional  conditions 
(422:57)- 

Ho  worth  remarked  on  this  same  problem: 


242  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

While  it  is  on  the  one  hand  clear  that  the  ground  in  which  the 
bodies  are  found  has  been  hard  frozen  since  the  carcasses  were  en- 
tombed, it  is  no  less  inevitable  that  when  these  same  carcasses  were 
originally  entombed,  the  ground  must  have  been  soft  and  unfrozen. 
You  cannot  thrust  flesh  into  hard  frozen  earth  without  destroying  it 


Since  Tolmachev  can  think  of  no  other  solution  to  this 
problem,  he  finds  himself  forced  to  conclude  that  the  mam- 
moths got  trapped  in  mud  when  feeding  on  river  terraces. 
We  have  seen  that  this  conflicts  seriously  with  the  conditions 
of  temperature  required  for  the  preservation  of  the  meat, 
whether  they  were  feeding  on  the  terraces  during  the  sum- 
mer, when,  presumably,  the  fresh  grass  supply  would  be 
available  there,  or  whether  they  were  shoving  aside  the  heavy 
snowdrifts  during  the  winter  to  attempt  to  get  at  the  dead 
grass  below.  For  in  either  case  they  would  fall  into  unfrozen 
water,  the  temperature  of  which  could  not  be  lower  than  32° 
Fahrenheit.  Furthermore,  if  this  is  the  way  it  happened,  why 
are  the  animals  often  found  on  the  highest  point  of  the 
tundra? 

Thus  we  see  that  the  further  we  get  into  this  question  the 
thornier  it  becomes.  We  shall  have,  for  one  thing,  to  face  the 
problem  of  the  apparently  sudden  original  freeze.  How  sud- 
den, indeed,  must  it  have  been?  How  can  we  account  for  it 
on  the  assumption  of  a  comparatively  slow  displacement  of 
the  earth's  crust?  So  far  as  the  first  question  is  concerned, 
recent  research  has  contributed  interesting  new  data. 

Research  on  the  mechanics  of  the  freezing  process  and  its 
effects  on  animal  tissues  has  been  carried  forward  consider- 
ably since  the  experiments  conducted  by  Birdseye's  engi- 
neers. In  a  recent  article  in  Science,  Meryman  summarizes 
the  recent  findings.  These  are  based  on  extremely  thorough 
laboratory  research,  and  they  modify,  to  some  extent,  the 
Birdseye  findings. 

Meryman  shows  that  initial  freezing  at  deep  temperatures 
is  not  required  for  the  preservation  of  meat.  On  the  contrary, 
such  sudden  deep  freeze  may  destroy  the  cells.  He  remarks, 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  24$ 

"Lovelock  considers  — 5°  C.  as  the  lowest  temperature  to 
which  mammalian  cells  may  be  slowly  frozen  and  still  sur- 
vive." Furthermore,  the  tissues  survive  gradual  freezing  very 
well: 

In  most,  if  not  all,  soft  tissue  cells  there  is  no  gross  membrane  rup- 
ture by  slow  freezing.  Even  though  it  is  frozen  for  long  periods  of 
time,  upon  thawing  the  water  is  reimbibed  by  the  cells,  and  their 
immediate  histological  appearance  is  often  indistinguishable  from  the 
normal. 

It  appears  that  what  damages  the  cells  is  dehydration,  caused 
by  the  withdrawal  of  water  from  them  to  be  incorporated  in 
the  ice.  This  process  goes  on  after  the  initial  freezing: 

.  .  .  The  principal  cause  of  injury  from  slow  freezing  is  not  the 
physical  presence  of  extracellular  ice  crystals,  but  the  denaturation 
incurred  by  the  dehydration  resulting  from  the  incorporation  of  all 
free  water  into  ice  (304:518-19). 

There  are  only  two  known  ways,  according  to  Meryman,  to 
prevent  this  damage.  First,  ".  .  .  the  temperature  may  be 
reduced  immediately  after  freezing  to  very  low,  stabilizing 
temperatures."  The  other  way  is  artificial;  it  consists  of  using 
glycerine  to  bind  water  in  the  liquid  state,  preventing  freez- 
ing. 

Meryman  shows  that  once  the  temperature  has  fallen  to 
a  very  low  point,  it  must  remain  at  that  point  if  the  frozen 
product  is  to  escape  serious  damage.  The  reason  for  this  is 
that  except  at  these  low  temperatures,  a  recrystallization 
process  may  take  place  in  ice,  in  which  numerous  small 
crystals  are  combined  into  large  ones.  The  growth  of  the 
large  crystals  may  disrupt  cells  and  membranes.  He  remarks: 

At  very  low  temperatures,  recrystallization  is  relatively  slow,  and 
equilibrium  is  approached  while  the  crystals  are  quite  small.  At 
temperatures  near  the  melting  point,  recrystallization  is  rapid,  and 
the  crystals  may  grow  to  nearly  visible  size  in  less  than  an  hour  (304: 
518). 

I  am  reminded,  in  writing  these  lines,  of  my  experience  in 
truck  gardening.  In  trying  to  reduce  damage  from  frost,  I 


244  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

often  resorted  to  a  method  that  was  effective  but  mysterious, 
for  I  could  not  understand  why  it  worked.  I  learned  that  if 
the  vegetables  got  frosted— even  heavily  frosted—they  would 
not  be  seriously  damaged  if  I  could  manage  to  get  out  before 
sunrise  and  thoroughly  hose  them  off,  washing  away  the 
frost.  If,  however,  the  sun  should  rise  before  I  was  finished, 
the  unwashed  vegetables  would  be  damaged.  It  would  seem, 
according  to  the  explanation  given  by  Meryman,  that  the 
frost  damage  was  the  result  of  recrystallization  of  the  ice  that 
had  formed  within  the  vegetable  fibers.  Small  crystals,  grow- 
ing into  large  ones  in  the  hour  or  so  before  the  sun  was  up 
far  enough  to  melt  them,  evidently  caused  the  damage. 

It  follows,  from  this  analysis  of  the  mechanics  of  freezing, 
that  the  preservation  of  mammoth  meat  for  thousands  of 
years  may  be  accounted  for  by  normal  initial  freezing,  fol- 
lowed by  a  sharp  fall  in  temperature.  Whenever  the  meat 
was  preserved  in  an  edible  condition  the  deep  freeze  must 
have  been  uninterrupted;  there  must  have  been  no  thaws 
sufficient  to  bring  the  temperature  near  the  freezing  point. 

Let  us  now  take  a  closer  look  at  one  of  these  preserved 
mammoths,  and  see  what  it  may  have  to  tell  us. 


5.  The  Beresovka  Mammoth 

Perhaps  the  most  famous  individual  mammoth  found  pre- 
served in  the  permafrost  was  the  so-called  Beresovka  mam- 
moth. This  mammoth  was  discovered  sticking  out  of  the 
ground  not  far  from  the  bank  of  the  Beresovka  River  in 
Siberia  about  1901.  Word  of  it  reached  the  capital,  St.  Peters- 
burg. It  so  happened  that,  a  long  time  before,  word  of 
another  mammoth  had  come  to  the  ears  of  Tsar  Peter  the 
Great.  With  his  strong  interest  in  natural  science,  the  Tsar 
had  issued  a  ukase  ordering  that  whenever  thereafter  another 
mammoth  was  discovered,  an  expedition  should  be  sent  out 
by  his  Imperial  Academy  of  Sciences  to  study  it. 

In  accordance  with  this  standing  order,  a  group  of  dis- 


THE     GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  245 

tinguished  academicians  entrained  at  St.  Petersburg  and  pro- 
ceeded to  the  remote  district  of  Siberia  where  the  creature 
had  been  reported.  When  they  arrived  they  found  that  the 
wolves  had  chewed  off  such  parts  of  the  mammoth  as  projected 
aboveground,  but  most  of  the  carcass  was  still  intact.  They 
erected  a  structure  over  the  body,  and  built  fires  so  as  to  thaw 
the  ground  and  permit  the  removal  of  the  remains.  This 
process  was  hardly  agreeable,  since,  the  moment  the  meat 
began  to  thaw,  the  stench  became  terrific.  However,  several 
academicians  remarked  that  after  a  little  exposure  to  the 
stench,  they  became  used  to  it.  They  ended  by  hardly  notic- 
ing it. 

Eventually  the  body  of  the  entire  mammoth  was  removed 
from  the  ground.  The  academicians,  meantime,  made  careful 
observations  of  its  original  position.  They  saw  evidence  that, 
in  their  opinion,  the  mammoth  had  been  mired  in  the  mud. 
It  looked  as  if  its  last  struggles  had  been  to  get  out  of  the 
mud,  and  as  if  it  had  frozen  to  death  in  a  half-standing  posi- 
tion. Strangely  enough,  the  animal's  penis  was  fully  erect. 
Two  major  bones,  a  leg  bone  and  the  pelvic  bone,  had  been 
broken  as  if  by  a  fall.  There  was  still  some  food  on  the  ani- 
mal's tongue,  and  between  his  teeth,  indicating  an  abrupt 
interruption  of  his  last  meal.  The  preliminary  conclusion  sug- 
gested by  these  facts  was  that  the  animal  met  his  death  by 
falling  into  the  river.  A  little  later  on  we  shall  re-examine 
this  conclusion. 

Very  special  interest  attached  to  the  analysis  of  the  contents 
of  this  animal's  stomach.  These  consisted  of  about  fifty 
pounds  of  material,  largely  undigested  and  remarkably  well 
preserved.  While  the  foregoing  data  were  obtained  from  a 
translation  of  parts  of  the  report  of  the  academicians,  pub- 
lished by  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  the  section  dealing 
with  the  stomach  contents  was  specially  translated  for  this 
work  by  my  aunt,  Mrs.  Norman  Hapgood.  Since  there  are 
many  interesting  points  essential  to  an  understanding  of  the 
question,  which  can  be  noted  only  by  a  reading  of  the  report 
itself,  and  which  do  not  figure  in  the  published  accounts,  I 


246  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

reproduce  the  stomach  analysis  by  V.  N.  Sukachev,  with 
omission  of  technical  botanical  terms  where  possible,  and 
with  omission  of  bibliographical  references  to  Russian,  Ger- 
man, and  Latin  sources,  and  some  shortening  of  the  com- 
ment (410). 

We  can  definitely  establish  the  following  types  of  plants  in  the 
food  in  the  stomach  and  among  the  teeth  of  the  Beresovka  mammoth 
[Latin  names  are  those  of  the  Russian  text]: 

a.  Alopecurus  alpinus  sin.    The  remains  of  this  grass  are  numerous 
in  the  contents  of  the  stomach.  A  significant  portion  of  it  consists  of 
stems,  with  occasional  remnants  of  leaves,  usually  mixed  in  with  other 
vegetable  remains.  ...  All  these  remains  are  so  little  destroyed  that 
one  is  able  to  establish  with  exactitude  to  what  species  they  be- 
long. .  .  . 

Measurements  of  the  individual  parts  of  these  plants,  when  com- 
pared with  the  varieties  of  the  existing  species,  showed  that  the 
variety  contained  in  the  food  was  more  closely  related  to  that  now 
found  in  the  forest  regions  to  the  south  of  the  tundra  than  to  the 
varieties  now  found  in  the  tundra.  Nevertheless,  this  is  an  Arctic 
variety  and  is  widely  spread  over  the  Arctic  regions,  in  North  America 
and  Eurasia.  However,  in  the  forested  regions  it  runs  far  to  the  south. 

b.  Beckmannia  eruciformis  (L.)  Host.    The  florets  of  this  plant  are 
numerous  in  the  contents  of  the  stomach  and  usually  are  excellently 
preserved.  [The  detailed  description  of  the  remains  (with  precise 
measurements  in  millimeters)  shows  the  species  to  be  the  same  as  that 
of  the  present  day,  although  a  little  smaller,  which  may  be  the  result  of 
compaction  in  the  stomach.  At  the  present  time  the  species  is  widely 
prevalent  in  Siberia  and  in  the  Arctic  generally.  It  grows  in  flooded 
meadows  or  marshes.  It  is  also  found  in  North  America,  the  south  of 
Europe,  and  a  major  part  of  European  Russia  (although  it  has  not 
been  reported  from  northern  Russia),  almost  all  of  Siberia,  Japan, 
North  China,  and  Mongolia.] 

c.  Agropyrum  cristatum  (L.)  Bess.     Remains  of  this  plant  are  very 
numerous  in  the  contents  of  the  stomach.  [They  are  so  well  preserved 
that  there  is  no  doubt  as  to  the  exact  species.  The  individual  speci- 
mens are  slightly  smaller  than  those  of  the  typical  more  southern 
variety  growing  today,  but  this  could  be  the  result  of  some  reduction 
of  size  because  of  pressure  in  the  stomach,  which  is  noted  in  other 
cases.] 

The  finding  of  these  plants  is  of  very  great  interest.  Not  only  are 
they  scarcely  known  anywhere  in  the  Arctic  regions,  they  are  even,  so 
far  as  I  have  been  able  to  discover,  very  rare  also  in  the  Yakutsk  dis- 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  247 

trict.  .  .  .  Generally  speaking  the  Agropyrum  cristatum  L.  Bess  is  a 
plant  of  the  plains  (steppes)  and  is  widespread  in  the  plains  of  Dauria. 
.  .  .  The  general  range  of  this  plant  includes  southern  Europe  (in 
European  Russia  it  is  adapted  to  the  plains  belt),  southern  Siberia, 
Turkestan,  Djungaria,  Tian-Shan,  and  Mongolia. 

Nevertheless,  the  variety  found  in  the  stomach  differs  slightly  from 
both  the  European  and  Oriental-Siberian  varieties  found  today. 

d.  Hordeum  violaceum  Boiss.  et  Huet.     [After  a  detailed  anatom- 
ical description  of  the  remains  of  this  plant  in  the  stomach  contents, 
the  writer  continues.]  Our  specimens  are  in  no  particular  different 
from  the  specimens  of  this  species  from  the  Yakutsk,  Irkutsk,  and 
Transbaikal  districts.   [The  plant  is,   apparently,  no  longer  found 
along  the  Lena  River,  except  south  of  its  junction  with  the  Aldan 
River.  It  is  found  in  dry,  grassy  areas.  It  is  not  found  in  the  Arctic 
regions.]  Its  northernmost  point  is  apparently  Turochansk.  .  .  .  Gen- 
erally speaking,  in  Siberia  this  plant  is  a  meadow  plant  and  is  also 
found  in  moister  places  in  the  plains. 

e.  Agrostis  sp.     ...  it  does  not  appear  possible  to  identify  the 
species  positively.  [Apparently,  no  plant  precisely  similar  is  known  at 
the  present  day.  Thus  it  may  represent  an  extinct  form.] 

f.  Gramina  gen.  et  sp.     A  grass,   but  preservation   is  not  good 
enough  to  allow  any  more  precise  identification. 

g.  Carex  lagopina  Wahlenb.     The  remains  of  this  sedge  are  numer- 
ous in  the  contents  of  the  stomach.  [The  specimens  exactly  resemble 
varieties  growing  today.  The  measurements  show  no  reduction  in 
size.  Its  range  extends  to  the  shores  of  the  Arctic  Ocean.  It  is  found 
in  mountainous  regions,  including  the  Carpathians,  Alps,  and  Pyre- 
nees. It  is  also  found  in  the  peat  bogs  of  western  Prussia,  in  Siberia 
as  far  south  as  Transbaikalia  and  Kamchatka,  in  eastern  India,  North 
America,  and  the  southern  island  of  New  Zealand.] 

h.  [Omitted— apparently  a  numbering  error  in  the  text.] 
i.  Ranunculus  acris  L.  [The  specimens  in  the  stomach  did  not 
permit  identification  of  the  precise  variety  of  this  buttercup,  though 
pods  equally  large  are  occasionally  found.]  The  general  range  of  this 
plant  is  very  great.  It  includes  all  Europe  and  Siberia,  it  stretches  to 
the  extreme  north,  spreads  to  China,  Japan,  Mongolia,  and  North 
America.  However,  over  this  area  this  species  very  much  deteriorates 
into  many  varieties  which  are  considered  by  some  to  be  independent 
species.  [This  plant  grows  in  rather  dry  places.  It  is  not  at  present 
found  growing  together  with  the  Beckmannia  Eruciformis,  although 
it  is  found  with  it  in  the  stomach.] 

j.  Oxytropis  sordida  (Willd)  Trantv.     In  the  contents  of  the  stom- 
ach were  found  several  fragments  of  these  beans.  ...  In  the  frag- 


248  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

ments  taken  from  the  teeth  there  were  found  eight  whole  bean  pods 
in  a  very  good  state  of  preservation;  they  even  in  places  retained  five 
beans.  .  .  .  [The  plant  is  now  found  in  Arctic  and  sub-Arctic  regions, 
but  also  in  the  northern  forests.  It  grows  in  rather  dry  places.] 

In  addition  to  the  nine  species  mentioned  above,  and  de- 
scribed in  the  report,  with  numerous  measurements,  the 
author  reports  that  two  kinds  of  mosses  were  identified  in 
the  stomach  contents  by  Professor  Broterus,  of  Finland. 
There  were  five  sprigs  of  Hypnum  fluitans  (Dill.)  L.  and  one 
sprig  of  Aulacomnium  turgidum  (Wahlenb.)  Schwaegr.  The 
first  is  common  in  Siberia  north  of  the  Gist  parallel  of  latitude 
and  to  the  marshlands  of  northern  Europe.  Both  of  them  "be- 
long to  species  widely  distributed  over  both  the  wooded  and 
the  tundra  regions." 

The  report  states,  further,  that  another  scientist,  F.  F.  Herz, 
brought  back  several  fragments  of  woody  substances  and  bark 
from  beneath  the  mammoth,  and  of  the  species  of  vegetation 
among  which  it  was  lying.  Very  surprisingly,  these  were 
found  to  differ  in  a  marked  degree  from  the  contents  of  the 
stomach.  A  larch  (Larix  sp.)  was  finally  identified,  but  the 
genus  only,  not  the  species. 

Another  tree  identified  in  a  general  way  was  Betula  Alba 
L.S.I.,  but  the  exact  species  could  not  be  determined.  The 
same  was  true  of  a  third  tree,  Alnus  sp.  "All  three  of  these 
kinds  grow  at  present  in  the  Kolyma  River  basin,  and  along 
the  Beresovka,  as  they  are  widespread  in  general  from  the 
northern  limits  of  the  wooded  belt  to  the  southern  plains." 

The  general  conclusions  reached  in  the  report  are  as 
follows. 

a.  The  remains  of  plants  in  the  mammoth's  mouth,  among 
its  teeth,  were  the  same  as  the  stomach  contents,  and  repre- 
sented food  the  mammoth  had  not  yet  swallowed  when  it  was 
killed. 

b.  The  food  consisted  preponderantly  of  grasses  and  sedge. 
"No  remains  at  all  of  conifers  were  found."  Therefore,  "one 
may  conclude  that  the  Beresovka  mammoth  did  not,  as  was 
previously  thought,  feed  mainly  on  coniferous  vegetation  but 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  24Q 

mainly  on  meadow  grasses."  Evidently  he  wandered  into 
low,  moist  places,  and  also  into  higher,  drier  places  such  as 
are  now  found  in  the  same  region. 

c.  "The  finding  of  the  wood  remains  under  the  mammoth, 
and  even  the  cliff  itself  where  the  mammoth  was  lying,  sug- 
gest that  he  was  not  feeding  in  the  place  where  he  died.  The 
majority  of  the  vegetation  in  his  food  did  not  grow  along 
cliffs  or  in  conjunction  with  species  of  trees." 

d.  The  discovery  of  the  ripe  fruits  of  sedges,  grasses,  and 
other  plants  suggests  that  "the  mammoth  died  during  the 
second  half  of  July  or  the  beginning  of  August." 

The  report  concludes  that  while  the  contents  of  the  stom- 
ach do  not  prove  that  the  climate  was  warmer  in  the  days  of 
the  mammoth  than  it  is  today,  neither  do  they  exclude  the 
possibility  that  it  was  warmer.  However,  the  climate  was,  in 
any  case,  not  much  warmer.  The  evidence  provides  no  clew 
to  the  cause  of  the  extinction  of  the  mammoths. 


6.  The  Interpretation  of  the  Report 

On  the  assumption  that  we  are  dealing  with  a  displacement 
of  the  earth's  crust  beginning  about  18,000  years  ago  and 
ending  about  8,000  years  ago,  possibly  punctuated  by  pauses 
and  renewals  of  movement,  and  by  massive  outbursts  of  vol- 
canism  that  accounted  for  the  repeated  readvances  of  the  ice 
in  North  America,  and  by  warm  phases  between  these  read- 
vances, when  the  temperatures  may  have  been  warmed  by 
the  increasing  percentage  of  carbon  dioxide  in  the  air,  we 
may  attempt  to  reconstruct  the  progression  of  events  in 
Siberia.  This  may  furnish  a  basis  for  the  interpretation  of  the 
report,  and  of  the  other  facts  about  the  mammoths  cited 
above. 

To  begin  with,  if  North  America  was  moving  gradually 
southward  during  this  period  (along  the  goth  meridian,  as 
we  assume),  then  East  Asia  was  moving  northward  along  the 
continuation  of  the  same  meridian,  and  it  moved  at  the  same 


250  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

rate,  to  the  same  distance,  with  the  same  pauses,  if  any.  The 
climate  would  be  growing  gradually  colder,  but  with  inter- 
ruptions, for  the  colder  and  warmer  phases  caused  in  North 
America  by  the  volcanic  dust  and  carbon  dioxide  (produced 
by  volcanic  eruptions)  would  be  universal;  they  would  affect 
the  whole  earth's  surface  in  the  same  direction  at  the  same 
time.  In  Siberia,  warm  phases  would  check  the  deterioration 
of  the  climate  temporarily,  while  in  North  America  the  cold 
phases  would  act  to  check  its  improvement.  The  total  change 
of  climate  in  Siberia  during  this  whole  period  would  be  very 
great.  Siberia  would,  at  the  beginning  of  the  movement,  have 
been  enjoying  a  warm  temperate  climate,  warmer  than  that 
of  New  York  at  the  present  time. 

During  the  whole  period,  changes  would  gradually  be  tak- 
ing place  in  the  flora  in  eastern  Siberia.  Plants  adapted  to 
wide  ranges  of  climate,  capable  of  surviving  in  the  increasing 
cold,  would  continue  to  grow  in  Siberia.  It  is  interesting  to 
note  in  the  foregoing  report  of  the  contents  of  the  mam- 
moth's stomach  that  every  single  plant  or  tree  associated 
with  the  time  of  the  mammoth's  death  has  a  range  extending 
considerably  to  the  south  of  that  latitude  today.  Plants  un- 
able to  survive  in  the  increasing  cold  would  retreat  toward 
the  south,  as  two  or  three  of  the  plants  found  in  the  stomach 
evidently  did.  Arctic  species  and  varieties  would  tend  to  in- 
vade the  region  as  the  climate  grew  colder.  The  contents  of 
the  mammoth's  stomach  would  simply  represent  the  mixture 
of  plants  growing  in  Siberia  during  the  particular  part  of  the 
period  in  which  he  lived.  We  learn  from  Runcorn  that  Soviet 
scientists  have  dated  a  mammoth  from  the  Taimir  Peninsula, 
considerably  to  the  westward  in  Siberia,  by  radiocarbon,  and 
have  found  it  to  be  about  12,300  years  old  (361).  This  means 
that  mammoths  survived  until  toward  the  end  of  the  crust 
movement.  The  mammoth  of  the  Beresovka  may  have  lived 
as  late  as  or  later  than  this,  when  the  climate  of  Siberia  had 
deteriorated  a  great  deal,  though  by  no  means  to  the  present 
level.  The  possibility  exists  that  if  we  could  find  a  mammoth 
that  had  died  during  the  earlier  phase  of  the  displacement 


THE     GREAT     EXTINCTIONS  251 

we  would  find  a  combination  of  plants  in  its  stomach  reflect- 
ing a  much  warmer  climate,  but,  of  course,  it  is  unlikely  that 
during  that  warmer  period  any  mammoths  would  have  been 
preserved. 

Just  as  we  assume  that  North  America  subsided  a  thousand 
feet  or  more  relatively  to  sea  level  when  the  continent  was 
being  moved  equatorward,  this  being  followed  by  a  later 
isostatic  rebound  of  the  crust,  so  we  must  logically  assume  a 
progressive  uplift  of  Siberia  during  its  poleward  displace- 
ment, with  subsidence  since. 

This  uplift  of  Siberia,  which  I  now  suggest,  is  vitally  im- 
portant for  the  clarification  of  the  facts  relating  to  the  mam- 
moths. If  we  assume  that,  previous  to  the  displacement,  the 
elevation  of  the  lands  in  eastern  Siberia  and  the  Arctic  was 
about  the  same  as  now,  we  can  see  in  this  moderate  uplift 
(which  is  a  necessary  corollary  of  crust  displacement)  suffi- 
cient added  elevation  to  connect  both  the  New  Siberian 
Islands  with  the  Asiatic  mainland,  and  Asia  with  North 
America  across  the  Behring  Strait.  Thus  the  migrations  of  the 
animals  to  the  New  Siberian  Islands  and  between  Alaska  and 
Siberia  are  explained,  without  having  to  have  recourse  to 
the  theory  of  a  sea  level  controlled  by  glacial  melt  water. 
Then,  the  subsidence  of  the  area  by  isostatic  adjustment  after 
the  end  of  the  displacement  (let  us  say,  between  10,000  and 
3,000  years  ago)  would  have  separated  America,  Asia,  and  the 
New  Siberian  Islands,  and  it  provides  us  with  a  clear  and 
sufficient  explanation  for  the  reported  dredging  up  of  mam- 
moths' tusks  from  the  bottom  of  the  Arctic  Ocean,  or  of  their 
being  thrown  up,  as  it  is  said,  upon  the  beaches  of  the  Arctic 
Ocean  during  Arctic  storms. 

The  progressive  elevation  of  Siberia  during  the  displace- 
ment provides  us,  finally,  with  a  very  complete  explanation 
of  the  many  curious,  enigmatic  circumstances  surrounding 
the  discovery  of  the  mammoths'  remains,  and  those  of  other 
animals.  But  before  these  problems  can  be  explained,  another 
circumstance  must  first  be  briefly  discussed. 

I  have  mentioned  that  volcanic  eruptions  would  be  having 


252  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

their  direct  and  indirect  effects  in  Asia  as  in  North  America, 
and,  indeed,  everywhere.  The  effect  o£  volcanic  dust,  as  we 
have  seen,  is  to  chill  the  atmosphere.  In  the  last  chapter  I 
presented  indirect  evidence  that  the  volcanism  during  the 
displacement  was  at  times  massive  enough  to  produce  major 
lowering  of  the  average  temperature,  and  continuous  enough 
to  keep  it  low  for  long  periods.  In  addition,  I  presented  di- 
rect evidence  that  many  volcanoes  were  active  during  the 
period  in  areas  that  are  now  quiet. 

I  can  form  no  idea  as  to  just  how  many  volcanoes  might 
have  been  active  simultaneously  at  any  time  during  that  dis- 
placement of  the  crust.  An  educated  guess  is  apparently  not 
possible.  I  will  assume,  however,  that  during  any  displace- 
ment the  average  quantity  of  volcanism  annually  would  be 
considerably  greater  than  at  present.  This  seems  a  safe  as- 
sumption. 

I  will  assume,  secondly,  that  at  intervals  during  the  10,000- 
year  period  of  the  displacement,  volcanism  would  reach  a 
higher  point  than  the  average  for  the  whole  period.  This  has 
already  been  suggested  (Chapter  VII).  Such  periods  would  be 
likely  to  occur  while  the  crust  was  moving  at  its  greatest  speed, 
that  is,  during  the  middle  part  of  the  period  (Chapter  XI). 
These  would  be  periods  of  readvance  of  the  dwindling  con- 
tinental icecap.  They  would  be  of  varying  length,  but  some 
of  them  would  last  a  long  time. 

My  third  supposition  will  be  that  occasionally,  during 
periods  of  very  active  volcanism,  there  would  occur  a  con- 
junction of  several  major  volcanic  explosions  in  the  same 
year.  The  mathematical  probabilities  would  favor  this  oc- 
currence. It  would  be  strange  indeed,  considering  the  stresses 
and  strains  to  which  the  crust  of  the  earth  would  be  sub- 
jected during  its  displacement,  if  this  did  not  happen  now 
and  then. 

Let  us  now  look  at  the  consequences  of  this.  Let  us  sup- 
pose five  explosions  in  one  year  of  the  magnitude  of  the 
explosion  of  Mt.  Katmai  (or  a  larger  number  of  lesser  ex- 
plosions). According  to  Humphreys,  this  would  produce 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  253 

enough  dust  to  intercept  100  per  cent  of  the  sun's  radiation; 
consequently,  the  earth's  surface  would  receive  no  heat  at  all. 
It  seems  very  unlikely  that  things  could  ever  have  gone  quite 
as  far  as  this;  nevertheless,  considering  that  volcanic  dust  is 
circulated  around  the  world  in  a  matter  of  days,  and  that  the 
refrigerating  effects  on  the  atmosphere  may  be  felt  in  a 
matter  of  weeks  or  months,  there  exists  the  possibility  of  a 
sudden  and  drastic  fall  in  temperature  following  soon  after 
such  a  conjunction  of  volcanic  explosions. 

The  direct  effects  of  this  sudden  fall  in  temperature  on 
animals  would  be  serious  enough,  but  the  indirect  effects 
concern  us  more,  for  the  moment.  The  amount  of  humidity 
the  atmosphere  can  hold  is  proportional  to  temperature.  If 
a  mass  of  air  is  heated,  it  will  pick  up  more  moisture.  If  it  is 
cooled  drastically,  the  precipitation  will  be  drastic,  in  the 
form  of  either  rain  or  snow.  At  the  same  time,  precipitation 
will  be  increased  by  an  increase  in  the  number  of  dust  par- 
ticles in  the  air,  because  raindrops  require  dust  particles  to 
condense  around,  or  so  it  is  thought.  Our  situation,  after  a 
massive  outburst  of  volcanism  in  a  short  period,  would  be 
that  while  the  air  was  being  drastically  cooled,  there  would 
at  the  same  time  be  an  enormous  increase  of  the  convenient 
dust  particles.  This  could  add  up  to  precipitation  of  moisture 
on  an  enormous  scale. 

Now  let  us  return  to  Siberia.  Let  us  suppose  that  the 
region  is  being  steadily  moved  northward,  and  that  its  eleva- 
tion above  sea  level  is  increasing.  In  a  certain  year,  a  conjunc- 
tion of  several  major  volcanic  eruptions  takes  place.  Let  us 
come  back  to  our  Beresovka  mammoth.  He  is  feeding  quietly 
in  the  grassy  meadow,  and  he  has  just  swallowed  a  mouthful 
of  buttercups,  and  has  gathered  up,  with  his  trunk,  a  new 
mouthful  of  wild  beans,  The  temperature  is  warm,  and 
there  is  no  sign  of  what  is  about  to  occur.  The  volcanoes  have 
shot  off  their  dust  some  time  before.  Cold  air*  currents  are 
circulating  ominously,  but  unperceived,  not  far  away. 

I  have  seen  a  situation  like  this  in  Canada,  during  Indian 
summer.  Day  after  day  the  sun  is  warm,  although  the  nights 


254  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

are  cold.  The  forest  still  has  a  summer  look.  It  is  still  possible 
to  swim  in  the  lake,  and  then  come  out  and  stretch  in  the  sun 
to  get  dry  and  warm.  But  suddenly,  without  transition,  in 
the  course  of  a  few  hours,  the  northwest  wind  brings  winter. 
The  lake  freezes  up,  and  the  very  next  day,  as  far  as  the  eye 
can  see,  there  is  nothing  but  ice  and  snow. 

Things  moved  faster,  or  at  least  more  drastically,  in  the 
grassy  meadow.  The  storm  came  down  early  in  August,  per- 
haps first  with  rain,  and  terrific  wind.  Humphreys  has 
pointed  out  that  the  effect  of  a  large  quantity  of  volcanic 
dust  in  the  atmosphere  must  be  to  increase  the  temperature 
gradient  between  the  poles  and  the  equator,  resulting  in 
more  rapid  circulation  of  the  air,  in  winds  of  greater  velocity. 
I  shall  present  additional  evidence  of  this  in  the  following 
pages.  Since  winds  occasionally  attain  a  velocity  of  150  miles 
an  hour  or  more  even  today,  we  may  conservatively  suppose 
that  the  storm  could  have  hit  the  grassy  meadow  at  that 
speed.  At  the  beginning  of  the  disturbance,  the  mammoth 
would  have  stopped  eating—without  even  bothering  to  swal- 
low the  last  few  beans  in  his  mouth.  He  would  have  left  the 
meadow  and,  accompanied  by  his  friends,  sought  shelter  in 
the  nearest  forest,  as,  no  doubt,  he  had  often  done  before 
during  storms.  Here,  in  the  confusion  of  the  storm,  perhaps 
because  of  the  force  of  the  wind  itself,  he  may  have  fallen 
over  the  cliff  at  the  bottom  of  which  his  body  was  found.  He 
was  not  killed,  but  a  leg  bone  and  his  pelvic  bone  were 
broken.  He  couldn't  walk,  so  he  lay  there,  while  the  wild 
hurricane  in  a  very  few  hours  brought  down  subzero  air 
masses  from  the  polar  zone,  and  the  rain  turned  to  snow,  and 
piled  up  around  him.  He  lifted  the  fore  part  of  his  body  as 
far  as  he  could  above  the  snow,  but  it  piled  up,  in  the  lee  of 
the  cliff  over  which  he  had  fallen,  until  it  was  above  his  head. 
By  this  time,  however,  he  might  already  have  frozen  to  death 
in  his  half-standing  posture.  A  similar  fate  would  have  en- 
gulfed millions  of  animals.  During  the  ensuing  months  of 
winter  the  snow  mantle  would  still  thicken,  and  during  the 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  255 

following  summer,  because  of  the  continuing  effects  of  the 
volcanic  dust,  it  would  scarcely  melt  at  all. 

At  this  point  many  animals  have  been  frozen  into  the 
snowdrifts;  moreover,  except  for  some  that  may  have  been 
dismembered  by  the  force  of  the  wind,  they  are  intact.  They 
are  frozen  in  the  ice  of  a  nascent  icecap.  Since  the  region 
moves  ever  northward,  the  ice  cover  tends  to  remain  over 
most  of  the  area;  it  does  not  quite  melt  away  during  the 
summers,  and  it  gets  thicker  and  thicker  as  Siberia  ap- 
proaches the  pole. 

But  here  some  impatient  reader  with  some  geological 
knowledge  will  break  in  and  say,  "But  there  was  no  icecap 
in  Siberia! "  Quite  so:  no  continental  icecap  finally  devel- 
oped; the  icecap  that  began  to  grow  never  came  to  maturity. 
Instead,  it  melted  away. 

One  need  not  look  far  for  the  explanation  of  this.  We  have 
noted  that  the  region  was  uplifted  during  the  displacement. 
In  the  earlier  stages,  while  the  climate  was  still  warm,  the 
uplift  had  been  sufficient  to  open  land  communications  with 
the  New  Siberian  Islands  and  Alaska.  In  climate,  a  slight  in- 
crease of  elevation  may  be  the  equivalent  of  hundreds  of 
miles  of  latitude.  So,  after  a  movement  of  the  crust  had  pro- 
gressed to  a  certain  distance,  and  the  resulting  increased 
elevation  of  the  land  had  brought  lowered  temperatures,  a 
thin  icecap  stretched  over  northern  Siberia. 

But  when,  after  the  end  of  the  displacement,  isostatic  ad- 
justment began  to  correct  the  elevation,  and  to  bring  the 
area  down,  it  also  warmed  the  climate,  and  so  the  nascent 
icecap  melted  away,  and  no  doubt  this  development  was 
furthered  by  the  Climatic  Optimum.  During  this  warm  pe- 
riod, the  ice  sheet  in  Siberia  may  have  melted  very  rapidly, 
and  torrents  of  melt  water  may  have  borne  the  bodies  of 
the  animals  along,  after  they  were  disengaged  from  the  ice, 
and  torn  their  bodies  apart,  and  heaped  them  up  in  great 
numbers  as  we  find  them,  and  buried  them  in  vast  seas  of 
freezing  mud.  In  most  cases,  of  course,  only  the  bones  re- 
mained. Brooks  cites  a  statement  by  Flint  and  Dorsey  (160: 


256  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

627)  giving  evidence  of  a  recent  "thin  and  inactive"  ice 
sheet  in  Siberia,  exactly  as  the  hypothesis  demands. 

It  might  frequently  occur  that  an  animal  would  escape 
being  washed  out  of  the  melting  icecap.  It  would  seem  that 
the  Beresovka  mammoth  was  one  of  these.  He  seems  to  have 
remained  frozen  in  the  attitude  of  his  last  struggle  in  the 
snowdrift.  In  a  succession  of  thaws,  however,  the  ice  encasing 
his  body  was  apparently  washed  away  and  replaced  by  freez- 
ing mud.  The  temperature  of  the  carcass  may  have  ap- 
proached the  melting  point  at  these  times,  but  though  this 
would  have  destroyed  the  edibility  of  the  meat,  it  would  not 
have  disintegrated  the  body.  It  would  even  have  been  pos- 
sible for  the  outside  of  the  body  to  have  thawed  briefly 
during  its  translation  from  the  icecap  to  the  permafrost  with 
little  or  no  decay,  because  of  the  absence  of  germs  in  the 
Arctic  climate.  It  would  seem  that  the  Academicians  who 
examined  the  mammoth  in  situ  were  not  impressed  with 
his  edibility;  they  did  not  try  any  mammoth  steaks. 

It  appears  that  this  assumption  of  a  thin,  temporary  ice- 
cap in  Siberia  gradually  transformed  into  permafrost  solves 
most  of  the  outstanding  questions  about  the  mammoths  and 
the  other  animals  whose  remains  are  found  in  Siberia.  It  ex- 
plains, for  example,  why  some  of  the  mammoths  have  been 
found  on  the  highest  points  of  the  tundra.  It  explains  the 
configuration  of  the  deposits  in  which  they  are  found.  It 
explains  Tolmachev's  remark  that  "mammoth-bearing  drift 
deposits  sometimes  have  a  thickness  of  tens  of  feet,  sometimes 
they  are  spread  out  in  comparatively  thin  layers"  (422:51). 
The  "drift  deposits"  are  water-formed;  they  can  now  be  ex- 
plained as  the  result  of  the  melting  of  the  thin  icecap,  which 
must  have  produced  rapidly  flowing  rivers  that  picked  up 
and  deposited  quantities  of  mud,  thicker  in  some  places  than 
in  others,  and  filled  with  bodies  and  parts  of  bodies  dropped 
out  of  the  icecap.  The  prompt  refreezing  of  these  seas  of 
mud,  after  the  thaw,  created  the  permafrost. 

But  even  if  these  assumptions  seem  to  solve  the  problems, 
the  reader  may  still  say,  "Well—very  good.  But  what  if  all 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  257 

this  isn't  true  after  all?"  All  I  can  then  do  is  to  point  to 
some  tangible  evidence  that  exactly  this  sort  of  thing  hap- 
pened in  another  part  of  the  earth.  But  to  examine  this  evi- 
dence we  must  turn  aside  into  one  of  the  byways  of  science, 
and  examine  an  unsuspected  facet  of  the  Wisconsin  glacia- 
tion.  We  must  return  to  North  America,  and  reconstruct  the 
story  of  the  birth  of  that  icecap. 


7.  The  Mastodons  of  New  York 

About  seventy-five  years  ago,  considerable  excitement  was 
aroused  in  scientific  and  popular  circles  by  the  discovery  of 
the  remains  of  extinct  animals  in  various  parts  of  the  United 
States.  Perhaps  the  most  sensational  of  these  finds  was  that 
of  the  mastodons.  Many  of  these  were  found  in  New  York 
State,  and  in  some  cases  they  were  so  well  preserved  that  it 
was  still  possible  to  analyze  the  contents  of  the  animals' 
stomachs.  Some  extensive  accounts  of  these  mastodons  have 
appeared  in  print  (178,  309,  203).  Since  science,  like  clothing, 
has  its  fashions,  a  period  of  attention  to  the  mastodons  was 
followed  by  a  period  of  neglect.  Neglect  did  not  overtake 
them,  however,  before  conclusions  were  reached  respecting 
them.  It  was  noted  that  nearly  all  the  best-preserved  remains 
were  found  in  bogs  and  swamps,  where,  it  was  assumed,  they 
had  been  mired  and  sucked  down  to  their  deaths. 

This  explanation  of  their  deaths  was  accepted,  apparently 
without  any  dissent,  and  it  involved,  of  course,  the  acceptance 
also  of  the  opinion  that  the  animals  had  inhabited  New  York 
State  after  the  departure  of  the  ice  sheet.  It  was  concluded 
that  the  animals  were  postglacial.  The  conclusion  was  inevi- 
table, because  the  ice  sheet  would  have  plowed  up  all  bogs, 
and  the  animals'  bodies  could  not  have  been  preserved  from 
destruction  by  it. 

So  the  matter  rested— the  mastodons  ceased  to  attract  at- 
tention. There  followed  a  period  during  which  the  general 
trend  of  scientific  opinion  led  finally  to  the  view  that  neither 


258  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

mammoths  nor  mastodons,  nor  any  of  the  other  extinct  Pleis- 
tocene animals,  had  lived  in  North  America  after  the  ice  age. 
But  no  one  has  gone  back  to  dig  up  the  evidence  of  the  mas- 
todons and  ask  how,  if  they  did  not  live  in  New  York  State 
after  the  ice  age,  they  came  to  be  buried  in  the  bogs  where 
they  are  found.  It  is  now  our  task  to  reopen  this  closed  chap- 
ter, to  drag  these  ancient  beasts  once  more  from  their  tomb. 
We  shall  first  look  at  some  of  their  case  histories,  and  then 
summarize  our  findings. 

One  might  imagine  two  alternative  solutions  of  the  prob- 
lem. Either  the  mastodons  lived  in  New  York  State  after  the 
ice  age,  and  got  themselves  mired  in  the  bogs  where  their 
bodies  are  found,  or  they  got  mired  in  the  bogs  before  the  ice 
age,  and  somehow  escaped  destruction  by  the  passage  over 
them  of  the  mile-thick  ice  sheet.  In  the  latter  case,  the  ani- 
mals would  have  been  found  in  beds  of  swampy  vegetable 
stuff  below  the  sand,  gravel,  and  striated  stones  deposited  by 
the  glacier.  How,  then,  are  we  to  explain  the  fact  that  the 
animal  remains  are  not  found  in  this  layer  but  are  mixed 
up  with  the  glacial  materials  themselves?  Since  this  is  usually 
true,  we  are  driven  to  the  conclusion  that  the  animals  were 
mired  in  New  York  State  bogs  neither  before  nor  after  the 
coming  of  the  ice  sheet.  Before  pressing  on  to  further  con- 
clusions, let  us  consider  the  details  of  a  few  cases. 

In  August,  1871,  a  mastodon  was  discovered  one  mile 
north  of  Jamestown,  New  York,  and  the  remains  were  ex- 
amined in  situ  by  Professor  S.  G.  Love  and  others.  Love  de- 
scribed the  find  as  follows: 

On  the  east  side  of  the  Fredonia  road,  about  one  mile  north  of 
Jamestown,  is  the  farm  of  Joel  L.  Hoyt.  About  500  yards  from  the 
road  is  a  sink  or  slough  covering  about  an  acre,  possibly  more  in  ex- 
tent, and  varying  from  two  to  eight  feet  in  depth,  and  fed  by  several 
living  springs.  Cattle  have  been  mired  and  lost  there  since  the  farm 
was  first  occupied.  Mr.  Hoyt  drained  the  sink  and  left  the  muck  to 
dry,  and  later  commenced  an  excavation  there.  The  work  of  excava- 
tion had  continued  a  little  more  than  a  week,  when  the  workmen 
began  to  find  (as  they  supposed)  a  peculiar  kind  of  wood  and  roots, 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  259 

imbedded  some  six  feet  beneath  the  surface.  For  several  days  they 
continued  to  carry  the  small  pieces  into  an  adjoining  field  with  the 
muck,  and  to  pile  the  larger  ones  with  pine  roots  and  stumps  to  be 
burned.  But  Mr.  Hoyt  discovered  unmistakable  evidences  of  the  re- 
mains of  some  huge  animal.  At  once  there  was  a  change  in  the  pro- 
cedure, in  order  to  secure  specimens  and  determine  their  character. 
It  was  difficult  to  determine  the  precise  position  of  the  remains,  as 
they  were  much  disturbed  and  partially  removed  before  any  special 
notice  was  taken  of  them.  From  the  best  information  I  could  get,  I 
conclude  that  the  body  lay  with  the  head  to  the  east,  from  four  to  six 
feet  beneath  the  surface,  and  in  a  partially  natural  position.  Many 
of  the  bones  were,  however,  out  of  place.  The  lower  jaw  was  about 
five  feet  from  the  head  and  lay  on  the  side  crushed  together  so  that 
the  rows  of  teeth  were  very  near  each  other.  The  tusks  extended 
easterly  in  nearly  a  natural  position,  and,  judging  from  the  statements 
of  Mr.  Hoyt  and  the  workmen,  they  must  have  been  from  ten  to 
twelve  feet  in  length.  After  digging  into  the  gravel  and  clay  about 
ten  inches  I  found  traces  of  a  rib,  decayed  but  distinctly  marked, 
over  five  feet  in  length.  Where  the  body  must  have  lain  were  found 
large  quantities  of  vegetable  matter  (evidently  the  contents  of  the 
stomach)  mostly  decayed,  in  which  were  innumerable  small  twigs 
varying  from  one  half  inch  to  two  inches  in  length.  The  remains  were 
all  in  a  very  forward  state  of  decay;  and  when  I  reached  the  ground 
I  found  it  possible  to  do  little  more  than  had  already  been  done  to 
preserve  them.  .  .  .  (203:14-15).  [There  follows  a  list  of  individual 
parts  found.] 

Here  an  important  point  is  the  fact  that  parts  of  the  re- 
mains were  found  mixed  with  the  sand  and  gravel,  which 
had  been  deposited  by  the  ice  sheet  as  it  retreated.  This  fact 
suggests  that  the  carcass  may  have  been  dropped  or  washed 
out  of  the  icecap  into  a  glacial  pool,  which  later  through  a 
process  of  countless  freezings  and  thawings  and  accumula- 
tion of  sediments  became  a  bog.  Later  Professor  Love  am- 
plified the  foregoing  remarks  in  a  very  interesting  manner, 
in  a  paper  read  before  the  Chautauqua  Society  of  History 
and  Natural  Science,  July  16,  1885: 

The  twigs  found  in  such  large  quantities  where  the  stomach  would 
naturally  be  were  found,  upon  microscopical  examination  and  com- 
parison, to  be  of  the  same  kind  (genera  and  species)  as  the  cone  bear- 
ing trees  (pine  and  spruce)  of  the  present  day.  Mingled  with  the  twigs 


260  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

was  a  mass  of  yellowish  fetid  matter,  probably  the  remains  of  some 
vegetation  which  did  not  possess  the  staying  qualities  of  the  balsamic 
cone-bearers  (203:15-16). 

Several  important  points  are  illustrated  in  these  passages. 
They  are  all  brought  out,  as  well,  in  numerous  other  cases. 
The  more  significant  points  appear  to  be: 

a.  The  rib  was  found  buried  in  the  glacial  material  under 
the  muck,  as  already  mentioned. 

b.  Some  force  crushed  the  jaw  and  separated  other  parts  of 
the  body,  without  completely  disturbing  its  natural  position. 
We  shall  find  many  cases  of  this  sort  of  thing. 

c.  The  stomach  was  found  to  contain  evidence  of  vegeta- 
tion such  as  now  grows  in  New  York  State.  Since  the  animal 
did  not  live  after  glacial  times,  and  since  the  vegetation 
naturally  did  not  exist  in  New  York  State  when  it  was  cov- 
ered by  a  mile  of  ice,  it  follows  that  the  animal  lived  in  the 
last  Interglacial  Period,  and  that  New  York  then  had  a  cli- 
mate something  like  the  present. 

d.  The  discovery  of  the  remains  in  a  mire  tells  us  nothing 
of  the  mode  of  death,  because  only  in  a  mire  would  they 
have  had  any  chance  of  being  preserved.  Animals  dying  in 
other  situations,  or  left  in  dry  places  by  the  retreating  ice, 
would  have  disintegrated  completely. 

e.  The  evidence  favors  the  conclusion  that  the  body  of 
the  mastodon  was  preserved  within  the  vast  ice  sheet  itself, 
and  was  deposited  when  the  ice  withdrew,  in  a  bog  where 
conditions  continued  to  favor  its  preservation.  The  power  of 
bogs  to  preserve  animal  and  vegetable  matter  for  long  pe- 
riods is  well  known. 

The  instances  cited  by  Hartnagel  and  Bishop  of  mastodons 
that  clearly  were  not  mired  in  bogs  include  one  mastodon 
whose  remains,  a  tusk,  were  found  in  sand  near  Fairport; 
another  whose  tusk  and  teeth  were  found  in  sand  and  gravel 
in  the  town  of  Perrinton;  one  whose  remains  (ribs,  skull, 
tusk,  leg  bone)  were  found  "about  four  feet  below  the  sur- 
face in  a  hollow  or  water  course,  lying  on  and  in  a  very  hard 
body  of  blue  clay,  and  about  two  feet  above  the  polished 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  g6l 

limestone  .  .  .";  "a  rib  of  a  mammoth  or  mastodon  found 
12  feet  below  the  surface  of  the  ground  in  gravel"  at  Roches- 
ter, and  other  instances  (203:35-39). 

Dr.  Roy  L.  Moodie,  of  the  New  York  State  Museum,  in 
his  Popular  Guide  to  the  Nature  and  the  Environment  of  the 
Fossil  Vertebrates  of  New  York,  discusses  a  mastodon  that 
was  deposited  entire  in  a  glacial  pothole: 

.  .  .  The  pothole  was  made  by  whirling  waters  grinding  the  loose 
stones  in  a  depression,  gradually  deepening  in  the  post-glacial  Mo- 
hawk River,  and  the  body  of  the  mammoth  carne  down  with  the  ice 
and  dropped  into  the  hole.  .  .  .  (309:103-05). 

This  particular  case  provides  an  excellent  illustration  of  the 
process  by  which  so  many  of  the  animal  bodies  were  torn 
apart,  not  only  in  New  York  State  but  also  probably  in  Si- 
beria, where  the  melting  of  a  thinner  ice  sheet  would  still 
have  produced  torrents  in  which  the  bodies  detached  from 
the  ice  could  be  dashed  against  rocks  and  broken  to  pieces. 
Hartnagel  and  Bishop,  referring  to  the  few  remains  of 
mammoths  that  have  been  found  in  New  York  State,  remark: 

There  is  no  doubt  that  the  mammoth  remains  were  imbedded  in 
the  sand  and  gravels  laid  down  during  the  recession  of  the  ice  sheet. 
Examples  of  these  are  best  seen  in  the  Lewiston  specimens  of  teeth 
and  bones  which  were  found  deeply  buried  in  the  spit  formed  in  Lake 
Iroquois.  .  .  .  (203:67). 

Sir  Charles  Lyell  visited  the  site  of  the  discovery  of  a  mas- 
todon near  Geneseo,  Livingston  County,  New  York,  and 
described  his  observations  in  his  Travels  in  North  America^ 
in  a  passage  quoted  by  Hartnagel  and  Bishop: 

I  was  desirous  of  knowing  whether  any  shells  accompanied  the 
bones,  and  whether  they  were  of  recent  species.  Mr.  Hall  and  I  there- 
fore procured  workmen,  who  were  soon  joined  by  some  amateurs  o£ 
Geneseo,  and  a  pit  was  dug  to  a  depth  of  about  five  feet  from  the 
surface.  Here  we  came  upon  a  bed  of  white  shell  marl  and  sand,  in 
which  lay  portions  of  the  skull,  ivory  tusk  and  vertebrae,  of  the  ex- 
tinct quadruped.  The  shells  proved  to  be  all  of  existing  freshwater 
and  land  species  now  common  to  this  district.  I  had  been  told  that 
the  mastodon's  teeth  were  taken  out  of  muck,  or  the  black  superficial 


262  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

peaty  earth  of  the  bog.  I  was  therefore  glad  to  ascertain  that  it  was 
really  buried  in  the  shell-marl  below  the  peat,  and  therefore  agreed 
in  situation  with  the  large  fossil  elks  of  Ireland,  which,  though  often 
said  to  occur  in  peat,  are  in  fact  met  with  in  subjacent  beds  of  marl 
(203:31-32). 

Let  us,  in  passing,  note  in  this  passage  the  evidence  that 
whatever  occurred  in  Siberia  and  in  North  America  (though 
perhaps  at  different  times)  seems  also  to  have  occurred  in 
Ireland. 

If  it  is  now  clear  that  the  mastodons  were  actually  con- 
tained in  the  great  continental  glacier,  a  question  may  arise 
as  to  their  probable  numbers.  Were  these  animals  rare  or  did 
they  exist  in  great  herds?  Hartnagel  and  Bishop  quote  an 
earlier  writer,  who  remarked: 

...  I  have  been  particular  in  stating  the  relative  situations  and 
distances  of  those  places  in  which  bones  have  been  discovered,  from 
a  certain  point,  to  show,  from  the  small  district  in  which  many  dis- 
coveries have  been  made,  the  great  probability  that  these  animals 
must  have  been  very  numerous  in  this  part  of  the  country,  for  if  we 
compare  the  small  proportion  that  swamps,  in  which  only  they  are 
found,  bear  to  the  rest  of  the  surface,  and  the  very  small  proportion 
that  those  parts  of  such  swamps  as  have  yet  been  explored,  bear  to 
the  whole  of  such  swamps,  the  probable  conclusion  is  that  they  must 
once  have  existed  here  in  great  numbers  (203:62). 

It  must  not  be  supposed  that  only  mastodons  and  some 
mammoths  were  thus  caught  in  the  ice  sheet  and  deposited 
as  it  retreated.  Hartnagel  and  Bishop  give  instances  of  the 
finding  of  remains  of  foxes,  horses,  large  bears,  black  bears, 
giant  beaver,  small  beaver,  peccaries,  deer,  elk,  caribou, 
moose,  and  bison,  forming  a  mixture  of  extinct  and  still 
living  species,  all  deposited  in  the  same  way  (203:81-94). 
Moreover,  discoveries  were  not  confined  to  New  York  State, 
but  embraced  the  entire  area  once  covered  by  the  great  ice 
sheet 

We  must  therefore  conclude  that  in  all  probability  some 
millions  of  all  these  sorts  of  animals  were  enclosed  in  the  ice 
sheet.  Now  the  question  must  be  asked,  Did  they  live  in  the 
regions  where  they  are  now  found,  or  were  they  carried 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  263 

greater  or  lesser  distances  by  the  moving  ice?  This  is  an  im- 
portant question.  Glaciers  often  carry  vast  quantities  of  de- 
bris, even  huge  boulders,  hundreds  of  miles,  even  in  some 
cases  uphill  (63:14-15).  Hartnagel  and  Bishop  give  an  ex- 
cellent description  of  the  way  in  which  a  great  ice  sheet 
moves,  and  provide  a  partial  answer  to  the  question,  in  the 
following  passage: 

The  remains  of  most  of  the  Canadian  animals  that  were  over- 
whelmed in  and  by  the  glacial  snows  were  incorporated  in  the  lower, 
or  ground-contact  ice  of  the  southward  moving  sector  of  the  Quebec 
(Labradorian)  ice  cap.  The  deepest  portion  of  the  ice  cap  was  pushed 
into  the  deep  Ontarian  valley  and  becoming  stagnant  because  of  its 
position  and  also  because  of  its  load  of  detritus,  it  served  during  all 
the  duration  of  the  Quebec  glacier  as  a  bridge  over  which  the  upper 
ice,  by  a  shearing  flow,  passed  on  south  over  New  York.  This  element 
of  glacier  mechanics  is  fundamental  to  the  present  explanation  of  the 
peculiar  distribution  of  the  Elephas  remains  and  is  believed  to  de- 
scribe the  behavior  of  the  continental  glacier  toward  deep  and 
capacious  valleys,  not  only  those  transverse  to  the  ice  flow  but  also 
longitudinal  valleys.  .  .  .  (203:69). 

This  statement  should  be  supplemented  by  Coleman's  re- 
mark that  a  great  continental  icecap,  independently  of  any 
valleys,  moves  only  in  its  upper  layers,  except  at  the  edges. 
The  layers  near  the  ground  are  stagnant.  This  is  the  reason, 
he  says,  that  the  evidences  of  glaciation  are  found  mostly  on 
the  exterior  fringes  of  the  area  once  occupied  by  the  ice 
sheet.  The  central  areas  escape  the  grinding  and  plowing 
up  that  leave  such  evidences  in  the  latter  areas. 

The  usual  explanation  of  this  remarkable  fact  leaves  some- 
thing to  be  desired.  According  to  the  accepted  concept,  an 
ice  sheet  forms  first  in  a  small  area,  and  then  spreads  out, 
presumably  after  it  has  become  thick  enough  to  move  out- 
ward by  the  force  of  gravity.  That  means,  it  seems  to  me, 
that  all  but  a  small  central  area  should  show  signs  of  having 
been  passed  over  by  the  glacier.  Yet,  according  to  Coleman, 
the  opposite  is  the  case. 

I  think  our  assumption  provides  a  good  answer  to  this 
problem,  for  the  initial  snows,  such  as  we  assume  may  have 


264  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

occurred  in  Siberia  as  the  result  of  dust  produced  by  massive 
outbreaks  of  volcanism,  would  cover  a  considerable  area, 
enclosing  the  animal  remains.  Later,  if  the  ice  sheet  de- 
veloped enough  to  move  by  gravity,  the  upper  layers  would 
move,  leaving  a  stagnant  layer,  at  least  in  some  places,  to  pro- 
tect the  animals,  and  only  at  the  remote  fringe  or  at  high 
points  of  the  area  would  the  now  moving  icecap  containing 
its  load  of  rocks  and  pebbles  be  continuously  in  contact  with 
the  ground.  In  Siberia  the  icecap,  if  there  was  one,  never 
grew  thick  enough  to  move  by  gravity.  In  North  America, 
on  the  other  hand  (at  an  earlier  time),  the  icecap  did  grow, 
until  it  began  to  move. 

So  we  may  conclude  that  the  animals  contained  in  the 
great  North  American  icecap  were  mostly  living,  at  the  time 
they  were  overwhelmed  by  the  snow,  in  the  places  where 
they  are  now  found.  It  would  not  be  wise,  of  course,  to  ex- 
clude entirely  the  transportation  of  animal  remains  in  the 
ice  sheet;  very  certainly  it  occurred,  and  perhaps  quite  often, 
but  in  all  probability  the  vast  majority  of  the  animals  were 
in  the  stagnant  ground-contact  ice.  We  have  seen  that  the 
animals  represented  in  the  collection  in  the  glacier  indicate 
a  temperate  climate,  like  that  prevailing  in  New  York  State 
today.  Now  the  final  question  is,  How  did  these  millions  of 
animals,  living  in  a  temperate  zone,  get  caught  in  the  ice 
sheet? 

Note  that  here  there  is  no  dispute  about  the  climate  at 
the  time  the  animals  were  living.  Here  the  situation  is  free 
from  the  uncertainty  surrounding  the  exact  climate  in  which 
the  Beresovka  mammoth  lived.  The  animals  listed  above  are 
sufficient  in  themselves  to  establish  the  fact  of  a  temperate 
climate;  however,  there  is  an  additional  piece  of  evidence, 
in  the  form  of  a  quite  fascinating  botanical  analysis  of  the 
contents  of  a  mastodon's  stomach.  Hartnagel  and  Bishop 
quote  from  a  report  by  Dr.  J.  C.  Hunt: 

The  remains,  both  of  cryptogams  and  flowering  species,  were  in 
abundance.  Stems  and  leaves  of  mosses  were  wonderfully  distinct  in 
structure,  so  much  so  that  I  could  draw  every  cell.  I  even  readily  de- 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  265 

tected  confervoid  filaments,  with  cells  arranged  in  linear  series,  re- 
sembling species  now  found  in  our  waters.  Numerous  black  bodies, 
probably  spores  of  the  mosses,  were  found  in  abundance.  Not  a  frag- 
ment of  sphagnum  was  seen  in  the  deposit.  I  found,  however,  one 
fragment  of  a  water  plant,  possibly  a  rush,  an  inch  long,  every  cell 
of  which  was  as  distinct  as  though  growing  but  yesterday.  Pieces  of 
the  woody  tissue  and  bark  of  herbaceous  plants,  spiral  vessels,  etc., 
were  abundant.  Carapaces  of  Entomostraca  were  present,  but  no  trace 
of  coniferous  plants  could  be  detected.  It  hence  appears  that  the 
animal  ate  his  last  meal  from  the  tender  mosses  and  boughs  of  flower- 
ing plants  growing  on  the  banks  of  the  streams  and  margins  of  the 
swamps,  rather  than  fed  on  submerged  plants;  and  it  is  probable, 
moreover,  that  the  pines  and  cedars,  and  their  allies,  formed  no  part 
of  the  mastodon's  diet  (203:58). 

Here  we  see  that  everything  indicates  a  climate  similar  to 
that  of  New  York  today.  An  interesting  point  is  the  differ- 
ence between  the  mastodon's  diet  indicated  here  and  that 
indicated  in  the  case  mentioned  earlier.  Speculation  suggests 
that  perhaps  the  diet  in  this  second  case  indicates  the  ani- 
mal's preferred  diet,  or  perhaps  merely  the  diet  available  in 
the  summer,  while  that  in  the  earlier  case,  in  which  twigs 
were  so  important,  may  represent  either  the  winter  diet  of 
the  mastodon  or  an  emergency  diet,  the  result  of  the  de- 
struction of  the  normal  diet  by  the  events  occurring  just  be- 
fore the  animal's  death.  In  any  case,  the  second  diet  indicates 
that  whatever  happened  to  that  mastodon  certainly  took 
place  in  the  summer. 

Now  it  is  obvious  that  the  arguments  used  to  explain  away 
the  evidence  of  climatic  change  in  Siberia  won't  work  in  New 
York.  Here  there  was  certainly  climatic  change,  with  a  venge- 
ance. The  explanation  I  have  offered  for  the  preservation 
of  the  Siberian  remains  will  cover  both  cases.  The  great  dif- 
ference between  them,  aside  from  the  failure  of  the  Siberian 
ice  sheet  to  develop  into  a  real  icecap,  consists  of  the  fact  that 
while  the  melting  of  the  thin  Siberian  ice  sheet  left  a  perma- 
frost in  which  many  remains  could  be  preserved,  the  melting 
of  the  Wisconsin  icecap  left  temperate  conditions  in  which 
nothing  could  be  preserved  except  what  happened  to  find 


sj66  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

itself  in  bogs.  Thus  the  great  accumulations  of  bodies,  such 
as  are  found  in  Siberia,  and  such  as  probably  also  were  piled 
up  by  the  rushing  torrents  coming  from  the  melting  Wis- 
consin icecap,  simply  rotted  away  and  left  not  a  trace  behind. 
Now  that  we  have  satisfactorily  established  that  the  masto- 
dons were  imprisoned  in  the  Wisconsin  icecap  itself,  it  is 
necessary  to  add  the  correction  that,  despite  this,  they  also 
survived  the  ice  age,  at  least  in  western  North  America. 
Radiocarbon  dates  from  9,600  to  5,300  years  ago  have  been 
found  for  some  mastodon  remains.  It  must  be  conceded  that 
they  may  possibly  have  survived  in  North  America  until  a 
much  later  date  than  this.  They  therefore  could  have  lived 
in  New  York  State  after  the  ice  age  and  have  been  caught  in 
bogs.  But  they  must  also  have  lived  in  New  York  State  before 
the  ice  age  and  been  caught  in  the  icecap,  for  otherwise  their 
remains  would  not  have  been  found  in  so  many  cases  inter- 
mixed with  the  glacial  materials  (434). 


8.  Storm! 

I  have  referred  to  the  possibility  that  the  extinction  of  ani- 
mals and  preservation  of  their  bodies  may  be  accounted  for 
in  part  by  violent  atmospheric  disturbances,  and  I  have  of- 
fered some  evidence  that  such  disturbances  did  accompany 
the  last  displacement  of  the  crust,  and  therefore,  presum- 
ably, earlier  displacements. 

It  may  be  hard  to  distinguish  between  the  effects  on  ani- 
mal life  of  ice  action  (that  is,  of  being  melted  out  of  glaciers 
and  subjected  to  the  action  of  glacial  streams)  and  the  effects 
of  atmospheric  factors.  Nevertheless,  perhaps  some  evidence 
of  the  operation  of  the  atmospheric  factors  is  available. 

The  evidence  is  presented,  in  part,  by  Professor  Frank  C. 
Hibben,  in  The  Lost  Americans,  and  since  his  description  of 
the  evidence  is  firsthand,  and  is  presented  so  clearly,  I  have 
asked  his  permission  to  reproduce  the  pertinent  passages. 

He  begins  with  a  general  description  of  the  Alaskan  muck, 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  267 

in  which  enormous  quantities  of  bones  (and  even  parts  of 
bodies)  are  found: 

In  many  places  the  Alaskan  muck  is  packed  with  animal  bones  and 
debris  in  trainload  lots.  Bones  of  mammoth,  mastodon,  several  kinds 
of  bison,  horses,  wolves,  bears,  and  lions  tell  a  story  of  a  f  aunal  popu- 
lation. .  .  . 

The  Alaskan  muck  is  like  a  fine,  dark  gray  sand.  .  .  .  Within  this 
mass,  frozen  solid,  lie  the  twisted  parts  of  animals  and  trees  inter- 
mingled with  lenses  of  ice  and  layers  of  peat  and  mosses.  It  looks  as 
though  in  the  midst  of  some  cataclysmic  catastrophe  of  ten  thousand 
years  ago  the  whole  Alaskan  world  of  living  animals  and  plants  was 
suddenly  frozen  in  midmotion  in  a  grim  charade.  .  .  . 

Throughout  the  Yukon  and  its  tributaries,  the  gnawing  currents 
of  the  river  had  eaten  into  many  a  frozen  bank  of  muck  to  reveal 
bones  and  tusks  of  these  animals  protruding  at  all  levels.  Whole 
gravel  bars  in  the  muddy  river  were  formed  of  the  jumbled  fragments 
of  animal  remains.  .  .  .  (212:90-92). 

In  a  later  chapter  Professor  Hibben  writes: 

The  Pleistocene  period  ended  in  death.  This  is  no  ordinary  extinc- 
tion of  a  vague  geological  period  which  fizzled  to  an  uncertain  end. 
This  death  was  catastrophic  and  all-inclusive.  .  .  .  The  large  animals 
that  had  given  their  name  to  the  period  became  extinct.  Their  death 
marked  the  end  of  an  era. 

But  how  did  they  die?  What  caused  the  extinction  of  forty  million 
animals?  This  mystery  forms  one  of  the  oldest  detective  stories  in  the 
world.  A  good  detective  story  involves  humans  and  death.  These 
conditions  are  met  at  the  end  of  the  Pleistocene.  In  this  particular 
case,  the  death  was  of  such  colossal  proportions  as  to  be  staggering  to 
contemplate.  .  .  . 

The  "corpus  delicti"  of  the  deceased  in  this  mystery  may  be  found 
almost  everywhere  ...  the  animals  of  the  period  wandered  into 
every  corner  of  the  New  World  not  actually  covered  by  the  ice  sheets. 
Their  bones  lie  bleaching  on  the  sands  of  Florida  and  in  the  gravels 
of  New  Jersey.  They  weather  out  of  the  dry  terraces  of  Texas  and 
protrude  from  the  sticky  ooze  of  the  tar  pits  of  Wiltshire  Boulevard 
in  Los  Angeles.  Thousands  of  these  remains  have  been  encountered 
in  Mexico  and  even  in  South  America.  The  bodies  lie  as  articulated 
skeletons  revealed  by  dust  storms,  or  as  isolated  bones  and  fragments 
in  ditches  or  canals.  The  bodies  of  the  victims  are  everywhere  in  evi- 
dence. 

It  might  at  first  appear  that  many  of  these  great  animals  died 


268  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

natural  deaths;  that  is,  that  the  remains  that  we  find  in  the  Pleistocene 
strata  over  the  continent  represent  the  normal  death  that  ends  the 
ordinary  life  cycle.  However,  where  we  can  study  these  animals  in 
some  detail,  such  as  in  the  great  bone  pits  of  Nebraska,  we  find  liter- 
ally thousands  of  these  remains  together.  The  young  lie  with  the  old, 
foal  with  dam  and  calf  with  cow.  Whole  herds  of  animals  were  appar- 
ently killed  together,  overcome  by  some  common  power. 

We  have  already  seen  that  the  muck  pits  of  Alaska  are  filled  with 
the  evidences  of  universal  death.  Mingled  in  these  frozen  masses  are 
the  remains  of  many  thousands  of  animals  killed  in  their  prime.  The 
best  evidence  we  could  have  that  this  Pleistocene  death  was  not  sim- 
ply a  case  of  the  bison  and  the  mammoth  dying  after  their  normal 
span  of  years  is  found  in  the  Alaskan  muck.  In  this  dark  gray  frozen 
stuff  is  preserved,  quite  commonly,  fragments  of  ligaments,  skin,  hair, 
and  even  flesh.  We  have  gained  from  the  muck  pits  of  the  Yukon 
Valley  a  picture  of  quick  extinction.  The  evidences  of  violence  there 
are  as  obvious  as  in  the  horror  camps  of  Germany.  Such  piles  of 
bodies  of  animals  or  men  simply  do  not  occur  by  any  ordinary  natural 
means.  .  .  .  (212:168-70). 

So  far,  Professor  Hibben's  description  of  the  evidence  in 
Alaska  may  be  consistent  with  the  solution  I  have  suggested 
for  the  evidence  in  Siberia,  and  for  the  area  of  the  former 
Wisconsin  icecap.  No  doubt  Alaska  also  had  a  temporary 
icecap,  since  it  was,  in  effect,  merely  an  extension  of  Siberia, 
and  apparently  had  the  same  kinds  of  animals  at  about  the 
same  time.  However,  it  is  evident  that  the  animals  that  were 
killed  far  to  the  south,  in  Florida,  Texas,  Mexico,  and 
South  America,  cannot  have  been  contained  in  any  icecap, 
whether  thin  or  thick.  Professor  Hibben  suggests  that  other 
factors  were  at  work. 

One  of  the  most  interesting  of  the  theories  of  the  Pleistocene  end 
is  that  which  explains  this  ancient  tragedy  by  world-wide,  earth- 
shaking  volcanic  eruptions  of  catastrophic  violence.  This  bizarre  idea, 
queerly  enough,  has  considerable  support,  especially  in  the  Alaskan 
and  Siberian  regions.  Interspersed  in  the  muck  depths  and  sometimes 
through  the  very  piles  of  bones  .and  tusks  themselves  are  layers  of 
volcanic  ash.  There  is  no  doubt  that  coincidental  with  the  end  of  the 
Pleistocene  animals,  at  least  in  Alaska,  there  were  volcanic  eruptions 
of  tremendous  proportions.  It  stands  to  reason  that  animals  whose 
flesh  is  still  preserved  must  have  been  killed  and  buried  quickly  to 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  269 

be  preserved  at  all.  Bodies  that  die  and  lie  on  the  surface  soon  dis- 
integrate and  the  bones  are  scattered.  A  volcanic  eruption  would  ex- 
plain the  end  of  the  Alaskan  animals  all  at  one  time,  and  in  a  manner 
that  would  satisfy  the  evidences  there  as  we  know  them.  The  herds 
would  be  killed  in  their  tracks  either  by  the  blanket  of  volcanic  ash 
covering  them  and  causing  death  by  heat  or  suffocation,  or,  indirectly, 
by  volcanic  gases.  Toxic  clouds  of  gas  from  volcanic  upheavals  could 
well  cause  death  on  a  gigantic  scale.  .  .  . 

Throughout  the  Alaskan  mucks,  too,  there  is  evidence  of  atmos- 
pheric disturbances  of  unparalleled  violence.  Mammoth  and  bison 
alike  were  torn  and  twisted  as  though  by  a  cosmic  hand  in  Godly 
rage.  In  one  place,  we  can  find  the  foreleg  and  shoulder  of  a  mam- 
moth with  portions  of  the  flesh  and  the  toenails  and  the  hair  still 
clinging  to  the  blackened  bones.  Close  by  is  the  neck  and  skull  of  a 
bison  with  the  vertebrae  clinging  together  with  tendons  and  liga- 
ments and  the  chitinous  covering  of  the  horns  intact.  There  is  no 
mark  of  a  knife  or  cutting  instrument.  The  animals  were  simply  torn 
apart  and  scattered  over  the  landscape  like  things  of  straw  and  string, 
even  though  some  of  them  weighed  several  tons.  Mixed  with  the  piles 
of  bones  are  trees,  also  twisted  and  torn  and  piled  in  tangled  groups; 
and  the  whole  is  covered  with  fine  sifting  muck,  then  frozen  solid. 

Storms,  too,  accompany  volcanic  disturbances  of  the  proportions 
indicated  here.  Differences  in  temperature  and  the  influence  of  the 
cubic  miles  of  ash  and  pumice  thrown  into  the  air  by  eruptions  of 
this  sort  might  well  produce  winds  and  blasts  of  inconceivable  vio- 
lence. If  this  is  the  explanation  of  the  end  of  all  this  animal  life,  the 
Pleistocene  period  was  terminated  by  a  very  exciting  time  indeed 
(212:176-78). 

In  Chapters  IV  and  VII  we  saw  that  volcanic  eruptions, 
possibly  on  a  great  scale,  are  a  corollary  of  any  displacement 
of  the  crust;  therefore,  our  theory  strongly  supports  and  re- 
inforces the  suggestions  advanced  by  Professor  Hibben,  and 
at  the  same  time  his  evidence  strongly  supports  our  theory. 
But  Professor  Hibben  points  out  certain  consequences  that 
would  flow  from  our  theory,  which  I  have  not  stressed.  Wher- 
ever volcanism  is  very  intensive,  toxic  gases  could  locally  be 
very  effective  in  destroying  life.  This  is  also  true  of  violent 
local  windstorms.  Massive  volcanic  eruptions  might,  of 
course,  occur  anywhere  on  earth  during  a  movement  of  the 
crust,  and  we  saw,  in  Chapter  VII,  that  they  apparently  oc- 


270  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

curred  in  a  good  many  places,  some  of  them  far  removed 
from  the  ice  sheets  themselves. 

Despite  the  unquestionable  importance  of  these  locally 
acting  factors,  it  seems  that  we  must  give  much  greater  im- 
portance to  the  meteorological  results  of  the  universally  act- 
ing volcanic  dust.  As  we  have  noted,  this  dust  has  a  powerful 
effect  in  reducing  the  average  temperatures  of  the  earth's 
surface.  A  sufficient  fall  in  temperature  could  easily  wipe  out 
large  numbers  of  animals,  either  directly,  or  by  killing  their 
food,  or  even  by  favoring  the  spread  of  epidemic  diseases. 
Then,  the  dust  could  greatly  increase  rainfall,  which,  in  cer- 
tain circumstances,  would  produce  extensive  floods,  thus 
drowning  numbers  of  animals  and  perhaps  piling  their  bod- 
ies in  certain  spots.  As  already  mentioned,  the  dust  would 
also  act  to  increase  the  temperature  differences  between  the 
climatic  zones  (the  temperature  gradient),  thereby  increasing, 
perhaps  very  noticeably,  the  average  wind  velocities  every- 
where. Violent  gales,  lasting  for  days  at  a  time,  and  recurring 
frequently  throughout  the  year,  might  raise  great  dust  storms, 
in  which  animals  might  be  caught  and  killed  by  thirst  or  suf- 
focation. It  must  not  be  forgotten  that,  at  the  same  time, 
changes  in  land  elevations  would  be  in  progress,  and  these 
also  would  be  affecting  the  climate  and  the  availability  of 
food  supplies.  The  gradual  character  of  these  changes  would 
be  punctuated,  at  times,  by  the  abrupt  release  of  accumulat- 
ing tensions  in  the  crust,  accompanied  by  terrific  earthquakes 
and  by  sudden  changes  of  elevation  locally  amounting  per- 
haps to  a  good  many  feet,  which  also  could  be  the  cause  of 
floods  either  inland  (by  the  sudden  damming  of  rivers)  or 
along  the  coasts.  There  is,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  as  already 
mentioned,  much  evidence  of  turbulence  throughout  the 
world,  during  the  last  North  American  ice  age,  not  only  in 
the  air  but  in  the  sea. 

I  have  not  been  able  to  make  a  complete  survey  of  this  evi- 
dence. Nevertheless,  a  few  additional  items  have  come  to  my 
attention.  Ericson,  for  example,  finds  that  turbidity  currents 
in  the  sea  were  more  powerful  during  the  ice  age  than  they 


THE    GREAT    EXTINCTIONS  271 

are  today  (141:217).  Kulp  found,  by  radiocarbon  dating,  that 
deposition  of  sediments  along  the  eastern  coast  of  North 
America  occurred  at  a  fast  rate  prior  to  about  15,000  years 
ago  (262).  Millis  cited  evidence  of  very  violent  winds  during 
the  melting  phase  of  the  Wisconsin  icecap  (308:14).  Violent 
storms  would  seem  a  very  natural  explanation  for  the  pe- 
culiar finds  of  many  bodies  of  animals  crammed  into  caverns 
and  fissures,  dating  from  various  geological  periods,  that 
have  been  found  in  various  parts  of  the  world.  Hibben  men- 
tions one  of  these  (212:173-74).  It  would  seem  possible  that, 
in  storms  of  the  character  that  may  have  occurred,  caverns 
may  have  been  the  only  refuges  available  for  man  and  beast 
alike.  Dodson  refers  to  the  fact  that  the  destruction  of  ani- 
mals in  dust  storms  was  apparently  the  cause  of  the  preserva- 
tion of  many  fossils  (115:77).  Volchok  and  Kulp,  in  their  ex- 
amination of  ionium  dating  as  applied  to  several  Atlantic 
Ocean  deep-sea  cores,  remarked  that  "at  the  close  of  the  Wis- 
consin [glacial  period]  the  rates  of  sedimentation  for  both 
sediment  types  [red  clay  and  Globigerina  ooze]  increased  by 
factors  of  2-4"  (442a:2ig).  This  means  that  the  rate  of  dep- 
osition of  sediment  in  the  deep  sea  at  these  points  was  in- 
creased by  from  200  to  400  per  cent.  This  certainly  suggests 
an  unusual  turbulence  for  the  climate. 

It  is  little  wonder  that,  faced  by  all  these  unpleasant  con- 
ditions, a  good  many  species  in  all  parts  of  the  world,  even 
very  far  from  the  icecaps,  gave  up  the  struggle  for  existence. 

In  conclusion,  it  appears  to  me  that  the  whole  mass  of  the 
evidence  relative  to  the  animal  and  plant  remains  in  the 
Siberian  tundra,  interpreted  in  the  light  of  the  evidence 
from  North  America,  sufficiently  confirms  the  conclusion 
that  there  was  a  northward  displacement  of  Siberia  coinci- 
dent with  the  southward  displacement  of  North  America 
at  the  end  of  the 


IX  :  EARLIER  DISPLACEMENTS 
OF  THE  CRUST 

/.  Introduction 

According  to  the  evidence  presented  in  the  last  two  chapters, 
the  Hudson  Bay  region  lay  at  the  North  Pole  during  the 
period  of  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet.  It  is  not  possible  (with 
evidence  now  at  hand)  to  define  the  geographical  position 
of  the  pole  more  exactly;  it  may  have  been  located  in  Hudson 
Bay  itself,  somewhat  to  the  west  in  Keewatin,  or  somewhat  to 
the  east  in  the  province  of  Quebec.  Coleman  refers  to  the 
fact  that  the  earlier  advance  of  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet  en- 
tered Michigan  from  the  north—  from  the  direction  of  Hud- 
son Bay—  rather  than  from  Labrador  (87:16).  Flint  remarks: 

...  It  is  evident  that  in  Gary  time,  the  ice  first  entered  Minnesota 
from  the  Rainy  Lake  District  on  the  north,  later  from  the  northwest, 
and  still  later  from  the  northeast  via  the  Lake  Superior  basin.  .  .  . 


Flint  explains  that  all  the  known  centers  of  the  Wisconsin 
glaciation  are  relatively  late;  they  date  from  the  declining 
stage,  when,  according  to  our  theory,  the  crust  was  in  mo- 
tion. The  evidence  of  the  earlier  centers  would,  he  points 
out,  have  been  destroyed  by  the  ice  flow  of  later  times  (375: 
171).  It  is  evident  that  the  two  principal  ice  sheets  in  this  re- 
gion—the so-called  Keewatin  and  Labradorean  ice  sheets- 
were  part  of  the  same  glaciation,  and  were  contemporary, 
although  the  western  center  was  the  first  to  develop.  Coleman 
mentions  that  this  earlier  phase  of  the  ice  sheet—  the  so-called 
Keewatin—  transported  boulders  from  the  Laurentian  area 
near  Hudson  Bay  to  the  foothills  of  southern  Alberta,  depos- 
iting them  at  an  altitude  of  4,500  feet  (87:15).  This  would 
indicate  that  the  ice  was  moving  westward  from  Hudson  Bay. 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS    OF    CRUST  273 

It  would  also  indicate  that  the  ice  sheet  at  this  time  was 
about  a  mile  thick,  while  the  Labrador  ice  sheet,  at  least 
in  its  later  phases,  was  not  nearly  so  thick  (375:169).  The 
suggestion  here  is  strong  that  the  pole  was  in  Hudson  Bay 
itself,  and  that  the  Labrador  ice  sheet  began  to  develop 
when  the  main  ice  sheet  was  wasting.  It  is  possible  that  it 
took  over  as  the  glacial  center  because  the  supply  of  moisture 
to  feed  the  thinning  icecap  was  better  nearer  the  coast.  This 
might  have  been  the  result,  in  part,  of  the  opening  up  of 
water  areas  by  the  shrinking  of  the  icecap. 

Now,  it  follows  logically  that  if  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet 
existed  because  the  Hudson  Bay  region  lay  at  the  pole,  and 
if  it  disappeared  because  of  a  displacement  of  the  crust  that 
moved  North  America  away  from  the  pole,  then  the  Wiscon- 
sin ice  sheet  must  have  been  brought  into  existence  as  the 
result  of  an  earlier  displacement.  The  question,  therefore, 
now  arises,  Where  was  the  pole  situated  previous  to  its  loca- 
tion in  or  near  Hudson  Bay?  It  also  becomes  important  to 
establish  as  closely  as  possible  the  date  of  this  earlier  dis- 
placement. 

We  have  already  discussed  the  date  of  the  beginning  of  the 
climatic  change  that  produced  the  Wisconsin  glaciation.  A 
considerable  amount  of  evidence  has  now  accumulated  that 
there  were  Wisconsin  glacial  phases  earlier  than  the  Farm- 
dale  (133).  Furthermore,  we  must  remember  that  the  Farm- 
dale  date  of  25,000  years  ago  is  only  the  date  of  the  invasion 
of  Ohio  by  the  ice  sheet,  which  had  previously  to  advance  a 
long  way  from  its  center  of  origin.  Evidence  to  be  presented 
below  will  strongly  support  the  conclusion  that  the  begin- 
ning of  the  change  of  climate—that  is,  of  the  movement  of 
the  crust— that  eventually  produced  the  Wisconsin  icecap 
was  about  50,000  years  ago.  This  date,  as  we  shall  see,  is 
not  in  conflict  with  evidence  of  cold  climate  in  the  North 
Atlantic  extending  back  considerably  further. 

With  the  date  of  the  beginning  of  the  Wisconsin  glacia- 
tion tentatively  fixed  in  this  fashion,  it  is  possible,  by  the  use 


274  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

of  certain  methods  of  deduction,  to  reach  an  educated  guess 
as  to  what  area  lay  at  the  pole  during  the  previous  period. 

The  method  of  locating  a  previous  polar  position  is  simple 
in  principle,  but  very  complicated  in  practice.  The  prin- 
ciple is  to  find  a  point  on  a  circle  drawn  about  the  last  estab- 
lished polar  position  with  a  radius  of  the  same  order  of 
magnitude  as  the  distance  between  the  present  pole  and  the 
last  position.  The  assumption  underlying  this  is  that  while 
one  displacement  may  move  the  crust  (and  therefore  shift  the 
poles)  farther  than  another,  the  chances  are  against  any  very 
great  differences.  It  seems  that  the  last  displacement,  which 
brought  Hudson  Bay  down  from  the  pole,  amounted  to 
about  2,000  miles  on  the  meridian  of  maximum  displace- 
ment. We  shall  therefore  start  out  with  the  idea  that  the 
previous  displacement  may  have  been  of  about  the  same 
magnitude,  but  it  can  easily  have  been  half  as  great  or  twice 
as  great.  This  can  later  be  checked  with  the  field  evidence. 

Our  first  step  is  to  draw  a  circle  around  the  hypothetical 
polar  position  in  Hudson  Bay,  with  a  radius  of  2,000  miles. 
Now,  with  a  very  liberal  margin  of  error,  we  can  assume  that 
the  previous  pole  lay  somewhere  near  that  circle.  Our  second 
step  is  to  check  the  field  evidence  for  past  climates  for  the 
whole  earth  to  see  what  position  on  or  near  that  circle  will 
explain  the  most  facts. 

The  difficulties  encountered  in  assembling  the  evidence 
for  a  pole  in  Hudson  Bay  were  very  great,  but  they  did  not 
compare  with  the  difficulties  of  establishing  a  reasonable 
case  for  the  position  of  the  previous  pole.  For  this  earlier 
period,  embracing  about  40,000  years,  the  evidence  was  much 
scantier.  The  margins  of  error  on  all  climatic  determinations 
had  to  be  much  greater.  The  numerous  lines  of  evidence 
had  to  be  examined  in  the  light  of  the  conscious  and  uncon- 
scious assumptions  applied  to  them  by  previous  workers, 
whose  objectives  and  methods  had  been  influenced  by  an 
entirely  different  set  of  ideas,  and  whose  interpretations  of 
the  evidence  might  therefore  be  very  different  from  mine. 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  275 

The  method  used  was  that  of  trial  and  error.  I  selected  a 
possible  location,  and  then  searched  the  available  evidence 
to  see  whether  that  location  was  reasonable.  I  tried  many 
locations,  giving  up  one  after  another  as  facts  turned  out  to 
conflict  with  each  of  them. 

After  the  Hudson  Bay  location  had  been  settled  to  my 
satisfaction,  I  considered,  for  a  while,  that  the  previous  posi- 
tion might  have  been  in  Scandinavia.  I  was  forced  to  aban- 
don that  idea.  Other  positions,  investigated  in  turn,  included 
Spitzbergen,  Iceland,  and  Alberta.  There  was  a  great  deal  of 
shifting  back  and  forth. 

Finally,  clarity  began  to  set  in;  ever  more  numerous  facts 
began  to  fall  into  place,  and  at  last  I  had  reason  to  feel  that 
my  feet  were  on  solid  ground.  The  previous  position  of  the 
pole  was,  I  concluded,  in  or  near  southern  Greenland,  or 
between  Greenland  and  Iceland.  That  is,  the  Greenland 
region  then  lay  at  the  pole. 

I  repeated  the  process,  with  this  polar  position  as  the  cen- 
ter of  my  circle,  and  a  rather  flexible  radius,  and  came  up, 
to  my  considerable  surprise,  with  a  pole  somewhere  in  or 
near  Alaska,  perhaps  in  the  Alaska  Peninsula  or  in  the  Aleu- 
tian Islands.  This  third  pole  takes  us  back  to  about  130,000 
years  ago,  and  of  course  the  evidence  for  it  is  much  slighter 
than  that  for  the  Greenland  pole.  Despite  the  fact  that  this 
hypothetical  position  is  hardly  more  than  a  suggestion  to 
guide  further  research,  it  is  highly  important  because  it 
serves  as  a  point  of  reference  to  "box  in"  the  Greenland  pole. 

It  is  impossible,  with  the  evidence  now  at  hand,  to  recon- 
struct any  earlier  displacements  of  the  crust.  However,  evi- 
dence of  a  late  Pleistocene  continental  glaciation  in  Eurasia 
suggests  the  possibility  of  one  or  two  former  polar  zones  in 
that  land  mass.  Though  this  evidence  has  been  known  to 
Russian  geologists  for  many  years,  it  has  attracted  the  atten- 
tion of  Western  geologists  only  since  1946  (219).  One  of  these 
positions  may  account  for  the  so-called  "Riss"  glaciation  in 
Europe. 


276 


EARTH    S     SHIFTING     CRUST 


90*     85' WEST    FROM  GREENWICH 


I 

S 


T 


95*     90*  EAST    FROM  GREENWICH 


Fig.  VII.    Antarctica:  Three  Earlier  Locations  of  the  South  Pole 

A  corresponds  to  the  North  Pole  in  Alaska,  B  to  the  North  Pole  in  Green- 

land,  and  G  to  the  North  Pole  in  Hudson  Bay.  Positions  are  approximate. 


At  a  still  earlier  time,  western  Canada  may  have  lain  at 
the  pole,  and  this  may  account  for  the  so-called  Illinoisan 
glaciation— the  ice  age  that  preceded  the  Sangamon  Inter- 
glacial.  However,  since  the  quantity  of  the  evidence  declines 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF    CRUST  277 

by  a  geometrical  progression  as  we  go  backwards,  clearly 
these  earliest  suggested  positions  for  the  crust  are  of  value 
only  as  guides  to  research. 

I  am  suggesting  three  displacements  of  the  crust  in  the 
last  130,000  years,  the  intervals  between  being  of  the  order 
of  30,000  or  40,000  years.  Considering  the  fact  that  the  Wis- 
consin glaciation,  if  it  started  about  50,000  years  ago,  had 
an  over-all  span  of  about  40,000  years,  it  is  not  unreasonable 
to  assume  similar  spans  for  the  earlier  periods,  though  per- 
haps we  should  allow  for  a  considerable  variation  of  their 
lengths.  Whether  this  rapid  pace  was  maintained  all  through 
the  earth's  history  is  a  matter  that  perhaps  cannot  be  settled 
at  this  time;  however,  I  will  discuss  it  briefly  further  on. 
So  far  as  the  Pleistocene  is  concerned,  Suess  and  Emiliani, 
at  least,  see  evidence  that  major  climatic  change  did  take 
place  at  that  rate  (409:357).  Their  explanation  that  climatic 
changes  resulted  from  the  cyclical  astronomical  curve  of 
solar  radiation  is  not  convincing,  for  reasons  already  made 
clear. 

Much  of  the  evidence  that  I  will  use  to  support  this  sug- 
gested series  of  displacements  is  in  the  form  of  cross  sections 
of  sedimentary  deposits,  called  cores,  which  often  singly  em- 
brace very  long  periods  of  time.  Rather  than  discuss  each 
core  separately,  the  simplest  method  will  be  to  assemble  the 
evidence  from  all  the  cores,  so  far  as  it  bears  on  each  sug- 
gested polar  position  in  turn.  The  lines  of  evidence  include 
marine  cores  from  the  Arctic,  Antarctic,  North  Atlantic, 
Equatorial  Atlantic,  and  South  Pacific  Oceans,  and  the  Carib- 
bean Sea;  many  radiocarbon  and  oxygen  isotope  findings, 
pollen  studies,  and  various  evidences  relating  to  the  inter- 
glacial  periods.  The  purpose  of  the  presentation  of  this  evi- 
dence will  be  to  explain  the  known  major  climatic  changes 
of  the  last  130,000  years,  in  terms  of  displacements  of  the 
earth's  crust.  Before  attempting  this  reconstruction  of  the 
glacial  history  of  the  late  Pleistocene  Epoch,  however,  we 
must  first  discuss  some  of  the  current  ideas  in  this  field. 


278  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

2.  Weakness  of  the  Accepted  Glacial  Chronology 

Geologists  are  used  to  thinking  of  four  major  glaciations 
during  the  million-year  period  of  the  Pleistocene.  They  have 
assumed  that  each  glaciation  affected  the  earth  as  a  whole 
simultaneously,  causing  ice  sheets  in  both  Northern  and 
Southern  Hemispheres,  and  lowered  temperatures  generally. 
Some  geologists  have  questioned  this  concept  of  four  glacia- 
tions; it  is  at  least  necessary  to  recognize  several  successive 
phases  of  advance  and  retreat  for  the  older  glaciations. 
Whether  these  interruptions  were  merely  interstadials,  like 
those  of  the  Wisconsin  glaciation,  or  were  true  interglacials 
it  is  increasingly  hard  to  decide  the  further  back  in  time  one 
goes.  According  to  the  accompanying  chart  of  the  glacial 
periods  (p.  282),  it  is  evident  that  the  intervals  between  the 
different  stages  of  the  major  glacial  periods  are  in  some  cases 
longer  than  the  entire  duration  of  the  Wisconsin  glaciation. 
It  does  not  seem  reasonable,  therefore,  to  insist  that  they 
were  merely  interstadials,  nor,  consequently,  to  insist  upon 
the  number  of  just  four  glaciations  during  the  Pleistocene. 
This  becomes  more  apparent  when  we  consider  the  im- 
plications of  the  Eurasian  continental  glaciation  mentioned 
above.  This,  obviously,  makes  at  least  a  fifth  Pleistocene 
glaciation,  but  the  matter  does  not  end  there.  The  question 
must  be  asked,  If  European  geologists  could  overlook  the 
evidences  of  this  comparatively  recent  glaciation  until  the 
last  decade  (and  this  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  evidences 
were  spread  widely  over  two  continents,  and  had  attracted 
the  attention  of  Russian  geologists  as  long  as  seventy-five 
years  ago),  how  many  other  glaciations  in  various  parts  of 
the  world  may  not  have  escaped  attention?  Flint  has  pointed 
out  how  easily  glacial  evidence  can  be  destroyed  (342:171), 
Coleman  also  emphasized  the  same  thing: 

It  might  be  supposed  that  so  important  a  change  would  leave  be- 
hind it  evidence  that  no  one  could  dispute,  and  that  there  should  be 
no  room  for  doubt  as  to  what  happened  in  so  recent  a  time  of  the 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF    CRUST  279 

earth's  history.  In  reality  the  proof  of  the  complete  disappearance  of 
the  ice  and  its  return  at  a  later  time  is,  in  the  nature  of  things,  a 
matter  of  great  difficulty  and  it  is  not  surprising  that  there  are  differ- 
ences of  opinion  (87:20). 

Croll  pointed  out  the  ephemeral  character  of  glacial  evi- 
dence eighty  years  ago  in  books  that  are  still  eminently 
readable.  After  first  discussing  the  accumulations  of  strata 
containing  plant  and  animal  remains  during  a  period  of 
temperate  climate,  he  comments  thus  on  their  subsequent 
destruction: 

.  .  .  We  need  not  wonder  that  not  a  single  vestige  of  [these  strata]  re- 
mains; for  when  the  ice  sheet  again  crept  over  the  island  [Britain] 
everything  animate  and  inanimate  would  be  ground  down  to  powder. 
We  are  certain  that  prior  to  the  glacial  epoch  our  island  must  have 
been  covered  with  life  and  vegetation.  But  not  a  single  vestige  of 
these  is  now  to  be  found;  no,  not  even  of  the  very  soil  on  which  the 
vegetation  grew.  The  solid  rock  itself  upon  which  the  soil  lay  has 
been  ground  down  to  mud  by  the  ice  sheet,  and,  to  a  large  extent,  as 
Professor  Geikie  remarks,  swept  away  into  the  adjoining  seas  (91:257). 

It  is  obvious,  of  course,  that  whatever  could  destroy  all  the 
surface  deposits  of  a  temperate  period  would  also,  at  the 
same  time,  destroy  any  evidences  of  former  glaciations.  Croll 
goes  on  to  say: 

It  is  on  a  land  surface  that  the  principal  traces  of  the  action  of 
ice  during  a  glacial  period  are  left,  for  it  is  there  that  the  stones  are 
chiefly  striated,  the  rocks  ground  down,  and  the  boulder  clay  formed. 
But  where  are  all  our  ancient  land  surfaces?  They  are  not  to  be  found. 
The  total  thickness  of  the  stratified  rocks  of  Great  Britain  is,  accord- 
ing to  Professor  Ramsay,  nearly  fourteen  miles.  But  from  the  bottom 
to  the  top  of  this  enormous  pile  of  deposits  there  is  hardly  a  single 
land  surface  to  be  detected.  True,  patches  of  old  land  surfaces  of  a 
local  character  exist,  such,  for  example,  as  the  dirt  beds  of  Portland; 
but,  with  the  exception  of  coal  seams,  every  general  formation  from 
top  to  bottom  has  been  accumulated  under  water,  and  none  but  the 
under-clays  ever  existed  as  a  land  surface.  And  it  is  here,  in  such  a 
formation,  that  the  geologist  has  to  collect  all  his  information  regard- 
ing the  existence  of  former  glacial  periods.  .  .  . 

If  we  examine  the  matter  fully  we  shall  be  led  to  conclude  that 
the  transformation  of  a  land  surface  into  a  sea-bottom  (by  erosion  and 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

deposition  of  the  sediments)  will  probably  completely  obliterate  every 
trace  of  glaciation  which  the  land  surface  may  once  have  pre- 
sented. .  .  . 

The  only  evidence  of  the  existence  of  land  ice  during  former 
periods  which  we  can  reasonably  expect  to  meet  with  in  the  stratified 
rocks,  consists  of  erratic  blocks  which  may  have  been  transported  by 
icebergs  and  dropped  into  the  sea.  But  unless  the  glaciers  of  such 
periods  reached  the  sea,  we  could  not  possibly  possess  even  this  evi- 
dence. Traces  in  the  stratified  rocks  of  the  effects  of  land-ice  during 
former  epochs  must,  in  the  nature  of  things,  be  rare  indeed  (91:267- 
69). 

Croll  was  interested  in  pointing  out  the  impermanence  of 
glacial  evidence.  He  continued,  therefore,  as  follows: 

The  reason  why  we  now  have,  comparatively  speaking,  so  little 
direct  evidence  of  former  glacial  periods  will  be  more  forcibly  im- 
pressed upon  the  mind,  if  we  reflect  on  how  difficult  it  would  be  in  a 
million  or  so  of  years  hence  to  find  any  trace  of  what  we  now  call  the 
glacial  epoch.  The  striated  stones  would  by  that  time  be  all,  or  nearly 
all,  disintegrated,  and  the  till  washed  away  and  deposited  in  the 
bottom  of  the  sea  as  stratified  sands  and  clays.  .  .  .  (91:270). 

In  view  of  the  facts  presented  by  Croll,  it  would  appear  to 
be  most  unreasonable  to  insist  on  any  fixed  number  of 
Pleistocene  glaciations  simply  because  hitherto  it  has  been 
possible  to  group,  in  a  very  rough  way,  the  comparatively 
few  evidences  we  have  in  four  glacial  periods. 

It  is  a  well-known  fact  that  the  chronology  of  four  Pleisto- 
cene glaciations  has  been  built  up  on  the  foundation  of  the 
assumption  that  all  glacial  epochs  were  the  result  of  lowered 
world  temperatures.  Thus  the  European  glaciations  were 
declared  to  have  been  contemporary  with  the  glaciations  in 
America,  although,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  no  evidence  of  this 
existed.  The  assumption  was  based  solely  on  astronomical 
and  other  theories  of  the  causes  of  glaciation  that  we  have 
shown  to  be  inadequate.  If  the  grouping  of  all  European 
glacial  evidences  into  only  four  major  glaciations  is  ques- 
tionable, and  if,  in  addition,  there  is  no  good  evidence  that 
these  glaciations  were  really  contemporary  with  those  in 
America,  then  the  possibility  of  a  large  number  of  different 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF    CRUST  281 

glaciations  in  America  and  Europe  during  the  Pleistocene 
must  be  taken  seriously. 

If  the  number  of  these  alleged  major  Pleistocene  glacia- 
tions is  not  satisfactorily  established,  the  attempts  at  dating 
them  leave  even  more  to  be  desired.  A  review  of  the  past  and 
current  literature  on  the  subject  reveals  lack  of  agreement. 
Estimates  vary  widely,  and  none  of  them  has  convincing  sup- 
port. To  make  this  plain,  it  is  only  necessary  to  compare  the 
various  estimates.  The  table  on  page  282  shows  the  estimates 
made  by  Penck  and  Bruckner,  considered  the  leading  Euro- 
pean experts  (whose  work,  however,  was  done  before  the  de- 
velopment of  nuclear  techniques  of  dating),  and  by  Zeuner, 
whose  estimates  were  endorsed  by  the  climatologist  Brooks. 
The  reader  will  note  that  Zeuner  divides  each  of  the  older 
glaciations  into  a  number  of  substages,  some  of  which  are 
longer  than  the  entire  period  covered  by  the  Wisconsin 
glaciation.  The  reader  will  recall  that  the  interstadials  and 
the  successive  advances  of  the  Wisconsin  glaciation  had  dura- 
tions of  the  order  of  two  or  three  thousand  years;  he  may 
also  note  in  the  various  cores  shown  later  on  that  all  the 
cores  show  brief  climatic  changes  of  the  same  magnitude.  It 
is  therefore  impossible  to  concede  that  the  earlier  glaciations 
could  have  had  interstadials  40,000  or  more  years  long.  The 
only  explanation  ever  advanced  for  the  oscillations  of  the  Wis- 
consin ice  sheet  that  I  know  of  is  the  one  advanced  in  this 
book:  massive  volcanism  caused  by  displacement  of  the  crust. 
This  explanation  cannot,  however,  be  reasonably  applied  to 
oscillations  40,000  years  in  length. 

We  see  that  the  estimates  of  Zeuner  (52: 107)  and  of  Penck 
and  Bruckner  (52:107)  are  in  profound  disagreement. 

It  would  be  easily  possible  to  multiply  the  number  of  such 
contradictory  estimates,  or,  if  the  reader  pleases,  he  may  ac- 
cumulate authorities  who  will  support  one  of  them;  but  is 
it  not  obvious  that  if  leading  professional  geologists  can  differ 
to  such  an  extent,  no  real  reliance  can  be  placed  upon  any  of 
their  very  approximate  and  very  speculative  estimates?  And 


28* 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 


TABLE   II 

The  Pleistocene  Glaciations 


Zeuner 
(European) 

Wurm  Glaciation 
Stage  III    25,000 
Stage  II     72,000 
Stage  I     115,000 

Riss  Glaciation 
Stage  II    187,000 
Stage  I     230,000 

Mindel  Glaciation 
Stage  II    435,000 
Stage  I     476,000 

Gunz  Glaciation 
Stage  II   550,000 
Stage  I     590,000 


Penck  8c  Bruckner 
(European) 

40-  18,000 


130-100,000 


430-370,000 


520-490,000 


when,  in  addition,  we  find  they  have  all  been  wrong  as  to 
the  number  of  Pleistocene  glaciations— since  a  fifth  one  has 
just  turned  up— are  we  not  justified  in  dismissing  all  these 
estimates  as  speculations  that  are  no  longer  worth  discussing? 
If  there  is  any  doubt  as  to  the  reasonableness  of  this  con- 
clusion, it  should  be  put  at  rest  by  an  entirely  new  estimate 
of  the  glacial  chronology  just  produced  by  Emiliani.  Emili- 
ani,  working  with  marine  cores,  and  applying  some  of  the 
new  techniques  of  dating,  has  found  that  the  earliest  Pleisto- 
cene glaciation  occurred  only  300,000  years  ago,  and  that  all 
the  four  recognized  European  glaciations,  and  their  alleged 
American  counterparts,  have  to  be  compressed  into  that 
comparatively  short  period  (152).  This  finding,  which  there 
is  no  rational  reason  to  reject,  completes  our  picture;  it 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS    OF    CRUST  283 

disposes,  finally,  it  seems  to  me,  of  the  traditional  glacial 
chronology  of  the  Pleistocene. 

As  a  consequence  of  this  breakdown  of  the  old  theory,  it 
seems  to  me  that  we  must  now  start  from  the  beginning,  and 
build  a  new  glacial  chronology  of  the  Pleistocene.  Our 
method  can  only  be  the  tested  method  of  science:  to  proceed 
from  the  known  to  the  unknown;  from  the  Wisconsin  gla- 
ciation,  where  our  information  is  most  ample,  backwards. 


3.  The  Beginning  of  the  Wisconsin  Glaciation 

Examination  indicates  that,  with  the  elimination  of  some 
mutually  contradictory  and  evidently  disturbed  sediments, 
the  three  Ross  Sea  cores  show  a  change  from  the  deposition 
of  glacial  sediment  to  the  deposition  of  temperate  sediment 
on  the  Ross  Sea  bottom  40,000  years  ago  (p.  306).  As  a  first  step 
in  establishing  an  approximate  date  for  the  beginning  of  the 
climatic  change  (that  is,  for  the  beginning  of  the  movement 
of  the  crust)  that  was  to  produce,  simultaneously,  the  tem- 
perate age  in  Antarctica  and  the  glacial  age  in  North  Amer- 
ica, we  must  interpret  the  meaning  of  this  change  in  the 
sediment. 

In  the  first  place,  the  date  itself  is  subject  to  some  doubt. 
Two  cores  show  the  change  at  40,000  years  ago;  one  shows  it 
a  few  thousand  years  later,  but  at  the  same  time  it  also  shows 
a  change  at  40,000  years  ago  from  one  type  of  glacial  sedi- 
ment to  another.  The  change  in  that  core  is  from  coarse  to 
fine  sediment,  which  in  itself  indicates  amelioration  of  cli- 
mate. Thus,  all  three  cores  indicate  at  least  some  warming 
of  the  climate  about  40,000  years  ago. 

Now,  what  lapse  of  time  must  we  allow  between  the  be- 
ginning of  the  change  of  climate  in  Antarctica  and  the  result- 
ing end  of  glacial  deposition  on  the  Ross  Sea  bottom?  In  the 
first  place,  we  must  remember  that  the  movement  of  the  crust 
would  at  first  be  entirely  imperceptible.  The  speed  of 
the  displacement  would  increase  slowly.  After  several  thou- 


284  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

sand  years  a  warming  of  the  climate  would  be  noticeable 
in  the  areas  moving  equatorward,  and  a  cooling  of  the 
climate  would  occur  in  areas  moving  poleward,  but  these 
long-term  trends  of  change  would  often  be  modified  or 
even  reversed  by  other  factors.  Massive  volcanism  would 
erupt  before  the  crust  had  moved  far,  and  the  effect  might 
be  to  check  the  retreat  of  the  icecap,  and  even  to  cause  its 
readvance  after  it  began  to  retreat.  We  can  see  that  this  seems 
to  have  happened  with  the  Wisconsin  icecap:  for  thousands 
of  years  after  it  began  to  grow  thinner,  and  to  retreat,  it 
went  through  phases  of  readvance. 

Before  the  final  disappearance  of  glacial  sediment  from  the 
Ross  Sea  bottom  about  40,000  years  ago,  then,  we  must  as- 
sume that  the  icecap  then  in  Antarctica  had  gone  through 
an  initial  phase  of  very  gradual  retreat,  followed  by  perhaps 
several  phases  of  readvance,  until  finally  it  withdrew  entirely 
from  the  Ross  Sea  coast,  and  melted  sufficiently  to  permit 
free-flowing  rivers  to  bring  down  temperate-type  sediment 
from  the  interior.  It  seems  obvious,  on  the  analogy  of  the 
Wisconsin  icecap,  that  we  should  allow  a  period  of  time  of 
the  order  of  10,000  years  or  so  for  this  entire  process.  This 
suggests,  then,  that  the  movement  of  the  crust  began  about 
50,000  years  ago.  However,  it  does  not  mean  that  the  move- 
ment ended  40,000  years  ago;  it  might  even  have  continued  for 
another  10,000  years.  The  cores  contain  no  evidence  on  that 
point.  It  may  have  taken  much  more  than  10,000  years  to 
shift  the  crust.  The  core  evidence,  however,  may  be  used  to 
support  the  thesis  that  the  crust  displacement  that  brought 
the  Hudson  Bay  region  to  the  pole  started  about  50,000  years 
ago.  In  the  following  discussion  we  will  tentatively  consider 
that  the  previous  position  of  the  pole  was  in  southern  Green- 
land. 

a.  The  Arctic  Cores 

In  the  last  few  years  Soviet  expeditions  in  the  Arctic  Ocean 
have  taken  a  number  of  deep-sea  cores,  and  have  dated  them 


EARLIER     DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  285 

by  the  ionium  method.  These  cores  provide  impressive  con- 
firmation of  the  situation  of  the  pole  in  North  America  dur- 
ing the  Wisconsin  glaciation,  and,  in  addition,  they  furnish 
evidence  of  the  approximate  date  of  its  migration  to  the 
Hudson  Bay  region  from  its  previous  position. 

The  Soviet  scientists  were  much  impressed  by  their  dis- 
covery that  in  the  comparatively  short  period  of  the  last 
50,000  years  there  have  been  no  less  than  six  major  changes 
of  climate  in  the  Arctic  Ocean.  They  did  not  find  it  easy  to 
explain  all  these  changes.  They  may  all  be  explained,  how- 
ever, by  the  hypothesis  of  two  displacements  of  the  earth's 
crust. 

The  period  begins  with  a  very  cold  phase.  Since  the  cores 
go  back  only  50,000  years,  we  do  not  know  when  the  cold 
period  began.  The  scientists  remark: 

It  seems  that  in  the  period  in  question,  a  considerable  part  of  the 
Arctic  shelf  was  dry;  ther£  was  no,  or  almost  no,  communication  with 
the  Atlantic.  The  climate  was  cold  (364:9). 

According  to  the  principles  already  set  forth  (Chapter  IV), 
a  pole  in  southern  Greenland  might  be  expected  to  have 
coincided  with  higher  elevation  of  that  general  region,  in- 
cluding the  adjacent  sea  bottoms.  The  continental  shelves 
in  that  part  of  the  Arctic  Ocean  facing  toward  Scandinavia 
might  well  have  been  raised  above  sea  level.  There  might 
well  have  been  a  land  connection  between  Greenland  and 
Iceland,  and  even  across  the  narrow  North  Atlantic  to  Scan- 
dinavia. The  Soviet  scientists  themselves  strongly  suggest 
that  this  land  connection  must  have  existed;  nor  are  they 
alone  in  their  suggestion.  Years  ago  Humphreys  advanced  the 
idea.  More  recently  Malaise  has  produced  much  new  evi- 
dence for  it  (2 91  a).  Thus  it  is  evident  that  our  theory  has 
started  out  pretty  well,  by  explaining  why  there  was  little 
communication  between  the  two  oceans.  The  interruption, 
however,  was  not  simply  the  result  of  land  masses  in  the 
North  Atlantic.  It  could  also  have  been  the  result  of  having 
a  polar  area  lying  right  across  the  connections  between  the 


286  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

Arctic  and  the  North  Atlantic.  A  glance  at  the  globe  will 
make  this  clear. 

Beginning  50,000  years  ago,  and  lasting  for  about  5,000 
years,  there  was,  according  to  the  Soviet  scientists,  a  brief 
warm  spell  in  the  Arctic  Ocean: 

.  .  .  The  bottom  sediments  became  finer;  argillaceous  and  highly 
argillaceous  oozes  began  to  be  deposited,  of  a  brown  or  here  and 
there  dark  brown  color,  with  increased  contents  of  iron  oxides,  man- 
ganese, and  foraminiferous  micro-fauna  (364:9). 

This  warm  period  may  reflect  the  movement  of  the  crust 
that  resulted  in  withdrawal  of  the  pole  from  Greenland  and 
its  shift  toward  Hudson  Bay.  It  is  followed,  however,  by  a 
cold  period  in  the  Arctic  from  45,000  to  28-32,000  years  ago. 
This  following  cold  period  is  explained,  according  to  our 
theory,  by  the  beginning  of  the  subsidence  of  the  land  bridge, 
which  may  have  opened  a  water  connection  between  the  two 
oceans.  The  pole  was  at  this  time  still  near  the  Atlantic,  and 
very  cold  Atlantic  water  was  thus  able  to  pour  into  the 
warmer  Arctic.  The  subsidence  of  the  land  bridge  as  the  pole 
moved  away  is,  of  course,  a  corollary  of  our  theory.  Such  a 
subsidence  in  any  area  moving  away  from  a  pole  would  posi- 
tively have  to  occur,  unless  counteracted  locally  by  the  reloca- 
tion at  particular  points  under  the  crust  of  lighter  rock  de- 
tached from  the  underside  of  the  crust  elsewhere. 

Following  this  cold  period  in  the  Arctic,  we  come  to  a 
most  remarkable  change,  one  which,  in  my  opinion,  provides 
an  unusually  impressive  confirmation  of  our  assumption  of 
the  location  of  the  Hudson  Bay  region  at  the  pole.  About 
28-32,000  years  ago,  a  really  warm  period  began  in  the 
Arctic,  and  lasted  until  18,000  to  20,000  years  ago.  The 
Soviet  scientists  have  found  that  during  this  period  there  was 
a  rich  development  of  temperate-type  microfauna  in  the 
Arctic,  though  their  explanation  is  very  different  from  ours: 

.  .  .  The  luxuriant  development  of  a  foraminiferal  fauna  of  North 
Atlantic  type  testifies  that  during  this  period  warm  Atlantic  waters 
were  invading  the  Arctic  Basin  on  a  broad  front;  that  is,  communica- 
tion between  the  Arctic  Basin  and  the  Atlantic  Ocean,  which  had 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  287 

apparently  been  interrupted  in  the  previous  period,  was  reestablished. 
The  duration  of  the  warm  period  has  been  set  at  approximately  ten 
to  twelve  thousand  years  (364:11). 

According  to  our  interpretation,  this  luxuriant  develop- 
ment of  microorganisms  of  temperate  type  in  the  Arctic 
Ocean  marks  the  movement  of  the  pole  into  the  interior  of 
North  America,  and  away  from  the  Atlantic.  This  movement 
must  have  initiated  a  temperate  period  in  all  that  half  of  the 
Arctic  Ocean  facing  Scandinavia  and  Siberia.  Again,  a  glance 
at  the  globe  will  make  this  clear.  The  reader  cannot  fail  to 
see  that  with  the  pole  in  Hudson  Bay,  the  Arctic  and  the 
Atlantic  Oceans  would  lie  on  the  same  temperate  parallel  of 
latitude. 

This  indication  of  temperate  conditions  in  the  Arctic 
gains  enormously  in  significance  when  considered  in  connec- 
tion with  the  evidence  of  the  Ross  Sea  cores  for  the  same 
period  in  Antarctica.  It  seems  that  here  we  have  evidence  of 
warm  periods  near  both  the  present  poles.  Yet,  obviously,  it 
is  impossible  to  claim  that  the  whole  earth  was  warmer  at  the 
time,  because  of  the  evidence  of  widespread  glacial  condi- 
tions in  both  North  America  and  Europe.  It  seems  to  me 
that  a  reasonable  person  is  forced  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
crust  shifted. 

b.  Earlier  Phases  of  the  Wisconsin  Glaciation 

Let  us  briefly  reconstruct  the  history  of  the  crust  displace- 
ment that  resulted  in  the  shift  of  the  polar  location  from 
Greenland  to  Hudson  Bay.  This  will  explain  the  earlier, 
unknown  phase  of  the  Wisconsin  glaciation.  As  has  been 
pointed  out,  the  earliest  known  phase  of  that  glaciation  is  the 
Farmdale,  only  25,000  years  ago.  Despite  this  fact,  very  many 
pieces  of  wood  and  other  remains  from  glacial  deposits  in 
North  America  have  been  found  to  be  much  older  than  that. 
As  already  mentioned,  Flint  was  led  by  this  evidence  to  sug- 
gest that  there  must  have  been  earlier  glacial  advances,  the 
evidences  of  which  were  later  destroyed.  It  has  been  shown 


288  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

that  the  Mankato  Advance  of  the  ice  sheet  occurred  only 
1 1,000  years  ago,  and  yet  some  deposits  of  Mankato  age  con- 
tain pieces  of  wood  that  have  been  found  to  be  more  than 
30,000  years  old.  These  must  have  been  included  originally 
in  older  glacial  deposits. 

Our  theory  may  explain  not  only  the  earlier  phases  of  the 
Wisconsin  glaciation  but  also  why  most  of  their  traces  were 
destroyed.  Let  us  assume  that  50,000  years  ago  the  previous 
crust  displacement  started  shifting  the  pole  from  southern 
Greenland  toward  Hudson  Bay.  This  would  have  started  an 
expansion  of  glaciation  in  North  America,  with  the  ice  mov- 
ing toward  the  west  and  south.  We  must  visualize  a  gradual 
lowering  of  the  temperature  over  a  period  of  several  thousand 
years,  with  those  sudden  changes  resulting  from  volcanism 
with  which  we  are  already  familiar.  In  this  case,  instead  of 
each  advance  of  the  icecap  falling  short,  at  least  in  some 
places,  of  the  preceding  advances,  so  as  to  leave  traces  in  the 
form  of  undisturbed  moraines,  the  contrary  happened.  As  the 
crust  moved,  the  pole  was  steadily  advancing  from  the  north- 
east, and  therefore  each  phase  of  expansion  of  the  ice  sheet 
would  naturally  carry  the  ice  front  farther  than  the  one  be- 
fore, plowing  up  and  destroying  the  evidences  of  earlier 
phases,  obliterating  the  record  and  incorporating  the  older 
glacial  material  with  its  own  debris.  Not  until  the  climax  of 
the  glaciation  was  reached,  with  the  Farmdale  Advance,  did 
a  change  in  this  situation  occur.  The  date  of  this  advance, 
therefore,  may  have  been  the  time  when  the  Hudson  Bay 
region  reached  the  pole  and  the  crust  ceased  to  move. 


</.  Greenland  at  the  Pole 

Several  impressive  lines  of  evidence  are  in  accord  with  the 
assumption  of  the  location  of  the  general  region  of  southern 
Greenland  at  the  pole  before  the  time  when  the  Hudson  Bay 
region  may  have  been  located  there.  In  considering  these 
lines  of  evidence,  we  shall  assume  that  the  period  during 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS    OF    CRUST  289 

which  Greenland  was  at  the  pole  was  of  the  order  of  30,000 
or  40,000  years,  or  that  it  was  roughly  comparable  in  length 
to  the  period  when  Hudson  Bay  lay  at  the  pole.  This  will 
carry  us  back,  therefore,  about  90,000  years. 

The  assumption  of  a  pole  in  southern  Greenland  seems 
able  to  solve  a  remarkable  number  of  climatic  problems  per- 
taining to  various  parts  of  the  world.  In  the  first  place,  it  can 
explain  the  evidence  that  indicates  that  the  glacial  period  in 
Europe  began  earlier  than  the  Wisconsin  glaciation.  It  is 
consistent  with  the  existence  in  New  York  State  of  the  tem- 
perate fauna  and  flora  which  we  saw  were  enclosed  in  the 
Wisconsin  ice  sheet.  It  would  explain,  as  nothing  else  has 
explained,  why  the  massive  European  ice  sheet  advanced 
southward  only  as  far  as  the  5oth  parallel  of  latitude,  while 
in  North  America  the  Wisconsin  icecap  extended  southward 
to  the  4oth.  A  glance  at  the  globe  will  be  sufficient  to  show 
the  reader  the  truth  of  this.  In  addition,  this  position  of  the 
pole  will  explain  two  different  problems  in  Antarctica.  On 
the  om  .and,  in  many  parts  of  Antarctica,  as  already  men- 
tioned, there  are  glacial  striations  above  the  present  level  of 
the  ice,  indicating  that  a  thicker  ice  sheet  once  existed  in 
those  areas;  on  the  other  hand,  the  Ross  Sea  core  N— 4  (see 
Figure  XI,  p.  306)  indicates  temperate-type  sediment  on  the 
bottom  of  the  Ross  Sea  from  about  65,000  to  about  80,000 
years  ago.  Now  this  continuous  deposition  of  temperate  sedi- 
ment on  the  bottom  of  the  Ross  Sea  for  nearly  20,000  years 
is  very  difficult  to  explain.  It  quite  obviously  cannot  be  ex- 
plained at  all  in  terms  of  the  present  position  of  the  pole. 

If  the  reader  will  turn  to  the  map  of  Antarctica  (p.  276)  on 
which  I  have  indicated  the  various  positions  of  the  South 
Pole  corresponding  to  our  Hudson  Bay,  Greenland,  and 
Alaskan  North  Poles,  he  will  note  that  a  South  Pole  corre- 
sponding to  our  Greenland  North  Pole  would  imply  a 
thicker  ice  sheet  than  now  in  some  parts  of  Antarctica.  So 
far  as  the  Ross  Sea  is  concerned,  an  interesting  situation 
emerges.  It  seems  probable  that  the  side  of  the  Ross  Sea  near- 
est this  former  South  Pole  would  be  glacial,  while  the  other 


290  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

side  may  have  been  nonglacial.  Thus  sediment  of  both  kinds 
could  be  deposited  in  different  parts  of  the  Ross  Sea  at  the 
same  time,  depending,  perhaps,  to  some  extent,  on  the  local 
peculiarities  of  bottom  topography  and  bottom  currents.  It 
cannot  be  assumed,  of  course,  that  the  outlines  of  the  conti- 
nent, or  the  depths  of  the  surrounding  oceans,  were  the  same 
at  that  time  as  they  are  now.  However,  those  who  may  still 
be  inclined  to  discount  the  theory  presented  in  this  book 
must  be  reminded  that  all  the  phenomena  discussed  in  this 
chapter— and  all  the  principal  phenomena  discussed  in  this 
book— have  been  hitherto  unexplained.  It  is  not  a  question 
of  choosing  between  explanations.  There  is,  at  the  present 
time,  no  other  explanation  than  ours  of  these  facts. 

a.  Cores  from  the  San  Augustin  Plains 

A  good  deal  of  evidence  from  other  cores  supports  this  suc- 
cession of  polar  positions  in  Greenland  and  Hudson  Bay. 
Let  us  consider  first  a  very  interesting  study  recently  made  in 
New  Mexico.  There  a  group  of  scientists  have  been  studying 
a  very  long  sedimentary  core  taken  from  the  San  Augustin 
Plains.  On  these  plains,  sediments  have  accumulated  to  a 
great  depth  without  consolidating  into  rock,  so  it  has  been 
possible  to  bore  down  about  645  feet  and  get  a  cross  section 
of  all  the  deposits  to  that  depth.  These  sediments  contain 
pollen  of  various  trees  and  plants,  which,  as  is  well  known, 
does  not  easily  disintegrate,  but  remains  preserved  in  the  soil 
for  very  long  periods.  In  this  core,  different  kinds  of  pollen 
in  the  different  layers  indicated  changes  in  the  species  of  trees 
and  plants  growing  in  the  region,  and  of  course  changes  in 
the  kinds  of  plants  growing  in  a  region  indicate  changes  of 
climate.  For  the  upper  and  most  recent  part  of  the  core,  it 
was  possible  to  use  the  radiocarbon  method  to  date  the 
changes  in  pollen  types,  and  therefore  in  climate. 

Figure  VIII  (opposite  page),  prepared  by  Drs.  Clisby  and 
Sears  (84),  shows  the  climatic  curve  for  the  upper  330  feet 
of  the  core.  The  radiocarbon  date  at  27,000  years  ago  plus 


POLLEN  PERCENTAGE 


SAND— > 


10     20     30    40    50     60     70    80    90    100 


4-19,000*  1,600 

,  0  00  *  5,000-  3,200 


K          DESERT 

I-  VCHENOPODIACEAE 


Fig.  VIII.    Pollen  Profile  from  the  San  Augustin  Plains,  New  Mexico 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

5,000  or  minus  3,200  years  (an  unusually  large  margin  of 
error)  indicates  glacial  conditions  at  that  time,  and  a  rough 
extrapolation  based  on  the  rate  of  sedimentation  indicated 
for  the  dated  part  of  the  core  would  indicate  that  glacial  con- 
ditions began  in  New  Mexico  not  more  than  about  40,000 
years  ago.  A  most  remarkable  thing  about  this  core  is  that  it 
indicates  temperate  conditions  from  this  point  all  the  way 
down  to  the  bottom.  When  it  is  considered  that  the  older  sec- 
tion dated  by  radiocarbon,  about  27,000  years  old,  was  only 
28  feet  down  in  the  core,  it  is  evident  that  the  core  covers  a 
very  long  time. 

This  climatic  record  has  some  very  important  implications 
for  us.  It  appears  to  show,  for  one  thing,  that  the  glacial 
period  in  North  America  generally  did  not  extend  back  as  far 
as  the  glacial  period  appears  to  have  done  in  the  North  At- 
lantic and  in  Europe.  It  seems  to  show,  unmistakably,  that 
the  so-called  Sangamon  Interglacial  continued  without  a 
break,  down  to  about  40,000  years  ago,  at  least  in  western 
North  America.  Thus,  it  implies  that  the  Sangamon  Inter- 
glacial  in  North  America  was  contemporary  with  the  earlier 
part  of  the  Wiirm  glaciation  in  Europe.  This  is  a  remarkable 
state  of  affairs,  and  appears  to  dispose  irrevocably  of  the  doc- 
trine of  the  simultaneousness  of  glaciations.  Incidentally,  it 
provides  confirmation  of  climatic  conditions  in  New  York 
State  suitable  for  the  mastodons  and  other  animals  that  lived 
there  before  the  growth  of  the  Wisconsin  icecap.  It  is  there- 
fore in  agreement  with  our  assumption  of  a  pole  in  southern 
Greenland.  This  core,  the  data  considered  above  from  North 
America  and  the  Arctic,  and  the  Antarctic  cores  give  us  a  tri- 
angulation  that  provides  extraordinarily  strong  confirmation 
of  the  theory. 

There  is  one  factor,  however,  that  may  enter  into  the  inter- 
pretation of  this  San  Augustin  core,  which  could  invalidate  our 
conclusions.  The  plains  are  now  at  an  elevation  of  7,000  feet 
above  sea  level.  The  earlier  chapters  of  this  book  have  ex- 
plained how  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  may  cause 
major  changes  in  land  elevations.  A  change  in  land  elevation 


EARLIER     DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  2Q3 

would,  of  course,  affect  the  climate  and  therefore  the  vegeta- 
tion growing  in  an  area.  It  is  generally  considered  that  1,000 
feet  in  elevation  is  the  equivalent  of  about  eight  hundred 
miles  in  latitude,  so  far  as  plant  habitats  are  concerned.  We 
therefore  have  to  take  into  consideration  the  possible  effect 
of  an  uplift  of  the  plains  during  the  time  that  the  sediments 
were  accumulating.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  645  feet  of 
sediments  may  easily  embrace  a  total  period  of  time  exceed- 
ing a  million  years,  or  the  length  of  the  whole  Pleistocene 
Epoch,  and  since  we  have  evidence  that  there  were  a  number 
of  ice  ages  in  North  America  during  the  Pleistocene,  before 
the  Wisconsin  glaciation,  we  may  be  forced  to  assume  that 
there  was  a  considerable  uplift  of  the  plains  during  the 
Pleistocene.  However,  it  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that  during 
the  comparatively  short  period  we  are  now  discussing— the 
period  from  about  40,000  to  about  90,000  years  ago— the  up- 
lift may  not  have  been  of  major  proportions. 

Our  Greenland  pole  is  supported  by  other  lines  of  evi- 
dence. In  evaluating  them,  however,  we  shall  have  to  take 
into  consideration  the  still  earlier  hypothetical  position  of 
Alaska  at  the  pole. 

b.  Some  North  Atlantic  Cores 

A  number  of  cores  have  been  taken  in  the  North  Atlantic, 
and  dated  by  the  new  methods  of  absolute  dating.  Despite 
the  fact  that  these  cores  were  obtained  independently  by 
different  scientists,  and  dated  by  different  methods,  we  shall 
find  that  they  agree  well,  and  that  they  support  our  basic 
assumptions. 

The  cores  to  be  considered  include  three  taken  from  the 
North  Atlantic  in  about  Lat.  46-49°  N.,  and  dated  by  the 
ionium  method,  and  three  cores  from  the  Caribbean  and 
the  Equatorial  Atlantic. 

The  last  three  cores  were  prepared  by  Ericson,  who  ana- 
lyzed their  enclosed  foraminiferal  remains  for  evidence  of 
climatic  change.  They  were  subjected  to  radiocarbon  tests  by 


294  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

the  United  States  Geological  Survey.  They  were  also  studied 
by  Dr.  Cesare  Emiliani,  who  used  a  technique  developed  by 
Dr.  Harold  C.  Urey  for  determining  ancient  water  tempera- 
tures. This  technique  makes  use  of  an  isotope  of  oxygen 
(Oi8)  the  proportion  of  which  in  sea  water  is  affected  by 
temperature.  The  temperature  of  the  water  at  which  ancient 
shells  grew  (or,  in  this  case,  at  which  foraminiferal  micro- 
organisms grew)  can  be  determined  by  the  proportion  of 
Ois  in  the  remains.  This  determination  is  independent  of 
time,  and  the  temperature  at  which  a  shell  grew  200,000,000 
years  ago  (but  not  the  date)  can  be  determined  just  as  well 
as  if  the  shell  grew  last  year.  Emiliani  used  this  technique  to 
establish  temperature  curves  for  the  sedimentary  cores  for 
the  period  within  the  range  of  radiocarbon.  Then,  using  this 
as  a  base,  he  extrapolated  to  the  older  parts  of  the  cores. 
There  is  reasonably  good  agreement  between  temperature 
curves  arrived  at  in  this  way  and  those  obtained  by  the 
ionium  method. 

Of  the  three  cores  taken  from  the  North  Atlantic  and 
dated  by  the  ionium  method,  one  extends  back  to  only  1 1,800 
years  ago,  one  to  24,300,  and  one  to  72,500.  The  longest  core 
will  have  the  greatest  interest  for  us  (Figure  IX). 

Core  P- 12  6(5)  was  taken  in  mid- Atlantic,  approximately  at 
the  latitude  of  Nova  Scotia,  in  about  three  miles  of  water. 
Since  it  extends  back  to  72,500  years  ago,  it  should  be  able 
to  throw  some  light  on  the  question  of  our  assumed  polar 
positions,  including  the  Alaskan. 

The  story  of  this  core,  as  we  recede  into  the  past,  is  as 
follows:  There  is  first  a  layer  of  volcanic  glass  shards,  dated 
about  12,800  years  ago,  then  a  layer  of  nonglacial  sediment, 
then  glacial  sediment  from  14,700  to  23,700  years  ago,  then 
nonglacial  sediment  but  with  evidence  of  cold  water,  back 
to  60,700  years  ago.  This  period  of  cold  water  is  interrupted 
by  three  brief  intervals  of  glacial  deposition,  by  two  layers  of 
confused  ("anomalous")  sediments,  and  by  a  layer  of  volcanic 
glass  shards  between  51,400  and  55,400  years  ago.  Then,  be- 
tween 60,700  and  68,000  years  ago,  the  North  Atlantic  water 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST 

P-130  (9) 


P-124  C3) 


P-126  (5) 


300 


800 


NAUTICAL    MILES 


Fig.  IX.    Chronology  of  Sediments  in  the  North  Atlantic  Cores  P- 124(3), 
P-i*6(5),  P-iso(9) 

gets  warmer,  until  it  becomes  definitely  warmer  than  it  is 
today.  The  warm  period  continues  to  the  bottom  of  the  core. 
This  core  raises  some  enormously  interesting  questions. 
In  the  first  place,  it  indicates  very  cold  conditions,  much 
colder  than  the  present,  in  the  North  Atlantic  back  to  about 
62,000  years  ago,  and  we  must  ask,  How  can  this  be  recon- 
ciled with  the  indications  of  a  climate  like  the  present  on 
the  San  Augustin  Plains  for  the  same  period?  We  shall  see 
that  the  other  cores,  from  the  Caribbean  and  the  Equatorial 
Atlantic,  will  intensify  this  contradiction,  for  they  confirm 
the  cold  climate  in  the  Atlantic.  These  cores  constitute  evi- 
dence for  a  pole  in  the  Greenland  region. 


296  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

A  second  vital  question  raised  by  the  core  is  the  existence 
of  a  warm  North  Atlantic  70,000  years  ago:  the  foraminiferal 
studies  made  in  connection  with  this  core  show  that  the 
North  Atlantic  was  warmer  then  than  now.  There  has  been 
no  explanation  of  this,  yet  obviously  it  is  enormously  im- 
portant. It  may  be  explained  by  a  polar  position  in  the 
Alaskan  region.  We  will  return  to  this  question  in  connec- 
tion with  the  other  evidences  for  the  location  at  that  time 
of  Alaska  at  the  pole. 

Deposits  of  volcanic  glass  shards  are  not,  from  our  point  of 
view,  something  to  be  passed  over  without  remark,  especially 
when,  as  in  this  case,  the  deposits  relate  themselves  remark- 
ably well  to  critical  phases  of  our  assumed  crust  displace- 
ments. The  last  such  deposit  agrees  in  time  with  the  Gary 
Advance  of  the  Wisconsin  ice  sheet,  and  may  be  considered 
as  possible  evidence  of  the  intense  volcanism  that  may  have 
accompanied  and,  indeed,  caused  that  glacial  advance.  The 
older  band  of  volcanic  shards  also  apparently  coincides  with 
a  time  of  great  change,  as  indicated  by  the  Arctic  cores  al- 
ready discussed.  That  was  the  time  when,  according  to  our 
theory,  the  displacement  started  that  was  to  shift  Greenland 
from,  and  Hudson  Bay  to,  the  pole. 

It  appears  to  me  that  the  dating  of  the  brief  intervals  of 
glacial  deposition  also  has  significance.  For  example,  a  brief 
interval  of  glacial  deposition  between  50,000  and  51,200 
years  ago  immediately  follows  the  deposition  of  volcanic  glass 
shards,  which  according  to  our  theory  can  have  represented  a 
period  of  massive  volcanism,  which  may  have  acted  as  the 
direct  cause  of  the  glacial  advance,  which,  in  turn,  may  have 
led  to  the  deposition  of  the  glacial  sediment  in  the  sea.  Of 
course  the  finding  of  volcanic  debris  and  glacial  sediment  in 
sequence  in  the  same  core  is  an  accident  in  one  sense,  for  a 
prolonged  episode  of  massive  volcanism  anywhere  else  on 
the  surface  of  the  earth  would  have  produced  the  advance  of 
glaciers  adjacent  to  the  Atlantic.  During  any  movement  of 
the  crust,  we  may  assume  that  volcanism  would  be  very  active 
in  many  parts  of  the  earth,  and  not  necessarily  in  the  immedi- 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  2Q7 

ate  neighborhoods  of  the  ice  sheets.  The  oldest  episode  of 
glacial  deposition,  about  60,000  years  ago,  coincides  closely 
with  the  time  that  we  have  assigned  hypothetically  for  the 
maximum  of  the  Greenland  glaciation. 

A  serious  problem  is  presented  by  the  fact  that  the  sedi- 
ment deposited  in  the  North  Atlantic  during  the  period  from 
23,700  to  about  60,000  years  ago  is  not  actually  glacial  except 
for  brief  episodes.  How  can  this  be  accounted  for  if  we  are 
to  assume  a  pole  in  Greenland?  For  that  matter,  how  can  it 
be  accounted  for  if  we  are  to  extend  the  Wurm  glaciation  in 
Europe  back  as  far  as  the  European  geologists  seem  to  de- 
mand? 

It  is  obvious,  from  the  brief  recurrent  episodes  of  glacial 
deposition,  that  somewhere  an  ice  sheet  or  ice  sheets  lay  near 
the  coasts,  so  situated  that  when  expanded  in  the  brief 
periods  of  greater  cold  brought  on  by  massive  volcanism,  one 
or  more  ice  sheets  reached  the  sea.  It  may  be  necessary  to 
consider  that  the  pole  in  Greenland  may  not  have  been  very 
near  the  sea  at  that  time,  and,  as  I  have  already  suggested,  a 
number  of  authorities  are  now  receptive  to  the  idea  of  a  land 
connection  across  the  North  Atlantic. 

c.  A  North  Atlantic  Land  Mass? 

This,  in  turn,  produces  another  problem.  If  there  was  a  land 
connection  across  the  North  Atlantic,  and  if  the  pole  was  in 
southern  Greenland,  would  not  the  continental  ice  sheet 
have  entered  the  British  Isles  from  the  northwest,  instead 
of  from  the  northeast,  from  the  direction  of  Scandinavia? 
Strangely  enough,  a  very  persuasive  book  has  been  written 
by  Forrest  (164)  to  sustain  precisely  this  thesis.  I  have  spent 
considerable  time  checking  his  sources.  I  have  gone  through 
many  of  the  original  reports  he  used,  including  numerous 
field  reports  published  by  the  British  Association  for  the 
Advancement  of  Science,  the  Liverpool  Geological  Society, 
and  other  British  geological  societies.  I  have  also  checked 
secondary  works  by  various  British  geologists.  As  a  result  I 


298  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

have  found  an  impressive  mass  of  reliable  direct  field  ob- 
servation indicating  that  the  original  direction  of  the  ice 
invasion  of  the  British  Isles,  in  the  earlier  part  of  the  ice  age, 
was  from  the  northwest.  In  most  areas  the  evidences  of  the 
movement  were  later  overlaid  or  destroyed  by  the  Scandi- 
navian ice  sheet,  or  by  local  glaciers. 

In  reviewing  the  field  reports,  and  later  the  general  geolog- 
ical works  that  used  the  reports  as  source  material,  I  have 
noticed  a  most  interesting  phenomenon.  Field  observers 
quite  often  remarked  on  the  northwest-southeast  directions 
of  certain  glacial  striations,  on  associated  glacial  evidences 
showing  clearly  that  the  ice  moved  from  the  northwest 
toward  the  southeast,  and  on  evidence  that  the  ice  sheet 
swept  over  the  tops  of  most  of  the  mountains  of  Ireland, 
Wales,  and  Scotland,  often  across  the  axes  of  the  valleys,  and 
from  the  northwest.  But  as  the  discussion  of  the  subject  was 
removed  from  direct  contact  with  the  field,  and  as  the  field 
reports  were  condensed,  abstracted,  and  interpreted,  this  evi- 
dence of  ice  movement  from  the  northwest  became  more  and 
more  subordinated,  and,  finally,  was  lost  to  view.  The  reason 
for  this  is  quite  simple.  The  geologists  were  firmly  convinced 
that  the  ice  sheet  could  have  come  only  from  Scandinavia. 
An  ice  center  in  the  North  Atlantic,  involving  former  land 
areas  in  that  region,  was  quite  unthinkable.  This  was  a 
natural  consequence  of  the  general  acceptance  of  the  theory 
of  the  permanence  of  continents.  Various  ingenious  solutions 
of  the  problem  were  suggested.  Charlesworth  pointed  out  that 
a  westward-trending  valley  could  turn  an  ice  sheet  descend- 
ing from  the  British  highlands  westward,  and  it  might  fan 
out  on  the  coastal  plain,  so  that  its  northern  flank  would  actu- 
ally be  moving  toward  the  northwest.  Other  geologists  have 
stressed  glaciers  expanding  in  all  directions  from  elevated 
areas  in  Britain.  The  awkward  thing  is  that  precisely  what 
these  people  assert  happened  probably  did  happen,  but  in 
the  later  part  of  the  ice  age,  when  the  North  Atlantic  ice 
center  was  gone,  the  Scandinavian  glacier  lay  along  the  east 
coast  of  Britain,  and  local  valley  glaciers  occupied  the  in- 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST 

terior.  Nobody,  however,  has  properly  examined  the  data 
cited  by  Forrest  as  his  principal  line  of  evidence. 

Recently  Kolbe  and  Malaise  have  produced  evidence  that 
may  cause  many  to  turn  to  the  work  of  Forrest  with  new 
interest.  From  the  evidence  of  fresh-water  diatoms  indicating 
a  former  fresh-water  lake  on  the  mid-Atlantic  ridge,  now 
about  two  miles  below  the  surface  of  the  ocean,  and  from  the 
study  of  the  differing  sediments  deposited  on  the  two  sides 
of  the  ridge,  Malaise  reaches  the  conclusion  that  the  mid- 
Atlantic  range  was  above  sea  level  until  the  end  of  the  Pleis- 
tocene (2gia:207). 

Unfortunately,  limitations  of  space  must  prevent  further 
discussion  of  this  question.  I  can  only  refer  the  reader  to  the 
works  cited  and  to  Forrest's  original  sources.  Forrest  has 
made  a  few  mistakes  in  discussing  matters  dealing  with  ice 
sheets,  but  he  himself  calls  attention  to  the  fact  that  he  was 
trained  as  a  zoologist,  not  a  geologist.  However,  his  errors  are 
not  such  as  to  affect  the  validity  of  his  argument.  The  prin- 
cipal weakness  of  his  book  is  that  he  does  not  present  the 
evidence  in  sufficient  detail,  so  that  it  is  necessary  to  refer  to 
the  original  sources. 

It  is  possible  that  the  displacement  of  the  crust  that  re- 
sulted in  the  movement  of  the  pole  from  Alaska  to  Green- 
land may  itself  have  raised  the  North  Atlantic  bpttom  enough 
to  bring  a  transatlantic  land  connection,  in  the  manner  sug- 
gested in  Chapter  IV,  and  that  in  consequence  the  Greenland 
ice  sheet  may  have  travelled  along  the  land  bridge  into 
Britain.  The  subsequent  displacement  that  shifted  the  pole 
toward  Hudson  Bay  could  have  brought  about  the  resub- 
mergence  of  parts  of  the  land  bridge,  and  have  resulted  in  the 
destruction  of  the  Greenland  continental  glacier.  The  final 
movement  of  the  pole  to  its  present  location  could  have  re- 
sulted in  the  submergence  of  the  remnants  of  the  land  bridge. 

The  advantage  of  our  hypothesis  is  that  it  seems  able  to 
suggest  both  the  cause  of  the  creation  of  a  land  connection 
across  the  North  Atlantic,  and  the  cause  of  its  disappearance. 
The  fact  that  we  have  here  two  successive  displacements  of 


joo  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

the  crust  helps  us  to  account  for  the  total  amount  of  the 
submergence.  Each  of  these  hypothetical  movements  would 
have  shifted  the  North  Atlantic  nearer  the  equator,  and 
therefore,  according  to  the  theory,  would  have  favored  sub- 
sidence of  land  area  relatively  to  sea  level.  The  evidence  of 
very  widespread  volcanism  in  the  whole  basin  of  the  North 
Atlantic  during  the  ice  age  (174)  carries  the  implication, 
also,  that  invasion  of  the  lower  parts  of  the  crust  by  molten 
magma  of  high  density  could  have  weighted  and  depressed 
the  area,  in  the  manner  suggested  earlier  (Chapter  VI). 

d.  Additional  Atlantic  Cores 

To  return  to  our  Atlantic  cores,  a  rather  interesting  point 
about  Core  P~i26(5)  is  that  the  deposition  of  glacial  sedi- 
ment ceased  about  14,000  years  ago.  It  may  be  noticed,  how- 
ever, that  in  another  of  the  Urry  cores,  P-i3o(g),  which  was 
taken  much  farther  to  the  east,  the  deposition  of  glacial  sedi- 
ment ceased  1 8,000  years  ago.  One  might  at  first  be  inclined 
to  pass  this  over  as  an  unimportant  detail,  until  one  realized 
that  with  Hudson  Bay  at  the  pole  the  difference  is  com- 
pletely explained.  Under  those  circumstances,  the  second 
core,  which  now  lies  to  the  east,  would  have  been  due  south 
of  the  first  core,  and  it  would  be  entirely  natural  that  the 
warming  of  the  climate  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age  would  be 
felt  first  in  the  more  southerly  region.  This,  then,  constitutes 
additional  evidence  for  the  location  of  the  Hudson  Bay 
region  at  the  pole  during  the  period  of  the  Wisconsin  glacia- 
tion. 

We  have  still  to  consider  the  Ericson-Suess-Emiliani  At- 
lantic cores.  I  reproduce,  below,  Suess's  graph  of  the  tempera- 
ture changes  in  the  Atlantic  for  the  last  100,000  years,  as 
evidenced  by  these  cores. 

Now,  to  begin  with,  we  note  that  according  to  these  cores 
the  temperature  of  the  Atlantic  Ocean  was  at  a  peak  between 
75,000  and  about  98,000  years  ago;  this  agrees  substantially 
with  the  Urry  core  already  discussed,  but  extends  the  warm 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST 


40  50 

1000   YEARS  - 


60 


70 


eo 


90 


Fig.  X.     North  Atlantic  Cores  A  172-6,  A  199-4,  A  180-75 

period  back  to  about  100,000  years  ago.  We  will  assume  that 
this  warm  phase  in  the  Atlantic  represents  the  period,  or  at 
least  the  latter  part  of  the  period,  when  Alaska  was  at  the 
pole. 

We  note,  too,  that  the  temperature  in  the  Atlantic  during 
this  warm  period  was  not,  at  the  sites  of  these  cores,  as  high 
as  the  temperatures  now  prevailing  there,  except  for  two 
very  brief  spurts  in  Cores  A  180-75  and  A  179-4.  Yet  we 
have  seen  that  the  Urry  core  P- 12 6(5)  indicated  clearly  that 
the  water  was  warmer  at  that  time  than  it  is  at  present.  How 
is  this  conflict  to  be  solved?  Shall  we  be  forced  to  discredit 
the  reliability  of  one  finding  or  the  other?  Not  at  all.  Our 
theory  offers  the  possibility  of  eliminating  this  apparent  con- 
tradiction in  the  evidence. 

Let  us  consider  the  present  and  past  latitudes  of  these 
cores.  P-i26(5)  was  taken  in  about  the  latitude  of  St.  John's, 
Newfoundland;  the  others  were  taken  in  very  low  latitudes. 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

If  we  assume  that  Alaska  was  at  the  pole  during  this  warm 
period  in  the  Atlantic,  the  site  of  this  core  would  then  have 
been  farther  from  the  pole  than  it  is  now;  that  is,  it  would 
have  been  south  of  its  present  latitude.  Quite  naturally  the 
water  would  have  been  warmer.  A  glance  at  the  globe  will 
suffice  to  make  this  plain. 

On  the  other  hand,  if  we  now  consider  Core  A  180-75, 
taken  in  the  eastern  Equatorial  Atlantic,  nearly  on  the 
equator,  the  opposite  situation  is  revealed.  A  pole  in  Alaska 
would  displace  this  core  southward  from  the  equator,  pos- 
sibly as  far  as  the  2Oth  parallel  of  South  Latitude  (depending, 
of  course,  on  the  precise  location  of  the  pole  in  Alaska). 
Quite  probably,  the  water  would  be  colder  then  than  it  is  at 
present,  other  things  being  equal. 

The  two  Caribbean  cores  would,  with  the  Alaskan  pole, 
have  had  approximately  the  same  latitude  as  at  present;  the 
uncertainty  as  to  the  precise  location  of  that  pole  makes  it 
impossible  to  draw  any  reliable  conclusions  from  them. 

Both  the  Caribbean  cores  indicate  a  temperature  mini- 
mum about  55,000  years  ago,  which  would  correspond  well 
with  the  date  we  have  tentatively  assigned  for  the  arrival  of 
Greenland  at  the  pole;  they  both  show  the  temporary  warm 
period  that  was  shown  in  the  Arctic  cores,  which  we  have 
interpreted  as  marking  the  breakup  of  the  Greenland  conti- 
nental icecap.  They  then  show  a  gradual  temperature  decline 
from  about  40,000  to  about  1 1,000  years  ago,  which  may  cor- 
respond, first,  to  the  growth  of  the  Wisconsin  continental 
icecap  and,  finally,  to  the  movement  of  the  ice  center  of  that 
icecap  eastward  into  Labrador  during  the  declining  phases  of 
the  glaciation. 

At  this  point  it  is  important  to  consider  a  contradiction 
between  the  Caribbean  cores  and  the  core  from  the  eastern 
Atlantic.  It  appears  that  the  ocean  temperature  reached  its 
minimum,  after  the  early  warm  period,  in  the  eastern  At- 
lantic about  20,000  years  before  it  did  in  the  Caribbean. 
This  is  a  very  important  difference.  How  is  it  to  be  ex- 
plained? 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF    CRUST 

It  appears  that  this  anomalous  fact  may  constitute,  in  it- 
self, one  of  the  most  impressive  confirmations  of  the  whole 
theory  of  displacements  of  the  crust,  for,  if  you  look  at  a 
globe  and  visualize  the  shift  of  the  crust  that  moved  Alaska 
from,  and  Greenland  to,  the  pole,  and  if  you  use  a  tape 
measure  to  measure  the  distances  from  each  polar  position 
to  the  Caribbean  and  to  the  equator  off  the  bulge  of  Africa, 
you  will  see  that  that  particular  polar  shift  should  make  only 
a  comparatively  slight  change  in  the  latitude  of  the  Carib- 
bean, but  a  very  radical  change  indeed  in  the  latitude  of  the 
eastern  Equatorial  Atlantic.  And  since  the  movement  would 
take  the  same  period  of  time  in  both  cases,  the  rate  of  move- 
ment would  necessarily  be  much  more  rapid  in  the  eastern 
Atlantic,  and  this  both  agrees  with  and  explains  the  core 
evidence. 


5.  Alaska  at  the  Pole 

We  have  already  seen  that  the  assumption  of  Alaska's  posi- 
tion at  the  pole  between  about  80,000  and  about  130,000 
years  ago  helps  to  solve  a  number  of  important  problems. 
The  idea  for  this  position  first  occurred  to  me  when  I 
learned  of  the  work  of  Arrhenius  (i3a),  who  took  cores 
from  the  North  Pacific  and  found  that  there  was  a  fall  of 
temperature  in  that  area  about  100,000  years  ago.  He  de- 
cided that  that  fall  of  temperature  must  have  marked  the 
beginning  of  the  ice  age  everywhere.  But  as  we  have  seen, 
the  evidence  shows  that  this  "ice  age"  began  at  very  different 
times  in  different  areas.  We  are  forced  to  develop  a  theory 
that  will  explain  why  the  ice  age  developed  in  different  areas 
at  different  times. 

I  fully  realize  that  this  suggestion  of  one  previous  polar 
location  before  another  in  an  apparently  endless  succession 
may  cause  some  discomfort  to  the  reader.  He  may  be  willing 
to  settle  for  the  Hudson  Bay  pole;  after  all,  the  evidence  is 
rather  overwhelming.  The  Greenland  pole  may  be  worth 


304  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

considering,  because  after  all  it  at  least  makes  sense  of  the 
radiocarbon  datings  and  the  Atlantic  marine  cores.  But  this 
Alaskan  proposition  is,  he  may  think,  going  altogether  too 
far.  Where  will  we  end?  Is  the  whole  history  of  the  earth 
to  be  considered  in  terms  of  this  hop,  skip,  and  jump  of  the 
poles?  And  is  it  conceivable  that  this  sort  of  thing  could  have 
kept  up  for  two  billion  years? 

If  the  reader  is  having  this  sort  of  crisis  of  belief,  I  suggest 
that  he  consider  the  matter  in  this  light:  one  shift  of  the 
crust,  at  the  end  of  the  ice  age,  has  been  pretty  well  demon- 
strated. Another  one,  at  the  beginning  of  the  ice  age,  is  neces- 
sarily and  logically  implied.  The  interval  between  them 
seems  to  have  been  about  40,000  years.  Now  if  we  accept  one 
such  unit,  why  not  accept  the  previous  ones  also?  After  all, 
the  laws  of  nature  work  continuously:  that  was  the  principle 
laid  down  by  Sir  Charles  Lyell  over  a  century  ago.  It  is  ob- 
viously sensible  to  work  from  the  known  to  the  unknown: 
if  we  are  fairly  sure  that  the  crust  did  move  once  or  twice, 
and  at  a  certain  rate,  then  it  is  but  a  jump  to  accepting  with- 
out a  qualm  a  thousand  such  movements  in  the  long  history 
of  the  globe. 

The  further  advantages  inherent  in  the  assumption  of  the 
Alaskan  pole,  and  the  general  evidence  for  it,  may  be  briefly 
summarized.  It  explains  the  cause  of  the  warm  Interglacial 
Period  in  Europe,  when  lions  and  hippopotamuses  and  ele- 
phants romped  around  in  Britain  and  on  the  Continent  (to 
which  Britain  was  then  probably  joined).  It  allows  for  the 
Sangamon  Interglacial  in  the  eastern  parts  of  the  United 
States  and  Canada.  As  between  the  two  polar  positions,  in 
Greenland  and  Alaska,  we  have  an  explanation  of  the  length 
of  the  Sangamon  Interglacial.  We  may  visualize  it  as  a  warm 
period  that  began  and  ended  at  different  times  in  different 
parts  of  North  America,  and  that  was  warmer  in  given  areas 
at  certain  times  than  at  others.  The  speed  of  climatic  changes 
was  slow  enough  to  permit  the  gradual  migration  and  adapta- 
tion of  species,  and  yet  there  were  also  abrupt,  disastrous 
changes  due  to  the  effects  of  volcanism,  which,  as  we  have 


EARLIER     DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  305 

seen,  could  account  for  the  widespread  Pleistocene  extinc- 
tions. 

Speaking  of  more  specific  evidences,  if  the  Alaskan  Penin- 
sula were  near  the  North  Pole,  this  would  have  meant  the 
deglaciation  of  the  Ross  Sea  and,  indeed,  of  all  that  half  of 
Antarctica.  What  have  the  Ross  Sea  cores  (Figure  XI)  to 
say?  Core  N-4  shows  deposition  of  nonglacial  sediment  from 
110,000  to  130,000  years  ago.  This  by  itself  provides  some 
confirmation.  Core  N-5  shows  deposition  of  nonglacial  sedi- 
ment from  130,000  to  180,000  years  ago,  implying  that  either 
the  pole  was  situated  in  Alaska  for  a  long  time  or  else  a  still 
earlier  polar  position  was  so  situated  as  to  give  Antarctica 
temperate  conditions.  Core  N-g  shows  fine  glacial  sediment 
from  about  120,000  to  about  200,000  years  ago.  This,  too, 
implies  a  climate  warmer  than  the  present,  but  the  evidence 
is,  obviously,  inconclusive.  Only  a  great  many  more  cores 
from  the  same  area  can  clarify  these  ambiguities. 

As  I  have  mentioned,  with  each  step  backward  into  the 
past,  the  evidence  decreases  geometrically  in  quantity.  The 
available  indications  of  a  pole  in  Alaska  amount  to  no  more 
than  suggestions  for  research,  but,  in  my  opinion,  they  can- 
not be  disregarded  on  that  account.  It  might  be  objected 
that  if  Alaska  was  at  the  pole  only  100,000  years  ago,  there 
should  be  plentiful  evidence  of  a  continental  glaciation  in 
Alaska.  We  must  not  be  too  easily  impressed  by  this  objec- 
tion. In  the  first  place,  there  is  a  possibility  that  many  of  the 
evidences  have  been  destroyed  since  that  time  by  the  glaciers 
of  the  Wisconsin  period,  and  by  the  present  glaciers.  Then, 
there  is  the  obvious  possibility  that  evidences  have  been  over- 
looked or  misinterpreted,  as  seems  to  have  occurred  in  Brit- 
ain. Finally,  if  widespread  subsidence  of  land  areas  has  oc- 
curred in  the  North  Atlantic,  so  may  it  have  occurred  in  the 
Pacific.  Extensive  evidence  of  a  North  Pacific  land  bridge 
(not  to  be  confused  with  a  Behring  Strait  connection)  has 
been  summarized  by  Dodson  (115:373).  How  long  Dodson's 
land  connection  may  have  lasted  is  not  known,  but  it  could 
conceivably  have  lasted  until  comparatively  recent  times. 


306 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 


CORRELATION          IN   YEARS                      TOUT'S                                     €8'  I?1  8 
IURRY)                              ;tV)M                                           37-JOM 

•  Q*  8«'S 

soo   -. 

1  000  —  ' 

&•&*                                      ilj^ji 

•;%r- 

II 

SYMBOL    -TYPE    OP  SXOIMINT 

w 

8  000  — 

p^A^    COARSE  OLACIAL  MARINE 
pj^g    MEDIUM   OLACIAL  MAWNC 

LATt 
WISCONSIN 

INTER«LACIAL 

SANOAMON 
WTCR«LAOAL 

10000  — 

JO  000  — 
30000  —  ' 
40000  -i 

so  ooo  — 

100000  — 

* 

I           I    FINE  OLACIAL  MARINC 

EH  'awAaraTa. 

n  r^uo4w"  WILL- 

M     LAMINATED    PlNC   OUINEO 
WELL  SORTED 

m—- 

I 

I"  "     ^ 

Is    

LITHOLOOY    BY    J.L.HOU6N 

ILLINOIAM 

YARMOUTH 
INTER  OLACIAL 

«oooo,o  ~ 

300  000  - 
400000  - 

.. 

ACE    DETERMINATIONS   BY 
W.O.URRY,  USINO   PCX    CENT    OP 
EQUILIBRIUM   METHOD  POM   URANIUM 
lOUUM    AND  RADIUM.  ACES  GREATER 
THAN    300.000    YEARS   BY    EX- 

" 

fp 

:'!'.  •/..  '• 

SOO  000  - 

n^riim 
'"'i?1'  ', 

•00000  - 

K  A  II  SAN 

- 

700000  - 

li 

AFTON1AN 
INTEMLAOAL 

•00000  - 

S^ 

MEMASKAN 

- 

S- 

•00  000  - 
1000000  - 

I 

Fig.  XI.    Lithology  of  Core  Samples,  Ross  Sea,  Antarctica 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS    OF    CRUST  307 

A  small  amount  of  additional  evidence  for  our  assumed 
sequence  of  climates  in  Alaska  has  come  to  light.  Our  assump- 
tions call  for  a  frigid  climate  in  Alaska  down  to  about  75,000 
years  ago,  with  a  warming  of  the  climate  coinciding  with  the 
refrigeration  of  the  Atlantic  as  the  polar  position  migrated 
to  Greenland.  Then,  about  25,000  or  30,000  years  ago,  the 
climate  was  refrigerated  (later  than  in  eastern  North  Amer- 
ica) as  a  consequence  of  the  advance  of  the  Wisconsin  ice 
sheet. 

Karlstrom  (247)  has  shown  through  radiocarbon  dating 
that  the  oldest  glacial  stage  of  the  Wisconsin  glacial  period 
in  Alaska  began  not  earlier  than  the  Farmdale  Advance  in 
Ohio,  25,000  years  ago,  and  not  later  than  19,000  years  ago. 
This  is  in  accord  with  our  supposition  that  the  glacial  cli- 
mate advanced  from  the  east.  Before  this  Alaskan  glacial 
stage,  Karlstrom  has  an  interglacial  extending  back  an  un- 
certain distance.  This,  obviously,  is,  in  terms  of  current 
theory,  in  disaccord  with  the  contemporary  climatic  trends 
in  the  Atlantic.  Before  the  interglacial  period  Karlstrom 
notes  evidence  of  a  glaciation  that  he  considers  to  be  pre- 
Wisconsin  but  post-Illinoisan.  Since  this  glaciation  was  be- 
yond the  range  of  the  radiocarbon  method,  he  had  to  depend 
upon  the  assumption  of  climatic  control  by  the  solar  insola- 
tion curve  in  order  to  estimate  its  date.  He  estimates  that 
this  older  glaciation  was  at  least  47,000  but  not  more  than 
87,000  years  ago.  Presumably  these  dates  mark  the  estimated 
time  of  the  end  of  the  glaciation.  Even  though  his  basis  of 
calculation  may  not  seem  acceptable  (for  reasons  already  dis- 
cussed), it  is  plain  that  his  date  is  in  pretty  good  accord  with 
our  date  for  the  Alaskan  pole.  No  doubt  it  is  based  in  part 
on  a  lot  of  stratigraphic  studies  that  prove  the  antiquity  of 
the  glaciation,  and  at  the  same  time  show  that  it  is  younger 
than  the  Illinoisan  ice  age. 

This  climatic  reconstruction  throws  an  interesting  light  on 
a  forgotten  item  of  paleontological  research  that  I  chanced 
upon  in  the  Smithsonian  Miscellaneous  Collections  for  1913. 
It  was  entitled  "Notice  of  the  Occurrence  of  a  Pleistocene 


308  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

Camel  North  of  the  Arctic  Circle/'  The  author,  James  Wil- 
liam Gidley,  described  the  discovery  in  Alaska  not  only  of 
the  camel  remains  but  also  of  the  remains  of  elephant  and 
of  other  animals,  including  the  horse  and  bison.  He  then 
remarks  that  the  discovery  "adds  proof  in  support  of  the  sup- 
position that  milder  climatic  conditions  prevailed  in  Alaska 
during  probably  the  greater  part  of  the  Pleistocene  period" 
(173:1).  We  do  not  have  to  go  all  the  way  with  Mr.  Gidley. 
But  here  indeed  is  evidence  enough  of  the  existence  of 
really  temperate  conditions  very  possibly  in  the  very  period 
of  time  when  the  assumption  of  the  Greenland  pole  calls  for 
them.  A  final  consideration  relating  to  the  evidence  for  a 
pole  in  Alaska  is  that  this  could  have  caused  the  Cordilleran 
glaciation,  which,  according  to  Coleman,  preceded  the  Lab- 
rador and  Keewatin  ice  sheets  (87:10).  It  may  be  added  also 
that  there  is  real  support  from  fossil  terrestrial  magnetism 
for  the  polar  succession  in  Alaska  and  Greenland.  The  Jap- 
anese geophysicist  Akimoto  and  his  colleagues  have  produced 
magnetic  evidence  of  the  migration  of  the  pole  from  north 
of  North  Central  Siberia,  in  the  Arctic  Ocean,  across  Alaska 
to  Greenland  in  the  Pleistocene  (418:11). 

Thus  the  matter  must  be  left,  for  the  present.  If  it  seems 
to  the  reader  that  I  have  sometimes  based  too  much  on  too 
little  data,  and  that  I  sometimes  attribute  too  much  signifi- 
cance to  isolated  facts,  I  agree  that  I  have  probably  commit- 
ted this  error  at  times.  On  the  other  hand,  there  is  sometimes 
a  tendency  to  postpone  any  thinking,  in  the  hope  that  the 
necessity  of  revising  basic  principles  may  be  removed  by 
additional  facts. 


6.  The  Remoter  Past 

Since,  as  I  have  mentioned,  with  every  step  backward  into 
time  the  evidence  becomes  thinner,  it  is  hardly  worth  while 
to  attempt,  at  present,  to  solve  the  problem  of  the  earlier 
positions  of  the  poles  that  would  be  required  to  explain  the 


EARLIER     DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST  309 

climatic  history  of  the  Pleistocene.  Eventually,  perhaps,  this 
can  be  done.  Much  more  practical  questions  remain  to  be 
considered. 

We  must  consider  whether  the  rate  of  geological  change 
suggested  for  the  last  130,000  years,  by  the  evidence  pre- 
sented in  this  book,  can  be  typical  for  the  entire  history  of 
the  earth.  It  is  plain  from  the  cores  that  rapid  change  has 
characterized  the  record  for  the  Pleistocene.  Radiocarbon 
dating  has  established  the  fact  that  all  the  geological  processes 
of  glacial  growth  and  decay,  precipitation  and  sedimentation, 
were  enormously  accelerated  during  the  Wisconsin  ice  age. 
Emiliani  has  argued,  as  already  mentioned,  that  all  the  ice 
ages  of  the  Pleistocene  occurred  in  the  last  300,000  years, 
which  implies  a  threefold  increase  in  the  velocity  of  geologi- 
cal change,  as  compared  with  the  older  views.  Studies  of  the 
delta  of  the  Mississippi  River  suggest  numerous  important 
changes  at  short  intervals  (165,  276,  349).  Blanchard  has 
shown  that  there  were  at  least  twelve  major  climatic  changes 
in  the  valley  of  the  Somme  since  the  first  glaciation,  accom- 
panied by  changes  in  sea  levels,  fauna  and  flora,  and  human 
cultures.  As  already  mentioned,  he  argues  that  only  polar 
change  can  explain  this  record  (38). 

For  the  older  geological  periods,  there  are  a  number  of 
lines  of  evidence  that  suggest  rapid  change.  So  insistently, 
indeed,  does  this  theme  occur  in  the  strata  that  Brooks,  in 
his  Climate  Through  the  Ages,  refers  to  a  2i,ooo-year  cycle 
of  climatic  change  which  he  believes  operated  through  the 
whole  Eocene  Period,  or  for  about  15,000,000  years.  His  fig- 
ure, of  course,  is  only  a  rough  average,  and  the  intervals  may 
have  been  very  unequal  in  length.  With  reference  to  a  still 
older  period  he  remarks,  "Alternations  in  the  Cretaceous 
of  U.S.A.  suggest  a  cycle  that  is  estimated  at  21,000  years, 
but  there  are  no  annual  layers"  (52:108). 

Irregularities  in  the  cycle  are  indicated  by  another  study 
of  Eocene  beds  covering  about  5,000,000  to  8,000,000  years. 
In  this  case  annual  varves  were  present,  and  they  indicated 
long-term  changes  at  23,000  and  50,000  years  (52:108).  Some 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

scientists  have  attempted  to  explain  these  cycles  as  the  result 
of  the  earth's  astronomical  precession,  but,  in  view  of  the 
above-mentioned  irregularities,  the  phenomena  seem  better 
explained  in  terms  of  crust  displacements. 

Naturally,  such  frequent  changes  in  climate  have  had  pro- 
found effects  on  the  formation  of  sedimentary  rocks,  the 
chief  consequence,  perhaps,  being  the  thinness  of  the  indi- 
vidual strata.  Very  seldom  can  deposits  be  found  that  indi- 
cate with  any  certainty  the  uninterrupted  deposition  of  more 
than  a  few  thousand  years.  On  the  other  hand,  innumerable 
cases  of  conditions  interrupted  after  a  few  thousand  years 
can  be  proved.  In  addition  to  the  evidence  mentioned  above, 
Brooks,  for  example,  refers  to  a  great  salt  lake  or  inland  sea 
that  existed  in  Europe  in  the  Permian  Period,  and  says: 

The  number  of  annual  layers  indicates  that  the  salt  lake  existed 
for  some  10,000  years,  after  which  the  salt  deposits  were  covered  by  a 
layer  of  desert  sand  (521*5). 

Wallace,  too,  refers  to  the  evidence  of  sudden  changes  in 
climate  at  short  intervals,  in  his  Island  Life:  ".  .  .  the 
numerous  changes  in  the  fossil  remains  from  bed  to  bed  only 
a  few  feet  and  sometimes  a  few  inches  apart"  (446:204). 

Some  of  the  best  evidence  is  provided  by  coal  seams,  which 
are  ordinarily  thin  and  interlayered  with  rock  indicating 
very  different  climatic  conditions.  There  has  developed  a 
considerable  literature  on  the  rate  of  coal  formation,  and 
some  recent  experimentation  has  thrown  light  upon  it. 

Croll  devoted  considerable  attention  to  the  problem.  He 
estimated  that  it  would  take  about  5,000  years  for  the  forma- 
tion of  one  yard  (or  about  a  meter)  of  coal  (91:429),  and 
came  to  the  conclusion  that  the  periods  of  coal  formation 
between  changes  in  climate  were  about  10,000  years  long.  It 
is  obvious  that  any  changes  that  replaced  conditions  required 
for  coal  formation  by  conditions  suitable  for  the  formation 
of  sedimentary  deposits  beneath  the  sea  (for  Croll  points  out 
that  rock  strata  between  the  coal  strata  are  usually  of  marine 
origin)  (91:424)  were  indeed  radical  changes,  taking  place  in 


EARLIER    DISPLACEMENTS     OF    CRUST  Jll 

short  periods  of  time.  Another  writer,  Otto  Stutzer,  after 
very  careful  calculation,  concluded  that  a  Pittsburgh  coal 
bed  seven  feet  thick  could  have  been  formed  in  no  more 
than  2,100  years  (407). 

In  view  of  all  this  evidence,  we  must  not  be  too  much  im- 
pressed by  the  very  thick  layers  of  rock  that  are  occasionally 
found.  Croll,  who  was  a  sound  geologist,  even  if  his  theory 
about  ice  ages  was  not  accepted,  pointed  out  that 

.  .  .  The  thickness  of  a  deposit  will  depend  upon  a  great  many 
circumstances,  such  as  whether  the  deposition  took  place  near  to  land 
or  far  away  in  the  deep  recesses  of  the  ocean,  whether  it  occurred  at 
the  mouth  of  a  great  river  or  along  the  sea-shore,  or  at  a  time  when 
the  sea-bottom  was  rising,  subsiding  or  remaining  stationary.  Stratified 
formations  10,000  feet  in  thickness,  for  example,  may  under  some 
conditions,  have  been  formed  in  as  many  years,  while  under  other 
conditions  it  may  have  required  as  many  centuries  (91:338). 

It  is  worth  noting  that  at  a  number  of  points  the  evidence 
for  great  and  frequent  changes  in  the  earth's  climatic  condi- 
tions is  linked  with  evidence  of  structural  changes  in  the 
earth's  crust,  that  is,  with  changes  in  the  elevation  of  lands, 
and  in  the  distribution  of  land  and  sea.  Croll  remarked: 

...  It  is  worthy  of  notice  that  the  stratified  beds  between  the  coal 
seams  are  of  marine  and  not  of  lacustrine  origin.  ...  If,  for  example, 
there  are  six  coal  seams,  one  above  another,  this  proves  that  the  land 
must  have  been  at  least  six  times  below  and  six  times  above  sea-level 
(91:424). 

Coleman  has  emphasized  the  frequent  association  of 
abrupt  breaks  in  the  continuity  of  the  strata  with  extreme 
changes  of  elevation  above  or  below  sea  level.  In  discussing 
the  Permo-Carboniferous  period  in  India,  he  says: 

There  are  the  usual  cold  climate  fern  leaves  in  these  beds,  and 
above  them,  without  an  apparent  break,  come  the  Productus  lime- 
stones with  marine  fossils  (87:102). 

Now,  it  seems  altogether  reasonable  to  suppose  that  if 
changes  of  climate  were  associated  with  changes  of  elevation 
in  these  different  kinds  of  cases,  then  the  two  may  have  oc- 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

curred  at  the  same  tempo,  and  have  proceeded  from  the 
same  cause.  The  hypothesis  of  periodical  shifts  of  the  earth's 
crust  provides  both  the  link  and  the  cause. 

An  interesting  study  of  repeating  geological  cycles  in  a  very 
remote  period  has  been  completed  by  Weller  (451).  He  deals 
with  the  so-called  "Pennsylvanian"  period  several  hundred 
million  years  ago,  which  had  a  span  of  between  35  and  50 
million  years.  He  points  out  that  in  the  study  of  this  period 
numerous  examples  have  been  observed  of  the  deposition 
of  different  kinds  of  sedimentary  beds  in  the  same  order,  at 
irregular  intervals  of  time.  The  changes  in  the  composition 
of  the  beds  imply  changes  both  in  climate  and  in  the  eleva- 
tion of  the  areas  above  sea  level.  The  cycles  are  not  just  local, 
but  can  be  traced  over  wide  areas  (451:110).  Furthermore, 
each  complete  cycle  represents  an  advance,  retreat,  and  re- 
advance  of  the  sea.  Weller  accounts  for  the  cycles  by  dias- 
trophism— that  is,  by  some  sort  of  upheaval  in  the  earth, 
some  activity  within  the  earth's  body— but  is  not  able  to 
specify  its  nature.  He  recognizes  about  42  cycles  during  the 
period,  with  each  cycle  having  a  duration  of  about  400,000 
years. 

These  cycles  would  appear  at  first  glance  to  be  consider- 
ably longer  than  those  that  might  result  from  crust  displace- 
ments. However,  there  are  a  number  of  factors  that  tend  to 
lessen  the  apparent  difference  between  them.  First,  Weller 
points  out  that  discontinuities  in  the  deposits  he  is  discussing 
are  far  more  numerous  than  is  generally  supposed  (451:99- 
101).  This  means  that  a  part  of  the  record  is  missing.  Then, 
we  must  remember  that  a  complete  cycle,  involving  the  re- 
treat and  the  advance  of  the  sea  (probably  in  a  number  of 
stages),  would  call  for  several,  perhaps  quite  a  few,  move- 
ments of  the  crust.  At  any  one  point  on  the  earth's  surface, 
several  movements  might  be  required  to  bring  the  sea  level 
to  its  lowest  point,  and  several  more  to  bring  it  to  its  highest 
point.  We  have  already  discussed  this  question  (Chapter  IV). 
Moreover,  Weller  points  out  that  in  each  of  his  cycles  deposi- 
tion has  been  interrupted  two  different  times,  thus  reducing 


EARLIER     DISPLACEMENTS     OF     CRUST 

the  average  length  of  the  subdivisions  of  the  cycle  to  periods 
of  the  order  of  75,000  to  250,000  years.  But  it  must  be  re- 
membered that  we  have  only  averages;  the  cycles  differ 
greatly  and  their  subdivisions  also  differ  greatly  in  length. 
When  we  consider  the  fact  that  the  intervals  and  directions 
of  crust  displacements  are  necessarily  irregular,  there  appears 
to  be  a  very  good  agreement  between  our  theory  and  the 
facts  of  the  Pennsylvanian  cycles.  At  least,  it  will  hardly  be 
denied  that  the  theory  offers  the  first  possibility  of  under- 
standing the  cycles.  Moreover,  if  our  recent  experience  of  the 
shortening  of  our  estimates  of  geological  time  in  the  Pleisto- 
cene is  a  valid  basis  for  extrapolating  to  earlier  periods,  it 
may  well  be  that  geologists  have  exaggerated  the  length  of 
the  Pennsylvanian  Period,  and  that  Weller  has  consequently 
attributed  too  great  an  average  duration  to  his  cycles.  It 
appears,  therefore,  that  crust  displacements  may  have  been 
occurring  through  the  whole  of  one  of  the  major  subdivisions 
of  the  Paleozoic  Era. 

It  is  impossible,  however,  in  the  present  state  of  the  evi- 
dence, to  say  that  displacements  of  the  crust  have  been  going 
on  uninterruptedly  all  through  geological  history.  It  may  be 
that  there  have  been  times  of  quiet,  when,  for  one  reason  or 
another,  great  icecaps  failed  to  develop.  The  important  thing 
at  the  moment  is  that  investigators  should  be  willing  to  un- 
dertake further  inquiry  without  preconceptions  based  on 
outmoded  ideas  of  gradual  change.  We  may  note  a  serious 
warning  against  this  bias  uttered  by  no  less  an  authority  than 
Sir  Charles  Lyell,  the  greatest  geologist  of  the  first  half  of  the 
nineteenth  century,  and  the  father  of  gradualism  in  geology. 
In  the  course  of  a  discussion  of  some  evidence  of  recent  fold- 
ing of  rock  strata  on  the  Danish  island  of  Moen,  he  remarked: 

It  is  impossible  to  behold  such  effects  of  reiterated  earth  move- 
ments, all  of  post-Tertiary  date,  without  reflecting  that,  but  for  the 
accidental  presence  of  the  stratified  drift,  all  of  which  might  easily, 
where  there  has  been  so  much  denudation,  have  been  lacking,  even 
if  it  had  once  existed,  we  might  have  referred  the  verticality  and 
flexures  and  faults  of  the  rocks  to  an  ancient  period,  such  as  the  era 


314  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

between  the  chalk  with  flints  and  the  Maestricht  chalk,  or  to  the 
time  of  the  latter  formation,  or  to  the  Eocene,  or  Miocene  or  older 
Pliocene  eras.  .  .  .  Hence  we  may  be  permitted  to  suspect  that  in 
some  other  regions,  where  we  have  no  such  means  at  our  command 
for  testing  the  exact  date  of  certain  movements,  the  time  of  their  oc- 
currence may  be  far  more  modern  than  we  usually  suppose  (281: 
393-94)- 

And  let  us  also  recall  the  following  words  of  the  greatest  geol- 
ogist of  the  second  half  of  the  nineteenth  century,  Eduard 
Suess: 

The  enthusiasm  with  which  the  little  polyp  building  up  the  coral 
reef,  and  the  raindrop  hollowing  out  the  stone,  have  been  contem- 
plated, has,  I  fear,  introduced  into  the  consideration  of  important 
questions  concerning  the  history  of  the  earth  a  certain  element  of 
geological  quietism— derived  from  the  peaceable  commonplaceness  of 
everyday  life— an  element  which  by  no  means  contributes  to  a  just 
conception  of  those  phenomena  which  have  been  and  still  are  of  the 
first  consequence  in  fashioning  the  face  of  the  earth. 

The  convulsions  which  have  affected  certain  parts  of  the  earth's 
crust,  with  a  frequency  far  greater  than  was  until  recently  supposed, 
show  clearly  enough  how  one-sided  this  point  of  view  is.  The  earth- 
quakes of  today  are  but  faint  reminiscences  of  those  telluric  move- 
ments to  which  the  structure  of  almost  every  mountain  range  bears 
witness.  Numerous  examples  of  great  mountain  chains  suggest  by 
their  structure  the  possibility,  and  even  in  some  cases  the  probability, 
of  the  occasional  intervention  in  the  course  of  great  geological  eras 
of  processes  of  episodal  disturbances  of  such  indescribable  and  over- 
whelming violence,  that  the  imagination  refuses  to  follow  the  under- 
standing and  to  complete  the  picture  of  which  the  outlines  are 
furnished  by  observations  of  fact  (408:!,  17-18). 

The  great  work  from  which  the  foregoing  statement  was 
taken  is  entitled  The  Face  of  the  Earth.  The  prospect  that 
unfolds  before  us,  as  we  contemplate  the  possibility  that  total 
displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  have  been  a  feature  of  geo- 
logical history  since  the  formation  of  the  crust  itself,  is  noth- 
ing less  than  the  discovery  of  the  formative  force,  of  the 
shaping  factor,  that  has  been  responsible  not  only  for  ice 
ages,  not  only  for  the  mountain  ranges,  but  even  possibly  for 
the  very  history  of  the  continents,  and  for  all  the  funda- 
mental features  of  the  face  of  the  earth. 


X  :  LIFE 


In  the  preceding  chapters  we  have  reviewed  a  mass  of  evi- 
dence that  suggests  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust,  at 
comparatively  short  intervals,  during  the  earth's  history.  We 
shall  now  see  that  this  assumption  throws  some  light  on  the 
process  of  evolution. 


/.  The  Cause  of  Evolution 

A  century  ago,  in  the  Origin  of  Species,  Darwin  suggested 
natural  selection  as  the  mechanism  to  account  for  evolution. 
The  combination  of  the  occurrence  of  natural  variations 
with  elimination  of  the  unfit  individuals  in  the  competitive 
struggle  for  existence  helped  to  explain  a  process  of  un- 
ending, gradual  change  in  the  forms  of  life.  Darwin  did  not 
consider  that  this  was  the  whole  answer.  He  admitted,  for 
example,  that  he  could  not  explain  the  numerous  instances 
of  the  world-wide  extinction  of  many  forms  of  life  simultane- 
ously, especially  in  those  cases  where,  apparently,  there  were 
no  competitors  and  no  successors  to  the  extinct  forms.  Biolo- 
gists today  are  in  agreement  that  evolution  has  occurred,  but 
they  also  feel  that  the  process  has  not  been  satisfactorily  ex- 
plained. Thus  Dr.  Barghoorn,  of  Harvard,  has  recently  re- 
ferred to  "our  limited  understanding  of  the  actual  causes  of 
evolution,"  while  quoting  Dr.  George  Gaylord  Simpson, 
author  of  the  widely  read  Meaning  of  Evolution,  as  remark- 
ing, ".  .  .  search  for  the  cause  of  evolution  has  been  aban- 
doned" (375:238).  There  is  a  tendency  at  the  present  time 
for  specialists  to  recognize  a  large  number  of  interacting  fac- 
tors that  may,  together,  conceivably  account  for  evolution, 
though  their  relative  importance  is  not  agreed  upon.  This 
situation  does  not  exclude  the  possibility  that  the  confusion 


316  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

may,  indeed,  arise  because  one  factor  is  still  missing:  a  factor 
which,  when  added,  will  bring  the  others  into  proper  focus. 


2.  The  Problem  of  Time 

While  no  biologists  since  Darwin's  time  have  questioned  the 
basic  fact  of  evolution,  numerous  difficulties  have  developed 
with  natural  selection.  In  the  first  place,  while  Darwin  could 
present  evidence  of  changes  produced  in  varieties  of  plants 
and  animals  by  artificial  selective  breeding,  he  was  not  able 
to  show  how,  even  under  artificial  conditions,  such  changes 
could  lead  to  the  establishment  of  new  species.  Recently, 
some  progress  may  have  been  made  in  solving  this  problem, 
but  by  the  end  of  the  nineteenth  century,  Darwin's  explana- 
tion of  the  mechanism  of  evolution  had  been  largely  aban- 
doned. Natural  selection  had  come  to  be  considered,  by 
many  biologists,  as  chiefly  a  negative  factor,  capable  of  elimi- 
nating unadapted  variations  but  not  of  producing  new 
species. 

Around  the  turn  of  the  century  the  attention  of  evolution- 
ists was  turned  to  mutation,  the  sudden  change  in  hereditary 
characteristics  produced  by  an  alteration  of  the  basic  genetic 
factors,  genes  and  chromosomes.  One  of  the  early  mutation- 
ists,  Hugo  de  Vries,  believed  that  a  large-scale  mutation 
might  produce  a  new  kind  of  plant  or  animal  in  a  single 
step  (115:96).  Many  evolutionists  then  adopted  mutation, 
and  gave  up  natural  selection  as  the  explanation  of  evolution. 

This  did  not,  however,  end  the  controversy.  A  neo-Dar- 
winian  school,  clinging  to  natural  selection,  raised  damaging 
objections  to  the  theory  of  evolution  through  massive  muta- 
tions. They  insisted,  for  one  thing,  that  different  plants  or 
animals  differed  by  a  great  many  minor  traits,  rather  than 
by  a  few  major  ones.  This  would  mean  that  a  great  many 
mutations  would  be  required,  and  that  these  mutations 
would  have  to  take  place  in  the  same  individual,  or  in  the 
same  line  of  descent.  The  fact  that  mutation  is  apparently 


LIFE  317 

an  entirely  accidental  process  rendered  the  mathematical 
chances  against  the  coincidence  of  many  mutations  in  one 
individual  or  in  one  line  o£  individuals  completely  over- 
whelming. 

But  this  was  by  no  means  the  only  difficulty.  The  anti- 
mutationists  could  argue  that  since  mutations  were  purely 
accidental  changes  in  the  hereditary  factors,  and  did  not 
occur  in  response  to  needs  created  by  the  environment,  most 
mutations  would  be  positively  harmful,  or  at  least  negative, 
and  would  have  no  effect  on  the  adaptation  of  the  organism 
to  its  environment.  Only  a  chance  mutation  now  and  then 
could  help  an  organism  to  survive.  Mutationists  were  unable 
to  show  the  existence  of  any  principle  by  which  mutations 
would  be  adaptive,  that  is,  brought  about  as  a  part  of  an 
effort  of  an  organism  to  adapt  to  the  environment.  Some 
recent  experiments  indicate  that  such  adaptive  mutation 
may  occur,  perhaps  under  special  and  rare  conditions,  but 
it  still  cannot  be  shown  that  adaptation  by  mutation  has  been 
an  important  factor  in  evolution. 

The  mutationists  did  establish,  of  course,  that  minor  muta- 
tions were  of  frequent  occurrence,  and  might  even  be  in- 
duced artificially;  therefore,  evolutionists  accepted  them,  but 
they  recognized  them  as  just  another  way  of  accounting  for 
the  occurrence  of  variations.  The  law  of  natural  selection 
would  still  be  required,  in  order  to  eliminate  the  harmful 
mutations,  which  would  constitute  the  great  majority  of  all 
mutations.  For  a  while  it  seemed  that,  in  this  way,  the  basic 
question  of  evolution  was  answered. 

It  soon  appeared  that  this  was  very  far  from  being  the 
case.  The  acceptance  of  mutations  by  the  Darwinians  as  a 
factor  in  evolution  did  not  solve  the  problem.  It  became 
clear,  as  time  passed,  that  a  major  difficulty  remained.  Atten- 
tion was  concentrated  on  the  rate  at  which  mutation  and 
natural  selection  could  be  effective  in  changing  life  forms. 
Mathematical  studies  showed  that  such  changes  would  take 
place,  according  to  the  theory,  at  rates  so  slow  that  even  long 


318  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

geological  eras  would  provide  insufficient  time  for  evolution. 
Professor  Dodson  wrote: 

In  nature,  neither  mutation  nor  selection  will  ordinarily  occur 
alone,  and  so  the  two  will  act  simultaneously,  perhaps  in  the  same 
direction,  perhaps  in  opposite  directions.  .  .  .  Most  frequently,  selec- 
tion will  work  against  mutation,  as  the  majority  of  possible  mutations 
are  deleterious.  This  will  result  in  very  slow  change,  if  any.  .  .  . 
(115:298). 

He  emphasized: 

It  appears  that  it  is  extremely  difficult  for  mild  selection  pressures, 
unaided  by  any  other  factor,  to  establish  a  new  dominant  gene  in  a 
species.  .  .  .  (115:298). 

By  "mild  selection  pressure/'  Dodson  means  those  condi- 
tions of  competition  between  life  forms  pointed  out  by  Dar- 
win, that  is,  the  competition  that  goes  on  at  all  times.  What 
he  suggests  here  is  that  some  more  drastic  influence  must 
have  operated  to  produce  evolutionary  change. 

After  discussing  Haldane's  mathematical  calculations  indi- 
cating the  astronomical  numbers  of  generations  that  might 
be  required  to  change  a  plant  or  animal  under  the  influence 
of  mild  selection  pressures,  Dodson  quotes  Dobzhansky  (the 
leader  of  the  neo-Darwinian  school)  on  their  implications: 

.  .  .  The  number  of  generations  needed  for  the  change  may,  how- 
ever, be  so  tremendous  that  the  efficiency  of  selection  alone  as  an 
evolutionary  agent  may  be  open  to  doubt,  and  this  even  if  time  on  a 
geological  scale  is  involved  (115:298). 

Thus  the  problem  is  clearly  posed:  it  is  the  problem  of 
time.  It  is  necessary  to  find  some  way  of  explaining  how 
natural  selection  can  have  operated  at  a  sufficiently  rapid 
rate  to  account  for  evolution.  A  factor  of  acceleration  is  re- 
quired. 

Some  writers,  when  they  saw  that  evolution  could  not  be 
explained  even  with  the  enormous  amounts  of  time  available 
under  the  current  concepts  of  the  lengths  of  the  geological 
periods,  felt  compelled  to  revert  to  mystical  explanations. 
Writers  such  as  du  Noiiy  (119)  concluded  that  evolution  was 


LIFE 

totally  inconceivable  unless  its  course  had  been  indicated  in 
advance,  by  the  reigning  influence  of  cosmic  purpose.  For 
these  writers,  the  end  or  final  purpose  of  evolution  must  be 
the  active  controlling  force  of  the  whole  process.  The  process, 
at  basis,  could  be  understood  only  as  the  direct  effect  and 
evidence  of  the  will  of  God. 

Another  solution  was  proposed  by  Richard  Goldschmidt, 
who  became  the  leader  of  the  anti-Darwinians.  He  renewed 
the  emphasis  on  major  or  macromutations.  As  Dodson 
puts  it: 

.  .  .  Goldschmidt  believes  that  the  neoDarwinian  theory  places 
too  great  a  burden  upon  natural  selection,  and  hence  that  the  work 
of  selection  must  be  shortened  by  some  other  process,  namely  sys- 
tematic mutation  (115:299). 

By  "systematic  mutation* '  is  meant  a  mutation  that  changes 
not  merely  an  individual  trait  of  an  organism  but  a  whole 
complex  of  traits,  that  is,  that  changes  a  basic  principle  of 
the  biological  system.  The  great  advantage  of  Goldschmidt's 
theory  is  that  it  may  greatly  reduce  the  number  of  "genes" 
required  to  account  for  the  traits  of  a  single  individual. 
Under  present  concepts  of  genetics,  for  example,  from  5,000 
to  15,000  "genes"  may  be  called  for  to  account  for  all  the 
traits  of  the  fruit  fly,  Drosophila  melanogaster,  while  as  many 
as  120,000  may  be  required  for  man  (115:245).  The  gene  it- 
self, of  course,  since  it  has  never  been  identified  under  the 
microscope,  and  since  its  structure  and  mode  of  functioning 
are  entirely  unknown,  must  still  be  classified  as  a  useful  scien- 
tific assumption,  rather  than  as  a  verified  entity.  The  present 
state  of  gene  theory  is  roughly  analogous  to  the  state  of 
atomic  theory  before  the  development  of  subatomic  physics. 
Then  the  atomic  theory  was  accepted  because  it  worked  in 
practice,  but  nobody  knew  what  an  atom  was.  Today,  we 
know  only  that  some  sort  of  unit  like  a  gene  seems  necessary. 

The  majority  of  writers  on  evolution  today  seem  to  feel 
that  Goldschmidt's  specific  arguments  for  macromutations 
have  been  refuted.  I  can  contribute  no  opinion  on  this  tech- 
nical question.  But,  from  my  point  of  view,  the  most  signifi- 


320  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

cant  thing  about  the  Goldschmidt  theory  is  that  he  produced 
it  in  an  effort  to  gain  time  for  the  process  of  evolution,  to 
accelerate  it,  so  that  the  amount  of  evolutionary  change  in 
life  forms  could  be  brought  into  rough  agreement  with  the 
available  amount  of  geological  time.  The  rejection  of  his 
theory,  if  the  rejection  is  indeed  based  upon  sound  considera- 
tions, means  that  another  factor  must  be  found  to  account 
for  the  tempo  of  evolution. 


3.  Climate  and  Evolution 

Evolutionists,  in  general,  agree  that  climatic  change  must 
have  had  a  powerful  influence  on  evolution.  Geologists  have, 
as  I  have  pointed  out,  found  a  correspondence  between 
periods  of  climatic  change  and  changes  in  the  forms  of  life. 
It  is  evident  that  as  long  as  the  general  environment  remains 
roughly  the  same,  there  can  be  only  gentle  selection  pressures 
such  as,  apparently,  are  inadequate  to  account  for  evolution. 
With  static  environmental  conditions,  forms  of  life  may  con- 
tinue virtually  unchanged  for  tens  or  hundreds  of  millions 
of  years.  There  are  any  number  of  organisms  living  today 
whose  very  similar  ancestors  lived  in  remote  geological 
periods.  To  name  merely  a  few,  there  is  the  newly  discovered 
coelacanth,  a  fish  whose  ancestors,  one  hundred  or  more 
million  years  ago,  looked  as  he  does  today;  the  recently  dis- 
covered Dawn  Redwood,  found  growing  in  China,  after  hav- 
ing been  regarded  as  extinct  since  its  close  relatives  disap- 
peared in  Alaska  about  20,000,000  years  ago;  the  sphenodon, 
a  reptile  of  New  Zealand,  whose  ancestors,  very  closely  re- 
sembling himself,  were  contemporaries  of  Tyrannosaurus 
rex;  horseshoe  crabs,  whose  time  span  may  amount  to  half  a 
billion  years;  palm  trees,  whose  age  has  just  been  "jumped" 
another  10,000,000  years  (261);  sharks;  scorpions,  and  so  on. 
Sanderson  has  pointed  out  that  "living  fossils"  are  simply  too 
numerous  to  list  (365).  We  can  take  it  that,  if  external  condi- 
tions are  stable,  or  if  animals  and  plants  can  migrate  around 


LIFE  321 

to  find  the  conditions  they  are  used  to,  they  may  continue  to 
exist  indefinitely. 

At  the  same  time,  it  is  equally  true  that  any  kind  of  animal 
or  plant  may  succumb,  in  the  course  of  the  usual  and  con- 
tinuous competition  between  life  forms,  and  the  local  or 
transitory  climatic  variations  that  are  always  occurring.  It 
would  distort  the  picture  to  forget  this  fact.  Furthermore, 
recent  studies  have  shown  that  new  varieties  of  plants  and 
animals  can  appear  within  very  short  periods  of  time,  on  the 
order  of  a  century  or  less,  if  they  live  in  conditions  of  isola- 
tion (115:365).  But  these  rapidly  produced  varieties  are  not 
the  same,  of  course,  as  established  species. 

A  factor  which,  undeniably,  must  produce  pressure  for 
profound  change  in  the  forms  of  life  is  major  climatic  change. 
Clearly,  this  will  apply  what  evolutionists  call  "strong  selec- 
tion pressure."  In  this  case  life  forms  will  have  but  three 
alternatives:  to  migrate,  to  adapt,  or  to  die.  Geologists  and 
biologists  have  never  denied  the  truth  of  this:  Coleman,  for 
example,  recognized  the  importance  of  the  glacial  periods  in 
"hastening  and  intensifying"  the  process  of  evolution  (87:62). 
Lull  recognizes  the  importance  of  basic  climatic  change, 
thus: 

.  .  .  For  changes  of  climate  react  directly  upon  plant  life,  and 
hence  both  directly  and  indirectly  upon  that  of  animals,  while  re- 
striction or  amplification  of  habitat  and  the  severance  and  formation 
of  land-bridges  provide  the  essential  isolation,  or  by  the  introduction 
of  new  forms  increase  competition,  both  of  which  stimulate  evolution- 
ary progress  (278:84). 

The  problem  has  been,  until  now,  that  major  climatic 
changes,  and  concomitant  changes  in  the  distribution  of  land 
and  sea,  could  not  be  explained  by  any  acceptable  theory. 
They  were  inexplicable  events  in  themselves;  their  coinci- 
dence in  time  was  inexplicable.  Even  more  serious,  they  were 
assumed  to  have  happened  only  at  such  extremely  long  inter- 
vals that  the  total  number  of  such  major  climatic  "revolu- 
tions" was  too  small  to  account  for  more  than  a  very  insig- 
nificant portion  of  evolutionary  history. 


322  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

To  recapitulate  what  has  already  been  said,  if  drastic  cli- 
matic and  geographical  change  is  the  most  obvious  factor 
to  which  to  look  for  changes  in  life  forms,  then  it  is  to  the 
acceleration  of  that  factor  that  we  must  look  for  the  accelera- 
tion of  evolution.  In  the  previous  chapters  we  have  been  led 
again  and  again  by  the  force  of  the  evidence  to  the  concept 
of  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust.  There  is  no  reasonable 
doubt  as  to  the  effect  that  such  displacements,  at  relatively 
short  intervals,  would  have  on  the  tempo  of  evolution.  They 
could  not  fail  enormously  to  accelerate  the  several  aspects  of 
the  evolutionary  process.  Let  us  now  examine  some  of  these 
special  aspects  in  more  detail. 

Wright  has  pointed  out  that  the  rate  of  evolutionary 
change  may  have  been  accelerated  at  various  times  through 
the  mass  transformation  of  one  kind  of  plant  or  animal  into 
another  (115:314).  This  requires  that  all  over  the  area  of 
distribution  of  the  life  form  in  question  there  must  be  strong 
pressure  for  change  in  the  same  direction.  This  means  that 
similar  new  varieties  would  appear  simultaneously  and  inde- 
pendently in  countless  localities  or  that  well-adapted  new 
varieties  would  spread  and  become  established  rapidly.  Quite 
obviously  this  would  tend  to  accelerate  evolution. 

But  how  would  such  mass  transformation  be  brought 
about?  It  could  only  result  from  profound  transformation  of 
the  environment.  The  required  change  would  have  to  be 
general  and  would  have  to  tend  in  the  same  direction  for  a 
considerable  period  of  time.  No  short-range  fluctuations  and, 
above  all,  no  merely  local  climatic  changes  would  suffice.  A 
displacement  of  the  crust  appears  to  meet  all  these  require- 
ments. For  a  period  of  many  thousands  of  years,  some  areas, 
moving  toward  the  equator,  would  be  growing  warmer; 
others,  moving  toward  the  poles,  would  be  growing  colder. 
In  the  areas  moving  toward  the  equator  (not  necessarily 
reaching  the  equator,  however,  or  even  the  tropics)  the  in- 
crease of  sunlight  would  mean  more  luxuriant  life  condi- 
tions; for  many  species  this  might  mean  increased  food 
supplies  and  an  extended  distribution.  It  would  also  be  likely 


LIFE  323 

to  mean  increased  competition  with  other  forms.  Many 
effects  would  depend  upon  whether  the  displacement  carried 
the  area  in  question  into  the  wet  tropics  or  into  the  dry  horse 
latitudes,  or  merely  from  an  arctic  into  a  temperate  climate. 
Meanwhile,  of  course,  in  areas  displaced  poleward,  opposite 
trends  would  exist;  here  the  forms  of  life  would  have  to  adapt 
to  diminishing  light,  to  increased  cold,  to  decreased  food 
supplies. 

What  is  important  is  that  these  changes  of  climate  would 
apply  over  great  areas  of  the  earth.  In  one  movement  of  the 
crust,  two  opposite  quarters  of  the  earth's  surface  would  be 
moving  equatorward  while  two  others  were  moving  pole- 
ward. Thus  the  climatic  changes  would  be  in  the  same  direc- 
tion over  very  great  areas:  the  entire  distribution,  perhaps, 
of  many  plants  and  animals.  Mass  transformation  of  life 
forms  might  therefore  be  expected  to  occur;  not  mass  trans- 
formations of  all  life  forms,  of  course,  but  merely  one  or  two 
short  steps  in  the  mass  transformation  of  one  or  a  few  kinds 
of  plants  or  animals.  New  varieties  might  be  established  in 
great  numbers,  during  a  single  movement  of  the  crust;  but 
by  this  I  do  not  mean  to  imply  that  many  new  "species" 
would  be.  The  latter  may  be  the  end  results  of  a  considerable 
number  of  displacements  of  the  crust.  I  hope  that  the  reader 
will  not  ask  me  to  define  "species."  In  this  book  I  use  the 
term  simply  to  denote  forms  of  life  that  are  reasonably  dis- 
tinct and  relatively  permanent. 

We  must  remember  that  the  different  areas  of  the  earth's 
surface  would  be  unequally  shifted  in  a  crust  displacement. 
I  have  explained  (Introduction)  that  the  amount  of  the  dis- 
placement would  depend  on  whether  an  area  was  near  to,  or 
distant  from,  the  meridian  of  displacement.  Selection  pres- 
sures would  vary  accordingly. 

Since  we  consider  displacements  to  have  taken  place  in 
short  periods  of  the  order  of  10  or  20  thousand  years,  it  seems 
likely  that  most  plants  and  animals  in  areas  radically  dis- 
placed by  a  given  movement  would  be  unlikely  to  succeed 
in  adapting.  Some  would  migrate  into  areas  having  climates 


324  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

similar  to  their  accustomed  climates.  Some  would  disappear. 
Some  would  develop  varieties  adapted  to  changed  conditions. 
Even  though  there  would  be  no  wholesale  creation  of  new 
plants  and  animals,  the  age-long  process  of  change  would 
have  received  an  acceleration. 

Another  important,  generally  accepted  requirement  for 
evolution,  as  already  suggested,  besides  climatic  change,  is  geo- 
graphical isolation  to  permit  the  development  of  new  vari- 
eties. Geneticists  agree  that  the  larger  the  population  of  a 
given  sort  of  plant  or  animal,  the  harder  it  is  for  a  new  variety 
to  get  established,  because  crossbreeding  tends  to  destroy  the 
new  variety.  If,  however,  populations  are  cut  off  from  each 
other,  and  are  reduced  in  numbers,  a  new  variant  has  a  much 
better  chance  to  become  dominant,  and  establish  itself  as  a 
variety  in  that  locality.  As  already  pointed  out,  crust  dis- 
placements can  account  for  the  alternation  of  conditions  of 
geographical  isolation  and  intercommunication  at  the  tempo 
required  to  account  for  evolution,  because  they  can  account 
for  rapid,  recurrent  changes  of  sea  level.  Let  us  now  visualize 
the  consequences  of  a  displacement  of  the  crust  resulting  in  a 
subsidence  of  a  continental  area  displaced  equatorwards.  Let 
us  suppose  a  moderate  subsidence  of  a  few  hundred  feet  only, 
over  a  period  of  a  few  thousand  years.  The  result,  of  course, 
would  be  the  deep  intrusion  of  the  sea  into  the  continent. 
The  sea  would  invade  valleys,  cutting  off  one  part  of  the 
mainland  from  another,  and  creating  islands  and  island 
groups.  Many  populations  of  the  same  kind  of  plant  or  ani- 
mal would  thus  be  isolated,  and  left  for  many  thousands  of 
years  to  develop  and  establish  new  variant  forms. 

Let  us  suppose  many  new  varieties  to  have  become  estab- 
lished in  the  islands,  and  in  areas  of  the  mainland  separated 
from  each  other  by  tongues  of  the  sea.  The  next  requirement 
of  evolution  is  that  these  new  varieties  should  be  brought 
into  competition  and  that  the  best  adapted  of  them  should 
be  disseminated  into  more  varied  habitats.  This  might  be 
brought  about  by  a  new  movement  of  the  crust,  such  as 
would  displace  this  area  poleward.  The  area  will  now  be  up- 


LIFE  .325 

lifted,  the  sea  will  withdraw,  and  the  life  forms  formerly 
isolated  will  mingle  and  enter  a  phase  of  competition. 

The  situation  that  compels  the  adaptation  of  the  forms  of 
life  to  colder,  drier  climates  (poleward  displacement)  also  will 
adapt  the  forms  of  life  to  higher  elevations,  to  mountain 
heights.  Thus,  if  we  consider  all  the  effects  of  crust  displace- 
ment, both  toward  the  equator  and  toward  the  poles,  we  can 
see  that  crust  displacement  constitutes  the  most  powerful 
engine  imaginable  for  forcing  life  forms  to  adapt  to  all 
possible  habitats. 


-/.  The  Distribution  of  Species 

Another  important  question  is  the  problem  of  the  origin  of 
the  present  and  past  distribution  of  species  over  the  face  of 
the  earth.  Darwin  and  Wallace  attempted  to  explain  the 
numerous  difficulties  in  this  field,  but  their  explanations 
have,  in  general,  become  less  and  less  satisfactory  with  the 
passing  years.  These  are  the  questions: 

a.  How  did  certain  species  cross  wide  oceans  to  become 
established  on  different  continents? 

b.  What  accounts  for  the  richness  of  some  islands,  and  the 
impoverishment  of  others,  with  respect  to  their  fauna  and 
flora? 

c.  How  did  many  kinds  of  animals  and  plants  get  dis- 
tributed from  the  north  temperate  to  the  south  temperate 
zones,  or  from  one  polar  zone  to  another,  across  the  tropics? 

d.  Why  are  certain  species  of  fresh-water  fish,  inhabiting 
the  lakes  and  rivers  of  Europe,  also  found  in  the  lakes  and 
rivers  of  North  America? 

Some  of  the  answers  to  these  puzzling  questions  will  al- 
ready be  clear  from  what  has  been  said  about  land  bridges. 
Land  bridges,  or  sunken  continents,  are  obviously  necessary 
to  explain  many  of  these  distributions  between  continents 
and  between  continents  and  islands.  Sunken  continents  have 
already  been  discussed  (Chapter  V).  Here  I  would  like  to 


526  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

discuss  the  situation  that  confronts  us  if  we  are  not  allowed 
to  postulate  sunken  continents  or  land  bridges. 

If  we  cannot  find  an  acceptable  mechanism  to  account  for 
the  creation  and  destruction  of  land  bridges  (or  sunken  conti- 
nents) we  are  forced  back  upon  the  ingenious  '  'sweepstakes" 
idea,  which  has  been  much  overworked,  as  an  explanation 
of  the  distribution  of  species.  This  idea  arose  because  it  was 
observed  that  sea  birds,  or  migratory  birds,  may  carry  the 
seeds  of  plants  or  the  eggs  of  insects  from  continent  to  conti- 
nent, and  that  some  species  manage  to  cross,  by  chance, 
bodies  of  water  on  floating  objects  such  as  logs  or  even  ice. 
By  conveniently  ignoring  about  nine  tenths  of  the  evidence, 
this  idea  has  been  given  considerable  importance.  Even 
though  many  species  have  migrated  in  this  way,  the  idea  is  no 
substitute  for  land  bridges.  Nor,  it  may  be  added,  is  one  land 
bridge,  at  Behring  Strait,  able  to  do  the  work  of  explaining 
the  infinite  number  of  plant  and  animal  migrations  in  all 
climatic  zones  in  all  geological  periods.  Many  land  bridges 
are  required,  and  for  these  an  explanation  is  necessary.  The 
theory  presented  in  this  book,  however,  can  explain  the  crea- 
tion and  destruction  of  land  bridges  (and  sunken  continents), 
and  therefore  it  can  explain  the  distribution  of  species  across 
large  bodies  of  water. 

The  impoverishment  of  certain  island  faunas  and  floras  as 
compared  with  others  may  be  understood  as  follows.  Some 
of  these  islands  may  have  rich  faunas  and  floras  because,  in 
recent  time,  they  have  had  land  connections  with  adjacent 
continents.  This  would  be  true  of  the  Philippines,  of  Java, 
of  Sumatra,  and  of  numerous  other  islands  in  that  area, 
whose  former  continental  connections  with  either  Asia  or 
Australia  have  been  argued  for  by  Wallace  (446)  and  others. 
It  is  not  a  question  of  showing  that  the  species  in  these 
islands  came  from  the  continents;  it  is  simply  true  that  there 
were  land  connections,  and  that  the  species  wandered  back 
and  forth;  we  don't  know  where  they  originated. 

An  island  like  Java  can  have  a  rich  fauna  and  flora  not  only 
because  of  having  had  rather  recent  connections  with  the 


LIFE  327 

continent  of  Asia,  but  also  because  it  is  mountainous.  This 
makes  it  possible,  supposing  at  some  time  an  equatorward 
displacement  of  the  island  into  a  warmer  latitude,  for  tem- 
perate climate  species  to  ascend  into  the  mountains  and  so 
survive.  Such  variety  of  climatic  conditions,  due  to  differ- 
ences of  altitude  of  different  parts  of  the  island,  would  favor 
the  preservation  of  a  rich  flora  and  fauna. 

Let  us  contrast  with  Java  the  situation  of  a  small  island  or 
island  group,  such  as  the  Bermudas,  the  Azores,  or  the  Ca- 
naries, where,  in  general,  we  find  the  life  forms  to  be 
impoverished.  These  islands,  often  far  from  the  nearest 
continent,  may  have  been  separated  from  them,  of  course,  for 
long  periods  of  time.  Now  let  us  suppose  one  of  them,  say 
the  Azores,  to  be  displaced  through  about  2,000  miles  of 
latitude  in  one  movement  of  the  crust,  in  either  direction. 
Where  will  the  indigenous  species  go?  Obviously,  there  will 
be  no  refuge  for  them;  therefore,  many  of  them  will  succumb. 
Subsequently,  the  sea  will  be  an  effective  barrier  to  the  re- 
population  of  the  islands  from  the  mainland. 

As  to  the  distribution  of  life  forms  across  the  climatic 
zones,  referred  to  as  "bipolar  mirrorism,"  Darwin  proposed 
an  explanation  in  Chapter  12  of  the  Origin  of  Species  that 
can  no  longer  be  accepted.  He  supposed,  %  first,  that  glacial 
periods  alternated  in  the  Northern  and  Southern  Hemi- 
spheres. This  idea  has  long  since  been  given  up.  Then,  Dar- 
win reasoned  that  when  there  was  an  ice  age  in  the  Northern 
Hemisphere,  the  climatic  zones  would  be  displaced  south- 
ward, and  the  temperate  zone  species  would  migrate  south- 
ward. When  that  ice  age  ended,  and  the  climate  warmed  up, 
the  temperate  species  that  had  migrated  southward  would 
now  ascend  into  the  mountains,  where  they  would  survive, 
in  the  tropic  zone.  There  are,  of  course,  mountains  in  the 
tropics  high  enough  to  be  snow-capped  the  year  around; 
on  these  even  arctic  plants  might  exist. 

The  next  step,  according  to  Darwin,  would  be  the  onset 
of  an  ice  age  in  the  Southern  Hemisphere.  Now  the  tempera- 
ture in  the  southern  tropics  would  fall,  and  become  temper- 


328  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

ate,  and  the  temperate  species  wcmld  descend  from  their 
mountains  and  migrate  across  the  valleys  southward  to  the 
south  temperate  zone.  In  this  way  the  migration  of  the  species 
from  the  northern  to  the  southern  temperate  zone  would 
be  accomplished. 

Now  this  idea  of  the  species  clambering  up  and  down  the 
mountainsides  in  response  to  the  changing  weather  is  a  good 
one,  and  gives  us  one  key  to  the  problem.  Where  Darwin 
went  wrong  was  in  his  alternating  ice  age  theory;  he  could 
hardly  be  blamed,  in  view  of  the  prevailing  ignorance  about 
ice  ages.  Darwin,  of  course,  lived  at  a  time  when  people  were 
first  getting  used  to  the  idea  of  ice  ages.  But  if  Darwin  was 
wrong,  if  ice  ages  do  not  regularly  alternate  in  the  Northern 
and  Southern  Hemispheres,  how  do  we  explain  bipolar 
mirrorism?  For  some  decades  now,  glaciologists  have  been 
holding  grimly  to  the  theory  that  ice  ages  were  always  simul- 
taneous in  the  two  hemispheres.  In  maintaining  this  view, 
they  have  ignored  the  fact  that  they  have  made  mincemeat 
of  Darwin's  explanation  of  bipolar  mirrorism.  But  this  does 
not  concern  them.  They  are  concerned  with  explaining  ice 
ages,  not  with  the  distribution  of  species.  They  have  sug- 
gested no  alternative  explanation  for  the  migration  of  species 
across  the  climatjc  zones.  Instead,  they  have  constructed  a 
theory  that  puts  the  migration  of  species,  and  even  the  sur- 
vival of  tropical  species,  into  the  realm  of  sheer  impossibility. 

They  insist,  we  remember,  that  the  temperature  of  the 
whole  earth  was  simultaneously  lowered  in  glacial  periods. 
We  have  seen  that  at  various  times  in  the  past  great  conti- 
nental icecaps  have  existed  at  sea  level  within  the  tropics, 
and  even  on  the  equator  itself.  I  have  already  pointed  out 
that  if  the  world  temperature  had  been  lowered  enough  to 
permit  a  continental  icecap  in  the  Congo,  there  would  have 
been  no  place  of  refuge  for  tropical  species  of  plants  and 
animals.  Nowhere  along  the  circle  of  the  equator  around  the 
earth  would  any  tropical  species  have  survived.  This  would 
be  equally  true  of  land  and  sea  forms  of  life. 

Bipolar  mirrorism,  however,  presents  no  problems  if  we 


LIFE  329 

reconsider  it  in  terms  of  displacements  of  the  crust.  One 
movement,  let  us  suppose,  takes  the  Rocky  Mountains  2,000 
miles  to  the  south.  The  species  climb  higher.  Later,  in  a  series 
of  movements  of  the  crust  (not  always,  of  course,  in  the  same 
direction),  the  Rockies  finally  end  up  south  of  the  equator, 
in  a  temperate  climate.  Now  the  species  climb  down,  and 
occupy  the  temperate  valleys  of  the  Southern  Hemisphere. 
The  mountain  chain  has  functioned  as  a  ferryboat,  simply 
transporting  species  back  and  forth. 

At  this  point  it  is  interesting  to  reflect  on  how  useful  it  is 
to  have  these  high  mountain  ranges.  A  low  mountain  range 
would  never  do.  It  could  never  ferry  a  load  of  species  across 
the  tropical  zone. 


5.  The  Periods  of  Revolutionary  Change  in  Life  Forms 

The  reader  may  have  gained  the  impression  that,  while  cer- 
tain aspects  of  evolution  have  escaped  satisfactory  explana- 
tion, at  least  the  process  itself  has  continued  evenly  through 
all  time.  To  this  reader  it  may  come  as  a  shock,  as  it  did  to 
me,  to  learn  that  this  is  not  at  all  the  case.  There  have  been 
remarkable  variations  in  the  rate  of  evolution.  For  long 
periods  it  has  marked  time,  and  then  some  force,  hitherto 
unidentified,  has  initiated  a  phase  of  rapid  change,  a  revolu- 
tion changing  so  many  forms  of  plant  and  animal  life  as  to 
alter  the  general  complexion  of  life  on  the  earth.  All  paleon- 
tologists appear  to  agree  on  this  point.  Dr.  Simpson  uses  the 
term  "Virenzperiod"  to  define  the  periods  of  rapid  change. 
Others  refer  to  "explosive"  phases  of  evolution  or  to  "quan- 
tum evolution."  It  must  be  understood  that  development 
during  these  periods  is  rapid  only  relatively;  new  forms  are 
still  not  created  overnight. 

One  phenomenon  that  frequently  occurs  during  these 
periods  is  termed  "adaptive  radiation."  This  is  a  kind  of  ex- 
plosion in  which  one  form  (or  species)  rapidly  gives  rise  to 
dozens,  scores,  or  even  hundreds  of  new  forms  apparently  at 


330  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

one  and  the  same  time.  How  is  this  phenomenon  accounted 
for? 

We  must  distinguish  between  the  biological  process  and 
the  circumstances  that  cause  it  to  occur.  The  process  is  easily 
explained.  Let  us  suppose  that  a  form  of  plant  or  animal  is 
widely  spread  over  a  considerable  area.  Its  total  population 
may  include  some  millions  of  individuals;  over  its  whole 
distribution  there  will  be  local  variations  in  the  environ- 
ment, and  consequently  there  will  be  selection  pressures 
operating  simultaneously  but  in  different  directions  on  differ- 
ent parts  of  the  population  in  different  habitats.  New  vari- 
eties of  the  plant  or  animal  will  tend  to  appear  to  take 
advantage  of  special  opportunities  offered  by  particular  local 
environments.  This  sort  of  thing  is  always  going  on,  but  it 
does  not,  by  itself,  produce  explosions  of  adaptive  radiation, 

Something  more  is  required.  Normally,  a  new  variety  of 
any  form  has  to  compete  with  other  forms  already  in  posses- 
sion of  the  necessary  supplies  of  food,  light,  and  water.  The 
situation  that  has  the  particular  combination  of  these  things 
required  by  a  given  plant  or  animal  is  referred  to  as  its  life, 
or  ecological,  niche.  Naturally,  if  this  niche  is  already  effec- 
tively occupied  the  spread  of  the  new  variety  is  restricted, 
As  an  analogy,  think  of  a  garden  in  which  you  have  set  out 
one  hundred  expensive  strawberry  plants  of  a  totally  new 
variety,  just  before  being  called  away  for  two  months  on 
urgent  business  requiring  your  presence  in  a  foreign  country 
What  now  happens?  Weeds  immediately  take  over  the  niche 
you  had  hoped  to  preserve  (artificially)  for  the  spread  of  the 
strawberry  plants.  Their  spread  is  restricted,  and  their  sur- 
vival may  be  threatened. 

In  nature  what  seems  to  be  required  to  permit  the  ver) 
rapid  dissemination  of  many  new  variant  forms  of  the  orig 
inal  plant  or  animal  is  an  absence  of  competition.  Empty  life 
niches  are  required.  The  question  is,  How  is  an  empty  life 
niche  produced?  Occasionally,  of  course,  it  may  have  beer 
there  from  the  beginning;  it  may  never  have  been  occupied 
because,  presumably,  there  never  was  any  form  of  life  thai 


LIFE  331 

could  utilize  it,  but  after  two  billion  or  more  years  of  evolu- 
tion, such  primeval  biological  vacuums  are  few  indeed.  Life 
niches  have,  in  general,  been  very  well  occupied  for  a  very 
long  time.  Something  is  required,  therefore,  to  empty  them. 

This  is  where  our  theory  comes  in.  The  effects  of  a  dis- 
placement can  be  visualized  in  two  stages.  In  the  first,  a 
movement  of  a  large  continental  area  through  many  degrees 
of  latitude  might  well  cause  a  very  general  extermination 
of  the  inhabitants.  We  have  seen  how,  in  several  instances, 
this  occurred  during  the  late  Pleistocene  (Chapter  VIII). 
The  consequence  of  the  extermination  of  many  kinds  of 
plants  and  animals  (which  is  not  to  say  their  extinction,  for 
many  of  them  might  survive  in  other  areas)  would  be  to  leave 
their  life  niches  empty. 

The  second  stage,  initiated  by  a  new  movement  of  the 
crust,  would  be  marked  by  the  opening  up  of  avenues  for  the 
immigration  of  life  forms  from  other  land  areas.  Life  forms 
entering  the  continent  would  now  enjoy  a  field  day.  They 
would  multiply;  they  would  occupy  rapidly  a  tremendous 
area  and  all  manner  of  habitats;  they  would  produce  variant 
forms,  and  the  variant  forms  would  occupy  appropriate 
niches.  Thus  explosive  evolution  would  take  place.  The  new 
forms  need  not  always  be  immigrants;  they  could  equally 
well  be  local  survivors  of  the  period  of  depopulation,  of  the 
displacement,  who  had  somehow  managed  to  hold  their  own 
under  unfavorable  conditions.  It  seems  highly  probable, 
indeed,  that  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  are  the  ex- 
planation of  explosive  evolution. 

We  have  already  made  mention  of  the  fact  that  an  interrela- 
tionship between  the  revolutionary  periods  in  evolution  and 
the  critical  phases  of  change  in  other  geological  areas  has 
been  noted  by  many  observers.  Lull,  for  example,  says, 

.  .  .  There  are  times  of  quickening,  the  expression  points  of  evo- 
lution, which  are  almost  invariably  coincident  with  some  great  geolog- 
ical change,  and  the  correspondence  is  so  exact  and  so  frequent  that 
the  laws  of  chance  may  not  be  invoked  as  an  explanation  (278:687). 


332  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

Umbgrove  mentions  two  specific  examples  of  this  phe- 
nomenon: 

The  most  important  point  of  all,  as  far  as  we  are  concerned,  is 
that  the  two  major  periods  of  strong  differentiation  of  plant  life 
correspond  with  two  major  periods  of  mountain-building  and  glacia- 
tion  of  the  Upper  Paleozoic  and  Pleistocene  (429:292). 

The  same  thing  is  described  by  Professor  Erling  Dorf,  of 
Princeton  (349:575-91).  We  need  not  take  too  seriously  the 
small  number  of  turning  points  mentioned  by  them  for  the 
reason  that  everything,  after  all,  is  relative.  The  turning 
points  mentioned  by  Umbgrove  might  turn  out  to  have  been, 
in  some  respects,  the  most  important  turning  points  in  the 
history  of  life,  and  yet  there  may  have  been  a  hundred  lesser, 
but  still  very  important,  turning  points. 

Geologists  who  have  sought  an  explanation  of  the  rela- 
tionship between  biological  and  geological  change  have,  in 
some  cases,  favored  the  idea  that  geological  change,  such  as 
the  formation  of  new  mountain  ranges,  might  have  caused 
both  ice  ages  and  biological  change.  We  have  seen  that  this 
will  not  account  for  ice  ages.  We  have  also  seen  that  geolo- 
gists now  generally  admit  their  failure  to  explain  mountain 
building.  It  is  unsatisfactory  to  attempt  to  explain  the  known 
by  the  unknown;  it  will  not  do  to  drag  in  mountain  build- 
ing as  the  cause  of  evolution,  when  the  former  also  is 
unexplained. 

Displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  appear  to  be  the  con- 
necting link  between  these  different  processes:  they  explain, 
at  one  and  the  same  time,  ice  ages,  mountain  formation,  and 
the  significant  turning  points  of  evolution. 


6.  The  Extinction  of  Species 

It  has  already  been  shown  (Chapter  VIII)  that  our  theory  can 
provide  an  explanation  for  the  extinction  of  species.  Some 
further  discussion  of  this  problem  is,  however,  required. 
It  has  been  suggested  that  the  history  of  any  particular 


LIFE  333 

species  can  be  compared  with  the  life  of  an  individual,  with 
its  phases  of  youth,  maturity,  and  old  age.  Thus,  the  ex- 
plosive period  is  the  youth  of  a  species,  the  period  of  quiet 
and  prosperous  enjoyment  of  its  life  niche  is  maturity,  and 
its  degenerative  phase  is  its  old  age.  Finally,  extinction  re- 
sults from  the  exhaustion  of  the  vital  force  of  the  species. 
This  theory  assumes  an  innate  cause,  and  a  natural  order  for 
the  succession  of  the  phases. 

This  idea  has  been  widely  disseminated,  and  in  one  form 
or  another  it  has  served  to  confuse  all  the  issues  and  obscure 
the  known  facts.  It  is  one  more  of  those  philosophical  abstrac- 
tions that  people  resort  to  who  come  up  against  an  unsolved 
problem  and  cannot  stand  the  psychological  tension  of  per- 
severing in  the  search  for  truth.  It  is  important  that  the 
essentials  of  this  matter  should  be  made  clear. 

In  the  first  place,  the  idea  that  a  species  is  analogous  to  an 
individual,  and  must  go  through  similar  phases,  is  a  modern 
revival  of  the  Scholastic  logic  of  the  Middle  Ages,  like  the 
microcosm-macrocosm  analogy  (according  to  which  some 
people  have  recently  argued  that  since  planets  are  satellites 
of  the  sun,  and  electrons  are  satellites  of  the  nucleus  of  the 
atom,  then  planets  are  exactly  like  electrons,  and  must  obey 
the  same  laws  of  physics).  The  alleged  vital  force,  which  is 
supposed  to  set  a  preordained  limit  to  the  life  of  a  species, 
completely  escapes  scientific  observation  and  experiment. 
It  is  not  only  a  mere  assumption,  it  is  also  an  unjustified 
assumption. 

The  facts  of  paleontology  do  not  agree  with  the  analogy  of 
the  life  phases  of  a  species  with  that  of  an  individual.  In  very 
many  cases  the  same  phase  may  be  repeated  several  times  in 
the  life  of  a  species,  and  other  phases  may  be  omitted  alto- 
gether, as  we  shall  see  below.  For  this  reason  the  theory 
brings  caustic  comment  from  Dr.  Simpson.  After  discussing 
the  two  phases  of  adaptive  radiation  (youth)  and  "intrazonal 
adaptation"  (establishment  in  a  stable  but  limited  environ- 
ment), which  is  analogous  to  maturity— which  often  do  follow 
each  other  in  this  order— he  explains  their  relationship  thus: 


334  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

The  sequence  radiation-intrazonal  evolution  is  usual,  simply  be- 
cause radiation  does  not  occur  unless  there  are  diverse  zones  within 
which  evolution  will  follow.  Occasionally,  nevertheless,  something 
happens  to  close  the  zones  so  soon  that  radiation  is  curtailed,  or  the 
intrazonal  phase  is  even  shorter  than  the  radiation.  The  camariate 
crinoids,  for  instance,  seem  to  have  been  in  the  full  swing  of  a  radia- 
tion when  they  all  became  extinct  in  the  Carboniferous.  .  .  .  (390: 
232). 

We  note  that  Dr.  Simpson  says,  "something  happens."  What 
happens?  He  does  not  care  to  suggest  what  might  happen  to 
close  the  zones,  to  curtail  the  radiation,  to  destroy  the  species. 
No  one  has  ever  suggested  a  reasonable  explanation  of  these 
things,  but  they  can  be  understood  as  effects  of  repeated  dis- 
placements of  the  crust. 

Dr.  Simpson  has  remarked  elsewhere  that  he  does  not  ob- 
ject to  the  analogy  of  the  species  and  the  individual,  provided 
it  may  be  allowed  that  youth  may  follow  maturity,  and  may 
occur  more  than  once! 

Not  only  may  phases  occur  in  the  wrong  order,  and  be 
repeated,  but  also  some  may  be  omitted  altogether.  This 
seems  particularly  true  of  the  last,  or  so-called  senile,  period. 
No  concept  has  had  so  wide  a  currency  with  so  little  support 
in  evidence  as  that  of  the  alleged  degeneration  of  species. 
The  reasoning  behind  it  is  essentially  specious:  if  a  form  of 
life  becomes  extinct,  and  if  some  "exaggerated"  trait  can  be 
pointed  to,  which  might  have  produced  this  extinction,  then 
it  is  claimed  that  the  species  was  degenerate.  This  is,  of 
course,  merely  hindsight,  because  it  ignores  the  fact  that 
some  of  the  oddest  creatures  in  the  world  have  lasted  for 
millions  of  years  and  still  exist.  It  is  true  that  some  kinds  of 
plants  and  animals  become  adapted  to  very  narrowly  special- 
ized environments,  so  that  an  almost  imperceptible  change 
in  the  environment  may  destroy  them.  These  forms  may,  if 
you  like,  be  called  overspecialized,  but  they  cannot  be  called 
degenerate.  No  inner  process  of  decay  has  taken  place  in  the 
organism.  Its  extinction  results  from  the  external  circum- 
stance that  destroys  its  relationship  with  its  environment.  Is 
the  specialist,  who  has  spent  his  entire  life  in  the  study  of 


LIFE  335 

the  pre-Cambrian,  and  therefore  is  incapable  of  making  his 
living  in  any  field  outside  of  geology,  or  even  outside  pre- 
Cambrian  geology,  degenerate?  If  he  starves  to  death,  is  his 
extinction  due  to  degeneration?  The  reasoning  is  analogous. 
But,  supposing  that  we  allow  a  phenomenon  of  degenera- 
tion in  species,  it  is  still  true  that  most  species  disappear  with- 
out showing  any  indication  whatever  of  a  decline  of  their 
'Vital  force/'  The  majority  of  them  are  cut  off  in  the  vigor 
of  maturity,  or  in  "youth,"  as  in  the  case  of  the  camariate 
crinoids.  Moreover,  there  is  no  rule  as  to  the  relative  length 
of  the  different  periods.  Dr.  Simpson  remarks: 

Diversification  may  be  brief  or  prolonged,  and  may  be  of  limited 
scope  or  may  ramify  into  the  most  extraordinarily  varied  zones  cover- 
ing a  breadth  of  total  adaptation  that  would  have  been  totally  unpre- 
dictable and  incredible  if  we  were  aware  only  of  the  beginning  of 
the  process  (390:222-23). 

Again,  he  says, 

.  .  .  Episodes  of  proliferation  may  come  early,  middle  or  late  in 
the  history  of  a  group.  This  confirms  the  conclusion  that  adaptive 
radiation  is  episodic  but  not  cyclic  (390:235). 

We  have  already  noted  that  Darwin  recognized  that  the 
ordinary  competition  of  species  could  not  account  for  the 
mass  extinction  of  whole  groups,  of  which,  even  then,  there 
were  many  known  instances  in  the  fossil  record.  Since  his 
day,  paleontologists  have  found  very  many  more  cases  of 
apparently  well-adapted  species,  which  in  some  cases  had 
flourished  for  tens  of  millions  of  years  and  yet  suddenly  dis- 
appeared, sometimes  leaving  their  life  niches  empty,  and  at 
other  times  giving  way  to  inferior  species  as  their  successors. 
For  the  Pleistocene  alone,  the  last  million  years,  as  we  have 
seen,  the  examples  of  this  include  the  mammoth,  the  masto- 
don, the  sabertooth  cat,  the  giant  beaver,  the  giant  sloth,  the 
giant  bison,  and  countless  extinct  varieties  of  still  existing 
forms  like  horses,  deer,  camels,  peccaries,  armadillos,  wolves, 
bears,  etc.  Dr.  Simpson,  in  discussing  the  extinction  of  the 
dinosaurs,  remarks: 


336  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

It  should  be  emphasized  that  these  mass  extinctions  are  not  in- 
stantaneous, or  even  brief,  events.  They  extend  over  periods  of  tens 
of  millions  of  years.  .  .  .  This  makes  the  phenomenon  all  the  more 
mysterious,  because  we  have  to  think  of  environmental  changes  that 
not  only  affected  a  great  many  different  groups  in  different  environ- 
ments, but  also  did  so  very  slowly  and  very  persistently.  The  only 
general  and  true  statement  that  can  now  be  made  about,  say,  the  ex- 
tinction of  the  dinosaurs  is  that  they  all  lost  adaptation  in  the  course 
of  some  long  environmental  change  the  nature  of  which  is  entirely 
unknown  (390:302). 

If  the  dinosaurs  lost  adaptation,  it  was  not  because  they 
changed.  The  same  is  true  of  the  sabertooth  cat,  which  had  a 
life  span  of  40,000,000  years  and,  according  to  Simpson,  was 
apparently  as  well  adapted  at  the  end  of  that  period  as  at 
the  beginning  (392:43-44).  The  gradual  elimination  of  the 
dinosaurs  can  be  understood  as  the  result  of  constant  shift- 
ings  of  the  earth's  crust,  which  eliminated  these  reptiles  first 
in  one  area  and  then  in  another.  No  doubt,  dinosaurs  re- 
peatedly reoccupied  areas  from  which  they  had  previously 
been  eliminated,  but  eventually— perhaps  much  more  re- 
cently than  some  people  think— they  were  destroyed.  Being 
cold-blooded  creatures,  of  course,  they  would  find  it  quite 
intolerable  to  be  shifted  into  the  cold  zones,  but  there  is  not 
the  slightest  reason  to  think  they  were  degenerate.  Simpson 
attacks  the  entire  idea  of  degeneration  of  species  (392:72,  81). 
He  quotes  Rensch: 

In  innumerable  cases  lineages  become  extinct  without  there  being 
recognizable  in  the  last  forms  any  sort  of  morphological  or  patholog- 
ical degenerative  phenomena  (390:292). 

Professor  Dodson  gives  a  good  example  of  the  piecemeal 
extinction  of  species.  He  cites  the  case  of  the  mastodonts, 
relatives  of  the  elephants,  which  became  extinct  first  in  the 
old  world  and  then  in  the  new  (115:371).  Other  examples 
could  be  cited  from  the  Pleistocene,  when  many  species  be- 
came extinct  in  the  Americas,  while  their  close  relatives,  such 
as  horses,  camels,  and  various  kinds  of  elephants,  survived 
in  the  Eastern  Hemisphere.  Now  one  might  ask  the  question, 


LIFE  337 

If  a  species  becomes  extinct  on  one  continent  but  continues 
to  flourish  on  another,  is  it  or  is  it  not  senile?  What  stage  is 
it  in  then?  We  can  understand  all  these  events  as  the  results 
of  piecemeal  destructions  of  animal  populations  in  crust 
displacements.  We  can  see  in  them  the  process  of  the  creation 
of  empty  environments,  preparing  the  way  for  a  new  stage 
of  explosive  evolution.  Simpson  directly  suggests  the  connec- 
tion between  these  two  things: 

.  .  .  Opportunity  may  come  as  an  inheritance  from  the  dead,  the 
extinct,  who  bequeath  adaptive  zones  free  from  competitors.  Jurassic 
Virenz  for  ammonites  followed  extinction  of  all  but  one  family,  per- 
haps all  but  one  genus,  of  Triassic  ammonites;  early  Tertiary  mam- 
malian Virenz  followed  mysterious  decimation  of  the  Cretaceous 
reptiles.  .  .  .  (392:73)- 

There  is  another  question  regarding  the  extinction  of 
species  that  should  be  answered.  Perhaps  it  will  be  asked,  If 
crust  displacements  killed  off  the  dinosaurs,  why  did  they 
not  eliminate  also  the  very  numerous  other  reptiles  that  still 
survive?  If  the  last  displacement  at  the  close  of  the  Pleisto- 
cene eliminated  the  mammoth  and  certain  other  mammals 
from  America,  why  did  other  animals  survive?  The  answer 
is,  essentially,  that  it  is  a  question  of  the  mathematical 
chances  of  survival.  It  is  a  question  of  the  numbers  of  the 
animals,  the  geographical  extent  and  variety  of  their  habitats, 
their  particular  individual  aptitudes,  and  the  ever-present 
factor  of  sheer  accident.  It  may  be  true  that  size  militated 
against  some  species,  but  it  may  have  worked  in  favor  of 
others.  The  very  largest  animal  of  all— the  whale— still  sur- 
vives. Elephants  compare  favorably  with  all  but  the  very 
largest  extinct  mammals. 


7.  The  Gaps  in  the  Fossil  Record 

One  further  point  remains  for  our  consideration.  A  feature 
of  the  fossil  record  that  greatly  impressed  Darwin  was  the 
curious  way  in  which  species  appear,  full-blown,  with  no 


338  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

indication  of  transition  forms,  much  like  the  mythical  birth 
of  Venus.  The  paleontologist  suddenly  comes  upon  a  species, 
or  a  whole  group  of  them,  which  have  not  been  found  be- 
fore. They  are  all  fully  evolved;  they  obviously  have  had 
long  histories;  there  must  have  been  hundreds  or  even  thou- 
sands of  ancestral  forms  for  them;  but  absolutely  no  trace  of 
the  preceding  forms  can  be  found.  It  happened  this  way  with 
the  dinosaurs,  which  appeared  in  Africa,  with  a  great  many 
species  already  fully  developed,  at  the  beginning  of  the 
Mesozoic  Era.  They  seem  to  have  come,  literally,  out  of  noth- 
ing. Sometimes  ancestral  forms  of  a  particular  plant  or  ani- 
mal will  be  found  at  a  great  distance—on  another  continent, 
perhaps— but  always  there  appear  to  have  existed  many  inter- 
mediary links,  which  have  been  lost.  Even  in  the  case  of  the 
horse,  where  an  unusually  good  record  exists,  there  are  many 
missing  links. 

A  part  of  the  reason  for  this  situation  is,  of  course,  the 
imperfect  preservation  of  the  fossil  record.  There  appear  to 
be  several  reasons  for  this.  Fossilization  itself  is  a  very  rare 
event;  very  few  individuals  of  any  species  are  preserved,  and 
the  great  majority  of  all  the  species  that  have  existed  have 
disappeared  without  a  trace.  Then,  of  the  fossils  that  were 
preserved  in  the  rocks  since  the  beginning  of  the  sedimentary 
record,  about  95  per  cent  have  been  destroyed,  since  about 
that  percentage  of  all  the  sedimentary  rocks  of  the  older 
periods  has  been  eroded  away  and  redeposited,  with  conse- 
quent destruction  of  all  fossils.  Finally,  of  the  fossils  that 
have  been  preserved,  it  is  very  unlikely  that  paleontologists 
can  have  seen  and  studied  more  than  a  very  insignificant  pro- 
portion—let us  say,  to  put  the  matter  as  liberally  as  possible, 
that  they  may  have  seen  one  millionth  of  the  existing  fossils. 
Many  of  the  latter,  of  course,  are  buried  deep  in  the  earth 
or  under  the  numerous  shallow  seas,  and  will  never  be  seen. 

But  true  as  this  is,  it  does  not  quite  satisfy.  Relatively  few 
and  scattered  as  fossils  may  be,  it  is  still  to  be  wondered  at 
that  we  do  not  have  a  respectable  handful  of  reasonably  com- 
plete life  histories.  The  light  cast  on  this  matter  by  the  theory 


LIFE  339 

of  crust  displacement  is  quite  startling.  We  have  seen  that 
such  movements  would  necessitate  frequent  migrations  of 
whole  faunas  and  floras.  It  would  necessarily  follow,  from  the 
theory  of  crust  displacement,  that  species  would  as  a  rule  be 
separated  by  considerable  geographical  distances  from  the 
places  of  their  origin.  This  would  be  all  the  more  certain 
since  the  rate  of  development  of  new  forms  is  probably  very 
slow  as  compared  with  the  rate  at  which  crust  displacements 
may  occur.  It  could,  actually,  be  rather  seldom  that  one  plant 
or  animal  would  complete  much  of  its  life  history  in  the  same 
place.  The  "missing  links"  would  usually  have  been  sepa- 
rated by  great  geographical  distances  from  the  homes  of  their 
descendants.  Moreover,  the  successive  movements  of  the 
crust,  with  the  resulting  changes  in  the  distribution  of  land 
and  sea,  would  leave  much  of  the  fossil  record  under  the  pres- 
ent shallow  (or  even  deep)  seas,  and  out  of  our  reach. 


8.  Summary 

To  sum  up:  it  would  seem  that  in  crust  displacements  we 
have  the  missing  factor  that  can  bring  all  the  other  evolu- 
tionary factors  into  proper  focus  and  correct  perspective.  By 
crust  displacements  we  may  accelerate  the  tempo  of  natural 
selection,  provide  the  conditions  of  isolation  and  competition 
required  for  change  in  life  forms,  and  account  for  periods  of 
revolutionary  change,  for  the  distribution  of  species  across 
oceans  and  climatic  zones,  and  for  the  extinction  of  species. 
We  may  also  account  for  the  significant  association  of  turn- 
ing points  in  evolution  with  geological  and  climatic  changes, 
presenting  them  as  different  results  of  the  same  cause.  But  for 
crust  displacements  to  have  had  these  effects,  and  if  they  are, 
indeed,  to  account  for  the  evolution  of  species,  they  must 
have  occurred  very  often  throughout  the  history  of  the  earth. 


XI  :  CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  OF 
DISPLACEMENT 

i.  The  Logic  of  the  Evidence 

Readers  of  this  volume  may  have  reached  the  conclusion 
that  displacements  of  the  earth's  crust  have  occurred,  perhaps 
frequently,  and  very  recently  in  the  earth's  history,  and  yet 
they  may  doubt  that  the  icecaps  caused  the  displacements. 
It  may  seem  to  them  that  other  causes  may  have  brought 
about  these  effects,  or  perhaps  that  a  combination  of  causes 
has  done  so. 

There  are  several  reasons  for  concluding  that  the  cen- 
trifugal effects  of  asymmetrically  placed  icecaps  were,  in  fact, 
the  cause  of  the  displacements.  The  first  of  these  is  that  con- 
tinental icecaps  are  the  most  massive  and  the  most  rapidly 
developed  dislocations  of  mass  known  to  have  occurred  at 
any  time  on  the  earth's  surface.  All  other  known  geological 
processes  subject  to  measurement,  such  as  erosion  and  vol- 
canic activity,  are  inadequate  in  tempo  or  in  quantity  to 
produce  equal  centrifugal  effects.  No  dislocation  of  mass 
within  the  earth,  known  or  conjectured,  can  compare  quanti- 
tatively in  equal  periods  of  time  with  the  effect  of  an  icecap 
of  the  magnitude  of  the  present  icecap  in  Antarctica.  Every 
theory  so  far  advanced  to  account  for  changes  at  the  surface 
of  the  earth  (such  as  displacements  of  the  crust)  by  changes 
in  depth  have  postulated  long  periods  for  the  completion  of 
the  changes.  The  geological  evidence  presented  in  this  book 
can  be  understood  only  in  terms  of  displacements  of  the  crust 
at  very  short  intervals  during  at  least  a  large  part  of  the 
earth's  history,  with  a  most  recent  displacement  through  no 
less  than  2,000  miles  of  latitude  in  a  period  of  about  10,000 
years  at  the  end  of  the  North  American  ice  age. 

All  this  evidence  calls  for  a  large  displacing  force  that 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  341 

will  overcome  the  inertia  of  the  crust  and  its  friction  with 
the  layer  below  it,  to  continue  the  displacements  to  distances 
of  the  order  of  several  thousand  miles.  It  is  essential  to  have 
a  force  that  will  not  be  absorbed  and  exhausted  by  the  work 
of  moving  the  crust.  It  is  clear  that  the  mechanism  of  cen- 
trifugal effect  postulated  by  Campbell  can  meet  this  re- 
quirement because  the  effect  increases  in  proportion  as  the 
uncompensated  mass  of  the  icecap  is  moved  farther  from  the 
axis  of  rotation.  At  the  same  time,  as  I  have  already  men- 
tioned, a  cause  of  displacement  is  called  for  that  will  cease  to 
exert  these  centrifugal  effects  at  some  distance  from  the  pole, 
but  long  before  the  equator  is  reached.  To  accomplish  this, 
the  mechanism  must  provide  that  the  mass  responsible  for 
the  displacement  must  itself  disappear  en  route,  and,  as  we 
have  seen,  it  must  disappear  rapidly.  It  seems  that  the  melt- 
ing of  the  icecap,  as  the  movement  brings  it  into  warmer 
latitudes,  provides  not  only  a  sufficient  but  perhaps  the  only 
conceivable  method  of  explaining  the  facts. 

Campbell  has  made  this  clear  by  computing  the  increase 
of  the  centrifugal  effect  with  increasing  distance  from  the  axis 
for  the  present  Antarctic  icecap,  assuming  it  to  be  uncom- 
pensated, and  assuming  its  displacement,  without  melting, 
as  far  as  the  equator.  He  has  shown  (Table  III,  opposite  p. 
341,  and  Figure  XII,  p.  343)  that  if  the  icecap  should  be  dis- 
placed as  far  as  the  45th  parallel  of  South  Latitude,  the 
tangential  component  of  its  centrifugal  effect  would  be  mul- 
tiplied about  six  times.  After  this  point,  while  the  total 
centrifugal  effect  operating  at  right  angles  to  the  axis  con- 
tinues to  increase  until  the  equator  is  reached,  the  tangential 
component  declines,  and  yet  it  is  clear  that  the  movement, 
if  the  uncompensated  mass  itself  remains  intact,  must  con- 
tinue to  the  vicinity  of  the  equator  itself.  The  geological 
evidence  already  presented  shows  that  this  did  not  occur,  but 
that  the  movements  terminated  at  points  about  one  third  of 
the  distance  from  the  pole  to  the  equator. 

In  view  of  the  apparently  inescapable  logic  of  the  geo- 
logical evidence  and  of  the  centrifugal  mechanics,  we  must 


-- 

2r  3 


§   "8 

• 


1 


cr4   *  s  fe 

w  - 


% 

•E 


«o    rr4 
<u   <u  § 

*•§; 

o.ts-S 


§  JB-SI 

5   ffgl 

1    2 'SB 

S      p£     >  .*- 

f--S      bo  .. 

.8* '5 -si 

Qcrj   ^J*  p^ 
w    «    P 

«2    y  2  'So 

fcti    ^    CJ 

p,    <u  cu  *r3 

s  •?, 


8 


U 

ttt 


^    w    S 

^il 

s-l^ 


CO  O 

Ctf        M    *-» 


M 

w 

2 

f_l 

CJJ 

•a  a 

s 

iH 

*o 

pH 

0 

iH 

o 

iH 

1* 

s§ 

&§, 

s  s 

h 

v> 

S 

X 

g 

X 

X 

X 

X 

0 

H6 

^ 

s 

00 

OO 

d 

d 

OO 

CO 

o 

h 

tj    •- 

cti     "8 
w    ^ 


ti    2 

a« 

o 
co 


•a 


X 

tH 

X 

1-4 

X 

iH 

X 

X 

iH 

00 

OO 

OO 

Of 

oo 

o 

£»«» 

00 

CO 

Of 

00 

CO 

CO 

*o 

i>« 

t"-* 

ass 
222 

XXX 


to          Of 

Of  00 


OO 
Of 


So 


OO         CO 


I 


2      2 
X     X 


00 

cq 
06 


X     X     X     X     X 


19 

Of 


w 


t         Q 

So  Jl 


U 


on 


CH    r-H  c/5    —J 

OJ      Cj  0>    S 

^0  §"0, 

>*fH  CO       U 

c_  fl  j       M 


<n     *i-i 
•        T3 


M        H     "O 

rj     bb   c 

P""l  /^         »»H 


<u 


r2    ^- 

^    ho  *3   Irt 

*  ff.tJ  s 
ll|§ 

s^lK 

3  US 

h? 

U      >      QJ 


•§  I 

Tl  ^3 

?  - 

M  ^ 

S  |. 

nJ  LL 


S       d 
I'S-S 

331 

«^     w 


« 

p 


Th       oo         *"j 
of         >fi       oo 


Ol 
OO 


IT)  T^H  O 

S      ?2     S 


O  3LO 

TH  OO 

co  q^ 

oo  oo 


o  o 

*O          vO 

OO  CO 


0 
iT5 
Of 


o 
*o 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM 


343 


examine  with  some  care  the  mechanism  that  Campbell  pro- 
poses as  an  explanation  of  displacements. 


2.  Calculating  the  Centrifugal  Effect 

I  have  already  mentioned  how  preliminary  calculations  were 
made  of  the  possible  centrifugal  effect  of  the  Antarctic  cap. 
I  have  mentioned  that  the  calculation  was  first  made  by 
Buker,  and  later  somewhat  revised  by  Campbell.  However, 
Campbell  recognized,  early  in  his  examination  of  the  theory, 
that  this  effect,  since  it  operated  at  right  angles  to  the  axis 
of  rotation  and  was  not  tangential  to  the  surface,  would  not 
produce  a  horizontal  movement  of  the  crust,  even  if  the 
magnitude  of  the  effect  was  sufficient  for  the  purpose.  It 
would  be  necessary,  he  felt,  to  find  the  tangential  component 
of  the  total  quantity  of  the  centrifugal  effect.  He  ac- 
complished this  by  the  application  of  the  principle  of  the 
parallelogram  of  forces  (Figure  XII).  However,  his  use  of  the 


METRIC  TOWS 


Fig.  XII.     The  Centrifugal  Effect  of  the  Icecap.  Use  of  the  Parallelo- 
gram of  Forces  to  Calculate  the  Tangential  Component 


344  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

principle  is  not  that  usually  presented  in  high  school  and 
college  textbooks  of  physics.  The  definition  of  the  law  of  the 
parallelogram  of  forces  is  as  follows: 

If  two  forces  acting  on  a  point  be  represented  in  direction  and 
intensity  by  the  adjacent  sides  of  a  parallelogram,  their  resultant  will 
be  represented  by  that  diagonal  of  the  parallelogram  which  passes 
through  the  point  (249:489). 

In  the  three  parallelograms  in  Figure  XII,  the  two  forces 
acting  on  the  point  a  are  the  force  of  gravity,  represented  by 
the  line  a-d  (a  radial  line  to  the  center  of  the  earth),  and  the 
tangential  component  of  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap, 
represented  by  the  line  a-c,  while  the  "resultant"  of  these 
forces  is  the  diagonal  a-b,  at  right  angles  to  the  axis  of  rota- 
tion. The  reader  will  note  that  Campbell  has  here  inverted 
the  terms  of  the  definition  but  without  changing  the  quanti- 
ties of  the  forces  in  relationship  to  each  other.  The  "re- 
sultant* '  in  the  definition  is  our  starting  point;  it  is  the 
estimated  total  centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap.  But  it  is  evi- 
dent that  it  is  unimportant  whether  the  given  quantity  is  the 
diagonal  or  the  side  of  the  parallelogram;  the  parallelogram 
permits  the  finding  of  the  unknown  quantity  from  the  known 
quantity,  whichever  the  latter  is.  The  parallelogram  there- 
fore permits  a  finding  of  the  quantity  of  the  tangential  com- 
ponent. The  rotating  effect  of  this  force  exerted  on  the 
earth's  crust  is  illustrated  by  the  weight  shown  in  Figure  XIV. 

By  definition,  the  tangential  component  of  the  centrifugal 
effect  is  exerted  horizontally  on  the  earth's  crust.  Now  the 
question  arises  as  to  whether  this  force  will  be  exerted  on 
the  crust  itself,  or  whether  it  will  act  on  the  earth's  body  as 
a  whole,  and  thus  tend  to  be  dissipated  in  depth.  This  is  the 
same  as  the  question  whether  the  icecap  will  tend  to  shift  the 
whole  planet  on  its  axis  or  merely  to  shift  the  crust.  We  have 
already  decided  that  it  will  tend  to  shift  the  crust  only,  be- 
cause of  the  existence  of  a  soft,  viscous,  and  plastic  layer 
under  the  crust.  We  may  therefore  conceive  of  this  force, 
the  tangential  component  of  the  total  effect,  as  acting  on  the 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  345 

crust  alone,  while  recognizing  that  the  displacement  of  the 
crust  involves  frictional  effects  with  the  sublayer.  We  have 
seen  that  a  special  characteristic  of  the  mechanism  under 
discussion  is  that  it  provides  a  constantly  growing  force  that 
will  overcome  this  friction,  rather  than  be  absorbed  by  it. 


3.  The  Wedge  Effect 

The  problem  to  be  solved  by  the  calculation  was  to  find  the 
quantity  of  the  centrifugal  thrust  of  the  icecap  in  terms  of 
pressure  per  square  inch  on  the  earth's  crust,  so  that  this 
quantity  could  be  compared  with  the  estimated  tensile 
strength  of  the  crust.  If  these  quantities  should  be  found  to 
be  of  about  the  same  magnitude,  it  would  follow  that  the 
icecap  had  the  potentiality  of  bringing  about  the  fracturing 
of  the  crust,  which,  because  of  the  slightly  oblate  shape  of  the 
earth,  was  necessary  to  its  displacement  over  the  lower  layers. 
Einstein,  in  a  letter  received  during  an  early  stage  of  the  in- 
vestigation, suggested  that  this  necessity  for  the  fracturing 
of  the  crust  was  the  only  serious  hindrance  to  crust  displace- 
ments in  response  to  centrifugal  effects.  He  wrote: 

For  your  theory  it  is  only  essential  that  an  excentrically  situated 
mass  rising  above  the  mean  level  of  the  earth-surface  is  producing  a 
centrifugal  momentum  acting  on  the  rigid  crust  of  the  earth.  The 
earth-crust  would  change  its  position  through  even  a  very  small  cen- 
trifugal force  if  the  crust  would  be  of  spheric  symmetry.  The  only 
force  that  I  can  see  which  can  prevent  such  sliding  motion  of  the 
crust  is  the  ellipsoidic  form  of  the  crust  (and  of  the  fluid  core).  This 
form  gives  to  the  crust  a  certain  amount  of  stability  which  allows  the 
dislocation  of  the  crust  only  if  the  centrifugal  momentum  has  a  cer- 
tain magnitude.  The  dislocation  may  then  occur  and  be  accompanied 
by  a  break  of  the  crust.  .  .  .  (128). 

Campbell,  visualizing  the  sliding  of  the  crust,  perceived  that 
a  bursting  stress  would  be  caused  in  the  crust  when  parts  of 
it  were  displaced  toward  or  across  the  equatorial  region, 
where  the  diameter  of  the  earth  is  greater.  It  became  possible 
to  visualize  it  in  the  manner  suggested  by  Campbell  in  the 


346 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 


lower  left-hand  drawing  of  Figure  XIV.  The  drawing  shows, 
in  black,  two  wedge-shaped  cross  sections  representing  the 
earth's  equatorial  bulge,  or  that  part  of  it  underlying  the 
areas  of  the  crust  moving  equatorward  in  the  displacement. 
Half  of  the  bulge  is,  in  fact,  involved;  the  other  half  under- 
lies the  areas  of  the  crust  being  simultaneously  displaced 
poleward,  but  these  do  not  affect  the  point  at  issue. 

The  reader  will  note  that  the  equatorial  bulge  of  the  earth 
is  represented  in  this  drawing  as  lying  underneath  the  crust, 
so  that  the  crust  is  not  a  part  of  it.  This  is  a  new  way  of  visu- 
alizing the  bulge,  introduced  by  Campbell,  and  justified  by 
him  on  the  ground  that  since  the  earth's  crust  is  of  the  same 
general  thickness  all  over  the  earth  regardless  of  latitude 
(even  though  it  may  be  of  differing  thicknesses  from  place  to 


POLAR   AX  1 5 


Fig.  XIII.    A  Cross  Section  of  the  Earth  Showing  the  Relation  Between 
the  Crust  and  the  Equatorial  Bulge 


CAMPBELL     S    MECHANISM 


347 


NORTH    POLE 

CROSS  SECTION  OF  EARTH  ON 
96*  EAST 


Fig.  XIV.    Various  Aspects  of  the  Wedge  Effect 

The  Antarctic  continent  is  shown,  with  center  of  gravity  displaced  to 
the  right,  on  a  line  representing  the  $6th  degree  of  East  Longitude.  The 
figure  at  the  right  represents  the  continuation  of  the  movement  of  the 
icecap  along  this  meridian,  mounting  the  bulge,  which  must  be  visualized 
three-dimensionally.  The  lower  left-hand  figure  shows  the  vertical  cross 
section  of  the  earth  under  the  icecap,  with  the  two  wedges  pushing  the 
crust  out  as  it  approaches  the  equator.  The  proportions  of  the  wedges 
ate  shown,  and  an  equilibrium  of  equal  and  opposite  pressures  is  indi- 
cated. The  tangential  pull  of  the  icecap  is  indicated  by  the  suspended 
weight. 


place,  and  under  mountains,  continents,  and  ocean  basins), 
then  the  differences  in  the  polar  and  equatorial  diameters  of 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 


CONVENTIONAL 

TYPE  OF  WEDGE: 


P«   PRESSURE   OF  ICECAP  «    7.5  »  I o'*  SHORT  TON8 

b  -  DEPTH  OF   WEDGE  «       6.0          MILK* 

Q «  pwesauRt  AGAINST  ' 

LITHOSPHCRE 


•  A.73»IO     4MORT  TONS 


CROSS  SECTION  OF  EARTH  AT 
96™ 


Fig.  XV.    The  Wedge  Effect 


the  earth  are  accounted  for  by  differences  in  the  thicknesses 
of  the  layers  underlying  the  crust,  and  the  bulge  itself  repre- 
sents added  matter  in  the  subcrustal  layers  in  the  equatorial 
regions. 

The  bulge,  viewed  in  this  way  as  lying  beneath  the  crust 
appeared  to  form  two  wedges  against  which  the  crust  had 
to  be  displaced  by  the  centrifugal  thrust  of  the  icecap.  Camp 
bell  reached  the  conclusion  that  to  estimate  the  bursting 
stress  produced  on  the  crust  in  the  equatorial  region,  il 
would  be  necessary  to  apply  the  mechanical  principle  of  the 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  349 

wedge,  which  has  the  effect  of  multiplying  the  effect  of  an 
applied  force.  This  principle  is  usually  given  as  follows: 

The  wedge  is  a  pair  of  inclined  planes  united  by  their  bases.  In  the 
application  of  pressure  to  the  head  or  butt  end  of  the  wedge,  to 
cause  it  to  penetrate  a  resisting  body,  the  applied  force  is  to  the 
resistance  as  the  thickness  of  the  wedge  is  to  its  length  (249:512). 

This  statement  means  that  a  wedge  multiplies  the  splitting 
power  (or  bursting  stress)  produced  by  an  applied  force  in 
the  proportion  of  the  length  of  the  wedge  to  its  thickness  at 
the  butt  end.  Figure  XV  shows  the  application  of  this  prin- 
ciple to  the  earth.  The  formula  for  calculating  the  wedge 
effect  is  presented  at  the  extreme  left,  where  P  =  pressure  (as 
thrust  of  the  icecap  transmitted  to  the  crust),  Q  =  the  mutual 
pressure  between  crust  and  bulge,  or  bursting  stress,  h  =  the 
height  (that  is,  the  length)  of  the  wedge,  and  b  =  the  base  or 
butt  end.  The  bursting  stress  equals  the  pressure  applied  to 
the  butt  and  multiplied  by  the  ratio  of  the  thickness  of  the 
butt  end  to  the  length  of  the  wedge.  The  length  of  the  wedge, 
in  this  case,  is  about  6,000  miles,  and  its  thickness  at  the  butt 
end  is  6.67  miles,  so  that  the  ratio  is  about  1,000:1,  and  the 
quantity  of  the  thrust  of  the  icecap  should  consequently  be 
multiplied  by  1,000;  however,  there  are  two  wedges,  one  on 
each  side  of  the  earth,  and  therefore  the  thrust  is  multiplied 
only  500  times.  Nevertheless,  the  significance  of  such  a  multi- 
plication of  the  effect  of  the  icecap  is  self-evident. 

It  was  not  a  simple  matter  to  apply  the  principle  of  the 
wedge  to  the  earth.  As  in  the  case  of  the  principle  of  the 
parallelogram,  the  formula  could  not  simply  be  copied  from 
a  textbook;  it  had  to  be  imaginatively  applied.  For  example, 
in  the  diagram  P,  or  pressure,  is  shown  exerted  on  the  butt 
end,  like  a  sledge  hammer  hitting  the  butt  end  of  a  wedge  to 
split  a  log.  But  obviously,  the  thrust  of  the  icecap  is  not,  in 
the  first  instance,  applied  in  this  way.  It  takes  an  act  of  the 
imagination  to  realize  that  in  effect  it  amounts  to  the  same 
thing.  The  icecap  is  really  pushing  or  pulling  the  crust 
toward  the  equator  on  both  sides  of  the  earth,  but  the  matter 


350  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

may  just  as  well  be  looked  at  in  the  opposite  way,  as  if  the 
icecap  and  crust  stood  still,  or  were  under  no  horizontal 
pressure,  but  force  was  being  applied  to  the  butt  end  of  the 
wedge.  Either  way,  the  mathematics  is  the  same.  Campbell's 
application  of  this  principle  to  the  problem  of  estimating  the 
bursting  stress  on  the  crust  was  discussed  with  physicists,  in- 
cluding Frankland,  Bridgman,  and  Einstein  (see  below),  none 
of  whom  questioned  its  soundness. 

After  finding  the  quantity  of  the  total  stress  on  the  earth's 
crust  produced  by  the  centrifugal  effect  transmitted  from 
the  icecap,  Campbell  reduced  it  to  pressure  per  square  inch 
by  dividing  it  into  the  number  of  square  inches  in  a  cross 
section  of  the  earth's  crust,  assuming  an  average  thickness  of 
the  crust  of  about  40  miles.  This  estimate  of  the  crust's  thick- 
ness is  a  liberal  one,  since  some  writers,  including  Umbgrove, 
suggest  that  it  may  be  no  more  than  half  as  much.  Since  a 
lesser  thickness  for  the  crust  would  mean  a  higher  figure  for 
the  bursting  stress  per  square  inch,  an  error  in  this  direction 
here  may  serve  to  counter  the  effect  of  the  possible  partial 
isostatic  compensation  of  the  icecap,  which  we  have  disre- 
garded in  the  tentative  calculation  of  its  centrifugal  effect. 
Thus,  if  half  the  icecap  is  isostatically  compensated,  but  the 
crust  is  only  20  miles  thick,  then  Campbell's  estimate  of  the 
pressure  per  square  inch  will  be  unchanged. 

Campbell  found  that  the  bursting  stress  on  the  crust  per 
square  inch  amounted  to  about  1,700  pounds  (see  p.  361).  In 
comparison  with  this,  I  found  that  the  crushing  point  of 
basalt  at  the  earth's  surface  has  been  estimated,  from  labora- 
tory experiments,  at  2,500  pounds.  A  number  of  points  must 
be  considered  in  reaching  conclusions  regarding  the  possible 
significance  of  these  comparative  figures.  First,  the  crushing 
strength  of  any  rock  is  considered  to  be  higher  than  its 
tensile,  or  breaking  strength.  Thus,  the  tensile  strength  of 
basalt,  the  principal  constituent  of  the  earth's  crust,  is  proba- 
bly considerably  closer  to  the  estimated  quantity  of  the 
bursting  stress.  A  second  important  consideration  is  that 
the  earth's  crust  is  unequal  in  thickness  and  strength  from 


CAMPBELLS     MECHANISM  351 

place  to  place,  and  is  everywhere  penetrated  by  deep  frac- 
tures. It  would  naturally  fail  at  its  weakest  point.  As  we  shall 
see  below,  Einstein,  in  view  of  these  facts,  said  that  he  would 
be  satisfied  as  to  the  plausibility  of  the  mechanics  of  this 
theory  if  the  ratio  of  the  bursting  stress  to  the  strength  of  the 
crust  was  1:100.  The  ratio  as  shown  by  Campbell  is  very 
much  closer  than  the  ratio  demanded  by  Einstein.  It  seems 
therefore  reasonable  to  suppose  that  at  some  point  of  the 
future  growth  of  the  icecap,  which  is  now,  it  appears,  still 
growing,  the  crust  may  respond  to  the  increasing  bursting 
stress  by  fracturing.  When  this  occurs,  it  may  be  expected 
that  a  process  will  begin  of  gradual  fracturing  and  folding  of 
the  crust,  accompanied  by  the  beginning  of  its  displacement 
over  the  underlying  layers. 

Campbell  has  pointed  out  that  no  very  great  force  is  re- 
quired to  accomplish  a  widespread  fracturing  of  the  crust 
during  a  displacement.  At  the  first  local  failure  of  the  crust 
in  response  to  the  bursting  stress,  the  stress  will  be  relieved 
at  that  point,  to  become  effective  immediately  at  an  adjacent 
point.  Thus  the  fracture  will  travel  through  the  crust  with- 
out the  application  of  additional  force.  From  this  it  is  clear 
that  the  steady  application  of  a  small  force  would  suffice  to 
fracture  the  crust  to  a  great  distance.  In  his  conversation  with 
Einstein,  an  account  of  which  is  given  below,  Campbell  gave 
a  convincing  illustration  of  this  principle. 

The  ability  of  the  crust  to  resist  fracture  is  slight.  Jeffreys 
found  that  a  strain  equal  to  the  weight  of  a  layer  of  rock  2,200 
feet  in  height  would  fracture  it  to  its  full  depth  (238:202). 
It  is  clear  that  the  tensile  strength  of  the  crust  does  not  com- 
pare with  its  crushing  strength,  which,  also  according  to 
Jeffreys,  is  sufficient  to  enable  it  to  transmit  mountain-mak- 
ing stresses  to  any  distance.  Campbell  visualizes  the  proc- 
ess of  crust  displacement  not  as  a  continuous  movement  but 
as  a  staged  movement  resulting  from  an  interaction  alter- 
nately of  the  direct  thrust  of  the  icecap  and  of  the  bursting 
stress.  He  writes: 


352  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

.  .  .  There  are  two  distinctly  separate  functions  performed  by  the 
mass  of  the  icecap.  .  .  .  The  first  is  the  centrifugal  momentum  caus- 
ing the  lithosphere  to  change  its  position  in  relation  to  the  poles.  .  .  . 
When  the  lithosphere  comes  to  a  standstill  for  want  of  a  sufficient 
force,  the  second  function  of  the  icecap  gets  busy  and  builds  up  a 
pressure  of  tremendous  potential,  five  hundred  times  the  force  pro- 
duced by  the  icecap,  and  will  continue  to  add  to  this  pressure  at  the 
rate  of  five  hundred  times  the  increasing  pressure  of  the  growing 
icecap,  until  it  finally  splits  the  lithosphere.  Then  the  pressure  will 
drop,  and  the  first  function  will  take  hold,  and  once  again  start  to 
move  the  lithosphere.  This  alternate  action  will  continue  to  take 
place  until  the  icecap  is  destroyed.  .  .  . 

.  .  .  The  wedge  does,  not  multiply  the  power  of  the  centrifugal 
momentum,  as  such.  The  power  disposed  for  the  movement  of  the 
lithosphere  remains  the  same  as  it  always  has  been,  but  the  static 
pressure  that  will  fracture  the  lithosphere,  thereby  permitting  the 
centrifugal  momentum  of  the  icecap  to  start  moving  the  lithosphere, 
will  be  multiplied  by  500. 

The  wedge  has  been  functioning  ever  since  the  first  permanent 
snow  fell  on  the  Antarctic  continent;  it  is  functioning  today.  ...  At 
the  same  time,  die  centrifugal  momentum  of  the  icecap  is  just  stand- 
ing by,  waiting  for  the  lithosphere  to  fracture  and  be  released  for  the 
journey  toward  the  equator.  The  tensile  strain  will  fade  away  with 
the  faulting  of  the  lithosphere,  but  should  the  fractures  freeze  up 
again  from  any  cause,  the  tensile  strain  will  tend  to  build  up  again, 
and  the  same  series  of  actions  will  repeat  themselves  (66). 

We  saw  that  the  process  that  destroyed  the  Wisconsin  ice* 
cap  was  several  times  interrupted  and  renewed  in  alternating 
withdrawals  and  readvances  of  the  ice,  which  we  have  ex- 
plained as  resulting  from  episodes  of  massive  volcanism. 
These  phases  appear  to  correspond  to  the  alternating  phases 
of  the  process  of  displacement  as  suggested  by  Campbell, 
which  would  naturally  have  been  accompanied  by  volcanic 
activity. 


4.  Some  Difficulties 

A  number  of  objections  have  been  raised,  in  the  course  of 
consultations  with  specialists,  to  the  mechanism  of  displace- 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  353 

ment  suggested  by  Campbell.  We  have  considered  these  ob- 
jections, and  they  do  not  appear  formidable.  I  am  summariz- 
ing some  of  these  in  the  following  pages,  in  order  that  the 
reader  may  know,  if  any  of  these  have  occurred  to  him,  that 
they  have  already  been  given  consideration. 

a.  The  question  of  friction  with  the  subcrustal  layer.  It 
may  at  first  appear  that  friction  would  be  a  powerful  brake 
on  any  extensive  displacement  of  the  crust,  and  unquestion- 
ably it  would  have  an  effect.  Yet  there  are  several  mechanical 
factors  that  could  aid  a  displacement.  A  leading  considera- 
tion is  that  the  suggested  movement  is  a  gliding  motion. 
Gliding  is  the  most  economical  form  of  motion.  It  has  been 
said,  in  fact,  that  gliding  constitutes  an  ideal  form  of  motion 
that  utilizes  100  per  cent  of  energy,  as  opposed  to  the  sphere 
and  the  cylinder,  which,  being  round,  lose  30  per  cent  of 
their  energy  in  rotation,  which  reduces  their  speed  consider- 
ably. Frankland  has  suggested  that  a  rise  of  temperature  at 
the  interface  of  the  crust  and  the  lower  layer,  as  the  result 
of  friction,  could  facilitate  a  displacement.  Campbell  con- 
siders that  the  underlayer,  or  asthenosphere,  would  act  more 
like  a  lubricant  than  a  retardant.  He  compares  the  movement 
to  the  motion  of  ice  floes:  ".  .  .  Observe  how  vast  fields  of 
ice  are  started  in  motion  just  by  the  friction  of  the  wind  on 
the  surface  of  the  ice.  .  .  .  Again,  you  will  see  the  same 
thing  by  visiting  a  pond  where  they  are  cutting  ice.  You  will 
see  men  pushing  around  blocks  of  ice  of  three  or  four  hun- 
dred square  feet  with  the  greatest  ease  as  long  as  the  ice  is 
floating  in  the  water.  .  .  ." 

b.  The  question  of  the  extent  of  the  displacement.  It  has 
been  questioned  whether  a  displacement  of  the  crust  might 
not  terminate  at  an  early  stage  because  of  the  melting  of 
the  icecap  as  it  moves  into  lower  latitudes.  Campbell,  how- 
ever, has  pointed  out  that  as  the  icecap  moves  equatorward 
from  a  polar  region,  the  ice  will  continue  to  accumulate  on 
the  rear  or  poleward  side,  and  that  this  will  have  the  effect 
of  prolonging  the  motion  of  the  crust.  In  some  circumstances, 
if  the  icecap  happened  to  be  situated  on  a  very  large  land 


354  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

mass,  this  might  mean  a  long  continuation  of  the  movement. 
An  icecap  in  Eurasia  might  move  the  crust  a  great  distance. 
It  is  obvious  that  a  natural  point  for  the  termination  of  the 
movement  will  be  the  arrival  of  an  oceanic  area  at  the  pole, 
so  that  the  rearward  build-up  of  the  ice  is  brought  to  an  end. 
This  would  appear  to  have  happened  in  the  last  movement, 
when  the  southward  shift  of  North  America  seems  to  have 
brought  the  Arctic  Ocean  into  the  polar  zone. 

c.  The  question  of  the  possible  suspension  of  movements 
if  both  poles  should  happen  to  be  situated  in  oceans.  This  is 
one  of  the  more  important  objections  that  have  been  raised 
to  Campbell's  mechanism  of  displacement.  Yet,  it  appears 
that  it  is  much  less  formidable  a  difficulty  than  it  seemed  at 
first  glance.  It  might  be  supposed  that  the  eventuality  of 
having  both  poles  in  water  areas  would  be  certain  to  occur; 
that  is,  it  would  have  occurred  early  in  the  earth's  history, 
and  would  have  stopped  crust  displacements  by  putting  an 
end  to  the  formation  of  great  polar  icecaps.  However,  a 
further  examination  of  this  objection  reveals  weaknesses  in  it. 

In  the  first  place,  the  very  peculiar  placing  of  the  conti- 
nents with  respect  to  the  ocean  basins  renders  such  an  event 
almost  impossible.  All  the  six  continents  are  placed  dia- 
metrically opposite  oceans  on  the  other  side  of  the  globe. 
Ninety-five  per  cent  of  all  the  land  on  the  globe  lies  opposite 
water.  Moreover,  the  oceans  are  surrounded  by  continental 
shelves  that  extend  for  considerable  distances,  and  there  are 
island  areas  in  the  oceans  where  the  water  is  comparatively 
shallow.  We  have  seen  that,  according  to  Gutenberg,  any 
part  of  the  earth's  surface  moved  poleward  by  a  crust  dis- 
placement would  stand  higher  relatively  to  sea  level.  Any 
area  now  near  the  equator  would  be  raised  considerably  if 
moved  to  a  pole,  by  reason  of  the  variation  of  gravity  alone, 
while  other  factors  might  add  to  the  vertical  movement 
(Chapters  IV,  V,  VI).  Displacements  could  result  in  raising 
the  continental  shelves,  shallow  seas,  and  island  areas  above 
sea  level.  The  two  or  three  displacements  of  the  crust  in  the 
same  direction  that  would  be  required  to  move  any  area  from 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  355 

near  the  equator  to  the  vicinity  of  a  pole  might  produce 
major  increases  in  elevation.  Finally,  it  would  be  necessary  for 
both  poles  to  be  so  far  away  from  the  nearest  land  as  to  pre- 
vent the  growth  of  icecaps  on  any  side,  for  an  icecap  formed 
all  on  one  side  of  a  pole  and  at  a  considerable  distance  from 
it  would  have  a  very  great  centrifugal  effect  proportionately 
to  its  size.  Campbell  carried  out  a  series  of  careful  measure- 
ments of  the  globe  to  find  out  how  many  possibilities  actually 
exist  at  the  present  time  for  the  location  of  both  poles  in 
water.  He  found  that  there  is  only  one  such  position,  where 
one  pole  would  be  in  the  South  Atlantic  and  the  other  in  the 
North  Pacific  between  the  Marshalls  and  the  Carolines.  But 
the  latter  area,  in  the  course  of  its  displacement  from  its  pres- 
ent latitude  to  the  vicinity  of  a  pole,  could  easily  be  raised 
above  sea  level. 

It  cannot  be  denied,  despite  this,  that  there  exists  a  real 
possibility  that  at  various  times  during  the  history  of  the 
globe  both  poles  have  been,  in  fact,  situated  in  oceanic  areas. 
Unquestionably,  this  would  have  resulted  in  the  temporary 
cessation  of  the  formation  of  great  polar  icecaps,  and  there- 
fore of  displacements  of  the  crust.  However,  there  is  no  rea- 
son to  conclude  that  this  would  have  meant  a  permanent 
cessation  of  crust  displacements.  We  must  not  forget  that 
Gold  has  suggested  a  mechanism  by  which  a  shift  of  90  de- 
grees in  the  positions  of  the  poles  could  occur  in  periods  of  a 
million  years.  In  this  way  a  period  without  crust  displace- 
ment could  be  ended  by  the  gradual  movement  of  a  new  land 
area  to  a  pole.  It  is  even  quite  possible  that  the  accumulation 
of  inequalities  of  mass  within  the  crust  itself,  as  the  result  of 
erosion  or  of  igneous  processes,  might  eventually  produce  a 
displacement  without  the  agency  of  an  icecap. 

d.  The  question  as  to  why  the  postulated  centrifugal  effect 
has  not  prevented  the  accumulation  of  the  icecap.  One  com- 
mentator has  pointed  to  the  well-known  fact  that  ice  flows 
outward  in  all  directions  from  a  central  point  or  points, 
through  the  effects  of  its  own  weight,  and  has  argued  that  the 
centrifugal  effect  should  operate  to  make  the  icecap  flow  off 


356  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

into  the  sea  rather  than  to  bring  about  a  transfer  of  centrif- 
ugal momentum  from  the  icecap  to  the  crust.  This  objection 
has  a  certain  plausibility  at  first  glance,  and  yet  it  is  invalid 
for  the  following  reason.  We  know  that  according  to  classical 
mechanics  any  mass  deposited  upon  the  earth's  surface  (pro- 
vided that  surface  is  already  in  gravitational  equilibrium)  will 
be  acted  upon  by  the  earth's  rotation,  and  will  give  rise  to  a 
centrifugal  effect.  So  much  cannot  be  denied.  It  is  also  true 
that  the  resulting  centrifugal  momentum  will  act  upon  the 
ice  and  can  be  expected  to  accelerate  to  some  degree  the 
rate  of  flow  of  the  ice  in  the  direction  of  the  thrust  (not  in 
all  directions).  In  the  case  of  the  present  Antarctic  icecap 
this  might  mean  a  slightly  increased  rate  of  flow  across  the 
broadest  section  of  the  continent,  in  the  direction  of  the 
meridian  of  96°  E.  Long,  (see  the  map  of  Antarctica,  Intro- 
duction, p.  18).  However,  the  crux  of  the  matter  is,  obviously, 
the  ratio  of  the  rate  of  flow  to  the  rate  of  accumulation  of  the 
ice.  It  is  clear,  on  the  one  hand,  that  new  ice,  until  brought 
within  the  equilibrium  surface  of  the  globe  by  isostatic  ad- 
justment, must  give  rise  to  centrifugal  effects;  and  on  the 
other  hand  it  is  quite  clear  that,  despite  this,  the  icecap  has 
continued  to  accumulate.  Why  does  it  happen  that  the  cen- 
trifugal effect  does  not  produce  a  flow-off  of  ice  from  the 
continent  at  a  rate  equal  to  the  rate  of  accumulation?  The 
answer  to  this  is,  obviously,  that  ice  presents  considerable 
resistance  to  flow.  It  flows  only  under  considerable  pressure, 
and  is  otherwise  a  solid.  Moreover,  in  Antarctica,  and  pre- 
sumably in  any  polar  icecap,  the  prevailing  low  temperatures 
cause  the  ice  to  have  increased  rigidity.  It  is  also  thought  that 
the  ice  below  the  superficial  layers  of  a  great  ice  sheet  is  stag- 
nant, and  that  only  the  upper  layers  move.  This  means  that 
the  ice  that  is  in  contact  with  the  ground  is  fixed  to  the 
earth's  surface.  The  viscosity,  or  stiffness,  of  the  ice  in  turn 
means  that  a  drag  is  imparted  by  the  upper  layers  to  the 
lower  layers,  and  by  them  to  the  underlying  crust.  Thus  the 
centrifugal  momentum  is  transmitted  to  the  crust.  Finally, 
the  supposition  of  the  gliding  off  of  the  icecap  is  rendered 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  357 

more  improbable  by  the  uneven  topography  of  the  continent 
and  especially  by  the  great  fringing  mountain  ranges.  We 
have  cited  Einstein's  opinion  that  the  flow-off  of  ice  from 
Antarctica  in  the  form  of  icebergs  is  an  insignificant  percent- 
age of  the  annual  ice  accumulation. 

e.  The  question  as  to  whether  the  centrifugal  effect  postu- 
lated in  this  theory  exists  at  all.  Some  commentators  have 
rejected  the  idea  that  a  large  total  centrifugal  effect  may  be 
created  by  the  asymmetric  accumulation  of  an  icecap.  They 
have  agreed  only  to  the  existence  of  a  centrifugal  effect  that 
may  be  created  if  the  center  of  mass  of  an  object  is  elevated 
above  the  equilibrium  surface  of  the  earth.  This  has  been 
termed  the  Eotvos  effect.  It  does  not  depend  upon  the  exist- 
ence of  excess  mass  at  a  point.  It  may  be  illustrated  by  an 
iceberg  floating  in  water.  The  ice  is  in  gravitational  balance, 
having  displaced  its  weight  of  water.  But  one  tenth  of  its 
weight  is  above  the  surface  of  the  water.  The  center  of  its 
mass  is  therefore  higher  than  the  center  of  the  displaced 
water.  If  the  center  of  its  mass  is  further  from  the  earth's 
center,  it  is  now  moving  around  the  earth's  center  at  a  faster 
rate.  It  has  been  accelerated,  and  the  tangential  component 
of  the  acceleration  will  tend  to  move  it  toward  the  equator. 

This  concept  is  well  known  in  geophysics,  and  conse- 
quently it  has  been  the  customary  mode  of  considering  any 
question  involving  centrifugal  effects  on  the  earth's  surface. 
But  the  effects  that  may  arise  from  an  accumulation  of  ice 
that  has  not  been  brought  within  the  equilibrium  surface  of 
the  earth  by  isostatic  adjustment,  and  which  therefore  con- 
stitutes an  accumulation  of  excess  mass  at  a  point  on  the 
surface,  have  not  received  equal  attention.  I  have  already 
mentioned  the  fact  that  the  idea  came  to  both  Bridgman  and 
Daly  as  a  new  idea,  and  one  that  seemed  to  them  worth  in- 
vestigating. Because  of  the  special  importance  of  this  issue, 
I  am  presenting  a  more  detailed  discussion  of  it  below. 

f.  The  question  as  to  whether  the  crust  is  strong  enough 
to  transmit  the  centrifugal  momentum  of  the  icecap.  A  num- 


358  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

ber  of  consultants  have  been  in  doubt  on  this  point  because 
of  their  knowledge  that  the  crust  is,  from  certain  points  of 
view,  very  weak.  It  has  little  tensile  strength,  and  as  a  conse- 
quence cannot  bear  heavy  loads  without  fracturing  or  giving 
way  by  plastic  flow.  However,  tensile  strength  and  crushing 
strength  are  two  very  different  things.  A  bar  made  of  a  brittle 
but  hard  substance  will  have  little  tensile  strength,  but  con- 
siderable force  may  be  required  to  crush  it.  The  rocks  com- 
posing the  earth's  crust  are  highly  rigid,  and  therefore,  de- 
spite the  fact  that  they  have  little  tensile  strength,  such  as 
would  be  required  to  contain  vertical  stresses,  they  have 
enormous  strength  to  resist  horizontally  applied  compressive 
stresses.  They  simply  cannot  be  compressed  to  any  extent, 
and  only  an  enormous  force  will  produce  plastic  flow.  The 
rocks  of  the  crust  are  so  rigid  (despite  the  fact  that  they  do, 
of  course,  possess  a  certain  small  degree  of  elasticity)  that  the 
penetration  of  the  crust  by  fractures  does  not  seriously  mod- 
ify its  power  to  transmit  horizontal  or  tangential  stresses. 
There  is  geological  evidence  in  the  mountain  systems,  in  the 
planetary  fracture  systems,  in  the  great  globe-encircling  can- 
yon system  recently  discovered  by  Ewing,  that  stresses  have 
been  applied  to  the  earth's  crust  as  a  whole,  and  various  geol- 
ogists, including  Hobbs  and  Umbgrove,  have  made  state- 
ments to  that  effect. 

A  proper  understanding  of  this  question  requires  that  the 
magnitude  of  the  stress  and  its  mode  of  application  should 
be  considered.  An  enormous  pressure  per  square  inch,  espe- 
cially if  applied  all  at  once,  might  cause  local  deformation  of 
the  crust  by  bringing  about  rock  flow,  as  it  has  been  sug- 
gested by  Bridgman  (p.  189),  but  the  stresses  that  we  suppose 
to  derive  from  the  icecap  are  not  of  this  order,  nor  do  they 
reach  their  maximum  intensity  until  after  a  period  of  gradual 
growth  during  which  they  could  be  transmitted  to  the  crust 
as  a  whole.  The  icecap  produces  a  gentle  pressure,  slowly 
growing  and  steadily  applied  over  a  considerable  length  of 
time,  incapable  of  radically  deforming  the  crust  adjacent  to 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  359 

itself,  but  capable  of  exerting  a  persistent  push  on  the  earth's 
crust. 

If  it  were  possible  to  exhaust  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the 
icecap  by  the  absorption  of  energy  in  a  local  deformation  of 
the  crust,  the  matter  might  wear  a  different  aspect.  But  we 
are  to  remember  that,  if  the  yielding  of  the  crust  or  its  dis- 
placement as  a  whole  allows  the  displacement  of  the  ice  mass 
farther  from  the  axis  of  rotation,  the  centrifugal  effect  is 
thereby  multiplied.  In  these  circumstances  the  centrifugal 
momentum  cannot  be  absorbed  locally,  but  must  be  trans- 
mitted to  the  entire  crustal  shell  of  the  earth. 

Jeffreys  has  remarked  that  the  earth's  crust  can  transmit 
mountain-building  stresses  to  any  distance  (238: 2 £ 


5.  The  Calculations 

The  following  are  the  calculations  of  the  centrifugal  effect 
of  the  present  Antarctic  icecap,  and  of  the  resulting  bursting 
stress  on  the  crust,  as  worked  out  by  Campbell.  The  phraseol- 
ogy is  in  part  that  of  Dr.  John  M.  Frankland,  of  the  Federal 
Bureau  of  Standards,  who  was  kind  enough  to  review  these 
calculations. 

a.  Calculation  of  the  Centrifugal  Effect  of  the  Rotation  of 
the  Antarctic  Icecap: 

Assume  isostatic  adjustment  o,  center  of  gravity  of  the  ice- 
cap 345  miles  from  the  polar  axis,  and  volume  of  the  ice 
equal  to  6,000,000  cubic  miles. 

W  =  Weight  of  the  icecap  =  2.500  X  1Ql6  short  tons. 

F   =  Centrifugal  effect  in  pounds  =  — — ,  where 

gR 

v    —  Velocity  of  revolving  icecap,  132  feet  per  second, 
R  =  Distance  from  the  axis  of  rotation  to  the  center  of 
gravity  of  the  icecap  =  345  miles  =  1,821,600  feet, 
g    =  Acceleration  due  to  gravity  =  32. 


360  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

F   _  Wv2  _  2.5  X  i°16  X 


gR  32  X  1,821,600 

43*870.75  X  iQ16  _ 

58,291,200 

7.5  X  l°12  short  tons  =  6.8  X   l°12  metric  tons, 
total  centrifugal  effect,  6.8   X    l°12  metric  tons, 
radial  force  tangential  to  the  earth's  surface, 
6.8  X  1C)2  metric  tons  (see  p.  343). 

This,  of  course,  is  an  upper  estimate,  which  may  be  too  large 
by  a  factor  of  two  or  three. 

b.  Calculation  of  the  Bursting  Stresses  on  the  Lithosphere: 

An  approximation  of  the  bursting  stress  caused  by  this  cen- 
trifugal effect  can  be  reached  by  simple  methods  as  follows. 
More  elaborate  approaches  hardly  seem  justified  in  view  of  the 
uncertainty  of  the  magnitude  of  the  centrifugal  force. 

It  is  assumed  that  the  entire  resistance  to  the  motion  of 
the  lithosphere  arises  from  the  fact  that  the  earth  is  not  a 
perfect  sphere,  but  is  an  oblate  spheroid.  The  tangential,  or 
shearing,  stresses  between  the  lithosphere  and  the  underlying 
asthenosphere  are  considered  negligible  because  of  the  time 
factor,  and  because  of  the  assumed  viscosity  of  the  astheno- 
sphere. If  one  considers  the  great  circle  passing  through  the 
center  of  gravity  of  the  icecap,  at  right  angles  to  the  meridian 
of  centrifugal  thrust  of  the  icecap,  it  is  evident  that  the  cir- 
cumference of  this  great  circle  will  be  increased  if  the  icecap 
is  displaced  away  from  the  pole.  Of  course,  any  stress  system 
that  arises  in  this  way  will  be  two-dimensional,  but  one  will 
hardly  be  in  error  by  a  factor  of  more  than  two,  if  one  neg- 
lects the  two-dimensional  character  of  the  stresses  and  as- 
sumes instead  that  they  are  uniaxial.  The  only  purpose  of 
this  computation  is,  of  course,  to  show  the  order  of  mag- 
nitude of  the  effect. 

With  this  kind  of  approximation,  one  may  view  the  equa- 
torial bulge  as  a  kind  of  wedge  up  which  the  lithosphere  is 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  361 

being  pushed.  There  are,  of  course,  two  wedges,  one  on  each 
side  of  the  globe. 

The  bursting  stress  is  the  product  of  the  tangential  effect 
of  the  icecap  by  the  ratio  of  the  gradient  of  the  bulge: 

(1)  Thickness  of  bulge  (wedge)  at  its  butt  end  nn  6.67  miles. 

(2)  Ratio  of  travel  to  lift,  of  bulge  wedge  =  6, 152:  6.67 

(3)  Stress,  on  cross  section  of  the  lithosphere  (taken  as 
40  miles  thick)  =  7.5  X  1Ql2  X  6,152 

6.67  X  2 
=  34588  X  1Ql5  short  tons. 

_  34588  X  io15  7 

~ 5 =  3-5  X  io7 

99°>894 

short  tons  per  sq.  mi. 
—  Approximately  1,700  Ibs.  per  sq.  in. 


6.  Notes  of  a  Conference  with  Einstein 

In  January,  1955,  Mr.  Campbell  and  I  had  the  privilege  of 
a  conference  with  Einstein  at  which  a  number  of  important 
questions  relating  to  the  theory  were  discussed.  Subsequently, 
I  prepared  the  following  statement,  which  I  submitted  to 
him  for  his  approval.  He  approved  it  as  an  accurate  report  of 
our  discussion,  but  he  desired  that  it  should  not  be  inter- 
preted as  an  official  endorsement  on  his  part  of  Mr.  Camp- 
bell's calculations  in  detail,  which  he  had  had  insufficient 
opportunity  to  study.  Those  present  at  the  meeting  included 
Dr.  Einstein,  Mr.  Campbell,  Mrs.  Mary  G.  Grand,  and  myself. 

After  the  introductory  remarks,  Mr.  Hapgood  explained 
to  Dr.  Einstein  that  while,  in  the  development  of  the  theory, 
he  had  himself  been  concerned  mainly  with  the  field  evi- 
dence in  geology  and  paleontology,  Mr.  Campbell  had  con- 
tributed the  basic  concepts  in  mechanics  and  geophysics. 

Mr.  Hapgood  explained  further  that  Mr.  Campbell's  cal- 
culations had  now  advanced  to  a  point  where  he  felt  that  a 
consultation  was  necessary.  The  principal  question  was 


362  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

whether  the  tangential  portion  of  the  centrifugal  effect  re- 
sulting from  the  rotation  of  the  icecap  was  of  the  correct 
order  of  magnitude  to  cause  fracturing  of  the  earth's  rigid 
crust.  Dr.  Einstein  had  stated  in  a  letter  to  Mr.  Hapgood 
that,  owing  to  the  oblate  shape  of  the  earth,  the  crust  could 
not  be  displaced  without  fracturing  and  that  the  tensile 
strength  of  the  crust,  opposing  such  fracturing,  was  the  only 
force  he  could  see  that  could  prevent  a  displacement  of  the 
crust.  He  had  already  suggested,  therefore,  that  it  would  be 
necessary  to  compare  the  bursting  stresses  proceeding  from 
the  icecap  with  the  available  data  on  the  strengths  of  the 
crustal  rocks. 

It  was  this  problem  that  now,  through  the  calculations 
made  by  Mr.  Campbell,  seemed  to  be  solved. 

Mr.  Campbell  explained  to  Dr.  Einstein  the  principles  he 
had  followed  in  making  the  calculations.  He  used  photostatic 
drawings  as  illustrations.  He  showed  that  the  crust,  in  at- 
tempting to  pass  over  the  equatorial  bulge  of  the  earth, 
would  be  stretched  to  a  slight  degree.  A  bursting  stress  would 
arise  that  would  tend  to  tear  the  crust  apart.  This  stress 
would  in  all  probability  exceed  the  elastic  limit  of  the  crustal 
rocks:  that  is,  they  would  tend  to  yield  by  fracture,  if  the 
stress  was  great  enough.  Dr.  Einstein  said,  Yes,  but  he  won- 
dered how  an  equilibrium  of  force  would  be  created?  Mr. 
Campbell  pointed  out  that  two  equal  and  opposite  pressures 
would  arise,  since,  at  the  same  time,  on  two  opposite  sides 
of  the  globe,  two  opposite  sectors  or  quadrants  of  the  crust 
would  be  attempting  to  cross  the  bulge. 

Dr.  Einstein  agreed  that  this  was  reasonable,  but  raised  the 
question  of  the  behavior  of  the  semiliquid  underlayer  of  the 
bulge,  under  pressure  from  the  rigid  crust.  After  some  dis- 
cussion it  was  agreed  that  this  underlayer,  despite  its  lack  of 
strength,  would  not  be  displaced,  because  of  the  effect  of  the 
centrifugal  momentum  of  the  earth. 

Mr.  Campbell  then  explained  the  application  of  a  prin- 
ciple by  which  the  tangential  stress  proceeding  from  the  ice- 
cap was  greatly  magnified.  He  considered  that  the  bulge  of 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  363 


the  earth,  starting  with  zero  thickness  at  the  poles,  and 
proaching  6.67  miles  in  thickness  at  the  equator,  behaved 
physically  as  a  wedge  resisting  the  movement  of  the  crust. 
Since  the  distance  from  pole  to  equator  is  about  6,000  miles, 
the  ratio  of  this  wedge  was  1,000:1;  but  the  existence  of  two 
wedges  on  opposite  sides  of  the  globe  reduced  the  ratio  to 
500:1.  The  icecap's  tangential  effect,  multiplied  by  500,  and 
divided  by  the  number  of  square  inches  of  the  cross  section 
of  the  lithospheric  shell  at  the  equator  (assuming  the  crust 
to  be  40  miles  thick),  produced  a  bursting  stress  on  that  shell 
of  1,738  pounds  per  square  inch.  After  examining  each  step 
in  the  argument  twice  Dr.  Einstein  had  the  impression  that 
the  principles  were  right,  and  that  the  effects  were  of  the 
right  order  of  magnitude.  He  stated  that  he  would  be  satis- 
fied if  the  bursting  stress  and  the  strength  of  the  crust  were 
in  the  ratio  of  not  more  than  1:100,  since  the  crust  varied 
so  greatly  in  strength  from  place  to  place,  and  would  un- 
doubtedly yield  at  its  weakest  point. 

Mr.  Campbell  explained  an  effect  he  had  often  observed, 
which  illustrated  the  process  by  which  the  crust  might  yield 
to  fracture.  A  common  method  of  splitting  a  block  of  granite 
is  to  drill  two  small  holes,  about  six  inches  apart,  near  the 
center  of  the  long  axis  of  the  granite,  and  insert  and  drive 
home  a  wedge  in  each  hole,  A  bursting  stress  of  sufficient 
magnitude  is  brought  to  bear  to  split  the  rock.  However,  the 
rock  is  not  split  all  at  once.  Enough  stress  is  brought  to  bear 
to  start  a  fracture,  but  the  fracture  does  not  take  place  in- 
stantaneously. If  the  wedges  are  put  in  place  in  the  evening, 
it  will  be  found  next  morning  that  the  whole  rock  has  been 
split  evenly  along  a  line  extending  through  the  two  holes. 
The  fracture  has  slowly  migrated  through  the  rock  during 
the  night.  The  force  required  to  split  rock  in  this  way  is  but 
a  fraction  of  that  required  to  split  it  all  at  once.  So  far  as  the 
earth's  crust  is  concerned,  what  is  required  is  not  a  force  suf- 
ficient to  split  it  all  at  once,  but  simply  a  force  sufficient  to 
initiate  a  fracture  or  fractures,  which  will  then  gradually 


364  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

extend  themselves  during  possibly  considerable  periods  of 
time. 

Mr.  Hapgood  next  described  the  geological  evidence  of 
world-wide  fracture  systems  extending  through  the  crust,  and 
weakening  it,  and  the  remarkable  similarity  of  these  patterns 
to  those  which,  theoretically,  would  result  from  a  movement 
of  the  crust.  Dr.  Einstein  expressed  the  keenest  interest  in 
this  evidence. 

Mr.  Hapgood  referred  to  the  Hough-Urry  findings  of  the 
dates  of  climatic  change  in  Antarctica  during  the  Pleistocene. 
Dr.  Einstein  stated  that  the  method  of  radioactive  dating  de- 
veloped by  W.  D.  Urry  was  sound  and  reliable.  As  a  re- 
sult, Dr.  Einstein  was  in  full  agreement  that  the  data  from 
Antarctica,  indicating  that  that  continent  enjoyed  a  tem- 
perate climate  at  a  time  when  a  continental  icecap  lay  over 
much  of  North  America,  virtually  compel  the  conclusion  that 
a  shift  of  the  earth's  entire  crust  must  have  taken  place. 

Dr.  Einstein  asked  Mr.  Hapgood  what  objections  geologists 
had  been  making  to  the  theory.  Mr.  Hapgood  replied  that 
it  was  principally  a  question  of  the  number  of  such  move- 
ments, Urry's  evidence  would  imply  four  such  displacements 
at  irregular  intervals  during  the  last  50,000  years.1  Dr.  Ein- 
stein replied  that  this  seemed  to  be  a  large  number.  How- 
ever, he  said,  if  the  evidence  could  not  be  explained  in  any 
other  way,  even  this  large  number  would  have  to  be  accepted. 
The  gradualistic  notions  common  in  geology  were,  in  his 
opinion,  merely  a  habit  of  mind,  and  were  not  necessarily 
justified  by  the  empirical  data. 

At  this  point  the  discussion  turned  to  astronomy.  Mr.  Hap- 
good did  not  understand  why  men  who  would  boggle  at  the 
rate  of  change  required  by  the  theory  of  crustal  movements 
thought  nothing  of  accepting  the  view  that  the  entire  uni- 
verse had  been  created  in  half  an  hour.  Dr.  Einstein  said  that, 
unfortunately,  the  evidence  seemed  to  point  that  way.  After 

iThis  figure  was  subsequently  revised,  in  the  light  of  much  geological  evi- 
dence (Chs.  VII,  VIII,  IX),  to  three  displacements  in  the  last  130,000  years. 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  365 

considerable  discussion  he  added  that  it  was  not,  however, 
necessary  to  take  the  present  state  of  our  knowledge  very 
seriously.  Future  developments  might  show  us  how  to  reach 
a  different  conclusion  from  the  evidence.  Much  that  we  re- 
gard as  knowledge  today  may  someday  be  regarded  as  error. 
Toward  the  end  of  the  interview  Dr.  Einstein  indicated  a 
number  of  points  where  further  research  would  be  desirable. 
He  suggested  the  need  for  a  gravitational  study  of  the  Antarc- 
tic continent,  and  for  a  study  of  the  rates  of  crustal  adjust- 
ment to  increasing  or  decreasing  loads  of  ice.  He  commented 
upon  the  difficulties  that  confront  those  who  wish  to  intro- 
duce new  theories,  and  quoted  Planck's  remark  that  theories 
change  not  because  anybody  gets  converted  but  because  those 
who  hold  the  old  theories  eventually  die  off. 


7.  Isostasy  and  Centrifugal  Effect 

As  I  have  mentioned,  there  is  a  possibility  of  two  points  of 
view  regarding  the  particular  centrifugal  effect  postulated 
by  Campbell  and  myself.  It  is  therefore  necessary  to  provide 
additional  clarification  of  some  of  the  points  at  issue.  To  a 
certain  extent  it  may  be  a  question  of  a  situation  in  which 
new  definitions  or  clearer  definitions  of  accustomed  terms 
are  called  for,  but  it  also  appears  to  us  that  in  some  cases,  at 
least,  physicists  whom  we  have  consulted  in  the  course  of  our 
work  are  proceeding  upon  the  basis  of  assumptions  that  are 
in  conflict  with  ours.  Therefore,  it  is  necessary  to  re-examine 
these  assumptions.  A  comprehensive  discussion  of  the  matter 
must  begin  with  a  review  of  the  broader  questions  of  the 
mechanics  of  rotation  already  briefly  referred  to  in  the  In- 
troduction. 

The  existence  of  a  very  common  misunderstanding  re- 
garding the  mechanics  of  the  earth's  rotation,  particularly 
related  to  the  problem  of  the  stability  of  the  poles,  was  made 
clear  to  me  by  a  difference  of  opinion  that  arose  at  the  be- 
ginning of  my  inquiry.  Brown,  whose  work  was  the  starting 


366  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

point  of  my  own,  was  an  engineer,  and  his  concepts  of  the 
earth's  motions  were  based  upon  simple  mechanics.  He  un- 
derstood gyroscopic  action,  and  the  stabilizing  role  of  the  rim 
of  a  rotating  flywheel.  He  also  understood  the  laws  of  cen- 
trifugal effect  as  applied  to  weights  eccentric  to  the  axes  of 
spin  of  rotating  bodies.  It  was  my  good  fortune  that  Camp- 
bell, who  was  to  carry  the  work  forward,  also  was  a  mechan- 
ical engineer. 

Brown  had  made  the  statement  that  it  was  the  equatorial 
bulge  of  the  globe  that  stabilized  it  with  reference  to  the  axis 
of  rotation;  he  had  compared  it  to  the  rim  of  a  flywheel.  I 
found  that  this  statement  was  disputed  by  some  physicists. 
The  physicists  suggested  that  the  stability  of  the  earth  on 
its  axis  was  not  owing  to  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the  rota- 
tion of  the  equatorial  bulge  alone,  but  to  that  of  the  rotation 
of  the  entire  mass  of  the  earth.  Later  I  discovered  a  passage 
in  Coleman  that  appeared  to  express  their  point  of  view: 

It  may  be  suggested  that  the  earth  is  a  gyroscope,  and,  as  such,  has 
a  very  powerful  tendency  to  keep  its  axis  of  rotation  pointing  con- 
tinuously in  the  same  direction.  Any  sudden  change  in  the  direction 
would  probably  wreck  the  world  completely  (87:263). 

I  wished  to  obtain  a  clear  statement  of  the  rights  of  this 
matter.  Accordingly,  I  corresponded  with  specialists,  who 
eventually  referred  me  to  the  works  of  James  Clerk  Max- 
well, in  one  of  whose  papers  I  found  the  following  statement 
in  support  of  Brown's  position: 

.  .  .  The  permanence  of  latitude  essentially  depends  on  the  in- 
equality of  the  earth's  axes,  for  if  they  had  all  been  equal,  any  altera- 
tion of  the  crust  of  the  earth  would  have  produced  new  principal 
axes,  and  the  axis  of  rotation  would  travel  round  about  those  axes, 
altering  the  latitudes  of  all  places,  and  yet  not  in  the  least  altering 
the  position  of  the  axis  of  rotation  among  the  stars  (296:261). 

For  the  word  "axes"  in  the  second  line  we  may  read  "diame- 
ters," and  of  course  Maxwell  is  referring  to  the  inequality 
of  the  polar  and  equatorial  diameters,  that  is,  to  the  existence 
of  the  equatorial  bulge,  to  which,  therefore,  he  directly  at- 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  367 

tributes  the  stability  of  the  earth  on  its  axis  of  rotation. 

Maxwell,  in  the  foregoing  passage,  suggests  that  in  the  ab- 
sence of  the  equatorial  bulge,  any  change  in  the  crust  (mean- 
ing, it  is  clear,  the  creation  of  any  protuberance  or  excess 
weight  at  any  point)  would  change  the  position  of  the  planet 
on  the  axis  of  rotation.  Even  before  I  located  this  passage  in 
Maxwell,  a  peculiar  device  designed  by  Brown  had  made  this 
principle  clear  to  me  by  observation.  This  device  consisted 
of  a  globe  mounted  on  three  trunnions  in  such  a  way  that  it 
could  rotate  in  any  direction.  The  globe  was  a  perfect  sphere 
and  had  no  equatorial  bulge.  It  was  suspended  by  a  string 
to  an  overhead  point.  To  rotate  this  sphere,  all  that  was 
necessary  was  to  wind  it  up  and  then  let  it  go.  Brown  had  a 
weight  attached  to  the  South  Pole  of  the  sphere,  and  it  was 
observable  that,  as  soon  as  the  sphere  began  to  rotate  rapidly, 
the  weight  was  flung  to  the  equator,  where  it  stabilized  the 
direction  of  rotation  as  long  as  the  speed  of  rotation  was 
maintained.  Later  Campbell  made  a  larger  model  of  Brown's 
device,  which  I  rotated  unweighted,  and  I  observed  that  it 
had  no  stable  axis  of  spin.  Two  motions  were  observable:  a 
rapid  rotation,  and  a  slow,  random  drifting.  It  was  evident 
that  the  mass  of  the  sphere  acted  as  a  stabilizer  of  the  speed 
of  rotation,  but  had  no  influence  on  its  direction.  This  ex- 
periment, strongly  confirming  Brown's  claim,  encouraged  me 
to  persist  until  I  could  find  positive  theoretical  confirmation 
of  the  observation,  which  eventually  I  did  in  the  works  of 
Maxwell. 

I  was  amazed  and  chagrined  in  this  connection  to  note  a 
phenomenon  which,  nevertheless,  is  as  old  as  science  itself. 
The  professors— most  of  them,  at  any  rate—would  not  come  to 
see  the  device. 

Perhaps  I  should  describe  this  device  in  greater  detail. 
A  trunnion  is  like  a  ring  or  a  hoop,  made  of  metal.  A  globe 
is  mounted  in  this  trunnion  on  two  pivots  set  into  the  ring 
at  points  opposite  each  other  (180  degrees  apart).  Then,  if 
the  ring  is  held  (as  it  often  is  on  a  model  globe)  by  a  pedi- 
ment or  stand,  the  globe  will  rotate.  Its  axis  will  be  deter- 


368  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

mined  by  the  fixed  positions  of  the  pivots  set  into  the  ring. 

Now,  if,  instead  of  fixing  the  ring  into  a  stand,  or  pedi- 
ment, we  set  it  into  another,  larger  ring,  by  inserting  two 
pivots  into  the  larger  ring  at  two  points  at  right  angles  to 
those  of  the  inner  ring,  we  have  an  axis  within  an  axis,  and 
the  globe  can  be  made  to  rotate  in  either  direction.  If  a  third 
ring  is  used,  then  the  globe  has  freedom  of  action  in  any 
direction  whatever. 

There  is  still  the  problem  of  imparting  momentum  to  this 
globe.  Since  it  has  no  fixed  axis,  this  is  a  difficult  problem. 
Brown  solved  it  by  suspending  the  device  to  the  ceiling  by 
a  string  attached  to  the  outermost  trunnion.  This  string 
could  be  wound  up  by  rotating  the  outermost  trunnion  in 
one  direction  by  hand  for  a  while,  just  as  a  boy  may  wind 
up  the  rubber  bands  used  to  give  momentum  to  a  toy  air- 
plane. Then,  when  the  trunnion  is  released,  the  string  un- 
winds, putting  the  globe  itself  in  rapid  rotation,  but  a  free 
rotation,  one  not  confined  to  a  fixed  axis. 

In  view  of  continued  skepticism,  I  could  not  be  entirely 
satisfied  by  the  Maxwell  statement,  supported  though  it 
might  be  by  the  demonstration.  Since  I  am  not  myself  a 
physicist,  I  felt  it  not  unlikely  that  some  persons  would  con- 
clude that,  in  the  first  place,  I  had  misunderstood  Maxwell, 
and  that,  in  the  second  place,  I  was  incapable  of  interpreting 
correctly  the  evidence  of  my  eyes.  I  therefore  wished  to  ob- 
tain an  authoritative  interpretation  of  Maxwell's  statement, 
and,  accordingly,  I  wrote  Dr.  Harlow  Shapley,  the  Director 
of  the  Harvard  Observatory,  as  follows: 

After  a  year  of  intensive  work  with  a  group  of  people  here,  I  have 
concluded  that  the  work  we  are  doing  is  dependent  upon  a  clear 
answer  to  the  question  as  to  whether  the  geographical  poles  are  stabi- 
lized by  the  momentum  of  rotation  of  the  earth,  or  solely  by  that  of 
the  equatorial  bulge.  I  have  had  discussions  about  this  with  Dr. 
Adams  of  the  Coast  and  Geodetic  Survey,  and  with  Dr.  Clemence  of 
the  Naval  Observatory.  They  have  given  me  references  to  the  work 
of  Clerk  Maxwell  and  others,  without  quite  satisfying  me.  I  am  not, 
of  course,  equipped  to  understand  all  of  the  technicalities,  but  I  am 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  369 

hoping  that  you  can  give  me  a  steer  in  nontechnical  terms  on  the  gen- 
eral concepts. 

My  hunch  is  that,  contrary  to  a  widespread  impression,  it  is  the 
bulge  alone  that  stabilizes  the  geographical  poles.  As  I  reason  it  out, 
if  the  earth  were  a  perfect  sphere,  the  energy  of  its  rotation,  derived 
from  its  mass  in  motion,  would  "stabilize"  the  speed  of  the  rotation, 
but  would  have  no  reference  to  its  direction.  If  we  suppose  that  some- 
body could  reach  out  from  Mars  with  a  pole,  and  give  the  earth  a 
strong  push  at  an  angle  of  90°  from  the  direction  of  rotation,  the 
earth  would  be  shifted  on  the  axis  of  rotation  to  an  extent  de- 
termined by  the  ratio  of  the  force  of  the  push  to  the  mass  of  the 
earth.  In  fact,  if  the  earth  had  no  bulge,  it  would  never  have  stable 
poles,  but  would  rotate  every  which  way.  .  .  . 

If  my  view  of  the  matter  is  sound,  important  consequences  follow, 
but  I  am  not  quite  certain  of  the  validity  of  my  premises. 

Dr.  Shapley's  reply,  dated  February  2,  1951,  was,  in  part, 
as  follows: 

Dr.  [Harold]  Jeffreys  was  fortunately  here  at  the  Harvard  Ob- 
servatory and  I  could  turn  over  your  inquiry  to  him.  I  now  have  his 
reply.  He  says  in  effect  that  the  fullest  discussion  of  the  points  men- 
tioned by  you  is  in  Routh's  Rigid  Dynamics,  probably  in  volume  I. 
Most  textbooks  of  rigid  dynamics  will  have  something  about  it.  The 
theory  goes  back  to  Euler.  Really  both  the  rotation  and  the  equa- 
torial bulge  are  needed  to  maintain  stability.  Without  rotation  the 
body  could  be  at  rest  at  any  position;  with  rotation  but  without  the 
equatorial  bulge  it  could  rotate  permanently  about  an  axis  in  any 
direction.  .  .  .  (343). 

With  this  statement  I  decided  to  rest  content.  It  seemed  to 
me  that  Brown's  position  in  the  matter  was  correct.  Maxwell 
showed  both  by  the  use  of  his  dynamical  top  and  theoretically 
what  Brown  showed  by  his  device:  that  a  rotating  sphere 
tends  to  throw  the  heaviest  weights  on  its  surface  to  the 
equator  of  spin.  Maxwell  and,  after  him,  George  H.  Darwin 
recognized  that  the  equatorial  bulge  of  the  globe  stabilized 
the  direction  of  the  earth's  rotation  just  as  a  weight  on  the 
surface  of  a  model  sphere  would  do  when  the  sphere  was 
rotated  rapidly. 

Yet  there  is  a  distinct  difference  between  the  earth  and 
the  model  globe.  The  earth's  approximately  round  shape  is 


370  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

not  due  to  the  fact  that  it  is  a  strong,  rigid  body,  for  it  is  not. 
Its  roundness  is  due  primarily  to  the  force  of  gravity,  which 
in  fact  holds  the  earth  together.  The  earth  as  a  whole  is  a  very 
weak  body,  and  if  it  were  not  for  the  effect  of  gravity  the  cen- 
trifugal effect  of  the  rotation  would  disrupt  the  earth  and 
send  all  its  component  masses  hurtling  outwards  into  inter- 
stellar space. 

There  is  also  a  difference  between  the  equatorial  bulge  of 
the  earth  and  a  weight  attached  to  the  surface  of  a  model 
globe  at  its  equator  of  spin.  This  difference  consists  in  the 
fact  that  the  earth's  equatorial  bulge  and  the  flattenings  at 
its  poles  have  been  produced  by  the  yielding  of  the  earth's 
body  in  response  to  the  centrifugal  effect  of  its  rotation.  The 
amount  of  the  yielding  has  been  determined  by  the  ratio  of 
the  forces  of  rotation  and  gravity.  The  shape  of  the  earth 
thus  represents  a  balance  of  these  two  forces,  a  balance  that 
is  perfect,  theoretically,  at  every  point  of  the  earth's  surface. 
It  therefore  follows  that  any  unit  of  material  in  this  balanced 
surface  will  be  at  rest.  For  this  reason,  such  a  surface  has 
been  called  an  equipotential  surface. 

The  balance  of  the  forces  of  rotation  and  gravity  at  every 
point  of  the  earth's  surface  can  be  understood  also  in  this 
way.  The  shape  of  the  earth,  as  we  have  pointed  out,  is  ob- 
late. This  means  that  as  you  go  toward  the  equator  you  are 
getting  farther  from  the  earth's  center.  In  a  sense,  therefore, 
you  are  going  uphill.  Likewise,  when  you  are  going  toward 
the  poles  you  are  getting  closer  to  the  earth's  center  and 
therefore  you  are  going  downhill.  But  we  can  all  see  that 
it  takes  no  more  energy  to  move  toward  the  equator  than  it 
does  toward  a  pole.  Also,  water  in  the  ocean  does  not  run 
downhill  toward  the  poles.  The  earth's  surface  acts  as  if  it 
were  perfectly  level.  The  reason  for  this  is  that  as  you  go 
toward  the  equator,  going  uphill,  the  centrifugal  effect  of 
the  earth's  rotation  increases  just  enough  to  compensate  for 
the  gradient,  while,  if  you  move  toward  the  poles,  the  cen- 
trifugal effect  declines  in  proportion.  The  forces  of  gravity 
and  rotation  are  therefore  balanced,  and  no  centrifugal  e£- 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  371 

feet  will  tend  to  propel  a  mass  in  this  equipotential  surface 
toward  the  equator,  and  no  gravitational  effect  will  tend  to 
propel  it  toward  the  poles.  The  fact  that  the  force  of  gravity 
is  absolutely  much  greater  than  the  centrifugal  effect  of  the 
rotation  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  the  flattening  of  the  earth 
is  very  slight.  The  equatorial  bulge  amounts  to  6.7  miles  in 
comparison  with  the  earth's  mean  radius  of  4,000  miles.  This 
is  a  ratio  of  only  .017  per  cent. 

The  past  century  has  been  notable  for  extensive  studies 
of  the  effects  of  gravity  at  the  earth's  surface.  The  theory  of 
isostasy  has  been  developed,  and  the  actually  existing  state  of 
balance  of  the  surface  features  of  the  earth's  crust  has  been 
measured  in  various  ways  and  for  various  purposes.  As  we 
have  seen,  there  are  various  difficulties  with  the  theory  of 
isostasy,  some  of  which  may  be  soluble  in  terms  of  the  theory 
presented  in  this  book.  At  the  same  time,  but  independently, 
studies  of  centrifugal  effects  at  the  earth's  surface  have  been 
undertaken.  Eotvos  investigated  the  centrifugal  effects  that 
would  arise  if  a  given  mass  had  its  center  of  gravity  above 
the  equipotential  surface.  This  could  occur  even  with  masses 
in  isostatic  equilibrium.  To  visualize  this  case,  we  may  take 
the  example  of  a  block  of  ice  floating  in  water. 

Ice  is  lighter  than  water.  When  a  block  of  ice  falls  into 
a  body  of  water  it  displaces  its  own  weight  of  water,  and 
then  floats  with  a  tenth  of  its  mass  above  the  water  level.  It 
is  now  in  equilibrium,  or  in  isostatic  adjustment,  even 
though  its  upper  part  projects  a  considerable  distance  up  out 
of  the  water.  This  upper  tenth,  in  the  meantime,  has  dis- 
placed air,  not  water.  It  is  a  solid  mass  of  far  greater  density 
than  the  air  it  has  displaced.  Its  center  of  gravity,  midway 
between  its  summit  and  the  water  surface,  is  farther  from 
the  axis  of  rotation  of  the  earth  than  was  that  of  the  mass 
of  water  it  has  displaced.  Since  points  move  faster  with  the 
earth's  rotation  the  farther  they  are  from  this  axis,  this  mass 
has  now  been  given  added  velocity.  Added  velocity  means 
an  increase  in  the  centrifugal  effect,  and  one  not  compensated 
by  gravity,  since  the  amount  of  mass  is  the  same  as  before, 


372  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

and  therefore  the  effect  of  gravity  at  that  point  has  not  been 
altered.  A  tangential  component  of  this  added  centrifugal 
momentum  will  tend  to  move  this  ice  mass  toward  the 
equator. 

Eotvos  applied  this  same  principle  to  parts  of  the  earth's 
crust.  We  have  seen  that,  according  to  the  theory  of  isos- 
tasy,  mountains  and  continents  are  elevated  above  the  ocean 
bottoms  because  they  are  composed  of  lighter  materials,  and 
they  are  considered  to  be  '  'floating"  in  an  approximate  gravi- 
tational balance  with  the  heavier  crustal  formations  under 
the  oceans.  Eotvos  considered  the  centrifugal  effects  that 
might  arise  from  the  elevations  of  the  centers  of  gravity  of 
continental  formations  above  those  of  the  oceanic  sectors  of 
the  crust,  and  calculated  them  mathematically.  He  found 
that  the  effects  were  comparatively  slight.  Attempts  have 
been  made  to  account  for  the  drift  of  continents  through 
these  effects,  but  his  calculations  show  they  are  too  small  to 
have  considerable  effects.  Since  Eotvos'  time,  it  has  been 
generally  assumed  that  any  centrifugal  effects  that  were  to  be 
considered  in  relationship  to  the  earth's  crust  must  be  ef- 
fects resulting  from  variations  in  the  vertical  position  of  cen- 
ters of  gravity  of  masses  in  gravitational  balance,  that  is,  ele- 
vations of  these  centers  above  the  equipotential  surface,  or 
depressions  of  them  below  it,  owing  to  differences  in  relative 
density  of  the  masses  involved. 

Let  us  now  consider,  in  connection  with  this,  the  effect  of 
departures  of  given  masses  from  the  state  of  isostatic  or  gravi- 
tational equilibrium.  We  have  already  seen  that  there  are 
remarkable  departures  from  isostatic  balance,  some  resulting 
from  deformities  of  the  crust,  and  some,  it  seems,  from  the 
accumulation  of  icecaps.  In  these  irregularities  in  the  dis- 
tribution of  matter,  resulting  from  the  limited  failure  of 
isostatic  adjustment,  we  must  recognize  the  existence  of  an- 
other surface  of  the  earth,  in  contradistinction  to  the  equipo- 
tential or  geoidal  surface  already  mentioned.  We  may  call 
this  surface  the  gravitational  surface,  or  the  surface  of  equal 
mass.  This  is  a  real  surface.  It  is  not,  however,  the  visible 


CAMPBELL'S  MECHANISM  373 

surface.  A  high  plateau  may  represent  an  area  of  deficient 
mass,  and  an  ocean  basin  may  represent  an  area  of  excess 
mass.  We  have  seen  that  there  are  many  oceanic  areas  that 
show  positive  isostatic  anomalies,  or  the  existence  of  local 
excesses  of  mass  in  the  earth's  crust.  We  can  easily  see  the 
distinction  between  the  level  equipotential  surface  of  the 
geoid,  represented  by  sea  level,  and  the  surface  of  mass  that 
may  deviate  considerably  from  the  level  surface. 

The  mechanism  for  crust  displacement  presented  in  this 
book  depends  upon  recognition  of  the  fact  that  distortions  of 
mass  on  the  earth's  surface,  of  whatever  type,  if  they  consti- 
tute anomalous  additions  of  mass  at  points  on  the  earth's 
surface,  will  give  rise  to  centrifugal  effects  like  the  effect  of 
the  mass  attached  to  the  surface  of  Brown's  rotating  model 
sphere,  in  accordance  with  ordinary  principles  of  mechanics, 
and  measurable  by  the  standard  formula  for  calculating 
centrifugal  effects. 

An  example  may  serve  to  illustrate  the  difference  between 
the  surface  of  mass,  which  differs  in  elevation  from  place  to 
place,  and  the  equipotential,  geoidal  surface.  Let  us  take  a 
fictional  case  of  a  mass  out  of  isostatic  adjustment  but  with 
its  center  of  gravity  below  the  surface  of  the  geoid.  Let  us 
suppose  that  under  the  bottom  of  the  Atlantic  Ocean  we 
have  a  slab  of  material  ten  times  as  dense  as  basalt,  two  thou- 
sand miles  long,  one  thousand  miles  wide,  and  forty  miles 
thick.  The  excess  of  mass  in  this  slab,  as  compared  with  other 
sectors  of  the  crust,  would  be  enormous,  and  gravity  would 
be  greater  at  the  surface.  Consequently,  the  ocean  level  over 
this  area  would  be  affected  slightly,  but  the  shape  of  the  geoid 
would  not  be  significantly  changed,  and  the  sea  level  would 
still  represent  an  equipotential  surface.  The  center  of  grav- 
ity of  the  anomalous  mass  of  high  density  would  be  depressed 
far  below  sea  level;  it  might  be  fifteen  or  twenty  miles  below 
the  geoidal  surface.  Now  if  the  slab  were  of  average  density, 
the  depression  of  the  center  of  gravity  would  mean  an  in- 
verse Eotvos  effect,  that  is,  a  poleward  centrifugal  effect,  the 
quantity  of  which,  as  we  have  seen,  would  be  slight.  But,  now, 


374  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

to  counteract  this,  the  rotation  of  the  earth,  acting  on  this 
mass  of  ten  times  normal  density,  would  produce  a  centrifu- 
gal effect  ten  times  as  great  as  the  one  normally  balanced  at 
that  point  by  the  effects  of  gravity.  Let  us  note  the  fact  that 
the  assumption  that  this  slab  is  not  isostatically  compensated 
involves  the  consequence  that  the  centrifugal  momentum 
resulting  from  it  is  not  compensated. 

The  difference  between  an  Eotvos  effect  and  one  produced 
by  an  uncompensated  mass  may  be  illustrated  in  another 
way.  Let  us  return  to  our  example  of  a  mass  of  ice.  Campbell 
has  suggested  the  example  of  an  iceberg  before  and  after  its 
separation  from  its  parent,  land-based  icecap.  It  is  assumed 
that  the  icecap  is  uncompensated.  The  iceberg,  breaking  off 
from  the  icecap,  falls  into  the  water.  Before  this  event  the 
icecap,  by  assumption,  is  outside  the  equilibrium  surface  of 
the  geoid;  the  rotation  of  the  earth  acts  upon  it  precisely  as 
the  rotation  of  Brown's  model  sphere  acts  upon  the  weight 
fixed  to  its  surface. 

But  let  us  see  what  happens  when  the  iceberg  falls  into 
the  sea.  It  now  reaches  gravitational  equilibrium.  It  sinks, 
and  displaces  its  weight  in  water.  It  is  now  a  part  of  the  equi- 
potential  surface  of  the  geoid  (though  the  portion  projecting 
above  sea  level  is  not,  and  therefore  exerts  an  Eotvos  effect). 

Now  what  is  the  quantitative  relationship  between  the 
Eotvos  effect  and  the  original  centrifugal  effect  of  the  ice- 
berg? It  is  plain  that  now  nine  tenths  of  the  ice  is  within 
the  equilibrium  surface.  For  this  nine  tenths  of  the  mass  the 
equatorward  centrifugal  momentum  produced  by  the  earth's 
rotation  is  precisely  cancelled  by  the  poleward  component  of 
the  force  of  gravity  at  that  point,  so  that  there  is  no  net  cen- 
trifugal effect.  Only  one  tenth  of  the  ice  remains  to  exert  an 
effect,  and  the  quantity  of  this  effect,  furthermore,  is  de- 
termined by  the  elevation  of  the  center  of  gravity  of  this 
tenth  of  the  iceberg  above  sea  level.  But  the  elevation  has 
been  enormously  reduced.  It  has,  in  fact,  been  reduced  to  one 
tenth  of  the  elevation  of  the  center  of  gravity  before  the  fall 
of  the  iceberg  into  the  sea.  Campbell  has  pointed  out  that, 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  375 

as  a  result,  the  centrifugal  momentum  not  compensated  by 
gravity  has  now  been  reduced  to  one  one  hundredth  of  the 
quantity  of  the  effect  of  the  ice  mass  when  it  was  totally 
uncompensated. 

It  appears,  therefore,  that  the  question  as  to  whether  a 
mass  is  in  isostatic  adjustment  or  not  is  the  essence  of  the 
matter.  The  icecap,  if  totally  uncompensated,  may  produce 
a  centrifugal  effect  one  hundred  times  the  Eotvos  effect  for 
the  same  mass;  furthermore,  it  may  be  calculated  by  the 
formula  used  by  Campbell,  with  the  reservation  that  a  small 
poleward  component  of  gravity  caused  by  the  oblateness  of 
the  earth  and  proportional  to  the  degree  of  the  oblateness 
must  be  taken  into  consideration. 

Let  us  attempt  to  define  and  clarify  this  poleward  compo- 
nent of  the  force  of  gravity,  and  to  estimate  its  probable  rela- 
tive magnitude.  It  applies  both  to  masses  in  equilibrium  but 
with  elevated  centers  of  gravity,  and  to  any  mass  resting  on 
the  earth's  surface  but  uncompensated.  Its  effect  will  be 
greater  in  the  latter  case  than  in  the  former.  In  both  cases  it 
will  tend  to  counteract  the  equatorward  component  of  the 
centrifugal  effect  of  the  icecap. 

The  poleward  component  of  the  force  of  gravity  results 
from  the  oblateness  of  the  earth.  It  may  be  visualized  as  fol- 
lows: if  you  should  place  a  marble  at  the  equator,  and  if  the 
rotation  of  the  earth  should  be  interrupted  so  that  the  earth 
would  be  at  rest,  then  the  marble  would  tend  to  roll  toward 
one  of  the  poles,  because  the  poles  are  closer  to  the  center  of 
the  earth,  and  therefore  downhill.  As  I  have  mentioned,  this 
applies  both  to  masses  out  of  isostatic  equilibrium,  and  to 
those  in  equilibrium,  but  with  elevated  centers  of  gravity 
(that  is,  to  masses  standing  higher  because  of  their  lesser  aver- 
age density).  However,  as  I  have  pointed  out,  there  will  be  a 
quantitative  difference  between  the  poleward  effects  of  gravity 
in  these  two  cases  of  about  100:1. 

In  both  cases  these  effects  would  tend  to  counterbalance 
the  equatorward  component  of  the  total  centrifugal  effect  of 
the  icecap.  The  question  is:  What  proportion  of  the  equator- 


376  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

ward  effect  would  be  thus  counterbalanced?  This  is  the  crux 
of  the  matter. 

The  answer  to  this  problem  may  be  found  in  the  following 
consideration.  The  force  with  which  any  object  rolls  down- 
hill is  proportionate  not  only  to  its  weight  but  to  the  gradient 
of  the  slope.  On  a  flat  surface  the  marble  is  at  rest.  It  would 
develop  maximum  momentum  if  it  could  fall  straight  down 
toward  the  earth's  center  (if  the  surface  were  vertical).  Be- 
tween these  extremes  of  zero  and  maximum  momentum  there 
must  be  an  even  curve  of  increasing  momentum  with  increas- 
ing gradient.  (It  would  follow,  of  course,  that  a  sled  would 
develop  twice  the  momentum  if  going  down  a  hill  twice  as 
steep.) 

To  apply  this  principle  to  the  icecap,  we  may  observe  that 
if  there  were  no  oblateness  to  the  earth,  there  would  be  no 
poleward  component  of  gravity.  If,  on  the  other  hand,  the 
oblateness  were  increased  to  the  point  where  the  icecap  could 
fall  straight  down,  it  would  develop  maximum  momentum, 
the  product  of  its  velocity  and  of  its  weight.  Between  these 
extremes,  the  poleward  momentum  would  be  proportional  to 
the  gradient.  We  have  seen,  however,  that  this  gradient 
amounts  to  only  .017  per  cent.  It  follows  from  this  that  the 
poleward  component  of  gravity  acting  on  the  icecap  will  be 
.017  per  cent  of  the  tangential  component  of  the  centrifugal 
effect  of  the  icecap.  This  of  course  is  a  relatively  negligible 
quantity. 

It  may  be  objected  that  in  this  discussion  we  have  offered 
no  mathematical  calculations  in  support  of  the  positions  taken, 
and  that  therefore  we  have  no  quantitative  basis  for  our  the- 
ory. This  is,  however,  a  misunderstanding.  It  is  essential,  be- 
fore mathematical  computations  are  made,  to  understand  the 
assumptions  on  which  they  are  based.  In  our  correspondence 
we  have  more  than  once  received  communications  in  which 
the  authors  have  indirectly  or  directly  stated  that  the  question 
as  to  whether  a  given  mass  was  or  was  not  isostatically  com- 
pensated was  irrelevant.  It  has  seemed  to  us,  on  the  other  hand, 
that  the  actual  balanced  surface  or  shape  of  the  earth  as  de- 


CAMPBELL'S   MECHANISM  377 

termined  by  the  balance  of  gravity  and  the  centrifugal  effect 
of  the  rotation— that  is,  the  geoid,  or  the  equipotential  surfaces 
—while  perfectly  valid  as  an  assumption  for  many  calcula- 
tions, was  irrelevant  for  our  problem.  We  feel  it  must  be 
conceded  that  if  the  conformity  of  the  earth's  materials  in 
general  to  the  balance  of  the  two  forces  of  gravity  and  rotation, 
so  as  to  create  the  oblate  shape  of  the  earth— the  geoid— is  im- 
portant, the  failure  of  some  of  the  materials  to  conform  to 
this  shape  is  also  important.  By  definition,  a  mass  that  is  not 
isostatically  compensated  fails  to  conform  to  this  shape.  Thus 
the  real  surface  of  mass  differs  from  the  geoid,  and  cannot 
be  called  an  equipotential  surface.  We  feel  that  the  real  "sur- 
face of  mass"  of  the  earth  cannot  be  disregarded. 

In  this  situation  equations  are  of  no  use.  They  will  not  help 
us  attain  clarity.  What  is  needed  instead  is  a  re-examination 
of  the  assumptions  on  which  equations  have  been  made.  This 
is  an  intellectual  problem  of  the  logical  development  of  ideas, 
and  corresponds  to  the  process  advocated  by  Maxwell  as  supe- 
rior, in  some  situations,  to  calculations.  Discussing  the  intri- 
cacies of  the  mechanics  of  rotation  before  the  Royal  Society, 
Maxwell  remarked: 

...  If  any  further  progress  is  to  be  made  in  simplifying  and 
arranging  the  theory,  it  must  be  by  the  method  that  Poinsot  has  re- 
peatedly pointed  out  as  the  only  one  that  can  lead  to  a  true  knowl- 
edge of  the  subject— that  of  proceeding  from  one  distinct  idea  to  an- 
other, instead  of  trusting  to  symbols  and  equations  (296:24811). 

Let  us  remember  that  the  author  of  this  remark  was  one 
of  the  greatest  mathematical  physicists  of  all  time.  As  such, 
he  understood  the  limitations  of  mathematics,  of  which  the 
most  essential  is  that  all  calculations  must  be  based  in  the 
last  analysis  on  assumptions  that  consist  of  clear  ideas,  logically 
expressible  in  words. 

I  do  not  wish  to  have  it  seem,  however,  that  I  am  conced- 
ing the  point  that  Mr.  Campbell  and  I  have  not  provided 
quantitative  solutions.  On  the  contrary,  I  believe  that,  on  the 
basis  of  the  assumptions  discussed  above,  Mr.  Campbell  has 
provided  sound  and  adequate  (though  approximate)  quanti- 


378  EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 

tative  estimates  for  the  equatorward  component  of  the  cen- 
trifugal effect  of  the  icecap,  and  furthermore,  that  he  has 
indicated  the  correct  order  of  magnitude  of  the  bursting 
stresses  that  may  be  produced  in  the  crust. 


XII  :  CONCLUSION 


i.  Looking  Forward 

It  is  said  that  a  sound  scientific  hypothesis  should  have  the 
character  of  predictability.  "Predictability"  is  said  to  apply 
to  a  hypothesis  if  the  hypothesis  predicts  the  discovery  of  new 
facts  that  later  are  actually  discovered.  An  example  of  pre- 
dictability of  this  sort  was  the  discovery  some  years  ago  of 
Pluto  as  the  result  of  calculations  based  on  the  theory 
of  gravitation.  Our  theory  has  repeatedly  shown  that  it  pos- 
sesses this  sort  of  predictability.  On  one  occasion  Campbell 
worked  out,  from  purely  theoretical  considerations,  the  pat- 
terns of  crustal  fractures  that  would  be  formed  by  a  dis- 
placement. At  the  same  time,  in  a  different  city  and  entirely 
independently  of  him,  I  was  discovering,  in  the  works  of  W. 
H.  Hobbs,  geological  evidence  showing  that  fracture  pat- 
terns of  precisely  this  kind  actually  existed  in  the  rocks. 
Only  later  did  we  compare  results.  If  I  had  started  with  his 
drawings  and  used  them  to  guide  my  research  in  the  field, 
I  would  have  found  approximately  the  fracture  patterns  that 
he  predicted,  and  I  would  have  found  them  sooner.  On 
another  occasion  when,  in  1951,  radiocarbon  dates  showed 
the  very  recent  end  of  the  North  American  ice  sheet,  I 
reached  the  conclusion  from  the  theory  that  the  begin- 
ning of  that  glaciation  must  have  been  quite  recent,  and 
much  more  recent  than  generally  believed.  At  that  time 
this  conclusion  could  not  be  tested,  because  the  range  o£ 
the  radiocarbon  method  was  not  great  enough.  However, 
I  was  aware  of  the  fact  that  several  scientists  were  work- 
ing on  the  problem  of  extending  the  range,  and  I  confidently 
looked  forward  to  a  confirmation  of  the  theory  when  and  if 
the  range  was  extended.  I  had  to  wait  only  until  1954,  when 
Horberg,  as  already  mentioned,  published  results  showing 


380  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

that  the  icecap  had  entered  Ohio  only  25,000  years  ago. 
Again  and  again  we  have  had  experiences  similar  to  this. 
Campbell  has,  in  fact,  suggested  that  the  theory  may  have 
economic  importance  because  of  the  fact  that  it  may  give 
us  a  tool  through  which  we  may  attain  more  reliable  infor- 
mation about  the  hidden  structures  of  the  earth's  crust,  and 
thus  be  able  to  locate  valuable  minerals.  It  seems  to  me 
quite  possible  that  his  hope  will  eventually  be  realized. 

Our  theory  appears  to  have  another  kind  of  predictability. 
It  is  possible  that  it  can  tell  us  something  about  the  rela- 
tively near  future  of  the  earth.  The  evidence  appears  to  sug- 
gest that  displacements  have  occurred  at  short  intervals. 
Since  what  has  happened  in  the  past  may  be  expected  to  hap- 
pen in  the  future,  it  is  quite  reasonable  to  ask  when  another 
movement  may  be  expected.  There  are  a  number  of  factors 
that  bear  on  this,  and  they  are  worth  discussing  even  though, 
when  we  get  through,  we  may  carry  away  the  feeling  that  our 
speculations  may  contain  more  imagination  than  substance. 

It  would  appear  from  the  evidence  I  have  presented  that 
the  intervals  between  the  beginnings  of  the  last  three  dis- 
placements were  about  40,000  years  in  length.  It  seems,  also, 
that  the  last  movement  began  between  26,000  and  17,000 
years  ago.  If  these  assumptions  are  correct,  and  if  the  average 
of  these  movements  holds  for  the  future,  it  seems  that  the 
next  displacement  of  the  crust  should  not  be  expected  for 
another  10,000  or  15,000  years.  While  this  is  a  reassuring 
thought,  it  should  be  kept  in  mind,  however,  that  there  are 
a  number  of  unknown  factors  in  the  situation,  and  that  there 
is  no  reason  to  believe  that  the  average  of  the  last  three  dis- 
placements tells  us  anything  about  the  limits  of  variation  in 
the  periods  between  displacements.  On  the  contrary,  the 
conclusion  to  be  reached  from  the  investigation  completed  in 
this  book  is  that  the  periods  between  displacements  may 
vary  considerably. 

A  number  of  factors  favor  a  movement  somewhat  sooner 
than  the  time  indicated  by  the  average  of  the  last  three  dis- 
placements. Among  these,  I  may  mention  the  fact,  empha- 


CONCLUSION  381 

sized  by  Brown,  that  the  present  Antarctic  icecap  is  larger 
than  the  last  North  American  icecap.  If  Campbell's  calcula- 
tions are  close  to  the  truth,  it  seems  that  the  bursting  stresses 
in  the  crust  may  now  be  close  to  the  critical  point,  from  this 
source  alone.  Yet  there  is  also  a  possibility  that  the  centrifu- 
gal effect  of  the  Antarctic  icecap  may  at  the  present  time  be 
supplemented  by  another  significant  centrifugal  effect  cre- 
ated by  the  icecap  in  Greenland.  It  is  true  that  the  Greenland 
cap  is  much  smaller  than  the  one  in  Antarctica,  but,  on  the 
other  hand,  its  center  is  much  farther  from  the  pole.  For 
this  reason  it  could  conceivably  have  an  important  centrifu- 
gal effect.  Its  position  on  the  meridian  is  such  that  any  un- 
compensated  mass  would  add  to  rather  than  counteract  the 
effect  of  the  Antarctic  cap;  the  two  icecaps  are,  so  to  speak, 
in  tandem. 

In  recent  years  a  French  polar  expedition  has  taken  many 
gravity  readings  across  the  top  of  the  Greenland  icecap.  The 
purpose  of  these  readings  was  to  assemble  data  for  a  deter- 
mination of  the  state  of  isostatic  adjustment  of  the  Greenland 
cap.  The  results  of  this  piece  of  research  are  instructive  for 
the  whole  subject  of  isostasy.  They  can  be  read  two  ways.  On 
the  one  hand,  the  gravity  data  when  reduced  according  to 
one  of  the  formulas  in  common  use— the  Faye-Bouguer— - 
showed  an  enormous  excess  of  mass  in  Greenland  (441:60- 
61);  on  the  other  hand,  the  same  data,  when  reinterpreted 
differently,  resulted  in  a  finding  of  good  isostatic  adjust- 
ment. It  is  important  to  realize  that  the  different  methods 
of  reducing  gravity  data  are  based  on  varying  assumptions 
regarding  the  deeper  structure  of  the  earth's  crust,  and  that 
these  assumptions  are  not  subject  to  direct  confirmation. 
Daly  at  one  time  remarked  that  he  did  not  believe  that  any 
of  the  different  methods  of  evaluating  gravity  data  came  very 
near  the  actual  truth.  It  is  reasonable  to  think  that  the  se- 
lection of  assumptions  in  this  field  may  be  influenced  by  a  gen- 
eral belief  in  the  soundness  of  isostasy,  and  that  this  general 
belief  will  lead  to  a  preference  for  those  assumptions  that 
result  in  findings  of  close  isostatic  adjustment.  It  is  perhaps 


382  EARTHS     SHIFTING     CRUST 

on  account  of  this  that  Einstein  regarded  the  theory  of  isos- 
tasy  as  itself  unreasonable  (128).  According  to  our  theory, 
Greenland  possibly  was  deglaciated  during  the  period  of  the 
Wisconsin  icecap  in  North  America,  and  therefore  the  ice- 
cap there  may  be  recent,  and  isostatic  adjustment  poor, 

There  are  a  few  indications  that  the  pressure  of  the  Ant- 
arctic cap  (possibly  reinforced  by  the  Greenland  cap)  has 
already  begun  to  disturb  the  stability  of  the  earth's  crust. 
These  consist  of  recent  seismic  movements. 

In  the  study  of  earthquakes,  specialists  have  distinguished 
between  them  not  only  according  to  their  scale  but  also  by 
a  qualitative  difference  that  appears  to  exist  between  those  of 
minor  and  those  of  major  magnitudes.  Minor  earthquakes, 
which  occur  daily  in  considerable  numbers,  are  considered 
to  be  of  local  origin.  They  are  merely  episodes  in  the  per- 
petual process  of  adjustment  of  strains  in  the  earth's  crust 
arising  from  local  causes. 

Some  of  the  major  earthquakes,  on  the  other  hand,  are 
considered  to  be  qualitatively  different.  Benioff,  for  example, 
suggests  that  these  major  earthquakes  are  not  related  to  local 
causes  of  any  sort,  but  result  from  the  operation  of  what  he 
calls  "world-wide  stress  systems"  (29)— in  other  words,  from 
pressures  applied  to  the  earth's  crust  as  a  whole.  So  far  as  I 
know,  no  geologist  has  advanced  an  explanation  for  these 
world- wide  pressures;  it  seems  quite  possible  that  they  may 
be  related  to  the  icecap  pressure  that,  according  to  our  view, 
has  been  increasingly  exerted  on  the  crust  for  thousands  of 
years. 

Benioff  draws  attention  to  a  fact  that  appears  to  confirm 
this  supposition.  He  points  out  that  in  recent  decades  there 
has  been  an  increasing  tempo  of  major  earthquakes;  they 
appear  to  be  coming  closer  together  and  increasing  in  vio- 
lence. He  cites  especially  the  great  quakes  of  1904,  1924, 
1935>  194°>  and  1950  (29:335).  If  the  Antarctic  icecap  is  the 
major  cause  of  these  quakes,  we  can  understand  the  increase 
in  their  frequency  and  intensity,  which  may  result  either 
from  the  increase  of  the  quantity  of  Antarctic  ice  or  from 


CONCLUSION  383 

the  progressive  weakening  of  the  crust  under  the  repeated 
major  shocks. 

Some  further  confirmation  of  this  suggestion  may  be  found 
in  some  specific  features  of  the  two  greatest  of  the  major 
earthquakes,  those  of  eastern  India  in  1897  and  in  1950.  The 
earlier  of  these  was  a  cataclysm  that  involved  hundreds  of 
thousands  of  square  miles.  The  later  one  was  still  more  vio- 
lent, in  line  with  the  observation  made  by  Benioff.  The 
reader  may  note,  by  glancing  at  the  globe,  that  the  area  in 
which  these  two  quakes  occurred  lies  almost  on  the  meridian 
of  96°  E.  Long.,  which,  it  appears,  is  the  meridian  of  direct 
thrust  of  the  Antarctic  icecap.  According  to  our  theory,  this 
is  the  meridian  along  which  the  gradually  increasing  thrust 
of  the  Antarctic  icecap  has  been  exerted  for  thousands  of 
years.  Let  us  note  the  fact  that  Assam  lies  across  the  equator 
from  the  South  Pole,  and  that  the  thrust  of  the  icecap  would 
tend  to  push  the  area  toward  the  north,  or  poleward,  so  that, 
because  of  the  shape  of  the  earth,  the  result  would  be  com- 
pression of  the  crust  in  that  area.  Now  it  is  not  unreasonable 
to  suppose  that  during  several  millennia  the  pressure  from 
Antarctica  may  have  resulted  in  some  elastic  yielding  of  the 
crust  along  the  meridian,  with  consequent  concentration  of 
compressive  stresses  in  that  area. 

I  cannot  say  that  the  constant  pressure  of  the  Antarctic 
icecap,  operating  on  the  crust  in  the  same  direction  for  ten 
thousand  years  or  more,  and  amounting  to  several  times 
a  million  times  a  million  tons,  definitely  did  cause  some 
yielding  of  the  crust  in  that  direction,  because  I  do  not  know, 
but  I  know  what  would  have  happened  if  there  were  some 
yielding.  Yielding,  at  the  latitude  of  Assam,  to  a  pressure 
directed  from  the  south  would  mean  compression  of  the 
crustal  material  between  lateral  pressures,  because  of  the 
lesser  circumference  of  the  globe  as  one  goes  north.  If  we 
suppose  only  a  very  slight  yielding  of  the  crust  along  the 
meridian  (amounting  to  only  a  few  feet)  the  pressures  so 
produced  would  be  very  great.  An  explosive  situation  would 
exist  because  rock  is  not  very  compressible.  The  forces  would 


384  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

have  to  express  themselves  somehow.  There  would  be  no 
place  to  go  but  up.  A  striking  confirmation  of  this  may  be 
found  in  the  extraordinary  fact  that  Mt.  Everest  and  pos- 
sibly much  of  the  Himalayan  range  appear  to  have  been 
raised  from  100  to  200  feet  by  the  gigantic  earthquake  of 


Now  we  learn  from  Daly  that  gravitationally  the  Hima- 
layas are  already  too  high.  They  are,  or  were  before  the 
earthquake,  over  700  feet  higher  than  they  should  have 
been  for  good  isostatic  adjustment.  Earthquakes  are  generally 
supposed  to  perform  the  function  of  enabling  the  crust  to 
adjust  to  the  force  of  gravity.  If  an  area  stands  too  high, 
earthquakes  occur  during  a  process  of  settling  down  to 
equilibrium.  If  an  area  is  too  low,  earthquakes  may  occur  as 
it  is  rising.  But  what  shall  we  say  about  an  earthquake  that 
finds  an  area  already  too  high,  and  shoves  it  up  further? 
This  earthquake  is  not  behaving  according  to  the  rules.  It 
is  not  tending  to  establish  the  stability  of  the  crust,  but  rather 
is  exposing  the  crust  to  a  situation  of  increased  strain  after 
the  quake. 

But  most  important  of  all,  where  could  the  compressive, 
horizontally  directed  force  have  come  from  to  cause  this 
earthquake?  The  best  reason  for  putting  forth  the  claims  of 
the  Antarctic  icecap  is  that,  so  far,  no  one  has  produced  a 
more  reasonable  suggestion.  It  is  interesting  that  the  editors 
of  Life,  in  their  illustrated  account  of  the  great  quake  in 
Assam,  called  it  "the  most  mysterious  earthquake  of  mod- 
ern times/' 

There  are  a  few  additional  items  that  appear  to  fit  into 
this  picture.  In  the  very  year  in  which  the  Assam  earthquake 
occurred  (1950)  another  great  earthquake  on  the  same  merid- 
ian, but  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  earth,  virtually  destroyed 
the  city  of  Cuzco.  Also  near  the  same  meridian,  in  Mexico, 
we  have  recently  seen  the  rapid  creation  of  the  great  new 
volcanic  mountain  of  Paricutfn,  an  event  that  Campbell 
ascribes  to  the  effects  of  the  increasing  bursting  stress  on  the 
crust  in  the  earth's  equatorial  bulge.  Finally,  it  may  be  worth 


CONCLUSION  385 

while  to  mention  Ewing's  recent  discovery  of  a  world-wide 
system  of  great  submarine  canyons,  along  which  the  crust  is 
technically  active.  Observers  have  suggested  that  these  can- 
yons are  still  widening.  Breen  has  pointed  out  that  their  pat- 
tern (not  yet  fully  established)  is  consistent  with  the  effects 
of  a  force  attempting  to  pull  the  Western  Hemisphere  south- 
ward (44). 

I  am  aware  that  the  items  that  I  have  mentioned  above 
may  all  be  explained  someday  according  to  other  principles, 
and  may  in  fact  have  nothing  to  do  with  centrifugal  effects 
from  Antarctica.  However,  I  feel  that  a  definite  chance  exists 
that  the  phenomena  may  be  related,  and  that  they  may  indi- 
cate that  beginning  of  a  crust  displacement  is  not  remote.  The 
question  therefore  arises  as  to  whether,  in  case  of  another 
displacement,  it  is  possible  to  predict  anything  about  it  in 
detail.  Among  the  questions  to  which  answers  may  be  sought 
are  those  of  the  precise  direction  the  displacement  may  take, 
and  the  total  distance  it  may  cover. 

As  to  the  first  question,  our  theory  offers  us  the  basis  for 
a  reasonable  estimate.  If  our  finding  of  the  location  of  the 
center  of  mass  of  the  Antarctic  icecap  is  correct,  and  if  we 
assume  that  no  other  centrifugal  effects  from  anomalies  in 
the  crust  will  be  acting  to  deflect  the  motion,  we  may  expect 
the  next  displacement  to  be  in  the  direction  of  96°  E.  Long, 
from  the  South  Pole.  This  would  involve  another  southward 
displacement  of  the  Western  Hemisphere,  together  with  an- 
other northward  displacement  of  East  Asia. 

A  guess  as  to  the  magnitude  of  the  next  displacement  re- 
quires the  correct  assessment  of  a  number  of  rather  impon- 
derable factors.  We  should  expect  the  crust  to  continue  to 
move  until  the  Antarctic  icecap  was  largely  destroyed.  This 
might  take  longer  than  it  did  in  the  case  of  the  North  Amer- 
ican icecap,  because  the  Antarctic  icecap  is  larger.  On  the 
other  hand,  it  could  take  less  long,  because  in  the  case  of 
Antarctica  there  is  no  land  available  for  the  rearward  build- 
up of  the  icecap  as  it  moves  into  the  lower  latitudes,  such  as 
seems  to  have  occurred  in  North  America.  Perhaps  we  shall 


386  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

have  to  be  satisfied,  for  the  present,  with  the  guess  that  the 
next  displacement  may  be  of  roughly  the  same  magnitude  as 
the  last  one. 

If  these  guesses  turn  out  to  be  correct,  the  next  North  Pole 
will  be  in  the  vicinity  of  Lake  Baikal,  in  Siberia.  North 
America,  moving  southward  into  the  tropics,  will  subside 
some  hundreds  of  feet  relatively  to  sea  level,  and  the  ocean 
will  occupy  the  river  valleys  and  will  divide  the  continent 
into  several  land  areas.  India  will  move  northward  out  of  the 
tropics,  and  since  there  will  be  no  land  to  the  south  to  pro- 
vide a  refuge  for  the  fauna  and  flora,  we  shall  have  to  expect 
the  extinction  of  many  species  of  animals  and  plants  now 
confined  to  that  country.  Many  other  consequences  may  be 
unpredictable.  The  gradual  climatic  changes  due  to  changing 
latitude  will  be  accompanied  by  numerous  sudden,  violent, 
and  destructive  climatic  changes  due  to  volcanism. 


2.  A  General  Summary 

In  this  book  I  have  presented  a  highly  detailed  mass  of  mate- 
rial, and  I  have  sought  to  relate  it  to  a  single,  essentially 
simple  hypothesis.  It  now  remains  to  summarize  the  evi- 
dence, and  the  argument  for  the  hypothesis. 

We  have  seen  that  the  problem  of  the  geographical  stabil- 
ity of  the  poles  has  long  been  a  vexatious  matter  for  science. 
From  time  to  time  theories  of  polar  shift  have  been  advanced, 
supported  by  large  quantities  of  evidence,  but  the  proposed 
mechanisms  have  been  found  defective,  and  in  consequence 
the  theories  have  been  rejected.  The  failure  of  the  theories 
has  led,  in  the  following  years,  to  neglect  of  the  evidence,  or 
to  its  analysis  in  accordance  with  theories  conforming  to  the 
doctrine  of  the  permanence  of  the  poles.  Although  all  the 
older  theories  of  polar  change,  including  that  of  Wegener, 
have  been  discredited,  the  evidence  in  favor  of  polar  change 
has  constantly  increased.  As  a  consequence,  many  writers  at  the 


CONCLUSION  387 

present  time  are  discussing  polar  shift,  but  none  of  them  has 
as  yet  suggested  an  acceptable  mechanism. 

The  general  evidence  for  displacements  of  the  crust  is  ex- 
ceedingly rich.  In  turn,  the  assumption  of  such  displacements 
serves  to  solve  a  wide  range  of  problems,  such  as  the  causes 
of  ice  ages,  warm  polar  climates,  mountain  building;  it  pro- 
vides a  mechanism  that  may  account  for  changes  in  the  eleva- 
tions of  land  areas  and  in  the  topography  of  the  ocean  floors; 
it  also  provides  a  basis  for  the  resolution  of  conflicts  in  iso- 
static  theory.  For  the  period  of  the  late  Pleistocene,  the  theory 
permits  the  construction  of  a  chronology  of  polar  shifts,  with 
three  successive  tentative  polar  positions  in  Alaska,  Green- 
land, and  Hudson  Bay  preceding  the  present  position  of  the 
pole.  The  evidence  for  the  location  of  the  Hudson  Bay 
region  at  the  pole  during  the  last  North  American  ice  age  is 
overwhelming,  and  this  fact  in  itself  provides  the  principal 
support  for  the  assumption  of  the  earlier  shifts.  The  tempo 
of  change  indicated  for  the  late  Pleistocene  is  reflected  in 
evidence  from  earlier  geological  periods. 

The  theory  is  able  to  explain  not  only  the  general  succes- 
sion of  climatic  changes  in  various  parts  of  the  world  in  the 
late  Pleistocene;  it  can  account  also  for  the  detailed  history 
of  the  last  North  American  icecap.  It  can  explain  the  fluctua- 
tions of  that  icecap,  its  repeated  retreats  and  readvances.  It 
shows  that  the  effects  of  volcanism  were  directly  responsible 
for  the  oscillations.  It  shows  also  that  these  same  effects, 
added  to  the  effects  of  gradual  climatic  change,  were  responsi- 
ble for  the  widespread  extinctions  of  species  at  the  end  of  the 
Pleistocene,  and  from  this  we  may  assume  that  the  same 
cause  was  responsible  for  numerous  extinctions  in  earlier 
geological  periods.  By  providing  a  reasonable  basis  for  the 
assumptions  of  rapid  climatic  change  and  rapid  topograph- 
ical change  (including  the  existence  of  former  continents  and 
land  bridges),  the  theory  provides  solutions  for  many  prob- 
lems in  the  evolution  and  distribution  of  species. 

Our  theory  of  displacement  depends  upon  two  assump- 
tions, and  on  two  only.  One  of  these  is  that  a  continental  ice- 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

cap  is  largely  or  entirely  uncompensated  isostatically.  The 
other  assumption  is  that  at  some  point  below  the  crust  a  weak 
layer  exists  that  will  permit  the  displacement  of  the  crust 
over  it.  The  first  assumption  is  capable  of  verification,  and 
may  even  be  verified  in  the  course  of  the  current  Geophysical 
Year.  This  will  depend,  however,  on  whether  the  new  gravity 
data  that  are  to  be  collected  during  this  year  are  reduced  by 
formulas  based  on  correct  assumptions.  There  is  no  present 
prospect  of  direct  verification  of  the  second  assumption. 
However,  the  body  of  geological  evidence  presented  in  this 
book  provides  very  strong  indirect  support  for  both  these 
assumptions. 

As  to  the  mechanics  of  crust  displacements,  Campbell  has 
provided  the  necessary  constructions.  To  some,  the  simplicity 
of  his  thought  may  be  unnerving,  but  I  feel  assured  that  in 
the  end  this  simplicity  itself  will  be  the  justification  for  re- 
posing wide  confidence  in  this  theory.  For  it  appears  that  no 
recondite  principle  can  vitiate  it.  Who  can  argue  with  for- 
mulas so  simple  that  a  high  school  student  can,  and  usually 
does,  master  them? 

In  addition  to  the  support  provided  by  evidence  from  the 
field,  our  theory  receives  support  from  logic.  It  has  been 
recognized  that  one  characteristic  of  sound  new  theories  is 
the  simplicity  of  their  basic  assumptions,  and  another  is  their 
capacity  to  explain  a  greater  number  of  facts  or  a  greater 
range  of  problems  than  previous  theories.  It  was  the  sim- 
plicity of  this  theory  that  first  aroused  the  interest  of  Einstein, 
in  whose  philosophy  of  science  simplicity  was  a  prime  con- 
sideration. It  appeared  to  him  also  that  it  might  explain  a 
far  greater  number  of  facts  than  were  explainable  by  the 
various  theories  that  have  been  produced  to  explain  the  lead- 
ing problems  of  the  earth  separately. 

I  shall  have  to  admit  that  the  full  development  of  the  im- 
plications of  crust  displacements,  for  all  the  affected  fields, 
has  carried  me  much  further  than  I  originally  expected. 
When  I  resurvey  the  structure  that  has  now  been  erected  on 
the  basis  of  the  simple  basic  theory,  I  feel  exactly  as  Sir  James 


CONCLUSION  389 

Frazer,  author  of  the  Golden  Bough,  felt  at  the  end  of  his 
protracted  labors,  and  I  cannot  do  better  than  conclude  this 
volume  with  his  words: 

Now  that  the  theory,  which  necessarily  presented  itself  to  me  at 
first  in  outline,  has  been  worked  out  in  detail,  I  cannot  but  feel  that 
in  some  places  I  may  have  pushed  it  too  far.  If  this  should  prove  to 
have  been  the  case,  I  will  readily  acknowledge  and  retract  my  error 
as  soon  as  it  is  brought  home  to  me.  Meanwhile,  my  essay  may  serve 
its  purpose  as  a  first  attempt  to  solve  a  difficult  problem,  and  to  bring 
a  variety  of  scattered  facts  into  some  sort  of  order  and  system.  (The 
Magic  Art) 


"But  when  you  have  the  truth,  everything  fits. 
I  think  that's  the  main  test  of  truth.  It  fits,  it 
makes  a  harmony,  one  pattern  all  through.  .  .  ." 

E.  R.  Punshon,  Information  Received 
(Penguin  Books,  1955) 


APPENDIX 


Letters  from  Albert  Einstein  and  George  Sarton 

A.  Einstein 
112  Mercer  Street 
Princeton,  N.  J. 

November  24,  1952 
Mr.  Charles  Hapgood 
2  Allerton  Street 
Provincetown,  Mass. 

Dear  Sir: 

I  have  read  already  some  years  ago  in  a  popular  article  about  the 
idea  that  excentric  masses  of  ice,  accumulated  near  a  pole,  could  pro- 
duce from  time  to  time  considerable  dislocations  of  the  floating  rigid 
crust  of  the  earth.  I  have  never  occupied  myself  with  this  problem  but 
my  impression  is  that  a  careful  study  of  this  hypothesis  is  really  de- 
sirable. 

I  think  that  our  factual  knowledge  of  the  underlying  facts  is  at  pres- 
ent not  precise  enough  for  a  reliable  answer  based  exclusively  on 
calculations.  Knowledge  of  geological  and  paleontological  facts  may  be 
of  decisive  importance  in  the  matter.  In  any  case,  it  would  not  be  justi- 
fied to  discard  the  idea  a  priori  as  adventurous. 

The  question  whether  high  pressure  may  not  be  able  to  produce 
fusion  of  nuclei  is  also  quite  justified.  It  is  not  known  to  me  if  a  quanti- 
tative theory  has  been  worked  out  by  astrophysicists.  The  action  of 
pressure  would  not  be  a  static  effect  as  classical  mechanics  would  sug- 
gest, but  a  kinetic  effect  corresponding  not  to  temperature  but  to  de- 
generacy of  gases  of  high  density.  You  should  correspond  about  this 
with  an  astrophysicist  experienced  in  quantum  theory,  f.i.  Dr.  M. 
Schwarzschild  at  the  Princeton  University  Observatory. 

Sincerely  yours, 
(Signed)    A.  Einstein 


APPENDIX 

Princeton, 
May  8,  1953 
Dear  Mr.  Hapgood, 

I  thank  you  very  much  for  the  manuscript  that  you  sent  me  on  May 
3rd.  I  find  your  arguments  very  impressive  and  have  the  impression  that 
your  hypothesis  is  correct.  One  can  hardly  doubt  that  significant  shifts 
of  the  crust  of  the  earth  have  taken  place  repeatedly  and  within  a  short 
time.  The  empirical  material  you  have  compiled  would  hardly  permit 
another  interpretation. 

It  is  certainly  true,  too,  that  ice  is  continually  deposited  in  the  polar 
regions.  These  deposits  must  lead  to  instability  of  the  crust  when  it  is 
sufficiently  strong  not  to  constantly  keep  in  balance  by  the  adjustment 
of  the  polar  regions. 

The  thickness  of  the  icecap  at  the  polar  regions  must,  if  this  is  the 
case,  constantly  increase,  at  least  where  a  foundation  of  rock  is  present. 
One  should  be  able  to  estimate  empirically  the  annual  increase  of  the 
polar  icecaps.  If  there  exists  at  least  in  one  part  of  the  polar  regions  a 
rock  foundation  for  the  icecap,  one  should  be  able  to  calculate  how 
much  tune  was  needed  to  deposit  the  whole  of  the  icecap.  The  amount 
of  the  ice  that  flowed  off  should  be  negligible  in  this  calculation.  In  this 
way  one  could  almost  prove  your  hypothesis. 

Another  striking  circumstance  appears  in  connection  with  the  ellip- 
ticity  of  the  meridians.  If  according  to  your  hypothesis  an  approximate 
folding  of  the  meridional  volume  takes  place,  that  is,  folding  of  a 
meridional  volume  within  an  equatorial  volume  (which  is  considerably 
larger),  this  event  will  have  to  be  accompanied  by  a  fracture  of  the  hard 
crust  of  the  earth.  This  also  fits  in  very  well  with  the  existing  phe- 
nomena of  the  volcanic  coastal  regions  with  their  mainly  north-south 
extension  and  the  narrowness  in  the  east-west  direction.  Without  your 
hypothesis  one  could  hardly  find  a  halfway  reasonable  explanation  for 
these  weak  spots  of  the  present-day  crust  of  the  earth. 

Excuse  me  for  not  writing  in  English.  My  secretary  has  been  away 
for  some  time,  and  "spelling"  makes  frightful  difficulties  for  me. 

With  sincere  respect  and  kind  regards, 

Yours, 

(Signed)    A.  Einstein 
(Translated  by  Use  Politzer) 


392  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

5  Channing  Place, 
Cambridge,  Mass., 
Tuesday  '55  06.07 
Dear  Mr.  Hapgood, 

I  have  read  your  lecture  at  the  AMNH,  the  discussion  which  followed 
and  the  Einstein  documents,  with  deep  interest.  I  really  think  that  you 
are  on  the  right  track  but  have  no  authority  to  express  a  more  definite 
opinion.  It  is  clear  that  the  only  opinions  which  matter  are  those  which 
are  the  results  of  independent  studies  by  competent  specialists. 

The  combination  of  ideas  is  so  new  that  the  history  of  science  has 
nothing  to  contribute  to  its  understanding.  The  fact  that  there  have 
been  earlier  theories  like  those  of  Wegener,  Kreichgauer  and  Vening 
Meinesz  simply  proves  that  some  meteorologic  and  geologic  problems 
had  to  be  solved,  and  exercised  the  minds  of  men  of  science.  What  you 
need  is  not  historical  facts,  but  physical  ones,  and  mathematical  de- 
velopments. 

With  every  good  wish 

(Signed) 

George  Sarton 


GLOSSARY 

ANOMALY,  Positive:  An  excess  of  mass  at  a  point  on  the  crust,  as  com- 
pared with  the  average  distribution  of  mass. 

Negative:  A  similar  but  opposite  condition,  in  which  there  is  a 

local  deficiency  of  mass. 
ANTICLINE:  An  archlike  folding  of  rocks  or  rock  strata  so  that  the 

lower  beds  or  strata  are  enclosed  in  the  upper. 
ARCHAEOCYATHIDAE:  A  fossil  sponge,  at  one  time  supposed  to  be 

a  fossil  coral. 
ASTHENOSPHERE:  A  layer  of  material  below  the  crust;  assumed  to 

be  weak  because  of  heat  and  pressure. 
BASEMENT  ROCKS:  Rocks  of  great  obscurity  and  complexity  lying 

beneath  the  upper  rock  layers;  thus,  the  lowermost  rocks  of  the 

known  series. 
CENTRIFUGAL  FORCE:  The  force  tending  to  throw  a  body  away 

from  the  center,  in  a  straight-line  direction  of  flight. 
DECIDUOUS  TREES:   Trees  having  seasonally  falling  foliage  (oak, 

elm,  etc.)  as  contrasted  with  evergreens,  having  constantly  renewed 

foliage  (pine,  etc.). 
DIASTROPHISM:  The  process,  or  processes,  by  which  major  features 

of  the  crust  are  formed  through  deformation,  such  as  faults,  plateaus, 

etc. 

ECOLOGICAL:  Pertaining  to  the  mutual  relationship  between  organ- 
isms and  their  environment.  An  ecology  is  the  place-relationship  of 

life  forms  in  their  environment. 
EPEIROGENESIS  (EPEIROGENY):  A  grander  form  of  diastrophism, 

forming  the  broader  features  of  crustal  relief,  such  as  continents, 

ocean  beds,  etc. 

EPICONTINENTAL:  Pertaining  to  regions  along  the  continental  shelf. 
EUSTATIC:  Pertaining  to  a  land  area  which  has  not  undergone  eleva- 
tion or  depression. 
GEOID:  The  figure  of  the  earth  (an  oblate  sphere)  with  the  average  sea 

level  conceived  of  as  extending  throughout  the  continents. 
GEOSYNCLINE:  A  great  downward  flexing  of  the  crust. 
GRAVITY,  Center  of:  An  imaginary  point  at  which,  for  reasons  of 

computation,  the  entire  weight  or  mass  of  a  body  is  imagined  to  be 

concentrated. 
HORSE  LATITUDES:  A  belt  in  the  neighborhood  of  30°  N.  or  S.  Lat, 

characterized  by  high  pressure,  calms,  and  baffling  winds. 


394  EARTH'S   SHIFTING    CRUST 

HYDROSTATIC:  Pertaining  to  pressure  and  equilibrium  of  liquids. 

IGNEOUS  ROCKS:  Rocks  which  have  cooled  and  solidified  from  a 
molten  state. 

INSOLATION:  Solar  radiation  received  by  the  earth.  The  insolation 
curve  represents  the  combined  effects  on  mean  world-wide  tempera- 
tures of  various  astronomical  factors,  such  as  precession  and  varia- 
tions of  the  orbit  of  the  earth  about  the  sun. 

ISOSTASY:  The  definition  is  discussed  in  the  text:  Chapter  VI. 

LITHOSPHERE:  The  outer  shell  of  the  planet.  It  is  composed  of  rocks 
and  the  products  derived  from  them  by  erosion,  etc.,  such  as  gravels, 
soils,  and  the  like.  The  crystalline,  solid  lithosphere  is  assumed  to  be 
between  20  and  40  miles  thick.  (Also  called  crust.) 

LOAD,  Negative:  A  deficiency  of  matter  at  a  given  point  on  the  crust; 
considered  negative  because  it  results  in  a  pressure  from  within,  as 
a  result  of  the  tendency  to  achieve  hydrostatic  balance. 
Positive:  A  local  excess  of  mass. 

MAGMA:  Molten  rock  material  within  the  earth.  When  cooled  and 
crystallized  into  solid  form  it  yields  the  so-called  igneous  rocks  (q.v.). 

MASS:  A  measure  of  the  amount  of  matter  in  a  body. 

MASS,  Center  of:  Point  at  which  the  mass  is  assumed  to  be  concen- 
trated; for  computational  purposes. 

METAMORPHIC:  Altered;  applied  to  rocks  or  rock  strata  that  have 
been  physically  changed  by  heat  or  other  means. 

MILLIGAL:  A  thickness  of  ten  meters  of  granite;  the  effects  (gravi- 
tational) produced  by  such  mass. 

MUTATION:  A  sudden  variation  in  the  characteristics  of  a  life  form 
as  compared  to  those  of  its  progenitors. 

NEBULAR  THEORY:  A  theory  of  the  origin  of  the  solar  system,  ac- 
cording to  which  a  gaseous  nebula  coalesced  and  cooled  to  form 
compacted  centers  which  then  further  contracted  to  form  the 
planets. 

OOZE:  A  soft  deep-sea  deposit  composed  of  shells,  debris,  meteoric 
dust,  etc.  Argillaceous  ooze  is  a  clayey  type. 

PLANETESIMAL:  A  small,  solid  planetary  body  having  an  individual 
orbit  about  the  sun. 

PLANETESIMAL  HYPOTHESIS:  A  theory  of  the  origin  of  the  solar 
system  supposing  that  the  planets  were  formed  by  collision  and 
coalescence  of  planetesimals  and  thus  have  never  been  wholly 
molten. 

PLICATION:  Folding  into  layers  or  strata. 

PRECESSION:  The  wobbling  of  the  axis  of  the  earth,  making  the  pole 
describe  a  circle  as  the  planet  spins. 

RADIATION,  Adaptive:  The  production  of  a  diversified  fauna  as  the 
result  of  the  availability  of  new  ecological  spaces.  New  faunas  re- 


GLOSSARY  395 

suit  from  the  adaptation  of  an  original  stock  to  the  new  environ- 
mental opportunities  for  living  space. 

SIAL:  Silicon-aluminum  rocks. 

SIMA:  Silicon-magnesium  rocks. 

STRANDLINE:  A  line  marking  a  fossil  seashore. 

STRATIGRAPHIC:  Pertaining  to  the  arrangement  of  rock  strata. 

TECTONIC:  Pertaining  to  rock  structures  resulting  from  deformation 
of  the  crust. 

TURBIDITY  CURRENTS:  Submarine  currents  caused  by  slumping 
of  deposits  along  continental  margins.  These  currents  carry  sedi- 
ments with  them. 

UNCOMPENSATED  WEIGHT:  The  weight  of  a  crustal  formation  not 
isostatically  adjusted.  It  thus  constitutes  a  positive  anomaly  (q.v.). 

UNIAXIAL:  The  condition  of  having  only  one  axis,  as  a  sphere. 

VARVES:  Annual  deposits  of  sediment.  These  can  be  counted  to  de- 
termine annual  shorelines  of  old  lakes. 

VIRENZPERIOD:  A  period  in  the  history  of  a  life  form  in  which  it  ex- 
periences an  explosive  evolution  and  proliferation. 

VISCOSITY:  The  quality  of  being  able  to  yield  to  stress  or  of  being 
able  to  flow;  the  measure  of  such  a  property. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

The  following  alphabetical  list  serves  both  as  bibliography  and  as  iden- 
tification for  specific  sources  cited  in  the  text.  (See  footnote,  p.  10.) 

1.  Almond,  M.,  Clegg,  J.  A.,  and  Jaeger,  J.  C.,  "Rock  Magnetism." 
Philosophical  Magazine,  Ser.  8,  v.  i,  pp.  77 iff  (I9bfy- 

2.  Anderson,  E.  C.,  Levi,  H.,  and  Tauber,  H.,  "Copenhagen  Natural 
Radiocarbon  Measurements  I."  Science,  118:9  (1953). 

3.  Anderson,  R.  J.,  "The  Anatomy  of  the  Indian  Elephant/'  Journal 
of  Anatomy  and  Physiology,  27:491-94  (1883). 

4.  Anderson,   W.,   "Quaternary  Sea-Levels  in   the   Northern   Hemi- 
sphere/' Geological  Magazine,  76:489-93  (Nov.,  1939). 

5.  Antevs,  Ernst,  "The  Climatological  Significance  of  Annual  Rings 
in   Fossil   Woods/1   American  Journal  of  Science,   (5)   9:296-302 

0925)' 

6.  Antevs,  Ernst,  The  Last  Glaciation  with  Special  Reference  to  the 
Ice  Retreat  in  Northeastern  North  America.  New  York,  The  Amer- 
ican Geographical  Society,  1928. 

7.  Antevs,  Ernst,  "Modes  of  Retreat  of  the  Pleistocene  Ice  Sheets/' 
Journal  of  Geology,  47:503-08  (July,  1939). 

8.  Antevs,  Ernst,  "Geochronology  of  the  Deglacial  and  Neothermal 
Ages."  Journal  of  Geology,  61:195-230  (May,  1953). 

9.  Antevs,  Ernst,  "Geochronology  of  the  Deglacial  and  Neothermal 
Ages.  A  Reply."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  62,  No.  5  (Sept.,  1954). 

10.  Antevs,  Ernest,  "Varve  and  Radiocarbon  Chronologies  Appraised 
by  Pollen  Data."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  63,  No.  5  (Sept.,  1955). 

11.  Anthony,  Harold,  "Nature's  Deep  Freeze."  Science  Digest  (Jan., 
1950).  (Condensed  from  Natural  History,  Sept.,  1949.) 

12.  Army  Observer's  Report  of  Operation  Highjump,  Task  'Force  68, 
United  States  Navy,  1947.  (Unclassified.) 

13.  Arrhenius,  Gustav.  See  Pettersson,  Hans. 

i3a.  Arrhenius,  Gustav,  "Sediment  Cores  from  the  East  Pacific/'  Reporti 
of  the  Swedish  Deep-Sea  Expedition,  v.  5,  fasc.  i  (1952). 

14.  Arrhenius,  G.,  Kjellberg,  G.,  and  Libby,  W.  F.,  "Age  Determination 
of  Pacific  Chalk  Ooze  by  Radiocarbon  and  Titanium  Content." 
Tellus,  v.  3,  No.  4  (Nov.,  1951). 

15.  Ashley,  George  H.,  General  Information  on  Coal  Mineral  Resource 
Report  No.  6,  Part  I,  Geological  Survey  of  Pennsylvania.  1928. 

16.  Australian  Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science,  Reports, 
y.  10  (1904). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  397 

17.  Bailey,  Thomas  L.,  "Late  Pleistocene  Coast  Range  Orogenesis  in 
Southern  California."  Abstracts,  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society, 
v.  52,  Pt.  2  (2),  pp.  1888-89  (1941). 

18.  Bain,  George  W.,  "Mapping  the  Climatic  Zones  of  the  Geologic 
Past."  Yale  Scientific  Magazine,  v.  xxvii,  No.  5  (Feb.,  1953)  (reprint). 

19.  Bain,  George  W.,  personal  communication. 

20.  Ball,  Sir  Robert,  The  Cause  of  an  Ice  Age.  New  York,  Appleton, 
1892. 

21.  Bandy,  O.  L.,  "Paleotemperatures  of  Pacific  Bottom  Waters  and 
Multiple  Hypotheses."  Science ,  v.  123,  No.  3194  (March  16,  1956). 

22.  Barley,  Alfred,   The  Drayson  Problem.  Exeter,  England,  Pollard, 
1922. 

23.  Barley,  Alfred,  The  Ice  Ages.  Lewes,  Sussex,  England,  Baxter,  1927. 

24.  Barnes,  Joseph,  personal  conference. 

25.  Bell,  Robert,  "On  the  Occurrence  of  Mammoth  and  Mastodon  Re- 
mains around  Hudson  Bay."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of 
America,  9:369-90  (June  22,  1898). 

26.  Benedict,  Francis  G.,  The  Physiology  of  the  Elephant.  Washington, 
Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington,  1936. 

27.  Benedikt,  Elliot  T.,  "A  Method  of  Determination  of  the  Direction 
of  the  Magnetic  Field  of  the  Earth  in  Geological  Epochs."  Amer- 
ican Journal  of  Science,  v.  241,  No.  2  (Feb.,  1943). 

28.  Benfield,  A.  E.,  "The  Earth's  Heat."  Scientific  American,  v.  183, 
No.  6  (Dec.,  1950). 

29.  Benioff,  H.,  "Global  Strain  Accumulation  and  Release  as  Revealed 
by  Great  Earthquakes."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  Amer- 
ica, v.  62,  No.  4  (April,  1951). 

30.  Benioff,  H.,  Interview  by  Associated  Press,  Daytona  Beach  Evening 
News,  March  6,  1952. 

31.  Bergquist,  N.  O.,  The  Moon  Puzzle.  A  Revised  Classical  Theory 
Correlating   the    Origin   of   the  Moon   with   Many   Problems  in 
Natural  Science.  Copenhagen,  Denmark,  Grafisk  Forlag,  1954. 

32.  Berry,   Edward   Wilbur,    The  Past   Climate   of   the   North   Polar 
Region.  Washington,  The  Smithsonian  Institution,  1930. 

33.  Birch,  F.,  "Elasticity  of  Igneous  Rocks  at  High  Temperatures  and 
Pressures."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  54:263- 
86  (1943). 

34.  Birch,  F.,  and  Bancroft,  D.,  "The  Elasticity  of  Glass  at  High  Tem- 
peratures and  the  Vitreous  Basalt  Substratum."  American  Journal 
of  Science,  240:457-90  (1942). 

35.  Birch,  F.,  and  Bancroft,  D.,  "New  Measurements  of  the  Rigidity 

of  Rocks  at  High  Pressure."  Journal  of  Geology,  48:752-66  (1940). 

36.  Black,   Davidson,   "Paleogeography   and  Polar  Shift."   Reprinted 


398  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

from  the  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  China,  v.  X,  Peiping, 


37.  Blackett,  P.  M.  S.,  Lectures  on  Rock  Magnetism.  New  York,  Inter- 
science  Publications,  1956. 

38.  Blanchard,  Jacques,  L'Hypothese  du  deplacement  des  poles  et  la 
chronologic  du  quaternaire.  Paris,  Editions  Universitaires,  1942. 

39.  Bliss,  W.  L.,  "Radiocarbon  Contamination."  American  Antiquity, 
v.  xvii,  No.  3  (Jan.,  1952). 

40.  Boas,  Franz,  ed.,  General  Anthropology.  Boston,  Heath,  1938. 

41.  Bradley,  W.  H.,  et  al.,  Professional  Papers  136A,  B.  United  States 
Geological  Survey,  1940. 

42.  Bradley,  W.  H.,  The  Varves  and  Climate  of  the  Green  River  Epoch. 
Professional  Paper  158.  United  States  Geological  Survey. 

43.  Bramlette,  G.,  and  Bradley,  W.  H.,  Geology  and  Biology  of  North 
Atlantic  Deep-Sea  Cores.   Professional  Paper   196.  United  States 
Geological  Survey. 

Brannon,  H.  R.,  et  al.  See  "Humble  Oil  Radiocarbon  Dates  I." 

44.  Breen,  Walter,  personal  communication. 

45.  Brewster,  E.  T.,  This  Puzzling  Planet.  New  York,  Bobbs,  1928. 

46.  Brice,  J.  C.,  personal  communication. 

47.  Bridgman,  P.  W.,  "Effects  of  High  Shearing  Stress  Combined  with 
High  Hydrostatic  Pressure."  Physical  Review,  48:825-47  (1935). 

48.  Bridgman,  P.  W.,  "Some  Implications  for  Geophysics  of  High  Pres- 
sure Phenomena."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America, 


49.  Bridgman,  P.  W.,  Studies  in  Large  Plastic  Flow  and  Fracture.  New 
York,  McGraw-Hill,  1952. 

50.  Bridgman,  P.  W.,  personal  conference. 

51.  Bridgman,  P.  W.,  personal  communication. 

52.  Brooks,  C.  E.  P.,  Climate  Through  the  Ages.  New  York,  McGraw- 
Hill,  1949. 

53.  Brouwer,  Dirk,  personal  communication. 

54.  Brown,   Hugh  Auchincloss,  Popular  Awakening   Concerning   the 
Impending  Flood.  Lithographed  manuscript  copy  of  a  proposed 
illustrated  book,  copyright   1948,  with  corrections  and  additions 
inserted  by  the  author  to  1951.  Ann  Arbor,  Michigan,  Edwards, 
1948. 

55.  Brown,  J.  MacMillan,  The  Riddle  of  the  Pacific.  London,  Fisher 
Unwin,  1925. 

56.  Bruckner,  Eduard,  "Die  Schneegrenze  in  der  Antarctis."  Zeitschrift 
fur  Gletscherkunde,  7:276-79  (1913). 

57.  Bucher,  Walter  H.,  "The  Crust  of  the  Earth."  Scientific  American 
(May,  1950). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  399 

58.  Bucher,  Walter  H.,  The  Deformation  of  the  Earth's  Crust.  Prince- 
ton, University  Press,  1933. 

59.  Bullard,  E.  C.,  Review  of  Jeffreys'  s  The  Earth,  %d  ed.  Science,  v. 
119,  No.  3081  (Jan.  15,  1954). 

60.  Burtt,  E.  A.,  The  Metaphysical  Foundations  of  Modern  Science,  rev. 
ed.  Garden  City,  Doubleday,  1954. 

61.  Byrd,  Admiral  Richard  E.,  "Exploring  the  Ice  Age  in  Antarctica." 
National  Geographic  Magazine,  v.  LXVIII,  No.  4  (Oct.,  1935). 

62.  Byrd,    Admiral    Richard    E.,    "Our    Navy    Explores    Antarctica." 
National  Geographic  Magazine,  v.  XCII,  No.  4  (Oct.,  1947). 

63.  Cain,  S.  A.,  Foundations  of  Plant  Geography.  New  York,  Harper, 
1944. 

64.  de  Camp,  L.  Sprague,  Lost  Continents.  New  York,  Gnome,  1954. 

65.  Campbell,  James  H.,  personal  conference. 

66.  Campbell,  James  H.,  personal  communication. 

67.  Campbell,  J.  H.,  and  Hapgood,  C.  H.,  "Effect  of  Polar  Ice  on  the 
Crust  of  the  Earth."   Yale  Scientific  Magazine,  v.  XXXI,  No.    i 
(Oct.,  1956). 

68.  Carsola,  Alfred  J.,  "Bathymetry  of  the  Arctic  Ocean."  Journal  of 
Geology,  v.  63,  No.  3,  pp.  274-78  (May,  1955). 

69.  Caster,  K.  E.,  and  Mendes,  J.  C.,  "Geological  Comparison  of  South 
America  with  South  Africa  after  Twenty  Years."  Abstract,  Bulletin 
of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  58:1173  (1947). 

70.  Challinor,  J.,  "Remarkable  Example  of  Superficial  Folding  Due  to 
Glacial  Drag."  Geological  Magazine,  84:270-72  (Sept.,  1947). 

71.  Chamberlin,  R.  T.,  "Origin  and  History  of  the  Earth."  In  Moulton, 
F.  R.,  ed.,  The  World  and  Man  as  Science  Sees  Them.  Garden 
City,  Doubleday,  1937. 

72.  Chancy,  Ralph  W.,  "Tertiary  Forests  and  Continental  History." 
Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  v.  51,  No.  3  (March 
i,  1940). 

73.  Chaney,  R.  W.,  "The  Ecological  Composition  of  the  Eagle  Creek 
Flora."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  v.  31,  No.  i 
(March  31,  1920). 

74.  Chapin,  Henry,  and  Smith,  Walton,  The  Ocean  River.  New  York, 
Scribner's,  1952. 

75.  Charlesworth,  J.  K.,  "The  Ice  Age  and  the  Future  of  Man."  Science 
Progress  (London),  XLI:i6i  (Jan.,  1953). 

76.  "Chicago  Radiocarbon  Dates."  Science,  v.   113,  No.  2927  (Feb.  2, 


76a,  "Chicago  Radiocarbon  Dates  II."  Science,  v.  114,  No.  2960  (Sept. 

21,  1951). 
77.    "Chicago  Radiocarbon  Dates  III."  Science,  v.  116,  No.  3025  (Dec. 

*9>  195*)- 


4-oo  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

78.  ''Chicago  Radiocarbon  Dates  IV."  Science,  v.  119,  No.  3083  (Jan. 

*9>  1954)- 

79.  "Chicago  Radiocarbon  Dates  V."  Science,  v.  120,  No.  3123  (Nov.  5, 

1954). 

80.  Clegg,  J.  A.,  "Rock  Magnetism,"  Nature,  178:1085  (Nov.  17,  1956). 

81.  Clegg,  J.  A.,  Almond,  Mary,  and  Stubbs,  P.  H.  S.,  "Remanent  Mag- 
netism  of    Some   Sedimentary    Rocks    in    Britain."    Philosophical 
Magazine,  45:365  (June,  1954). 

82.  Clegg,  J.  A.,  Deutsch,  E.  R.,  and  Griffiths,  D.  H.,  "Magnetism  of 
the  Deccan  Trap."  Philosophical  Magazine,  Ser.  8,  v.  i,  pp.  4193 


83.  Clisby,  Katharyn  H.,  personal  communication. 

84.  Clisby,  Katharyn  H.,  and  Sears,  Paul  B.,  "The  San  Augustin  Plains- 
Pleistocene  Climatic  Changes."  Science,  v.  124,  No..  3221  (Sept.  21, 


85.  Cloos,  Hans,  Conversation  with  the  Earth.  New  York,  Knopf,  1953. 

86.  Colbert,  Edwin  H.,  "The  Pleistocene  Mammals  of  North  America 
and  Their  Relations  to  Eurasian  Forms."  In  Early  Man,  symposium 
edited  by  George  G.   MacCurdy,  published  for  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia,  Lippincott,  1937. 

87.  Coleman,  A.  P.,  Ice  Ages  Recent  and  Ancient.  New  York,  Mac- 
millan,  1929. 

87a.  Columbia  Research  News,  v.  VII,  No.  2  (Feb.,  1957). 

88.  Conant,  James  B.,   On   Understanding  Science.  New  York,  New 
American  Library,  1951. 

89.  "Copenhagen  Natural  Radiocarbon  Measurements  II."  Science,  v. 
124,  No.  3227  (Nov.  2,  1956). 

90.  Crane,  H.  R.,  "Antiquity  of  the  Sandia  Culture.  Carbon  14  Meas- 
urements." Science,  v.  122,  No.  3172  (Oct.  14,  1955). 

91.  Croll,  James,  Climate  and  Time.  London,  Daldy,  Isbister,   1875. 
Crust  of  the  Earth,  a  Symposium  on  the.  See  Poldervaart,  ed. 

92.  Cushman,  Joseph  A.,  "Study  of  the  Foraminifera  Contained  in 
Cores  from  the  Bartlett  Deep."  American  Journal  of  Science,  v.  239, 
No.  2,  pp.  128-47. 

93.  Daly,  R.  A.,  The  Changing  World  of  the  Ice  Age.  New  Haven,  Yale, 

1934- 

94.  Daly,  R.  A.,  "Pleistocene  Glaciation  and  the  Coral  Reef  Problem." 
American  Journal  of  Science,  Ser.  4,  v.  30,  pp.  297-308. 

95.  Daly,  R.  A.,  "Earth  Crust  Slides  on  a  Great  Sea  of  Glass."  Science 
News  Letter  (May  9,  1925). 

96.  Daly,  R.  A.,  The  Daly  Volume  of  the  American  Journal  of  Science. 
American  Journal  of  Science,  v.  242A  (1945). 

97.  Daly,  R.  A.,  The  Strength  and  Structure  of  the  Earth,  New  York, 
Prentice  Hall,  1940. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  4O1 

98.  Daly,  R.  A.,  Our  Mobile  Earth.  New  York  and  London,  Scribner's, 
1926. 

99.  Daly,  R.  A.,  "A  Recent  World  Wide  Sinking  of  Ocean  Level." 
Geological  Magazine,  52:246-61  (1920). 

100.  Daly,  R.  A.,  personal  conference. 

101.  Dana's  Manual  of  Mineralogy,  i$th  ed.,  rev.  by  Cornelius  S.  Hurl- 
but,  Jr.  New  York,  Wiley,  1952. 

102.  Dana,  James  D.,  Corals  and  Coral  Islands.  New  York,  Dodd,  Mead, 
1872. 

103.  Darwin,  Charles,  The  Origin  of  Species.  (Reprinted  from  the  6th 
London  edition.)  New  York,  Burt,  n.d. 

104.  Darwin,  Charles,  Journal  of  Research.  New  York,  American  Home 
Library,  1902. 

105.  Darwin,  George  H.,  "On  the  Influence  of  Geological  Changes  on 
the  Earth's  Axis  of  Rotation."  Philosophical  Transactions  of  the 
Royal  Society,  v.  167,  Pt.  i. 

106.  David,  T.  W.  E.,  "Antarctica  and  Some  of  Its  Problems."  Geo- 
graphical Journal,  43:605-30  (1914). 

107.  Davies,  O.,  "African  Pluvials  and  European  Glaciations."  Nature, 
v.  178,  No.  4536  (Oct.  6,  1956). 

io7a.  Deevey,   E.  S.,   and  Flint,  R.   F.,   "Postglacial  Hypsithermal   In- 
terval." Science,  v.  125,  No.  3240  (Feb.  i,  1957). 

108.  De  Geer,  Ebba  Hult,  "Geochronology  of  the  Deglacial  and  Neo- 
thermal  Ages:  A  Discussion."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  62,  No.  5 
(Sept.,  1954). 

109.  De  Geer,  Gerard  Jakob,  "On  the  Solar  Curve  as  Dating  the  Ice 
Age,  the  New  York  Moraine  and  Niagara  Falls  through  the  Swed- 
ish Time  Scale."  Geografiska  Annaler  (1926). 

no.    De  Geer,  Gerard,  "Compte  rendu."  Geological  Congress,  1910. 

111.  Dennis,  Clifford  E.,  "Experiments  in  Planetary  Deformation  of 
the  Earth."  Pan-American  Geologist,  55:241-58  (1931). 

112.  Dietz,  Robert  S.,  Technical  Report  ONRL-j-tf,  Office  of  Naval 
Research,  London,  Jan.  10,  1957.  (An  informal  report  of  the  con- 
ference on  rock  magnetism  held  in  London  in  December,  1957. 
The  official  report,  to  appear  in  Advances  in  Physics  sometime 
during  1957,  not  being  at  hand,  I  have  found  it  necessary  to  cite 
this  informal  report  in  one  or  two  places,  despite  the  official  re- 
quest that  it  "not  be  considered  a  part  of  the  scientific  literature.") 

113.  Digby,  Bassett,  The  Mammoth  and  Mammoth-Hunting  Grounds 
in  Northeast  Siberia.  New  York,  Appleton,  1926. 

114.  Dillon,  Lawrence  S.,  "Wisconsin  Climate  and  Life  Zones  in  North 
America."  Science,  v.  123,  No.  3188  (Feb.  2,  1956). 

115.  Dodson,  Edward  O.,  A  Textbook  of  Evolution.  Philadelphia  and 
London,  Saunders,  1952. 


4O2  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

116.  Dorf,   E.,    "Plants   and   the   Geologic   Time   Scale."    See    Polder- 
vaart,  ed. 

117.  Drayson,  A.  W.,  The  Last  Glacial  Period  in  Geology,  1873.  Thirty 
Thousand  Years  of  the  Earth's  Past  History,   1888.    Untrodden 
Ground  in  Astronomy  and  Geology,  1890. 

118.  Dreimanis,  Alexis,  "Stratigraphy  of  the  Wisconsin  Glacial  Stage 
along  the  Northwestern  Shore  of  Lake  Erie/'  Science,  v.  126,  No. 
3265  (July  26,  1957). 

119.  du  Noiiy,  Pierre  Lecomte,  Human  Destiny.  New  York,  Longmans 
Green,  1947. 

120.  Du  Toit,  A.  L.,  A  Geological  Comparison  of  South  America  with 
South  Africa.  Washington,  Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington, 
Publication  No.  381,  1927. 

121.  Du  Toit,  A.  L.,  "Further  Remarks  on  Continental  Drift."  Amer- 
ican Journal  of  Science,  243:404-08  (1945). 

122.  Dutton,  Clarence,  "On  Some  of  the  Greater  Problems  of  Physical 
Geology."  (Chapter  XIII  of  Bulletin  78,  Physics  of  the  Earth,  of 
the  National  Research  Council,  1931.) 

123.  Eardley,  Armand  J.,   "The   Cause   of  Mountain   Formation:    an 
Enigma."  The  American  Scientist,  v.  45,  No.  3  (June,  1957). 

124.  Eddington,  A.  E.,  "The  Borderland  of  Astronomy  and  Geology." 
Smithsonian  Reports,  1923. 

125.  Edmondson,    Charles    Howard,    "Growth    of   Hawaiian    Corals." 
Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum  Bulletin  58,  Honolulu,  published  by 
the  Museum,  1929. 

126.  Einarsson,  T.,  and  Sigurgeirsson,  T.,  "Rock  Magnetism  in  Ice- 
land." Nature,  v.  175,  No.  892  (1955)* 

127.  Einstein,  Albert,   "On  the  Generalized  Theory  of  Gravitation." 
Scientific  American,  v.  182,  No.  4  (April,  1950). 

128.  Einstein,  Albert,  personal  communication. 

129.  Einstein,  Albert,  conference. 

130.  Ekman,  Sven,  Zoogeography  of  the  Sea.  London,  Sidgwick  and 
Jackson,  1953. 

131.  Emiliani,  Cesare,  "Temperatures  of  Pacific  Bottom  Waters  and 
Polar  Superficial  Waters  during  the  Tertiary."  Science,  v.  119,  No. 
3103  (June  19,  1954). 

132.  Emiliani,  Cesare,  "Pleistocene  Temperatures."  Journal  of  Geology, 
v.  63,  No.  6,  pp.  538-78  (Nov.,  1955). 

133.  Emiliani,    Cesare,    "On    Paleotemperatures    of    Pacific    Bottom 
Waters."  Science,  v.  123,  No.  3194  (March  16,  1956). 

134.  Emiliani,  Cesare,  "Note  on  the  Absolute  Chronology  of  Human 
Evolution."  Science,  v.  123,  No.  3204  (May  25,  1956). 

135.  Emiliani,  Cesare,  "Temperature  and  Age  Analysis  of  Deep-Sea 
Cores."  Science,  v.  125,  No.  3244  (March  i,  1957). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  4OJ 

136.  Emiliani,  Cesare,  personal  communication. 

137.  Ericson,  David  B.,  "North  Atlantic  Deep-Sea  Sediments  and  Sub- 
marine Canyons."  Transactions  of  the  New  York  Academy  of  Sci- 
ences, Ser.  II,  v.  15,  No.  2  (Dec.,  1952). 

138.  Ericson,  David  B.,  "Sediments  of  the  North  Atlantic."  Lamont 
Geological  Observatory  Technical  Report  on  Submarine  Geology, 
No.  i  (Nov.,  1953). 

139.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  Ewing,  Maurice,  and  Heezen,  B.  C.,  "Deep-Sea 
Sands  and  Submarine  Canyons."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  So- 
ciety  of  America,  62:961-65  (1951). 

140.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  Ewing,  Maurice,  and  Heezen,  B.  C.,  "Turbidity 
Currents  and  Sediments  in  the  North  Atlantic."  Bulletin  of  the 
American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists,  v.  36,  No.  3  (March, 
1952).  (Reprint.) 

141.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  Ewing,  Maurice,  Heezen,  B.  C.,  and  Wollin,  Goesta, 
"Sediment  Deposition  in  the  Deep  Atlantic."  Lamont  Geological 
Observatory  Contribution  No.  130.  Geological  Society  of  America 
Special  Paper  62  (1955). 

142.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  and  Wollin,  Goesta,  "Correlation  of  Six  Cores  from 
the  Equatorial  Atlantic  and  the  Caribbean."  Deep-Sea  Research, 
3:104-25  (1956). 

143.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  and  Wollin,  Goesta,  "Micropaleontological  and 
Isotopic  Determinations  of  Pleistocene  Climates."  Micropaleontol- 
ogyf  v.  2,  No.  3  (July,  1956). 

144.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  et  al.t  "Late  Pleistocene  Climates  and  Deep-Sea 
Sediment."  Science,  v.  124,  No.  3218  (Aug.  31,  1956). 

145.  Ericson,  D.  B.,  personal  communication. 

146.  Ewing,   Maurice,  and  Donn,  W.   L.,  "A  Theory  of  Ice  Ages." 
Science,  v.  123,  No.  3207  (June  15,  1956). 

147.  Ewing,  Heezen,  Ericson,  Northrup,  and  Dorman,  "Exploration  of 
the  Northwest  Atlantic  Mid-Ocean  Canyon."  Bulletin  of  the  Geo- 
logical Society  of  America,  64:865-68  (July,  1953). 

148.  Farrington,  William,  personal  communication. 

149.  Faul,   Henry,  ed.,  Nuclear  Geology,  a  Symposium.   New  York, 
Wiley,  1954. 

150.  Fenner,    C.   N.,    "Pleistocene   Climate   and   Topography   of   the 
Arequipa  Region,  Peru."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of 
America,  v.  59,  No.  9  (Sept.,  1948). 

151.  Fenton,  C.  L.,  "Paleontology  and  Mathematical  Evolution."  Pan- 
American  Geologist,  v.  LV,  No.  3,  pp.  162-74  (April,  1931). 

152.  Finnegan,  H.  E.,  personal  communication. 

153.  Fisk,  H.  N.,  and  McFarlan,  E.,  "Late  Quaternary  Deltaic  Deposits 
of  the  Mississippi  River."  See  Poldervaart. 

154.  Fleming,  J.  A.,  ed.,  Terrestrial  Magnetism  and  Electricity.  (Vol. 


404  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

VIII  of  "Physics  of  the  Earth,"  published  under  the  auspices  of 
the  National  Research  Council.)  New  York,  Dover,  1949. 

155.  Flint,  R.  F.,  Knopf,  A.,  and  Longwell,  R.,   Outline  of  Physical 
Geology ,  2d  ed.  New  York,  Wiley,  1941. 

156.  Flint,  Richard  Foster,  Glacial  Geology  and  the  Pleistocene  Epoch. 
New  York,  Wiley,  1947. 

157.  Flint,   Richard  Foster,   "Rates  of  Advance  and  Retreat   of   the 
Margin  of  the  Late  Wisconsin  Ice  Sheet."  American  Journal  of 
Science,  253:649-58  (1955). 

158.  Flint,  Richard  Foster,  personal  communication. 

159.  Flint,  R.  F.,  and  Deevey,  E.  S.,   "Radiocarbon  Dating  of  Late 
Pleistocene  Events."  American  Journal  of  Science,  v.  249,  No.  4 
(April,  1951). 

160.  Flint,  R.  F.,  and  Dorsey,  H.  G.,  "lowan  and  Tazewell  Drifts  and 
the  North  American  Ice  Sheet."  American  Journal  of  Science, 
v.  243,  No.  11,  p.  627  (1945)- 

161.  Flint,  R.  F.,  and  Dorsey,  H.  G.,  "Glaciation  of  Siberia."  Bulletin 
of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  56:89-106  (1945). 

162.  Flint,  R.  F.,  and  Dorsey,  H.  G.,  "Radiocarbon  Dates  of  Pre-Man- 
kato  Events  in  Eastern  and  Central  North  America."  Science,  v. 
121,  No.  3149  (May  6,  1955). 

163.  Forbes,  W.  H.,  "On  the  Anatomy  of  the  Indian  Elephant."  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Royal  Society  of  London,  1879,  PP-  42O~35- 

164.  Forrest,  H.  Edward,  The  Atlantean  Continent,  London,  Witherby, 

1933- 

165.  Foster,  J.  W.,  Pre-Historic  Races  of  the  United  States.  Chicago, 
Griggs,  1887. 

166.  Frank,  Phillip,  review  of  Essay  in  Physics,  by  Lord  Samuel.  New 
York  Times  Book  Review  (Feb.  17,  1952). 

167.  Frankland,  John  M.,  personal  communication. 

168.  Frankland,  John  M.,  conference. 

169.  Gamow,  George,  Biography  of  the  Earth.  New  York,  Viking,  1948. 

170.  Geikie,  Sir  Archibald,  Text  Book  of  Geology,  3d  ed.  New  York 
and  London,  Macmillan,  1893. 

171.  George,  T.  Neville,  "Geology."  Science  Progress,  v.  XLIII,  No. 
169  (Jan.,  1955). 

172.  Gerard,   R.  W.,   "Experiments  in   Micro-Evolution."   Science,  v. 
120,  No.  3123  (Nov.  5,  1954). 

173.  Gidley,  James  Williams,  Notice  of  the  Occurrence  of  a  Pleistocene 
Camel  North  of  the  Arctic  Circle.  Smithsonian  Miscellaneous  Col- 
lections, v.  60,  No.  26  (March  21,  1913).  Publication  number  2173. 

174.  Gilligan,  Albert,  "A  Contribution  to  the  Geologic  History  of  the 
North  Atlantic  Region."  Presidential  address  before  the  Yorkshire 
Geological  Society.  Reprinted  in  the  Annual  Report  of  the  Smith- 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  405 

sonian  Institution,   1932,  pp.  207-22.  Washington,   Government 
Printing  Office,  1933. 

175.  Gilluly,    James,    "Geologic    Contrasts    Between    Continents    and 
Ocean  Basins."  See  Poldervaart. 

176.  Gold,  T.,  "Instability  of  the  Earth's  Axis  of  Rotation."  Nature,  v. 
175,  No.  4456,  pp.  526-29  (March  26,  1955). 

177.  Goldring,  Winifred,  "Algal  Barrier  Reefs  in  the  Lower  Ozarkian 
of  New  York."  New  York  State  Museum  Bulletin,  No.  315.  Albany, 
University  of  New  York,  1938. 

178.  Goldring,  Winifred,  "Handbook  of  Paleontology  for  Beginners 
and  Amateurs.  Part  I.  The  Fossils."  New   York  State  Museum 
Handbook  9.  Albany,  University  of  New  York,  1950. 

179.  Goldschmidt,  Richard,  "Different  Philosophies  of  Genetics."  Sci- 
ence, v.  119,  No.  3099  (May  21,  1954). 

180.  Goldschmidt,   Richard,    The  Material  Basis   of  Evolution.   New 
Haven,  Yale,  1940." 

181.  Good,  Ronald,  "The  Present  Position  of  the  Theory  of  Conti- 
nental Drift."  Nature,  v.  166,  No.  4223  (Oct.  7,  1950). 

182.  Gordianko,  in  the  Red  Star,  May  18,  1954. 

183.  Grabau,  Amadeus  W.,  The  Rhythm  of  the  Ages;  Earth  History  in 
the  Light  of  the  Pulsation  and  Polar  Control  Theories.  Peking, 
Vetch,  1940. 

184.  Grabau,  Amadeus  W.,  A  Textbook  of  Geology.  Part  II:  Historical 
Geology.  New  York,  Heath,  1920. 

185.  Graham,  John  W.,  "Evidence  of  Polar  Shift  Since  Triassic  Time." 
Journal  of  Geophysical  Research,  v.  60,  No.  3  (Sept.,  1955). 

186.  Graham,  John  W.,  "Rock  Magnetism."  In  Tuve,  Annual  Report 
for  1955-1956  (which  see). 

187.  Graham,  John  W.,  personal  communication. 

188.  Graham,  J.  W.,  Torreson,  O.  W.,  and  Bowles,  E.,  "Magnetic  Polar- 
ization of  Silurian  Sediments  of  the  Eastern  United  States."  Ab- 
stract,  Transactions  of  the  American  Geophysical  Union,  v.  31, 
No.  328  (1950). 

189.  Gray,  George  W.,  "The  Lamont  Geological  Observatory."  Scien- 
tific American,  v.  195,  No.  6  (Dec.,  1956). 

iSga.  Greene,  Walter,  personal  communication. 

190.  Gregory,  Joseph  T.,  "Vertebrates  in  the  Geologic  Time  Scale."  See 
Poldervaart. 

191.  Gregory,  J.  W.,  "Geological  History  of  the  Pacific  Ocean."  Nature, 
v.  125,  No.  3159  (May  17,  1930). 

192.  Griffiths,   D.  H.,   and   King,   R.   F.,   "Natural   Magnetization  of 
Igneous  and  Sedimentary  Rocks."  Nature,  v.  173,  No.  4415,  pp. 
1114-16. 


406  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

193.  Griggs,  David,  "A  Theory  of  Mountain  Building."  American  Jour- 
nal of  Science,  237:611-50. 

194.  Gutenberg,  Beno,  ed.,  Internal  Constitution  of  the  Earth.  New 
York,  Dover,  1951. 

195.  Gutenberg,  B.,  and  Richter,  C.  F.,  Seismicity  of  the  Earth  and 
Associated  Phenomena.  Princeton,  University  Press,  1950. 

196.  Halle,  T.  B.,  "On  the  Geological  Structure  of  the  Falk  Islands." 
Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Institute  of  the  University  of  Upsala, 
11:115-229. 

197.  Hamilton,  Edwin  L.,  "Upper  Cretaceous,  Tertiary,  and  Recent 
Planktonic  Foraminifera  from  the  Mid-Pacific  Flat-Topped  Sea 
Mounts."  Journal  of  Paleontology,  27:207-37. 

198.  Hansen,  Henry  P.,  "Postglacial  Forest  Succession  and  Climate  in 
the  Oregon  Cascades."  American  Journal  of  Science,  v.  244,  No. 
10  (Oct.,  1946). 

199.  Hansen,  L.  Taylor,  Some  Considerations  of  and  Additions  to  the 
Taylor-Wegner  Hypothesis   of   Continental  Displacement.   Pam- 
phlet copyrighted  July,  1946,  by  L.  Taylor  Hansen,  1158  W.  35th 
St.,  Los  Angeles  7,  Cal.  (In  the  New  York  Public  Library.) 

sjoo.  Hapgood,  Mrs.  Norman  (Elizabeth  Reynolds),  translation  of  the 
report  on  the  stomach  contents  of  the  Beresovka  mammoth  (un- 
published). See  Sukachev. 

soi.  Hardy,  M.  E.,  The  Geography  of  Plants.  Oxford,  University  Press, 
1920. 

202.  Harris,  Herbert,  "The  Amazing  Frozen  Foods  Industry."  Science 
Digest,  v.  29,  No.  2  (Feb.,  1951).  (Condensed  from  The  Reporter, 
Oct.  24,  1950.) 

203.  Hartnagel,  C.  A.,  and  Bishop,  Sherman  C.,  "The  Mastodons,  Mam- 
moths and  Other  Pleistocene  Mammals  of  New  York  State."  New 
York  State  Museum  Bulletins  241-242.  Albany,  1922. 

204.  Haskell,  N.  A.,  "The  Motions  of  a  Viscous  Fluid  under  a  Surface 
Load."  Physics,  6:265-69  (1935);  7*56-31  (1936). 

205.  Heezen,  Bruce  C.,  and  Ewing,  Maurice,  "Turbidity  Currents  and 
Submarine    Slumps,    and   the    1929    Grand   Banks    Earthquake." 
Lamont  Geological  Observatory  Contribution  No.  65.  American 
Journal  of  Science,  v.  250  (Dec.,  1952). 

206.  Henry,  Thomas  R.,   The  White  Continent.  New  York,  William 
Sloane  Associates,  1950. 

207.  Henry,  Thomas  R.,  "Poles  Wander;  Earth  Crust  Falls  Off."  North 
American  Newspaper  Alliance  (Jan.  27,  1952). 

208.  Herz,  O.  F.,  "Frozen  Mammoth  in  Siberia."  Smithsonian  Reports, 

*9°3- 

209.  Hess,  H.  H.,  "Comments  on  Mountain  Building."  Transactions  of 
the  American  Geophysical  Union,  V:  528-31. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  407 

*io.    Hess,  H.  H.,  "Drowned  Ancient  Islands  of  the  Pacific  Basin." 
Smithsonian  Reports,  1947. 

211.  Hibben,  Frank  C.,  "Evidence  of  Early  Man  in  Alaska."  American 
Antiquity,  VIII:  256  (1943). 

212.  Hibben,  Frank  C.,  The  Lost  Americans.  New  York,  Crowell,  1946. 

213.  Hibben,  Frank  C.,  Treasure  in  the  Dust.  Philadelphia  and  New 
York,  Lippincott,  1951. 

214.  Hillaby,  John,  "Earth  as  Magnet  Said  to  Weaken."  New  York 
Times  (Dec.  26,  1956). 

215.  Hobbs,  William  H.,  Earth  Evolution  and  Its  Facial  Expression. 
New  York,  Macmillan,  1922. 

216.  Hobbs,  William  H.,  Earth  Features  and   Their  Meaning.  New 
York,  Macmillan,  1935. 

217.  Hobbs,  William  H.,  "Repeating  Patterns  in  the  Relief  and  in  the 
Structure   of   the   Land."  Bulletin   of  the   Geological  Society   of 
America,  v.  22  (1911). 

218.  Hobbs,  William  H.,  "The  Correlations  of  Fracture  Systems  and 
the  Evidence  for  Planetary  Dislocations  within  the  Earth's  Crust." 
Reprinted  from  Transactions  of  the  Wisconsin  Academy  of  Sci- 
ences, Arts  and  Letters,  XV 115-29  (Aug.,  1905). 

219.  Hobbs,  William  H.,  "Eurasian  Continental  Glacier  of  the  Late 
Pleistocene."  Science,  v.  104,  No.  2692  (Aug.  2,  1946). 

220.  Hodgman  and  Lange,  Handbook  of  Chemistry  and  Physics.  Cleve- 
land, Chemical  Rubber  Publishing  Co.,  1927. 

221.  Hoffman,  Bernhard  C.,  "Implications  of  Radiocarbon  Datings  for 
the  Origins  of  Dorset  Culture."  American  Antiquity,  v.  XVIII, 
No.  i  (July,  1952). 

222.  Horberg,  Leland,  "Radiocarbon  Dates  and  Pleistocene  Geological 
Problems  of  the  Mississippi  Valley  Region."  Journal  of  Geology, 
v.  63,  No.  3  (May,  1955). 

223.  Hospers,  J.,  "Rock  Magnetism  and  Pole  Wandering."  Journal  of 
Geology,  v.  63,  No.  i  (Jan.,  1955). 

224.  Hough,  Jack,  "Pacific  Climatic  Record  in  a  Pacific  Ocean  Core 
Sample."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  61,  No.  3  (May,  1953). 

225.  Hough,  Jack,  "Pleistocene  Lithology  of  Antarctic  Ocean  Bottom 
Sediments."  Journal  of  Geology,  58:257-59. 

2253.  Howorth,  H.  H.,  "The  Mammoth  and  the  Flood."  Geological  Mag- 
azine, New  Series,  8:309-15  (1881). 

226.  Hubbert,  M.  King,  and  Melton,  F.  A.,  "Isostasy,  A  Critical  Re- 
view." Journal  of  Geology,  v.  38,  No.  8  (Nov.-Dec.,  1930). 

227.  Hubbert,  M.  King,  personal  communication. 

228.  "Humble  Oil  Radiocarbon  Dates  I."  H.  R.  Brannon,  Jr.,  et  al. 
Science,  v.  125,  No.  3239  (Jan.  25,  1957). 

229.  "Humble  Oil  Radiocarbon  Dates  II."  Brannon,  Simons,   Perry, 


408  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

Daughtry,  and  McFarlan.  Science,  v.  125,  No.  3254  (May  10,  1957) 

230.  Humphreys,  A.  A.,  and  Abbot,  H.  L.,  Report  on  the  Physics  ant 
Hydraulics  of   the  Mississippi  River.  Washington,   Governmen 
Printing  Office,  1867. 

231.  Humphreys,  W.  J.,  Physics  of  the  Air.  Philadelphia,  Lippincott 
1920. 

232.  Huntington,  Ellsworth,  The  Pulse  of  Asia.  Boston  and  New  York 
Houghton  Mifflin,  1907. 

233.  International  Bathymetric  Chart  of   the   Oceans.   Monte   Carlo 
Monaco,  International  Hydrographic  Bureau. 

234.  Jaggar,  Thomas  A.,  "Living  on  a  Volcano."  National  Geography 
Magazine,  v.  LXVIII,  No.  i  (July,  1935). 

235.  Jaggar,  Thomas  A.,  Volcanoes  Declare  War.  Honolulu,  Paradise 
of  the  Pacific,  1945. 

236.  Jannsen,  Raymond  E.,  "The  History  of  a  River."  Scientific  Amer 
ican  (June,  1952). 

237.  Jardetsky,  W.  S.,  "The  Principal  Characteristics  of  the  Formatioi 
of  the  Earth's  Crust."  Science,  119:361-65  (March  19,  1954). 

238.  Jeffreys,  Harold,  The  Earth,  2d  ed.  New  York,  Macmillan,  1929. 

239.  Jeffreys,  Harold,  The  Earth,  3d  ed.  New  York,  Cambridge  Uni 
versity  Press,  1953. 

240.  Jeffreys,  Harold,  The  Theory  of  Probability.  Oxford,  Clarendon 


241.  Jeffreys,  Harold,  personal  communication. 

242.  Johnson,  Frederick,  ed.,  "Radiocarbon  Dating."  Memoirs  of  th( 
Society  for  American  Archeology,  No.  8  (1951).  Salt  Lake  City,  BT 
the  Society. 

243.  Johnson,   L.   H.,   "Men   and   Elephants   in  America."   Scientific 
Monthly  (Oct.,  1952). 

244.  Joly,  J.,  "The  Theory  of  Thermal  Cycles."  Gerlands  Beitrdge  zu 
Geophysik,  XIX:  4  15-41  (1928). 

245.  Kahn,  Fritz,  Design  of  the  Universe.  New  York,  Crown,  1954. 

246.  Kalb,  Bernhard,  "Adventure  on  the  Mysterious  Continent."  Nev 
York  Times  Magazine  (Feb.  19,  1954). 

247.  Karlstrom,  Thor,  "Tentative  Correlation  of  Alaskan  Glacial  Se 
quences."  Science,  v.  125,  No.  3237  (Jan.  11,  1957). 

248.  Kelly,  Allan  O.,  and  Dachille,  Frank,   Target  Earth.  Pensacola 
Florida,  Pensacola  Engraving,  1953.  (In  the  library  of  the  Amei 
ican  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New  York.) 

249.  Kent,  William,  The  Mechanical  Engineer's  Pocket-Book,  8th  ed 
New  York,  Wiley,  1913. 

250.  Kimball,  Arthur  L.,  College  Physics,  2d  rev.  ed.  New  York,  Holt 


251.    King,  Lester  C.,  "The  Necessity  for  Continental  Drift."  Bulletin 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  409 

of  the  American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists,  37:2163-77 
(July-Sept.,   1953). 

252.  Kingdon-Ward,    F.,    "Caught    in    the   Assam-Tibet    Earthquake." 
National  Geographic  Magazine,  v.  CI,  No.  3  (March,  1952). 

253.  Knowlton,  F.  H.,  "The  Evolution  of  Geological  Climates."  Bulletin 
of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  30:499-566  (1919). 

254.  Knowlton,  F.  H.,  The  Fossil  Forests  of  Yellowstone  National  Park. 
Washington,  Department  of  the  Interior,  1914. 

255.  Koppen,    Vladimir,    "Das    Klima    Patagoniens    im    Tertiar    und 
Quartiar."  Gerlands  Beitrdge  zur  Geophysik,  17:391-94  (1927). 

256.  Kreichgauer,  Damian,  Die  Aequatorfrage  in  der  Geologic,  2d  ed. 
Steyl,  Haldenkirche,  1926. 

257.  Kroeber,  Alfred  Louis,  Anthropology,  rev.  ed.  New  York,  Har- 
court,  Brace,  1948. 

258.  Krumbein,  W.  C.,  and  Sloss,  L.  I.,  Stratigraphy  and  Sedimentation. 
San  Francisco,  Freeman,  1951. 

259.  Kulp,  J.  Laurence,  and  Carr,  Donald  R.,  "Surface  Area  of  Deep- 
Sea  Currents."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  60,  No.  2  (March,  1952). 

260.  Lack,  D.  L.,  "Darwin's  Finches."  Scientific  American,  v.  188,  No.  16 
(April,  1953). 

261.  Ladd,  Harold  S.,  and  Brown,  Roland  W.,  "Fossils  Lift  the  Veil  of 
Time."  National  Geographic  Magazine,  v.  CIX,  No.  3  (March, 

1956). 

262.  "Lamont   Natural   Radiocarbon    Measurements   I,"   J.    Laurence 
Kulp.  Science,  v.  114,  No.  2970  (Nov.  30,  1951). 

263.  "Lamont   Natural   Radiocarbon   Measurements  II,"   J.    L.    Kulp 
et  al.  Science,  v.  116,  No.  3016  (Oct.  17,  1952). 

264.  "Lamont    Natural    Radiocarbon    Measurements    III,"    Broecker, 
Kulp,  and  Tucek.  Science,  v.  124,  No.  3213  (July  27,  1956). 

265.  Landes,  Kenneth  K.,  Petroleum  Geology.  New  York,  Wiley,  1951. 

266.  Lane,  F.  C.,  The  Story  of  Mountains.  New  York,  Doubleday,  1950. 

267.  Lane,  F.  C.,  The  Mysterious  Sea.  Garden  City,  N.  Y.,  Doubleday, 

1947- 

268.  Laplace,  Marquis  P.  S.  de,  Mecanique  celeste.  Translated  with  a 
commentary  by  Nathaniel  Bowditch.  Boston,  Little  Brown,  1839. 
4  vols. 

269.  Leighton,   M.   M.,  and  Wright,   H.   E.,  "Radiocarbon  Dates  of 
Mankato  Drift  in  Minnesota."  Science,  v.  125,  No.  3256  (May  24, 

1957). 

270.  Levitt,  J.,  "The  Mechanics  of  Freezing."  Science,  v.  125, 'No.  3240 
(Feb.  i,  1957). 

271.  Levy,  Hyman,  Modern  Science.  New  York,  Knopf,  1938. 

272.  Libby,  Willard  F.,  Radiocarbon  Dating.  Chicago,  University  of 
Chicago,  1952.  See  also  "Chicago  Radiocarbon  Dates." 


410  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

273.  Loffelholz    von    Colberg,    Carl    Freiherr,    Die    Drehungen    der 
Erdkruste  in  geologischen  Zeitraumen,  2d  ed.  Munich,  1895. 

274.  The  London  Times  (Sept.  9,  1954). 

275.  Longfellow,  Dwight  W.,  "Continental  Drift  and  Earth's  Magnetic 
Poles  and  Foci."  Pan-American  Geologist,  v.  LV,  No.  3  (April, 

1931)- 

276.  Louisiana  Department  of  Conservation,  Bulletin  No.  8. 

277.  Lucas,  Frederick  A.,  "The  Truth  about  the  Mammoth."  Annual 
Report  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  1899,  pp.  353-59. 

278.  Lull,  Richard  Swann,  Organic  Evolution.  New  York,  Macmillan, 
1927. 

279.  Luyet,  B.  J.,  and  Gehenio,  P.  M.,  Life  and  Death  at  Low  Tempera- 
tures. Normandy,  Mo.,  Biodynamica,  1940. 

280.  Lydekker,    Richard,    "Mammoth    Ivory."    Smithsonian    Reports, 
1899,  pp.  361-66. 

281.  Lyell,  Sir  Charles,  Principles  of  Geology,  rev.  (gih)  ed.  New  York, 
Appleton,  1854. 

282.  Lyell,  Sir  Charles,   The  Antiquity  of  Man,  4th  ed.,  rev.   Phila- 
delphia, Lippincott,  1873. 

283.  Lyell,  Sir  Charles,  Travels  in  North  America.  New  York,  Wiley, 
1852. 

284.  Lyman,  Charles  P.,  personal  communication. 

285.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  Research  on  the  Past  Climate  and  Continental 
Drift,  Vol.  L  The  Climate  and  Relative  Positions  of  Eurasia  and 
North  America  during  the  Ordovician  Period  as  Determined  by 
the   Growth  Rate   of  Corals.  Fukien,   China,   published   by   the 
author,  July,  1943.  (Professor  Ma  was  at  this  time  head  of  the 
Department  of  Oceanography  of  the  China  Institute  of  Geog- 
raphy.) 

286.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  Research  on  the  Past  Climate,  etc.  Vol.  II. 
The  Climate  and  Relative  Positions  of  the  Continents  during  the 
Silurian  Period  as  Determined  by  the  Growth  Rate  of  Corals. 
Fukien,  published  by  the  author,  August,  1943. 

287.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  Research  on  the  Past  Climate,  etc.  Vol.  HI. 
The  Climate  and  Relative  Positions  of  the  Continents  during  the 
Devonian  Period.  Fukien,  published  by  the  author,  November, 

1943- 

288.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  Research  on  the  Past  Climate,  etc.  Vol.  IV. 
The  Equator  and  the  Relative  Positions  of  the  Continents  during 
the   Cretaceous  Period  as  Deduced  from    the  Distribution   and 
Growth  Values  of  Reef  Corals.  Taipei,  Taiwan  (Formosa),  pub- 
lished by  the  author,  August,  1951.  (Professor  Ma  has  been  con- 
nected since  this  time  with  Taiwan  National  University.) 

289.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  Research  on  the  Past  Climate,  etc.   Vol.   V. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  411 

The  Shifting  in  Pole-Positions  with  Diastrophisms  since  the  End 
of  the  Cretaceous,  and  the  Accompanying  Drift  of  Continents.  (22 
plates,  i  chart,  7  figures.)  Taipei,  Taiwan  (Formosa),  published 
by  the  author,  May,  1952. 

290.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  Research  on  the  Past  Climate,  etc.  Vol.  VI. 
The  Sudden  Total  Displacement  of  the  Outer  Solid  Earth  Shell 
by  Slidings  Relative  to  the  Fixed  Rotating  Core  of  the  Earth. 
Taipei,  Taiwan  (Formosa). 

NOTE:  These  volumes  are  available  at  the  Schermerhorn 
Library,  Columbia  University.  They  may  also  be  obtained 
from  the  World  Book  Co.,  Ltd.,  99  Chung  King  Road,  ist 
section,  Taipei,  Taiwan  (Formosa),  China. 

291.  Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,   "Alteration  of  Sedimentary  Facies  on   the 
Ocean  Bottom  and  Shortness  of  the  Period  of  Diastrophism  after 
a  Sudden  Total  Displacement  of  the  Solid  Earth  Shell."  Oceano- 
graphica  Sinica,  v.  II,  Fasc.  I  (Sept.,  1955). 

2913.  Malaise,  Rene",  "Oceanic  Bottom  Investigations  and  Their  Bear- 
ings on  Geology."  Reprinted  from  Geologiska  Foreningens  I. 
Stockholm,  Forhandlingar  (March-April,  1957). 

29 ib.  Mallery,  Arlington  H.,  Lost  America.  Washington,  Overlook,  1956. 

292.  Manson,  Marsden,  "The  Evolution  of  Climates."  Revised  and  re- 
printed from   The  American    Geologist.   Minneapolis,   Franklin, 

1903- 

293.  Marriott,  R.  A.,   Warmer  Winters  and  the  Earth's  Tilt.  Exeter, 
England,  Pollard,  1921. 

294.  Mather,  Kirtley  F.,  conference. 

2943.  Matthes,  Francois  E.,  "Rebirth  of  the  Glaciers  in  the  Sierra 
Nevada  during  Late  Post-Pleistocene  Time."  Bulletin  of  the  Geo- 
logical Society  of  America,  v.  52,  No.  12,  Pt.  2,  p.  2030. 

295.  Matthew,  W.  D.,  Climate  and  Evolution,  2d  ed.  New  York,  New 
York  Academy  of  Sciences,  1939. 

296.  Maxwell,  James  Clerk,  "On  a  Dynamical  Top."   The  Scientific 
Papers  of  James  Clerk  Maxwell,  Vol.  I.,  edited  by  W.  D.  Niven, 
M.A.,  F.R.S.,  Cambridge,  University  Press,  1890.  (2  vols.) 

297.  Mayo,  Captain  Charles  A.,  conference. 

298.  Mayor,  A.  G.,  "Growth  Rate  of  Samoan  Corals."  Papers  from  the 
Department  of  Marine  Biology  of  the  Carnegie   Institution  of 
Washington,  Vol.  XIX.  Some  Posthumous  Papers  of  A.  G.  Mayor, 
pp.  5 1-72. 

299.  Meinesz,  F.  A.  Vening,  "Indonesian  Archipelago:  A  Geophysical 
Study."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  v.  65,  No.  2, 
pp.  143-64  (Feb.,  1954). 


412  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

300.  Meinesz,   F.  A.  Vening,   "Major  Tectonic  Phenomena  and   the 
Hypothesis  of  Convection  Currents  in  the  Earth."  Quarterly  Jour- 
nal of  the  Geological  Society  of  London,  103:191-207   (Jan.  31, 
1948). 

301.  Meinesz,   F.  A.  Vening,   "Shear  Patterns  of  the  Earth's   Crust." 
Transactions  of  the  American  Geophysical  Union,  28:1-61  (1947). 

302.  Menard,  Henry  W.,   "Fractures  in  the  Pacific  Floor."   Scientific 
American,  v.  193,  No.  i  (July,  1955). 

303.  Merrill,  Elmer  D.,  Plant  Life  of  the  Pacific  World.  New  York, 
Macmillan,  1945. 

304.  Meryman,  Harold  T.,  "Mechanics  of  Freezing  in  Living  Cells  and 
Tissues."  Science,  v.  124,  No.  3221  (Sept.  21,  1956). 

305.  Meryman,  Harold  T.,  [Reply  to  Levitt].  Science,  v.  125,  No.  3240 
(Feb.  i,  1957). 

Michigan  Radiocarbon  Dates.  See  "University  of  Michigan  Radio- 
carbon Dates." 

306.  Miller,  Arthur  Austin,  The  Skin  of  the  Earth.  London,  Methuen, 

1953- 

307.  Miller,    Hugh,    The    Old   Red  Sandstone,    i4th   ed.    Edinburgh, 
Nimmo,   1871. 

308.  Millis,   John,   "The  Glacial   Period   and   Drayson's  Hypothesis." 
Popular  Astronomy,  v.  30,  No.  10.  Reprinted  for  the  Fortean  So- 
ciety by  K.  M.  McMahon,  1945. 

309.  Moodie,  Roy  L.,  A  Popular  Guide  to  the  Nature  and  the  Environ- 
ment of  the  Fossil  Vertebrates  of  New  York.  Albany,  University  of 
the  State  of  New  York,  1933. 

310.  Moody,  Paul  A.,  Introduction  to  Evolution.  New  York,  Harper, 

1953- 

311.  Moore,  Raymond  C.,  "Late  Paleozoic  Cyclic  Sedimentation  in  the 
Central  United  States.1'   1950.  Reprinted  from  the  International 
Geological  Congress,  Report  of  the  i8th  Session,  Great  Britain 
1948,  Pt.  IV. 

312.  Muench,  O.  B.,  "Determining  Geological  Age  from  Radioactivity." 
Scientific  Monthly,  v.  LXXI,  No.  5  (Nov.,  1950). 

313.  Munk,  W.  H.,  "Polar  Wandering:  A  Marathon  of  Errors."  Nature, 
v.  177,  No.  4508,  p.  551. 

314.  Munk,  Walter,  and  Revelle,  Roger,  "Sea  Level  and  the  Rotation 
of  the  Earth."  American  Journal  of  Science,  250:829-33   (Nov., 

1952). 

315.  Munk,  Walter,  and  Revelle,  Roger,  "Remarks  at  the  Geophysical 
Congress  in  Rome,  1954."  New  York  Herald  Tribune  (Nov.  9, 

1954)- 

316.  Murray,  Raymond  C.,  "Directions  of  Ice  Motion  in  South-Central 
Newfoundland."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  63,  No.  3  (May,  1955). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  413 

3i6a.  Nddai,  Arpad,  Plasticity;  a  Mechanics  of   the  Plastic  State   of 
Matter.  New  York,  McGraw-Hill,  1931. 

317.  Nagamiya,  T.,  Yosida,  K.,  and  Kubo,  R.,  "Antiferromagnetism." 
Advances  in  Physics,  v.  4,  No.  13  (Jan.,  1955). 

318.  Nagata,  T.,  Rock  Magnetism.  Tokyo,  Maruzen,  1953. 

319.  Nares,  Capt.  Sir  G.  S.,  Narrative  of  a  Voyage  to  the  Polar  Sea  dur- 
ing 1875—6,  2d  ed.  London,  Samson  Low,  Mars  ton,  Searle,  and 
Rivington,   1878,  2  vols. 

320.  Nathorst,  A.  G.,  "On  the  Value  of  the  Fossil  Floras  of  the  Arctic 
Regions  as  Evidence  of  Geological  Climates."   Smithsonian  Re- 
ports, 1911. 

321.  National  Geographic  Magazine,  v.  CI,  No.  i  (Jan.,  1952).  Meen 
and  Stewart,  "Solving  the  Riddle  of  the  Chubb  Crater." 

322.  National  Geographic  Magazine,  v.  XCVIII,  No.  4  (Oct.,   1950). 
Rees  and  Bell,  "Sky-High  Bolivia." 

323.  Ne'e!,   L.,  "Inversion   de  I'aimantation  permanente  des  roches." 
Annales  geophysiques,  7:90-102  (1951). 

324.  Ne*el,  L.,  "Some  Theoretical  Aspects  of  Rock  Magnetism."  Ad- 
vances in  Physics,  v.  4,  No.  14,  pp.  191-243  (April,  1955). 

3243.  Negris,  P.,  "Atlantide."  Revue  scientifique,  v.  60,  pp.  614-17  (Sept. 
23,  1922). 

325.  Neuville,  H.,  "On  the  Extinction  of  the  Mammoth."  Smithsonian 
Reports,  1919. 

326.  New  and  Old  Discoveries  in  Antarctica  (Discussion  of  the  Piri  Reis 
Map).  The  Georgetown  University  Forum,  verbatim  text  (mimeo- 
graphed) of  the  radio  broadcast  of  August  26,  1956. 

327.  The  New  York  Times  (Dec.  9,  1949). 

328.  The  New  York  Times  (Sept.  8,  1954). 

329.  The  New  York  Times  (Oct.  16,  1955). 

330.  The  New  York  Times  (May  6,  1956). 

331.  The  New  York  Times  (Sept.  23,  1956). 

332.  The  New  York  Times  (Dec.  26,  1956). 

333.  Nicholls,  G.  D.,  "The  Mineralogy  of  Rock  Magnetism."  Advances 
in  Physics,  v.  4,  No.  14  (April,  1955). 

334.  Nordenskjold,  N.  A.  E.,  The  Voyage  of  the  Vega  round  Asia  and 
Europe.   Translated  by  Alexander   Leslie.   London,   Macmillan, 
1881.  2  vols. 

335.  Nordenskjold,  Dr.  N.  O.  G.,  and  Anderson,  Dr.  J.  G.,  Antarctica, 
or  Two  Years  Amidst  the  Ice  of  the  South  Pole.  London  and  New 
York,  Macmillan,  1905. 

336.  North  American   Newspaper  Alliance.   "Shifts  in  Earth's  Crust 
Millions  of  Years  Ago  a  Puzzle  to  Geologists."  Dec.  15,  1949. 

337.  Olivier,  Charles  P.,  Meteors.  Baltimore,  Williams  and  Wilkins, 
1925- 


414  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

338.  O'Neill,   John  J.,   "Clues   to   Life's  Secret."   New  York  Herald 
Tribune,  Sect.  2,  p.  12  (April  13,  1952). 

339.  Opdyke,  N.  D.,  and  Runcorn,  S.  K.,  "New  Evidence  for  the  Re- 
versal of  the  Geomagnetic  Field  Near  the  Plio-Pleistocene  Bound- 
ary." Science,  v.  123,  No.  3208  (June  22,  1956). 

340.  Osborn,  Henry  Fairfield,  The  Proboscidea.  New  York,  American 
Museum  of  Natural  History,  1936-42. 

341.  Parks,  J.  M.,  "Corals  from  the  Brazer  Formation  (Mississippian) 
of  Northern  Utah."  Journal  of  Paleontology,  25:171-86  (March, 

1950- 

342.  Pauly,  K.  A.,  "The  Cause  of  Great  Ice  Ages."  Scientific  Monthly 

(Aug.,  1952). 

343.  Peattie,  Roderick,  ed.,  The  Inverted  Mountains:  Canyons  of  the 
West.  New  York,  Vanguard,  1948. 

343a.  Pettersson,  Hans,  "The  Swedish  Deep-Sea  Expedition  [1947-1948]." 
Geological  Journal,  v.  114,  Nos.  4-6  (1948);  v.  114,  No.  406  (1949). 

344.  Piggott,  C.  S.,  and  Urry,  W.  D.,  "Time  Relations  in  Ocean  Sedi- 
ments." Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  v.  53,  No. 
8,  pp.  1187-1210  (Aug.,  1942). 

345.  Pirsson,  Louis  V.,  and  Schuchert,  Charles,  A  Textbook  of  Geology. 
New  York,  Wiley,  1929. 

346.  Plass,  Gilbert  N.,  "Smoky  World  Gets  Hotter."  Science  Digest, 
back  cover  (August,  1953). 

347.  Plumb,  Robert  K.,  New  York   Times,  Science  Review  (Jan.  4, 

1953). 

348.  Poddar,  M.  C.,  "Preliminary  Report  of  the  Assam  Earthquake  of 
August  15,   1950."  Bulletin,  Series  B,  Engineering  Geology  and 
Ground  Water,  No.  3.  The  Geological  Survey  of  India. 

349.  Poldervaart,  Arie,  ed.,  Symposium   on   the   Crust  of  the  Earth. 
Special  Paper  62.  Geological  Society  of  America,  1955. 

349a.  Pollock,  James  B.,  "Fringing  and  Fossil  Reefs  of  Oahu."  Bernice  P. 

Bishop  Museum  Bulletin  No.  55.  Honolulu,  1928. 
349b.  Priestly,  Raymond  E.,  Antarctic  Adventure.  New  York,  Button, 


350.  Pringle,  R.  W.,  et  al.,  "Radiocarbon  Age  Estimates  Obtained  by 
an  Improved  Liquid  Scintillation  Technique."  Science,  v.  125,  No. 

3237  (Jan-  "•  1957)- 

351.  Proceedings  of  the  British  Association  for  the  Advancement  of 

Science,  p.  277  (Dec.,  1950). 

352.  Ramsay,  William,  "Probable  Solution  of  the  Climatic  Problem  in 
Geology."  Smithsonian  Reports,  1924. 

353.  Reibisch,  P.,  "Em  Gestaltungsprinzip  der  Erde."  Jahresber.  d. 
Ver.  Erdkunde  zu  Dresden,  27:105-24  (1904).  (Second  part  ap- 
peared in  1905,  and  third  part,  dealing  with  the  ice  age,  in  1907.) 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  415 

354.  Reid,  Harry  Fielding,   The  Influence  of  Isostasy  on  Geological 
Thought.  Bulletin  78,  The  National  Research  Council,  Washing- 
ton, 1931.  (Ch.  VIII.) 

355.  Report  of  the  Committee  on  the  Measurement  of  Geologic  Time. 
National  Research  Council,  Publication  212,  Washington,  1952. 

356.  Rich,  J.  L.,  "The  Origin  of  Compressional  Mountains."  Bulletin 
of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  62:1179-1222  (1951). 

357.  Robertson,  Eugene,  personal  communication. 

358.  Rode,  K.  P.,  "A  Theory  of  Sheet  Movement  and  Continental  Ex- 
pansion." Memoirs  of  Rajputana  University  Department  of  Geol- 
ogy, No.  i.  Udaipur,  1953. 

359.  Rotta,   H.,  "Elementary  Particles,  Atomic  Power,   and  Drift  of 
Continents"  (report  of  the  1955  meeting  of  winners  of  the  Nobel 
Prize).  Science ,  v.  125,  No.  3258  (June  7,  1957). 

360.  Runcorn,   S.    K.,    "Rock   Magnetism— Geophysical   Aspects."    Ad- 
vances in  Physics,  v.  4,  No.  14  (April,  1955). 

361.  Runcorn,  S.  K.,  "Theory  of  Polar  Change  through  Subcrustal  Cur- 
rents." Advances  in  Physics,  v.  4,  No.  4  (1955). 

362.  Runcorn,  S.  K.,  "Rock  Magnetism"  (reply  to  Clegg).  Nature,  v. 
179,  No.  4565  (April  27,  195?)- 

363.  Runcorn,  S.  K.,  address  at  Columbia  University. 

364.  Saks,  N.  V.,  Belov,  N.  A.,  and  Lapina,  N.  N.,  "Our  Present  Con- 
cepts of  the  Geology  of  the  Central  Arctic."  Translated  by  E.  R. 
Hope  from  Priroda,  Defense  Scientific  Information  Service,  De- 
fense Research  Board,  Ottawa,  Canada.  Oct.  4,  1955.  (T  196  R.) 

365.  Sanderson,  Ivan  T.,  personal  communication. 

366.  Sarton,  George,  personal  communication  (see  Appendix). 

366a.  Sayles,  R.  W.,  "Bermuda  during  the  Ice  Age."  Proceedings  of  the 
American  Academy  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  v.  66,  No.  11  (1931). 

367.  Scholander,  P.  F.,  "The  Wonderful  Net."  Scientific  American,  v. 
196,  No.  4  (April,  1957). 

368.  Scholander,  P.  F.,  and  Kanwisher,  John  W.,  "Gases  in  Icebergs." 
Science,  v.  123,  No.  3186  (Jan.  20,  1956). 

369.  Schuchert,  Charles,  "Paleography  of  North  America."  Bulletin  of 
the  Geological  Society  of  America,  20:427-606  (Feb.  5,  1910). 

.  Schuchert,  Charles,  Textbook  of  Geology.  Part  II.  Historical  Geol- 
ogy. New  York,  Wiley,  1924. 

.  Schwinner,  R.,  Lehrbuch  der  physikalischen  Geologic,  1:242.  Born- 
traeger,  1936. 

370.  Science  News  Letter  (May  19,  1951). 

371.  "History  in  Bricks."  Scientific  American,  v.  196,  No.  2  (Feb.,  1957). 
Unsigned. 

372.  Scott,  W.  B.,  A  History  of  Land  Mammals  in  the  Western  Hemi- 
sphere. New  York,  Macmillan,  1937. 


416  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

373.    Seward,  A.  C.,  Plant  Life  through  the  Ages.  New  York,  Macmillan, 


374.  Shackleton,  E.  H.,  The  Heart  of  the  Antarctic.  Philadelphia,  Lip- 
pincott,  1909.  2  vols. 

375.  Shapley,  Harlow,  ed.,  Climatic  Change.  Cambridge,  Harvard  Uni- 
versity Press,  1953. 

376.  Shapley,  Harlow,  personal  communication. 

377.  Shepard,  F.  P.,  and  Suess,  H.  E.,  "Rate  of  Postglacial  Rise  of  Sea- 
Level."  Science,  v.  123,  No.  3207  (June  15,  1956). 

388.  Shull,   A.   Franklin,   Principles  of  Animal  Biology.  New  York, 
McGraw-Hill,  1929. 

389.  Simpson,  George  Gaylord,  "Periodicity  in  Vertebrate  Evolution." 
Journal  of  Paleontology,  26:359-70  (1952). 

390.  Simpson,  George  Gaylord,  The  Major  Features  of  Evolution.  New 
York,  Columbia  University  Press,  1953. 

391.  Simpson,  George  Gaylord,  Tempo  and  Mode  in  Evolution.  New 
York,  Columbia  University  Press,  1944. 

392.  Simpson,    George    Gaylord,    The    Meaning   of    Evolution.    New 
Haven,  Yale,  1952.  New  York,  New  American  Library,  1952. 

393.  Simroth,  H.,  Die  Pendulationstheorie.  Leipzig,  1907. 

394.  de  Sitter,  L.  A.,  "Pliocene  Uplift  of  Tertiary  Mountain  Chains." 
American  Journal  of  Science,  250:297-307  (April,  1952). 

395.  Slichter,  L.  B.,  Rancho  Santa  Fe  conference  concerning  the  evolu- 
tion of  the  earth:  report  of  topics  discussed.  Proceedings  of  the 
National  Academy  of  Sciences,  36:511-14  (Sept.,  1950). 

396.  Smart,  W.  M.,  The  Origin  of  the  Earth.  Cambridge,  University 
Press,  1951. 

397.  Smith,  Albert  C.,  in  the  New  York  Times  (Dec.  4,  1955). 

398.  Smith,  J.  L.  B.,  "Investigation  of  the  Coelacanth."  Science,  v.  117, 
No.  3040  (April  3,  1953). 

399.  Smith,  Stanley,  Upper  Devonian  Corals  of  the  Mackenzie  River 
Region,  Canada.  Geological  Society  of  America,  Special  Paper  59, 

1945- 

399a.  Smith,  Warren,  The  Geologic  Structure  of  the  Philippine  Archi- 
pelago. 'S-Gravenhage,  Mouton,  1925. 

400.  Southwell,  R.  V.,  An  Introduction  to  the  Theory  of  Elasticity  for 
Engineers  and  Physicists.  Oxford,  Clarendon,  1936. 

401.  Spitaler,  Rudolf,  Die  Eiszeiten  und  Polschwankungen  der  Erde. 
Vienna,  Aus  der  Kaiserlich-Koniglichen  Hof-  und  Staatsdruckerei, 
1912. 

402.  Stearns,  Harold  T.,  "An  Integration  of  Coral  Reef  Hypothesis." 
American  Journal  of  Science,  v.  244,  No.  4  (April,  1946). 

403.  Steffens,   Lincoln,   Autobiography,  New  York,  Harcourt,   Brace, 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  417 

404.  Stetson,  H.  C.,  "Geology  and  Paleontology  of  the  Georges  Bank 
Canyon."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  XLVII: 
339-66  (March  31,  1936). 

405.  Stokes,  William  Lee,  "Another  Look  at  the  Ice  Age."  Science,  v. 
122,  No.  3174  (Oct.  28,  1955). 

406.  Stoner,  E.  C.,  "Rocks  and  the  Earth's  Magnetic  Field."  (Review 
of  Blackett,  P.  M.  S.,  Lectures  on  Rock  Magnetism.)  Nature,  v. 
179,  No.  4557  (March  2,  1957). 

407.  Stutzer,  Otto,  The  Geology  of  Coal.  Translated  and  revised  by 
Adolph  C.  Noe\  Chicago,  University  of  Chicago  Press,  1940. 

408.  Suess,  Eduard,  The  Face  of  the  Earth.  Oxford,  Clarendon,  1904. 
5  vols. 

409.  Suess,    H.    E.,    "Absolute    Chronology   of   the    Last   Glaciation." 
Science,  v.  123,  No.  3192  (March  2,  1956). 

410.  Sukachev,  V.  N.,  Scientific  Findings  of  an  Expedition  Outfitted 
by  the  Imperial  Academy  of  Sciences  for  the  Purpose  of  Excavat- 
ing the  Mammoth  Found  by  the  Beresovka  River  in  1901,  v.  III. 
Petrograd,  1914.  (The  article  by  Sukachev  was  translated  for  this 
book  by  Mrs.  Norman  Hapgood.) 

411.  Sullivan,  Walter,  "U.  S.  Team  Studies  of  Ice  in  Antarctica."  New 
York  Times  (Feb.  i,  1957). 

412.  Sverdrup,   H.   U.,  Johnson,   M.  W.,   and  Fleming,   R.   H.,    The 
Oceans,  Their  Physics,  Chemistry,  and  General  Biology.  New  York, 
Prentice-Hall,  1942. 

413.  Taber,  Stephen,  "Perennially  Frozen  Ground  in  Alaska:  Its  Origin 
and  History."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  54: 


414.  Tanner,  William  F.,  "North-South  Asymmetry  of  the  Pleistocene 
Ice  Sheet."  Science,  v.  122,  No.  3171  (Oct.  7,  1955). 

415.  Tanni,   L.,    The  Continental   Undulations  of  the  Geoid  as  De- 
termined by  Present  Gravity  Material.  Publication  18  of  the  Iso- 
static    Institute    of    the    International    Association    of    Geodesy. 
Helsinki,  Finland,  1948. 

416.  Tatel,  H.  E.,  and  Tuve,  M.  A.,  Seismic  Studies  (The  Earth's  Crust). 
Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington.  Year  Book  No.  52,  for  the 
year  1952-1953.  Annual  Report  of  the  Director.  December  11, 
1953.  (Reprint.) 

417.  Tazieff,  Haroun,  Craters  of  Fire.  New  York,  Harper,  1952. 

418.  Technical  Report  of  the  International  Conference  on  Rock  Mag- 
netism. See  Dietz,  Robert  S. 

419.  Termier,  Pierre,  "The  Drifting  of  Continents."  Smithsonian  Re- 
ports, 1924. 

420.  Time  Magazine  (Dec.  26,  1949). 

421.  Time  Magazine  (Sept.  8,  1954). 


418  EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 

422.  Tolmachev,  I.  P.,  "The  Carcasses  of  the  Mammoths  and  Rhinoc- 
eroses Found  in  the  Frozen  Ground  of  Siberia."  Transactions  of 
the  American  Philosophical  Society.  New  Series,  v.  XXIII,  Pt.  i. 
Philadelphia,  1929. 

423.  Torreson,  O.  W.,  Murphy,  T.,  and  Graham,  J.  W.,  "Magnetic 
Polarization  of  Sedimentary  Rocks  and  the  Earth's  Magnetic  His- 
tory/' Journal  of  Geophyiscal  Research,  v.  54,  No.  2  (June,  1949). 

424.  Turekian,  Karl  K.,  "The  Stratigraphic  and  Paleoecological  Sig- 
nificance of  the  SR/CA  Ratio  in  Sediments  and  Fossils."  Petro- 
leum Geologist  (March  28,  1955). 

425.  Turner,  F.  J.,  and  Verhoogen,  Jean,  Igneous  and  Metamorphic 
Petrology.  New  York,  McGraw-Hill,  1951. 

426.  Tuve,  M.  A.,  Annual  Report,  Director  of  the  Department  of 
Terrestrial  Magnetism,  Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington,  1948- 

1949.  Carnegie  Institution  Yearbook,  No.  49. 

427.  Tuve,  M.  A.,  Annual  Report,  Director  of  the  Department  of 
Terrestrial  Magnetism,  Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington,  1949- 

1950.  Carnegie  Institution  Yearbook,  No.  50. 

428.  Tuve,  M.  A.,  Annual  Report,  Director  of  the  Department  of 
Terrestrial  Magnetism,  Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington,  1955- 
1956.  Carnegie  Institution  Yearbook,  No.  56. 

428a.  Twenhofel,  W.  H.,  ed.,  "Environmental  Significance  of  Dwarfed 
Faunas,  A  Symposium."  Journal  of  Sedimentary  Petrology,  v.  18, 
No.  2  (Aug.,  1948). 

4  28b.  Twenhofel,  W.  H.,  Principles  of  Sedimentation.  New  York  and 
London,  McGraw-Hill,  1939. 

429.  Umbgrove,  J.  H.  F.,  "Recent  Theories  of  Polar  Displacement." 
American  Journal  of  Science,  v.  224,  No.  2  (Feb.,  1946). 

430.  Umbgrove,  J.  H.  F.,  The  Pulse  of  the  Earth,  2d  ed.  The  Hague, 
Martinus  Nijhoff,  1947. 

431.  "U.  S.   Geological  Survey  Radiocarbon  Dates  I."   H.   E.   Suess, 
Science,  v.  120,  No.  3117  (Sept.  24,  1954). 

432.  "U.  S.  Geological  Survey  Radiocarbon  Dates  II."  Rubin,  Meyer, 
and  Suess.  Science,  v.  121,  No.  3145  (April  8,  1955). 

433.  "U.  S.  Geological  Survey  Radiocarbon  Dates  III."  Science,  v.  123, 
No.  3194  (March  16,  1956). 

434.  "University  of  Michigan  Radiocarbon  Dates  I."   H.   R.   Crane. 
Science,  v.  124,  No.  3224  (Oct.  12,  1956). 

436.  "University  of  Pennsylvania  Radiocarbon  Dates  I."   Science,  v. 
121,  No.  3136  (Feb.  4,  1955). 

437.  Urey,  Harold  C.,  "Measurement  of  Paleotemperatures  and  Tem- 
peratures, etc."  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  v. 
62,  No.  4  (April,  1951). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  419 

438.  Urey,  Harold  C.,  The  Planets,  Their  Origin  and  Development. 
New  Haven,  Yale,  1952. 

439.  Urry,  W.  D.,  "Radioactivity  of  Ocean  Sediments  VI."  American 
Journal  of  Science,  247:257-75. 

440.  Urry,  W.  D.,  "The  Radioelements  in  Non-Equilibrium  Systems." 
American  Journal  of  Science,  240:426-36. 

441.  Victor,  Paul  Emile,  Rapport  prdliminaire.  Expeditions  polaires 
franchises,  Campagne  au  Greenland,  1950.  (Mimeographed.) 

442.  Visher,  S.  S.,  "Tropical  Cyclones  and  the  Dispersal  of  Life  from 
Island  to  Island  in  the  Pacific."  Smithsonian  Reports,  1925. 

4423.  Volchok,  H.  L.,  and  Kulp,  J.  L.,  "The  Ionium  Method  of  Age  De- 
termination." Geochimica  et  Cosmochimica  Ada,  11:219-24  (1957). 
(Pergamon  Press,  Ltd.,  London.) 

443-  Wade,  A.,  "The  Geology  of  the  Antarctic  Continent."  Proceedings 
of  the  Royal  Society  of  Queensland,  v.  52  (1941). 

444.  Wallace,  Alfred  Russel,  The  Malay  Archipelago.  New  York,  Har- 
per, 1869. 

445.  Wallace,  Alfred  Russel,  Darwinism.  London  and  New  York,  Mac- 
millan,  1891. 

446.  Wallace,  Alfred  Russel,  Island  Life,  3d  rev.  ed.  London,  Mac- 
millan,  1902. 

447.  Wanless,  Harold  R.,  and  Weller,  J.  Marvin,  "Correlation  and  Ex- 
tent of  Pennsylvania  Cyclotherms."  Bulletin  of  the   Geological 
Society  of  America,  43:1003-16  (1932). 

448.  Washington,  H.  S.,  "Deccan  Traps  and  Other  Plateau  Basalts." 
Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America,  33:765  (1922). 

449.  Webster,  A.  G.,  The  Dynamics  of  Particles  and  of  Rigid,  Elastic 
and  Fluid  Bodies,  3d  ed.  Leipzig,  Teubner,  1925. 

450.  Wegener,  Alfred,  The  Origins  of  Continents  and  Oceans.  Trans- 
lated from  the  third  German  edition  by  J.  G.  A.  Skerl.  London, 
Methuen,  1924. 

451.  Weller,  J.  Marvin,  "Cyclical  Sedimentation  of  the  Pennsylvania!! 
Period  and  Its  Significance."  Journal  of  Geology,  v.  XXXVIII, 
No.  2  (Feb.-March,  1930). 

452.  Westergaard,  H.  M.,   Theory  of  Elasticity  and  Plasticity.  Cam- 
bridge, Harvard,  1952;  New  York,  Wiley,  1952. 

453.  Whitley,  D.  Gath,  "The  Ivory  Islands  of  the  Arctic  Ocean."  Jour- 
nal of  the  Philosophical  Society  of  Great  Britain,  v.  12  (1910). 

454.  Wilson,  J.  H.,  The  Glacial  History  of  Nantucket  and  Cape  Cod. 
New  York,  Columbia  University  Press,  1906. 

455-   Wilson,  J.  Tuzo,  "On  the  Growth  of  Continents/'  Papers  and  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Royal  Society  of  Tasmania.  Hobart,  Australia, 


42O  EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 

456.  Wilson,  J.  Tuzo,  "The  Origin  of  the  Earth's  Crust."  Nature,  v. 
179,  No.  4553  (Feb.  2,  1957). 

457.  van  Woerkom,  A.  J.,  in  Shapley,  Climatic  Change. 

458.  Wool  Industries  Research  Association,  Leeds,  England,  personal 
communication. 

459.  Wright,  G.  F.,  The  Ice  Age  in  North  America,  and  Its  Bearing 
upon  the  Antiquity  of  Man.  New  York,  Appleton,  1889. 

460.  Wright,  G.  F.,  Greenland  Ice  Fields  and  Life  in  the  North  At- 
lantic. New  York,  Appleton,  1896. 

461.  Wright,  W.  B.,   The  Quaternary  Ice  Age.  London,  Macmillan, 

1937- 

462.  Wright,  C.  S.,  and  Priestly,  R.  E.,  Glaciology.  London,  Harrison, 

1922. 

463.  Wulff,   E.  V.,  An  Introduction   to  Historical  Plant   Geography. 
Waltham,  Mass.,  Chronica  Botanica,  1943. 

464.  "Yale  Natural  Radiocarbon  Dates  I."  Blau,  Deevey,  and  Gross. 
Science,  v.  118,  No.  3052  (July  3,  1953). 

465.  "Yale    Natural    Radiocarbon    Dates    II."    Preston,    Person,    and 
Deevey.  Science,  \.  122,  No.  3177  (Nov.  18,  1955). 


INDEX  OF  NAMES 


Abrons,  Stanley  Howard,  8 

Akimoto,  308 

Alexander  the  Great,  52n. 

Almond,  Mary,  33 

Anderson,  W.,  221-22 

Antevs,  Ernst,  195,  211-13,  216,  224 

Anthony,  Harold,  7 

Archer,  William,  6 

Argyris,  Thomas  S.,  230 

Arrhenius,  Gustav,  303 

Bain,  George  W.,  32,  37,  66,  71-73, 

177-78,  197 
Ball,  Robert,  39 
Barghoorn,  61-63,  68,  315 
Barnes,  Joseph,  240 
Barrell,  89,  156-57 
Bell,  Robert,  233 
Belov,  N.  A.,  235 
Benedict,  F.  G.,  233 
Benfield,  A.  E.,  117 
Benioff,  H.,  382 
Bergquist,  N.  O.,  204 
Berry,  68-69 

Birdseye,  Clarence,  240,  242 
Bishop,  Mrs.  Helen,  7 
Bishop,  Sherman  C.,  260-64 
Blanchard,  Jacques,  32,  309 
Bowen,  11 

Breen,  Walter  H.,  7,  8,  385 
Brewster,  E.  T.,  140—41 
Brice,  J.  C.,  8 
Bridgman,   Percy   L.,   7,   21,    187, 

189,  191  >  35<>,  357'  358 
Brooks,  C.  E.  P.,  52,  59,  64,  68,  137, 

140,  224,  255,  309,  310 
Broterus,  248 
Brouwer,  Dirk,  6,  17,  43 


Brown,  Hugh  Auchincloss,  6,  15- 

19,  170,  365-68,  373,  374,  381 
Bruckner,  281,  282 
Bucher,  Walter  H.,  7,  84,  125,  227 
Buker,  Errol,  6,  19,  343 
Bullard,  E.  C.,  80 
Byrd,  Richard  Evelyn,  59,  168 

Campbell,  James  H.,  6,  7,  13,  19— 
21,  73,  90-105,  108,  no,  111, 
114-15,  123,  159,  171,  197,  209, 

237»  34o-78»  379~8l»  384»  388 

Caster,  K.  E.,  28 

Chaney,  Ralph  W.,  27,  69 

Charlesworth,  J.  K.,  35,  298 

Clegg,  J.  A.,  33 

Clemence,  G.  M.,  6,  368 

Clisby,  Katharyn  H.,  290 

Cloos,  Hans,  9,  10,  143-44 

Colbert,  62,  63,  66,  67,  68 

Coleman,  A.  P.,  11,  34-38,  43,  67, 
68,  136,  170,  203-4,  219,  263, 
272,  278,  308,  311,  321,  366 

Columbus,  Christopher,  52n. 

Commoner,  Barry,  8 

Croll,  James,  279,  280,  310,  311 

Cruzen,  Rear  Admiral,  166 

Dachille,  Frank,  32,  193 

Daly,  R.  A.,  9,  10,  21,  30,  35,  79, 

8l,    112,    117,    119,    132-33,    150, 
151-52,      l6o,      l6l—62,      172-77, 

181-83,    l86>    187-89,    94>    221, 

357>  38l>  384 
Dana,  J.  B.,  89 
Darwin,  Charles,  225,  315,  316, 

325,  327-28,  335,  338 
Darwin,  George  H.,  25,  32,  369 


422 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 


Davies,  O.,  39 

Day,  A.  L.,  112,  114 

de  Geer,  Ebba  Hult,  207,  211 

de  Geer,  Gerard,  46,  211 

Deininger,  Mrs.  Whittaker,  20 

DeRance,  64,  136 

de  Vries,  Hugo,  316 

Dickerson,  223 

Digby,  Bassett,  239,  240 

Dillon,  Lawrence,  195-96 

Dobrolet,  Walter,  6 

Dobzhansky,  Theodosius,  318 

Dodson,  Edward  O.,  136,  271,  305, 

3l8>  3*9»  336 
Dorf,  Erling,  332 
Dorsey,  H.  G.,  255 
Dougherty,  Lyman  H.,  60 
Drayson,  A.  W.,  43,  45 
Dufty,  Mrs.  Maely,  8 
du  Toit,  A.  L.,  37 
Dutton,  Clarence,  83-84,  102 

Eardley,  115 

Eddington,  A.  E.,  70,  197 
Einstein,  Albert,  i,  6-7,  8,  20,  55, 
114,    170-71,    172-74,    179,    185, 

186,  194-95*  345»  35<>>  351*  357* 

361-65,  382,  388,  390,  391 
Emiliani,  Cesare,  43,  201,  202,  277, 

282,  294,  300,  309 
Eotvos,  357,  37 1-75 
Ericson,  David  B.,  7,  55,  74,  270, 

293,  300 

Euler,  Leonhard,  369 
Ewing,  Maurice,  109,  141,  358 

Falconer,  233 

Feilden,  64,  136 

Finnegan,  H.  E.,  222 

Firbaz,  Franz,  207 

Fisk,  H.  N.,  218-19 

Flint,  Richard  Foster,  54,  145,  201, 

211,  255,  272,  278,  287 
Forrest,  H.  Edward,  297,  299 


Frankland,  John  M.,  7,  118,  190, 

35°>  353'  359 
Frazer,  James  G.,  389 

Geikie,    Archibald,     189-90,    225, 

279 
Gidley,  James  William,  308 

Gilluly,  131,  221 

Gilman,  Coburn,  8 

Godwin,  Harold,  219 

Gold,  T.,  32,  197,  355 

Goldring,  Winifred,  66 

Goldschmidt,  Richard,  319,  320 

Grabau,  Amadeus  W.,  125-26 

Graham,  J.  W.,  32 

Grand,  Mary  Garrison,  7,  361 

Gregory,  J.  W.,  136 

Gutenberg,  Beno,  9,  11,  30,  32,  35, 
63,  79-80,  87,  88,  116,  118,  120- 
23,  137,  162-63,  189,  226,  354 

Hackett,  Chauncey,  7 

Haldane,  J.  B.  S.,  318 

Hall,  89 

Halle,  T.  B.,  223 

Hansen,  L.  Taylor,  30,  207 

Hapgood,  Mrs.  Norman,  8,  245 

Harris,  Herbert,  240 

Hartnagel,  C.  A.,  260-64 

Heiskanen,  182 

Henry,  Thomas  R.,  9,  59,  60,  166- 

67 

Herz,  F.  F.,  240,  248 
Hibben,  Frank  C.,  7,  9,  207,  227, 

266-69,  271 

Hillaby,  John,  218-19 
Hobbs,  William  H.,  12,  104,  105, 

106,  113-14,  143,  358,  379 
Horberg,  Leland,  47-48,  200,  202, 

379 

Hough,  Jack,  50,  55,  202,  364 
Howard,  John  Langley,  8 
Howorth,  H.  H.,  241-42 
Hoyt,  Joel  L.,  258-59 


INDEX    OF    NAMES 


4*3 


Hubbert,  M.  King,  160 
Humphreys,   W.    J.,    38,    69,    140, 

205-6,  252,  254,  285 
Hunt,  J.  C.,  264 
Huntington,  Ellsworth,  207 

Jacobs,  Norman  A.,  8 
Jacobsen,  Glen,  167 
Jaggar,  Thomas  A.,  112-13,  152-53 
Jeffreys,  Harold,   17,   27,  80,   117, 
i33>  *63>  178,  181,  186,  188-89, 

351*  359»  369 
Joly,  J.,  87,  120 

Kalb,  Bernhard,  167-68 

Kanwisher,  John  W.,  208 

Karlstrom,  Thor,  307 

Kay,  Marshall,  7 

Kelly,  Allan  O.,  32,  193 

Kenison,  Frank,  6 

Kolbe,  299 

Kreichgauer,  392 

Kroeber,  Alfred  Louis,  40-41 

Krumbein,  W.  C.,  9,  23,  89,   115, 

!3* 
Kulp,  J.  L.,  55,  271 

Lambert,  30 

Lammers,  William,  6 

Lapina,  N.  N.,  235 

Lap  worth,  105-6 

Lecomte  du  Noiiy,  Pierre,  3i8f 

Libby,  Willard  F.,  46 

Linehan,  Daniel,  52n. 

Love,  S.  G.,  258,  259 

Low,  203-4 

Lull,  Richard  Swann,  321,  331 

Lydekker,  Richard,  238-39 

Lyell,  Charles,  48,  234,  261,  304, 

3!3 
Lyman,  Charles  P.,  232 

Ma,  Ting  Ying  H.,  32,  73-77,  19? 
McFarlan,  E.,  218-19 


Malaise,  Rene*,  285,  299 
Mallery,  Arlington  H.,  52n. 
Maxwell,  James  Clerk,  17,  25,  366- 

69»  377 
Mayo,  Charles,  7 

Mayor,  A.  G.,  76 
Meinesz,  see  Vening  Meinesz 
Melton,  F.  A.,  160 
Mendes,  J.  C.,  28 
Meryman,  Harold  T.,  242-43 
Meyer,  195 
Millis,  John,  271 
Moodie,  Roy  L.,  261 
Munk,  Walter,  33 

Nares,  G.  S.,  64 

Negris,  P.,  142-43 

Neuville,  H.,  229-31 

Nikiforoff,  C.  C.,  69 

Nolke,  138 

Nordenskjold,  N.  A.  E.,  234 

Nordenskjold,  N.  O.  G.,  52n.,  168- 

69 
Olivier,  Charles  P.,  1 1 

Pauly,  Karl  A.,  32,  70-71,  195 
Penck,  196,  281,  282 
Perry,  Ralph  Barton,  Jr.,  7 
Peter  the  Great,  244 
Philipp,  107 
Piggett,  C.  S.,  49 
Piri  Reis,  520. 
Pirsson,  Louis  V.,  80,  82 
Planck,  Max,  365 
Poinsot,  Louis,  377 
Politzer,  Mrs.  Use,  8,  391 
Pollock,  James  B.,  223 
Priestly,  Raymond  E.,  52,  60 
Punshon,  E.  R,  389 

Ramsay,  Wilhelm,  161,  279 
Reid,  Henry  Fielding,  82 
Rensch,  336 


424 


EARTH    S    SHIFTING    CRUST 


Revelle,  Roger,  33 
Richter,  C.  F.,  162-63 
Roberts,  Leo,  7 
Routh,  369 
Rowe,  Mrs.  Stanley,  7 
Runcorn,  S.  K.,  250 

Saks,  N.  V.,  235 

Sanderson,  Ivan  T.,  8,  230,  320 

Sarton,  George,  7,  21,  392 

Sayles,  R.  W.,  223 

Scholander,  P.  F.,  208 

Schuchert,  Charles,  80,  82,  140 

Schwarzschild,  M.,  390 

Scott,  John,  7 

Scott,  Robert  Falcon,  166-67 

Scott,  W.  B.,  64,  227-28 

Sears,  Paul  B.,  290 

Seward,  A.  C.,  63 

Shackleton,  Ernest,  59 

Shaler,  219 

Shapley,  Harlow,  6,  17,  35,  368-69 

Simpson,  George  Gaylord,  9,  315, 

329>  333~36»  337 
Slichter,  L.  B,,  u 
Sloss,  L.  L,  9,  23,  89,  115,  131 
Smart,  W.  M.,  117 
Smith,  Albert  C.,  138 
Smith,  Warren  D.,  223-24 
Sonder,  106 
Stokes,  William  Lee,  39-40,  56- 

57>  IS1 
Stubbs,  P.  H.  S.,  33 

Stutzer,  Otto,  311 
Suess,  Eduard,  314 
Suess,  H.  E.,  277,  300 
Sukachev,  V.  N.,  246 
Sullivan,  Eileen,  8 


Tatel,  H.  E.,  150 
Tazieff,  Haroun,  207 
Termier,  Pierre,  140 
Thomas,  Charles  W.,  171 
Toll,  Baron,  234-35 
Tolmachev,  I.  P.,  241-42,  256 
Tresca,  M.,  190 
Tuve,  M.  A,  150 
Tyndall,  John,  39 

Umbgrove,  J.  H.  F.,  9,  28,  35,  60, 
68,  84-85,  106-8,  120,  125,  129, 
133,  138,  141,  142,  148,  156,  173, 

223,  332,  35°»  358 
Urey,  Harold  C.,  11,  126,  202,  294 
Urry,  W.  D.,  49-50,  52,  195,  202, 

300,  301,  364 

van  Camp,  Robert,  6 

Van  Woerkom,  A.  J.,  43 

Vening  Meinesz,  F.  A.,  28,  87-88, 

106-7,  !73>  *74>  392 
Verrill,  Mrs,  A.  Hyatt,  7 
Volchok,  H.  L.,  55,  271 
Vorse,  Mrs.  Mary  Heaton,  7 

Wallace,  Alfred  Russel,  62-63,  65, 

220,  310,  325,  326 
Walters,  M.  L,  52n, 
Warrington,  Henry,  5-6 
Wegener,  Alfred  von,  26-31,  133, 

136,  196,  386,  392 
Weller,  J.  Marvin,  312 
Willis,  138 

Wilson,  J.  Howard,  219 
Wollin,  Goesta,  55 
Wright,  G.  F.,  219 
Wright,  W.  B.,  44,  52 


Tanner,  W.  F.,  198 


Zeuner,  281,  282 


INDEX  OF  SUBJECTS 


Academy  of  Sciences  (Russian),  8, 

244-45 
adaptation,  61,  228-32,  250,  322- 

23.  See  also  mammoth 
adaptive  radiation,  32Qff,  333ff 
Alaska,    earlier   location   of  pole, 

2?5»  3°3~8 

amateurs,  3,  6 

ammonites,  63 

amphibians,  62,  63.  And  see  in- 
dividual species 

ancient  maps,  showing  ice-free 
Antarctica,  52n. 

"Angaraland,"  137 

annual  rings  in  fossilized  woods, 
68-69 

anomalies,  in  Antarctica,  161,  163, 
172;  in  Arabian  Sea,  174;  in 
Cyprus,  173;  in  East  Indies,  173; 
in  Great  Rift  Valley  of  Africa, 
173;  in  Harz  Mountains,  173;  in 
Hawaiian  Islands,  172,  174;  in 
the  Himalayas,  173,  176,  384; 
in  India,  173-76;  in  Nero  Deep, 
173;  in  Scandinavia,  161,  174;  in 
U.S.A.,  174;  negative,  162,  173- 
75;  positive,  175 

Antarctica,  coal  beds  in,  59;  ero- 
sion in,  59;  evidence  for  dis- 
placement, 54,  364;  forested,  60; 
icecap  in,  larger  than  Wisconsin 
icecap,  38 iff,  and  see  icecap, 
displacement,  centrifugal  effect; 
possesses  folded  mountains,  59; 
summer  described,  i68ff;  tem- 
perate periods  in,  50-55,  58-61, 
217,  305;  unglaciated,  ibid.;  see 
also  Wisconsin  glaciation,  cores, 
ionium  method,  radioelement 


dating,  Hudson  Bay,  displace- 
ment; tropical  flora  in,  60 

anomaly,  as  epeirogenic  uplift, 
121-22;  centrifugal  effects  of, 
179-80,  373-74;  from  triaxial 
deformation,  181-82.  See  also 
uncompensated  mass,  icecap, 
displacement 

antelope,  233 

anticlines,  88-90 

anticyclonic  winds,  53,  215 

anti-Darwinians,  319 

"Appalachia,"   141 

Archaeocyathidae,  59 

Arctic  Ocean,  only  of  Mesozoic 
age,  149 

armadillos,  335 

ash  trees,  65 

asthenosphere,  14,  99-100,  185-92, 
353;  currents  in,  alleged  cause 
of  mountain  building,  87;  fluid- 
ity, 186;  liquid  properties,  basic 
assumption  for  displacement 
hypothesis,  388;  not  sharply 
demarcated  from  lithosphere, 
i5off,  i85ff;  solidity  of,  refuted, 
189;  strength  estimated  from 
deep-focus  earthquakes,  188-89; 
viscosity  explains  delay  in  iso- 
static  adjustment,  179,  184;  vis- 
cosity increased  by  pressure, 
i86ff.  See  also  displacements, 
viscosity 

asymmetry  of  icecaps,  i,  i8ff,  Fig. 


basalts,  133,  172;  found  on  floor  of 
Atlantic,  152.  And  see  plateau 
basalts 


426 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING  CRUST 


beaches,  on  highlands,  224-25;  on 
inland  mountains,  142-43 

bears,  262,  335 

beaver,  giant,  227,  262,  335;  small, 
262 

"bipolar  mirrorism,"  327-29 

birch,  65 

bison,  233,  262;  giant,  335 

"Brady  Interval"  (retreat  of  Wis- 
consin icecap),  201 

bursting  stress  on  crust,  91,  92,  199, 
345>  35°*  378>  384J  compared 
with  crushing  point  of  basalt, 
350;  computed,  361;  near  criti- 
cal point  now,  381 

calamites,  62 
Cambrian,  67 

camel,  extinct  in  North  America, 
2*27;  in  Pleistocene  Alaska,  307- 

8,  335»  336 

carbon  dioxide  gas,  and  Climatic 
Optimum,  209;  causes  general 
warming  of  climate,  208;  and 
recession  of  icecap,  209;  result- 
ing from  volcanism,  207-8,  211 

Carboniferous,  62,  66,  68,  72 

caribou,  262 

"Gary  Advance"  (of  Wisconsin  ice- 
cap), 201,  211,  272 

centrifugal  effect,  i,  2,  158:,  374ff; 
calculated,  359-60;  distinguished 
from  Eotvos  effect,  357;  exist- 
ence questioned,  357,  365ff;  this 
objection  answered,  365-78; 
mechanism,  Ch.  XI  passim;  not 
exhausted  in  local  crust  defor- 
mations, 359;  of  anomalies,  172; 
of  icecaps,  16-19,  1 59~^3,  172, 
igSff,  340,  356,  384;  of  triaxial 
deformation  of  earth,  184-85; 
still  operative,  379-86;  sufficient 
to  fracture  crust,  362  (and  see 
fractures);  tangential  compo- 


nent, 341,  Table  III,  372.  See 
also  anomaly,  displacement, 
Eotvos  effect,  icecap,  isostasy, 
isostatic  adjustment,  uncom- 
pensated  mass 

climate,  Chs.  II,  III,  VII,  VIII,  X; 
abrupt  changes  of,  15,  237-43; 
various  explanations  of  these  re- 
futed, 60-61;  these  changes  evi- 
dence for  displacement,  78;  and 
only  explanation  for  frozen 
mammoths,  244;  gradual 
changes,  77-78;  this  theory  re- 
futed, 78;  measured  by  radio- 
element  dating  of  pollen,  29off; 
in  Siberia,  195,  234;  unrelated  to 
internal  heat  of  earth,  118.  See 
also  cores,  displacements,  extinc- 
tions, ionium  method,  radioele- 
ment  dating,  volcanism 

"Climatic  Optimum,"  31,  54ff,  196, 
201,  209,  255 

climatic  zones,  evidence  for  dis- 
placements, 73;  inconstant,  12, 
70,  and  Ch.  Ill,  passim;  mineral 
components,  72$ 

coal  beds,  59,  62,  64,  310-11;  as 
evidence  for  displacements,  71; 
rate  of  formation,  31  off 

"Cochrane  Advance"  (of  Wiscon- 
sin icecap),  201,  216;  local  and 
minor,  202 

coelacanth,  320 

conifers,  65 

"contemporaneity"  of  events  with- 
in the  same  geological  period, 
refuted,  38ff,  4 iff,  44,  45,  65-69, 
i28ff,  130,  131 

continental  drift,  14,  26-31,  75-77, 
*33>  l83»  *96>  372;  refuted,  27, 
28-30.  See  also  Ma  and  Wegener 
in  Index  of  Names 

continental  shelf,  141,  142-44 

"continental  slope,"  141 


INDEX    OF    SUBJECTS 


427 


continents,  ancient  (Brooks  the- 
ory), 137;  building,  related  to 
volcanic  islands  and  sedimenta- 
tion, 115;  elevation  and  subsid- 
ence explained,  153-57  (see  a^so 
sea  level,  elevation,  displace- 
ment); invaded  by  epicontinen- 
tal  seas,  85,  140;  this  phenome- 
non quasi-periodic,  85;  origin  of, 
hitherto  unexplained,  12,  iggff; 
permanence  alleged,  134-35, 
298;  refuted,  135!!,  139-48,  150^, 
157,  298-300;  shape  correspond- 
ence, 28;  strength  of  lithosphere 
at  ocean  bottoms,  refuting 
"floating  continents"  idea,  28; 
submergence,  as  evidence  for 
displacement  of  crust,  156-57; 
sunken,  137-45,  29gff,  326.  See 
also  land  bridges 

cooling  of  earth,  82,  no;  adduced 
to  explain  isostatic  anomalies, 
182;  to  explain  mountain  build- 
ing, 79-80;  this  theory  refuted, 
87-88;  to  explain  universal  tem- 
perate climate,  66-67;  tn*s  t^ie" 
ory  refuted,  67-69,  and  Chs.  Ill, 
VII,  IX  passirrt 

coral,  62,  73^;  evidence  for  dis- 
placement, 75-77  (see  also  Ma 
in  Index  of  Names);  seasonal 
variation  in  cells,  74;  indicators 
of  latitude,  73-74 

cores,  50-51,  54,  55-56,  271,  277, 
282,  284-87,  290-303,  305,  309. 
See  also  ionium  method,  radio- 
element  dating 

crack  in  earth's  crust,  world-wide 
(Ewing  canyons),  81,  109,  no, 
113,  385;  consistent  with  force 
pulling  Americas  southward, 
385;  continuous  earthquake  ac- 
tivity along,  109,  385;  related  to 
displacement,  past  or  impend- 


ing,   no,    385;    and   volcanism, 

i*3 

craters,  126 

Cretaceous,  63,  68,  72,  75,  131,  309 

crinoids,  camariate,  334 

crust,  compression  on,  100-2,  153, 
1 75-76»  383-84;  crushing 
strength  (compressive  strength), 
358;  elasticity,  92,  101;  folding, 
80-90;  hydrostatic  balance,  99- 
100;  rapid  warping,  216,  222—26; 
resistance  to  fracture  slight,  351; 
sinking  under  weight  of  sedi- 
ments, refuted,  81-82  (see  geo- 
synclines);  stretching,  91—99, 
153;  structure,  i5off;  tensile 
strength,  100,  124,  175-76,  186, 
200,  357-58,  391;  thickness,  14, 
123-24;  variation  in  thickness, 
124-25,  151-52.  See  also  burst- 
ing stress,  displacement,  frac- 
tures, "mountain  roots,"  nega- 
tive geography 

crustaceans,  73 

cycle  of  climatic  change,  21,000 
years  long,  309 

Dawn  Redwood,  320 

deer,  262,  335 

"denudation,"  area  of,  163 

"deposition,"  area  of,  163 

deserts,  in  all  geological  periods, 
68;  mainly  in  horse  latitudes,  72 

Devonian,  62,  66,  68-69,  75>  7§ 

diastrophisms,  diastrophic  disturb- 
ances, 131,  312.  See  also  dis- 
placements, mountain  building 

diatoms,  fresh- water,  in  mid- At- 
lantic, 299;  evidence  for  land 
mass  in  that  area,  299ff 

dinosaurs,  335;  not  degenerate, 
336;  extinction  attributed  to 
displacements,  336 

displacements  of  crust,  i,  2,  13-15, 
2off, 


428 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING    CRUST 


displacements  of  crust  (Cont.) 

57,    176,    200,    203ff,    207ff, 

219,  237,  24gff,  287,  314,  390, 
and  Chs.  IX,  XI,  XII  passim; 
approximate  equality  of  extent, 
86;  basic  assumptions  of  hypoth- 
esis, 377,  387!!;  cause  local  in- 
creases in  crust  strength,  176; 
discontinuous,  351-52;  economic 
consequences  of  theory,  38off; 
effects,  95-96,  Figs.  II,  V,  VI, 
Ch.  XII;  evidence  for,  passim; 
topics  cited  in  evidence,  387; 
evolution  and,  322ff,  Ch.  X  pas- 
sim; explain  acceleration  of  geo- 
logical processes,  49,  309;  and 
block  mountains,  no;  and 
changes  in  sea  level,  120-26,  196, 
311-12;  and  "Climatic  Opti- 
mum/' 209-10;  and  climatic 
variation,  40,  65,  70,  78,  285, 
310,  312;  and  changes  in  oxygen 
content  of  atmosphere,  208;  and 
conflict  between  Antevs  and  de 
Geer  findings,  213;  and  differ- 
ences in  extent  of  European  vs. 
American  glaciations,  213-15; 
and  difficulties  in  isostasy  the- 
ory, 178-79;  and  distribution  of 
species,  329,  339;  and  emptying 
of  ecological  niches,  33 iff;  and 
epeirogenic  uplifts,  121;  and 
extinctions,  251-56,  332,  334, 
336ff,  339;  and  fracture  patterns, 
91-110;  and  gaps  in  fossil  rec- 
ord, 338-39;  and  geographical 
isolation  of  species,  322—24,  339; 
and  geosynclines,  90;  and  growth 
of  continents,  122,  i53ff;  and 
heat  of  earth,  116-19;  and  in- 
constancy of  climatic  zones,  70, 
303;  and  inconstancy  of  icecap 
locations,  i7iff,  287;  and  "in- 
terstadials,"  209-10;  and  land 


bridges,  i38ff;  and  lateral  com- 
pression of  sedimentary  rock  in 
India,  176;  and  mountain 
ranges,  i38ff;  and  rapid  crustal 
warping,  216;  and  "sea  mounts/' 
i47ff;  and  structure  of  crust, 
152-53;  and  tempo  of  evolu- 
tion, 322ff,  339;  and  various 
anomalies,  175-76;  and  Virenz, 
332ff,  339;  and  volcanism,  43, 
111-15,  196,  204-8,  269;  and 
world-wide  lowering  of  tempera- 
ture, 43;  future,  of  Antarctic 
icecap,  380-86;  impending  ac- 
tivity, evidence  for,  382!!;  inter- 
vals between  beginnings  of, 
about  40,000  years,  277,  284, 
38off;  intervals  variable,  380; 
isostasy  and,  i59ff,  365-78;  in 
North  America,  see  Wisconsin 
glaciation  and  Ch.  VII  passim; 
northward  in  Siberia,  271  and 
Ch.  VIII  passim;  Pennsylvanian 
cycles  and,  313;  periodicity,  85- 
86;  perpetual,  304,  314;  physical 
mechanism,  Campbell  hypoth- 
esis, 388,  Ch.  XI  passim;  objec- 
tions to  this  explanation,  22; 
answered,  i97ff,  352-78;  pos- 
sibly responsible  for  all  funda- 
mental features  of  crust  and 
earth's  history,  314;  prior  to 
Wisconsin  glaciation,  Ch.  IX 
passim;  proposed  causes,  15,  32, 
70;  icecap  as  one  of  these,  17- 
21  and  Ch.  XI  passim;  rearward 
buildup  of  ice  prolonging  ac- 
tivity, 353-54,  385~86;  sus- 
pended  if  both  poles  are  in 
oceans,  354ff;  this  objection  an- 
swered, 354-55;  throughout 
Paleozoic,  313;  time  element,  97, 
128-31,  277,  284,  38off;  viscosity 
of  asthenosphere  no  great  ob- 
stacle to,  igoff.  See  also  anomaly, 


INDEX    OF     SUBJECTS 


429 


Antarctica,  asthenosphere,  burst- 
ing stress,  climate,  earthquakes, 
extinctions,  fractures,  ice  ages, 
icecaps,  isostasy,  isostatic  adjust- 
ment, lowering  of  temperature, 
meridian  of  maximum  thrust, 
mountain  building  and  origins, 
poles,  triaxial  deformation,  vis- 
cosity, volcanism 

distribution  of  species,  i35ff,  325- 
29,  339;  Ch.  Ill,  passim 

domes  and  basins,  no;  related  to 
displacement,  no,  120,  184 

downward  projections  of  crust, 
124-25,  151-52,  190-92 

Drayson  hypothesis,  43,  and  see 
Drayson  in  Index  of  Names 

Drosophila,  319 

earth,  formed  as  a  solid,  n;  cool- 
ing, 66-67  (and  see  cooling); 
heating,  n,  116—19  (and  see 
heat);  magnetic  field,  33,  308; 
molten  origin,  discredited,  82- 
84,  112,  117,  182;  triaxial  de- 
formation of,  180-84.  $ee  a^so 
centrifugal  effect,  crust,  dis- 
placements, equatorial  bulge, 
isostasy,  poles 

earthquakes,  90—103,  109,  113,  118, 
Figs.  II-VI,  Ch.  XI;  deep-focus, 
and  strength  of  asthenosphere, 
188;  function,  384;  and  impend- 
ing crust  displacement,  382-86; 
in  Assam,  383-84;  in  India,  383; 
pushed  Himalayas  up  nearly  200 
feet  farther  from  isostatic  adjust- 
ment, 384;  this  phenomenon  un- 
explainable  save  in  terms  of  dis- 
placement, 384;  major,  from 
world-wide  stress  systems,  382; 
from  icecap  thrust,  382;  increas- 
ing in  frequency  and  violence, 
382-85;  minor,  of  local  origin, 
382;  produce  heat  by  friction, 


118;  and  triaxiality  of  earth, 
189.  See  also  crack  in  earth's 
crust,  displacements,  fractures, 
geosynclines 

eccentricity    of    Antarctic    icecap, 
i8ff,  Fig.  I,  198;  contrasted  with 
that  of  Wisconsin  icecap,  ig8ff 
elephants,  229-33,  336>  337 
elevations  of  land,  drastic  changes 
in,  38,  142,  219-21;  adduced  to 
explain  climatic  change,  60-61; 
this  theory  refuted,  61;  related 
to    displacements,    120-23,    285. 
See     also     epeirogenic     uplifts, 
mountain      building,      beaches, 
land  bridges,  displacements 
elk,    American,    262;    Irish,    262; 
killed    and    preserved   by   same 
sort  of  conditions   as  held   for 
mammoth  and  mastodon,  262 
England,    separated    from    Euro- 
pean continent  within  last  7,000 
years,  218-19 
Eocene,  64,  69,  309,  314 
Eotvos  effect,  357,  371-75 
epeirogenic  uplifts,  i2off,  128,  153 
epicontinental  seas,  85ff,  140,  148- 

49 

equatorial  bulge,  accounting  for 
stretching  and  compression  of 
crust,  goff,  345-5 1,  Figs.  XIII, 
XIV,  XV;  lying  beneath  crust, 
346;  origin,  370;  and  rotational 
stability,  17,  20,  25,  366.  See  also 
fractures,  wedge  effect 

equipotential  surface,  370-72,  374, 
377;  sea  level,  372-73.  See  also 
geoid 

erosion,  48,  106,  152-53;  and  for- 
mer continents,  141;  and  iso- 
static adjustment,  162,  177; 
mountain  building,  80-82;  and 
peneplains,  177-78;  and  sedi- 
mentary rocks,  129 


43° 


EARTH    S     SHIFTING     CRUST 


Everest,  Mount,  increased  height 
since  1950,  and  displacement, 

384 

evolution,  12,  and  Ch.  X  passim; 
causes,  3i5ff;  and  climate,  32off; 
and  displacements,  322;  "ex- 
plosive/' see  Virenz;  and  glacial 
periods,  321;  and  macromuta- 
tions,  319;  and  mutation,  316- 
18;  mystical  explanations,  318— 
19;  "quantum,"  see  Virenz; 
selection  pressure,  318;  unex- 
plained, 315;  vast  stretches  of 
time  required  without  drastic 
climatic  change  being  adduced, 
3 i 6— 20 

extinctions,  197,  207,  227;  Ch. 
VIII  passim;  and  impending  dis- 
placement, 386;  hitherto  unex- 
plained, 228,  315.  See  also  mam- 
moth, mastodons 

"Farmdale  Advance"  (of  Wiscon- 
sin icecap),  200,  273,  307 

"Farmdale-Iowan  Interstadial," 
200 

ferns,  62,  63 

floating  of  bodies  from  gases  pro- 
duced in  decomposition,  237; 
not  observed  in  very  cold  waters, 

237 

foraminifera,  and  sea  mounts,  148; 
and  displacements,  287,  295-96; 
in  Arctic,  287 

fossilization,  a  rare  accident,  68; 
not  limited  to  warm-climate 
creatures,  68 

fossil  record,  gaps  in,  337-39;  ex- 
plained, 129,  338 

foundering  of  continents,  1395 

foxes,  262 

fractures  of  the  crust,  81,  91-99, 
log-1^  385»  Figs.  II-VI;  and 
displacements,  91-99,  104-10, 
177,  204*1,  209,  364,  379,  391; 


major,  93,  935,  1135;  minor,  93, 
115;  more  ancient  systems  oblit- 
erated by  those  from  most  recent 
displacements,  108;  and  moun- 
tain building,  91-99;  older  the- 
ories of  origin  refuted,  106-7; 
and  wedge  effect,  345ff,  351,  363. 
See  also  centrifugal  effect,  crust, 
displacements,  equatorial  bulge, 
magma,  mountain  building, 
mountains 

friction,  subcrustal,  118;  alleged 
brake  on  displacements,  353; 
this  objection  answered,  353 

frozen  foods,  238-40;  related  to 
mammoth,  24off 

fusion  of  nuclei,  390 

genes,  316,  318,  319 
"geoid,"   158,   179,    182,   183,  375, 
377;    represented   by   sea   level, 

373 

geosynclines,  87-90,  100,  115,  127; 
supposed  origins,  89-90.  See  also 
centrifugal  effect,  displace- 
ments, mountain  building 

glaciations,  European,  not  con- 
temporaneous with  North  Amer- 
ican, 280-83,  292;  Ch.  IX  passim 

glaciers,  Ch.  II  passim,  67,  70,  193; 
not  universally  receding,  1 64-65, 
167-68.  See  icecap 

Glossopteris,  60 

"Gondwanaland,"  137 

gradualism,  313-14  (see  also  Lyell 
in  Index  of  Names);  a  habit  of 
mind  (Einstein  quotation),  364 

gravitational  contraction,  insuffi- 
cient to  account  for  earth's  heat, 
116 

gravitational  surface,  372-73,  377 

gravity,  37off;  accounts  for  shape 
of  earth,  158,  370.  See  also  isos- 
tasy,  isostatic  adjustment 


INDEX    OF    SUBJECTS 


431 


Greenland,  amphibians  in,  62; 
centrifugal  effect  of  icecap,  381; 
displacement  in  near  future  pos- 
sible, 38 iff;  formerly  unglaci- 
ated,  63,  64,  382,  Chs.  II,  III, 
IX;  ice  sheet  still  growing,  164- 
65;  in  tandem  with  Antarctic 
icecap,  381;  isostatic  adjustment 
of,  contradictory  findings,  381; 
lignite  in,  64;  previous  location 
of  pole,  288-302  and  Ch.  IX 
passim;  this  discovery  confirmed, 
292,  295,  308 

hazel,  65 

heat,  subcrustal,  116-19;  evidence 
for  displacement  of  crust,  118; 
gradient  differs  in  different  con- 
tinents, 117;  rate  of  dissipation, 
117-18 

"Heiskanen  formula,"  174 

Himalayas,  uncompensated  mass 
of,  173,  176;  raised  by  Indian 
earthquake  of  1950,  384;  stand 
about  864  feet  too  high,  173 

horse,  227,  233,  262,  338;  Pleisto- 
cene, 227,  335,  336 

horseshoe  crabs,  320 

Hudson  Bay,  locale  of  pole  during 
Wisconsin  glaciation,  Ch.  VII 
passim,  272,  274-75,  288,  299, 
300,  303 

humidity,  increased,  and  growth  of 
icecaps,  165 

ice,  accumulation  far  faster  than 
isostatic  adjustment,  162,  356; 
amount  roughly  constant,  217, 

357 

ice  ages,  alleged  causes,  42;  these 
in  conflict  with  laws  of  physics, 
41-42;  allegedly  world- wide, 
$8ff,  328;  this  theory  refuted, 
39-44;  and  "bipolar  mirrorism," 
327-29;  in  Carboniferous,  67;  in 


Pleistocene,  303,  Ch.  VII  and 
IX;  in  pre-Cambrian,  67;  in 
tropics,  unexplained,  12,  34; 
specifications  for  adequate  the- 
ory of,  56-57 

icebergs,  not  evidence  of  decline 
in  Antarctic  icecap,  170-71; 
mode  of  formation,  170 

icecap,  Antarctic,  accounts  for 
otherwise  unexplained  Indian 
earthquakes,  383-84;  and  Cuzco 
earthquake,  384;  and  Ewing 
canyons,  385;  and  increased 
strain  on  crust,  384;  alleged  re- 
cession of,  i64ff;  eccentrically 
placed,  i8ff,  Fig.  I;  factor  in 
world  climate,  53;  growth  con- 
temporary with  recession  of  Wis- 
consin glaciation,  53;  isostatic 
adjustment  of,  i5gff;  this  asser- 
tion refuted,  163-64;  less  ancient 
than  formerly  believed,  50-56, 
161;  rapid  growth  of,  164-65, 
171-72;  uncompensated,  i72ff. 
See  also  anomaly,  centrifugal 
effect,  "Climatic  Optimum,0 
crack  in  crust  (Ewing  canyons), 
displacements,  ice  ages,  isostasy, 
isostatic  adjustment,  meridian  of 
maximum  thrust,  poles 

icecap,  North  American,  Ch.  VII 
passim.  See  Wisconsin  glaciation 

icecaps,  i6ff,  Chs.  II,  III,  VII,  VIII, 
IX,  XI  passim;  alleged  recession 
in  Antarctica,  i64ff;,  best  ex- 
plained by  presence  of  land  at  a 
pole,  56-57;  contrasted  with 
Martian  counterpart,  126-27; 
eccentricity,  i8ff,  i93ff;  growth 
accelerated  by  world-wide  warm 
climate,  165;  in  the  Congo,  37; 
in  Siberia,  255—56;  in  tropics  at 
sea  level,  38;  incredibly  rapid 
disappearance,  202  (sec  also 
carbon  dioxide);  "misplaced," 


43* 


EARTH'S   SHIFTING   CRUST 


icecaps  (Cont.) 

35-37;  mode  of  movement,  263; 
pressures  exerted  by,  35 iff,  358— 
59;  rapidity  of  growth,  best  evi- 
dence for  centrifugal  effect  as- 
sumption, 200;  rate  calculation 
suggested  by  Einstein,  391;  si- 
multaneous growth  and  disap- 
pearance, evidence  for  displace- 
ment of  crust,  53;  time  element, 
277,  284;  and  world  climate, 
Chs.  II,  III,  VII.  See  also  anom- 
aly, centrifugal  effect,  "Climatic 
Optimum,"  climate,  displace- 
ments, earthquakes,  ice  ages,  isos- 
tasy,  isostatic  adjustment,  me- 
ridian of  maximum  thrust,  poles 

ice  sheets,  compared  with  litho- 
sphere,  99;  Cordilleran,  308; 
destroy  evidence  of  previous 
glaciations,  278-79,  305;  Euro- 
pean, entered  Britain  from 
northwest,  297-99;  evidence  for 
sunken  continents,  142,  297-99; 
in  India,  36ff;  this  glacier  with- 
drew recently,  45ff;  in  Siberia, 
255-56;  in  tropics,  34ff,  Ch.  II 
passim;  Keewatin,  272,  308; 
Labradorean,  272-73,  308;  mean 
summer  temperature  the  decid- 
ing factor  in  growth  of,  195; 
melting,  as  evidence  for  dis- 
placement of  crust,  i7iff;  not  all 
receding,  164;  Pleistocene,  not 
yet  compensated  isostatically, 
162;  rate  of  movement  far  slower 
in  Antarctica  than  in  Green- 
land, 170;  still  growing  in 
Greenland,  Baffinland,  north- 
west U.S.A.,  164-65.  See  also 
Greenland,  isostasy,  isostatic  ad- 
justment, poles 

Ichthyosaurus,  63 


"Illinoisan"  glaciation,  evidence 
for  pole  in  western  Canada,  276 

Imperial  Academy  of  Sciences 
(Russian),  8,  244-45 

impoverishment  of  island  faunas 
and  floras,  explained,  326-27 

insolation  curve,  307;  insufficient 
to  cause  ice  age,  43 

"International"  and  "Heiskanen" 
formulas  for  measuring  isostatic 
adjustment,  174 

intrazonal  adaptation,  333—35 

ionium  method,  41,  49-56,  271, 
282,  285,  293-94;  confirmed,  55; 
pronounced  reliable  by  Ein- 
stein, 364;  sources  of  error  in, 
55.  See  also  cores,  icecaps,  radio- 
element  dating 

"lowan  Advance"  (of  Wisconsin 
icecap),  201 

iris,  65 

isolation,  geographic,  factor  in 
evolution,  321,  324 

isostasy,  121,  134-35*  i58ff;  and 
centrifugal  effect,  365-78;  and 
conflicting  measurements  of 
gravity  data,  381;  departures 
from,  372ff;  established  only  at 
long  intervals,  178;  theory  ques- 
tioned, i6off,  i72ff,  174,  175,  177, 
183,  382;  theory  stands  or  falls 
with  displacement  hypothesis, 
185;  theory  threatened  by  per- 
sistence of  old  anomalies  and 
triaxial  deformation,  182-83, 
188-89.  $ee  anomaly,  anomalies 
(locations),  centrifugal  effect, 
displacements,  isostatic  adjust- 
ment 

isostatic  adjustment,  1590%  175, 
199,  216-17,  220-21,  251,  356-57, 
391;  and  centrifugal  effects, 
375ff;  and  displacements,  178, 
198-99,  251,  255;  contradictory 


INDEX    OF    SUBJECTS 


433 


measurements  of  in  Greenland, 
381;  "exists  only  in  imagina- 
tion," 177;  extreme  slowness  of, 
161-63;  imperfect  or  lacking  in 
Antarctica,  159,  160,  161;  and 
in  Scandinavia,  161;  ineffective 
in  counteracting  centrifugal  ef- 
fects of  icecaps,  164;  measure- 
ments highly  doubtful,  160;  a 
rare,  exceptional  condition,  178; 
seemingly  lacking  under  pene- 
plains, 177 
ivory,  228,  238-39 

Jurassic,  63,  66,  72,  107,  131;  coal 
deposits,  71 

Labyrinthodonts,  63 

land  bridges,  135(1,  139,  285,  297- 
300,  305,  325-26;  and  evolution, 
321;  explained,  149 

Laramide  Revolution,  131 

lava  floods,  111,  126,  204,  207 

Lepidodendron,  62 

Libocedrus,  65 

lignite,  in  Greenland,  64 

lime  trees,  65 

lithosphere,  27-28,  99-100,  175, 
352.  See  also  asthenosphere, 
crust,  displacements,  earth- 
quakes, fractures 

"living  fossils/'  320-21 

lowering  of  temperature,  world- 
wide, and  volcanism,  42-43,  206; 
explained  by  displacement,  43; 
will  not  explain  simultaneous 
glaciation  and  deglaciation,  194; 
will  not  explain  Wisconsin  gla- 
ciation, 194-95;  wrongly  as- 
sumed, 38-44 

macromutation,  319 
magma,    84,    153,    157,    188;    and 
fractures  of  crust,  91,  96,  Figs. 


III-VI,  119-120,  122-123;  and 
mountain  building,  98-100 

magnetic  field  of  earth,  changes 
in,  related  to  displacements,  33, 
308 

mammoth,  227,  228,  250-51,  256, 
258,  261,  335;  Beresovka,  8,  244- 
49,  250,  253ff;  diet  included 
grasses  and  buttercups,  243,  246- 
47,  but  no  conifers,  248,  nor 
typical  Arctic  plants,  246-47; 
probable  cause  of  his  death, 
253-55;  stomach  contents  ana- 
lyzed, 245-49;  species,  edibility, 
239-40;  frozen,  228,  240-44;  in 
summer,  243;  lacks  sebaceous 
glands,  229;  not  adapted  to  cold, 
228-32;  probably  same  species 
as  Indian  elephant,  233;  re- 
mains allegedly  washed  to  polar 
islands  by  spring  floods,  234; 
refuted,  235-36;  source  of  ivory, 
228;  study  of  skin,  compared 
with  that  of  Indian  elephant, 
229;  subcutaneous  fat  layer, 
231-33;  tusks  dredged  up  from 
Arctic  Ocean,  251 

"Mankato  Advance"  (of  Wiscon- 
sin icecap),  201,  211,  288 

"Mankato  Maximum"  (high  point 
of  Mankato  Advance  phase  of 
Wisconsin  icecap),  201,  202,  212, 
213 

maps,  confirming  hypothesis  of  ice- 
free  period  in  Antarctica,  52n. 

Mars,  126-27 

mastodon,  227,  257-65,  335;  diet 
included  plants  common  in 
present-day  New  York  State, 
260,  264-65;  survived  ice  age, 
266;  found  in  bogs  and  swamps, 
257-58;  stomach  contents  ana- 
lyzed, 257,  264 

mathematics,  limitation  of,  378 


434 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING   CRUST 


"maturity"  of  a  species.  See  intra- 
zonal  adaptation 

meridian  of  maximum  thrust 
(presently  96°  E.  Long.),  15, 
ign.  and  Fig.  I,  66,  92,  95,  96, 
109,  128,  220-21,  356,  383 

meridional  faults,  same  as  major 
fractures.  See  fractures 

meteoric  phenomena,  explainable 
only  in  terms  of  planetesimal 
hypothesis,  11 

meteorological  factors  of  glacia- 
tion,  38 

Miocene,  65,  235,  314 

"missing  links,"  337-39 

moon,  mountains  on,  formed  by 
collisions,  126;  allegedly  torn 
away  from  Pacific  basin,  183 

moose,  262 

moraines,  70;  evidence  for  dis- 
placement of  crust,  70,  288 

mountain  building  and  origins, 
Campbell  hypothesis,  90-103; 
chronology  examined,  128-31; 
explainable  by  displacements, 
85-86,  90;  from  cracking  and 
buckling  of  crust,  80-81;  miscel- 
laneous explanations,  87;  not 
exclusively  from  erosion,  81;  not 
from  cooling  of  earth,  79-80; 
not  from  shrinking  of  crust,  83- 
84;  not  simultaneous  and  world- 
wide, 130;  on  ocean  bottoms, 
149;  related  to  volcanism,  80, 
111-15;  source  a  world-wide 
force,  83-84;  this  force  quasi- 
periodic,  84-85;  nearly  contin- 
uous, 131;  source  of  energy, 
103-4;  unexpectedly  frequent, 
i28ff;  unexplained,  79ff,  176.  See 
also  centrifugal  effect,  crust,  dis- 
placements, fractures,  geosyn- 
clines,  "sea  mounts,"  volcanism 

"mountain  roots,"  124,  192 


mountains,  12,  15,  Ch.  IV;  absent 
on  Mars,  126-27;  aid  in  distri- 
bution of  species,  327-29;  and 
centrifugal  effect,  103-4;  an<^  geo- 
synclinal  theory,  89-91;  and 
magmatic  intrusions,  98-100; 
different  kinds  described,  80;  in 
Antarctica,  59;  island  chains  of, 
80,  115-16;  source  of  energy  for 
folding,  103-4;  submerged,  80, 
116;  volcanic,  80.  See  also  crust, 
centrifugal  effect,  geosynclines, 
magma,  moon,  Paricutin,  "sea 
mounts,"  volcanism 

mutations,  3i6ff;  incapable  of  pro- 
ducing new  species,  316-17;  ma- 
jority harmful  or  indifferent, 
317;  and  natural  selection,  317; 

"systematic,"  3igff;  this  theory 
adduced  to  solve  problem  of 
time,  320;  discredited,  319 

natural  selection,  315  (see  evolu- 
tion); incapable  of  producing 
new  species,  316;  requires  exces- 
sively long  time,  318 

"Nearctis,"  137 

nebular  theory  of  earth's  origin, 
10;  discredited,  11-12 

"negative  geography,"  124 

neo-Darwinians,  316-19 

New  Siberian  Islands,  site  of  mam- 
moth remains,  234,  of  fruit  trees, 
234-36;  forested  in  Miocene  and 
Pliocene,  235 

niche,  life,  sgoff;  ecological,  ibid.; 
emptying  explained,  331 

"North  Atlantis,"  137,  140 

oak,  65 

oblateness,  and  poleward  com- 
ponent of  gravity,  375.  See  equa- 
torial bulge 


INDEX    OF    SUBJECTS 


435 


ocean  basins,  origin  unexplained, 
12,  i45ff;  alleged  permanence, 
1506:.  See  also  beaches,  conti- 
nents (sunken),  foundering,  os- 
cillation of  ocean  bottoms,  sea 
bottoms,  "sea  mounts" 

Ohio  glaciation,  48,  273;  evidence 
for  displacement,  379-80 

Old  Red  Sandstone  formation,  a 
fossil  desert,  68 

Oligocene,  107 

Ordovician,  75 

orogenic  uplifts,  120 

oscillation,  rhythmic,  of  ocean  bot- 
toms, 142,  148 

oscillation  of  ice  sheets,  48,  57,  165, 
204ff.  See  also  volcanic  dust, 
volcanism 

Oxygen-  18  method,  294 

Paleocene,  64 

palm  trees,  320 

parallelogram  of  forces,  used  in 
computing  centrifugal  effect  and 
its  tangential  component,  343- 

44 
Paricutin,   80;   related   to  present 

beginning  of  displacement,  384 
peat  bogs,  64 
peccaries,  262,  335 
peneplains,    and    isostatic    adjust- 

ment, 


"Pennsylvanian"  period  (Carbon- 
iferous), 312 

periodicity,  of  displacements,  85- 
86,  277,  284,  38off;  of  mountain 
building,  84-86;  accounted  for 
by  displacements,  85-86 

permafrost,  223,  241,  244,  256 

Permian,  63,  72,  30 

Permo-Carboniferous,  68,  71,  311; 
coal  deposits,  71 

Peter  the  Great,  244 

pines,  65 


Piri  Reis  maps,  confirming  recent 
deglaciation  of  Antarctica,  52n. 

pivot  points  in  a  displacement,  15. 
See  also  triaxial  deformation  of 
earth 

plane  trees,  65 

planetesimal  hypothesis,  11 

planetoids,  collision  with  earth  a 
possible  cause  of  displacements 
of  crust,  32 

plasticity,  of  solids  under  pressure, 
190-91 

plateau  basalts,  119,  153,  188 

Pleistocene,  70,  107,  131,  196,  208, 
218,  227,  235,  267-68,  277,  309, 
335;  accepted  chronology  of  gla- 
ciations  weak,  278-83;  ended 
catastrophically,  267-69;  Euro- 
pean glaciations  not  contempo- 
rary with  American,  *8off;  fifth 
glaciation  identified,  278,  282; 
ice  sheets  not  fully  compensated 
to  date,  162 

plication,  83,  89 

Pliocene,  69,  235,  314 

"pluvial"  periods,  39 

poles,  alleged  immobility  of,  as 
example  of  hardening  of  the 
categories,  25,  31,  61,  386;  as 
example  of  circular  reasoning, 
65-66;  and  gyroscopic  effect  of 
earth's  rotation,  24  (see  also 
equatorial  bulge);  causes  of  ap- 
parent shift,  24ff  (and  see  dis- 
placements); in  Alaska,  Ch.  IX; 
in  Greenland,  Ch.  IX  passim; 
that  location  accounting  for 
New  York  temperate-zone  fauna 
enclosed  in  ice  sheet,  289; 
method  for  locating  earlier  posi- 
tions, 274ff;  position  of,  13;  posi- 
tion after  next  displacement, 
386;  shifts  a  necessary  hypoth- 
esis, 3off,  386-87;  stability  of, 


436 


EARTHS     SHIFTING     CRUST 


poles  (Cont.) 

Ch.  I,  365;  wanderings,  32-33. 
See  also  Hudson  Bay,  icecaps, 
Wisconsin  glaciation 

pollen,  agoff 

poplar,  65 

Pre-Cambrian,  67 

precession,  43,  and  see  Drayson  in 
Index  of  Names;  allegedly  re- 
lated to  2i,ooo-year  climatic 
cycle,  310 

"predictability,"  37Qff;  and  future 
developments,  Ch.  XII  passim; 
vindication  of  displacement  hy- 
pothesis, 379-80 

public  interest,  necessary  for  scien- 
tific advancement,  3 

quick-freezing  processes,  238-44 

radioactivity,  subcrustal,  87,  116; 
alleged  cause  of  mountain  build- 
ing, 87;  proposed  source  of  in- 
ternal heat  of  crust,  116-17 

radioelement  dating,  29,  41,  44-56, 
130,  195,  202,  21  off,  307,  309, 
374;  called  reliable  by  Einstein, 
364;  questioned  because  of  revo- 
lutionary conclusions,  47-48, 
212-13,  29off.  See  also  cores, 
ionium  method;  Hough  and 
Urry  in  Index  of  Names 

radiolaria,  171;  as  evidence  for  in- 
creasing coldness  of  Antarctic 
waters,  171 

reptiles,  along  Dvina  River,  63; 
in  Antarctica,  60;  in  various  sub- 
Arctic  regions,  63 

rhinoceros,  woolly,  227,  233,  234 

Rift  Valley   (Africa),   81,    143-45, 

'73 
rifts  and  rift  valleys,  81,  109,  no, 

113*  385 

"Riss"  glaciation,  evidence  for 
Eurasian  pole,  275 


rotational  stability,  17,  20,  25,  366- 

69 

sabertooth  cat,  227,  233,  234,  335, 

336 

San  Augustin  Plains,  29off 

Sangamon  Interglacial,  276,  292, 
304;  contemporary  with  Wurm 
glaciation,  292 

scorpions,  320 

sea  bottoms,  contain  mountain 
ranges,  29,  145!!;  contain  vol- 
canoes, 29;  cores  taken  from, 
see  cores,  ionium  method,  radio- 
element  dating;  evidence  for 
sunken  continents,  137-45,  2995, 
326  (see  also  land  bridges);  not 
deeply  sedimented,  29,  146,  148- 
49;  not  smooth  plains,  28-29, 
145;  recurring  uplifts,  142,  148. 
See  also  continents,  crust,  moun- 
tain building,  volcanic  islands, 
volcanism 

sea  level,  as  equipotential  surface, 
371,  373;  changes  in,  15,  120-26, 
134,  196,  216;  changes  unex- 
plained by  melting  of  icecaps, 
196,  2i7ff,  220;  "eustatic" 
change,  272;  evidence  for  fall, 
223;  fall  explained  by  growing 
Antarctic  icecap,  221-23,  226; 
not  universally  rising,  222 

"sea  mounts,"  i47ff 

seasonal  changes,  68-69 

sedimentary  beds  of  continents, 
formed  under  sea,  140 

sedimentary  rocks,  59,  78,  129,  310; 
95%  ground  down,  129 

sediments,  marine,  7 iff,  197,  271, 
Ch.  XI;  extremely  slow  deposi* 
tion  rate,  146;  and  turbidity, 
146-47.  See  also  cores,  ionium 
method,  radioelement  dating, 
sedimentary  rocks 


INDEX    OF     SUBJECTS 


437 


selection  pressure,  mild,  318; 
strong  (i.e.,  major  climatic 
change),  321 

Sequoia,  65 

sharks,  320 

shrinking  of  crust,  82-84,  87,  no; 
refuted,  83-84.  See  also  cooling 

"sial"  and  "sima,"   152 

Sierra  Nevadas,  accounted  for  by 
"gridiron"  fracture  systems,  io6 

Silurian,  75,  129 

simplicity  of  a  theory,  388 

sloth,  giant,  227 

snow,  increased  fall  in  Antarctica, 
164-65;  rapid  accumulation  in 
Antarctica,  i67ff;  explained,  169 

solids,  behavior  of,  at  extremely 
high  pressures,  189;  relationship 
to  deep-focus  earthquakes,  189 

species,  adaptation  to  different  cli- 
mates, 61,  322-23;  "degenera- 
tion" concept  refuted,  334-37; 
drastic  climatic  change  and, 
322-24;  extinctions,  197,  207, 
227;  history  compared  with  in- 
dividual growth  and  aging, 
333-37>  this  notion  likened  to 
medieval  scholastic  logic,  333; 
"maturity,"  see  intrazonal  adap- 
tation; mutations  and,  316-18; 
new,  not  produced,  3i6£f;  tropi- 
cal, survival  refutes  theory  of 
simultaneous  world-wide  glacia- 
tions,  328;  "youth,"  see  adap- 
tive radiation.  See  also  adapta- 
tion, climate,  distribution, 
extinction,  ice  ages,  land 
bridges,  mammoth,  mastodon, 
volcanism 

sphenodon,  320 

Spitzbergen,  formerly  warm,  62-65 

stabilizing     effect     of     equatorial 

bulge,  17,  20,  25 
vstorms,  236,  254-55,  266-71 


strandlines,  224ff 

stratigraphy  handicapped  by  ero- 
sion, 129 

subcrustal  currents,  87-88;  lack  of 
evidence  for,  88 

sunspot  cycles,  165 

surface  of  mass,  372-73,  377 

swamp-cypress,  65 

"Swedish  Time  Scale,"  211.  See 
varves 

"sweepstakes"  process  in  distribu- 
tion of  species,  326 

synclines,  90*  See  also  geosynclines 

Taxodium,  65 

"Tazewell  Advance"  (of  Wiscon- 
sin icecap),  200-1,  218 

"Tazewell  Maximum,"  211 

Teleosaurus,  63 

tempo,  of  evolution,  Ch.  X;  of 
geological  change,  12.  See  also 
displacements,  icecaps,  moun- 
tain building 

"Tethys  Sea,"  137,  140 

thermal  energy  arriving  at  surface, 
66 

tigers,  230;  their  thick  fur  not  an 
adaptation  to  cold,  232 

tree  ferns,  in  Antarctica,  60 

Triassic,  63,  130;  coal  deposits,  71 

triaxial  deformation  of  earth,  180- 
84;  amount  of  equatorial  oval- 
ness,  181;  evidence  for  displace- 
ment, 183-84;  irreconcilable 
with  isostasy  theory,  183 

trilobites,  67 

"Two  Creeks  Interstadial,"  201 

Tyrannosaurus  rex,  320 

uncompensated  mass,  341,  373-77. 
See  also  anomaly 

uniformitarianism,  48,  304,  and  see 
Lyell  in  Index  of  Names 

universal  temperate  climates,  re- 
futed, 65-70 


438 


EARTH'S  SHIFTING  CRUST 


varves,  68,  211,  309;  imply  seasonal 
changes,  68 

Viking  settlements,  164;  over- 
whelmed by  growing  ice  sheets, 
165 

Virenz,  Virenzperiod,  329-31; 
coincide  with  periods  of  drastic 
geological  change,  33 iff;  follow 
creation  of  empty  niches  by  ex- 
tinctions, 337 

viscosity  of  asthenosphere,  14,  86, 
179,  184,  i86ff;  decreased  by 
heat,  187;  increased  by  pressure, 
i86ff.  See  also  asthenosphere, 
displacements 

"vital  force"  in  species,  a  piece  of 
scholastic  logic,  333;  discredited, 

334~37 

volcanic  dust,  relationship  to  cli- 
mate, 2O5ff,  211 

volcanic  glass  shards,  found  in  At- 
lantic cores,  294,  296 

volcanic  islands,  location  ex- 
plained, 115 

volcanic  zones,  distribution  unex- 
plained, 111-12;  related  to  frac- 
ture systems,  113-14 

volcanism,  12,  42-43,  97,  304,  312; 
and  carbon  dioxide  gas,  207-8; 
and  Ewing  canyons,  113;  and 
extinctions,  207,  268-70,  304-5; 
and  fracture  systems,  113;  and 
immense  increase  of  precipita- 
tion, 253,  264;  and  impending 
displacement,  386;  and  moun- 
tains, 80,  111-15;  and  storms, 
268-71;  and  toxic  gases,  269; 
and  Wisconsin  glaciation,  196, 
200,  204-10;  and  world-wide 
lowering  of  temperature,  205- 
6,  252,  270;  cause  of  readvance 
of  icecap,  205-6,  252;  not  merely 
local  phenomenon,  112-13;  the- 


ories of  origin,  112-14;  unre- 
lated to  alleged  molten  origin 
of  earth,  112.  See  also  climate, 
crack  in  earth's  crust,  displace- 
ments, extinctions,  magma,  Pari- 
cutfn 

walnut,  65 

warm-climate  life  in  polar  zones, 
f2,  25,  58-65,  and  Ch.  Ill  pas- 
sim 

warming  of  climate,  world-wide, 
refuted,  164-65.  See  also  climate 
and  Chs.  II,  HI  passim 

water,  volume  approximately  con- 
stant over  geological  time,  156- 
57;  as  evidence  for  crust  dis- 
placement, 156-57 

water  lilies,  in  Greenland,  65;  in 
Grinnell  Land,  64,  65;  in  Spitz- 
bergen,  64 

wedge  effect,  345-51;  and  equato- 
rial bulge,  Figs.  XIV,  XV,  348ff, 
36off;  and  fractures,  345;  multi- 
plies centrifugal  thrust  by  500, 

349 

whale,  337 

Wisconsin  glaciation,  45,  48,  54, 
Ch.  VII,  257,  266,  268,  277,  278, 
283ff,  287ff,  289,  302,  307,  309, 
352,  379»  382;  oscillations  of,  48, 
ig6ff,  281.  See  also  volcanism 

wobble,  in  earth's  rotation,  16-17, 
32.  See  also  Blanchard  and 
Gold  in  Index  of  Names 

wolves,  245,  335 

wool,  229-30 

world-wide  system  of  submarine 
rifts,  81,  109,  no,  113,  385 

"youth"  of  a  species.  See  adaptive 
radiation 

zones.  See  climatic  zones